1
00:00:00,530 --> 00:00:09,130
Stop. Thanks for coming back. So listen to this lecture on Julius Caesar.

2
00:00:09,130 --> 00:00:19,880
So. Julius Caesar comes through a period of extraordinary output by Shakespeare at the very end of the 16th century.

3
00:00:19,880 --> 00:00:25,980
Strange appearance so brilliantly in his work, 50, 99 a Year in the Life of Shakespeare.

4
00:00:25,980 --> 00:00:30,870
Between the autumn of 15, 98 and the end of 15, 99.

5
00:00:30,870 --> 00:00:45,720
I can pretty confidently date much ado about nothing. As you like it, honey, the fifth probably initial work on Hamlet as well as Julius Caesar.

6
00:00:45,720 --> 00:00:46,770
That's quite interesting grouping.

7
00:00:46,770 --> 00:00:56,970
We tend to always think about Julius Caesar in terms of its Roman themes and alongside other Roman plays coronate as Antony Cleopatra,

8
00:00:56,970 --> 00:01:02,930
with which obviously shares some narrative. Connexions are major types of chronicles.

9
00:01:02,930 --> 00:01:10,700
The electors will be placed already. What I'm trying to just in this lecture is some of the ways in which Julius Caesar might fit in that with

10
00:01:10,700 --> 00:01:20,020
99 cluster rather than in Dan's already pretty well known kind of romantic tarsa sort of narrative,

11
00:01:20,020 --> 00:01:23,460
which fits it with other rhythms. OK.

12
00:01:23,460 --> 00:01:35,490
So the play itself, Julius Caesar tells us about the assassination by Cassius Brutus of the Roman leader Julius Caesar.

13
00:01:35,490 --> 00:01:42,300
Caesar is killed in the capital right in the middle of the plague to rival orations over

14
00:01:42,300 --> 00:01:49,200
his body to persuade the people of Rome to interpret this not as a road to their freedom,

15
00:01:49,200 --> 00:01:55,020
but as an act of violent treachery. The assassins are driven from Rome.

16
00:01:55,020 --> 00:02:02,160
They are ultimately defeated in a battle with the forces of Mark Antony and Octavius Caesar.

17
00:02:02,160 --> 00:02:06,270
Now, it's quite hard to give a more elaborate summary since the question of what all

18
00:02:06,270 --> 00:02:11,700
this means and how to interpret it is in fact the whole business of the play.

19
00:02:11,700 --> 00:02:18,460
So I've tried to avoid the question of judgement, but it's clearly something which was always hanging over the assassination of Caesar.

20
00:02:18,460 --> 00:02:25,650
It was a classic classroom exercise in the 16th century grammar school, one that I'm sure Shakespeare did,

21
00:02:25,650 --> 00:02:31,440
which was to argue both sides of the question, was Brutus justified to kill Caesar?

22
00:02:31,440 --> 00:02:38,780
So it's kind of exemplary question in how you might use rhetoric persuasively to make one case or another.

23
00:02:38,780 --> 00:02:45,450
That grammar school staple called in the tranquil parts and translate parts and arguing both

24
00:02:45,450 --> 00:02:51,670
sides of the proposition to the question of whether Julius Caesar's assassination is justified,

25
00:02:51,670 --> 00:02:54,150
meaning the language we use to talk about it.

26
00:02:54,150 --> 00:03:02,880
Brutus and Cassius are often called conspirators, and we know from modern takes on dates that one man's freedom fighters and as amongst terrorists,

27
00:03:02,880 --> 00:03:11,130
one man's conspirator is another man's kind of politician or whatever to the language of that is already quite difficult, I think.

28
00:03:11,130 --> 00:03:16,560
But the question of the play's own politics and its position on the offensive depicts its own.

29
00:03:16,560 --> 00:03:25,340
It is an uneasy one, and that makes Julius Caesar a particularly interesting place to think about through its performance history,

30
00:03:25,340 --> 00:03:33,270
where performances have tended to want quite clearly to identify good and bodies or to identify the shafe.

31
00:03:33,270 --> 00:03:40,080
The moral shape of this play by, for instance, having Brutus and Cassius and the others in us,

32
00:03:40,080 --> 00:03:48,060
not Nazi Blackshirts, or having them as kind of Che Guevara kind of freedom people.

33
00:03:48,060 --> 00:03:52,430
You can see that they're very, very different kinds of judgement.

