1
00:00:02,680 --> 00:00:11,380
Good afternoon, all. And welcome to this book at lunchtime event on commemorative modernism as women writers Death and the First World War.

2
00:00:11,380 --> 00:00:18,220
Written by Dr. Alice Kelly. My name's Professor Wes Williams and I am the director here at Torch.

3
00:00:18,220 --> 00:00:22,210
I'm delighted to welcome Dr Alice Kelly today to speak about her new book.

4
00:00:22,210 --> 00:00:32,110
And also on the panel are Professor Michael Whitworth. Professor Jay Winter and Dr. Laura Rattray, who will be chairing the discussion this lunchtime.

5
00:00:32,110 --> 00:00:37,180
It's a great pleasure to be here to introduce the second book at lunchtime of this academic year.

6
00:00:37,180 --> 00:00:40,090
Book at lunch time is Torture's flagship event series,

7
00:00:40,090 --> 00:00:46,330
taking the form of more or less weekly bite sized book discussions with a range of commentators.

8
00:00:46,330 --> 00:00:50,500
Please do take a look at the website, a newsletter for the full programme.

9
00:00:50,500 --> 00:00:58,390
I'll start proceedings today with a few words of introduction to the book and why we've chosen it for one of our book at lunchtime sessions.

10
00:00:58,390 --> 00:01:05,710
Commemorative Modernism offers a new way of thinking about modernist writing by being the first sustained study of women's

11
00:01:05,710 --> 00:01:13,180
literary representations of death and the culture of commemoration that underlies both British and American modernism.

12
00:01:13,180 --> 00:01:21,490
Drawing on international archival research and previously neglected writing by women in the war zones and at home,

13
00:01:21,490 --> 00:01:24,610
as well as the marginalised writings of well-known authors.

14
00:01:24,610 --> 00:01:31,740
This book both demonstrates the intertwining, intertwining of literary modernism, war and material,

15
00:01:31,740 --> 00:01:39,400
a memorial culture and extends our understanding of the canon of modernist writing more generally.

16
00:01:39,400 --> 00:01:45,640
In a moment, I will hand over to Laura Rattray, who will introduce the book more fully, as well as the rest of the panel.

17
00:01:45,640 --> 00:01:50,220
This will be followed by a brief reading by Alice from the book.

18
00:01:50,220 --> 00:01:56,970
Afterwards, our commentators will present their thoughts on the book, approaching it from their particular disciplines.

19
00:01:56,970 --> 00:02:04,970
Will then give us the chance to respond to some of the points raised before entering into what promises to be a fascinating discussion.

20
00:02:04,970 --> 00:02:09,410
The event will conclude with questions from you, the audience, so please do.

21
00:02:09,410 --> 00:02:17,240
Add them to the chat box function as we go along and I'll moderate a question and answer session towards the end of our hour.

22
00:02:17,240 --> 00:02:22,760
All that's left for me now, then, is to thank you all for coming and to introduce our chair.

23
00:02:22,760 --> 00:02:31,760
Laura Rattray is reader in American Literature at the University of Glasgow and director of the Glasgow Centre for American Studies.

24
00:02:31,760 --> 00:02:36,770
Welcome, Laura. She's teaching and research interests in modern American literature and culture.

25
00:02:36,770 --> 00:02:42,020
Women's writing and gender editing and publishing history. In 2016,

26
00:02:42,020 --> 00:02:51,030
she founded the Transatlantic Literary Women Series funded by the British Association for American Studies and U.S. Embassy Small Grants Programme.

27
00:02:51,030 --> 00:02:58,260
Publications include 21st Century Readings of Tender is the Night coedited with William Blazek,

28
00:02:58,260 --> 00:03:05,300
the new Edith Wharton series credited with Jennifer Haydock and the unpublished writings of Edith Wharton.

29
00:03:05,300 --> 00:03:12,300
While her new monograph, Edith Wharton and Genre Beyond Fiction, is published by Palgrave Macmillan.

30
00:03:12,300 --> 00:03:17,460
Welcome, Laura, once again. And over to you now for the rest of the next part of the session, at least.

31
00:03:17,460 --> 00:03:22,260
Thank you. Thank you very much. And it's a pleasure to be here today.

32
00:03:22,260 --> 00:03:32,790
Sharing the discussion of Dr Alice Kelly's Hot Off the Press new book, Commemorative Modern Isms, Women Writers Death and the First World War,

33
00:03:32,790 --> 00:03:40,300
a beautifully written, broad ranging study that puts women writers at the heart of its investigation.

34
00:03:40,300 --> 00:03:48,900
And it's my privilege to introduce Dr Kelly and our speakers. Dr Kelly is a part time lecturer in American literature at the University of

35
00:03:48,900 --> 00:03:54,950
Sussex and also the communications officer at the Welcome Mat American Institute,

36
00:03:54,950 --> 00:04:02,460
the University of Oxford. And after her PHC at Cambridge and a Fox Fellowship at Yale University,

37
00:04:02,460 --> 00:04:09,450
Genitally joins everyone at Torch in 2015 as a woman in the humanities writing Salib

38
00:04:09,450 --> 00:04:16,350
before becoming a Harmsworth junior research fellow Obermaier American Institute.

39
00:04:16,350 --> 00:04:25,080
Her research focuses on 20th century literature and cultural history in Britain and America, as well as commemorative modern isms.

40
00:04:25,080 --> 00:04:29,530
Alice has published a critical edition of Edith Wharton's First World War called

41
00:04:29,530 --> 00:04:36,030
Touch Fighting France and essays on Modernist and First World War literature.

42
00:04:36,030 --> 00:04:39,090
She's held a remark fellowship at New York University.

43
00:04:39,090 --> 00:04:49,620
She's also been a British Academy rising star for her interdisciplinary seminar series, which many of us know cultures and commemorations of war.

44
00:04:49,620 --> 00:04:58,730
And in 2015, she set up the torch academic writing group, still going strong today in the virtual format.

45
00:04:58,730 --> 00:05:04,490
Professor Michael Whitworth is professor of modern literature and culture at the University of Oxford.

46
00:05:04,490 --> 00:05:10,790
He's published his thinking extensively on Virginia Woolf with his most recent work, An Addition of Virginia Wolves.

47
00:05:10,790 --> 00:05:14,770
Night and Day for Cambridge University Press.

48
00:05:14,770 --> 00:05:25,040
His previous publications include Einsteins, Wake, Relativity, Metaphore and Modernist Literature and chapters on Oliver Lodge's science writing.

49
00:05:25,040 --> 00:05:31,910
And he's currently working on a project concerning science, poetry and specialisation.

50
00:05:31,910 --> 00:05:43,130
In the early 20th century. And finally, Jay Winter is the Charles Jay, still professor of history emeritus at Yale University.

51
00:05:43,130 --> 00:05:48,740
He's a specialist on World War One and its impact on the 20th century.

52
00:05:48,740 --> 00:05:58,520
And previously, Jay taught at Hebrew University of Jerusalem, the University of Warwick University of Cambridge and Columbia University.

53
00:05:58,520 --> 00:06:06,660
In 20, 2001, he joined the faculty of Yale, and he's the author or co-author of twenty five books,

54
00:06:06,660 --> 00:06:12,270
including Socialism and the Challenge of War Ideas and Politics in Britain.

55
00:06:12,270 --> 00:06:19,530
Sights of Memories, Sights of mourning, great war in European Cultural History, and most recently,

56
00:06:19,530 --> 00:06:29,650
well beyond words, languages of remembrance, from the Great War to the present.

57
00:06:29,650 --> 00:06:33,220
And I'm not going to invite Alice, Dr. Alice Kelly.

58
00:06:33,220 --> 00:06:39,260
Probably is going to get a reading from her book Commemorative Modernism set for Over You, please, Alice.

59
00:06:39,260 --> 00:06:46,030
Thank you. Thank you very much, Laura.

60
00:06:46,030 --> 00:06:50,890
Thank you very much. To talks torch oxfords for hosting this event.

61
00:06:50,890 --> 00:06:57,820
And to my three brilliant panellists, not just for participating today, but for their encouragement,

62
00:06:57,820 --> 00:07:02,530
their advice and their support of this project's over the many years that I've been working

63
00:07:02,530 --> 00:07:08,680
on it and support that's range from reading chapters to mentoring to writing many,

64
00:07:08,680 --> 00:07:13,750
many reference letters for fellowships and jobs. So thank you very much.

65
00:07:13,750 --> 00:07:23,520
I'm going to begin at the beginning of the book and read from the first few pages and I'll show some of the images I include in the book while I read.

66
00:07:23,520 --> 00:07:33,120
Introduction coaches surcharged with death. One of the key questions of modern literature was the problem of what to do with the war dead.

67
00:07:33,120 --> 00:07:41,280
In March 1915, just eight months into the First World War, in a paper delivered in Vienna, Sigmund Freud presciently noted that,

68
00:07:41,280 --> 00:07:48,390
quote, We cannot maintain a former attitude towards death and have not yet discovered a new one.

69
00:07:48,390 --> 00:07:57,090
Freud expressed a common sentiment that the ongoing war had already fundamentally changed the ways that people thought about death.

70
00:07:57,090 --> 00:08:04,860
The accompanying questions of how to bury, memorialise and grieve the dead began as soon as the war itself did.

71
00:08:04,860 --> 00:08:10,770
In August 1914 and would continue long into the post-war period.

72
00:08:10,770 --> 00:08:16,410
This book is about the ways that women writers wrote about death during and after the First World War.

73
00:08:16,410 --> 00:08:18,690
It examines the impact to the vast,

74
00:08:18,690 --> 00:08:26,760
unanticipated mortality on literary representations of death in British and American writing during and immediately after the war.

75
00:08:26,760 --> 00:08:30,960
It considers the particular role that women writers played in enacting,

76
00:08:30,960 --> 00:08:36,720
rehearsing and mediating the crisis and attitude towards deaths caused by the war.

