1
00:00:02,830 --> 00:00:08,360
Right, well, let's get started. My mom was listening to one of the lectures and she said, well,

2
00:00:08,360 --> 00:00:12,500
somebody had a really bad cough and I should have said, I'm sorry, you've got such a bad cough.

3
00:00:12,500 --> 00:00:20,370
So I just got some water. And it really does have a really bad cough this week and wants to share the billing with me for the lecture.

4
00:00:20,370 --> 00:00:25,260
Just just keep coughing more time. I'll give you that sip of water.

5
00:00:25,260 --> 00:00:30,020
OK, so this is the penultimate lecture approaching Shakespeare for this term.

6
00:00:30,020 --> 00:00:33,830
And today I'm going to talk about Macbeth.

7
00:00:33,830 --> 00:00:43,130
The question I want to suggest that Macbeth asks us or demands that we address is the question philosophers call the question of agency.

8
00:00:43,130 --> 00:00:48,140
Question of agency. Why do the things that happen happen?

9
00:00:48,140 --> 00:00:54,320
So whether we're talking about is how we can answer or at least interrogate questions of agency in Macbeth.

10
00:00:54,320 --> 00:01:00,920
Why do the events of Macbeth happen to approach this question and come to draw on some theories of

11
00:01:00,920 --> 00:01:09,230
tragedy and some theories of historical philosophy and on performance as in the previous lectures?

12
00:01:09,230 --> 00:01:13,340
What I want to try and say is that the play prompts this question.

13
00:01:13,340 --> 00:01:19,280
It doesn't answer. It prompts the question rather than answering it.

14
00:01:19,280 --> 00:01:25,930
And I'm going to, as so many coughs now, don't know what to do with my with my water.

15
00:01:25,930 --> 00:01:30,530
I am sorry. It's a bad point in the terms, isn't it?

16
00:01:30,530 --> 00:01:36,550
Okay. But I want to start not with Macbeth, but with another early modern document.

17
00:01:36,550 --> 00:01:43,010
And that's Robert Burton's huge book on the causes and the effects of melancholy.

18
00:01:43,010 --> 00:01:51,210
The Anatomy of Melancholy, first published in 16 21.

19
00:01:51,210 --> 00:02:01,200
Burton's self-appointed task is to compile information about melancholy, not to present a particular argument or an empirical case.

20
00:02:01,200 --> 00:02:11,760
It's a policy of accretion which adds more stuff rather than sort of trying to assess the merits of different different kinds of approach,

21
00:02:11,760 --> 00:02:17,550
different kinds of material. And if we look at the contents page to Burton's Anatomy of Melancholy,

22
00:02:17,550 --> 00:02:25,380
we can see something about what this policy of accretion where this policy of accretion leads.

23
00:02:25,380 --> 00:02:29,670
Burton tries to make sense of all his material by setting it under numerous headings

24
00:02:29,670 --> 00:02:33,630
and subheadings and the bits of it that I'm most interested in relation to.

25
00:02:33,630 --> 00:02:44,160
Our question of agency is the catalogue or synopsis. In discussing the question of the causes of melancholy, Burton offers a range of possibilities.

26
00:02:44,160 --> 00:02:49,020
And I hope if I go through these, the relevance, their relevance to Macbeth might start to emerge.

27
00:02:49,020 --> 00:02:56,430
First, he wonders whether the causes of melancholy might be supernatural or natural supernatural causes.

28
00:02:56,430 --> 00:03:02,940
He subdivides as from God immediately or by second causes or from the devil.

29
00:03:02,940 --> 00:03:15,020
Immediately, with the digression of the nature of spirits and devils or supernatural, but immediately by magicians and witches.

30
00:03:15,020 --> 00:03:25,500
Okay, so these are his supernatural causes from God, from the devil, or via magicians, which is the natural causes are also subjective.

31
00:03:25,500 --> 00:03:32,790
Subdivided primary as stars provided by aphorisms, signs from physiognomy and secondary.

32
00:03:32,790 --> 00:03:38,700
That breaks down into congenital temperament or heredity and secondary.

33
00:03:38,700 --> 00:03:44,300
Secondary causes have all kinds of agents, nurses, education, terrors.

34
00:03:44,300 --> 00:03:50,100
Scoffs Bitter gests, loss of liberty, poverty, loss of friends.

35
00:03:50,100 --> 00:03:52,770
This causes a broken down still further.

36
00:03:52,770 --> 00:04:01,830
If melancholy is in the mind, it may be caused from within the body, fumes from the stomach, hot brain with corrupted blood or from outside the body.

37
00:04:01,830 --> 00:04:07,110
Too much sun. Too much study. Too much garlic if it's in the body.

38
00:04:07,110 --> 00:04:11,610
Well, there are lots of potential physiological causes.

39
00:04:11,610 --> 00:04:16,560
If diet is the cause, it may be quantity or quality that's at fault.

40
00:04:16,560 --> 00:04:24,780
If passions are a cause, these can be anything from anger, envy, ambition, lust, shame, fear.

41
00:04:24,780 --> 00:04:29,820
For our benefit. There's a special section on the love of learning as a cause of melancholy,

42
00:04:29,820 --> 00:04:35,550
with a digression on the misery of scholars and why the muses are melancholy.

43
00:04:35,550 --> 00:04:40,590
And another curly bracket may get us to the Brown report.

44
00:04:40,590 --> 00:04:50,730
So I've begun with Burton because he's a near contemporary of Shakespeare who, like Shakespeare, can see a range of different causes,

45
00:04:50,730 --> 00:04:57,120
some of which look to us incompatible or deriving from widely differing understandings of the world.

46
00:04:57,120 --> 00:05:03,390
But he presents them as potential causes for a single phenomenon. Broadly speaking.

47
00:05:03,390 --> 00:05:11,760
And here, I think Burton's analysis of causes of melancholy is actually an analysis of what happens in the early modern world.

48
00:05:11,760 --> 00:05:14,400
These are the kinds of causes that people give,

49
00:05:14,400 --> 00:05:23,100
and they are the kinds of causes which are competing are competing claims for the question of agency in the world why these things happen.

50
00:05:23,100 --> 00:05:27,090
Berton's causes of melancholy result from three potential grand causes.

51
00:05:27,090 --> 00:05:33,890
The first is the melancholic individual, him or herself, who may or may not be able to help themselves.

52
00:05:33,890 --> 00:05:41,070
That may be because they are melancholy, because of their temperament, but they may be marriage may they may be melancholy because they studied lust,

53
00:05:41,070 --> 00:05:45,420
eat garlic too much, whatever, so they could do something about that, in effect, to kill.

54
00:05:45,420 --> 00:05:51,390
So sometimes the cause causes internal and sometimes it's within the control of the individual and sometimes not.

