1 00:00:00,180 --> 00:00:07,590 Ladies and gentlemen, I can detect the kind of expectant hush, so although it's not quite 5:15 yet. 2 00:00:07,590 --> 00:00:14,850 Let me do my warm up act by introducing the speaker and also saying something about this occasion. 3 00:00:14,850 --> 00:00:19,680 The best one lecture given every year, by the way, for newcomers, there are seats down here. 4 00:00:19,680 --> 00:00:29,820 The front, please don't be shy. The best one lecture is the high point of the year for the Best Will Centre for the Enlightenment 5 00:00:29,820 --> 00:00:35,940 that was founded as an offshoot of the Voltaire Foundation some years ago by Nicholas KROQ. 6 00:00:35,940 --> 00:00:43,440 It's now been absorbed into the torch programme on the Enlightenment torch, 7 00:00:43,440 --> 00:00:50,130 as also will know is the acronym for the Oxford Centre for Research in the Humanities. 8 00:00:50,130 --> 00:00:57,240 The Oxford counterpart to crash in Cambridge there was some dispute, as with a torch, 9 00:00:57,240 --> 00:01:02,430 was entirely appropriate name because some people associated with the act of torching. 10 00:01:02,430 --> 00:01:10,890 But we thought that the sense of torch light enlightenment was far, far superior. 11 00:01:10,890 --> 00:01:21,240 The Vestibule Decimal Centre, also in this new guise, is reaching out much more than in the past beyond France to the international enlightenment. 12 00:01:21,240 --> 00:01:29,700 And one side of this extension of our mission is we've invited a scholar of the German Enlightenment, 13 00:01:29,700 --> 00:01:35,510 Professor Andrew Willy from Cambridge to give this year's lecture. 14 00:01:35,510 --> 00:01:50,870 Drew Willy is professor of German history and thought at Cambridge and a fellow of his college, he began with a book about toleration in Hamburg. 15 00:01:50,870 --> 00:01:56,420 From 15, 29 to 18, 19, the book soon afterwards appeared in German. 16 00:01:56,420 --> 00:01:58,970 He's published many first-rate articles, 17 00:01:58,970 --> 00:02:04,970 but one of the most remarkable things about him is that he's one of the rare academics who can hold their nerve 18 00:02:04,970 --> 00:02:12,020 and work for many years on a massive research project without worrying about the demands of excessive ease, 19 00:02:12,020 --> 00:02:17,870 the RDF, which provides plenty material in the form of first rate articles. 20 00:02:17,870 --> 00:02:31,460 Anyway, the book in question is Germany and the Holy Roman Empire 50 493 2006 two volumes total of some fourteen hundred pages, 21 00:02:31,460 --> 00:02:41,220 which appear from up in 2012 as part of the Oxford history of early modern Europe. 22 00:02:41,220 --> 00:02:45,360 There are many books commissioned for Caesar that don't get finished. 23 00:02:45,360 --> 00:02:51,390 This one has been finished. It's available in paperback. And if you wish, you can buy. 24 00:02:51,390 --> 00:03:00,360 The German translation was published two months ago. And apparently the first printing is already sold out. 25 00:03:00,360 --> 00:03:08,880 Has these projects on hand now, one of which is the volume in Europe's very short introduction series on the Holy Roman Empire. 26 00:03:08,880 --> 00:03:15,630 But today he's going to speak to us on the theme of true enlightenment can be both achieved and beneficial. 27 00:03:15,630 --> 00:03:27,160 The German enlightenment and its interpretation to. 28 00:03:27,160 --> 00:03:32,320 Thank you, Richard, for those very kind words of introduction, thank you also to you again, 29 00:03:32,320 --> 00:03:37,990 Richie and Nicholas Cronk and his colleagues for having firstly invited me in for 30 00:03:37,990 --> 00:03:47,200 having made the arrangements for my stay in Cambridge really so smooth and agreeable. 31 00:03:47,200 --> 00:03:55,360 Of Cleveland can at once the concise and true enlightenment can be both achieved and beneficial, 32 00:03:55,360 --> 00:04:00,370 or perhaps to use more colloquial sounding but actually quite appropriate 18th century terminology. 33 00:04:00,370 --> 00:04:04,120 True enlightenment can be achieved and make us happy. 34 00:04:04,120 --> 00:04:10,000 One could be forgiven for thinking that my title was taken from one of those numerous 18th century essays by German writers, 35 00:04:10,000 --> 00:04:19,810 associate with the oft claim that later critics denounced as typically facile thoughts of a superficial and hopelessly idealistic movement. 36 00:04:19,810 --> 00:04:25,330 It is, however, nothing of the kind the statement can be found in the 11th edition of the podcast. 37 00:04:25,330 --> 00:04:30,370 Encyclopaedia, published in 1860 for one of the key handbooks of the German building, 38 00:04:30,370 --> 00:04:35,140 spoke to the equivalent in many ways of the Encyclopaedia Britannica. 39 00:04:35,140 --> 00:04:42,610 To find such an affirmation of the Enlightenment and a key German publication of this time is in fact rather surprising. 40 00:04:42,610 --> 00:04:45,130 It's not so much that it's the exception to the rule. 41 00:04:45,130 --> 00:04:53,530 On the contrary, similar statements may be found throughout the 19th century and into the first decades of the 20th century. 42 00:04:53,530 --> 00:05:02,050 What is remarkable, however, is that such statements don't fit into the commonly accepted interpretation of the German Enlightenment and its legacy 43 00:05:02,050 --> 00:05:08,260 for the story that emerges for much of the scholarly literature of the 19th century to the present is rather different. 44 00:05:08,260 --> 00:05:12,610 The German Enlightenment is said, died in the 1790s. 45 00:05:12,610 --> 00:05:21,520 What followed was an allegedly an increasingly radical series of reactions to it and rejections of its fundamental principles and values. 46 00:05:21,520 --> 00:05:27,790 Attempts to arrive revive its ideals, for example, in the 1920s for short lived. 47 00:05:27,790 --> 00:05:34,390 Even after 1945, it was often suggested and is still suggested today that those who wish to try once more to 48 00:05:34,390 --> 00:05:40,270 connect with the ideals of the 18th century struggled at least initially against the tide. 49 00:05:40,270 --> 00:05:45,760 Then a Schneiders, for example, considered by many to be the leading German modern German scholar of Enlightenment 50 00:05:45,760 --> 00:05:52,030 Thought argues that the oft claim effectively ended in the 1780s and that thereafter, 51 00:05:52,030 --> 00:05:59,500 as he wrote. The fact that Germany too had been a country of the Enlightenment was forgotten for a very long time. 52 00:05:59,500 --> 00:06:05,110 Frederic Vizer went even further when he wrote in 1992 that the attack on the old 53 00:06:05,110 --> 00:06:11,560 club in the 1790s cast a shadow over Germany's future to not a negligible degree. 54 00:06:11,560 --> 00:06:16,360 The shadow remains. I shall return to this dark narrative in a minute, 55 00:06:16,360 --> 00:06:23,260 but first I'd like to address some key issues that preoccupied Enlightenment scholarship generally in recent years. 56 00:06:23,260 --> 00:06:30,160 Speaking of a German enlightenment and of a specifically German interpretation of the Enlightenment brings to mind 57 00:06:30,160 --> 00:06:36,280 the debate provoked by the arguments developed by Jonathan Israel in a series of three massive volumes so far, 58 00:06:36,280 --> 00:06:41,290 totalling over three thousand pages in print. And in addition, his book On The French Revolution. 59 00:06:41,290 --> 00:06:47,290 Numerous articles, reviews and savage and polemical responses to his critics. 