77
00:08:36,720 --> 00:08:39,960
While it was still ongoing and in that post-war period,

78
00:08:39,960 --> 00:08:47,760
the major premise of the book is that the extent and nature of the death toll changed the way that death was represented in literature.

79
00:08:47,760 --> 00:08:55,370
What Castro mentor referred to as a change of heart in regard to Virginia Woolf's 1919 novel Night and Day.

80
00:08:55,370 --> 00:09:00,360
A second premise is that the unprecedented war losses and the subsequent coaches

81
00:09:00,360 --> 00:09:05,610
of both private memorialisation and public commemoration are a crucial,

82
00:09:05,610 --> 00:09:12,450
yet overlooked context for literary development in this period, including but not limited to modernism.

83
00:09:12,450 --> 00:09:19,350
So this book argues then the intertwining of modernist war and memorial coacher suggesting that much of what we call

84
00:09:19,350 --> 00:09:29,850
modernist experimentation in terms of death can be traced to its specific socio historical wartime and post-war context.

85
00:09:29,850 --> 00:09:34,770
The writers I examined here wrote death within a range of genres, some predominantly realist,

86
00:09:34,770 --> 00:09:40,380
some decidedly more modernist, and others working on a scale somewhere in between.

87
00:09:40,380 --> 00:09:48,180
Rather than radically redefining these terms, my argument extends and refines the concepts as understood in recent scholarship.

88
00:09:48,180 --> 00:09:53,580
The text I examine include works by writers of different ages, classes and nationalities,

89
00:09:53,580 --> 00:09:58,770
accounts and memoirs by Persian American Knesset's, including in an Bagnold.

90
00:09:58,770 --> 00:10:06,240
Ellen and Lamont and Mary Bordon works by Edith Wharton and American Rice, living in France from 1911.

91
00:10:06,240 --> 00:10:13,210
Here she is in the war zones. The New Zealander Katherine Mansfield and the American H.D. Hilda Doolittle,

92
00:10:13,210 --> 00:10:18,660
who both spent most of their adult lives in Europe, and the British author Virginia Woolf.

93
00:10:18,660 --> 00:10:27,660
On the way, I also touch on text by Rudyard Kipling, Rose Macaulay, Ian Force10, Jean Reese, Christopher Isherwood and Elizabeth Cohen.

94
00:10:27,660 --> 00:10:33,050
I focus my discussion on predominantly Anglo American women writers, the American writers.

95
00:10:33,050 --> 00:10:39,650
I discuss how I lived in Europe. Writers from elsewhere, such as Mansfield or Reese, may draw up their home.

96
00:10:39,650 --> 00:10:44,390
My geographical focus is therefore predominantly European and specifically British.

97
00:10:44,390 --> 00:10:53,890
But in bringing these races together. I've kept in mind that particular national literary traditions, histories and commemorative cultures.

98
00:10:53,890 --> 00:11:01,580
Modernist coach in the heart of the modern period, roughly 1910 to 1930, was inherently a war culture,

99
00:11:01,580 --> 00:11:06,830
and the study of First World War literature is necessarily historicist and interdisciplinary.

100
00:11:06,830 --> 00:11:15,260
My primary sources are literary texts, novels, memoir, short stories, letters, diaries, manuscript draughts and newspapers and magazine articles.

101
00:11:15,260 --> 00:11:17,990
I read these fictional and nonfictional texts as well.

102
00:11:17,990 --> 00:11:28,040
Writing produced in the context of total war, which constitutes a shared subject matter or subtext, whether explicitly or implicitly.

103
00:11:28,040 --> 00:11:32,840
I simultaneously draw on the visual and material cultures of memorialisation

104
00:11:32,840 --> 00:11:39,680
from photographs and paintings to break the news letters and memorial volumes.

105
00:11:39,680 --> 00:11:44,460
This was as HD wrote to the poet Marianne Moore in 1917.

106
00:11:44,460 --> 00:11:50,660
My culture surcharged with death. And now it just jumped to the very end of the text.

107
00:11:50,660 --> 00:11:55,850
Many of these women writers live long lives after that after the war ended in 1918.

108
00:11:55,850 --> 00:12:03,110
Many of the nurses I examined in the first chapter married in the post-war period and had families Warton stayed in France after the war,

109
00:12:03,110 --> 00:12:09,980
producing one more explicit Warrnambool sun at the front in 1923 about parental and

110
00:12:09,980 --> 00:12:15,080
civilian grief and dying in nineteen thirty seven in her home in the countryside.

111
00:12:15,080 --> 00:12:20,150
Mansfield died young in 1923 as her talent was at its height.

112
00:12:20,150 --> 00:12:27,650
HD lived until nineteen sixty one, writing and rewriting the story of a war losses in multiple forms.

113
00:12:27,650 --> 00:12:35,660
Wolf continued to write about the war in the late 1920s and 30s before she took her own life in 1941.

114
00:12:35,660 --> 00:12:43,280
We wonder how much that wartime experiences and losses continue to preoccupy these writers in those later decades.

115
00:12:43,280 --> 00:12:49,040
The numerous men and the nurses remembers Mansfield's brother, Wharton's nephew, HD brother,

116
00:12:49,040 --> 00:12:58,730
and her baby Woofs brother in law and the ghost of fellow writers and artists, Rupert Brooke on Regality Brusca Frederick Goodyear.

117
00:12:58,730 --> 00:13:03,230
When the peace negotiations were concluded and when life seemed to move on.

118
00:13:03,230 --> 00:13:09,290
When the 1920s moved into the 1930s, thirties and another war became more and more likely,

119
00:13:09,290 --> 00:13:15,020
all these personal and broader losses must have stood out all the more.

120
00:13:15,020 --> 00:13:27,960
So stop that and hand over to the panel. Thank you so much, Alice.

121
00:13:27,960 --> 00:13:36,420
And what we're going to do and I'm going to comment briefly and then hand over to Professor Whitworth and then to Professor Jay Winter.

122
00:13:36,420 --> 00:13:44,850
And congratulations on this, Will. I've been fortunate enough to hear some of the research in progress over the years.

123
00:13:44,850 --> 00:13:54,040
I remember you standing in a field next to a trench giving a fantastic presentation as we prayed that it wasn't going to rain.

124
00:13:54,040 --> 00:13:59,730
And I think many people in the audience will have seen your Times Literary Supplement article on that wonderful,

125
00:13:59,730 --> 00:14:07,940
wonderful work you've done on Wootten story, Field of Honour, which had gone overlooked by generations of scholars.

126
00:14:07,940 --> 00:14:14,130
And I think the impressive range of genres that you consider with this text and also the painstaking

127
00:14:14,130 --> 00:14:19,990
archival research research in the Imperial War Museum that there is nothing narratives,

128
00:14:19,990 --> 00:14:23,690
the Yale Centre for British Art, the visual and material culture.

129
00:14:23,690 --> 00:14:31,900
We got some indication of that with his beautiful slides and the Byner key in the Wharton archives and others.

130
00:14:31,900 --> 00:14:35,460
And I really wanted to bring in the structure of the book as well. I love the way you do that.

131
00:14:35,460 --> 00:14:38,730
The first half of the book, Death in Proximity,

132
00:14:38,730 --> 00:14:48,160
really examining those representations of death and writing by those who witnessed death close up firsthand, including the writing of masses.

133
00:14:48,160 --> 00:14:55,470
And you also place Edith Wharton in that section. So you're beginning with text written when the war is still ongoing,

134
00:14:55,470 --> 00:15:04,910
suggest that the proximity in which the war experiences the war dead influenced her mode of representation.

135
00:15:04,910 --> 00:15:08,130
Then that second part of your book, Grief at a Distance,

136
00:15:08,130 --> 00:15:16,280
exploring the responses of those largely removed from the war zones who didn't witness the death firsthand.

137
00:15:16,280 --> 00:15:23,640
And these writers, as you suggest, are more likely to turn to abstract imaginative modes.

138
00:15:23,640 --> 00:15:29,640
And one of the great take homes of the book for me was the way in which you suggest that literature

139
00:15:29,640 --> 00:15:34,950
written under conditions of war and without the knowledge of when this war was going to ends,

140
00:15:34,950 --> 00:15:45,120
provides some of the most generically and linguistically experimental examples of First World War writing.

141
00:15:45,120 --> 00:15:49,110
And as a Rhodes Scholar is perhaps no surprise, it's the chapter.

142
00:15:49,110 --> 00:15:55,620
I, particularly with a particular highlight for me was your intervention on Warton as a war writer.

143
00:15:55,620 --> 00:16:05,250
And it's a very important intervention, reading Warton as a war writer and reading her alongside writers that we don't normally place her with,

144
00:16:05,250 --> 00:16:13,410
arguing very persuasively that we should not be undervaluing that aspect of her body of work.

145
00:16:13,410 --> 00:16:19,250
You point out that we've often focussed on Gorton's relief work and it's an extraordinary what she does there.

146
00:16:19,250 --> 00:16:25,590
And founding hostel's and sanitariums, industrial scale funding, fundraising,

147
00:16:25,590 --> 00:16:31,860
helping refugees, organising workshops for women who are out of work by the war,

148
00:16:31,860 --> 00:16:45,240
making those five trips to the frontline in 1915 and writing about the moon magazines and newspapers calling for American intervention in the war.

149
00:16:45,240 --> 00:16:53,620
It's an interesting case, I think that you highlight that Warton is a generation older than the many varieties that you look at in this text,

150
00:16:53,620 --> 00:17:02,380
it's still very much involved. And the way in which she sees her peers to see the war in black and white terms,

151
00:17:02,380 --> 00:17:09,270
the fight between good and evil civilisation and the descent into barbarity.

152
00:17:09,270 --> 00:17:12,300
And you remind us that through all of this, she continues to write,

153
00:17:12,300 --> 00:17:20,650
and this is very significant body of work produced during this period, work that is often dismissed as propaganda.