55
00:05:51,390 --> 00:05:58,590
The second cause of melancholy is other people. Other people's actions have a negative impact on the individual.

56
00:05:58,590 --> 00:06:05,220
They might die and make him feel sad. They might put him in prison. They might make fun of him.

57
00:06:05,220 --> 00:06:12,420
Ginger, rodent. One might or might think the third is the supernatural or metaphysical world,

58
00:06:12,420 --> 00:06:20,530
a category that includes God, the devil and God and devils, intermediaries, magicians and witches.

59
00:06:20,530 --> 00:06:25,110
So when Burton is trying to work out why stuff happens in his case, why melancholy happens,

60
00:06:25,110 --> 00:06:29,910
there are three possible groups of of of reasons why they might happen.

61
00:06:29,910 --> 00:06:34,670
And in Burton's analysis, they have equal claims on our attention.

62
00:06:34,670 --> 00:06:35,280
Okay,

63
00:06:35,280 --> 00:06:46,050
so someone who's starting to believe in hereditary in heredity as a as a cause of melancholy still believes in which is the stars too much garlic.

64
00:06:46,050 --> 00:06:50,810
All these things exist in the same realm of possible possibility.

65
00:06:50,810 --> 00:06:58,140
And I think we could set out the question of agency and Macbeth in broadly similar terms.

66
00:06:58,140 --> 00:07:06,060
Is this a story about an individual, a tragic story we tend to think of tragedies about as being people who direct their own fate?

67
00:07:06,060 --> 00:07:13,470
Is this a story in Macbeth in which Macbeth willingly or unwillingly directs the action of the play?

68
00:07:13,470 --> 00:07:22,560
Is this a story in which he is acted on by other people? Is he passive and shaped by the people around him?

69
00:07:22,560 --> 00:07:30,340
Or is this a story in which he is populated by supernatural forces beyond his control?

70
00:07:30,340 --> 00:07:37,630
Although these possibilities can't really be simultaneously true in that if you have a world view which agrees with one of them,

71
00:07:37,630 --> 00:07:42,490
you probably have to dismiss the other two. So even though they can't be simultaneously true,

72
00:07:42,490 --> 00:07:49,990
I think the play does seem designed to set them all out at the same time to set out the idea that Macbeth is in control of his fate,

73
00:07:49,990 --> 00:07:56,230
to set out the idea that other people are, and to set out the idea that there is a supernatural force at work in this play.

74
00:07:56,230 --> 00:08:06,650
All of these are set out as possible causes, and I don't think the play answers which one is primary.

75
00:08:06,650 --> 00:08:12,610
Now, we could look at this question of agency in a different way.

76
00:08:12,610 --> 00:08:23,620
On the 17th of May 2010, the Evening Standard carried a headline, Macbeth Gets Away with Murder in All Star Trial.

77
00:08:23,620 --> 00:08:29,650
This is the article in a final twist that would make Shakespeare turn in his grave.

78
00:08:29,650 --> 00:08:36,280
Macbeth and his wife have been found not guilty of murdering King, Duncan and Banquo.

79
00:08:36,280 --> 00:08:41,440
This was the verdict of a one night only mock trial at the Royal Courts of Justice,

80
00:08:41,440 --> 00:08:47,650
in which the case against the couple was examined, with actors playing the defendant's judge and key witnesses.

81
00:08:47,650 --> 00:08:53,770
Former Spook's star Matthew MacFadyen and Shameless is Maxine Peake played the couple.

82
00:08:53,770 --> 00:09:01,090
Macbeth pleaded diminished responsibility while Lady Macbeth claimed she was coerced.

83
00:09:01,090 --> 00:09:07,970
Toby Stephens, Toby Jones, Roger Lloyd Park and Martin Shaw were also involved.

84
00:09:07,970 --> 00:09:10,080
Now, in some ways, as philosophers have pointed out,

85
00:09:10,080 --> 00:09:17,130
the question of agency is a question of responsibility and therefore a question of blame and punishment.

86
00:09:17,130 --> 00:09:23,790
This trial, this mock trial of the Macbeth's earlier this year and a whole genre of other

87
00:09:23,790 --> 00:09:28,380
similar amateur investigations of the play that you can very easily Google.

88
00:09:28,380 --> 00:09:33,690
These are all concerned with a version of agency who is to blame for what happens.

89
00:09:33,690 --> 00:09:38,700
Or to put it another way. Can we get Macbeth off the charge?

90
00:09:38,700 --> 00:09:46,200
Online message boards seem united in the idea that the best hope of acquittal for Macbeth is to blame Lady Macbeth.

91
00:09:46,200 --> 00:09:55,290
And that, as we will see, has been often the critical reaction to the reported trial I just mentioned goes for a defence of diminished responsibility,

92
00:09:55,290 --> 00:10:01,320
i.e., Macbeth is not in control, is not a responsible agent.

93
00:10:01,320 --> 00:10:09,060
A nice comic story by the American humorist James Thurber, called the Macbeth murder mystery, also plays with this trope,

94
00:10:09,060 --> 00:10:16,560
bringing the genre of the detective story in which the question of who done it is literally key to Macbeth.

95
00:10:16,560 --> 00:10:20,160
And I think that helps us the same methods, a different kind of who done it.

96
00:10:20,160 --> 00:10:27,120
This is from Thurber that the story is that somebody who doesn't know Shakespeare has but but loves murder mysteries,

97
00:10:27,120 --> 00:10:31,320
has read Macbeth and they're being asked what they thought of it.

98
00:10:31,320 --> 00:10:34,550
Tell me. I said, did you read Macbeth? I had to read it.

99
00:10:34,550 --> 00:10:37,950
You said there wasn't a scrap of anything else to read in the whole room. Did you like it?

100
00:10:37,950 --> 00:10:41,970
I asked. No, I did not. She said decisively in the first place.

101
00:10:41,970 --> 00:10:46,320
I don't think for a moment that Macbeth did it. I looked at her blankly.

102
00:10:46,320 --> 00:10:52,800
Did what? I asked. I don't think for a moment that he killed the king. I don't think that Macbeth woman was mixed up in it either.

103
00:10:52,800 --> 00:10:58,150
You suspect them the most, of course. But those are the ones that are never guilty or shouldn't be anyway.

104
00:10:58,150 --> 00:11:02,850
I would suspect they are suddenly Macduff, she said promptly. Good God!

105
00:11:02,850 --> 00:11:09,030
I whispered softly. Oh, Macduff did it all right, said the murder specialist. Oh, Kupwara would have got him easily.

106
00:11:09,030 --> 00:11:12,870
How did you figure it out? I demanded. Well, she said I didn't straight away.

107
00:11:12,870 --> 00:11:16,920
At first I suspected Banquo. Then, of course, he was the second person killed.

