1
00:00:14,400 --> 00:00:22,830
So I'm going to present my ongoing Ph.D. research and I must apologise if some of you

2
00:00:22,830 --> 00:00:27,989
should have already attended one of my talks because there are very few upgrades,

3
00:00:27,990 --> 00:00:36,120
I'm afraid, at any rate, and the focus is on ensembles, commentary on the mind you should enormous and medium.

4
00:00:37,380 --> 00:00:44,910
So for those of you who may not be familiar, perhaps with the topic, with the Monday shooting a muslim or the author of the commentary,

5
00:00:45,360 --> 00:00:51,260
I will first give a brief introduction to the Scripture and to the author of ensemble.

6
00:00:51,750 --> 00:01:01,110
And then towards the end, maybe Odell, a little bit more deeper or more deep into some textual details.

7
00:01:05,920 --> 00:01:13,030
The Munchkin. Amazon gift is a circa seventh to eighth century Indian tantric Buddhist scripture.

8
00:01:13,330 --> 00:01:19,090
On the chanting of the names of lingerie Jana set about that is lingerie, the knowledge being.

9
00:01:20,050 --> 00:01:23,740
It is practically a list of epithets.

10
00:01:24,040 --> 00:01:25,960
In the nominative case in Sanskrit.

11
00:01:27,220 --> 00:01:38,260
These are called Names one, and they are of various kinds describing various characteristics of functioning and so on and so forth.

12
00:01:38,920 --> 00:01:45,100
The title manager shooting on a Sunny Day with which perhaps it is best known in the West,

13
00:01:45,100 --> 00:01:53,590
or maybe also the Tibetan tradition as jump singer is only attested in transcribed titles of Tibetan translations,

14
00:01:54,010 --> 00:02:00,489
but it does not appear to be attested in Sanskrit manuscripts or Sanskrit manuscripts,

15
00:02:00,490 --> 00:02:07,210
rather, show the simple title Namaz and epi, or such as in the name of Sun itself.

16
00:02:08,260 --> 00:02:13,209
Longer titles such as manager Shri Jana Sebastian Lamas.

17
00:02:13,210 --> 00:02:19,840
And so the chanting of the names of majesty, the knowledge being or even lower ones,

18
00:02:19,840 --> 00:02:23,290
as the one we find in the court of one such as Hug of Atonement, you should.

19
00:02:23,290 --> 00:02:35,410
Each of them are autonomous. And so the ultimate chanting of the names of the PAG about mandatory, the knowledge being or something like that.

20
00:02:36,670 --> 00:02:43,090
The Scripture claims to be extracted from the summary chapter of a 16,000 verse Miyagi la Tantra.

21
00:02:43,510 --> 00:02:47,080
But the Miyagi like extent in the conduit does not seem to contain it.

22
00:02:48,490 --> 00:02:59,770
The Scripture itself begins with another word in there, untranslatable to now or then suggesting that it may follow a larger part of the text.

23
00:03:00,850 --> 00:03:11,800
It consists of 162 verses or shloka, followed by a prose section describing the benefits of the chanting of the names.

24
00:03:12,940 --> 00:03:21,770
A short mantra, section and five concluding verses some manuscripts of the Namaste Sangeeta Show.

25
00:03:21,880 --> 00:03:32,470
Chapter Divisions 14 Chapter Divisions such as First Chapter on the request Chapters on the six families,

26
00:03:33,400 --> 00:03:37,180
a chapter each for the five noses and so on and so forth.

27
00:03:37,570 --> 00:03:44,180
And these divisions are probably derived from the later commentary of literature on the.

28
00:03:46,720 --> 00:03:56,000
The Sanskrit text has been edited and reprinted various times from minutes in to

29
00:03:56,050 --> 00:04:04,780
print ships of 1887 to perhaps the most widely known and used edition by Davidson,

30
00:04:04,780 --> 00:04:09,070
which is actually a collection of previous editions of the Sanskrit text,

31
00:04:11,080 --> 00:04:23,049
and more recently of verses 1 to 41 have also been re-edited, slightly edited by Anthony Tribe in his monograph.

32
00:04:23,050 --> 00:04:27,140
On the latter, Majerus commentary on the mind Just hitting on my son Eddie.

33
00:04:27,970 --> 00:04:39,160
Even more recently. Also Matteo Salvini published I don't know How to Say maybe an online PDF with a reprint of the

34
00:04:39,160 --> 00:04:47,950
Sanskrit text and discussion of variants taken from various commentaries and and the like.

35
00:04:49,330 --> 00:04:53,080
The Monkey Shilling Amazon has been translated into Tibetan,

36
00:04:54,160 --> 00:05:00,640
and there is an early translation listed in the early 19th century Imperial Catalogues and Carmine Dharma.

37
00:05:02,140 --> 00:05:05,500
There is a later translation by a French ensemble.

38
00:05:06,970 --> 00:05:12,100
So from the 10th 11th century and the 13th century revision by Sean Lord,

39
00:05:12,100 --> 00:05:17,530
at that time, the second war flourished around the second half of the 13th century,

40
00:05:17,860 --> 00:05:24,610
and this version is the one that was included by Wootton at the head of the Cross in the Congo.

41
00:05:25,540 --> 00:05:32,590
And there is even a 15th century revision by our children's uncle, or my pal of Pedro,

42
00:05:33,400 --> 00:05:41,860
who in many cases, according to Rufino, studied restored Renaissance samples and revised text.

43
00:05:44,320 --> 00:05:57,970
Or Rufino, by the way, transcribed the Korczak fragment of the now missing 80, providing the variants from the Dumont Manuscripts.

44
00:05:58,450 --> 00:06:10,540
Not all of them. All of them except the Tibetan, was not accessible to her at the time and providing the variants also of the new version.