154
00:17:20,650 --> 00:17:30,180
And we could certainly hold and sustain that tremolo note that this book invites us to look again.

155
00:17:30,180 --> 00:17:34,480
That's her. How will work. And for those who haven't read the book yet.

156
00:17:34,480 --> 00:17:39,120
When Alice focuses on a series of articles that would be published in Scribner's

157
00:17:39,120 --> 00:17:43,860
magazine and the Saturday Evening Post and then collected as Fighting France,

158
00:17:43,860 --> 00:17:50,550
published in 1915. A story coming home again 1915.

159
00:17:50,550 --> 00:17:56,780
And those that unpublished, previously unknown story. In fact, the field of honour.

160
00:17:56,780 --> 00:18:05,680
And I think what else what you do in that chapter. We really see Norton responding with all of her skills as a writer.

161
00:18:05,680 --> 00:18:10,800
And you point to her seising this new subject matter that we.

162
00:18:10,800 --> 00:18:14,820
She gives us an early impression of what she's writing about this.

163
00:18:14,820 --> 00:18:22,180
Almost as soon as the war begins, a scripting articles in particular come very early.

164
00:18:22,180 --> 00:18:28,640
And here in Alice Kelly's study, we see a Warton who's moving between literary zones,

165
00:18:28,640 --> 00:18:34,550
who's playing with conventions, and it beautifully complicates lingering notions.

166
00:18:34,550 --> 00:18:41,220
And they really are lingering notions of war as a jingoistic propagandist.

167
00:18:41,220 --> 00:18:51,420
And this book demonstrates the literary ness, the complexity, the subtlety of her work during this period, which is generally overlooked example.

168
00:18:51,420 --> 00:19:00,950
And there's a fascinating reconsideration of the atrocity story, the revenge narrative analysis, reading of coming home.

169
00:19:00,950 --> 00:19:11,190
And Alice sees in this writing distinct moments of anxiety or apprehension, unease concerning the war dead.

170
00:19:11,190 --> 00:19:16,740
And all of those readings that we get from Alice in that chapter undermine the

171
00:19:16,740 --> 00:19:23,250
straightforwardly propagandist statements that were expressed directly elsewhere.

172
00:19:23,250 --> 00:19:31,170
You see writing that betrays those anxieties about the justification for war, death, about the treatment of the dead.

173
00:19:31,170 --> 00:19:36,930
And what we see is a really strong case when it comes to water as a rule writer.

174
00:19:36,930 --> 00:19:46,470
We need to look again and say, I think it's a really important one of many important interventions that we get in that book.

175
00:19:46,470 --> 00:19:52,500
So there's my brief comments. I said I'm now going to hand over to Professor Whitworth, if I may.

176
00:19:52,500 --> 00:19:57,010
Over to you. Sure. Thank you very much for inviting me.

177
00:19:57,010 --> 00:20:08,220
A good session. Thank you, Alex. Thank you so much for hosting some amazingly powerful work for sound bites,

178
00:20:08,220 --> 00:20:19,380
powerful material handled in a way that acknowledges the suffering of soldiers and those surrounding them and the nurses and so forth.

179
00:20:19,380 --> 00:20:27,280
But that does so in a way that also keeps discourse and linguistic playfulness inside the soul.

180
00:20:27,280 --> 00:20:32,040
So in a way that seems ethically right in relation to the people involved.

181
00:20:32,040 --> 00:20:39,640
And the threats of absolutely compelling running through it.

182
00:20:39,640 --> 00:20:47,670
And there's also I think Lewis already alluded to this really fascinating range of materials with manuscripts,

183
00:20:47,670 --> 00:20:58,060
letters and memoirs as well as more, if you like, conventionally formed fiction, both in realist and in more experimental modes.

184
00:20:58,060 --> 00:21:07,050
And that those are things I found really exciting, exciting mix of work being brought together in RHD,

185
00:21:07,050 --> 00:21:15,080
thinking about the way that film or popular song might be kind of spliced into the three works.

186
00:21:15,080 --> 00:21:22,380
So that I mean, that raised for me interesting questions about another subject,

187
00:21:22,380 --> 00:21:28,290
and that's where it gets in the Edinburgh and the whole companion of negation letters

188
00:21:28,290 --> 00:21:33,680
to really powerful work elsewhere that overlaps with the mental traps upwards.

189
00:21:33,680 --> 00:21:39,480
So I would also recommend that anybody watching this not write me.

190
00:21:39,480 --> 00:21:48,540
A third question is about literature and literary love, which Laura has generally touched on in relation to two Wilson whether.

191
00:21:48,540 --> 00:21:55,430
Yeah, whether conventional categories of the literary need to be expanded to take in things like memoir.

192
00:21:55,430 --> 00:22:01,080
And because you're often looking at work sort of only through the work of feminist recovery in particular,

193
00:22:01,080 --> 00:22:05,640
have been allowed into literary studies, don't necessarily perceived as canonical shown.

194
00:22:05,640 --> 00:22:11,840
We're thinking about some memory, I suppose, in particular, unless there is a critical discourse surrounding letters.

195
00:22:11,840 --> 00:22:18,990
But that's not really, I think, well established or canonical ways of dealing with them.

196
00:22:18,990 --> 00:22:22,620
And so, yeah, like my question is perhaps unfocused or my might.

197
00:22:22,620 --> 00:22:33,630
My observation is that how. How does Literarian sit in amongst these different genres and modes of writing, if you like.

198
00:22:33,630 --> 00:22:43,580
And. Do the kinds of work, such as memoirs and letters that aren't so often treated have a distinctive power?

199
00:22:43,580 --> 00:22:52,970
Or is not power an extension of the kind of writerly ability to frame in close and distant discourse?

200
00:22:52,970 --> 00:22:57,890
We can also see a more conventional work, such as, say, man, two short stories or so.

201
00:22:57,890 --> 00:23:05,480
So I think a whole set of interesting questions about the power of literature to interrogate official discourse.

202
00:23:05,480 --> 00:23:15,620
That's one of the persons running through your book, isn't it, that some sense of a propagandistic accounts of war being subtly and sometimes not so

203
00:23:15,620 --> 00:23:22,580
subtly questioned and probed and twisted and refracted by the the works we're looking at?

204
00:23:22,580 --> 00:23:29,930
And it's also, I guess, questions about modernism and modernism in relation to the war.

205
00:23:29,930 --> 00:23:37,510
You mentioned in your house and you talk about that being a war culture surrounding modernism.

206
00:23:37,510 --> 00:23:45,870
And I a long time ago, Shari Benchtop, much 94 piece the letter from Paris in I guess the context,

207
00:23:45,870 --> 00:23:52,190
a very male modernist Canada at that stage in the history of modernist studies.

208
00:23:52,190 --> 00:24:01,160
It comes out quite strongly against sintering, the war and sort of tests that we're seeing so much of modernism, more critics of.

209
00:24:01,160 --> 00:24:09,140
At times you can't show modernism as as a post war phenomenon and that displaced women voices.

210
00:24:09,140 --> 00:24:18,950
And clearly there's been so many changes in the canon that those comments are, while important in that time, are not really stake any longer.

211
00:24:18,950 --> 00:24:28,790
But nevertheless, I suppose I was kind of interested in how modernism and war fit together to you more generally,

212
00:24:28,790 --> 00:24:31,940
whether because clearly modernism is going on before the war.

213
00:24:31,940 --> 00:24:40,320
So we can't that kind of argument that one sometimes finds in undergraduate essays or kind of very simple accounts.

214
00:24:40,320 --> 00:24:48,770
And just clearly that's not going to hold. I suppose a subtler question is, does the war change the course of modernism?

215
00:24:48,770 --> 00:24:52,100
Does the war change the course of female authored modernism?

216
00:24:52,100 --> 00:24:59,140
Does it change the opportunities for women writers in relation to modernist experimentation?

217
00:24:59,140 --> 00:25:07,490
And this comment doesn't equate Madison Boost was the end about modernism being strangely haunted by the dead?

218
00:25:07,490 --> 00:25:16,690
I suppose that raises question what it always was. It already haunted before 1914 or its a 1914 kind of.

219
00:25:16,690 --> 00:25:26,200
Development and then kind of questions about modernist fiction haunted differently from so middlebrow or non-Muslim restriction,

220
00:25:26,200 --> 00:25:29,620
is modernist fiction better equipped to deal with that?

221
00:25:29,620 --> 00:25:35,690
Haunting me because it can make use of devices. Any literature can make use of the advances,

222
00:25:35,690 --> 00:25:42,760
that it makes much more of illusion and makes much more of complex timeframes and timescales and so forth.

223
00:25:42,760 --> 00:25:54,780
Does that mean that it's. In a sense, it has the affordance, is that the kind of equipment to deal with what happened in 1914 onwards?

224
00:25:54,780 --> 00:26:03,570
So. And also interesting in the backdrop to this figure, in terms of the extended range of works you didn't think with here,

225
00:26:03,570 --> 00:26:12,550
I suppose, is a question of do you want to admit memoirs or machos letters as modernist works for experimentation?

226
00:26:12,550 --> 00:26:20,440
Or does it not matter that much with modernist or not? So, yeah, so it's a whole kind of stream of kind of questions that the book set off with.

227
00:26:20,440 --> 00:26:26,440
And I hope that gets some testimony to just how exciting and fascinating I.

228
00:26:26,440 --> 00:26:33,670
I find it. Thank you so much, Michael.

229
00:26:33,670 --> 00:26:38,970
I'll hand over to Jay and then we're coming back to you. Alice. Yes.

230
00:26:38,970 --> 00:26:50,750
Alice, thank you so much for asking me to join in this discussion of your important book and also for continuing.

231
00:26:50,750 --> 00:27:00,980
I think now a several generations long successful drive to break down the foolish barrier between literary studies and historical studies.