108
00:11:16,920 --> 00:11:22,110
That was good right there. That part, the person you suspect of the first murder should always be the second victim.

109
00:11:22,110 --> 00:11:29,430
Is that so? A moment now. Macbeth is the play of Shakespeare's in which in some ways we know most clearly who did it.

110
00:11:29,430 --> 00:11:34,530
We watch. We more or less watch him do it. That's what the play sets up right from the start.

111
00:11:34,530 --> 00:11:38,460
But the fact that it is susceptible to these literals versions of whodunit,

112
00:11:38,460 --> 00:11:43,980
I think does engage in a different way with the question of agency that the play explores.

113
00:11:43,980 --> 00:11:48,870
So equivocally one answer to who done it is it is very straightforward.

114
00:11:48,870 --> 00:11:55,530
Macbeth and Lady Macbeth in some way have done it. But still the question remains circling around the play.

115
00:11:55,530 --> 00:12:01,830
Who really did it? What? What wages agency. Where does the responsibility lie?

116
00:12:01,830 --> 00:12:12,900
Let's try to set this out a little bit more clearly. And I we'll try and do that by thinking about the way Macbeth unfolds, the way the play begins.

117
00:12:12,900 --> 00:12:24,120
You'll remember that the first scene of my class introduces the which is weird speech rhythms accompanied by thunder and lightning.

118
00:12:24,120 --> 00:12:28,980
They seem to know what's going to happen when the burly is done,

119
00:12:28,980 --> 00:12:39,210
when the battle's lost and won and they some bristly and ominously arrange to meet with Macbeth.

120
00:12:39,210 --> 00:12:45,540
Does that mean they will they know where my breasts are going to be or are they able to draw him to them?

121
00:12:45,540 --> 00:12:51,450
Is their power therefore the power of prophecy or of direction?

122
00:12:51,450 --> 00:12:55,610
In the next scene, we discovered the aftermath of the battle.

123
00:12:55,610 --> 00:13:03,480
A bloodied captain tells the king of the bravery of Macbeth and Banquo and the treachery of the Thayn of Cordel.

124
00:13:03,480 --> 00:13:06,340
This is a scene following straight on from the scene of the witches.

125
00:13:06,340 --> 00:13:14,400
It's a scene which seems to establish a world of human agency in the same situation, a battle some men behave in a cowardly way.

126
00:13:14,400 --> 00:13:20,790
Some men behave in a in a brave way. And that seems to be because of the kind of men they are.

127
00:13:20,790 --> 00:13:25,590
The cowardly ones are punished. The brave ones are rewarded.

128
00:13:25,590 --> 00:13:32,460
The king orders caudal to be executed and that his titles should be given instead to Macbeth.

129
00:13:32,460 --> 00:13:42,830
It's a very clear human causal world where human behaviour is rewarded and punished by human agents.

130
00:13:42,830 --> 00:13:52,940
Scene three comes back with a more extended scene with the witches in witch into witch, Mount Macbeth and Banquo enter.

131
00:13:52,940 --> 00:14:02,300
Does the fact that they find the witches rather than vice versa suggests that they are in control or have the witches set up this encounter?

132
00:14:02,300 --> 00:14:11,660
The witch is prophesied to Macbeth about his future greatness. Thane Aslam's Thane of court or King Hereafter to Macbeth.

133
00:14:11,660 --> 00:14:15,170
The attribution thane of Cawdor is impossible. The Thane of court.

134
00:14:15,170 --> 00:14:22,430
Our lives are prosperous, gentlemen, but we know because of the scene we've just witnessed and with it the dramatic irony,

135
00:14:22,430 --> 00:14:25,640
which is so constitutive of Shakespeare's working methods.

136
00:14:25,640 --> 00:14:30,440
We know that the fate of CAUDAL has been stripped of his title by the King because he was a coward.

137
00:14:30,440 --> 00:14:37,080
So we know there is a human reason why the same danger of Cordeaux is up for grabs.

138
00:14:37,080 --> 00:14:40,760
The witches here know something that we already know.

139
00:14:40,760 --> 00:14:45,680
When we knew more than them, we were ahead of them in knowing this information.

140
00:14:45,680 --> 00:14:52,820
Maybe that makes them seem less powerful to us. Whereas they seem creepily omnipotent to Macbeth,

141
00:14:52,820 --> 00:15:00,890
particularly when having suggested that he will become Thane of Cawdor and ultimately King messengers immediately arrive from the King to greet him.

142
00:15:00,890 --> 00:15:08,480
Thane of Caudal to Macbeth. This makes the gap between prophecy and enactment fright frighteningly slender.

143
00:15:08,480 --> 00:15:14,900
But to us that is actually a gap between command. The King's words in Act one, scene two and fulfilment.

144
00:15:14,900 --> 00:15:20,990
The delivery of that message in the next scene to Macbeth, which is that's to say,

145
00:15:20,990 --> 00:15:27,110
seem to interpose in a chain of human actions rather than direct actions themselves.

146
00:15:27,110 --> 00:15:32,420
But on the other hand, we also know something that Macbeth doesn't. They'd already arranged to meet him on the heath.

147
00:15:32,420 --> 00:15:37,340
Maybe they are in control after all, in these three opening scenes.

148
00:15:37,340 --> 00:15:41,330
Then Shakespeare sets up one major aspect of the dilemma of agency.

149
00:15:41,330 --> 00:15:50,210
The play goes on to explore. Is Macbeth in control of his actions or are which witches now, too?

150
00:15:50,210 --> 00:15:55,340
Filmed versions of the opening of the play may help clarify what's at stake in this question,

151
00:15:55,340 --> 00:15:58,550
which is so explicitly posed here in these opening scenes,

152
00:15:58,550 --> 00:16:08,240
is a films by Orson Welles in 1948 and by Roman Polanski in 1971, both quite widely available.

153
00:16:08,240 --> 00:16:09,950
But I'm going to describe how they work.

154
00:16:09,950 --> 00:16:20,840
Anyway, Orson Welles begins his film with a shadowy image of three shapeless witches bent over a cauldron placed on top of a crag in a swirling,

155
00:16:20,840 --> 00:16:22,920
surreal landscape.

156
00:16:22,920 --> 00:16:33,710
And the film opens with this, them speaking in extremely dodgy Scots accents, the famous lines from four one double, double toil and trouble.

157
00:16:33,710 --> 00:16:40,580
And they list some of the monstrous ingredients of the potion over an extreme clip close up of the cauldron bubbling away.

158
00:16:40,580 --> 00:16:48,320
So the witch Mattel, for much later in the play is brought right to the beginning in Welles film lines from Act one,

159
00:16:48,320 --> 00:16:54,350
scene one to patched into this scene. So as they speak, they're to meet with Macbeth.