60 00:06:47,290 --> 00:06:52,780 He's not here. The debate about this body of work has become so important, however, 61 00:06:52,780 --> 00:06:59,260 that I believe no serious discussion of the Enlightenment can now take place without clear reference to it. 62 00:06:59,260 --> 00:07:02,350 The essence of Israel's argument is easily stated. 63 00:07:02,350 --> 00:07:10,030 He suggests that the late 17th and 18th century saw the development of what one might describe as a unitary enlightenment. 64 00:07:10,030 --> 00:07:15,340 It was founded on the radical new interpretation of God and the world by Spinoza. 65 00:07:15,340 --> 00:07:18,580 The key, according to Israel, was Spinoza modernism. 66 00:07:18,580 --> 00:07:25,510 His rejection of any difference between matter and spirit, which led to a rejection of any kind of hierarchy at all. 67 00:07:25,510 --> 00:07:32,800 Originally developed in the religious context, this notion was rapidly applied more widely in politics and society as well. 68 00:07:32,800 --> 00:07:41,350 Over time, it fostered the development of a clear-cut set of convictions or objectives secularist and tolerant without reservation. 69 00:07:41,350 --> 00:07:49,240 Also egalitarian and democratic. Furthermore, anti-colonial and in favour of sexual emancipation. 70 00:07:49,240 --> 00:07:55,990 Some critics have described this as a package, but I think from the outset Israel has been clear that he believes these ideas developed 71 00:07:55,990 --> 00:08:02,800 progressively and that they were not fully formed until the middle decades of the 18th century. 72 00:08:02,800 --> 00:08:11,470 His emphasis on the core on a core of Enlightenment ideas does not narrow his focus as much as some critics have claimed. 73 00:08:11,470 --> 00:08:16,240 Rather, it provides him with a distinctive is highly controversial organising tool. 74 00:08:16,240 --> 00:08:25,120 The Democratic egalitarian Republican impulses that Israel identifies as the core were espoused by what he calls the radical enlightenment. 75 00:08:25,120 --> 00:08:28,840 From the 16 sixties, however, and into the early 19th century, 76 00:08:28,840 --> 00:08:34,540 there were two other parallel ideological camps the conservative enlightenment of thinkers such as Locke, 77 00:08:34,540 --> 00:08:40,420 Voltaire, Montesquieu, on the one hand and the counter enlightenment on the other. 78 00:08:40,420 --> 00:08:46,300 The former sought accommodation and compromise to harmonise religion with science to reform monarchy. 79 00:08:46,300 --> 00:08:54,700 The latter obviously sought to expose the alleged fallacies and harmfulness of the Enlightenment, especially the radical enlightenment. 80 00:08:54,700 --> 00:09:05,020 This view of a movement that spawned two parallel and opposing deformations enables Israel to insist that there was really only one enlightenment. 81 00:09:05,020 --> 00:09:10,840 He is adamant that there was no such thing as what has been variously described as a cluster of multiple enlightenment, 82 00:09:10,840 --> 00:09:20,650 a family of parallel enlightenment or a series of parallel national enlightenment or enlightenment in different national contexts. 83 00:09:20,650 --> 00:09:27,550 Equally, Israel rejects the views of those who argue that the British Enlightenment was the true source of these ideas. 84 00:09:27,550 --> 00:09:31,540 British society insists on enlightenment thinking which evolved within it, 85 00:09:31,540 --> 00:09:36,790 moved progressively away from the core values over the 18th century towards what it 86 00:09:36,790 --> 00:09:42,010 describes as a socially conservative attitude and a strident insistence on limited monarchy, 87 00:09:42,010 --> 00:09:49,420 aristocracy, racial hierarchy and empire. Israel's narrative takes a different geographical course. 88 00:09:49,420 --> 00:09:54,190 The radical enlightenment enhanced almost immediately its moderate and critical 89 00:09:54,190 --> 00:09:59,260 or antagonistic variants began in the low countries and then spread to France, 90 00:09:59,260 --> 00:10:04,750 which was the main arena within which the radical enlightenment then subsequently developed. 91 00:10:04,750 --> 00:10:10,480 Ultimately argues this strand of thought caused the revolution or rather its later exponents 92 00:10:10,480 --> 00:10:16,900 dominated the Democratic and Republican phase of the revolution between 1789 and 1799, 93 00:10:16,900 --> 00:10:23,110 following the collapse of royal aristocratic and ecclesiastical power and at a time while conservatism, 94 00:10:23,110 --> 00:10:30,460 moderation and authoritarian populism populism all fragmented and weakened each other. 95 00:10:30,460 --> 00:10:39,070 Implicit in that last quotation is Israel's view that Robespierre and his colleagues were not exponents really of radical enlightenment, 96 00:10:39,070 --> 00:10:46,120 but part of what he describes as a populist authoritarian revolution rooted in a simplified culture enlightenment, 97 00:10:46,120 --> 00:10:54,700 Rousseau ism aiming at dictatorship, distinguished extinguishing dissent and suppressing freedom of the press and expression. 98 00:10:54,700 --> 00:10:58,480 This is an important point because Israel clearly wishes to present pre-empt 99 00:10:58,480 --> 00:11:02,530 any argument that there was a relationship between the Enlightenment and 20th 100 00:11:02,530 --> 00:11:06,880 century totalitarianism for this would conflict with his own central point that 101 00:11:06,880 --> 00:11:11,110 the core values of the radical enlightenment form the foundation of modern. 102 00:11:11,110 --> 00:11:16,120 Perhaps we should specify modern Western society today. 103 00:11:16,120 --> 00:11:23,200 I don't want to dwell on this particular issue, but to move on to ask what all this means in Israel's view for Germany. 104 00:11:23,200 --> 00:11:30,910 Israel repeatedly emphasises the constrictions of German society and the conservative structures of the Holy Roman Empire. 105 00:11:30,910 --> 00:11:38,650 He's sceptical, indeed scathing about the claims made for enlightened despotism, particularly in the larger territories such as Austria and Prussia. 106 00:11:38,650 --> 00:11:44,470 There was more scope, he says, for intellectual freedom and enlightenment reform in smaller territories, but not much. 107 00:11:44,470 --> 00:11:55,660 In most cases, German thinkers nonetheless feature at every stage in Israel's analysis from the late 17th century to the 1790s over his three volumes, 108 00:11:55,660 --> 00:12:06,730 which cover so far the period up to 1790. Israel sketches and then allowed an outline of the development of German radical thought before about 1740. 109 00:12:06,730 --> 00:12:14,170 This includes many lesser known now partly forgotten figures, but thereafter the focus shifts to a marvellous Lessing Kant, 110 00:12:14,170 --> 00:12:21,130 How to Ghouta and Anshula, as well as people like pulpwood, which thought Adam Vice. helped and others. 111 00:12:21,130 --> 00:12:30,010 Variously, they contributed to what Israel calls the fracturing German culture and inspired or participated in key debates in the later 112 00:12:30,010 --> 00:12:38,170 1780s about the legacy of Spinoza and the significance of Kant's critical philosophy and discussion of the revolution, 113 00:12:38,170 --> 00:12:44,710 then prompted to go to Chilla to develop their doctrine of art as the new religion. 114 00:12:44,710 --> 00:12:52,120 Of course, we don't exactly know where Israel would take his argument next or how exactly he would conclude his fourth, 115 00:12:52,120 --> 00:13:00,130 and one would assume final volume is still in progress, but it's difficult to see how he can develop his German strand very far. 116 00:13:00,130 --> 00:13:06,780 Heiner and Marx will no doubt figure, and Hegel, of course, was the last gasp of moderate enlightenment in Germany. 