45
00:06:10,540 --> 00:06:13,000
For instance, as I said,

46
00:06:13,270 --> 00:06:25,750
there are or do not manuscripts of the Tibetan translation of the numbers which provide do not provide the name of any translator,

47
00:06:26,170 --> 00:06:37,780
and none of which have a section divisions. So the section divisions I was talking about earlier, two of them are without the prose,

48
00:06:37,780 --> 00:06:46,540
one is incomplete and the other one is complete, and the translation largely corresponds to the ancient samples.

49
00:06:46,540 --> 00:07:01,720
Unrevised Translation. Another one is incomplete, but this time with the pros and it presents various different readings.

50
00:07:01,840 --> 00:07:06,640
So it might correspond to an even earlier translation perhaps.

51
00:07:07,630 --> 00:07:12,020
And the fourth one below is complete and with the prose.

52
00:07:12,040 --> 00:07:18,880
So it is, so to speak, the most complete doing one version of the last meeting.

53
00:07:19,180 --> 00:07:22,629
And this one too, largely corresponds to referential samples.

54
00:07:22,630 --> 00:07:34,980
Translation. It has also been transmitted in the immaculate womb, again with no translators provided and no section divisions.

55
00:07:35,430 --> 00:07:38,909
But with the prose again corresponding to oranges samples,

56
00:07:38,910 --> 00:07:48,030
translation and it is also found in the various editions of the NUMA come together with the California states

57
00:07:48,030 --> 00:07:54,030
that it was translated by Parmesan bevacqua paid sick and chocolate nuggets and revised by vital chance.

58
00:07:54,630 --> 00:08:02,130
So this is probably an editorial column on which is found very often in numerology about text.

59
00:08:03,780 --> 00:08:11,190
To provide authoritative lists to to the translation in this one to corresponds to tensions on translation.

60
00:08:16,350 --> 00:08:20,820
The text has also been translated various times in English.

61
00:08:21,960 --> 00:08:33,570
Again, the most widely used or famous translations are those by Davidsen in 1981 and then reprinted in 1995.

62
00:08:35,130 --> 00:08:40,260
Women's 1985 Translation and Presents 2009 Translation.

63
00:08:42,080 --> 00:08:51,470
Brazil's translation is not annotated. While Davidson's translation is very fully annotated and Whitman's,

64
00:08:53,150 --> 00:08:58,040
it's also annotated slightly less, and they are arranged in a slightly different manner.

65
00:08:58,940 --> 00:09:08,540
Whitman's monograph actually contains both the Sanskrit text and the Tibetan text together, accompanied by the English translation.

66
00:09:08,540 --> 00:09:15,290
While Davidson has the edition of the Sanskrit text and the annotated translation.

67
00:09:16,230 --> 00:09:25,550
Verses 1 to 41, again, as I mentioned, are both re-edited and retranslated in Tribe's 2016 book.

68
00:09:26,240 --> 00:09:32,690
And there is a very recent translation by Ryan Kannan with the assistance of Stefan Munch for the Iowa House,

69
00:09:35,390 --> 00:09:44,780
which makes use of various sources among which Davidson's edition and Vlasov addressed commentary and

70
00:09:44,780 --> 00:09:52,010
they compared the canonical translation of the numbers epi with the extra canonical translation.

71
00:09:52,310 --> 00:10:03,650
And it is also quite fully annotated. Last but not least, there is a forthcoming translation for the 84,000 project by,

72
00:10:03,920 --> 00:10:10,160
among others, I think DRS Julian Short and 60 to share Anthony Tribe as well.

73
00:10:12,830 --> 00:10:20,330
The popularity or influence of the numbers in GP, especially in Indo-tibetan Buddhism,

74
00:10:21,050 --> 00:10:32,570
cannot be overestimated as the sheer amount of works related to the tantra are found is found in the canon, in the Tibetan canon.

75
00:10:32,930 --> 00:10:37,250
So there are around 129 related works in the singular.

76
00:10:38,270 --> 00:10:46,790
And among the various Indian commentaries, which, by the way, have been written from various hermeneutical perspectives,

77
00:10:46,790 --> 00:10:52,190
from a yoga, tantra, perspective, coloured chakra, and so on and so forth.

78
00:10:53,150 --> 00:10:58,970
The ones which are still extant in Sanskrit are villous about Charas eighth century.

79
00:10:59,000 --> 00:11:05,120
None of them are looking be edited from chapters 1 to 5 by Anthony Tribe.

80
00:11:05,990 --> 00:11:11,270
Ravi agreed. Jana's later 11th to 12th Century American Kanishka,

81
00:11:12,230 --> 00:11:26,420
edited by A.S. Lal in 1994 and more recently the still unpublished vice defining Absorb in 2006, accompanied by Chandra's amrita daughter.

82
00:11:27,850 --> 00:11:39,490
And there is also a yet unedited but published codex soon equals one manuscript of this

83
00:11:39,650 --> 00:11:46,640
would armada a huge manuscript very large by one and very evocative or ugly at Chuck Gras,

84
00:11:46,750 --> 00:11:50,680
which might be a slip for a giraffe to be distinguished.

85
00:11:50,690 --> 00:11:57,819
However, according to Peter Daniel Santo and Francesco Spera, among others, by Mitri.

86
00:11:57,820 --> 00:12:04,560
And that also goes to be distinguished, sorry, from my train of thought, who also goes by the name of Archer.

87
00:12:05,170 --> 00:12:10,090
And it might be from around the 11th century.

88
00:12:14,740 --> 00:12:24,460
There are. There have also been various Tibetan commentaries on the draft from various authors of various schools.

89
00:12:25,690 --> 00:12:33,340
Again, the reason Cheeky Samples commentary is the focus of my research might be one of the earliest commentaries.

90
00:12:34,720 --> 00:12:39,640
Even though this is a slightly earliest Tibetan autochthonous commentaries.