34
00:03:52,430 --> 00:04:01,740
I'm certain in the theatre the play has some that kind of political work, which is tended to clarify what in the text is rather unclear.

35
00:04:01,740 --> 00:04:09,720
So the question I want to structure this lecture around kind of is that old one, was Brutus justified in killing Caesar?

36
00:04:09,720 --> 00:04:17,400
But not quite. So I want to try and talk about the next murder we see moments later on, say an unconscious.

37
00:04:17,400 --> 00:04:23,610
This is what it looks like, picking the wrong bit of the play to focus on and let's see whether that works or not.

38
00:04:23,610 --> 00:04:28,770
So immediately after the death of Caesar, which is clearly the most important thing in the play,

39
00:04:28,770 --> 00:04:33,090
a group of Roman citizens exit the stage with that ultimate political trophy.

40
00:04:33,090 --> 00:04:39,420
The body, the body of Caesar, the body of Caesar is a very interesting prop in this play.

41
00:04:39,420 --> 00:04:43,730
I think we get that recalled when we get Polonius, his body as a prop.

42
00:04:43,730 --> 00:04:48,870
You know that there's a relation between those two plays when Hamlet and Polonius are talking

43
00:04:48,870 --> 00:04:54,060
about at the play of Julius Caesar that seem to be recalling the parts of the Chamberlains man,

44
00:04:54,060 --> 00:05:00,090
a play that's previously been on. And I think Caesar thinking about Caesar and Polonius is the same actor gives

45
00:05:00,090 --> 00:05:04,910
us quite interesting take on what Caesar how Caesar might have been performed.

46
00:05:04,910 --> 00:05:12,720
But if you're interested in anything like an object to everything, theory props the kind of phenomenology of stuff.

47
00:05:12,720 --> 00:05:17,810
Caesar's body is a really interesting case. It's not quite a person and not quite a prop, but.

48
00:05:17,810 --> 00:05:24,380
Lump of stuff that needs to be moved about and over, which is a huge amount of interpretive energy.

49
00:05:24,380 --> 00:05:31,070
So Grumman's citizens exit the stage with the body of Caesar. And then we get a tiny vignette of the social violence,

50
00:05:31,070 --> 00:05:38,730
which seems to have been unleashed by the assassination, a character we have not previously met or heard of.

51
00:05:38,730 --> 00:05:48,530
It's intercepted by what the text calls for plebeians, for common people, the people of Rome.

52
00:05:48,530 --> 00:05:53,240
He was interrogated briefly about who he is and why he is abroad.

53
00:05:53,240 --> 00:05:58,700
He gives his name and vocation Cinner, the poet.

54
00:05:58,700 --> 00:06:04,460
Now the name Cinner already echoes in the name, in the names, and it already echoes in the play.

55
00:06:04,460 --> 00:06:11,060
It's the name of the plebeians immediately seise on of one of the conspirators, Cinner.

56
00:06:11,060 --> 00:06:17,060
The poet haplessly attempts to escape by saying he's not some of the conspirators of sin of the poet,

57
00:06:17,060 --> 00:06:21,650
but he's nevertheless set upon by the mob with cries of terror in tech.

58
00:06:21,650 --> 00:06:28,360
And there's no sincerity in the FOLIA, which is the early, early text of Julius Caesar from sixteen twenty three.

59
00:06:28,360 --> 00:06:33,560
But it's generally assumed that of the poet is murdered. So my question is why?

60
00:06:33,560 --> 00:06:38,210
What's the purpose of this small detail and the detail which has almost always

61
00:06:38,210 --> 00:06:44,600
been emitted from productions of the play before the middle of the 20th century?

62
00:06:44,600 --> 00:06:49,850
So I'm thinking about the role of singer, the poet. I want to try to think about a number of related issues.

63
00:06:49,850 --> 00:06:59,100
We might think about our formal structural internal to the architecture of the play and

64
00:06:59,100 --> 00:07:04,400
also to try and think about the representation of the poet in Shakespeare's works.

65
00:07:04,400 --> 00:07:13,280
It's hard it's hard not to be drawn to the idea that a poet figure coming on stage is some sort of self reflexive cameo of other kinds.

66
00:07:13,280 --> 00:07:22,250
Let's try and see where we can get with that. But first, I want to try and think about structure.

67
00:07:22,250 --> 00:07:30,830
Pretty much every commentary on Julius Caesar. Points out that Julius Caesar is a play named for a character who is killed in the middle.