117 00:13:06,780 --> 00:13:09,010 But who else? In fact, 118 00:13:09,010 --> 00:13:17,530 Israel seems already to have written Germany into a version of the German zonder vague thesis the school of Post-1945 Historical thought 119 00:13:17,530 --> 00:13:24,680 that sought to explain the deep roots of national socialism in German history in terms of the absence of a radical or liberal to. 120 00:13:24,680 --> 00:13:33,860 Ed. Germany, these historians argued, was a country without revolution where intellectuals devoted themselves to art rather than 121 00:13:33,860 --> 00:13:41,570 politics for subscribing to a new religion of art was clearly a way of avoiding revolution. 122 00:13:41,570 --> 00:13:45,620 German revolutionaries or perhaps one should say putative revolutionaries, 123 00:13:45,620 --> 00:13:54,800 were thin on the ground and none came anywhere near to achieving anything other than provoking censorship or other forms of government clampdown. 124 00:13:54,800 --> 00:14:01,550 It seems to me in two respects that Israel has produced something that is set out to avoid, 125 00:14:01,550 --> 00:14:10,100 despite his aspiration to write a transnational history of the Enlightenment and to avoid the old national narratives of the history of that movement. 126 00:14:10,100 --> 00:14:21,140 He's come up with something remarkably similar, particularly in the third volume of which is devoted to the Democratic Enlightenment 1750 to 1790. 127 00:14:21,140 --> 00:14:27,170 It's true that this volume also includes sections devoted to all European countries covers North America, 128 00:14:27,170 --> 00:14:33,350 Iberia, America, Batavia, Dutch Asia, India, China and Japan as well. 129 00:14:33,350 --> 00:14:39,740 But the real core of his history is the story of France, culminating in the revolution. 130 00:14:39,740 --> 00:14:49,310 And the second strand of the narrative is clearly Germany, to which over just over 20 percent of the third volume is devoted. 131 00:14:49,310 --> 00:14:57,320 Now, like any good historian, Israel is sensitive to the contingencies of time, place, institutional framework and tradition. 132 00:14:57,320 --> 00:15:03,770 What he demonstrates, I think at every stage, is how such contingencies shaped, facilitated, transformed, impeded, 133 00:15:03,770 --> 00:15:08,780 hindered or defeated the development of enlightenment ideas in various parts of 134 00:15:08,780 --> 00:15:13,790 the world that Israel privileges one particular set of ideals is another matter. 135 00:15:13,790 --> 00:15:18,320 He's still operating, however, with something that he claimed was obsolete, 136 00:15:18,320 --> 00:15:25,820 namely a model of parallel contexts, which we can, I believe, loosely label national. 137 00:15:25,820 --> 00:15:28,370 If we look at the argument of Israel's third volume, 138 00:15:28,370 --> 00:15:37,040 what we have in some ways is simply a new version of the classic tale of two enlightenment a progressive French enlightenment, 139 00:15:37,040 --> 00:15:43,850 albeit now with Dutch roots and the German Enlightenment, albeit now with a radical core, which, however, 140 00:15:43,850 --> 00:15:52,150 shied away from the revolutionary challenge in the 1780s and 1790s and then soon afterwards failed. 141 00:15:52,150 --> 00:15:57,280 Here Israel comes close to the traditional master narrative of the German Enlightenment, 142 00:15:57,280 --> 00:16:03,700 as it was written by German scholars from the late 19th century to the 1960s and as it in many respects, 143 00:16:03,700 --> 00:16:08,470 still characterises the view of leading German scholars. 144 00:16:08,470 --> 00:16:17,350 It's important to note, of course, that Israel's account has a different content, but the structural similarity is very striking. 145 00:16:17,350 --> 00:16:21,460 The old German narrative ran roughly as follows. 146 00:16:21,460 --> 00:16:26,650 It started with with the disparaging remarks that Hagel made about the Berlin 147 00:16:26,650 --> 00:16:32,800 Wall around 18:00 and in his later lectures and the history of philosophy, 148 00:16:32,800 --> 00:16:40,780 the works of mid-19th century scholars such as Karl Biederman and Hermann Hetzner, who championed Enlightenment values were rarely appreciated. 149 00:16:40,780 --> 00:16:49,090 More typical, it was said, were those who from the 1880s onwards echoed Hegel in writing about the oft claim as a superficial, 150 00:16:49,090 --> 00:16:53,560 shallow movement inspired by ideas imported from France. 151 00:16:53,560 --> 00:16:58,900 It was, they concluded, a fundamentally unknown German movement. 152 00:16:58,900 --> 00:17:07,420 Indeed, the greatest achievement of German thought and culture was such a thing that it overcame or transcended the alpha male. 153 00:17:07,420 --> 00:17:13,060 This narrative never truly necessitated certain organisation of the material. 154 00:17:13,060 --> 00:17:18,160 Likeness, for example, was deemed not to belong to the clell at all in any sense. 155 00:17:18,160 --> 00:17:23,830 More curiously, even Kant was also separated out and labelled as the founder of German idealism. 156 00:17:23,830 --> 00:17:30,580 The philosophical movement, which culminated in the work of fish to Schlegel, Hegel and Schelling, 157 00:17:30,580 --> 00:17:41,770 in which allegedly represented an anti-Western anti rational and uniquely German way of understanding the world in literature and historical thinking. 158 00:17:41,770 --> 00:17:50,350 There was a parallel movement. The reaction against enlightenment began. If anything, slightly earlier before the 1880s here Hamon, for example, 159 00:17:50,350 --> 00:17:59,200 and how to were identified as progenitors of what Wilhelm Deltoid identified in his 1867 inaugural lecture, 160 00:17:59,200 --> 00:18:05,350 as did Deutsche the vehicle three generations of innovative German writers and thinkers, 161 00:18:05,350 --> 00:18:12,880 starting with the storm and drunk in the 1770s and reaching a high point with Schiller and the mature Gerta. 162 00:18:12,880 --> 00:18:19,930 If idealism was a philosophical reflection or manifestation of the German spirit, classicism and above all, 163 00:18:19,930 --> 00:18:27,490 romanticism were its literary and artistic expressions by about nineteen hundred thousand. 164 00:18:27,490 --> 00:18:33,880 Once observed, the of Cleveland had become the whipping boy of German Geist Schuster. 165 00:18:33,880 --> 00:18:43,720 Indeed, from around that time, the word of Klong itself was increasingly used to denote an historical epoch rather than an ongoing process. 166 00:18:43,720 --> 00:18:47,410 It was consigned firmly to the past. 167 00:18:47,410 --> 00:18:52,120 The myth of the Deutsche Vivegam became an established orthodoxy, 168 00:18:52,120 --> 00:19:00,010 and it was given further force by Freud was my next notion at the end of the 19th that at the end of the 18th century, sorry minor CXOs. 169 00:19:00,010 --> 00:19:06,370 At the end of the 18th century, the Germans were a couture nazione, but not yet a start. 170 00:19:06,370 --> 00:19:15,760 Not saw this, he said. Both explained the late development of the Germans, but also the ultimate superiority. 171 00:19:15,760 --> 00:19:20,800 Their mindset had developed slowly. But in working through and overcoming the Enlightenment, 172 00:19:20,800 --> 00:19:27,040 the Germans had achieved a greater depth of profundity than the rest of the world put together. 173 00:19:27,040 --> 00:19:36,280 This mindset, it was said, triumphed militarily and politically in the so-called wars of liberation against France between 1813 and 1815, 174 00:19:36,280 --> 00:19:41,740 a triumph which demonstrated what great things might be achieved in the future. 