232
00:27:00,980 --> 00:27:06,130
Some of the greatest contributors to our understanding of the cultural history of the First World War,

233
00:27:06,130 --> 00:27:14,210
Paul Fossil's, Samuel Hynes, are professors of literature. And the idea that history and literature are, shall we say, in dialogue,

234
00:27:14,210 --> 00:27:17,930
constant dialogue is something that we owe to them and that you have carried on.

235
00:27:17,930 --> 00:27:22,340
And I think a very remarkable way. So I congratulate you on that.

236
00:27:22,340 --> 00:27:31,190
The second thing I want to congratulate you on, and it follows some of the remarks we've just heard from Michael,

237
00:27:31,190 --> 00:27:36,830
you have, I think, the strength of recognising that the war didn't end in 1918.

238
00:27:36,830 --> 00:27:45,040
That the distinction between war and post-war is something we we have constructed because it's simpler that way.

239
00:27:45,040 --> 00:27:48,300
But the lived experience of violence carried on.

240
00:27:48,300 --> 00:28:00,730
And I in particular, I want to congratulate you on the notion that the Great War was encapsulated in a greater war that extended at least till 1924.

241
00:28:00,730 --> 00:28:10,860
And we can't read the wasteland without understanding that the post 1918 period is drenched in violence and mass death.

242
00:28:10,860 --> 00:28:19,840
Now, one area I would like to draw you on, there is perhaps something we all are more sensitive to now than of year ago,

243
00:28:19,840 --> 00:28:26,220
and that is mass death included the influenza epidemic.

244
00:28:26,220 --> 00:28:34,940
And it is a backdrop to the distinction between pre 1914 and post 1914 masks,

245
00:28:34,940 --> 00:28:44,640
the haunting of mass death requires millions of corpses and a particular of the young and that epidemic in contrast to the current one.

246
00:28:44,640 --> 00:28:51,280
Targeted strong adult adults, males, maybe more than females.

247
00:28:51,280 --> 00:28:54,420
But in that case, ethically, the evidence isn't conclusive.

248
00:28:54,420 --> 00:29:04,140
But it was devastating for young males who were in army service during the war and after after it.

249
00:29:04,140 --> 00:29:10,650
So I was wondering whether your story of mass death might be developed or what

250
00:29:10,650 --> 00:29:18,710
have you thought about developing it in terms of the influenza epidemic? It's a question that I think is important in your overall theme.

251
00:29:18,710 --> 00:29:23,220
Now, the second area I'd like to draw you out on.

252
00:29:23,220 --> 00:29:25,740
I thought it was extremely important,

253
00:29:25,740 --> 00:29:34,770
the way in which you showed that not only commemorative cultures framed the development of literary representations,

254
00:29:34,770 --> 00:29:42,520
but literary representations framed the development of contemporary cultures, that there's a two way dialogue going on.

255
00:29:42,520 --> 00:29:48,120
It isn't necessarily in one way, but in that to a dialogue.

256
00:29:48,120 --> 00:29:57,270
I'd like to draw you out more on the Anglo American comparison or put it the other way around the British American comparison.

257
00:29:57,270 --> 00:30:04,780
The United States did not suffer mass death in the First World War aside from the influenza epidemic.

258
00:30:04,780 --> 00:30:10,090
The United States suffered a bloody nose in the First World War. Fifty thousand combat deaths.

259
00:30:10,090 --> 00:30:16,780
That's about the same as the French army and two weeks of 1914. Fifty thousand men died of the flu.

260
00:30:16,780 --> 00:30:25,990
To what extent are we actually justified in talking about Anglo American representations?

261
00:30:25,990 --> 00:30:37,090
And so we say modernist, the modernist movement, or what I would call American Anglophiles like T.S. Eliot would become,

262
00:30:37,090 --> 00:30:42,880
to all intents and purposes, entirely British rather than American.

263
00:30:42,880 --> 00:30:49,960
One of the things that struck me my whole life is how ignorant Americans have been of the First World War.

264
00:30:49,960 --> 00:30:53,830
And the reason for that is that it's not embedded in family history.

265
00:30:53,830 --> 00:30:59,060
And the reason it's not embedded in family history is that the numbers, thank God for the Americans were relatively small.

266
00:30:59,060 --> 00:31:02,050
The United States was in the war for only 18 months.

267
00:31:02,050 --> 00:31:13,120
So I wonder about whether the concept of the national character of modernism is something you might you might think about in a more specific way.

268
00:31:13,120 --> 00:31:17,290
And let me say that this is what Fassel, the two Fossil's book, the great book,

269
00:31:17,290 --> 00:31:25,570
The Great War in Modern Memory, is really about London and the home counties. It's not about England and it's certainly not about Scotland or Wales.

270
00:31:25,570 --> 00:31:34,030
To what extent can we say that the missing the silences in your book, which have always been there, are about Ireland, which after all,

271
00:31:34,030 --> 00:31:40,090
knew about death in an entirely different way and knew about it longer, and that post-war period leading up to nineteen twenty three.

272
00:31:40,090 --> 00:31:45,520
First the British. Shall we say troubles and then the civil war itself.

273
00:31:45,520 --> 00:31:57,520
So what I wonder about, I think is important is the national assumptions that one takes into an analysis of modernist writing.

274
00:31:57,520 --> 00:32:07,210
Is it possible to say that the American side of this is not related to American commemorative practises,

275
00:32:07,210 --> 00:32:10,610
but to British commemorative practises or French commander practises?

276
00:32:10,610 --> 00:32:17,230
But American ones to this day are threadbare compared to British and French ones.

277
00:32:17,230 --> 00:32:24,830
They can't even collect enough money now to put up a First World War Memorial on the Mall in Washington.

278
00:32:24,830 --> 00:32:26,350
They have been trying for three years.

279
00:32:26,350 --> 00:32:32,890
I know that because I been trying to help and it can't be one single American corporation could do this if they wanted to.

280
00:32:32,890 --> 00:32:37,210
But it's not part of the cultural history of the United States.

281
00:32:37,210 --> 00:32:46,090
It may be in the future, but for the moment, not so much. My question to you simply is, is this an English story that has to be, as it were,

282
00:32:46,090 --> 00:32:51,040
separated from an American one while admitting the importance of Americans to make,

283
00:32:51,040 --> 00:32:58,960
as I did England my home for, despite my accent for so many years and my children and so on as evidence of it.

284
00:32:58,960 --> 00:33:05,710
And the final final point I wanted to ask you about is.

285
00:33:05,710 --> 00:33:16,430
Is France now? We know that the French side of the story was absolutely dreadful bloodbath.

286
00:33:16,430 --> 00:33:20,870
Twice as many French soldiers died as those died in British forces.

287
00:33:20,870 --> 00:33:28,730
And that's much, much more than that, an American forces. To what extent did French commemorative culture have a bearing?

288
00:33:28,730 --> 00:33:35,480
Because what's really very interesting is how deep the village patterns of remembrance are in both Britain and France.

289
00:33:35,480 --> 00:33:38,510
Probably more than anywhere else in the world.

290
00:33:38,510 --> 00:33:45,830
Britain and France have a decentralised culture of commemoration where you go to the village square and you see the names,

291
00:33:45,830 --> 00:33:51,050
the multiple names of the individual families. Is this something that is transnational,

292
00:33:51,050 --> 00:33:58,070
that the writers that you looked at were certainly very sensitive to the question of mass death found in French culture,

293
00:33:58,070 --> 00:34:00,980
something which, Brexit aside,

294
00:34:00,980 --> 00:34:07,700
brought Britain and France together in an embrace that lasted throughout all of the 20th century and maybe even into this one.

295
00:34:07,700 --> 00:34:12,950
So all I want to do is to tell you how much I enjoyed your book.

296
00:34:12,950 --> 00:34:19,940
It is an important and I think exciting contribution to the literature.

297
00:34:19,940 --> 00:34:26,690
And I look forward to many years of drawing you out further and seeing the development of your scholarship in the future.

298
00:34:26,690 --> 00:34:31,690
Thank you, Alice. Thank you so much, Jay.

299
00:34:31,690 --> 00:34:39,620
Well, I'm going to hand over to you, Alice, that if you'd like to respond to some of those comments, Liz.

300
00:34:39,620 --> 00:34:47,980
Yes. Thank you so much for those comments. I'm so grateful for all those really detailed readings of the book that was so wide ranging.

301
00:34:47,980 --> 00:34:53,710
I'm going to try and just respond individually very briefly to each of you.

302
00:34:53,710 --> 00:34:57,820
Laura, I'm glad you like the structure, the book. It took me quite a long time to come up with that.

303
00:34:57,820 --> 00:35:01,810
I think that is a difference in terms of whether you wrote about death,

304
00:35:01,810 --> 00:35:07,960
whether these writers writes about death from a position of proximity in the war zones or from far away.

305
00:35:07,960 --> 00:35:13,360
I align that with a kind of realist mode of writing about death using traditional modes.

306
00:35:13,360 --> 00:35:21,400
If you close to the wars and using the modes of the Victorians really need audience graveyards and cemeteries, the death bed,

307
00:35:21,400 --> 00:35:27,220
the Victorian deathbed scene and those who are further away from the war using necessarily imaginative modes,

308
00:35:27,220 --> 00:35:32,770
turning to more abstract, more modernist modes, someone like H.T., as Michael mentioned,

309
00:35:32,770 --> 00:35:38,110
turning to the cinema or using her own body to depict her stillbirth as a war.

310
00:35:38,110 --> 00:35:43,540
So turning to much more abstract modes, I also yeah,

311
00:35:43,540 --> 00:35:48,790
one at one point that came out when I was writing, this was how experimental the wartime writing is.

312
00:35:48,790 --> 00:35:50,150
I'm glad you picked up on that.

313
00:35:50,150 --> 00:35:57,760
I've I'm writing about a war while a war is still ongoing is a very, very different move from writing about it much later.

314
00:35:57,760 --> 00:36:05,920
Previously we've thought about the Wolberg experience of sort of 1928 on as Mirabilis as being the source of moment of memoir.

