1
00:00:01,860 --> 00:00:12,510
Know. This is a very special subject.

2
00:00:12,750 --> 00:00:20,790
Quantum mechanics is is quite unique in in your undergraduate training in the sense that is the piece of physics,

3
00:00:20,790 --> 00:00:23,940
which is it is the great intellectual accomplishment of the last century.

4
00:00:24,660 --> 00:00:31,260
It is the piece of physics which is least understood, relativity and so on.

5
00:00:31,890 --> 00:00:36,480
But is is perfectly clear and tied up.

6
00:00:36,480 --> 00:00:39,690
Of course there is the theory of everything or whatever on the frontier of the subject.

7
00:00:39,690 --> 00:00:49,079
But here we have a piece of undergraduate physics which is, it's universally agreed, is not properly understood in its deepest underpinnings.

8
00:00:49,080 --> 00:00:54,090
It's still fundamentally mysterious and it's also quite extraordinarily specific to physics,

9
00:00:54,810 --> 00:00:58,290
and yet it completely underpins it's absolutely fundamental.

10
00:00:58,410 --> 00:01:04,440
You cannot understand anything about your body, the table, the sun, anything.

11
00:01:04,620 --> 00:01:07,860
Everything is a manifestation of quantum mechanics in a very direct way.

12
00:01:08,820 --> 00:01:11,459
So so it's an extraordinarily exciting subject.

13
00:01:11,460 --> 00:01:19,440
And I think it's what's particularly exciting for you should be that there's that there's are pieces of this still to be put in place.

14
00:01:19,440 --> 00:01:21,719
There are mysteries here still to be resolved.

15
00:01:21,720 --> 00:01:28,890
And I think there's no reason why the person who does that or people who contribute to doing that should not be here in the audience today.

16
00:01:29,040 --> 00:01:30,779
I don't think it can be done by people of my generation.

17
00:01:30,780 --> 00:01:36,390
It's looks as if it's it's something that still needs to be done by people coming along with a fresh look at it.

18
00:01:36,840 --> 00:01:42,420
So it's extraordinarily worth working out. Physics isn't easy, and quantum mechanics is one of the hard bits of physics.

19
00:01:42,930 --> 00:01:48,120
This course isn't easy, but it's it's extremely well worth working at.

20
00:01:48,120 --> 00:01:51,209
And I would stress the importance of working on the problems.

21
00:01:51,210 --> 00:01:54,360
There are masses of problems, right? Too many problems.

22
00:01:54,510 --> 00:01:58,499
There may be you will think when you look at the problem sets, which you just some abstract to the problems.

23
00:01:58,500 --> 00:02:05,489
There are already too many problems but it is it is the way to learn and understand about physics is to is to

24
00:02:05,490 --> 00:02:11,010
work with with the apparatus and think about the meaning of the solutions that you get and so on and so forth.

25
00:02:11,010 --> 00:02:14,310
And so I really would urge you to work as hard as you can at those problems.

26
00:02:15,060 --> 00:02:21,810
And the reason for providing solutions to many of the problems is, is because you would even if you can solve the problem yourself,

27
00:02:21,810 --> 00:02:27,030
you might find it interesting to see how I solved the problem, you know, and develop your technique in that way.

28
00:02:27,230 --> 00:02:30,510
Of course, quantum mechanics has a very funny way of looking at the world.

29
00:02:30,660 --> 00:02:38,820
That's part of the problem. And it's by its it's by constant practice and and experience that you'll deepen that understanding.

30
00:02:39,870 --> 00:02:44,160
Okay. So Einstein, as everybody knows, didn't like quantum mechanics.

31
00:02:45,270 --> 00:02:53,339
But I think the reason why he didn't like quantum mechanics, which he expressed as God doesn't play dice, was not a good reason.

32
00:02:53,340 --> 00:02:57,240
Then maybe it may be that one shouldn't like quantum mechanics, but that's not a good reason.

33
00:02:57,360 --> 00:03:01,409
Let's just think about that for a moment. Quantum mechanics.

34
00:03:01,410 --> 00:03:07,650
Sorry. Physics is about predicting the future. It's about saying what's going to happen if you lean a ladder up against a wall.

35
00:03:08,070 --> 00:03:12,330
You would like to know if you try in a letter whether it it's going to slip and fall down, that kind of thing.

36
00:03:13,830 --> 00:03:23,790
And if the data on which we work are always uncertain and the systems with which we work and never isolated,

37
00:03:23,790 --> 00:03:30,779
and our theory crudely always applies to something which for which we physics is

38
00:03:30,780 --> 00:03:34,920
an apparatus where if you put in certain statements about what the system is,

39
00:03:36,480 --> 00:03:39,660
for example, with a ladder, what the roughness of the ground is,

40
00:03:39,660 --> 00:03:43,710
what the roughness of the wall is, what the weight of the latter is, and so on and so forth.

41
00:03:43,920 --> 00:03:49,860
If you describe the system accurately, then you will get a precise prediction out.

42
00:03:50,190 --> 00:03:56,159
But in the real world, not only can you not, there's always uncertainty in the in the data.

43
00:03:56,160 --> 00:04:03,149
You can't say exactly how rough the the floor is because the roughness on the floor varies from place to place.

44
00:04:03,150 --> 00:04:08,760
You're not quite sure where you put down the ladder and so on. So the data that you're working with are uncertain.

45
00:04:09,570 --> 00:04:15,630
So what you should really do the best that you can actually do if you really want to push yourself to the most precise results,

46
00:04:15,870 --> 00:04:23,069
is derive probability distributions. You can say that the probability of the ladder slipping from this position is such and such.

47
00:04:23,070 --> 00:04:25,770
The probability of that of slipping from that position is such and such.