175 00:19:41,740 --> 00:19:42,760 Within a few years, 176 00:19:42,760 --> 00:19:51,460 these ideas became the emblematic became emblematic of national solidarity with the German calls in the First World War and the basis 177 00:19:51,460 --> 00:20:00,430 for rejection both of the peace settlement of 1919 and of the Republican system that was allegedly imposed upon Germany by it. 178 00:20:00,430 --> 00:20:09,700 Few establishment intellectuals, notably those who held shares of humanistic history, philosophy, theology at German universities, deviated from them. 179 00:20:09,700 --> 00:20:15,550 There were notable survivals from an older generation like Koch, for example, and others from Hanoch, 180 00:20:15,550 --> 00:20:23,380 whose influential works, largely written before 1914, still reiterated the continuing significance of the all clear. 181 00:20:23,380 --> 00:20:26,950 Yet amongst younger scholars, figures such as Kalapana, 182 00:20:26,950 --> 00:20:34,330 the sociologist Ounce Mannheim or the philosopher Ernst Cachoeira were marginal or marginalised figures. 183 00:20:34,330 --> 00:20:42,400 Honour, for example, was a staunch national liberal patriot who supported the war effort yet strenuously opposed the Turkish nationalism. 184 00:20:42,400 --> 00:20:49,990 But the Pan Germans. He was, however, a pastor and gained his first university position at the age of 50. 185 00:20:49,990 --> 00:20:59,040 Furthermore, his death? In nineteen ninety thirty three, four years after the publication of his great book on the theology of The Clone 186 00:20:59,040 --> 00:21:04,590 effectively meant that his work was only rediscovered in the nineteen sixties. 187 00:21:04,590 --> 00:21:11,310 Mannheim, Hungarian German Jew, had been approved for his habilitation at the University of Leipzig, 188 00:21:11,310 --> 00:21:17,400 but in nineteen thirty three he withdrew his application and left Germany. 189 00:21:17,400 --> 00:21:23,940 Cachoeira great work on the philosophy of the club was completed in nineteen thirty two the following year. 190 00:21:23,940 --> 00:21:30,810 He was dismissed from his Hamburg professorship amongst German writers of the centre and right on the political spectrum. 191 00:21:30,810 --> 00:21:37,020 Things were little different. Thomas Mann here is a notable exception in moving from war crime, 192 00:21:37,020 --> 00:21:44,220 denunciation of the Enlightenment to a new appreciation of its values by the end of the nineteen twenties. 193 00:21:44,220 --> 00:21:48,300 More typical of what was to come was Hunt's Norman Norman Sorry, 194 00:21:48,300 --> 00:21:57,240 who wrote in 1932 that the Alf clone had afflicted the German people like an illness, that it was ultimately responsible for capitalism, 195 00:21:57,240 --> 00:22:03,810 the proletariat for Marxism and the economic worldview for overpopulation and 196 00:22:03,810 --> 00:22:09,600 the politicisation of the masses and for the domination of society by machines. 197 00:22:09,600 --> 00:22:16,770 These phenomena, he claimed, were all profoundly linked to rather mysteriously and like a hoard of apocalyptic 198 00:22:16,770 --> 00:22:23,100 horsemen who wrote they had brought the German people to the brink of catastrophe. 199 00:22:23,100 --> 00:22:30,990 Norman was an early member of the Nazi Party. Others, perhaps not surprising, others were less strident, and one should, of course, 200 00:22:30,990 --> 00:22:38,190 be wary of branding all critics of the Alf clown as proto fascists or proto Nazis as some have been inclined to do. 201 00:22:38,190 --> 00:22:48,450 Yet, disappointingly, all but a few German scholars found their views to be entirely compatible with the spirit of the New Age. 202 00:22:48,450 --> 00:22:54,060 The national socialist regime rapidly integrated the by now mainstream negative perceptions of 203 00:22:54,060 --> 00:23:00,750 the Alf clown into its own worldview and into the guidelines set for schools and universities. 204 00:23:00,750 --> 00:23:08,520 Lessing was admired for his alleged hatred of France, which allowed many Nazis to overlook his rather misguided file semitism. 205 00:23:08,520 --> 00:23:15,420 Winkleman, Kant and Schiller were also praised as cited as praiseworthy anti-French thinkers. 206 00:23:15,420 --> 00:23:24,990 Moses Mendelssohn was despised as one of the originators of the modern Jewish world Jewish intellectual conspiracy How To was reviled, 207 00:23:24,990 --> 00:23:32,670 revered as a hero for having braced himself against the degenerate intellectual character of his time. 208 00:23:32,670 --> 00:23:34,950 The natural corollary to all this was, of course, 209 00:23:34,950 --> 00:23:43,980 the view of German romanticism as the true origin of what was claimed to be the steel romanticism of the present. 210 00:23:43,980 --> 00:23:53,250 The writings of Mauritz aunt and Kleist and Gert False perhaps an unlikely trio, but nonetheless, these were the trio that were set as examples. 211 00:23:53,250 --> 00:24:01,900 These were the cultural foundations that were said and artistic foundations of the new Germany of the 1930s. 212 00:24:01,900 --> 00:24:08,720 Paradoxically, perhaps the of clock was not immediately rehabilitated following the defeat of Nazis, 213 00:24:08,720 --> 00:24:14,470 and its significance was, of course, recognised from the outset in a certain sense in East Germany. 214 00:24:14,470 --> 00:24:24,010 Here, scholars started from Marx and Engels critical insight that the Ofglen was essentially a bourgeois movement and to be criticised accordingly. 215 00:24:24,010 --> 00:24:32,050 Yet it contained within it. They said the elements of the movement that would succeed it and culminate in revolutionary transformation. 216 00:24:32,050 --> 00:24:38,380 Hence, Marxist scholars concentrated above all on exploring the tradition of pre Marxist materialism. 217 00:24:38,380 --> 00:24:44,800 In Germany, the work of people like Gottfrid Steel, akin to Mountford Secret Volga and others, 218 00:24:44,800 --> 00:24:49,690 which laid the foundations for a new interest in the German radical tradition. 219 00:24:49,690 --> 00:24:52,510 It's interesting that Johnson Israel acknowledges the work, for example, 220 00:24:52,510 --> 00:24:59,320 of Munich thought in particular as a major influence on his own work on this theme. 221 00:24:59,320 --> 00:25:05,350 The activities of East German scholars, of course, to some extent inhibited their Western counterparts. 222 00:25:05,350 --> 00:25:07,840 Certainly, all attempts made by then, of course, 223 00:25:07,840 --> 00:25:13,690 to establish a German society for 18th century studies across the Berlin Wall as it were founded both on the 224 00:25:13,690 --> 00:25:20,650 ambivalence of the GDR government and on the reluctance of West German scholars to cross the ideological divide, 225 00:25:20,650 --> 00:25:26,440 or even to engage in research on similar topics to the East German counterparts. 226 00:25:26,440 --> 00:25:31,030 Two other factors were also important. 227 00:25:31,030 --> 00:25:40,390 Firstly, there was a certainly a renewed preoccupation in West Germany with the tradition of Western humanism and the of clown featured in that, 228 00:25:40,390 --> 00:25:44,200 along with the Renaissance. So there is a revival of interest. 229 00:25:44,200 --> 00:25:51,130 But that early exploration of the roots of a better German way, often undertaken by decidedly Christian writers, 230 00:25:51,130 --> 00:25:58,720 was still by and large caught up in the old German way of thinking about the West as a land in which Germany, 231 00:25:58,720 --> 00:26:06,250 and especially the manifestations of German idealism and romanticism, occupied a special role. 232 00:26:06,250 --> 00:26:14,560 The influential Catholic writer, for example, Hindmarch Reinhold Schneider, still after 1945, 233 00:26:14,560 --> 00:26:22,240 blamed the Enlightenment values such as toleration for the loss of faith and Christian orientation. 