91
00:12:40,660 --> 00:12:50,350
Even though this might be a little bit difficult to determine, especially because, for instance, the MM commentary, which is allegedly a translation,

92
00:12:51,250 --> 00:12:58,960
shows many signs of actually being thought of actually having been written in Tibetan directly and

93
00:12:59,260 --> 00:13:05,290
having been based on the Tibetan translation of the non-Muslim rather than the Sanskrit original.

94
00:13:08,780 --> 00:13:21,470
As for the life and works of Rose and Chicky sample, they have been mainly studied by Dr. Mogi Professor Doge one shook as well and Dominic Slaughter.

95
00:13:24,340 --> 00:13:25,690
His dates are uncertain.

96
00:13:26,270 --> 00:13:37,570
However, we can say with some certainty that he flourished between the 11th for the latter part of the 11th and the early part of the 12th century.

97
00:13:38,020 --> 00:13:48,910
So during the later propagation of Buddhism in Tibet, he was born in not all from a district in the western Tibetan region of lower tongue,

98
00:13:49,630 --> 00:13:53,240
and he is considered to be an imitation of Manchester City.

99
00:13:53,890 --> 00:13:58,060
Given his sharp intellect and ease in learning Sanskrit.

100
00:13:58,810 --> 00:14:07,680
And by some the reincarnation or disciple of slate, the genealogy of the and by others of Arcadia tailoring one or tailoring one.

101
00:14:08,950 --> 00:14:23,050
Now the identity of this lady Janaki and our charioteer laryngeal, which sometimes is or coalesces, is yet not not very certain.

102
00:14:23,560 --> 00:14:26,860
So they are two rather obscure figures.

103
00:14:28,000 --> 00:14:37,809
But Smriti Janaki, as will be seen later, was a very important figure in Rosenblatt's intellectual environment,

104
00:14:37,810 --> 00:14:49,570
meaning that Rosalba relied heavily on the texts associated with somebody that she had either translated by him or authored by him.

105
00:14:52,410 --> 00:14:57,060
She is. Also Rosalba is said to have met additionally Ponca City, Indiana,

106
00:14:57,480 --> 00:15:02,370
who recognised them as the reincarnation of creation Arcadia, one of the former haciendas cities.

107
00:15:03,150 --> 00:15:11,730
And in addition to being a translator of mainly Tundras, he was also the author of commentaries and treatises.

108
00:15:14,260 --> 00:15:24,160
Something that was not very usual or even well seen in the environment of 11th century Tibet.

109
00:15:26,140 --> 00:15:36,549
Among his most important works are his commentary on the future of Tantra, the earliest commentary on the Gujarat based tantra.

110
00:15:36,550 --> 00:15:45,040
The conjunction partly edited in non-Mortgage 2009, his commentary on the Amazon Getty, of course,

111
00:15:45,400 --> 00:15:55,780
also a very short passage actually edited in a Mogi 2009, but translated in its entirety by two chapter in 2012.

112
00:15:58,150 --> 00:16:02,050
His commentary on Atma Some of US manga that would take a while.

113
00:16:03,120 --> 00:16:06,689
Again, the authorship of this text is disputed,

114
00:16:06,690 --> 00:16:16,230
but it is usually ascribed to sum it up and his commentary on stated genealogy of this grammar mogul to ensure that this text as well.

115
00:16:16,830 --> 00:16:23,150
The authorship of the commentary is also sometimes ascribed to some reteaching and teaching.

116
00:16:23,160 --> 00:16:28,500
So. He also wrote a commentary on the set up about the summer yoga,

117
00:16:29,160 --> 00:16:41,219
and among his treatises are the tendency to get the picture completely edited in full by Campbell passing from

118
00:16:41,220 --> 00:16:49,860
the humour we saw among the research centre in Mysore and translated in its entirety by Dominic Slaughter.

119
00:16:51,000 --> 00:17:02,010
The Normal Handbook, also edited by Campbell Pashley, Dogen and other pilots of this project based in Mysore,

120
00:17:02,010 --> 00:17:06,990
so to speak, and translated into English by Heidi Campbell.

121
00:17:07,970 --> 00:17:15,290
And the Sunset Channel, edited and also translated, by the way, by a doctor or an animal in its entirety.

122
00:17:22,570 --> 00:17:27,280
So sorry. Perhaps a few words on the tension in his.

123
00:17:29,020 --> 00:17:39,790
Maybe most important work. So it is usually considered to be an apology of the doctrine or the great perfection.

124
00:17:40,300 --> 00:17:45,370
And much more than that. But you get into the details.

125
00:17:48,190 --> 00:17:53,890
As for results commentary on the numbers some. The 19th ship.

126
00:17:56,770 --> 00:18:06,550
And it well, a commentary with unspecified title is mentioned in the room by Maples.

127
00:18:07,030 --> 00:18:16,660
A list of works by Lonzo Ball was a direct disciple of Denzel Russell, also from the late 11th, early 12th century.

128
00:18:17,470 --> 00:18:21,040
And as you see, he simply lists a commentary on the number,

129
00:18:21,040 --> 00:18:33,490
saying without specifying the title in the Milbank's catalogue to his own plus collected works the commentary on the numbers and beauty.

130
00:18:34,520 --> 00:18:40,070
Again with no title specified is set to be a general commentary on the Scripture.

131
00:18:43,870 --> 00:18:50,170
The commentary. Is transmitted with the title of Nansen Ship.

132
00:18:50,590 --> 00:19:01,270
The supposed explanation or perhaps explanation of three points or three points in the various editions of Ransom's Collected writings.

133
00:19:01,540 --> 00:19:05,210
And also in the cut of me, my column on the various editions of the column.

134
00:19:06,730 --> 00:19:12,040
As I mentioned earlier, it has been already translated in its entirety by two of Sheldon,

135
00:19:12,790 --> 00:19:24,580
but his translation as the as to who himself specifies in the introduction is not annotated and not meant for an academic readership,

136
00:19:25,960 --> 00:19:30,840
though it is very elegant, in my opinion, at various points, and very useful indeed.

137
00:19:32,330 --> 00:19:37,310
And the commentary is also transmitted with a slightly different name.