48
00:04:26,190 --> 00:04:32,879
In simple cases, you have a very sharp you have you have a very narrow range of probabilities.

49
00:04:32,880 --> 00:04:37,560
The probability in certain positions is almost one that it won't slip in other places.

50
00:04:37,560 --> 00:04:40,320
It's almost one that it will slip.

51
00:04:40,320 --> 00:04:47,340
And so we can give a simple answer and we say, Well, the critical angle for it slipping is 43 degrees and 34 minutes or whatever else.

52
00:04:47,340 --> 00:04:50,040
But if you really, really, really want to know something accurately,

53
00:04:50,340 --> 00:04:56,430
if you really want to push your predictions to the to the to the extreme or to as hard as you can,

54
00:04:56,670 --> 00:05:00,960
you will have to calculate the probability distribution and calculating the probable distribution is hard.

55
00:05:02,310 --> 00:05:09,860
In classical physics, it's hard, and we will find that in quantum mechanics is actually rather easier to calculate, probably solutions.

56
00:05:10,110 --> 00:05:15,120
With a quantum mechanical apparatus than it is with the classical physical operations, which is just as well because in quantum mechanics,

57
00:05:15,240 --> 00:05:25,050
where we're we're working on the theory, it arose out of attempts to understand things that are so small that they are always seriously not isolated.

58
00:05:25,350 --> 00:05:33,810
So an electron carries a charge. Consequently, it is always in in contact with it's always interacting with the electromagnetic field.

59
00:05:34,350 --> 00:05:39,510
But the electromagnetic field is, it turns out, always, always quivering.

60
00:05:40,650 --> 00:05:43,250
It's so we never know what the electromagnetic field,

61
00:05:43,260 --> 00:05:48,809
even even under the most precise control of the electromagnetic field, you put your electron inside some resonant cavity.

62
00:05:48,810 --> 00:05:52,050
You call the resonant cavity as close to absolute zero as you can, and so on.

63
00:05:52,290 --> 00:05:57,240
No matter how hard you work, it turns out that electromagnetic field is in an unknown configuration.

64
00:05:57,280 --> 00:06:01,320
Consequently, your electron is subject to uncertain disturbances.

65
00:06:01,500 --> 00:06:03,780
Consequently, what the electron is going to do,

66
00:06:04,080 --> 00:06:11,010
the best you can do is predict probabilistically in the same sense that when the horses are racing at Sandown Park or whatever,

67
00:06:11,220 --> 00:06:17,260
the results are going to be probabilistic. You don't know what a particular horse is going to do on a particular day because of all the it.

68
00:06:17,460 --> 00:06:19,830
It's not an isolated system. It may have eaten something.

69
00:06:19,830 --> 00:06:26,730
It didn't approve of a breakfast that morning, etc. So so it is natural that we should be working with probabilities.

70
00:06:27,390 --> 00:06:29,370
It is natural that the calculation.

71
00:06:29,370 --> 00:06:38,910
So whereas in classical physics, when you're talking about a cricket ball or a a shell shot out of a out of a howitzer,

72
00:06:40,140 --> 00:06:48,150
you you operate under the fiction, which is a very good fiction that at every point in the trajectory, at every time,

73
00:06:48,960 --> 00:06:55,530
every precisely measured time, the shell central mass of the shell has a very precise coordinates.

74
00:06:55,530 --> 00:06:59,430
And these coordinates progress in a very accurately calculable way.

75
00:06:59,640 --> 00:07:06,150
You have only one number to count. Well, three numbers, I suppose the X, Y and Z coordinates of the shell to calculate it each time.

76
00:07:06,480 --> 00:07:09,750
Uh, you don't have to calculate a probability distribution.

77
00:07:10,500 --> 00:07:12,720
Well, in simple. In the simple case, you don't.

78
00:07:13,740 --> 00:07:21,450
What if you're considering what will happen when electron leads leaves an electron gun because of the quivering electromagnetic field,

79
00:07:21,450 --> 00:07:27,300
whatever uncertainty there was in the configuration of electron before it shot out of the gun and so on,

80
00:07:28,230 --> 00:07:32,250
it's inevitable if you're calculating a probability distribution for the electron is going to go,

81
00:07:32,610 --> 00:07:37,139
and calculating a probability distribution for every possible value of X is clearly

82
00:07:37,140 --> 00:07:41,070
going to be a [INAUDIBLE] of a lot more work than calculating one particular value of X,

83
00:07:41,460 --> 00:07:50,040
right? So that's that's why it's going to be mathematically complex and why it's going to involve probabilities.

84
00:07:51,390 --> 00:07:57,750
And let's just remind ourselves of some basic facts about probabilities, which I think is this correct,

85
00:07:57,750 --> 00:08:01,050
that in Professor Blondell this course, he's already talked about the laws of probability.

86
00:08:01,890 --> 00:08:08,640
Yeah. Good. So the things we need to we need to just remind ourselves, obviously, if we've got two independent events,

87
00:08:08,910 --> 00:08:21,710
the probability that we get, the probability that we get the event A and the event B is going to be the product of what's A and P.

88
00:08:22,620 --> 00:08:26,130
So we multiply the probabilities of independent events.

89
00:08:29,090 --> 00:08:40,550
Such as that. If you throw to dice the probability that one day comes up with number one and the other one comes up with number six.

90
00:08:40,850 --> 00:08:45,500
So might be the probability that the first die, the red one comes up with number one.

91
00:08:45,710 --> 00:08:49,640
And PB might be the probability that a black guy comes up with the number six.

92
00:08:49,880 --> 00:08:56,290
Then this is the probability that the red one comes up with one, which they say six, whatever.