315
00:36:05,920 --> 00:36:09,360
But actually, I was very interested in the war.

316
00:36:09,360 --> 00:36:15,010
Reisler it comes out while the war is still ongoing and actually just thinking about our current cultural moment.

317
00:36:15,010 --> 00:36:20,140
I'm watching attempts to memorialise Crovitz and the Corona virus while this

318
00:36:20,140 --> 00:36:25,240
very well we in the moment are trying to commemorate before something is ended.

319
00:36:25,240 --> 00:36:32,140
It's obviously a very different context, but it's been very interesting to watch that same memorialising urge.

320
00:36:32,140 --> 00:36:38,890
Without knowing exactly what we're memorialising about Warton, I think you've said everything we wanted to say, really.

321
00:36:38,890 --> 00:36:42,220
I mean, Warsan to me is a fascinating Raices.

322
00:36:42,220 --> 00:36:49,970
She was so versatile, so skilled at writing and frankly frustrated me to read criticism of her,

323
00:36:49,970 --> 00:36:54,190
a wonderful field of Warton scholarship that dismissed that important joke,

324
00:36:54,190 --> 00:37:02,200
that important moment in her, where she's really bringing all of her skills as a novelist to the cause of propaganda.

325
00:37:02,200 --> 00:37:07,180
But as that chapter argues, there are also moments where we see Warton being uncertain.

326
00:37:07,180 --> 00:37:15,760
She's a pro. She was a pro-war writer. But there were moments where she sort of trace herself and betrays her nerve as

327
00:37:15,760 --> 00:37:21,400
well as rights that that uncertainty into a fiction and sometimes deliberate mode.

328
00:37:21,400 --> 00:37:25,900
So I think that writing is really important, not one which I'm writing for Warton.

329
00:37:25,900 --> 00:37:31,900
And it's important to recognise that she was writing about war from 1914 to 1919,

330
00:37:31,900 --> 00:37:36,880
and then she suddenly turns and writes the books that she's most famous for, The Age of Innocence.

331
00:37:36,880 --> 00:37:42,650
And that in itself is a really fascinating moment of deliberate amnesia.

332
00:37:42,650 --> 00:37:47,380
You know, she calls it a momentary escape when she turns back to 1878 Paris.

333
00:37:47,380 --> 00:37:53,050
That in itself, that famous novel of hers, is itself a mode of war, writing in a different guys.

334
00:37:53,050 --> 00:38:00,370
I think to Miko's really interesting art, and it's so fascinated that you brought up the question of something being ethically right.

335
00:38:00,370 --> 00:38:04,840
How do we read things in ethically right ways?

336
00:38:04,840 --> 00:38:09,070
I'm glad you think I handled the tone right. There were numerous moments,

337
00:38:09,070 --> 00:38:13,630
especially when I was writing about the nurses and looking through diaries in the

338
00:38:13,630 --> 00:38:19,540
upper room exam where a nurse was on a hospital ship writing clearly under pressure,

339
00:38:19,540 --> 00:38:26,410
writing, you know, both sides of this page and then up and down the page because of no space,

340
00:38:26,410 --> 00:38:32,870
clearly exhausted whether you can apply the tropes of literary analysis to that kind of text.

341
00:38:32,870 --> 00:38:36,500
And I really sort of went back and forth on that. And I think it is illuminating.

342
00:38:36,500 --> 00:38:41,830
It is useful to think a nurse might be turning back to a Victorian deathbed scene.

343
00:38:41,830 --> 00:38:50,410
She's read in a novel in order to make sense of the experience that she herself is in at that moment, trying to deal with the deaths of numerous men.

344
00:38:50,410 --> 00:38:59,050
So I think it it I'm glad to hear that you also had that kind of ethical quandary.

345
00:38:59,050 --> 00:39:04,600
I'm going to move on to, I think, the question of letters and literary ness.

346
00:39:04,600 --> 00:39:10,990
I love all letters. I have to say, they've turned out to be something I'm very fond of in Mansfield's writing.

347
00:39:10,990 --> 00:39:15,670
The entire chapter is about months with letters really to some things about the stories.

348
00:39:15,670 --> 00:39:22,730
But I thought I'd write about how war stories and I ended up writing entirely about her letters and there were a few reasons for that one.

349
00:39:22,730 --> 00:39:28,030
One of which is the kind of socio historical element of letters in wartime that this

350
00:39:28,030 --> 00:39:34,300
was a story war because of the The Butler Education Act of the eighteen seventies.

351
00:39:34,300 --> 00:39:38,670
Many, many more people were writing letters in the first ward or it was a.

352
00:39:38,670 --> 00:39:46,600
The first kind of literary war and letters played a hugely important role in morale.

353
00:39:46,600 --> 00:39:55,220
So, you know, there were twelve point five million letters going from Britain to the Western Front every week during the war and months.

354
00:39:55,220 --> 00:40:04,060
It is a really interesting inversion of that because she wasn't the person at home, the woman writing to her man at war marry her partner later.

355
00:40:04,060 --> 00:40:06,730
Husband was in London working for the war office.

356
00:40:06,730 --> 00:40:13,360
She was in the south of France trying to find a cure for tuberculosis that would kill her five years after the war.

357
00:40:13,360 --> 00:40:18,640
And what we see is her total reliance on letters as a means of survival.

358
00:40:18,640 --> 00:40:25,570
She sees them as a kind of marker of survival, that having a letter back from Maori means she is still living.

359
00:40:25,570 --> 00:40:31,680
So the letter is really interesting. She also, in terms of whether or not it's literary,

360
00:40:31,680 --> 00:40:36,370
I make the case in that chapter that those marginal writers by mootness are

361
00:40:36,370 --> 00:40:46,450
actually where we might see the most interesting modernist experimentation. So in her stories, we see some explicit stories about the war,

362
00:40:46,450 --> 00:40:50,740
but it's actually in her letters that we see political Mansfield writing her

363
00:40:50,740 --> 00:40:56,230
real actual responses to something like the Peace Day celebrations of 1919,

364
00:40:56,230 --> 00:41:01,390
which she was horrified by. Or reactions to the death of her brother in 1915.

365
00:41:01,390 --> 00:41:10,360
Or how rewriting the accounts of air rights in Paris to multiple recipients and changing the way she does this,

366
00:41:10,360 --> 00:41:17,560
according to who she's writing to say those letters give her a kind of space for modernist experimentation and playfulness.

367
00:41:17,560 --> 00:41:22,600
She embraced the war, at least initially, as a new subject matter,

368
00:41:22,600 --> 00:41:27,040
and she played around with the metaphors and the language in the diction it gave her.

369
00:41:27,040 --> 00:41:30,280
And so with those air rights, she might describe them as horrifying.

370
00:41:30,280 --> 00:41:38,710
And unless it's a one person in another letter when I love to Cattell Jansky, she says the nights are full of moons and stars and big Zeppelins.

371
00:41:38,710 --> 00:41:43,150
Isn't it romantic? You know, she moves into a completely different genre.

372
00:41:43,150 --> 00:41:46,780
We can see how linguistic playfulness as it as that goes on, it becomes dark.

373
00:41:46,780 --> 00:41:49,850
But in general, I would say absolutely.

374
00:41:49,850 --> 00:41:56,230
I think the letters we should be considering them military terms are really important spaces of experimentation.

375
00:41:56,230 --> 00:42:03,460
Does the war change the course of female authored modernism and how to modernism and will fit together?

376
00:42:03,460 --> 00:42:08,260
I read a lot of criticism of modernism and I'll try not to speak for too long.

377
00:42:08,260 --> 00:42:14,860
What modernist critics may say, yes, the war was important, but they don't really go into all the material,

378
00:42:14,860 --> 00:42:19,810
social, historical elements of how actually that war dominated the culture,

379
00:42:19,810 --> 00:42:23,500
saturated the culture at the time from paper rationing,

380
00:42:23,500 --> 00:42:29,050
affecting modernist magazines to the language that people were using to the frames of reference.

381
00:42:29,050 --> 00:42:32,980
They had to the fact that people weren't always having enough to eat, so they were hungry.

382
00:42:32,980 --> 00:42:39,790
I mean, all of those things affected the ways they wrote. So I think we should be looking more deeply.

383
00:42:39,790 --> 00:42:45,940
We should be trying to really historic size what the war meant for modernist literature.

384
00:42:45,940 --> 00:42:50,770
I'm not making the claim that modernism wasn't already in swing by the time that the war began.

385
00:42:50,770 --> 00:42:56,710
It was. It definitely was. And we see it modernist experimentation happening before the war.

386
00:42:56,710 --> 00:43:03,040
What is so interesting to me, I think, is that moment of post-war, that conflation of two different moments.

387
00:43:03,040 --> 00:43:09,550
We have the moment of post-war experimentation, nineteen nineteen to about nineteen twenty three,

388
00:43:09,550 --> 00:43:13,630
which coincides with this moment of mass public commemoration.

389
00:43:13,630 --> 00:43:22,540
We have erection of the temporary cenotaph in 1919, which becomes the permanent cenotaph, which is one hundred years old next month.

390
00:43:22,540 --> 00:43:28,150
So that goes up in 1920, the burial of the Unknown Warrior, the star of the poppy appeal.

391
00:43:28,150 --> 00:43:37,090
All of this context of mass public commemoration coincides with those modernist text, those canonical modernist texts we've heard about from Jay,

392
00:43:37,090 --> 00:43:42,790
like the Wastelands, as well as really important text like monuments, the garden party.

393
00:43:42,790 --> 00:43:46,360
These are all coming out at this moment of mass commemoration.

394
00:43:46,360 --> 00:43:51,100
The question of whether modernist fiction is better equipped to deal with the war than say middlebrow.

395
00:43:51,100 --> 00:44:01,220
Arguably, yes. And in the ways it enables abstraction, the way it brings up different perspectives, multiple ways.