68
00:07:30,830 --> 00:07:35,870
Caesar appears in only five scenes of the play.

69
00:07:35,870 --> 00:07:42,470
And although he continues as a ghost and as the abiding presence in the play is political imaginary,

70
00:07:42,470 --> 00:07:48,050
the losers' references on vague references to Caesar in the language of the play right up to its final lines.

71
00:07:48,050 --> 00:07:54,860
It's nevertheless true that this is a play where the climax is definitely, I think, in the middle.

72
00:07:54,860 --> 00:08:02,740
We have a play organised around the build up to and then the aftermath of a climactic event.

73
00:08:02,740 --> 00:08:07,710
So most of the other lectures I took about plays which are teleological, which have to get to the end.

74
00:08:07,710 --> 00:08:13,460
And in some ways comedy is a very teleological genre. There's a point where we know we've just got to sort it all out.

75
00:08:13,460 --> 00:08:20,480
Everybody's got to get married. Often comedies are quite so pragmatic about that and realise, OK, this is what's going to happen now.

76
00:08:20,480 --> 00:08:24,590
So that's a kind of TV logical structure which says this is where we've got to get to.

77
00:08:24,590 --> 00:08:30,980
It doesn't really quite matter what happens. It can in between.

78
00:08:30,980 --> 00:08:38,020
But this is a play which I think is until you're logical. It's not the end that it's trying to get to the middle.

79
00:08:38,020 --> 00:08:40,760
Now, that might seem quite obvious,

80
00:08:40,760 --> 00:08:49,070
but maybe it's useful to see how different this is from the way Shakespeare structures a similar story type in other plays.

81
00:08:49,070 --> 00:08:53,450
Shakespeare deals with regicide. Caesar isn't quite a king.

82
00:08:53,450 --> 00:09:01,100
And in fact, the start of the play is about him refusing to become king, but nevertheless, the assassination of the political leader.

83
00:09:01,100 --> 00:09:06,830
In some sense, the person who embodies the sense of the state doesn't.

84
00:09:06,830 --> 00:09:11,510
That's a story type. Obviously, Shakespeare deals with a number of occasions.

85
00:09:11,510 --> 00:09:17,710
Let's take two examples. One which comes before Julius Caesar and one afterwards.

86
00:09:17,710 --> 00:09:22,520
So the one that's before let's get rich is the second.

87
00:09:22,520 --> 00:09:30,000
So, Richard, the second two is about a play in which a powerful leader may be a too powerful leader, is toppled, is assassinated.

88
00:09:30,000 --> 00:09:35,810
The image of the second Richard's own death comes right at the end of the play.

89
00:09:35,810 --> 00:09:40,880
So there are two immediate effects of that on the play's politics.

90
00:09:40,880 --> 00:09:49,250
Firstly, it constructs a narrative out of tragedy, a story which is structured around the life and death of one person.

91
00:09:49,250 --> 00:09:56,660
It's a tragedy. We know that. And whether we feel sympathy with Richard or with his political nemesis, Bowling Brook,

92
00:09:56,660 --> 00:10:01,390
the structure of that play is in the kind of mediaeval form of tragedy sometimes called dead.

93
00:10:01,390 --> 00:10:10,400
Kazee was the fall of princes there catapults. So that's the first confessed effect of having Richard deferent in the play.

94
00:10:10,400 --> 00:10:17,640
The second effect, though, is that there are no consequences of the regicide, even though Bolingbrook says or as now is king.

95
00:10:17,640 --> 00:10:23,040
He says, you know, I feel terrible about this. And then to go to Jerusalem. I feel so guilty, really meaning to be killed.

96
00:10:23,040 --> 00:10:29,700
This is so there's a sense of guilt, but it's too near the end of the play for us really to get anything, anything more than that.

97
00:10:29,700 --> 00:10:32,760
So there are no immediate consequences.

98
00:10:32,760 --> 00:10:42,710
All the things that were so terribly predicted about what would happen if Richard was killed don't come to pass within that play.

99
00:10:42,710 --> 00:10:47,960
So, Judy, so politically, second language predates Julius Caesar in Shakespeare's writing career.

100
00:10:47,960 --> 00:10:52,070
It's a play which is really all about the build up to the assassination of the leader.

101
00:10:52,070 --> 00:10:58,220
This is all the build up. Let's take an alternative look at a play which comes after Julius Caesar, about the same thing.