160
00:16:54,350 --> 00:17:02,410
The witches hands complete their moulding of a clay figurine from the contents of the cauldron.

161
00:17:02,410 --> 00:17:03,140
A climactic,

162
00:17:03,140 --> 00:17:11,960
rousing piece of music introduces the credit sequence and the next images of Macbeth and Banquo galloping through the same misty landscape,

163
00:17:11,960 --> 00:17:18,320
cutting to the witches by the pricking of my thumbs, something wicked this may comes.

164
00:17:18,320 --> 00:17:24,830
So Wells cuts the entirety of Act One scene to Shakespeare's discussion of the battle.

165
00:17:24,830 --> 00:17:28,520
That means that the witches deliver their prophecies and are driven away when the

166
00:17:28,520 --> 00:17:33,140
messengers arrive who bring news of Macbeth's elevation to the thayn them of caudal.

167
00:17:33,140 --> 00:17:40,610
But that's the first we know of it the film, because the discussion of why that's happened in one two has been cut.

168
00:17:40,610 --> 00:17:45,770
The badge of office is taken from the neck of the wretched prisoner and passed to Macbeth,

169
00:17:45,770 --> 00:17:52,400
whose asides are delivered as voiceovers against a close up of his troubled face.

170
00:17:52,400 --> 00:17:56,090
As with any text, and there are a number of ways to interpret Welles direction here.

171
00:17:56,090 --> 00:18:02,510
But one result of his catching and arranging seems to be that the witches have more power.

172
00:18:02,510 --> 00:18:07,880
They make an image of Macbeth from that cauldron as if he is their creature.

173
00:18:07,880 --> 00:18:15,920
The film is sometimes called the Voodoo Macbeth, and it certainly makes use of a little a kind of figurine of a person to which things can be done,

174
00:18:15,920 --> 00:18:24,800
which have consequences to the physical body of that person. The clay model of Macbeth is used by Welles later in the film,

175
00:18:24,800 --> 00:18:32,570
including a striking cut away from Macbeth to the image of the figurine right at the moment when Mark Duff cuts his head off.

176
00:18:32,570 --> 00:18:42,020
So what happens is that the head of the figurine is cut off. It is on camera, not the head of Macbeth himself.

177
00:18:42,020 --> 00:18:47,360
By omitting the scene, which explains the rational political reason for Macbeth's promotion,

178
00:18:47,360 --> 00:18:53,630
the rational political reason is that he has been a brave and loyal warrior, whereas the thane of Cawdor has been a traitor.

179
00:18:53,630 --> 00:19:01,040
News of his elevation comes as a surprise in Wells film. The audience does not have prior knowledge as it does in Shakespeare's play.

180
00:19:01,040 --> 00:19:06,280
And thus, perhaps we share with Macbeth a sense of the which witches power in wells its film.

181
00:19:06,280 --> 00:19:11,810
They predict something and immediately it happens. So Wells is answer I think would have to be.

182
00:19:11,810 --> 00:19:21,360
It is the witches who make things happen. If we were to compare this version of the opening scenes with that of Roman Polanski,

183
00:19:21,360 --> 00:19:27,780
Roman Polanski, we can see some interesting differences of emphasis.

184
00:19:27,780 --> 00:19:36,610
Polanski places the first, which seen as a kind of prologue, separated from the rest of the film by the opening credits sequence.

185
00:19:36,610 --> 00:19:41,820
A pink dawn lightens on a damp beach. The tide is out.

186
00:19:41,820 --> 00:19:46,890
And on the sand, a group of three women dig silently in the wet ground,

187
00:19:46,890 --> 00:19:53,280
performing a ritual burial of a noose under disserved arm, which holds a dagger.

188
00:19:53,280 --> 00:20:03,450
They speak the lines of Act one, scene one. The atmosphere is heavy and mysterious, but there's none of Welles's melodramatic mist or shadows.

189
00:20:03,450 --> 00:20:08,910
As the credits run, we hear the noise of battle. Horseback charges, the clash of swords.

190
00:20:08,910 --> 00:20:15,690
Men shouting. The scene opens to the up to the aftermath of the battle on that same stretch of beach.

191
00:20:15,690 --> 00:20:24,420
The soldiers move amongst the dead. One casualty stirs only to be brutally clubbed to death in the sand.

192
00:20:24,420 --> 00:20:28,910
The king arrives on horseback with a fanfare to hear the news of the battle.

193
00:20:28,910 --> 00:20:31,590
Cordeaux is brought in bleeding.

194
00:20:31,590 --> 00:20:38,890
The king uses his sword point to tape a chain of office from him and to hand it to his messengers for delivery to Macbeth.

195
00:20:38,890 --> 00:20:41,840
A moody close up of Macbeth in front of the gallows.

196
00:20:41,840 --> 00:20:48,980
Being prepared for Korder isn't quite the image of the triumphant image of Balón as bridegroom that we've heard about.

197
00:20:48,980 --> 00:20:55,370
He and Banquo are sheltering from the rain when they hear the witch is singing and go and seek them out.

198
00:20:55,370 --> 00:21:03,170
The witches don't seem particularly interested to see them, and they deliver their prophecies in a very offhand way.

199
00:21:03,170 --> 00:21:07,840
Now the keynote of Polanski's film is Violence and Blood.

200
00:21:07,840 --> 00:21:15,560
A.C. Bradley wrote that Macbeth leaves a decided impression of colour and that colour is the colour of blood.

201
00:21:15,560 --> 00:21:25,010
And in these opening scenes, Polanski steeps the palette in red from the dawn sky to the file of blood sprinkled on the witches burial.

202
00:21:25,010 --> 00:21:30,710
The wounded face of the captain. The blood on the back of the soldier being club to death on the beach.

203
00:21:30,710 --> 00:21:40,970
The King's pennants decorated in her Valdek red. In this, we might think Polanski translates the dominant mood of Macbeth's language.

204
00:21:40,970 --> 00:21:45,560
The word blood and it's cognates appear more than 40 times in Macbeth.

205
00:21:45,560 --> 00:21:51,080
It's much the most frequently. It's the play which is most frequently used.

206
00:21:51,080 --> 00:21:57,350
So we might say that Polanski is trying to translate that linguistic texture into the visual palette film offers.

207
00:21:57,350 --> 00:22:07,610
But what's interesting here is that this is a violence strongly associated with the world before Macbeth kills the king.

208
00:22:07,610 --> 00:22:18,200
Sometimes a rather sentimental view of Macbeth prevails, in which the murder of Duncan is the act which sets everything in the kingdom at odds.

209
00:22:18,200 --> 00:22:25,760
But prolonged Polanski shows us a world, by contrast, which is entirely built on the valuation of male violence,

210
00:22:25,760 --> 00:22:38,190
one in which Duncan's power, as well as Macbeth in turn relies on the violent, relies on violence, not on some sense of right.