396
00:44:01,220 --> 00:44:09,680
And I think that's a longer conversation. I think that's a really fascinating question. I'm going to move on to Jay's points very quickly.

397
00:44:09,680 --> 00:44:13,420
Jay, I'm really glad you think the history literature is working well.

398
00:44:13,420 --> 00:44:18,370
I get that from you. I get that from Samuel Hinds. I got that from Paul Fossil.

399
00:44:18,370 --> 00:44:21,910
I'm I think I'm very I'm very happy if that's working.

400
00:44:21,910 --> 00:44:25,340
And I like your idea of the greater war. The fact that the war continues.

401
00:44:25,340 --> 00:44:30,760
So even though they're all kind of superficial distinctions in my book between wartime and post-war,

402
00:44:30,760 --> 00:44:34,960
I do say a number of times, you know, the war continued for many of these women.

403
00:44:34,960 --> 00:44:39,640
And the final section of the book, the kind of afterword is called Modernism Ghosts.

404
00:44:39,640 --> 00:44:47,600
And it's about how women continued to be haunted by these guys and to dream of these people for many, many years to come.

405
00:44:47,600 --> 00:44:53,690
Not to me as the most moving section of the book cruelly and the question of the flu is a really interesting one,

406
00:44:53,690 --> 00:45:00,590
particularly in our current contemporary moment. You know how much the flu affects us and stop the whole world.

407
00:45:00,590 --> 00:45:05,900
Yes. I'm fascinated by why it doesn't hold a bigger part in the cultural history of death.

408
00:45:05,900 --> 00:45:10,010
Why it doesn't hold a bigger take on our cultural imagination.

409
00:45:10,010 --> 00:45:17,060
It's slightly anomalous this year that we may have heard of it because it's been in the newspapers as a analogue to our current condition.

410
00:45:17,060 --> 00:45:22,850
But up until then, not many people talked about the flu or remember the flu and some of the reasons for that.

411
00:45:22,850 --> 00:45:26,870
I talk about in the introduction, one of the most important things I think is timing.

412
00:45:26,870 --> 00:45:36,530
The fact that it came right at the end of the war came in three waves starting in 1918, going into 1920, killed an enormous number of people.

413
00:45:36,530 --> 00:45:43,430
But actually people conflated it with the death they have already heard of with the man at the front.

414
00:45:43,430 --> 00:45:50,930
And there were sort of exhausted, I think there were war fatigues. And for them, those deaths just became another version of war death.

415
00:45:50,930 --> 00:45:59,000
Also, the fact there isn't much of a cultural legacy of the flu until really 1939 with Catherine on Forces Pale Rider.

416
00:45:59,000 --> 00:46:07,850
It didn't invoke this mass outpouring of literature in the way that the war did, but it really deserves much more study than it's ever received.

417
00:46:07,850 --> 00:46:12,320
I think the question of British and American culture of commemoration, I think you're quite right.

418
00:46:12,320 --> 00:46:18,950
And I think one potential frustration for me at the book is that there are very different commemorative cultures.

419
00:46:18,950 --> 00:46:24,500
And it became apparent to me in writing it that I wasn't gonna be able to deal with the American homefront.

420
00:46:24,500 --> 00:46:31,040
And the fact that it's it's a key difference that the British couldn't bring back their war dead from 1916.

421
00:46:31,040 --> 00:46:36,560
The Americans could choose to return the war dead, to repatriate that war dead, which is a very,

422
00:46:36,560 --> 00:46:42,380
very different causes and provokes a different way of mourning, a different mode of memorialisation.

423
00:46:42,380 --> 00:46:51,560
I'm actually writing on the American culture of memorialisation right now because it's fascinating to me that in the American context,

424
00:46:51,560 --> 00:46:58,700
in American memory, the first war is completely eclipsed by the Civil War and the Second World War in Vietnam.

425
00:46:58,700 --> 00:47:02,480
But actually, if you were in American society, the war is everywhere.

426
00:47:02,480 --> 00:47:05,870
You know, you can find a war memorial in Oregon that's in the shape of Stonehenge.

427
00:47:05,870 --> 00:47:11,150
You can find road signs in L.A. that refer to first rubato, which you can find.

428
00:47:11,150 --> 00:47:15,740
You know, the person who wrote over there in the centre of Times Square.

429
00:47:15,740 --> 00:47:21,830
It's really fascinating that there are all these markers of the war, but it doesn't feed into the public imagination.

430
00:47:21,830 --> 00:47:28,250
So it's a really astute comment. And I think American festival culture is something that, again, deserves further study, really.

431
00:47:28,250 --> 00:47:37,440
And the Americans I talked about in the book are really Americans in Europe, as you mentioned, H.T. and Walson.

432
00:47:37,440 --> 00:47:41,220
The final question about France. I think I'm going to hand it to you that you your.

433
00:47:41,220 --> 00:47:47,160
You're the person who knows more about France, but they I'm struck by the comment about the villages.

434
00:47:47,160 --> 00:47:51,160
I mean, the localised coach of commemoration that developed was very similar.

435
00:47:51,160 --> 00:47:57,990
And I hope did result in some of those partnerships between British and French towns that we live on today.

436
00:47:57,990 --> 00:48:04,450
The legacy of that. Thank you, everyone, for those comments.

437
00:48:04,450 --> 00:48:09,460
Thank you so much. I'm going to invite the West back in here in the audience if you have any more questions.

438
00:48:09,460 --> 00:48:13,750
We've got some coming in the chat room. Please do. To Austin and Chad.

439
00:48:13,750 --> 00:48:17,890
We'll try to get through as many as possible through was done, T.J.

440
00:48:17,890 --> 00:48:22,460
Did you want to pick up that point about France that was just raised? Well, yes.

441
00:48:22,460 --> 00:48:30,340
All right. I will pick it up because it strikes me as a form of what I would call the democratisation of commemoration.

442
00:48:30,340 --> 00:48:39,920
Both states are not important. What is important is civil society is the local lives and the local communities of people in mourning.

443
00:48:39,920 --> 00:48:47,230
And that strikes me as extraordinarily different from highly militarised, centralised states at war.

444
00:48:47,230 --> 00:48:59,660
The power of civil society to frame the culture of commemoration is something that unified Britain and France then and unifies it to this day.

445
00:48:59,660 --> 00:49:07,160
Thank you so much. In fact, the question of the Frenchness or otherwise of commemoration is one of the questions

446
00:49:07,160 --> 00:49:14,000
that's been coming up in one of the issues coming up in the questions and on me,

447
00:49:14,000 --> 00:49:18,170
as well as the kind of Q&A track that you can see. I have another chat going on where people are just playing.

448
00:49:18,170 --> 00:49:22,460
This is a great book. Congratulations on the new book. And also a great conversation.

449
00:49:22,460 --> 00:49:26,990
Thank you for bringing modernism into into a whole new area.

450
00:49:26,990 --> 00:49:32,090
All three of you. All four of you, in fact. So just time for a few questions here.

451
00:49:32,090 --> 00:49:36,530
I think the first which sort of picks up on your last point, the J, if I may,

452
00:49:36,530 --> 00:49:42,920
which is the difference between a kind of private commemoration and official political discourse.

453
00:49:42,920 --> 00:49:48,770
So one of the questions that somebody asked is, is that something you address explicitly in the book?

454
00:49:48,770 --> 00:49:57,440
Is somebody who hasn't read it yet, but he's looking forward to doing so. And if so, is it something that is inflicted by gender in particular?

455
00:49:57,440 --> 00:50:04,320
Well, I think they're thinking about what they say. The thing about Jacob's room, for example, but one might choose a number of other examples.

456
00:50:04,320 --> 00:50:10,820
Alice, is that something you want to address, the kind of question between the different from the public in the private and the gendered dimension,

457
00:50:10,820 --> 00:50:15,500
not just public political and the private and the gender dimension of that question?

458
00:50:15,500 --> 00:50:21,770
Yeah, that's a really interesting question. That's something I talk about in Chapter five of the book about peaceful commemoration.

459
00:50:21,770 --> 00:50:26,330
So that moment of mass public commemoration is very interesting in that we

460
00:50:26,330 --> 00:50:31,310
have writers responding to what is happening on a political states led level.

461
00:50:31,310 --> 00:50:37,910
So that's what I would argue, is that the memorialisation impulse is happening from 1914.

462
00:50:37,910 --> 00:50:41,870
So we see this drought, this drive to commemorate from very, very early.

463
00:50:41,870 --> 00:50:48,260
And that begins with the nurses in the first chapter trying to record and writing their individual men.

464
00:50:48,260 --> 00:50:56,630
They've been witnessing, dying and trying to give them some kind of justice, giving them some kind of memory and writing.

465
00:50:56,630 --> 00:51:05,930
And the way I talk about it is that they use the Victorian deathbed scene to try and give a kind of meaning to these mass deaths that are occurring.

466
00:51:05,930 --> 00:51:10,640
And that, for me, is a key example of people trying to remember on an individual level.

467
00:51:10,640 --> 00:51:16,610
The nurses also talk about things like trying to plant memorials for the men,

468
00:51:16,610 --> 00:51:22,130
temporary memorials before anything official has been established and what happens in the British case.

469
00:51:22,130 --> 00:51:30,230
The British government, as they realised they will have this enormous problem on their hands of how to bury the dead and how to commemorate the dead.

470
00:51:30,230 --> 00:51:36,050
And it takes them a number of years to catch up with that. They're trying to do it as soon as the war begins.

471
00:51:36,050 --> 00:51:40,460
But it takes them a number of years. And by 1919, they've been coming up with the ideas.

472
00:51:40,460 --> 00:51:43,070
Now the war has finished. Of how they will do that.

473
00:51:43,070 --> 00:51:50,870
And some of the ideas include the two minute silence and the cenotaphs, which becomes the temporary cenotaph in 19th.

474
00:51:50,870 --> 00:51:57,380
Nineteen is so popular it becomes permanent and it's established on Armistice Day 1920.