102
00:10:58,220 --> 00:11:03,630
My. My greatest play is all about the consequences of assassination.

103
00:11:03,630 --> 00:11:06,860
Helpfully gives us the word assassination as well.

104
00:11:06,860 --> 00:11:15,830
So it's about the unravelling of political and psychological integrity across the four acts which follow the murder became Duncan.

105
00:11:15,830 --> 00:11:23,360
So in some ways, my friend isn't at all interested in in the build up or how to know how to do it or how to get on with it or why to try doing it.

106
00:11:23,360 --> 00:11:29,800
It's all about the consequences and the aftermath. So it's the structural and the ethical opposite of Richard the second.

107
00:11:29,800 --> 00:11:37,910
It's all about the punishment, psychological punishment, political punishment meted on my back for what he does.

108
00:11:37,910 --> 00:11:50,590
In between these two versions saying we've got Julius Caesar balanced on the body of Caesar is a kind of plot fulcrum between build up and aftermath.

109
00:11:50,590 --> 00:11:56,490
I related, I think, to these structural questions is the question of the antagonist or hero.

110
00:11:56,490 --> 00:12:01,650
Both Richard the Second and Julius Caesar are named for the murdered ruler.

111
00:12:01,650 --> 00:12:08,580
Macbeth takes its name from the assassin who can see something really important has changed about where where our interest is.

112
00:12:08,580 --> 00:12:16,940
Are we interested in the person who is, you know, who is being killed or are we interested in the person who's going to kill them?

113
00:12:16,940 --> 00:12:23,580
Mid 20th century critics were curiously preoccupied with the question of whether Julius Caesar ought more properly to be called.

114
00:12:23,580 --> 00:12:29,700
The tragedy of Brutus is not a particularly interesting question, but they're very kind of they're very worried about it.

115
00:12:29,700 --> 00:12:36,420
But it appears it does point to the fact that this is a play where we see Shakespeare's interest moving from the person who is being killed,

116
00:12:36,420 --> 00:12:42,900
the Richard, the second figure to the person who is doing the killing, the Macbeth figure,

117
00:12:42,900 --> 00:12:47,820
Brutus muses in soliloquy on the murder of Julius Caesar in certain ways, which very,

118
00:12:47,820 --> 00:12:58,710
very clearly anticipates that fact alone in his orchard active scene one, Brutus famously begins his speech about Caesar's death with its conclusion.

119
00:12:58,710 --> 00:13:04,290
It must be by its death. It must be by his death.

120
00:13:04,290 --> 00:13:11,820
And he goes on to justify the killing, not with what Caesar has already done, but by what he might go on to do.

121
00:13:11,820 --> 00:13:22,530
Therefore, think him as a serpent's egg which hatched would assess kind of mischievous and kill him in the shower.

122
00:13:22,530 --> 00:13:28,680
What's hatching here, then, is not just the murder of Caesar, but the play Macbeth.

123
00:13:28,680 --> 00:13:34,140
Like the later king murderer, Brutus cannot bring himself to name it Steed.

124
00:13:34,140 --> 00:13:38,940
It must be by his death. It's directly Lifemark best if it were done.

125
00:13:38,940 --> 00:13:41,490
One test done for while it were done quickly.

126
00:13:41,490 --> 00:13:51,210
Both of them use a kind of a pronoun it in place of a noun which they which they can't themselves articulate.

127
00:13:51,210 --> 00:14:04,260
And as Brutus puts it, since Cassius first equipped me against Caesar, I have not slept between the acting of a dreadful thing and the first motion.

128
00:14:04,260 --> 00:14:10,160
All the interim is like a Fantasma or hideous dream.

129
00:14:10,160 --> 00:14:14,280
That Sleepless Macbeth is already here in Shakespeare's sights.

130
00:14:14,280 --> 00:14:20,940
Even Bruce's wife, Portia, aspires to be Lady Macbeth, but unfortunately she's trapped in a kind of history,

131
00:14:20,940 --> 00:14:24,390
played rather by Hotspurs wife Kate in hand with the fourth.

132
00:14:24,390 --> 00:14:28,080
That's to say she's not allowed to do anything.

133
00:14:28,080 --> 00:14:36,820
So this is all to say that the very structure Julius Caesar confirms is ethical equivocation caught between a kind of tragedy of the day.