234 00:26:22,240 --> 00:26:27,730 Schneider, who by 1948 had become known as the conscience of the nation, 235 00:26:27,730 --> 00:26:35,830 believed that Lessing and his successors had undermined Christianity by simply regarding Jesus as a teacher rather than as a saviour. 236 00:26:35,830 --> 00:26:46,060 The return of the German spirit for which Schneider hoped to pave the way was thus predicated on a rejection of the key principles of the off clell. 237 00:26:46,060 --> 00:26:48,490 Schneider's influence on Catholic Germany was immense, 238 00:26:48,490 --> 00:26:56,860 and it's perhaps not surprising that research into the Catholic of Cologne didn't really begin until the nineteen eighties. 239 00:26:56,860 --> 00:27:05,110 One could make a similar case for Protestants also shared an ambivalence about the Ofglen, at least at first, and only in the later. 240 00:27:05,110 --> 00:27:14,620 Nineteen sixties began to preoccupy themselves again with a re-evaluation of the theology of the 18th century. 241 00:27:14,620 --> 00:27:24,790 Secondly, any optimistic view of the Ofglen after 1945 now also faced major obstacles in the form of 242 00:27:24,790 --> 00:27:30,850 powerful critiques of the Enlightenment from both the left and from liberal conservatives. 243 00:27:30,850 --> 00:27:32,920 The challenge of the left is better known. 244 00:27:32,920 --> 00:27:41,350 East Germans who criticised the outcome did so in order to liberate it from its chains and thus fulfil itself by the dictates of the proletariat. 245 00:27:41,350 --> 00:27:51,130 Their Western counterparts, however, were confronted in 1947 by the deeply pessimistic critique of Adorno and Horkheimer. 246 00:27:51,130 --> 00:28:01,690 The insistence of dialectic of claim that reason necessarily turned turned into its opposite seemed to deny any way forward at all. 247 00:28:01,690 --> 00:28:11,170 Far from overcoming myths, they argue of million slave society to a new and even more pernicious mythology. 248 00:28:11,170 --> 00:28:20,020 Borrowing from Max Faber when Marx failed them, Donovan Horkheimer explained the disaster of Western society in their own lifetimes in terms of 249 00:28:20,020 --> 00:28:26,080 the paradoxical history of rationality which rested on Weber's distinction between instrumental, 250 00:28:26,080 --> 00:28:33,760 rationality and value rationality. So was instrumental reason becomes ever more efficient. 251 00:28:33,760 --> 00:28:42,190 So the reason that embodies or conveys values stifled, repressed and ultimately destroyed enlightenment, 252 00:28:42,190 --> 00:28:49,600 in other words, had been responsible for totalitarianism and hence for the disasters of the 20th century. 253 00:28:49,600 --> 00:28:53,950 Though they never spelled them out, the implications for German history were clear. 254 00:28:53,950 --> 00:29:01,130 The oft claim had led to extreme rationalisation. This would then been accompanied by the emergence of a new. 255 00:29:01,130 --> 00:29:05,900 Irrational ism first manifested in idealism and romanticism. 256 00:29:05,900 --> 00:29:12,590 The tragic denouement the destructive nadir of Deutsche Ageist was the Third Reich and the Holocaust. 257 00:29:12,590 --> 00:29:22,730 If, as it seems, Adorno and Horkheimer really did plan to write a rattling off plan out the way a rehabilitation of the Enlightenment, 258 00:29:22,730 --> 00:29:28,760 they never certainly got round to it. And there is no work that I'm aware of by either of them, 259 00:29:28,760 --> 00:29:35,150 which indicates any basis on which they might have written that because I think they were never really able to work out how, 260 00:29:35,150 --> 00:29:42,740 in fact, reason might overcome its allegedly innate destructive tendencies. 261 00:29:42,740 --> 00:29:47,990 And that left the rather unhelpful implication that since there was no possible future for the Enlightenment, 262 00:29:47,990 --> 00:29:54,350 there was really no reason to study it, except for forensic interest more or less. 263 00:29:54,350 --> 00:30:02,120 Simultaneously, the Enlightenment also came under attack from the liberal, conservative perspective. 264 00:30:02,120 --> 00:30:06,980 Thinkers such as Karl Popper and Arvind Tolman developed the notion that the 265 00:30:06,980 --> 00:30:12,680 bourgeois world was born with deep flaws that ultimately caused its destruction. 266 00:30:12,680 --> 00:30:18,830 The young Reinhardt because Alex, influential work critic on the keys were published in 1959, 267 00:30:18,830 --> 00:30:24,290 argued that the Enlightenment had developed fateful, utopian ideals. 268 00:30:24,290 --> 00:30:32,990 He suggested that the subordination of politics to the pursuit of these ideals in the late 18th century afterwards was the real cause for the 269 00:30:32,990 --> 00:30:45,110 disasters of the 20th century and of the continuing problems of a world polarised between Soviet communism and a post Enlightenment USA. 270 00:30:45,110 --> 00:30:53,060 Of course, Germany was not the only country where debates about long term effects of the Enlightenment were conducted. 271 00:30:53,060 --> 00:30:58,790 But I think nowhere did they have a greater impact on intellectuals than in Germany, particularly on the fragile, 272 00:30:58,790 --> 00:31:06,380 uncertain and politically demoralised liberal left and those Germany of the nineteen fifties non-system and the Holocaust, 273 00:31:06,380 --> 00:31:15,390 where, after all, specifically German problems. While the Cold War was also experienced more acutely in US divided Germany living in the shadows. 274 00:31:15,390 --> 00:31:23,060 So it seemed to the Soviet Union and transfixed through the nineteen fifties by the fear of another World War. 275 00:31:23,060 --> 00:31:29,420 No other people, it seemed, was so marked by the failure of the Enlightenment than the Germans. 276 00:31:29,420 --> 00:31:34,760 It's not surprising that research into the AfD failed to prosper in that kind of context. 277 00:31:34,760 --> 00:31:40,940 The old master narrative prevailed for a time of a sterile rationalist movement that German 278 00:31:40,940 --> 00:31:46,310 intellectuals had begun to reject in the seventeen seventies with the Stalin drunk. 279 00:31:46,310 --> 00:31:50,540 This only really began to change during the course of the nineteen sixties. 280 00:31:50,540 --> 00:31:56,960 Politically, one might link the change to the gradual revival of the fortunes of the Democratic Left in Germany. 281 00:31:56,960 --> 00:32:05,360 Certainly, one of the key inspirations for such research was Juergen Harbourmaster took to a vandal coat, which of 1962, 282 00:32:05,360 --> 00:32:10,310 which challenged the gloomy view which had been put forward by Adorno and Horkheimer and held 283 00:32:10,310 --> 00:32:17,000 out the possibility of redemption through of clairvoyance rather than through its rejection. 284 00:32:17,000 --> 00:32:22,700 The public sphere, half of us argued, was a project that Cantor sketched out in his writings. 285 00:32:22,700 --> 00:32:32,450 It had been subverted by the development of capitalism in the 19th century, leading to the disaster of National Socialism and the Holocaust. 286 00:32:32,450 --> 00:32:38,090 After the catastrophe and rid now of the nationalist ideology of German exceptionalism, 287 00:32:38,090 --> 00:32:49,190 Harbourmaster suggested a new generation of critical thinkers who fully embraced Western values might now be able to translate the ideal into reality. 