138
00:19:38,090 --> 00:19:44,590
That is the lamp that clarifies the three ways or the three methods in all editions of the ten.

139
00:19:45,320 --> 00:19:53,540
However, this version found in the canon does not specify either author or translator.

140
00:19:55,100 --> 00:20:01,820
Translator since the being found in the Penguin should be a translation of a Sanskrit text.

141
00:20:04,800 --> 00:20:08,010
And Putin in his catalogue to the show.

142
00:20:08,010 --> 00:20:13,080
Thank you. As a matter of fact, doubts its authenticity, namely Indian origin.

143
00:20:15,330 --> 00:20:22,800
And this is not the first time that such a thing happens with the work, but also about, for instance,

144
00:20:23,550 --> 00:20:32,430
the commentary on genetic genealogy of this grandma, as I mentioned before, is also described as making himself and included in the year.

145
00:20:34,830 --> 00:20:41,610
And there are also a couple of other texts that Dr. Auden and McGee found out to be

146
00:20:41,610 --> 00:20:46,680
actually by add ons and and which have nonetheless been transmitted in the canon.

147
00:20:48,570 --> 00:20:56,940
In her own words. Mitten states that the fact that ensemble style of composition resembles that of Indian scholars

148
00:20:56,940 --> 00:21:03,280
in Tibetan translation may well have resulted in some of the works that lack an authorship call,

149
00:21:03,300 --> 00:21:09,840
often being mistaken for translated Indian works, and therefore in their being included in the ten new.

150
00:21:10,970 --> 00:21:14,780
So this is certainly a possibility.

151
00:21:15,770 --> 00:21:23,780
However, I would also argue that at least with regard to Rosenberg's commentary on the numbers and perhaps

152
00:21:23,780 --> 00:21:30,680
the main reason for it being included in the ten year is that it borrows very often verbatim,

153
00:21:31,190 --> 00:21:36,860
very lengthy passages of text from Indian sources.

154
00:21:41,840 --> 00:21:48,710
Now the text is structured as the title itself specifies in three main points.

155
00:21:49,550 --> 00:21:53,060
The first one being on the nature of mind usually.

156
00:21:53,480 --> 00:21:58,780
And in brief he is said to be known to this act by a junior.

157
00:21:59,890 --> 00:22:03,430
Immigration. The second point is on the names of.

158
00:22:04,120 --> 00:22:10,720
So what are these? And these should be that one should chant again.

159
00:22:10,930 --> 00:22:15,460
The second point is further subdivided into two points.

160
00:22:15,910 --> 00:22:24,940
The first one is the so-called general teaching, in which a magistrate is said to be the embodiment of all phenomena.

161
00:22:25,510 --> 00:22:31,810
He said, to pervade all phenomena in for manners, symptomatic, for knowledge, compassion, activities.

162
00:22:32,800 --> 00:22:36,940
He manifests as all phenomena. He delights in all phenomena.

163
00:22:36,940 --> 00:22:47,090
He knows all phenomena, and he speaks of phenomena. And so on and so forth.

164
00:22:48,290 --> 00:23:00,230
The specific teaching is further divided into a section regarding defiled phenomena and a section regarding undefiled phenomena in the first one.

165
00:23:01,260 --> 00:23:08,780
Monday she is said to be the defining characteristic of defiled phenomena, but he is not characterised by them.

166
00:23:09,470 --> 00:23:13,160
Similarly, she pervades them, but she is not supported by them.

167
00:23:13,670 --> 00:23:20,000
He suffuses and empowers or blesses them, but he is not seized nor tainted by them.

168
00:23:22,300 --> 00:23:30,100
On the ultimate level of a state's one chance by assuming that there is no duality between pure and impure phenomena.

169
00:23:30,550 --> 00:23:35,020
And since those impurities are to be abandoned merrily on the conventional level,

170
00:23:35,380 --> 00:23:43,780
one chance the names by assuming that on the one hand mandatory abandoned the impurities which characterise defiled phenomena,

171
00:23:44,140 --> 00:23:47,980
and on the other that the impurities are perpetually exhausted.

172
00:23:50,290 --> 00:23:55,090
You can see it's there's quite a bit of addition in spread brackets.

173
00:23:55,420 --> 00:24:01,590
It's bit towards passage. And then again Monday.

174
00:24:01,610 --> 00:24:07,700
She is said to give rise to difficult phenomena, but acting as their dominant condition.

175
00:24:07,700 --> 00:24:12,200
I think that the bacteria, but not as their causal condition Hindu criteria.

176
00:24:13,340 --> 00:24:20,870
Similarly she arises on account of them, but defines phenomena are not mind usurious causal condition there.

177
00:24:22,390 --> 00:24:31,270
As for undefiled phenomena, Monday usually is characterised by then he is supported by them, he is suffused by them, and so on and so forth.

178
00:24:33,280 --> 00:24:46,810
The third point concerning the actual ways of chanting the names of my city and it is the section that shows the most textual borrowing,

179
00:24:47,050 --> 00:24:53,710
as we will see in a minute, consists again of three points itself.

180
00:24:54,160 --> 00:25:00,970
The first one concerns the chanting by viewing the names as having the meaning of good qualities

181
00:25:01,360 --> 00:25:06,760
and then qualities in the parameter and in the mantra system are described at some length.

182
00:25:08,020 --> 00:25:21,819
The second point consists in chanting by viewing the names as having the meaning of mantras in which there is a very lengthy discussion.

183
00:25:21,820 --> 00:25:31,660
And actually here is where the textual borrowing from the Last of US commentary begins on the Awakening through the five forms of analysis.