134
00:14:36,820 --> 00:14:40,320
Kazee was the ruler who is brought down the Richard the second model,

135
00:14:40,320 --> 00:14:51,150
and moving towards a more kind of psychological view of the assassin or that the person is doing something clearly wrong for Macbeth model.

136
00:14:51,150 --> 00:14:59,280
And the play itself shifts like the Roman populace, away from a focus on the conspirators to a focus on their revengers,

137
00:14:59,280 --> 00:15:04,380
the balance of dramatic power into the seeds of changes like the balance of political power.

138
00:15:04,380 --> 00:15:11,190
No individual character rises to displace Caesar, the play's central focus.

139
00:15:11,190 --> 00:15:15,690
So the question of the interpretation of Julius Caesar's assassination is already life.

140
00:15:15,690 --> 00:15:20,070
It's already live in the reception of classical history at the end of the sixteenth century.

141
00:15:20,070 --> 00:15:24,620
That question that's in the school mind was Brutus justified?

142
00:15:24,620 --> 00:15:30,450
And the question is already subconsciously there in the minds of Julius Caesar as killers in the play.

143
00:15:30,450 --> 00:15:36,600
So the play, that's to say, knows about its reception, even as it purports to be running through things in real time.

144
00:15:36,600 --> 00:15:38,310
That's true of all of Shakespeare's history plays.

145
00:15:38,310 --> 00:15:49,230
I think that they they both know that we know it's already happened even as they try and show us how it is happening for the first time.

146
00:15:49,230 --> 00:15:54,780
In part, this is because the conspirators are engaged in the kind of primal scene of English classicism,

147
00:15:54,780 --> 00:15:59,730
the murder of Julius Caesar, which is key to the accounts of Roman Empire.

148
00:15:59,730 --> 00:16:06,630
It was so entirely foundational for the whole idea of Western culture and in part

149
00:16:06,630 --> 00:16:13,620
the kind of wrestling with a very negative mediaeval history of reception when,

150
00:16:13,620 --> 00:16:23,100
for example, Dante had placed Brutus at the very centre of how in his inferno, Brutus is that feeding with Satan,

151
00:16:23,100 --> 00:16:30,270
along with Cassius and Judas, that the only people who were in this special most terrible places.

152
00:16:30,270 --> 00:16:34,080
So we already know this story, that's to say. And the characters in the play.

153
00:16:34,080 --> 00:16:45,760
No, it's to Caesar. Brutus and the rest are already subject to what the critic Linda Charm's is really interesting book called Notorious Identity,

154
00:16:45,760 --> 00:16:52,270
a kind of overdetermined fame, the notorious Identity. Challenges talk in particular about Antony and Cleopatra,

155
00:16:52,270 --> 00:16:57,820
about Troilus and Cressida and about Richard, the third easily develop what she's talking about.

156
00:16:57,820 --> 00:17:01,600
Think in relation to Caesar and Brutus in Julius Caesar.

157
00:17:01,600 --> 00:17:06,760
They themselves know that as they look on Caesar's bleeding corpse,

158
00:17:06,760 --> 00:17:13,720
the assassins discuss how this act will look to the future, the very future in which it's been presented.

159
00:17:13,720 --> 00:17:22,870
So this is Brutus Stewart, Roman Stupe and let us bhave our hands in Caesar's blood up to the elbows and besmirch our swords,

160
00:17:22,870 --> 00:17:29,140
then walk we forth even to the marketplace and waving our red weapons over our heads.

161
00:17:29,140 --> 00:17:34,370
Let's all cry. Preach peace, freedom and liberty.

162
00:17:34,370 --> 00:17:45,970
Stoop man and wash, says Cassius. How many ages hence shall this our lofty ceiling be acted over in states unborn and accents.

163
00:17:45,970 --> 00:17:48,130
Yet unknown.

164
00:17:48,130 --> 00:17:59,380
How many times shall Caesar lead in sport to the interesting moment right at the time when the murder of Caesar is, as it were, actually happening.

165
00:17:59,380 --> 00:18:03,220
We've got a strong sense that this is a reproduction of something which has already

166
00:18:03,220 --> 00:18:07,840
happened and the act of murder is already understood as an interpretive act.

167
00:18:07,840 --> 00:18:19,240
It's already a play. The stakes unborn and accents yet unknown are the England and the English in which the play is being performed.

168
00:18:19,240 --> 00:18:27,550
Present and future are ironically collapsed as the bloodstained assassins pose for the camera of history.