288 00:32:49,190 --> 00:32:55,070 Mass was, in fact, but one of several who are preaching the same message at around this time. 289 00:32:55,070 --> 00:33:01,130 Others that might be mentioned with Ludwig van der Kooser, for example, looking forward to a third of class, 290 00:33:01,130 --> 00:33:09,680 as we call it, or Willie Earl Miller, who wrote in 1969 of the unbefitting to the incomplete or unfulfilled of Clell. 291 00:33:09,680 --> 00:33:18,080 That might, however, now in the present, be resumed and perhaps even completed. 292 00:33:18,080 --> 00:33:22,580 This sense of a new dawn explains much of the excitement and growing confidence 293 00:33:22,580 --> 00:33:29,390 of a rapidly developing boom of Clelland research in the nineteen sixties. 294 00:33:29,390 --> 00:33:36,920 Many of those involved in that early stage of the revival of African research thought of themselves as the vanguard of a 295 00:33:36,920 --> 00:33:44,870 new of helping to lay the foundations for a truly free society in the later 20th century through the nineteen sixties, 296 00:33:44,870 --> 00:33:51,440 their endeavours were typically accompanied by a critical examination of the history of their own subject to uncover what 297 00:33:51,440 --> 00:33:59,090 they saw as the genesis of this German ideology and the ways in which the views of their predecessors had been skewed by it. 298 00:33:59,090 --> 00:34:08,700 This kind of academic. Golan Heights, Pavelka working through the past or confronting a tainted academic tradition was thought to 299 00:34:08,700 --> 00:34:15,960 be the precondition for a new and more positive approach to the ideas of the 18th century, 300 00:34:15,960 --> 00:34:23,970 and what indeed emerged gradually was in fact an entirely novel view of the of Clell Germany. 301 00:34:23,970 --> 00:34:29,700 The focus of scholarly interest moved back to what were assumed to be the French and British origins 302 00:34:29,700 --> 00:34:36,390 of the afternoon and to the middle decades of the 18th century when it achieved its greatest impact. 303 00:34:36,390 --> 00:34:41,340 Lessing was now regarded as a more significant figure than Gerta. 304 00:34:41,340 --> 00:34:47,430 There was a new emphasis on the social history of ideas of literature and a new interest in the science, 305 00:34:47,430 --> 00:34:52,980 the anthropology and the scientific ideas of the of Clement generally. 306 00:34:52,980 --> 00:35:00,600 The aim was to explore the creation of the public sphere with its journals and newspapers, its clubs and associations, 307 00:35:00,600 --> 00:35:08,370 and at the same time, there was a determination to illuminate the variety of ideas and attitudes that the Ofglen generated, 308 00:35:08,370 --> 00:35:14,310 especially the existence in Germany of a radical tradition, whether it was a materialist tendencies, 309 00:35:14,310 --> 00:35:20,670 an early 18th century or German Jacobins towards the end of the 18th century. 310 00:35:20,670 --> 00:35:26,520 In this respect, I think Jonathan is is quite right to emphasise the rediscovery of German radicalism, 311 00:35:26,520 --> 00:35:32,910 much of it inspired by Spinoza as a notable scholarly achievement of the last 50 years. 312 00:35:32,910 --> 00:35:42,030 And this, I think view has been impressively reinforced by the work of Martin Musil on intellectual history and most recently by Kevin Hilliard. 313 00:35:42,030 --> 00:35:50,070 Fine study of free thinkers liberty in some form in German literature between 1750 and 800. 314 00:35:50,070 --> 00:35:58,410 However, I think this also raises an important question. How significant was the radical tradition in practise? 315 00:35:58,410 --> 00:36:07,440 How many of the individuals whose work has been rediscovered were outsiders, misfits or marginal figures? 316 00:36:07,440 --> 00:36:15,660 The early Spinoza, for example, Tilda Ludwig Lourd, Daniel Gerlach, Victor, were unimportant in their own day. 317 00:36:15,660 --> 00:36:20,790 California was part of the founder of the Deutsche Onion was little more than a con man, 318 00:36:20,790 --> 00:36:26,610 and his Deutsche Onion was really a kind of Ponzi scheme rather than a serious, enlightened society. 319 00:36:26,610 --> 00:36:31,290 And in fact, the whole thing collapsed when the fraud was recognised. 320 00:36:31,290 --> 00:36:39,810 The German Jacobins were a small minority who made no real difference, and none of them came anywhere near achieving their ambitions. 321 00:36:39,810 --> 00:36:48,030 How much of the free thinking in literary and philosophical circles rarely translated into wider attitudes? 322 00:36:48,030 --> 00:36:53,520 The attention paid to radicalism, I believe, underlines really a rather different point. 323 00:36:53,520 --> 00:36:58,590 The mainstream in Germany inclined in a more moderate direction. 324 00:36:58,590 --> 00:37:04,500 And if there was a central text that caught the mood of the afterglow in Germany, it was your hand off him. 325 00:37:04,500 --> 00:37:14,010 Spalding's but you would demand this mention of six 48, which went through over 40 editions by the time of the author's death. 326 00:37:14,010 --> 00:37:20,130 In Eighteen hundred and forty thoughts on the destiny of man or the determination of man, 327 00:37:20,130 --> 00:37:27,060 spalding's objective was to defend the reputation of Shaftesbury against accusations of theirs. 328 00:37:27,060 --> 00:37:31,680 His assertion that original sin did not preclude man from perfecting himself. 329 00:37:31,680 --> 00:37:40,950 Appalled Orthodox Lutherans who accused him of plagiarism. But his emphasis on the moral core of religion delighted more progressive Lutherans. 330 00:37:40,950 --> 00:37:50,580 And before long, his concept was transferred from its original theological context to the broader discourse on moral philosophy and to the note and 331 00:37:50,580 --> 00:38:00,330 the notion of boosting the notion of determination or destiny was transferred from the individual Christians to mankind as a whole. 332 00:38:00,330 --> 00:38:06,690 Spalding's stimming led in many directions and proved to be as congenial to those who remained loyal to some 333 00:38:06,690 --> 00:38:13,500 form of established Protestantism as to those who distanced themselves from any form of organised religion. 334 00:38:13,500 --> 00:38:21,270 Towards the end of his life, for example, Spalding even became an admirer of current and revised his text to take account of Kent's teachings. 335 00:38:21,270 --> 00:38:28,650 Mendelssohn and Howdo were amongst many who adjusted their own ideas to take account of spalding's ideas. 336 00:38:28,650 --> 00:38:35,220 What united all of these individuals and tendencies and the tendencies they represented was a commitment to gradualism, 337 00:38:35,220 --> 00:38:41,340 to a process that might reach its conclusion in generations, even centuries to come. 338 00:38:41,340 --> 00:38:46,890 In concrete terms, this almost invariably translated into an aversion to revolution, 339 00:38:46,890 --> 00:38:52,710 into a desire to work with and through the interesting institutions of government. 340 00:38:52,710 --> 00:39:00,650 In 1789 and after, predictably, most German writers were at pains to explain that Germany did not need. 341 00:39:00,650 --> 00:39:07,700 A revolution to achieve the liberation that the French people were currently seeking through their uprising. 342 00:39:07,700 --> 00:39:13,700 The French needed to act in this way because their government was corrupt and oppressive and cannot famously 343 00:39:13,700 --> 00:39:20,150 noted in a famously noted in 1798 that despite all the horrors that unfolded in Paris over the previous years, 344 00:39:20,150 --> 00:39:27,380 it was on the one hand, only human that indeed proof of human that humans have a moral sensibility that one should have 345 00:39:27,380 --> 00:39:33,590 been excited by the revolution and to have been an enthusiastic observer of its progress progress. 