93
00:08:56,300 --> 00:08:59,840
This is the probability of that particular configuration. Okay.

94
00:09:00,350 --> 00:09:01,790
And you get you get a product.

95
00:09:01,790 --> 00:09:14,660
And the other rule that's important for us is that the probability of A or B is equal to A plus P, B if they're exclusive events.

96
00:09:16,310 --> 00:09:26,600
So that's the probability that if I throw a single die, that I get either a one or a six because I can't get both a one and a six simultaneously.

97
00:09:26,600 --> 00:09:27,950
Either get a one or I get a six.

98
00:09:27,950 --> 00:09:34,520
So these are exclusive events, and the probability that I get either a one or a six is just the sum of these two probabilities.

99
00:09:36,140 --> 00:09:44,600
So those are the and following on from that, if we have an X is a random variable.

100
00:09:46,490 --> 00:09:56,510
So that's something like what happens when we like the number we get when we throw a die and then we define the thing called the expectation of X.

101
00:10:04,670 --> 00:10:12,920
To be the sum of the probability of the if outcome times the value that X takes on the outcome.

102
00:10:13,460 --> 00:10:20,300
And it's sort of roughly speaking, it's often called the average of X, but that is to say if you make a number end of trials,

103
00:10:20,300 --> 00:10:23,690
work out the average values that you get of X, you're hoping to get a value.

104
00:10:23,690 --> 00:10:30,560
You should get a value which is close to this. It will never really agree with this, but the idea is that as you do more and more experiments,

105
00:10:30,570 --> 00:10:38,960
the average that you of all those experiments will converge in a rattle in a narrow or narrow range around this expectation value.

106
00:10:39,680 --> 00:10:47,870
And we have a few simple rules that if we have to random variables and add their results and then take the expectation value,

107
00:10:48,110 --> 00:10:52,550
then that is the expectation value of X plus the expectation value of Y.

108
00:10:54,590 --> 00:11:00,680
That's always the case whether the events or the variables are independent or not.

109
00:11:02,210 --> 00:11:15,340
So. And zillions of branches of of science use probabilities.

110
00:11:15,340 --> 00:11:21,670
Right. It's a major feature in medicine, major feature in the in the financial markets.

111
00:11:22,910 --> 00:11:26,049
And they they use probabilities in just the same way the physicists do.

112
00:11:26,050 --> 00:11:30,430
But physicists have a unique way of calculating probabilities, which nobody else uses.

113
00:11:30,430 --> 00:11:39,880
And I think this is a central mystery. And that's because in quantum mechanics, we calculate these probabilities through amplitudes.

114
00:11:45,420 --> 00:11:48,450
That's to say every probability that we're interested in.

115
00:11:49,320 --> 00:11:55,170
P is the mod square of some complex number.

116
00:11:55,920 --> 00:11:59,490
It's amplitude. It's probability amplitude.

117
00:12:01,860 --> 00:12:05,909
So we never calculate this directly. We always calculate a probability amplitude.

118
00:12:05,910 --> 00:12:09,000
And having got it, we take it, which is a complex number.

119
00:12:15,340 --> 00:12:18,850
And we interpret the mod square of that complex number as the probability.

120
00:12:20,530 --> 00:12:24,990
And so, so all of quantum I've got the purpose.

121
00:12:25,000 --> 00:12:30,150
My purpose in the next few lectures is to persuade you that all of quantum mechanics and all its strangeness follows from this.

122
00:12:30,160 --> 00:12:34,479
From this business here, which nobody else uses this.

123
00:12:34,480 --> 00:12:35,950
There's no other branch of knowledge.

124
00:12:35,950 --> 00:12:42,819
You know, there are people in the city who talk about the quantum mechanical or even people who name their hedge funds, quantum,

125
00:12:42,820 --> 00:12:46,809
etc. They like to have a connection with, with, with quantum mechanics,

126
00:12:46,810 --> 00:12:50,260
but it's completely bogus because they never calculate probabilities in this way.

127
00:12:52,360 --> 00:12:59,830
Okay. Now the consequence of this is that the probability of supposing something could happen by two routes, right?

128
00:13:00,640 --> 00:13:12,459
So let's, let's be specific. Let's suppose that we have an electron gun and we have a double slit arrangement.

129
00:13:12,460 --> 00:13:17,620
Perhaps I draw drawing drawings. Never. Very good. Something like this.

130
00:13:18,130 --> 00:13:22,360
And we're firing electrons out of here, sort of in scatter pattern.

131
00:13:23,050 --> 00:13:30,520
And some of them go through holes and then hit our detector off screen over here centilitre,

132
00:13:30,580 --> 00:13:34,059
photographic plate, whatever you want to use and others bounce.

133
00:13:34,060 --> 00:13:39,010
Oops. And then so we'll call this s and we'll call this T.

134
00:13:39,010 --> 00:13:48,790
There are two. If we focus on a particular place X here on the screen, there are two ways in which an electron can arrive there.

135
00:13:48,790 --> 00:13:54,729
It can go through the top hole or the bottom hole and we'll call the the path through the top hole,

136
00:13:54,730 --> 00:13:57,520
the path s and the path through the bottom hole, the path T.

137
00:13:59,110 --> 00:14:05,590
So if you what we're interested in calculating is the probability that we get the electron arriving at X.

138
00:14:08,230 --> 00:14:14,950
So the probability of arriving at X should be calculated from some amplitude.

139
00:14:14,950 --> 00:14:22,839
And the rule is that that amplitude is the amplitude to take the path s plus the amplitude to take the path.

140
00:14:22,840 --> 00:14:28,780
T And then, of course that gives us the amplitude to arrive there regardless, right?