169
00:18:27,550 --> 00:18:36,760
Let us be sacrifices, not butchers. Brutus tells his fellow conspirators that be sacrifices, but not butchers.

170
00:18:36,760 --> 00:18:42,220
The question of how to present and interpret the act is intrinsic to its planning and permission.

171
00:18:42,220 --> 00:18:46,930
This is a piece of political theatre and Julius Caesar has always been a play about politics.

172
00:18:46,930 --> 00:18:51,340
But the act within it are already acts of political theatre.

173
00:18:51,340 --> 00:18:57,610
It's a series of soundbites, something already, always already staged.

174
00:18:57,610 --> 00:19:07,030
And the play, I think, is deeply conscious of being a play. It is both the act and the representation of that act.

175
00:19:07,030 --> 00:19:11,950
At the centre of Julius Caesar is a great rhetorical set, pieces is a thing everybody knows about the place.

176
00:19:11,950 --> 00:19:17,080
Everybody talks about Marc Anthony speech over the body of Caesar.

177
00:19:17,080 --> 00:19:23,530
Marc Anthony speech works to turn the play's allegiances decisively back to the heirs of Caesar.

178
00:19:23,530 --> 00:19:32,710
And away from his assassins. But long before this moment, this pivotal moment right from the beginning of the play.

179
00:19:32,710 --> 00:19:38,440
I think this is a work deeply conscious of how and events need to be interpreted.

180
00:19:38,440 --> 00:19:45,100
It presents numerous examples of a distinctly interpretive conflict.

181
00:19:45,100 --> 00:19:53,560
We might think of Renaissance paintings like Paul Banks, the ambassadors, which has a kind of anamorphic what's called an animal fic element to it.

182
00:19:53,560 --> 00:19:57,430
You look at it from different perspectives and it looks different.

183
00:19:57,430 --> 00:20:06,580
This is the anamorphic Renaissance painting might be a kind of visual metaphor for this play of perspectives.

184
00:20:06,580 --> 00:20:11,290
Calpurnia screen in Julius Caesar is a striking example of this process.

185
00:20:11,290 --> 00:20:15,490
Caesar reports that Calpurnia has had a terrible dream. She drank tonight.

186
00:20:15,490 --> 00:20:19,540
She saw my statue, which, like a fountain with an hundreds spouts,

187
00:20:19,540 --> 00:20:27,100
did wrong pure blood and many lusty Romans came smiling and did bathed their hands in it.

188
00:20:27,100 --> 00:20:31,970
And these days she applied for warnings and portents and evils imminent and on her knees.

189
00:20:31,970 --> 00:20:38,590
Half beg for the tide will stay at home. Today took up only the strength that these are statue runs with blood.

190
00:20:38,590 --> 00:20:46,630
We all know, of course, that Caesar is going to be murdered. So when component companies dream is told us, when we kind of know it's true.

191
00:20:46,630 --> 00:20:54,310
But we know that we also know that nothing can happen to stop this. So it's not going to be it's not going to affect what seems it does.

192
00:20:54,310 --> 00:20:58,810
It has the curious quality of prophecy and retrospection at the same time.

193
00:20:58,810 --> 00:21:06,290
So within the fiction, it's a prophecy within our reception. The fiction is a reactive retrospection.

194
00:21:06,290 --> 00:21:16,390
But in Julius Caesar deck, yes, nimbly reinterprets the dream as a metaphor for this dream is all and misinterpreted, he says, comforting up.

195
00:21:16,390 --> 00:21:25,810
It was a vision, fair and fortunate. Your statue spouting blood in many pipes in which so many smiling Romans Bay signifies that from you.

196
00:21:25,810 --> 00:21:35,290
Great Rome shall suck reviving blood and that great men shall press the tinctures, stain's relics and cognisance.

197
00:21:35,290 --> 00:21:43,330
This by Carphone Calpurnia. His dream signified. So reinterpreting the bloody image is not real but symbolic.

198
00:21:43,330 --> 00:21:47,290
Persuade Caesar that his shooting deed goes to the capital where of course he's going to

199
00:21:47,290 --> 00:21:53,800
be turned into exactly that fountain of blood in which his murderers bait his hands.

200
00:21:53,800 --> 00:21:59,670
So the plan is already established that the interpretation of acts and words is its most crucial theme.

201
00:21:59,670 --> 00:22:06,250
That is, his language is all about kind of literary criticism. It's all a misinterpretation.