211
00:22:38,190 --> 00:22:42,500
In this, it seems that for Polanski, the witches have rather less influence,

212
00:22:42,500 --> 00:22:49,880
even while they're presented as less explicitly supernatural than they are in Welles version.

213
00:22:49,880 --> 00:22:58,250
In his interpretation, then, it seems that Polanski turns Shakespeare's play to the sources from which Shakespeare took it.

214
00:22:58,250 --> 00:23:03,410
Last week, on a measure for measure, I was talking about the difficulty of bending the story,

215
00:23:03,410 --> 00:23:08,790
bending the story as a phrase from the epic phrase about playwriting, from the epilogue to Henry the Fifth.

216
00:23:08,790 --> 00:23:16,000
The difficulty of bending the story into a comic shape from which it seemed always struggling to escape.

217
00:23:16,000 --> 00:23:18,800
And also I talked about the way in which the source is ending,

218
00:23:18,800 --> 00:23:24,920
in which Isabella and Angelo get married still makes its presence felt in Shakespeare's play,

219
00:23:24,920 --> 00:23:29,070
even where he is substantially rewriting that, ending the source.

220
00:23:29,070 --> 00:23:33,740
That's to say, retained a sort of ghostly hold over the material.

221
00:23:33,740 --> 00:23:40,890
And perhaps the same might be said of Macbeth. Shakespeare takes this story from Holland, Chadds Chronicles.

222
00:23:40,890 --> 00:23:44,700
So that's the source for his English. History plays.

223
00:23:44,700 --> 00:23:52,490
And it's interesting to think how history and tragedy are interwoven in Shakespeare's imagination.

224
00:23:52,490 --> 00:23:56,630
What makes a what makes the story of the decline of a king,

225
00:23:56,630 --> 00:24:02,690
the sort of day Karzi best definition of tragedy from the mediaeval period, the downfall of a of a king?

226
00:24:02,690 --> 00:24:11,040
What makes that sometimes historical part of a process of continuity and change and sometimes tragic?

227
00:24:11,040 --> 00:24:17,510
The story at an end stop story which has no future beyond the decline of the individual.

228
00:24:17,510 --> 00:24:24,080
So sometimes Shakespeare uses a kind of day Kassebaum structure as part of a historical sequence which is going to continue,

229
00:24:24,080 --> 00:24:31,310
which can sustain the downfall of an individual. And it turns its attention to other characters in the in the story.

230
00:24:31,310 --> 00:24:36,960
Sometimes he uses it as a completely tragic structure in which wants the once the prince has fallen.

231
00:24:36,960 --> 00:24:43,440
There's no interest in anything else in the play and no way of going forward.

232
00:24:43,440 --> 00:24:48,420
Here, Shakespeare turns the story the day, Kasie, big story into a tragedy.

233
00:24:48,420 --> 00:24:53,940
But it's not, as we might expect, the tragedy of the king who is cut down.

234
00:24:53,940 --> 00:24:59,420
But that of his use upper. So Macbeth is the opposite of Richard the second.

235
00:24:59,420 --> 00:25:07,560
It's a Richard the second rewritten from the point of view of the challenger, not of the not not of the king.

236
00:25:07,560 --> 00:25:12,540
And so Shakespeare, I think, is revisiting some ground. He's already covered in history plays.

237
00:25:12,540 --> 00:25:21,530
My bet is a much better play looked at along side of history plays, I think, than alongside the so-called great tragedies.

238
00:25:21,530 --> 00:25:31,860
And the way Shakespeare does this is to try to sacrifice the story he gets from the history of Scotland in the historical sources in Holland shed.

239
00:25:31,860 --> 00:25:41,160
Macbeth emerges as king of Scotland out of a violent dog eat dog world of different thanes jockeying for position and power.

240
00:25:41,160 --> 00:25:45,780
Duncan had done this in his term, but had now grown weak.

241
00:25:45,780 --> 00:25:56,010
Macbeth's rise, supported in the sources by Banquo, is the inevitable change of ruler in a society that has no principle of rule other than strength.

242
00:25:56,010 --> 00:26:04,440
So the mightiest is this is the best. The strongest is the best in the Scotland historical Scotland that's being depicted in the in the sources.

243
00:26:04,440 --> 00:26:08,370
If you've seen the modernised television version of the play Macbeth on the estate,

244
00:26:08,370 --> 00:26:13,410
you might recognise this from there interpolated prologue to the story.

245
00:26:13,410 --> 00:26:22,530
So Macbeth takes power in the sources from a weakened warlord and has power taken from him in due course by another warlord.

246
00:26:22,530 --> 00:26:29,160
He is not in the sources under Shakespeare makes him the regicide who takes the crown from a holy king?

247
00:26:29,160 --> 00:26:39,420
Duncan. Remember the description of Duncan's silver skin laced with his golden blood is a kind of saintly,

248
00:26:39,420 --> 00:26:46,410
almost sob more than human superhuman figure in that description.

249
00:26:46,410 --> 00:26:52,060
The regicide in Shakespeare's play is a crime against nature itself.

250
00:26:52,060 --> 00:26:59,620
The sense of moral outrage and disturbance in Shakespeare's play is entirely his invention.

251
00:26:59,620 --> 00:27:07,870
And he turns his sources into a play in which rightful succession is interrupted by the terrible, ambitious agency of Macbeth.

252
00:27:07,870 --> 00:27:13,410
So Macbeth is a single person who upsets the way things ought to be.

253
00:27:13,410 --> 00:27:19,590
That's that's as a parable of individual agency in the resources.

254
00:27:19,590 --> 00:27:22,810
It is sorry in the play rather than as we get in.

255
00:27:22,810 --> 00:27:30,910
The source is a story of political instability in which might not write always rules.

256
00:27:30,910 --> 00:27:39,220
I think there are no remainders and reminders of the world of the sources that politically unstable, violent world of the sources.

257
00:27:39,220 --> 00:27:49,300
It is still in Macbeth. And the vivid example, most vivid example, I think, is the description of Macbeth in the battle in Act one, scene two.

258
00:27:49,300 --> 00:27:59,680
Before we've even met Macbeth, the captain described his capacity for extreme ruthlessness from wanting to brave Macbeth.

259
00:27:59,680 --> 00:28:07,600
Well, he deserves that name. Disdaining fortune with his brandy steel, which smoked with bloody execution.

260
00:28:07,600 --> 00:28:14,320
Like Vallas, Minion carved out his passage till he faced the slave, which now shook hands.

261
00:28:14,320 --> 00:28:24,150
No bayed farewell to him, to the unseemly him from the nave to the chops and fixed his head upon our battlements.