141
00:14:28,780 --> 00:14:33,640
So this is like the probability rule up there, P, A or B,

142
00:14:33,970 --> 00:14:41,320
this is the probability that it got there by either route S or route t is the sum well up there.

143
00:14:41,320 --> 00:14:42,879
It's the sum of two probabilities.

144
00:14:42,880 --> 00:14:50,470
But the rule here is this the sum of the amplitude for is just the sum of the amplitudes, and the probability is the square of this.

145
00:14:51,600 --> 00:14:59,380
What does that give us? That gives us because we now undertake the mod square of two complex, the sum of two complex numbers.

146
00:14:59,770 --> 00:15:19,000
This is a mod squared plus a t squared plus a s a t complex conjugate plus a s complex conjugate a t.

147
00:15:19,930 --> 00:15:27,400
So that stuff follows just from the ordinary rules for taking the complex, the amplitude of sum of two complex numbers.

148
00:15:27,910 --> 00:15:40,390
But this, we know, is the probability that it got there through S so that's P that it took root s plus P that took root T plus this stuff,

149
00:15:41,620 --> 00:15:51,009
which can be this stuff here can be written as twice the real part of as a star

150
00:15:51,010 --> 00:15:59,860
t so the probability that something happens when it can happen in two mutually

151
00:15:59,860 --> 00:16:03,849
exclusive ways because it either goes through the top or it goes through the bottom

152
00:16:03,850 --> 00:16:08,860
hole is the probability that it is the sum of the probabilities that it took,

153
00:16:09,070 --> 00:16:17,709
i.e. the root, plus this funny stuff down here that's a consequence of calculating probabilities, using amplitudes,

154
00:16:17,710 --> 00:16:24,970
and this fundamental principle that if something can happen by this way or by that way, then you add the amplitudes.

155
00:16:24,970 --> 00:16:31,150
You don't add the probabilities. Nobody knows why that's the right rule.

156
00:16:32,470 --> 00:16:35,500
You should reasonably ask me. So how do I know that's the right rule?

157
00:16:36,340 --> 00:16:43,419
And the answer, I think the proper answer to that question is that this is the the fundamental cornerstone of quantum mechanics.

158
00:16:43,420 --> 00:16:46,360
And our civilisation, quite simply depends on quantum mechanics,

159
00:16:46,360 --> 00:16:52,600
because we're all busy communicating with each other using electronics that has been designed using quantum mechanics.

160
00:16:52,870 --> 00:16:58,629
So it's of course, there are Kong there are particular specific experiments that one could one could talk about.

161
00:16:58,630 --> 00:17:05,650
But really, it's not as persuasive as the as as the point that without this, quantum mechanics would make no sense.

162
00:17:05,650 --> 00:17:08,710
And without quantum mechanics, our civilisation would fall apart.

163
00:17:17,160 --> 00:17:23,180
Yeah. Okay, so. So let's think a little bit more about this.

164
00:17:24,050 --> 00:17:30,390
Um, what do we think that these individual probability distributions look like?

165
00:17:30,390 --> 00:17:37,500
In other words, if you, if you covered up one of these things and we're just firing your bullets through one hole, what would you imagine?

166
00:17:37,500 --> 00:17:41,250
Well, of course, you know, your electrons, your bullets, your particles through one hole.

167
00:17:41,460 --> 00:17:48,180
What we would imagine was that the majority that that that the that the probability will be largest on the place

168
00:17:48,180 --> 00:17:55,890
which was formed by a straight line from the centre of the the muzzle of the gun through the hole to the screen.

169
00:17:57,180 --> 00:18:04,600
So you would expect. That piece looked like.

170
00:18:05,080 --> 00:18:11,650
Um, so I wanted to draw a plot of this is going to be X, I guess I better put this is X is nought.

171
00:18:12,400 --> 00:18:20,320
I would expect that look something like this, some kind of vaguely Gaussian, you know, so it's most likely to arrive.

172
00:18:20,360 --> 00:18:24,939
This is the point which is the geometrical is the intersection of the straight lines through the middle of the muzzle,

173
00:18:24,940 --> 00:18:30,309
in the middle of the whole right. And there's some width because the slit has some width of the muzzle,

174
00:18:30,310 --> 00:18:37,780
has some wit some width and doesn't far it doesn't fire bullets exactly in one direction, but in some spray of directions.

175
00:18:40,030 --> 00:18:46,750
And we would expect that P of T correspondingly was the same thing on the other side of the origin.

176
00:18:48,730 --> 00:19:02,950
Right. Um, so if these Gaussians are very narrow, we're expecting that P but P of X at some location here,

177
00:19:02,950 --> 00:19:11,920
say if we chose this place, we'd find that T was about equal to zero P of p of s was some number here.

178
00:19:12,190 --> 00:19:20,590
So this vanished, this amplitude would vanish because because this is the mod square of whatever complex number it is that sits underneath.

179
00:19:21,370 --> 00:19:25,419
And so this term would disappear and we would find, guess what, surprise,

180
00:19:25,420 --> 00:19:31,030
surprise that the probability of arriving in X was indeed, indeed equal to the probability of arriving through S.

181
00:19:31,900 --> 00:19:33,860
But suppose these these things,

182
00:19:33,880 --> 00:19:41,440
and now we're interested in the more interesting case where these are these are really broad distributions and this is a really broad distribution,

183
00:19:43,330 --> 00:19:46,600
but very broad distribution. Okay.

184
00:19:47,260 --> 00:19:52,360
Then there will be places where there's a non-negligible amplitude coming from both sides.

185
00:19:52,360 --> 00:19:58,540
And in fact, by symmetry it's evident that at the origin, in the in the geometrical middle of the screen,

186
00:19:59,170 --> 00:20:03,760
there will be equal amplitudes coming from the equal probabilities expected from both sides.