475
00:51:57,380 --> 00:52:03,290
The literature is really fascinating in this regard because it gives us an insight into individuals responses.

476
00:52:03,290 --> 00:52:08,060
So the reading at the beginning of Chapter five is sorry,

477
00:52:08,060 --> 00:52:15,500
Virginia Woolf's response to the opening of the permanent senator and how horrified she is by it,

478
00:52:15,500 --> 00:52:19,520
and the kind of nationalistic discourses that are being pulled in.

479
00:52:19,520 --> 00:52:30,170
And she's also reading every day about the burial of the Unknown Warrior and what the Unknown Warrior represents to the British people.

480
00:52:30,170 --> 00:52:37,160
And the way I read Jacob's room is that is an absolute response to the Beryle the Unknown Warrior.

481
00:52:37,160 --> 00:52:41,960
Jacob is the unknown warrior. And that gives the text a different valence.

482
00:52:41,960 --> 00:52:45,490
I think. Thank you. I don't know, father, brother,

483
00:52:45,490 --> 00:52:56,360
any of our because I want to comment on this this question of the private and the political or the gender dimension of it is one one two sentences.

484
00:52:56,360 --> 00:53:02,980
It's the absence of 50 percent of the men who died in the First World War of known graves.

485
00:53:02,980 --> 00:53:11,930
The artillery war is the basis of the haunting 50 percent of the men who died in British forces have no known graves.

486
00:53:11,930 --> 00:53:16,610
And this creates an enormous field of anxiety.

487
00:53:16,610 --> 00:53:23,670
In private commemoration, public language departs. And the point that I think Alice just made is absolutely right.

488
00:53:23,670 --> 00:53:32,930
As there's a private world that is confronting an impossible question, because it's not just that the men are gone, their bodies are completely gone.

489
00:53:32,930 --> 00:53:36,970
War has turned from being a killing field to a vanishing act.

490
00:53:36,970 --> 00:53:41,330
And that's something families have no way of coping with.

491
00:53:41,330 --> 00:53:47,660
Certainly states have no way of doing it, but it makes the private dimension much more important than the state dimension.

492
00:53:47,660 --> 00:53:53,820
Could I just mention one very quick response to that, which is Rudyard Kipling is a really fascinating instance here.

493
00:53:53,820 --> 00:54:00,770
I mean, yes, he's a male writer, but he's so interesting in this regard because he's very publicly involved with commemoration.

494
00:54:00,770 --> 00:54:05,000
He comes up with the names, will live forever more. You know, he chooses that.

495
00:54:05,000 --> 00:54:10,710
He's very publicly involved in selling the new cemeteries to the to the British public.

496
00:54:10,710 --> 00:54:15,740
He writes something called The Graves of the Fallen. A pamphlet that's provided with the Times.

497
00:54:15,740 --> 00:54:25,820
But then and that's 1919. In 1925, he writes The Gardener, which is a story all about a mother's loss for his son who is missing.

498
00:54:25,820 --> 00:54:31,460
And so you have that kind of direct response of a public memoriser with a private response in writing.

499
00:54:31,460 --> 00:54:35,450
He's a very interesting case in a way that's already answering.

500
00:54:35,450 --> 00:54:37,650
I'm sorry if I'm not pronouncing your name right, sir.

501
00:54:37,650 --> 00:54:47,630
Bill Blazek has asked a question about whether this literature kind of writes about the impossibility of expressing the new nature of death.

502
00:54:47,630 --> 00:54:54,840
And I'm very struck with Jay's idea that part of what we're what they're having to come to terms with is not having a body to commemorate.

503
00:54:54,840 --> 00:55:04,400
And the literature, therefore, finds ways of of writing about ghosts, obviously, but also absent presences that linger.

504
00:55:04,400 --> 00:55:10,940
Michael, I don't know if you want to come in on this question. I may be misreading your face.

505
00:55:10,940 --> 00:55:16,660
Your your muted. No, at all.

506
00:55:16,660 --> 00:55:19,460
It's hard to possibly about water that's there.

507
00:55:19,460 --> 00:55:26,670
OK, so another if we shift slightly now there's another question, which are a series of questions which have to do with water.

508
00:55:26,670 --> 00:55:33,160
And clearly, there's a number of watching scholars interested here. And one of them, in the sense you've already answered,

509
00:55:33,160 --> 00:55:42,130
which is are might one read the other nonwar book some Morocco age organisms through the lens of the war experiences.

510
00:55:42,130 --> 00:55:50,770
And it seems to me you've all effectively said, yes, these are all in some respect, war books as well.

511
00:55:50,770 --> 00:55:57,970
The other a more sort of directed question, which is do you consider the novella The Mom?

512
00:55:57,970 --> 00:56:07,780
And if so, what do you say about it? And that's about a broader question coming out of that is I just want me to I mean,

513
00:56:07,780 --> 00:56:18,070
if one takes your general proposition that the war informs all of Wharton's writings and even those bits where it is not obviously present,

514
00:56:18,070 --> 00:56:21,550
I mean, is that true of all of these writers who lived through this period?

515
00:56:21,550 --> 00:56:27,700
Must one somehow read the war into their continuing lives?

516
00:56:27,700 --> 00:56:34,730
Or is there a point at which one can sort of step away from it and say, I've dealt with that now I'm now writing about something else?

517
00:56:34,730 --> 00:56:40,930
Yeah. Really good questions. The man is her 1918, Texas and Havana.

518
00:56:40,930 --> 00:56:44,470
I didn't write about it in the chapter I would have done if I had time.

519
00:56:44,470 --> 00:56:52,420
It's very interesting because some of the tactics that we see, particularly the tactics we see in war, reported.

520
00:56:52,420 --> 00:56:58,300
So in Fighting France, she's talking about the substitution of buildings for bodies.

521
00:56:58,300 --> 00:57:05,200
That's the argument I read predominantly in that tactic. She often depicts destroyed buildings in lieu of bodies.

522
00:57:05,200 --> 00:57:11,020
And that makes sense. With Warton as an architectural historian would need written about the decoration of houses,

523
00:57:11,020 --> 00:57:17,380
she is depicting corporeal destruction through the destruction of buildings. And what happens in the mom is she now?

524
00:57:17,380 --> 00:57:24,160
To me, those metaphors actually become less. They become more explicit. She makes that more explicit as she continues.

525
00:57:24,160 --> 00:57:30,070
I think it's also important to consider what that text is slightly more cliched in some ways.

526
00:57:30,070 --> 00:57:34,690
And I think she was intensely fatigued. You know, she was writing it at the end of the war.

527
00:57:34,690 --> 00:57:38,320
I do make the case that this writing is all of great literary value.

528
00:57:38,320 --> 00:57:44,260
I think the man is possibly of less interest than something like fighting France.

529
00:57:44,260 --> 00:57:49,320
But I'd love to talk further with other Wootten scholars about that because it's a text that deserves revisiting.

530
00:57:49,320 --> 00:57:54,250
And West is interesting question about should we really be reading the war into all of this writing?

531
00:57:54,250 --> 00:57:56,350
I mean, obviously we should have limits.

532
00:57:56,350 --> 00:58:04,930
But I think it's interesting to think that when some when a writer wrote a death scene in 1925, it was very difficult, I think,

533
00:58:04,930 --> 00:58:12,040
for them to remove themselves entirely from this context of absolute mass death happened five years,

534
00:58:12,040 --> 00:58:17,770
seven years previously, and the fact that many of their compatriots were no longer there.

535
00:58:17,770 --> 00:58:23,620
So I would say I've been thinking about this with Kovik. You know, will we ever see Mass the same way?

536
00:58:23,620 --> 00:58:28,430
I'm not sure these things live long, long legacies, even if we're not aware of them.

537
00:58:28,430 --> 00:58:37,750
Yeah. Yeah. My question about how long that will last is partly as a 16th century, 17th century scholar whereby,

538
00:58:37,750 --> 00:58:41,810
you know, one can read Racine as being about the civil war, the 16th century civil war.

539
00:58:41,810 --> 00:58:50,570
I mean, it's these things do laugh at least a generation. I would say when there's a kind of mass involvement of people in the war,

540
00:58:50,570 --> 00:58:55,160
but that's that's to bring in a whole other version of France into the story for a minute.

541
00:58:55,160 --> 00:58:59,540
This time, I think for two or three more questions, one of which is there's been talk of women's.

542
00:58:59,540 --> 00:59:05,480
There's been little talk of women poetry here. That's a lot to ask you to write about poetry as well.

543
00:59:05,480 --> 00:59:10,130
But I wondered if anybody on that on the panel thinks that.

544
00:59:10,130 --> 00:59:14,390
Yeah. Is is women's war poetry part of this story?

545
00:59:14,390 --> 00:59:21,500
Is or is it a less present feature than, you know, the stuff that that one might have been brought up in British schools at least of war?

546
00:59:21,500 --> 00:59:29,690
Poetry is a very kind of male story. I don't know if anybody wants to address that question, I guess.

547
00:59:29,690 --> 00:59:37,520
OK. Laura. Michael. Yes. I'll be brief, Michael. I think with Warton again, it certainly is a part of her story.

548
00:59:37,520 --> 00:59:43,840
And she's actually a prolific poet throughout her career. And that's something we don't talk about too often.

549
00:59:43,840 --> 00:59:48,870
What she finds, she turns to Pelchat moments of great emotional turbulence.

550
00:59:48,870 --> 00:59:55,400
So we do see quite a lot of poetry coming out again from Wharton, from from the war.

551
00:59:55,400 --> 01:00:00,680
Some of them pretty much propaganda pieces, as Alliss suggested.

552
01:00:00,680 --> 01:00:09,080
Others really complicating that picture and giving us pause for thought and making us think again.

553
01:00:09,080 --> 01:00:14,960
And partly as the war develops, those doubts, as anxieties become more persistent.