184
00:25:33,920 --> 00:25:42,710
Or the five. Abby Some of it is so mare like noses, noses of equality, discriminating noses,

185
00:25:43,040 --> 00:25:49,730
the noses of the pure atmosphere and access to this then follows a mandala visualisation

186
00:25:50,750 --> 00:25:57,049
with habanero china at the centre and the Ardi Buddha at the centre of my

187
00:25:57,050 --> 00:26:03,020
have I wrote China a wisdom wheel in his heart and my speech on a satellite and

188
00:26:03,020 --> 00:26:08,720
the letter off and then followed by an emanation or reabsorption of libraries.

189
00:26:10,370 --> 00:26:18,650
The text continues with a description of the generation of the 37 duties of the budget atop the Maha Mandala.

190
00:26:19,580 --> 00:26:26,750
So the basic mandala the site about the target that that the sum up plus 16 bodhisattvas.

191
00:26:28,400 --> 00:26:37,160
Then it goes on with the emanation from the letter of the five circles outside the mandala with

192
00:26:37,160 --> 00:26:43,660
a reabsorption of the mandala and to the letter and other similar visualisations for those of,

193
00:26:44,300 --> 00:26:54,560
in the words of a lesser intellect, who are not able to perform such a complicated or complex visualisation as described before.

194
00:26:56,000 --> 00:27:05,810
The third and last point of this last section of the text consists in the chanting by viewing the names as having the meaning of non duality.

195
00:27:07,160 --> 00:27:14,870
And here it also goes into some detail in discussing the concept of the helpfulness and truthfulness.

196
00:27:14,870 --> 00:27:25,490
So Pemberton then parts of the Buddhist speeches and it concludes with three ways of generating non dual dharma to one spend time.

197
00:27:26,390 --> 00:27:29,760
Then there's a very short conclusion and the qualifier.

198
00:27:34,370 --> 00:27:40,550
The text, by the way, begins as other texts, but also abruptly.

199
00:27:40,760 --> 00:27:54,990
That is, it does not have. Kind of a statement of authorship and where now the exact word escapes me.

200
00:27:58,470 --> 00:28:04,940
Kind of it would be in Tibetan, I think. Spiritual worship.

201
00:28:05,420 --> 00:28:16,070
Yes. Thank you very much. And as you would expect at the beginning of the treatises, both in the Indian and the Tibetan tradition.

202
00:28:18,230 --> 00:28:25,430
Now, concerning the textual borrowing in the ancient ship, the main sources of this,

203
00:28:25,430 --> 00:28:35,280
as I have already mentioned, are Villa Saba, Jarrus, Nama, Luchini and other texts by some related generic.

204
00:28:36,050 --> 00:28:41,990
So as for the first one, there are three versions of the Tibetan translation.

205
00:28:45,250 --> 00:28:51,819
So perhaps from the talk from the last version, there is a final real revised,

206
00:28:51,820 --> 00:28:57,670
as I call it, canonical version transmitted into tangled, which goes by the name.

207
00:28:59,640 --> 00:29:06,719
Since Samsung Accidental Number Talwar translated by Smriti Janaki and revised by Vijay

208
00:29:06,720 --> 00:29:12,930
Rupani and look a [INAUDIBLE] up sick who also flourished around the 11th 12th century.

209
00:29:14,010 --> 00:29:24,570
So. Not. Not much later than somebody teaching an occupied self or even one.

210
00:29:25,430 --> 00:29:32,220
And the version contained in the picking. Thank you. States that it was further revised by one nin.

211
00:29:32,690 --> 00:29:38,600
She knew about the identity of this man is not yet entirely clear to me.

212
00:29:40,670 --> 00:29:53,720
There is an intermediate once revised we could say canonical version in the 10th update compiled in the 14th century around 1317 1323,

213
00:29:54,980 --> 00:29:57,140
which goes by the title of.

214
00:29:58,560 --> 00:30:06,820
Slightly different titled Stand up a ship and number Ship but sing a song according to zinc instead of sung accidental number one.

215
00:30:08,460 --> 00:30:16,440
This one, as I said, already translated by Smriti John and revised by Vegeta and look at [INAUDIBLE] up tape that is,

216
00:30:16,440 --> 00:30:20,070
I think, not further revised by this men.

217
00:30:21,180 --> 00:30:32,280
And there is an earlier yet earlier unrevised extra canonical version extant as far as I can tell in a single which in manuscript.

218
00:30:34,040 --> 00:30:38,990
Which goes by the title again numbers but singing nothing bar.

219
00:30:40,880 --> 00:30:46,850
So as you see more similar to the intermediate versions title.

220
00:30:48,960 --> 00:30:55,170
And this, I think is this military genealogy is unrevised.

221
00:30:55,680 --> 00:31:00,630
Translation The call phone, unfortunately, is very hardly legible.

222
00:31:02,640 --> 00:31:08,879
But I think we can make out at least the name of part of the name of Great Kitchen.

223
00:31:08,880 --> 00:31:15,990
And I get this, so I hope it is. Visible, but Hewitt's as guilty.

224
00:31:16,350 --> 00:31:19,460
Beautiful. And so on and so forth.

225
00:31:20,210 --> 00:31:23,210
So at least the name of the translator is secured.

226
00:31:23,690 --> 00:31:27,200
And I do not think that any revise or as mentioned.

227
00:31:29,010 --> 00:31:32,790
And the translation is very different from the other two versions.

228
00:31:32,800 --> 00:31:40,290
So this is also why I think it is assimilated. Nina's Unrevised translation as indicated by the.

229
00:31:43,790 --> 00:31:49,610
So do we could say at the top of the manuscript. So cheap, MA Six, six, seven.

230
00:31:50,960 --> 00:31:54,500
It was probably kept in the general National Park.

231
00:31:58,190 --> 00:32:07,430
And it it is one of those manuscripts which came from outside the Library of Japan, as indicated by Cheat.

232
00:32:09,590 --> 00:32:15,800
However, the double card check published in the early 2000, if I'm not mistaken,

233
00:32:17,420 --> 00:32:25,220
does not include this manuscript because it skips from tumour 665 to tumour 670.