187
00:20:05,170 --> 00:20:15,580
So in this neighbourhood we're expecting that that that this number is about equal to this number.

188
00:20:15,850 --> 00:20:22,360
And these two numbers have comparable magnitudes.

189
00:20:22,600 --> 00:20:35,499
So let's in fact write a of as is equal to model A, let me put a subscript on it.

190
00:20:35,500 --> 00:20:40,460
Model S E to the I phi s okay.

191
00:20:40,480 --> 00:20:44,410
So this is a complex number. That's, that's a funny quantum mechanical thing.

192
00:20:44,800 --> 00:20:52,230
So it has a it has an amplitude in the technical sense. So this is a quantum amplitude, but it has an amplitude in the sense of complex numbers,

193
00:20:52,240 --> 00:20:56,530
a modulus sitting in front here and then it must have some phase up there.

194
00:20:56,800 --> 00:21:08,110
Similarly, we'll write that a t is equal to a t, e to the i, i t and both.

195
00:21:08,920 --> 00:21:12,940
And everything here will be a function of position down on the screen.

196
00:21:12,940 --> 00:21:16,900
Right? This this amplitude depends on where you are on the screen.

197
00:21:18,410 --> 00:21:22,870
This does and we expect that this does we expect all of these bits of the complex number depend on position.

198
00:21:23,230 --> 00:21:28,750
But when we're in the middle here so near centre of screen.

199
00:21:33,590 --> 00:21:45,020
We are expecting that the modulus of ACE is about equal to the modulus of 80 because this is the square root of the

200
00:21:45,020 --> 00:21:51,110
probability of getting there and this is the square root of the probability of getting there through only this route only.

201
00:21:51,110 --> 00:21:57,019
And we can't see any difference between the two. So what does the combined probability look like then?

202
00:21:57,020 --> 00:22:07,760
P of x is on the order of it's about equal to two times the probability of getting through shall we.

203
00:22:08,510 --> 00:22:14,000
Through through s because it's about equal to yes.

204
00:22:15,020 --> 00:22:27,980
But now we're going to have plus twice we're going to have a s mod squared.

205
00:22:29,460 --> 00:22:36,270
But you know what we. Right.

206
00:22:36,270 --> 00:22:42,560
Because. Because we're saying that that up there, we've got a of's times a start.

207
00:22:43,380 --> 00:22:48,040
But we're saying that the modulus of ace is about equal to the modulus of 80.

208
00:22:48,060 --> 00:23:03,300
So I can just put in a, uh, that price just becomes this times e to the I try to three times the real part of e to the I phi is minus five t.

209
00:23:06,210 --> 00:23:09,420
But this we recognise is the probability piece.

210
00:23:09,750 --> 00:23:15,780
So this is about equal to two piece, one plus.

211
00:23:15,990 --> 00:23:20,570
And the real part of this of course is the cosine bias minus five t.

212
00:23:22,860 --> 00:23:26,880
So this is what we're expecting only it's only an approximate relation and it's only valid near the middle.

213
00:23:27,300 --> 00:23:38,340
But, but the conclusion of this, the implication of this rule for adding for adding the amplitudes is that the probability

214
00:23:38,340 --> 00:23:42,620
is a function of position near the centre is going to be what you would naively expect.

215
00:23:42,630 --> 00:23:51,470
So this is the classical result. Right. The classical result is the probability of arriving.

216
00:23:51,470 --> 00:23:59,630
There is twice the probability of getting there through either one of the slits, because each slits contribute in the same probability.

217
00:23:59,960 --> 00:24:08,390
But this is now being multiplied by one plus cosine of this totally quantum mechanical bit.

218
00:24:12,590 --> 00:24:15,830
And this bit is called the quantum interference term.

219
00:24:20,010 --> 00:24:31,649
And the extra. So so the prediction is since this cosine so this difference will calculate well this difference between the phases is later on.

220
00:24:31,650 --> 00:24:35,030
We can't we can't put a number on it at the moment but.

221
00:24:35,580 --> 00:24:39,300
But we do expect fire and fight to be functions of position.

222
00:24:40,080 --> 00:24:45,000
And so by default, we have to expect that that this thing is varying with position.

223
00:24:45,000 --> 00:24:50,670
And as the cosine is the argument, the cosine varies with position through, you know, go through not to pi and so on.

224
00:24:51,000 --> 00:24:55,110
The cosine is going to go from from 1 to -1.

225
00:24:55,120 --> 00:25:03,030
And this probability of arrival is going to go from nothing to four times the classical sorry to twice the classical probability four times.

226
00:25:04,350 --> 00:25:16,320
So what we're expecting is that, is that at the end of the day, P of X is going to do some kind of oscillation.

227
00:25:19,530 --> 00:25:25,980
This is only valid in a small region of X, but it is it is an unexpected.

228
00:25:27,570 --> 00:25:32,550
It is surely a surprising result. So this is two times classical.

229
00:25:35,290 --> 00:25:50,679
Probability and this is zero. So that's that's the phenomenon of quantum interference is a is an inevitable consequence of this ordinary rule for

230
00:25:50,680 --> 00:25:55,600
adding amplitudes and calculating probabilities from the sum of the amplitudes rather than adding the probabilities.

231
00:25:56,230 --> 00:25:58,630
That is what makes quantum mechanics special.

232
00:25:58,810 --> 00:26:04,510
And that is something is a phenomenon which doesn't see and nobody else uses probability encounters the need to do this.

233
00:26:04,810 --> 00:26:08,470
Only physicists encounter this need. That, I think, is the real mystery.

234
00:26:10,240 --> 00:26:15,960
How are we doing? Okay.

235
00:26:18,120 --> 00:26:25,560
Of course. We have to ask, why is it that this.