346 00:39:33,590 --> 00:39:40,460 But that didn't mean to say that one should have wanted to have the same process in Germany because it simply wasn't necessary. 347 00:39:40,460 --> 00:39:48,080 In Jonathan Israel scheme of things, of course, this all counts as moderate or conservative enlightenment, not enlightenment at all. 348 00:39:48,080 --> 00:39:53,480 And he would not be the first to criticise the all clear for their lack of courage and radicalism. 349 00:39:53,480 --> 00:39:59,570 Indeed, this very much reflects the attitudes of German of scholarship since the 1960s. 350 00:39:59,570 --> 00:40:02,750 The impression often has been given of rather isolated, 351 00:40:02,750 --> 00:40:11,000 impotent figures living in an oppressive environment where original critical thought was more often than not repressed by tyrannical princes. 352 00:40:11,000 --> 00:40:21,770 The New Society of the All of which the off-colour dreamed was a society of the future that late 18th century thinkers constructed imaginatively. 353 00:40:21,770 --> 00:40:25,400 But that did not, in fact, yet exist. 354 00:40:25,400 --> 00:40:33,650 It seemed self-evident to many scholars that it could not have been realised within the Holy Roman Empire and its territories. 355 00:40:33,650 --> 00:40:42,950 This image of a rather disembodied of claim that somehow aspired to create something new but which tragically remained at the mercy of the old world, 356 00:40:42,950 --> 00:40:50,340 is, however, rather misleading. It's easy, of course, to cite examples that seem to reinforce the idea. 357 00:40:50,340 --> 00:40:51,560 There's no doubt, for example, 358 00:40:51,560 --> 00:40:58,700 that Lessing fell fall foul of the Duke upon strike or that drew cult icon averted Birkin incarcerated poor Christian Daniel 359 00:40:58,700 --> 00:41:06,830 Schubert without trial for ten years on the and aspect took that for daring to lampoon his tyrannical style of government. 360 00:41:06,830 --> 00:41:12,200 But these were the exceptions. Many more have to be careful about censorship. 361 00:41:12,200 --> 00:41:19,190 But of course, that was true of other parts of Europe as well. No country was free of censorship in the 18th century. 362 00:41:19,190 --> 00:41:30,030 New work, however, on the Holy Roman Empire over the last few decades has, I think, done a great deal to put the of Clell into new perspective. 363 00:41:30,030 --> 00:41:35,810 It's also further reinforced the idea that there was a distinctive German national 364 00:41:35,810 --> 00:41:41,390 variant of the Enlightenment and the following points I think would be central in that. 365 00:41:41,390 --> 00:41:49,340 Firstly, much writing about the Holy Roman Empire has been too influenced by the view that its demise was inevitable 366 00:41:49,340 --> 00:41:57,770 and by often cited 19th and early 20th century Christians with the supposedly decrepit and mediaeval right. 367 00:41:57,770 --> 00:42:06,560 This, however, ignores the developments in the 18th century of an enlightened theory of the Holy Roman Empire by the 1760s. 368 00:42:06,560 --> 00:42:10,790 For example, Johann Stephanie Cutter, the leading legal theorist of his day, 369 00:42:10,790 --> 00:42:16,100 was propounded the notion that the lie was a polity composed of numerous particular states, 370 00:42:16,100 --> 00:42:21,470 which, however together again, former state, a kind of idea of federation, 371 00:42:21,470 --> 00:42:30,530 a kind of unique two tier system of government which so fascinated many outside observers that even someone like Benjamin Franklin, for example, 372 00:42:30,530 --> 00:42:44,840 thinking about the future of the American colonies, went to visit Peter in 1766 and took extensive notes on Peter's ideas about the Holy Roman Empire. 373 00:42:44,840 --> 00:42:53,390 Peter's ideas became widely accepted, and there even reflected in comments made by some radical, enlightened critics. 374 00:42:53,390 --> 00:43:02,660 For example, Johann Caspar respeC, who in the 1780s published a series of letters supposedly written by a Frenchman about the 375 00:43:02,660 --> 00:43:09,050 current state of Germany and as a great surprise to find here that in one of the early letters, 376 00:43:09,050 --> 00:43:19,640 he praises the Holy Roman Empire as a system comprising many free states which have combined themselves into a certain system characterised by order, 377 00:43:19,640 --> 00:43:24,080 wisdom and caution. The empire only seemed odd. 378 00:43:24,080 --> 00:43:32,780 Please, Speck wrote. If I made the mistake of regarding it as a unitary state, which was to misunderstand the very nature of the system, 379 00:43:32,780 --> 00:43:38,600 the best thing about it, he said, was its built in safeguard against imperial tyranny. 380 00:43:38,600 --> 00:43:43,640 The principle of its in part is the division of the Reichstag into two corpora. 381 00:43:43,640 --> 00:43:51,950 In matters concerning religion, with the provision that no decision could be made, that both did not agree with this pick noted. 382 00:43:51,950 --> 00:43:56,090 Also with approval the tendency of the King of Prussia to exploit this principle 383 00:43:56,090 --> 00:44:00,700 in relation to non-religious matters because he saw this as a further safeguard. 384 00:44:00,700 --> 00:44:03,920 Against imperial tyranny on this, we should remember, 385 00:44:03,920 --> 00:44:09,730 was a man who mercilessly criticised everything that he encountered in Germany and much that he'd never actually seen himself, 386 00:44:09,730 --> 00:44:17,800 he got a lot of it out of newspapers that he saw as irrational institutions of merciless, for example, 387 00:44:17,800 --> 00:44:25,780 in denouncing monasteries as completely useless or territories which were not yet governed, according to enlightened principles. 388 00:44:25,780 --> 00:44:37,960 Here is a radical enlightenment critique approving of the Holy Roman Empire in the language of the new Enlightenment theory of the Holy Roman Empire. 389 00:44:37,960 --> 00:44:46,090 Secondly, an important theme in the extensive body of writing about the Empire was devoted to the rights of subjects. 390 00:44:46,090 --> 00:44:53,650 German freedom was variously defined, but the catalogue of fundamental rights almost always included the following religious 391 00:44:53,650 --> 00:44:59,620 liberty security of property the right to move freely from one territory to another. 392 00:44:59,620 --> 00:45:06,070 The right to appeal to the imperial courts if one's legal rights were infringed by one's ruler. 393 00:45:06,070 --> 00:45:09,760 Obviously, this didn't work so well in larger territories such as Prussia, 394 00:45:09,760 --> 00:45:14,170 which tried very hard to prevent the subjects from using the imperial courts. 395 00:45:14,170 --> 00:45:17,530 But these larger territories? This is again often overlooked, 396 00:45:17,530 --> 00:45:26,500 had been obliged to institute higher appeal courts of their own that served the same purpose from the late 17th century onwards. 397 00:45:26,500 --> 00:45:31,630 It became conventional for writers to emphasise again and again that the Germans were 398 00:45:31,630 --> 00:45:37,780 not slaves and that the freedom enjoyed by princes also pertained to the subjects. 399 00:45:37,780 --> 00:45:44,320 And in particular, the rights of German subjects were invariably extensively compared favourably to those of the 400 00:45:44,320 --> 00:45:50,690 French who really were slaves at the mercy of the tyrannical and absolute king of France. 