234
00:32:30,800 --> 00:32:43,070
As I will show later. Also, Rosa clearly borrowed from this early unrevised translation of the notes, not from the canonical ones.

235
00:32:45,560 --> 00:32:52,760
The parts of the text that are borrowed are the ones concerned with the generation of the

236
00:32:52,760 --> 00:33:00,030
five forms of analysis and mandala visualisation borrowed from the name of my niece.

237
00:33:00,190 --> 00:33:07,010
Chapter four. Without however the commentary on not singing D 25 to 27.

238
00:33:10,230 --> 00:33:13,050
The same section is can also be seen.

239
00:33:13,380 --> 00:33:25,080
Also occurs however with the commentary in the chewed up matter, which is one of the Sanskrit common sorry commentaries on the name of Sangeeta,

240
00:33:25,200 --> 00:33:35,490
which are still extant in Sanskrit in the large yet unedited manuscript and a shorter section,

241
00:33:35,970 --> 00:33:42,210
also appears to have been borrowed in Ananda Garber's set about little cutie pie showdown at Peacock,

242
00:33:42,630 --> 00:33:47,490
translated by Kumar Asha and troubleshooter also from around the 11th century.

243
00:33:50,690 --> 00:33:54,710
Of course, this text only survives in Tibetan translation.

244
00:33:55,850 --> 00:34:05,930
And this text too, appears to borrow this part of text from the early unrevised translation of the non online content in.

245
00:34:09,950 --> 00:34:21,620
However, there are slight changes in the in the mandala visualisation because it is adapted from the name of intractable Guinea

246
00:34:22,520 --> 00:34:29,750
to this let's say Salvador at the parish hall in a context with some of the vital China at the centre of the Mandela.

247
00:34:33,680 --> 00:34:42,050
The borrowing continues with the generation of the 37 days of the budget at the heart of Muhammad, the last 16 bodhisattvas,

248
00:34:42,530 --> 00:34:46,040
which corresponds to Chapter five of the norm of Antarctica, New Guinea,

249
00:34:47,130 --> 00:34:58,340
and the very final parts of chapters 6 to 10 of the same texts are also borrowed.

250
00:34:59,390 --> 00:35:10,580
This time, less literally, No. In the ensembles description of the emanation from the letter of the five circles outside the budget of Dr. Muhammad.

251
00:35:16,780 --> 00:35:31,480
Now. As for. The other main source of rules on US borrowing or reuse is this metagenomics of these workshop up on global recovery.

252
00:35:32,320 --> 00:35:36,460
That is a commentary on underreport these wash up on ICA.

253
00:35:39,020 --> 00:35:44,870
Now again, the identity of Andrew Body as well is quite disputed.

254
00:35:45,830 --> 00:35:56,420
In the Tibetan tradition, he is usually considered to be the same as Vinessa by John Oliver, as shown by Anthony Tribe,

255
00:35:56,630 --> 00:36:10,460
the Californian of the Palm Leaf manuscript of the commentary that suggests that Andrew Body was actually the maternal uncle of Elizabeth.

256
00:36:11,690 --> 00:36:16,250
So I will consider him to be a different person for the time being.

257
00:36:18,740 --> 00:36:26,000
And this text by Andrew Body was also translated by Smriti, Janu and.

258
00:36:27,820 --> 00:36:33,340
Is also found in an extra canonical version in a human manuscript,

259
00:36:34,030 --> 00:36:44,200
which again bears the same code of the declination Kong as the manuscript containing

260
00:36:44,200 --> 00:36:49,320
the extra canonical Unrevised translation of Elizabeth Gerrard's number one.

261
00:36:52,600 --> 00:36:58,450
The section borrowed from the spirited genealogy of these pretty is the section

262
00:36:58,450 --> 00:37:04,599
commenting on the 12 syllables for art with long citations from in London.

263
00:37:04,600 --> 00:37:09,490
Sri Miyagi Luthra Tantra, which I have not traced yet.

264
00:37:13,160 --> 00:37:20,570
So these verses which I cited actually seem to be found only in the bottles Lopez nonsense ship.

265
00:37:20,720 --> 00:37:24,130
And in spite of these pretty.

266
00:37:26,630 --> 00:37:32,570
Roseanne Barr, by the way, can also be seen to perhaps borrow some ideas,

267
00:37:32,570 --> 00:37:40,840
if not text, literal text from some pretty genealogist own commentary on the people.

268
00:37:41,300 --> 00:37:50,500
Possible. Now to give a few examples of such textual borrowing.

269
00:37:52,900 --> 00:37:58,270
There is what I. For the time being tentatively called non-repeating borrowing.

270
00:38:01,480 --> 00:38:08,500
In which, for instance, in this section dedicated to the noses of equality.

271
00:38:12,010 --> 00:38:22,000
Villa Saavedra. So the part excuse me in In Grey is part of text, which are also kind of ignored,

272
00:38:22,030 --> 00:38:31,149
so to speak, to the part of text in Black is something he is likely rewrites or copies.

273
00:38:31,150 --> 00:38:44,230
And this part, too, has been substituted by Rosenbaum with two paths from the door which express a similar idea.

274
00:38:45,070 --> 00:38:51,070
So now to take a look at it in English translation, which might be faster and easier,

275
00:38:52,600 --> 00:39:00,820
where the lasso vajra states just as phenomena are empty without an essence, so too am I empty and without a self.

276
00:39:01,490 --> 00:39:12,870
Rosenbach Kind of. Quoting the number, The backdoor expresses a similar idea, saying that since all phenomena are naturally pure,

277
00:39:13,110 --> 00:39:20,400
I too am naturally pure, and the concept of purity is very important in the Numa tradition.

278
00:39:20,730 --> 00:39:30,150
This may be one of the reasons why it also, in this specific case, chose not to borrow text verbatim from the classified chirag,

279
00:39:30,150 --> 00:39:40,110
but substituted it, so to speak, with two others from from an authoritative scripture for the tradition.