236
00:26:29,200 --> 00:26:35,590
If you farm machine gun bullets through slits and stuff, we're not expecting to find that there's a safe place to stand.

237
00:26:37,030 --> 00:26:45,220
Every every yard or every millimetre or any or any distance in these places where no machine gun bullets are going to arrive, we don't believe exist.

238
00:26:47,380 --> 00:26:52,270
And you have to ask the question, why not? And the answer we will we will calculate the answer later on.

239
00:26:52,270 --> 00:27:00,310
But the answer is going to be that as the mass of the particles, your firing goes up from the mass of an electron up to the mass of the bullet,

240
00:27:01,870 --> 00:27:06,850
the pattern, this pattern stays the same, but it gets more and more and more and more compressed.

241
00:27:06,970 --> 00:27:12,190
There's this distance between places where it's safe to stand,

242
00:27:12,220 --> 00:27:17,980
get smaller and smaller and smaller and smaller until it becomes ludicrously small in the case of machine gun bullets.

243
00:27:18,970 --> 00:27:23,260
And and when you make any measurement, when you make any measurement with machine gun bullets,

244
00:27:23,500 --> 00:27:27,700
you inevitably average over the places where the bullets are extremely likely to arise,

245
00:27:27,700 --> 00:27:32,830
twice as likely to arise as in classical physics and the places where it's safe to stand.

246
00:27:33,130 --> 00:27:41,709
So you inevitably average over these places and you end up with this average found that you're not able to measure anything.

247
00:27:41,710 --> 00:27:46,630
But this average, nobody has figured out a way to measure this anything but this average in the case of things like machine gun bullets.

248
00:27:46,810 --> 00:27:48,670
So that's how we recover classical physics.

249
00:27:48,880 --> 00:27:55,480
But quantum mechanics is asserting that there really are these places where it is safe to stand if you were small enough.

250
00:27:59,950 --> 00:28:05,200
Okay. So now let's have a slightly let's talk about quantum states.

251
00:28:13,030 --> 00:28:17,350
So my claim is that essentially everything follows from what we've already covered,

252
00:28:18,670 --> 00:28:24,820
that it's all a consequence of this interference business through using probability amplitudes instead of probabilities.

253
00:28:25,980 --> 00:28:35,310
So but now we have to have some apparatus. So we have got some we we have in a lab, some system, something that we're trying to investigate.

254
00:28:35,320 --> 00:28:40,000
So in this case, it would be a particle spin this particle. Let's fantasise about spin this particles.

255
00:28:40,000 --> 00:28:43,450
That's particles which do not have any they don't that aren't gyros.

256
00:28:44,580 --> 00:28:45,760
Let's fantasise about them.

257
00:28:45,760 --> 00:28:54,820
Although it turns out that spineless particles are very red things like electrons and neutrons and protons, even our little gyros.

258
00:28:55,780 --> 00:29:00,069
So if we had to spin this particle, we could. It's a it's a system.

259
00:29:00,070 --> 00:29:05,230
It's a dynamic system. And you can ask yourself, So how do I characterise the state of this particle?

260
00:29:05,410 --> 00:29:11,739
Well, there are things used to characterise it state of course by measuring something and what, what can you measure?

261
00:29:11,740 --> 00:29:18,910
You can measure the X, Y and Z coordinates, you can measure the X, Y and z momenta.

262
00:29:19,030 --> 00:29:23,439
You could measure its energy, you could measure its angular momentum. These are all things that you could measure.

263
00:29:23,440 --> 00:29:25,210
So there's a range of things that you could measure.

264
00:29:25,510 --> 00:29:28,870
And in quantum mechanics, these measure, these things, you could measure a rule called observables.

265
00:29:31,510 --> 00:29:42,220
Then you characterise the system by saying what results you would get if you made these measurements now in quantum mechanics, remember?

266
00:29:42,700 --> 00:29:48,370
Or you could you we've accepted that there's a probabilistic aspect,

267
00:29:48,370 --> 00:29:55,870
so we don't expect to be able to say that if I measure X, I will get the value 3.1415963 whatever.

268
00:29:55,870 --> 00:30:01,149
Right metres. I expect to have to come clean and say well I don't know, there's a probability distribution.

269
00:30:01,150 --> 00:30:06,070
I think it's about round here. That's, that's just how life is going to be.

270
00:30:07,240 --> 00:30:15,400
So what do you do? What you do of course is you specify the quantum amplitudes to obtain certain results of measurements.

271
00:30:16,330 --> 00:30:19,720
So we characterise the system.

272
00:30:24,400 --> 00:30:44,670
The state of our system. By measuring, by giving quantum amplitudes.

273
00:30:55,010 --> 00:31:03,840
Two possible outcomes of measurements. Comes.

274
00:31:13,030 --> 00:31:23,810
I think that's pretty reasonable. And it turns out in quantum mechanics that the possible outcomes are sometimes but not always restricted.

275
00:31:23,830 --> 00:31:28,510
So if you have an electron which is free to wander the universe,

276
00:31:28,990 --> 00:31:34,870
then the possible outcomes of its x coordinate can be values from minus infinity to plus infinity.

277
00:31:34,870 --> 00:31:45,160
All real numbers are on and the range of possible values or what are called the spectrum so that the possible outcomes.

278
00:31:51,670 --> 00:31:59,580
The numbers you can get. They formed the spectrum.

279
00:32:03,980 --> 00:32:09,600
The spectrum. Observable.

280
00:32:11,710 --> 00:32:26,130
So the spectrum of X. Just generally minus infinity to infinity, which is not a very interesting.