262
00:28:24,150 --> 00:28:32,860
King Duncan's reply. Oh, Valiante cousin worthy gentleman makes clear that he approves Shakespeare's Macbeth is at this

263
00:28:32,860 --> 00:28:40,360
point like his avatar in Hollin shed a man who has gained power through extreme violence.

264
00:28:40,360 --> 00:28:46,940
What changes is not that he becomes violent. It's not that violence enters the peaceful world of Scotland.

265
00:28:46,940 --> 00:28:55,030
It's rather that that violence is turned against rather than for the sovereign.

266
00:28:55,030 --> 00:28:58,120
In this, we might think that Macbeth does not mean the witches.

267
00:28:58,120 --> 00:29:03,910
I've already described the story that Shakespeare tells us as a parable of individual agency in which

268
00:29:03,910 --> 00:29:15,650
one person's unwillingness or refusal to be to stay in his allotted place overturns the natural order.

269
00:29:15,650 --> 00:29:20,690
In Holland shed, the witches play a very minor role, and it's largely the role of prophecy.

270
00:29:20,690 --> 00:29:26,240
Those are very, very interesting picture of the witches in Holland Shared, which is an illustrated book.

271
00:29:26,240 --> 00:29:34,650
Well worth having a look at where they're three very neatly dressed to the sort of chuda ladies or Mennonite mediaeval ladies.

272
00:29:34,650 --> 00:29:47,840
They're not a tall hags or no war or those kind of which witchy signifiers that they're that they look quite different from what we might expect.

273
00:29:47,840 --> 00:29:51,530
So they play a role of prophecy of RA, rather a minor role of prosit prophecy.

274
00:29:51,530 --> 00:29:57,260
They know what will happen. Shakespeare has developed their role for the play.

275
00:29:57,260 --> 00:30:06,590
And we also think that Middleton has added further to that the scene with Haggerty's taken from Middleton's play The Witch.

276
00:30:06,590 --> 00:30:14,030
And that suggests that the witch scenes are popular and enjoyable on the stage and that the more witch material that can be put into the play,

277
00:30:14,030 --> 00:30:22,660
the better. DIAM Perkis has written compellingly about how the Macbeth witches are palimpsest of different witch beliefs,

278
00:30:22,660 --> 00:30:29,000
the equivalent perhaps of those incompatible lines of arguments and analysis in Robert Burton's Anatomy of Melancholy,

279
00:30:29,000 --> 00:30:36,260
with which we began, the witches identified themselves as having rather limited powers.

280
00:30:36,260 --> 00:30:40,760
The punishment of the husband Sayler husband of the woman who would not share her chestnut's,

281
00:30:40,760 --> 00:30:50,180
for example, that day, which you say that the they'll his ship can't be lost.

282
00:30:50,180 --> 00:30:54,500
They can't kill him. He's gone to see the tiger, the ship, the tiger.

283
00:30:54,500 --> 00:30:58,790
They can't do anything really serious to him. But they're going to make some really bad weather.

284
00:30:58,790 --> 00:31:02,300
That's pretty much what they say. Though his bark cannot be lost yet.

285
00:31:02,300 --> 00:31:05,180
It shall be. Tempest tossed.

286
00:31:05,180 --> 00:31:14,120
So they've got a limited amount of influence and a rather different sphere of influence, one might think, from the government of a country.

287
00:31:14,120 --> 00:31:19,220
Strikingly, there is no return for the witches at the conclusion of the play.

288
00:31:19,220 --> 00:31:23,780
They open it, but they do not, in Shakespeare's text conclude it.

289
00:31:23,780 --> 00:31:31,480
Although many productions, including both the films I just mentioned by Polanski and by Welles, reintroduced them at the end.

290
00:31:31,480 --> 00:31:36,740
That Shakespeare does not make suggests that they are not active agents,

291
00:31:36,740 --> 00:31:43,160
but passive predictors of how things will turn out and that things do turn out the way they are predicted is sufficient.

292
00:31:43,160 --> 00:31:51,810
They don't need also to be there. And in any case, perhaps we should not take the witches to literally.

293
00:31:51,810 --> 00:32:00,950
It's often asserted that the early modern theatre left long behind it mediaeval forms of Psycho Maciek Theatre p.

294
00:32:00,950 --> 00:32:05,500
S y c h o m a c h i a.

295
00:32:05,500 --> 00:32:16,140
The psycho mark here Psychosomatic Theatre saw the play's characters representing not complete and separate individual human beings,

296
00:32:16,140 --> 00:32:25,980
but qualities or personifications, giving the whole drama the sense of taking place within a single mind pulled in different directions.

297
00:32:25,980 --> 00:32:34,950
We're always told that this form of theatre was abandoned by the newly realist psychological models of the early modern stage.

298
00:32:34,950 --> 00:32:42,120
I'm not sure that this is entirely true, that we did leave behind, that the early modern stage does leave entirely behind psychometric theatre.

299
00:32:42,120 --> 00:32:45,360
Or rather, I think it's the case that, as Shakespeare writes,

300
00:32:45,360 --> 00:32:52,440
we can see him experimenting with different ways of creating character through dialogue and through a soliloquy,

301
00:32:52,440 --> 00:33:03,210
to be sure, but also through foils and duplications and perhaps by splitting a single psychology between different figures on the stage.

302
00:33:03,210 --> 00:33:14,730
In this reading, we could see Argo as a part of Othello or Laertes as a part of Hamlet or the witches of Macbeth.

303
00:33:14,730 --> 00:33:23,680
They the witches speak out his ambition. They make it audible and therefore they're extremely important in a in in a drama.

304
00:33:23,680 --> 00:33:32,670
How would we know what Macbeth wanted? If no one speaks it on the stage and what the witches do is to speak that for him.

305
00:33:32,670 --> 00:33:40,710
Perhaps we should think of them less as separate agents and more a strange internal voices which direct his actions,

306
00:33:40,710 --> 00:33:52,210
which are externalised on the stage in some sense for our benefit as as as a model of psychological projection.

307
00:33:52,210 --> 00:33:56,210
OK. So so far, I've spent a fair amount of time on the play's opening,

308
00:33:56,210 --> 00:34:03,590
largely because it establishes a number of ways in which agency is questioned and problematise between the human

309
00:34:03,590 --> 00:34:09,530
and the supernatural realms are not going to see much more of the witches after the first 20 minutes of the play.

310
00:34:09,530 --> 00:34:13,680
So it's a very active sense way of setting up the dilemma.

311
00:34:13,680 --> 00:34:23,370
The dilemma of agency right at the beginning of the play. And those questions, it's important to acknowledge, have all been raised before.

312
00:34:23,370 --> 00:34:28,170
The figure who was probably taken most of the flak for what happens in the play is even introduced.