280
00:39:44,160 --> 00:39:50,160
In addition to this non verbatim borrowing, there is also the AC verbatim borrowing.

281
00:39:51,480 --> 00:40:00,120
So without taking a look at this in its entirety, let's say that Rousseau simply skips some words here and there,

282
00:40:01,110 --> 00:40:06,960
but reproducing the text practically verbatim from de la Salvadorans commentary.

283
00:40:12,050 --> 00:40:14,120
Now to show you that rules of.

284
00:40:16,670 --> 00:40:26,870
Borrowed, clearly borrowed from the Unrevised extra canonical translation of philosopher Janus commentary and not from the canonical one.

285
00:40:28,040 --> 00:40:37,940
Let's take a look to some translation differences between these two versions and also Byzantine text.

286
00:40:41,720 --> 00:40:50,840
So this short Sanskrit phrase said about the target on Malabar somebody some up on them.

287
00:40:51,380 --> 00:41:04,490
So with all the target as head ornaments immersed in meditative concentration, here are clearly the parts in italics are the ones that interest us,

288
00:41:04,790 --> 00:41:09,680
and the blue ones are the canonical ones, and the green ones are the actual canonical.

289
00:41:10,250 --> 00:41:21,860
So Mahabharata has been translated as Rajini Ganga and sum up as large number, but in the canonical version,

290
00:41:22,280 --> 00:41:32,690
while the extra canonical version shows the translation gaining for my partner and simply tending Themba for some up on them.

291
00:41:33,140 --> 00:41:36,440
And this is exactly what we find in the text.

292
00:41:36,770 --> 00:41:46,300
So getting this thing in Zintan that. Similarly, in the compound state of Virginia, Chinese know they are khanum.

293
00:41:46,900 --> 00:41:58,000
So the cause of the arising of the noses of the ammunition, once the very last word corona is translated GQ in the canonical version,

294
00:41:58,450 --> 00:42:03,790
or rather I should say maybe revised, it has been revised in the canonical version.

295
00:42:04,540 --> 00:42:11,380
While the initial unrevised translation has kin, as does the bronze on text.

296
00:42:13,910 --> 00:42:20,350
Perhaps one last example. Which also shows, by the way, the.

297
00:42:21,380 --> 00:42:31,340
The superiority, we could say, of the in many places, not in all places, but in many places of the early unrevised translation,

298
00:42:31,340 --> 00:42:40,250
meaning that it reflects more faithfully the underlined Sanskrit than the revised canonical one.

299
00:42:42,080 --> 00:42:48,640
This happens, of course, with many. Revisions which ended up in the ten year.

300
00:42:52,540 --> 00:43:03,820
So again, maybe the word boutique is translated by Cuba in the canonical one and nibble in the extra one.

301
00:43:04,180 --> 00:43:08,470
And again, it also shows the extra canonical reading.

302
00:43:09,640 --> 00:43:19,560
And here, most importantly. The this long sentence so paramount that shut them back.

303
00:43:19,560 --> 00:43:34,260
Shut on car and put on a car. I'm gonna say it is translated correctly but let's say ten number you drew or shut up I'm it.

304
00:43:34,560 --> 00:43:44,160
So Sharon the king in Google car number in the extra canonical one and this is indeed again that also is reading

305
00:43:44,940 --> 00:43:54,540
the canonical version somehow reads instead of ten number two you took time to kick in etc. reads ten number.

306
00:43:54,540 --> 00:44:04,110
Yes. [INAUDIBLE] cheeky jaguar you get actually so clearly not reflecting the Sanskrit, the underlined Sanskrit.

307
00:44:08,660 --> 00:44:14,170
Okay. Now, in conclusion,

308
00:44:14,170 --> 00:44:31,510
perhaps since I hope we are a little bit more familiar with the sources of borrowing and mainly the sources of the Indian sources of his borrowing,

309
00:44:31,870 --> 00:44:36,460
I would like to go back to the issue of the authorship of the text.

310
00:44:36,940 --> 00:44:48,480
So if you remember Rousseau commentary in addition to being found in also collected works is also transmitted in the penguin.

311
00:44:49,510 --> 00:44:56,460
So of course there is an issue of authorship, meaning that is this text.

312
00:44:56,500 --> 00:44:59,170
Is this a translation of an Indian text?

313
00:45:00,560 --> 00:45:17,740
It as also again argued by Wootton, the text found in the ten year or rather its authoritative ness or authenticity was doubt by Wootton anyways.

314
00:45:18,430 --> 00:45:25,570
I would like to argue, as has already been done by Dr. Owen and McGee, that there is no doubt for.

315
00:45:27,700 --> 00:45:37,420
For not considering the text as being authored by Alonzo, but in this can be perhaps argued through the following points.

316
00:45:39,490 --> 00:45:46,900
Again, as already mentioned at the beginning of a commentary on the numbers, MVP is mentioned,

317
00:45:47,410 --> 00:45:54,220
albeit without a typo in Roman members, so it also has disciples list of rules on those works.

318
00:45:55,390 --> 00:46:03,130
So even though a specific title is not mentioned, at least we can take for certain that Rosalba.

319
00:46:04,240 --> 00:46:13,000
Excuse me. I wrote a commentary on the Nelson runs on both sides, the numbers and elsewhere in his works.

320
00:46:13,930 --> 00:46:16,840
This may not be a very strong point.

321
00:46:18,730 --> 00:46:28,170
However, at least these verses that he cites in the Clinton tale are also cited various times in the numbers and shape up.

322
00:46:30,540 --> 00:46:36,990
Unlike this very famous verse from the non-Muslim needy people singing Angel not

323
00:46:37,000 --> 00:46:47,610
to warm there and won't dwell on the variance that one can find in this verse.

324
00:46:47,700 --> 00:46:51,570
But I think it's a rather often quoted verse.

325
00:46:52,410 --> 00:47:04,230
It can also be found with a slight difference in the gospel, and it is cited by Rosalba and his children.