202
00:22:06,250 --> 00:22:16,450
This is why Calpurnia dream is signified. This is the language of criticism being bit being deployed in the play itself.

203
00:22:16,450 --> 00:22:22,180
The play that is established that the interpretation of acts and words is its most crucial theme, and further,

204
00:22:22,180 --> 00:22:29,350
that it is very hard to distinguish the act itself from its interpretations when some way

205
00:22:29,350 --> 00:22:35,230
in the territory of John Boatyards infamous contention that the Gulf War never took place.

206
00:22:35,230 --> 00:22:42,470
What we saw was merely a standing, endless media simulacra behind which there was nothing at all.

207
00:22:42,470 --> 00:22:48,550
Here in Julius Caesar, Shakespeare stages that very nothingness which is behind our interpretations,

208
00:22:48,550 --> 00:22:54,850
sometimes refusing to give us access to the event itself, only to subsequent interpretations.

209
00:22:54,850 --> 00:23:04,570
The play actually begins in this mode. Brutus and Cassius are talking about Caesar's tendency to tyranny and despotism.

210
00:23:04,570 --> 00:23:09,040
This conversation is punctuated by off-stage, shouts and cheers.

211
00:23:09,040 --> 00:23:17,500
Brutus and Cassius interpret these as the response when the people offer the crown to Caesar, which he keeps rejecting.

212
00:23:17,500 --> 00:23:23,890
This doesn't reassure Brutus and Cassius about how ambitious he is, even though on the face of it, you would think he ought to.

213
00:23:23,890 --> 00:23:26,320
He's offered the crown and he rejects it.

214
00:23:26,320 --> 00:23:33,370
But since we don't seem to see for ourselves, we can't begin to judge whether this is simply politic on Caesar's part.

215
00:23:33,370 --> 00:23:37,810
He rejects it while making it quite clear that really he wants it all genuine.

216
00:23:37,810 --> 00:23:46,000
He does not want to became the dialectic between showing my meetings and telling.

217
00:23:46,000 --> 00:23:50,710
Diageo says it's always intrinsic to theatre,

218
00:23:50,710 --> 00:23:57,140
and therefore I think it is always worth looking quite closely at what Shakespeare decides not to show us.

219
00:23:57,140 --> 00:24:01,900
There's something also about something which later cinema, I think is very clear about that.

220
00:24:01,900 --> 00:24:06,950
When we're not shown something, we're kind of desperately wanting to see it.

221
00:24:06,950 --> 00:24:13,310
He's close and insistent interpretive examples, what we might call the place hermeneutic consciousness.

222
00:24:13,310 --> 00:24:16,430
I mean, we're already primed then for that great act of reinterpretation,

223
00:24:16,430 --> 00:24:23,410
which is Marc Anthony, his famous friends, Romans and countrymen, speech in Act three.

224
00:24:23,410 --> 00:24:30,470
Antony's skill is impart to persuade by introducing new information about Caesar.

225
00:24:30,470 --> 00:24:39,140
He has left 75 drachmas to each Roman citizen in his will as well as his parks and villas by the Tiberg as a recreation ground.

226
00:24:39,140 --> 00:24:44,550
We never know whether that's true, even though Anthony is waving about what the will is as a document.

227
00:24:44,550 --> 00:24:48,500
There's no corroboration of that is tendentious. De Jesus.

228
00:24:48,500 --> 00:24:51,990
Not my nieces. Of course I know.

229
00:24:51,990 --> 00:24:56,400
And Shakespeare clearly knows that Digest's showing can always also be misleading.

230
00:24:56,400 --> 00:25:01,280
It's not the case that not just the case that to be told something is therefore is to be suspicious of it,

231
00:25:01,280 --> 00:25:09,140
but to be shown something is to have a kind of authentic relation to it. I guess that's what's going on with ocular proof in Othello.

232
00:25:09,140 --> 00:25:17,120
But Marc Anthony is long seen a slowing down after the violence of the murder itself works to sketch out the incompatibility

233
00:25:17,120 --> 00:25:24,770
of his evidence from Caesar's will about his generosity against the claimed group makes about Caesar's ambition all the time.

234
00:25:24,770 --> 00:25:30,650
Ironically, emphasising Brutus is an honourable man.

235
00:25:30,650 --> 00:25:35,150
Simple repetition of this phrase does some of the work of reinterpretation here.