313
00:34:28,170 --> 00:34:40,140
That figure is, of course, Lady Macbeth. The idea that Lady Macbeth takes over Macbeth and makes him act has been a compelling one and one which often

314
00:34:40,140 --> 00:34:48,030
brings criticism into an apparently willing participation with the play's own fear of women and a female power.

315
00:34:48,030 --> 00:34:54,000
We probably all know the outlines of this argument that in calling on devilish spirits when she reads Macbeth

316
00:34:54,000 --> 00:35:00,990
letter telling her about the witches and using highly charged metaphorical vocabulary about suckling children,

317
00:35:00,990 --> 00:35:04,600
nobody would have written a lot of analysis of Lady Macbeth.

318
00:35:04,600 --> 00:35:14,010
You wouldn't realise that this is just a figure of speech. Usage hasn't actually dashed any babies, at least not so far as we know.

319
00:35:14,010 --> 00:35:23,520
And in demeaning maths, my best masculinity so thoroughly and in planning the murder so as to frame the grooms that in all of this,

320
00:35:23,520 --> 00:35:28,200
Lady Macbeth makes her unwilling husband go through with a murderous act,

321
00:35:28,200 --> 00:35:37,490
which is always really against his better judgement, that milk of human kindness that she herself recognises.

322
00:35:37,490 --> 00:35:42,170
Certainly, this is a cluster of activity by Lady Macbeth in the first half of the play.

323
00:35:42,170 --> 00:35:47,060
And it prevents it presents her as a powerful female agent.

324
00:35:47,060 --> 00:35:53,360
It's striking the extent to which criticism has found this threatening.

325
00:35:53,360 --> 00:35:59,000
If we find Macbeth a misogynistic play, which is deeply distrustful of powerful women,

326
00:35:59,000 --> 00:36:06,320
we may see this as a further aspect of Shakespeare's direct address to the company's new patron, King James.

327
00:36:06,320 --> 00:36:14,030
And therefore, the representation of Lady Macbeth, like the Scottish setting, like the whitewash recuperation of Banquo,

328
00:36:14,030 --> 00:36:19,400
whom James counted as his ancestor and who therefore had to be cleared of any wrongdoing

329
00:36:19,400 --> 00:36:24,260
in Shakespeare's telling of the story and the interest in witches for a king who,

330
00:36:24,260 --> 00:36:27,170
as we know, had written a work called demonology,

331
00:36:27,170 --> 00:36:37,610
these become all parts of the play's pitch for royal approval in the newly insignificantly homosocial world of James's court.

332
00:36:37,610 --> 00:36:45,230
It's always, of course, impossible to know how plays almost always impossible to know how plays were received by their first audiences.

333
00:36:45,230 --> 00:36:53,660
But we do have, or at least we think we have an unusual contemporary account of Macbeth in early modern performance.

334
00:36:53,660 --> 00:37:02,510
The visit of the astrologer, a medicine man, Simon Foreman, to the globe in the spring of sixteen eleven.

335
00:37:02,510 --> 00:37:08,660
Simon Foreman writes about his visit to the to the theatre in terms that have been very problematic for critics.

336
00:37:08,660 --> 00:37:17,630
And it's certainly a source that should use with some caution. For example, he begins by saying that Macbeth and Banquo are riding through the forest.

337
00:37:17,630 --> 00:37:24,290
It's quite hard to think how that really worked on the stage. Doesn't seem like a description of a of a staged play.

338
00:37:24,290 --> 00:37:27,950
But what other things Simon Foreman really enjoys about bang,

339
00:37:27,950 --> 00:37:34,100
about about Macbeth is the scene where the ghost of Banquo sits in Macbeth seat at the banquet.

340
00:37:34,100 --> 00:37:41,810
This is this is the bit from his notebooks. The next night, being at supper with his nobleman, whom he had bid to a feast to the witch.

341
00:37:41,810 --> 00:37:48,260
Also, Banquo should have come. He began to speak of Noble Banquo and to wish that he were there.

342
00:37:48,260 --> 00:37:52,340
And as he thus did, standing up to drink a caroused to him.

343
00:37:52,340 --> 00:37:59,900
The ghost of Banquo came and sat down in his chair behind him, and he turning about to sit down again, saw the ghost of Banquo,

344
00:37:59,900 --> 00:38:06,680
which fronted him so that he fell into a great passion of fear and fury, uttering many words about his murder.

345
00:38:06,680 --> 00:38:12,640
By which, when they heard that map that Banquo was murdered, they suspected Macbeth.

346
00:38:12,640 --> 00:38:21,250
The most vivid part of the play for Foreman. Interesting. It was a very interesting focus on a very particular element of business.

347
00:38:21,250 --> 00:38:25,970
Why is it that Banquo is a Macbeth's Macbeth chair?

348
00:38:25,970 --> 00:38:33,110
Why isn't he in his own? Why isn't he in his own seat? Which would seem much more compelling in certain ways.

349
00:38:33,110 --> 00:38:38,540
Earlier, though, in his account, Simon Foreman suggests usefully for what I'm trying to argue today,

350
00:38:38,540 --> 00:38:44,570
both that Macbeth is responsible for killing Duncan and that Lady Macbeth is.

351
00:38:44,570 --> 00:38:55,490
This is what he says. And Macbeth contrived to kill Duncan and through the persuasion of his wife, did that night murder the king in his own castle.

352
00:38:55,490 --> 00:39:03,970
Macbeth contrived to kill Duncan and through the persuasion of his wife, did that night murder the king in his own castle.

353
00:39:03,970 --> 00:39:12,410
Foreman's sense here that Macbeth, contrived by active verb given to Macbeth and Lady Macbeth persuades may suggest

354
00:39:12,410 --> 00:39:16,460
a confusion about agency from the very start of the reception of this play,

355
00:39:16,460 --> 00:39:22,430
very much like the one we are exploring, the murder of Duncan thus becomes overdetermined.

356
00:39:22,430 --> 00:39:27,830
It has too many rather than too few agents.

357
00:39:27,830 --> 00:39:38,040
But Foreman may also suggest a kind of synergy in this, which is Shakespeare's only portrait of an operative adult marriage in process.

358
00:39:38,040 --> 00:39:47,960
Is at the best of the only couple, really we see. So his relationship and his marriage is dealt with in any detail at all.

359
00:39:47,960 --> 00:39:55,620
Separating out who does what may therefore undo what Shakespeare may be trying to present a passionate folly, Adir,

360
00:39:55,620 --> 00:40:07,700
perhaps committed by a partnership in which separating out culpability misreads the dynamic of what has been written saying as readers often do.

361
00:40:07,700 --> 00:40:13,640
I don't think Macbeth would have done it if she hadn't goaded him into it is, of course,

362
00:40:13,640 --> 00:40:18,290
to mistake this literary artefact for a real event, which could have turned out differently.