281
00:32:26,150 --> 00:32:37,040
I mean, so there's no interesting restriction there. Similarly, the spectrum of X, the momentum in the X direction is usually the same,

282
00:32:38,300 --> 00:32:42,830
but the spectrum, for example, of the Z component of angular momentum.

283
00:32:43,340 --> 00:32:51,409
Jay Z Uh, turns out to be only discrete values.

284
00:32:51,410 --> 00:32:56,450
It turns out that will show that that is the case, that you can have numbers like dot, dot,

285
00:32:56,450 --> 00:33:09,950
dot, comma, k, minus one, h, bar k, h, bar k, plus one h, bar k plus two h, bar and so on.

286
00:33:10,190 --> 00:33:18,080
Where K is equal to either for for a particular particle, it's either equal to nought or it's equal to a half.

287
00:33:19,760 --> 00:33:27,049
So the spectrum can be discrete set of numbers or it can be a continuous set of numbers.

288
00:33:27,050 --> 00:33:40,670
This is a property of the observable. The spectrum of the energy is is often a discrete set of numbers, not always e0e what e to,

289
00:33:40,850 --> 00:33:46,249
but you have to calculate by hard grind and we'll spend a great deal of time calculating the spectrum of h.

290
00:33:46,250 --> 00:33:50,690
It's a very it turns out to be a key to find out what that is for a particular system.

291
00:33:52,100 --> 00:33:59,780
So all these observables have spectra and how you would characterise the state of

292
00:33:59,780 --> 00:34:04,009
the system if you were talking about its energy is you would give the amplitude.

293
00:34:04,010 --> 00:34:10,040
So so we could give, we could possibly specify the state of our system.

294
00:34:14,110 --> 00:34:21,020
By giving. The amplitude to get e one.

295
00:34:21,110 --> 00:34:27,710
Sorry, e zero. The lowest energy. The amplitude to get the energy, the next energy above the amplitude, etc.

296
00:34:29,900 --> 00:34:33,590
So let's call these. Let's call this a zero.

297
00:34:34,130 --> 00:34:37,620
A one. Etc.

298
00:34:39,750 --> 00:34:45,930
So if you the idea here is that that for some systems, if you know the complex number,

299
00:34:45,930 --> 00:34:52,650
a zero whose mod square gives you the probability of if you would measure the energy that you've got, the possible value is zero.

300
00:34:52,980 --> 00:34:58,650
And you also knew this number, a one whose mod square is this probability, and if you knew this number,

301
00:34:58,800 --> 00:35:03,170
whose mod square was the probability of getting the energy level and so on, right?

302
00:35:04,080 --> 00:35:10,950
In general, there'll be an infinite number of these. If you knew all of these amplitudes, you would completely know.

303
00:35:10,950 --> 00:35:17,800
You would have completely specified the nominal state of that system. What do I mean by that?

304
00:35:17,830 --> 00:35:29,200
What I mean by that is if I knew all of those amplitudes, I could calculate the amplitude to find any other amplitude that you might inquire about.

305
00:35:29,200 --> 00:35:33,490
For example, I could find the amplitude to find my system at the Place X,

306
00:35:34,120 --> 00:35:41,649
which or I could calculate from those amplitudes, I could calculate the amplitude to find that the momentum is the value.

307
00:35:41,650 --> 00:35:47,590
P So we have the concept here of a set of amplitudes.

308
00:35:47,590 --> 00:35:59,800
It's clear, I hope it's clear that you will need a set of amplitudes to define the state of a system in quantum mechanics, in classical mechanics.

309
00:36:00,070 --> 00:36:08,830
What do you need to know? You need to know for a particle. You need to know X and p, x and x, y and z and p, y and Z.

310
00:36:08,830 --> 00:36:13,239
Because then you've pin down where the thing is and how fast it's moving and when you know

311
00:36:13,240 --> 00:36:17,830
that build all done six numbers down because from that you could calculate the energy,

312
00:36:17,830 --> 00:36:21,370
you calculate the angle, momentum, you know that. But in quantum mechanics,

313
00:36:21,370 --> 00:36:31,749
it's not life isn't going to be so simple because we've agreed that you probably don't know what X is and you probably don't know what is.

314
00:36:31,750 --> 00:36:35,110
The best you can hope to know is what these probability distributions are.

315
00:36:35,680 --> 00:36:42,430
And we've agreed that these probability distributions are for reasons that nobody understands going to be defined in terms of these complex numbers,

316
00:36:42,430 --> 00:36:45,520
the quantum amplitudes whose modes square give the probabilities.

317
00:36:47,020 --> 00:37:01,300
So knowing, specifying complete set of information is a is a matter of writing down a long list, unfortunately, of quantum amplitudes.

318
00:37:02,800 --> 00:37:07,840
The good news is that you don't need to know all possible.

319
00:37:07,840 --> 00:37:11,020
You don't need to write down all possible amplitudes, quantum amplitudes,

320
00:37:11,320 --> 00:37:17,380
because there are rules which we're going to develop for calculating from a complete set of quantum amplitudes,

321
00:37:18,670 --> 00:37:29,280
all other quantum amplitudes that might be of interest. And we'll do a concrete example probably next time.

322
00:37:31,590 --> 00:37:35,530
Maybe we already. Maybe we do have time to just do this. Yeah.

323
00:37:35,570 --> 00:37:36,890
Okay, so let's have a look at this.

324
00:37:38,300 --> 00:37:54,470
So I said that electrons and protons and neutrons and quarks, a huge number of an elementary particles have a gyros.

325
00:37:54,470 --> 00:37:55,970
So they have an intrinsic spin.

326
00:37:56,600 --> 00:38:04,460
They are gyroscopes, they have an intrinsic spin, and they're called spin half particles for reasons that will become apparent in a moment.