554
01:00:14,960 --> 01:00:18,280
Voice that to you, Michael? Michael. Yeah.

555
01:00:18,280 --> 01:00:25,820
Yeah. I mean, just a different way of posing the question, which is the Pru's takes over some of those memorialising functions.

556
01:00:25,820 --> 01:00:31,100
The poetry and the elegy had had to be famously will in Russians two to the lighthouse.

557
01:00:31,100 --> 01:00:39,310
I need a new title, which I like that analogy. Do you think it was sort of advertising substantial so that I have an allergy to Virginia Woolf?

558
01:00:39,310 --> 01:00:46,940
You know. Obviously, it's not interesting to ourselves because it was a question sort of that was bubbling up into the question.

559
01:00:46,940 --> 01:00:53,170
But Literarian. Is that how you view it?

560
01:00:53,170 --> 01:00:56,800
Yes, that the memoir moves into the price forum on his own.

561
01:00:56,800 --> 01:01:01,610
I think it does, actually. I think people choose to memorialise in longer forms.

562
01:01:01,610 --> 01:01:06,620
You know, initially it's sort of memorial volumes. So the kind of privately published things that are coming out.

563
01:01:06,620 --> 01:01:14,290
And Wolf and Leonard are printing memorial volumes for Wolfe's for Leonard's brother

564
01:01:14,290 --> 01:01:18,160
on that on that press in the same time that they're printing Mansfield's prelude.

565
01:01:18,160 --> 01:01:26,620
So this is kind of interesting interaction of memorialisation with modernist modernism, new texts and modernism at the same time.

566
01:01:26,620 --> 01:01:30,550
I didn't write about the poetry because I think it's a completely different John.

567
01:01:30,550 --> 01:01:37,840
Right and skill. And I think the poetry, although we still need to do more on women's poetry.

568
01:01:37,840 --> 01:01:42,730
I think that's for another scholar. But there are some very, very interesting examples.

569
01:01:42,730 --> 01:01:46,280
I'm thinking of something like Charlotte Muse, the Cenotaph is doing it.

570
01:01:46,280 --> 01:01:51,520
Sort of very similar gesture to what Wolfe is doing when she's writing about the Cenotaph in her letters.

571
01:01:51,520 --> 01:01:55,950
So there's room for comparison. I think.

572
01:01:55,950 --> 01:02:03,340
Perhaps one final question for now, at least, this conversation will clearly continue in lots of different ways.

573
01:02:03,340 --> 01:02:08,680
But that goes back to the question of location that with sort of hovered over this whole discussion,

574
01:02:08,680 --> 01:02:13,660
really, whether it's in terms of the national location that that Jay drew attention to.

575
01:02:13,660 --> 01:02:20,560
And as a French scholar, I think piano has work and all the rest of it around and places of memory as well as your own.

576
01:02:20,560 --> 01:02:26,260
But this sort of national account of what what the war was right down to the village.

577
01:02:26,260 --> 01:02:32,620
So somebody is asked a question about how important the village is in commemoration,

578
01:02:32,620 --> 01:02:38,830
both in terms of the villages in the US where they may be in war memorials,

579
01:02:38,830 --> 01:02:47,560
which sort of paradoxically stand in relation to your proposition that actually it's not very much part of US culture or,

580
01:02:47,560 --> 01:02:54,700
of course, war memorials in British villages. How important are villages in this writing?

581
01:02:54,700 --> 01:02:59,620
And does that mean that we have to rethink to some degree, the geography of modernism as a kind of urban myth?

582
01:02:59,620 --> 01:03:06,790
Maybe you're all doing that anyway. But I grew up with the idea that modernism with this kind of urban form of writing.

583
01:03:06,790 --> 01:03:13,150
In fact, our village is vital to the modernist project. Yeah, that's a fascinating question.

584
01:03:13,150 --> 01:03:20,050
And also just the idea of the local versus the national, I think it's really fascinating.

585
01:03:20,050 --> 01:03:23,500
Why was I going to start with that? So many thoughts that brings up.

586
01:03:23,500 --> 01:03:28,850
I mean, obviously, we have writers like Virginia Woolf still talking about those national moments of commemoration.

587
01:03:28,850 --> 01:03:34,690
So seems set at the Cenotaph or seems set at national points of commemoration or

588
01:03:34,690 --> 01:03:40,030
invoking national practises such as the aeroplane goes overhead in Mrs Dalloway,

589
01:03:40,030 --> 01:03:43,330
the two minute silence invoking those national modes.

590
01:03:43,330 --> 01:03:50,160
But what's really also key, as I think is coming up in the discussion, is local modes of memorialisation.

591
01:03:50,160 --> 01:03:55,600
So I'm thinking of something like a text by Christopher Isherwood that should be better known at the memorial,

592
01:03:55,600 --> 01:04:02,920
which is based around a local war memorial. That's like, you know, a key driving factor for the story.

593
01:04:02,920 --> 01:04:09,310
I know there are many other instances of that in this writing thinking on a much smaller scale.

594
01:04:09,310 --> 01:04:12,580
All right, Joe, you're nodding your head here.

595
01:04:12,580 --> 01:04:19,510
Well, the reason why I do this, I think, is actually central to Alice's interpretation that local war memorials,

596
01:04:19,510 --> 01:04:26,200
London doesn't have them a war memorial for London. Paris doesn't have one or just embedded one at Ploughshares.

597
01:04:26,200 --> 01:04:34,840
Two years ago. But local war memorials are the places where women get into the public visual narrative of the war, though.

598
01:04:34,840 --> 01:04:40,720
The mothers, the widows, the sisters, the friends, all those people there are.

599
01:04:40,720 --> 01:04:47,640
Britain is as written about this quite extensively. These local places are not available in London.

600
01:04:47,640 --> 01:04:55,840
Then they're not available in Paris. They are available to integrate women into the narrative of war in ways that don't require nurses there.

601
01:04:55,840 --> 01:05:02,670
Everyone's story because it's the story of everybody's families. That's why I think The Villages is so critical.

602
01:05:02,670 --> 01:05:10,630
And the village is a place where we can see families in mourning. Cities are not if they're not so easily visible because they're so big.

603
01:05:10,630 --> 01:05:17,470
But your your interpretation also, I think is is exactly right on the idea that the Cultural Convention bring

604
01:05:17,470 --> 01:05:22,210
women into the centrality of of the cultural history of the First World War.

605
01:05:22,210 --> 01:05:29,110
Once again, I congratulate you on making that point, which has been missed all too readily in the past.

606
01:05:29,110 --> 01:05:35,850
Thank you, Jane. You put it much better than I could. And the last the last site that's interesting, I think, is those silent cities.

607
01:05:35,850 --> 01:05:44,110
So the pilgrimages that happened to the cemeteries and it's very, very moving writing from the 20s, Kipling's is one example of that.

608
01:05:44,110 --> 01:05:53,170
Mansfield's the fly where a father, you know, depicts a pilgrimage to these new silent cities, the new cemeteries on the western front.

609
01:05:53,170 --> 01:05:57,310
And that was a kind of localised sign of mourning when taking place.

610
01:05:57,310 --> 01:06:01,870
Sites of memories. Mm hmm. We're gonna have to wind up soon.

611
01:06:01,870 --> 01:06:10,030
But I I'm conscious that Laura and Michael, you've been very kind and stepping back and allowing others, including me, to ask questions.

612
01:06:10,030 --> 01:06:15,260
Do you have anything you wanted to add to the discussion by way of conclusion?

613
01:06:15,260 --> 01:06:18,450
If not, it's fine, but for the moment, Michael, your muted again.

614
01:06:18,450 --> 01:06:25,420
Yeah, I mean, so many things I'd like to follow up, but I think we'll take those sort of a time or whatever.

615
01:06:25,420 --> 01:06:28,940
Thank you. Laura. Huge. Congratulations on this.

616
01:06:28,940 --> 01:06:36,660
I think it's a wonderful book and a much needed book. I'm really looking forward to seeing what's next.

617
01:06:36,660 --> 01:06:43,620
Thank you, everyone. Well, I think I can echo the huge congratulations that are coming in.

618
01:06:43,620 --> 01:06:49,470
You can't see the chat stuff that's going on alongside me as well as they the stuff that's in the Q&A.

619
01:06:49,470 --> 01:06:57,990
It's clear that this book is going to produce a whole range of other exciting conversations like this one.

620
01:06:57,990 --> 01:07:02,220
But it's also clear, I think, that in the Michael J.

621
01:07:02,220 --> 01:07:10,400
And Laura, we've had some tremendous interlocutors here to make really exciting sense of what Alice has done.

622
01:07:10,400 --> 01:07:15,440
So this has been an exemplary book at lunchtime from torture's perspective.

623
01:07:15,440 --> 01:07:22,530
So we think of this as one of our own in some sense in torch because of the many different ways in which she's been connected.

624
01:07:22,530 --> 01:07:28,320
And I think it's just great that we've had this rich discussion here today.

625
01:07:28,320 --> 01:07:34,650
Many people are saying, huge congratulations to you all. So I would like to also thank you all,

626
01:07:34,650 --> 01:07:38,010
thank all of our brilliant speakers today for a tremendous discussion and a

627
01:07:38,010 --> 01:07:45,600
generous discussion that opens up all sorts of new areas and ways to explore.

628
01:07:45,600 --> 01:07:55,890
A whole bunch of questions. You know, commemoration genda, the local lots of really interesting things to think about here before we disappear.

629
01:07:55,890 --> 01:08:02,380
Then please join us everyone again, same time next week for our next book at lunchtime.

630
01:08:02,380 --> 01:08:11,220
When we do move back actually to 16th century France. Shipwreck in French Renaissance Writing the dire full spectacle by Jennifer Oliver.

631
01:08:11,220 --> 01:08:17,670
Dude cheque the torch website to register for next week events and four others later in the series.

632
01:08:17,670 --> 01:08:25,012
But for now, thanks once again to you all. And goodbye.