326
00:47:05,880 --> 00:47:15,420
So in his investigation of the two vehicles, but it is surprisingly not cited nor commented on in the Notes Sheva.

327
00:47:16,540 --> 00:47:28,390
So in his commentary on the Nelson meeting, which, by the way, indeed does not comment on each and every non-Muslim verse where rather cites verses.

328
00:47:30,510 --> 00:47:40,630
That, according to Roseanne Barr. Show or teach various aspects of Montessori, for instance.

329
00:47:43,510 --> 00:47:50,499
In the section concerning Manju SRI as one who pervades all phenomena.

330
00:47:50,500 --> 00:47:59,410
Roles above would cite a verse from the scene in which she is described as the Pervaiz or somebody who pervades and.

331
00:48:00,580 --> 00:48:09,709
So on and so forth. Again, the third point, maybe slightly more significant,

332
00:48:09,710 --> 00:48:17,810
is that among the very few scriptures quoted in the Nancy Sheva, only three in total, if I'm not mistaken,

333
00:48:18,950 --> 00:48:24,740
very significant are the Bush tantra in 80 or 82 chapters,

334
00:48:24,830 --> 00:48:33,410
also known as the young to get chopped up and the vegetables had done in 75 chapters or Dodger Cooper Or about the middle.

335
00:48:37,090 --> 00:48:50,260
Actually the verse quoted by Rousseau, apart from the Boucher tantrum he quotes only without providing, by the way, the source of his quotations.

336
00:48:50,950 --> 00:48:58,390
He never does so in the and shiver. He simply says in some other text it is stated thus, etc.

337
00:48:58,990 --> 00:49:07,210
So he quotes two fathers, and only the second one precisely corresponds to a powder found in the bottom.

338
00:49:07,870 --> 00:49:17,230
While the first one may be a rewriting or a summary of three other orders from the character.

339
00:49:18,160 --> 00:49:27,680
While the quotation from the middle of again only two part as is verbatim as you would find it in the middle.

340
00:49:28,630 --> 00:49:35,500
So again, the Rosenbach, as is well known, wrote a commentary on the copper tundra,

341
00:49:36,400 --> 00:49:43,570
the kinship bell, and he cites the large review at tundra, both the short and the long version.

342
00:49:44,170 --> 00:49:50,500
Numerous times in his three main works, the times of dogged the kinship bell and the picture of.

343
00:49:51,970 --> 00:50:06,000
And as we saw above, Rusal reuses these two powders on the go, but do better to rephrase a concept found in less about China's.

344
00:50:13,390 --> 00:50:16,480
It's difficult because it's a human moment.

345
00:50:16,750 --> 00:50:23,650
Yes. I think this is the last page. As we've seen above.

346
00:50:25,420 --> 00:50:32,889
In the name kinship. Others heavy reliance on textual material associated with the subcultural meaning that he

347
00:50:32,890 --> 00:50:38,980
borrows from his commentary on the nationality and associated with assimilated genealogist,

348
00:50:40,150 --> 00:50:53,620
who translated the commentary by philosopher Jack and who wrote a commentary on Elizabeth Girard's maternal uncle's sadhana,

349
00:50:54,340 --> 00:50:57,440
and who also wrote a commentary on the Savita.

350
00:50:59,180 --> 00:51:08,290
Now, as for the, let's say, association between the rules and the classified chapters,

351
00:51:08,740 --> 00:51:16,310
the genealogy of Pete Rose on vice credited with the translation of two works by be less about Jerome or mythology.

352
00:51:17,990 --> 00:51:26,510
Again, the authorship of many works ascribed to Gigabyte Dorjee or Dorjee or Leena.

353
00:51:26,840 --> 00:51:29,630
It is very disputed and complicated.

354
00:51:31,490 --> 00:51:39,770
At any rate, one of these translation is transmitted in the tenure and the second one is transmitted in also as collected works.

355
00:51:40,670 --> 00:51:53,870
However, as noted by Tashi Dogen, this second one, rather, appears to be a ritual rearrangement compiled by arrows, but from the classified text,

356
00:51:55,700 --> 00:51:59,690
as also argued by Professor Dorjee in a recent blog post,

357
00:52:00,110 --> 00:52:07,790
and also by most likely derived his knowledge of the function of Mandala and cut out tantra and its idea of the well put up.

358
00:52:07,790 --> 00:52:17,809
Rumi's, which he alludes to in two works of is from the last seven Judas and then eight which side seven has

359
00:52:17,810 --> 00:52:27,860
on the 12th is from this picture in full so evidently the held be less about should I in high esteem.

360
00:52:29,140 --> 00:52:38,380
Or at any rate, he based his ideas, many of his ideas or some of his ideas, rather sorry on his words.

361
00:52:39,310 --> 00:52:44,980
And as for the association between Rosenbaum's Rudy Giuliani's gift, as mentioned earlier,

362
00:52:45,550 --> 00:52:50,770
Rosen by said to have been either the student or the reincarnation of the stated generic GOP.

363
00:52:51,190 --> 00:52:57,280
And here he is also credited with a commentary on the latter's grammar, the mangled search at Abu.

364
00:52:59,990 --> 00:53:04,190
This is the last page, I promise.

365
00:53:06,070 --> 00:53:18,280
Perhaps the strongest point not to doubt Rosenberg's authorship of this text is that we can find many passages in the nonsense Sherpa,

366
00:53:18,910 --> 00:53:24,100
which are very similar to other passages in other works by Rosalba.

367
00:53:24,880 --> 00:53:34,600
So, for instance, this very short phrase in one in numbers, in the numbers in Sherpa is found almost verbatim in the print.

368
00:53:34,600 --> 00:53:48,480
Up to date, only one people and longer ones are found variously in the kinship objets or the commentary on the book Aqaba and also in his book.

369
00:53:49,150 --> 00:53:54,460
Yes, I'm finished. Thank you very much for your patience and attention.