327
00:38:06,800 --> 00:38:11,690
Let's just use this where we will develop a theory of this properly next term.

328
00:38:11,900 --> 00:38:16,700
But I want to use this as an example of a complete set of amplitudes and what it enables you to do.

329
00:38:19,340 --> 00:38:29,570
Okay. So the total angular momentum of these particles is always the same.

330
00:38:29,590 --> 00:38:36,670
They spin at a certain rate so that they have an angle momentum that's root three quarters of h bar where each bar is Planck's constant over two pi.

331
00:38:37,390 --> 00:38:42,219
So that's the amount of that's the amount of spin they have and they just have that spin and you can never change it.

332
00:38:42,220 --> 00:38:48,190
It's always the same. But what does happen is that this the direction that this angular momentum points in changes.

333
00:38:49,030 --> 00:38:56,889
So whereas the total angular momentum is this the Anglo mentum in some particular direction, for example,

334
00:38:56,890 --> 00:39:06,190
the Z direction, if you measure it, it turns out that you can only get two answers plus or minus a half of each part.

335
00:39:08,230 --> 00:39:16,280
So. And and moreover, there is an amplitude.

336
00:39:16,280 --> 00:39:20,100
A plus is the.

337
00:39:20,120 --> 00:39:21,800
So let this be the amplitude.

338
00:39:27,270 --> 00:39:43,080
Two measure Jay-Z equals plus a half H bar, and obviously a minus will be the amplitude to measure that Jay-Z is minus the half edge bar.

339
00:39:44,670 --> 00:39:50,190
Now, in an ordinary talk, what we say is what everybody says.

340
00:39:50,190 --> 00:39:52,650
And I will. You'll find me saying this, but it's immoral. I shouldn't.

341
00:39:53,010 --> 00:40:00,750
Is that if Jay-Z is plus a half edge bar, its spin is pointing upwards and you imagine it to be a little particle doing upwards.

342
00:40:01,230 --> 00:40:04,440
And when Jay-Z is minus one half bar, you say it's pointing downward.

343
00:40:04,440 --> 00:40:15,599
So this is a fundamental mistake because if you square, uh, a half h bar, you take the square root, you don't get that right.

344
00:40:15,600 --> 00:40:20,520
This three indicates that actually this particle has a quarter of a bar.

345
00:40:20,940 --> 00:40:25,170
Sorry, there's a half bar associated with the X and Y directions as well.

346
00:40:29,320 --> 00:40:35,830
So it's actually not a good idea to think of it as spin up as being having to spin, pointing upwards.

347
00:40:35,830 --> 00:40:39,639
The most that we can say is that really it's pointing sort of not downwards.

348
00:40:39,640 --> 00:40:43,110
It's pointing vaguely up and this one is pointing vaguely down.

349
00:40:43,120 --> 00:40:48,790
I don't really know which way it is in the X Y plane. So that's just a little a little word of caution.

350
00:40:49,060 --> 00:40:54,280
People get themselves into a real tangle by imagining that this means the spin is up and that means the spin is done.

351
00:40:54,310 --> 00:40:57,400
We all say that, and you'll find me saying that.

352
00:40:57,670 --> 00:41:03,549
But but just when you find yourself saying that, just have a little trip in the brain which says, hang on a moment,

353
00:41:03,550 --> 00:41:07,480
I mustn't take that too literally, because it does have angular momentum in the X and Y directions.

354
00:41:07,780 --> 00:41:12,820
Even though I've measured Jay Z and counted up Jay Z or Jay Z and I found it down.

355
00:41:13,660 --> 00:41:22,110
Okay, so the good news is that the set a plus, comma, a minus is a complete set of amplitudes.

356
00:41:22,710 --> 00:41:27,610
So what do I mean by that?

357
00:41:27,610 --> 00:41:34,120
What that means is, if I know those two complex numbers, if I know both those two complex numbers,

358
00:41:34,480 --> 00:41:42,639
I can calculate the amplitude and therefore the probability to find the particle with its spin in any direction that

359
00:41:42,640 --> 00:41:51,310
I want that you specify is either plus a half h bar in that direction or minus a half H bar in that direction.

360
00:41:57,870 --> 00:42:06,030
And we'll work that out in some detail. Yeah.

361
00:42:06,090 --> 00:42:09,390
So. So from these, we will.

362
00:42:10,470 --> 00:42:17,510
Maybe. Maybe I want to write the formula down. I'm not sure I went with the notes.

363
00:42:24,940 --> 00:42:27,220
No, I don't think we do yet. We're not ready to write that down.

364
00:42:27,820 --> 00:42:41,380
We just want to make that statement that that it's a complete set of approaches in the sense that we will derive rules such that we can calculate.

365
00:42:49,590 --> 00:42:57,990
B plus, which is a function of a plus and minus, which is the and this is the amplitude.

366
00:43:07,670 --> 00:43:14,210
To measure j in some direction theatre to be.

367
00:43:20,350 --> 00:43:25,120
And the theory consists. So what what the theory of quantum mechanics is about?

368
00:43:25,120 --> 00:43:32,520
It's about finding the rules which enable you to calculate the amplitude for an event that you, you know,

369
00:43:32,530 --> 00:43:39,040
somebody is you want to know what's the probability of something happening given your current state of information,

370
00:43:39,040 --> 00:43:43,540
which is a complete set of amplitudes, down to a complete set of amplitude for something else to happen?

371
00:43:43,840 --> 00:43:52,780
That's what the apparatus consists of and it's there to do. So I think that it probably is an appropriate moment to stop because the next section, uh.

372
00:43:56,410 --> 00:44:00,370
Requires a bit of space between which we shouldn't take.

373
00:44:00,370 --> 00:44:00,760
No.