363
00:40:18,290 --> 00:40:24,680
It isn't, but it is a question whose naivete I think the play encourages rather than disavowals.

364
00:40:24,680 --> 00:40:31,940
I think the play encourages us to ask whether Macbeth would have done it had Lady Macbeth not goaded him into doing it and

365
00:40:31,940 --> 00:40:40,280
can't possibly give us an answer because there isn't a counterfactual version of the story in which that doesn't happen.

366
00:40:40,280 --> 00:40:47,540
Like all those questions that we've been thinking about this term, it can only be asked and not answered.

367
00:40:47,540 --> 00:40:54,290
Lady Macbeth particular characterisation, her active calling up of those spirits to unsexy her,

368
00:40:54,290 --> 00:41:01,280
her revealing use of the possessive, my battlements and her ongoing fascination for actors and critics.

369
00:41:01,280 --> 00:41:06,290
These all suggest a particular form of agency and activity on her part.

370
00:41:06,290 --> 00:41:10,520
But her collapse after the murderous events and her marginalisation,

371
00:41:10,520 --> 00:41:20,300
both from Macbeth further plots and from Shakespeare's, quickly erases the significance of her agency, Macbeth.

372
00:41:20,300 --> 00:41:24,520
Judgement is of a dead butcher. The Macbeth who seems so.

373
00:41:24,520 --> 00:41:32,420
So Malcolm's judgement is of a dead butcher. The Macbeth one seems from the Nate to the chops and the fiend like Queen.

374
00:41:32,420 --> 00:41:34,130
But like so many of those figures,

375
00:41:34,130 --> 00:41:42,740
you might think of Fortum Brass or Octavius Caesar figures who step delicately onto the corpse strewn stage at the end of a tragedy.

376
00:41:42,740 --> 00:41:51,250
Malcolm's analysis is politicised, self-interested and fundamentally anticlimactic.

377
00:41:51,250 --> 00:41:58,790
If Shakespeare asks the question of Lady Macbeth agency in the play, he seems to disavow an answer, as he could have done.

378
00:41:58,790 --> 00:42:04,700
He doesn't, for example, show her to be motivated by greed. She never once expresses the wish to be queen.

379
00:42:04,700 --> 00:42:08,660
For example, he doesn't show her to be unfaithful,

380
00:42:08,660 --> 00:42:15,650
as he does say Tamara in Titus Andronicus or all the adulterous women in contemporary domestic tragedies,

381
00:42:15,650 --> 00:42:22,520
a genre with which Macbeth shares many characteristics. These are available shorthands for female wickedness.

382
00:42:22,520 --> 00:42:32,150
Greed, ambition and lust. None of which are attached explicitly to Lady Macbeth in the play.

383
00:42:32,150 --> 00:42:38,420
So like Macbeth. That's to say, I'd like the witches. Lady Macbeth has a claim to be the answer to the question.

384
00:42:38,420 --> 00:42:40,880
Who makes the things that happen happen?

385
00:42:40,880 --> 00:42:50,000
But the fact that there are so many other claimants keeps this question rather than its answers at the forefront.

386
00:42:50,000 --> 00:42:54,410
I want to finish with Macbeth himself. This is Macbeth at the end of the play.

387
00:42:54,410 --> 00:42:59,660
When Lady Macbeth has died and the witches prophecies have begun to unravel,

388
00:42:59,660 --> 00:43:06,800
it's a famous speech of resignation and futility and one that uses a striking metaphor for lives.

389
00:43:06,800 --> 00:43:15,080
But a walking shadow, a poor player that struts and frets his hour upon the stage and then is heard no more.

390
00:43:15,080 --> 00:43:24,140
It is a tale told by an idiot full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.

391
00:43:24,140 --> 00:43:33,940
Struggling here for an image. Macbeth, sitting on the stage in the Globe Theatre, lights on the image of the actor strutting and fretting.

392
00:43:33,940 --> 00:43:39,070
It's a common enough trope in the period the so the so-called TARP from Monday.

393
00:43:39,070 --> 00:43:48,280
All the world's a stage. But the uncertainty about the tone of the metaphore is, I think, crucial to questions about agency in this period.

394
00:43:48,280 --> 00:43:54,670
And one of the reasons why the theatre is so popular, it offers itself as a kind of epistemology,

395
00:43:54,670 --> 00:43:59,770
a way of knowing, a way of understanding the world for its period.

396
00:43:59,770 --> 00:44:03,790
Who or what makes the things happen in the theatre?

397
00:44:03,790 --> 00:44:11,380
Is it the physical bodies of the actors onstage moving and speaking to enact narrative and character?

398
00:44:11,380 --> 00:44:17,890
Is it the words penned by a playwright who may well be unknown to those who are watching?

399
00:44:17,890 --> 00:44:22,510
Is it the team of theatre personnel who make sure the play gets mounted?

400
00:44:22,510 --> 00:44:29,620
Is it in a more phenomenological sense, the audience who, by witnessing that things are happening, make them happen?

401
00:44:29,620 --> 00:44:38,170
A version of that old philosophical chestnut about the tree falling in the forest and being heard or not heard.

402
00:44:38,170 --> 00:44:44,920
Questions of agency are intrinsic to the theatre and thus to the metaphor of theatre within the drama.

403
00:44:44,920 --> 00:44:56,590
Macbeth does not, of course, end with this speech. The script has further to go, and when Macbeth vows to die with harness on her back on our back,

404
00:44:56,590 --> 00:45:03,450
die with harness on our back, and he agrees to fight Macduff. Yet I will try the last.

405
00:45:03,450 --> 00:45:07,600
Is he now in control of his actions in the very last moments of his life?

406
00:45:07,600 --> 00:45:13,420
Or is he merely working out a part that has already been written by which is prophecies,

407
00:45:13,420 --> 00:45:20,980
by historical, chronicle by audience expectations of tragedy by Shakespeare himself?

408
00:45:20,980 --> 00:45:29,020
I've tried to show that the question, but not the answer of agency is in a real sense the subject of its plot of this play,

409
00:45:29,020 --> 00:45:32,030
and that by thinking about it in relation to its sources,

410
00:45:32,030 --> 00:45:42,790
its cinematic iterations, its language and even its parodies, we can see how insistent and how unsettling is that interrogation.

411
00:45:42,790 --> 00:45:47,290
Next week is my final lecture, and I'm going to be discussing The Winter's Tale.

412
00:45:47,290 --> 00:45:52,270
If these lectures weren't being recorded, my question would be double UTF.

413
00:45:52,270 --> 00:45:57,930
But it is more acceptable version. The question I have to ask about The Winter's Tale is why.

414
00:45:57,930 --> 00:46:00,516
Thank you.