401 00:45:50,690 --> 00:45:56,900 Thirdly, rights and everything that went with them were also no guaranteed, not only by the courts, 402 00:45:56,900 --> 00:46:04,970 but by the press and by what was referred to as the new authority of publicity it by the Enlightenment public sphere, 403 00:46:04,970 --> 00:46:10,370 which excoriated and pilloried tyrants and praised wise rulers. 404 00:46:10,370 --> 00:46:15,500 Fourthly, these principles did not remain in the world theory or in world of print. 405 00:46:15,500 --> 00:46:19,100 They were actively practised in the institutions of the Empire. 406 00:46:19,100 --> 00:46:28,130 They all, for example, reflected in the daily practise of the imperial courts, to which many thousands of subjects of the empire, in fact, did appeal. 407 00:46:28,130 --> 00:46:41,660 For example, between 1765 and 1790, just under half of the 10000 cases involving some just just under, 408 00:46:41,660 --> 00:46:50,840 there was some 10000 cases which were sent to the folks who fought in Vienna, involving roughly 8000 people of modest social origin. 409 00:46:50,840 --> 00:46:56,940 So it didn't just have to be an aristocrat or a wealthy person to appeal to these higher courts. 410 00:46:56,940 --> 00:47:06,890 And in the same period, some 7000 individuals of modest social origin were involved in cases that the other Court of Appeal placed in that slot. 411 00:47:06,890 --> 00:47:13,250 Increasingly, these institutions were populated by officials who favoured the new thinking on the same, 412 00:47:13,250 --> 00:47:17,510 I think can be said of the regional associations of territories or Kaiser, 413 00:47:17,510 --> 00:47:21,890 which in middle and southern Germany in particular developed extensive administrations 414 00:47:21,890 --> 00:47:26,090 and which increasingly formulated and implemented economic and social policy, 415 00:47:26,090 --> 00:47:32,960 often in collaboration with each other. Fifthly, far from being on the last legs, 416 00:47:32,960 --> 00:47:40,970 these institutions were flourishing in the late 18th century and there was no lack of discussion about the future. 417 00:47:40,970 --> 00:47:48,470 A recurring theme was the suggestion that the Reichstag might be transformed into an upper house to complement a new House of Commons. 418 00:47:48,470 --> 00:47:54,470 Others wanted to extend the functions of the Kaiser or to make them more truly representative of the people as well. 419 00:47:54,470 --> 00:48:03,590 Above all, thinking about these matters was more often than not historical. Rooted in the historical experience that is of the Germans, 420 00:48:03,590 --> 00:48:09,980 the milestones of their modern history it was said again and again were the reforms of the period around 1500. 421 00:48:09,980 --> 00:48:16,040 The struggle against Habsburg tyranny that culminated in the thirty years war and the Peace of Westphalia, 422 00:48:16,040 --> 00:48:22,460 which had reaffirmed the composite polity and the fundamental rights that it guaranteed its inhabitants. 423 00:48:22,460 --> 00:48:26,360 This history, it was said, showed a steady progression. 424 00:48:26,360 --> 00:48:36,380 It was thus in the 18th century a reasonable history, a history from which it was reasonable to make assumptions about the future. 425 00:48:36,380 --> 00:48:43,190 The future, of course, was destroyed, the empire came to an end, not because it was decayed or decrepit, 426 00:48:43,190 --> 00:48:47,750 but because it suffered the relentless onslaught of French armies from 1792. 427 00:48:47,750 --> 00:48:51,410 And because Napoleon was determined that it should cease. 428 00:48:51,410 --> 00:49:00,620 But both the discussion and the memory of the institutions of the Empire informed German political debate into the 20th century. 429 00:49:00,620 --> 00:49:09,680 These issues also have important implications, I think, for our understanding of the cartel and indeed for the subsequent history of Germany. 430 00:49:09,680 --> 00:49:14,960 For all the talk about a departure from the old Zonder, the narratives of German history, 431 00:49:14,960 --> 00:49:21,170 the Zonda which in fact remains in place in almost every modern account, 432 00:49:21,170 --> 00:49:24,320 the old empire was programmed to fail, 433 00:49:24,320 --> 00:49:31,410 and its failure forms the dismal backdrop to the disaster that enfolded in Germany in the 19th and 20th centuries. 434 00:49:31,410 --> 00:49:39,380 In other words, the the old narrative of early modern history in Germany is still very much there and still shapes in a sense, 435 00:49:39,380 --> 00:49:45,530 or is set to shape the way in which Germany developed, first of all, in a late or retarded way. 436 00:49:45,530 --> 00:49:51,440 And secondly, in a ultimately disastrous way understanding. 437 00:49:51,440 --> 00:49:57,440 However, the imperial context of the of Clell helps us to think do two things. 438 00:49:57,440 --> 00:50:01,790 Firstly, it puts the dominant views of that movement into perspective. 439 00:50:01,790 --> 00:50:12,950 It's gradualism is rejection of revolutionary solutions, its sense of being the product of a uniquely German state framework and national history. 440 00:50:12,950 --> 00:50:21,500 Secondly, it provides a new perspective on the post enlightenment in Germany, or perhaps one might even say the continuing enlightenment. 441 00:50:21,500 --> 00:50:27,770 There were, of course, critics of the of Clell, as indeed there have been throughout the 18th century. 442 00:50:27,770 --> 00:50:31,970 But in future, perhaps we should pay more attention to other things as well. 443 00:50:31,970 --> 00:50:39,800 And one might think of the following short list The focus of Clear, which persisted through the middle decades of the 19th century, 444 00:50:39,800 --> 00:50:44,750 propagated not at the high level of philosophers in the succession of Hegel, 445 00:50:44,750 --> 00:50:55,010 but by local reformers, by teachers, by clergy who were propagating these ideals of the late 18th century well into the 1850s and 1860s. 446 00:50:55,010 --> 00:51:00,410 The political debates about representative and judicial institutions that I've mentioned already, 447 00:51:00,410 --> 00:51:06,080 the debates about law and citizens rights and the safeguarding of civil society. 448 00:51:06,080 --> 00:51:11,330 The continuing concern in Germany about religious freedom and liberty of conscience. 449 00:51:11,330 --> 00:51:16,550 The significance of German secularism was the fourth confession into the 19th century, 450 00:51:16,550 --> 00:51:21,650 perhaps the heirs of German religious radicalism and free thinking. 451 00:51:21,650 --> 00:51:29,930 An enormous amount of attention has been devoted by historians to the emergence of the radical right in late 19th century Germany. 452 00:51:29,930 --> 00:51:39,110 Yet the solid middle also persisted. The key legacies of the claim the rest of the state, the rule of law, liberties, toleration. 453 00:51:39,110 --> 00:51:45,500 It's true that they were undermined in the short term by Nazis and in particular circumstances created by war, 454 00:51:45,500 --> 00:51:52,640 defeat incomplete and contested regime change and the economic chaos of the 1920s. 455 00:51:52,640 --> 00:51:59,330 Yet the continuity of of clashing ideals into the second half of the 20th century is striking and should, 456 00:51:59,330 --> 00:52:03,650 I think, play a major part in any future narrative of German history? 457 00:52:03,650 --> 00:52:11,180 From the later Middle Ages to the present, this narrative would involve both a new approach to the of offlo and to the way 458 00:52:11,180 --> 00:52:16,070 the history of its reception has been written since the late 19th century. 459 00:52:16,070 --> 00:52:23,780 It is, I think, a story that is more complex and infinitely more fascinating than the one Jonathan Israel has told. 460 00:52:23,780 --> 00:52:28,545 Thank you very much.