236
00:25:35,150 --> 00:25:39,200
Each time, Anthony says, Brutus is an honourable man.

237
00:25:39,200 --> 00:25:48,290
It means something slightly different until it has gradually completed a 180 degree turn to mean quite the opposite.

238
00:25:48,290 --> 00:25:53,180
So it's taken a while to get to the death of sin of the poet. Just as it takes the play a while.

239
00:25:53,180 --> 00:25:57,860
But I think we may be now a little bit more ready to think about it.

240
00:25:57,860 --> 00:26:07,310
The death of sin of the poet, that's to say, comes within the context of deeply contested interpretation.

241
00:26:07,310 --> 00:26:17,810
It erupts as a short sequence of some 35 lines after Anthony is deliberately extended and dilated oratory of the previous long scenes I've ever seen,

242
00:26:17,810 --> 00:26:28,040
which is about 300 lines making. So about 20 minutes, perhaps 25 minutes even, and then a scene of 35, 35 lines.

243
00:26:28,040 --> 00:26:35,740
So just a few minutes. So it's a structural contrast in both ways.

244
00:26:35,740 --> 00:26:40,600
It's about action without words or about the failure of language to effect action.

245
00:26:40,600 --> 00:26:45,580
So sooner attempts to plead for his life but has no success at all.

246
00:26:45,580 --> 00:26:53,560
So that's so far from the measured, extended eloquence by which Anthony persuades the same mob,

247
00:26:53,560 --> 00:26:59,200
the same people, the same for business to be what he wants.

248
00:26:59,200 --> 00:27:06,790
The immediate Panopto amount and its clever, elevated rhetoric seems therefore to be the barbarity of mob violence.

249
00:27:06,790 --> 00:27:18,850
What Anthony was persuaded the Philippines to do by means of his rhetoric is to turn on the conspirators or people who by their names.

250
00:27:18,850 --> 00:27:23,710
After the overdetermined death of Caesar, about which characters within the play.

251
00:27:23,710 --> 00:27:28,660
And in that much more extensive cultural discourse have talked and interpreted so much.

252
00:27:28,660 --> 00:27:37,390
So after all that, we get this bewildering and random death. But it's also a death which perhaps recaps what we have just seen in miniature.

253
00:27:37,390 --> 00:27:43,690
In his short scene, sinner like Caesar or Calpurnia has a sinister and unsettling dream.

254
00:27:43,690 --> 00:27:49,810
I drank tonight that I did feast with Caesar and things unluckily crushed my fantasy.

255
00:27:49,810 --> 00:27:55,240
I have no will to wander forth of doors. Yet something leads me forth.

256
00:27:55,240 --> 00:28:00,520
We've already had one of those kind of fated people coming out to meet their own death.

257
00:28:00,520 --> 00:28:08,470
And sinner for some reason is somehow recapping that he too lives by the capital.

258
00:28:08,470 --> 00:28:15,760
The plebeians tear him. They set on him as a pack just as the conspirators sat on Caesar.

259
00:28:15,760 --> 00:28:25,790
So in some sense, this short sleeve is a recap or shortened version of what we've just been through, a kind of political echo or aftershock.

260
00:28:25,790 --> 00:28:31,070
It would be fabulous to double Cinner, the poet with the Caesar ACDA, although I think it would be difficult to do.

261
00:28:31,070 --> 00:28:39,290
Take a nifty editorial footwork, given that the body of Caesar has sort of passed in the corridor at the entrance of Cinner.

262
00:28:39,290 --> 00:28:41,450
But thinking about doubling,

263
00:28:41,450 --> 00:28:50,640
it's always a way to think theatrically about how localised or cameo character might be connected to and gain weight from other plots as well.

264
00:28:50,640 --> 00:29:01,000
When the ghost of old Hamala plates 14 brass or the grave digger almost famously included in The Fool, a double layer.

265
00:29:01,000 --> 00:29:06,700
Whenever we get a real echo in early modern plays, think perhaps about the Duchess of Malfi, for instance.

266
00:29:06,700 --> 00:29:12,910
The purpose of the echo is usually to mock by repeating the ends of words or lines.

267
00:29:12,910 --> 00:29:20,590
The echo disembody language sends it back kind of meaninglessly to its speaker and makes that speaker look foolish.

268
00:29:20,590 --> 00:29:31,420
Turning the speaking subject into a kind of automaton. It may be that this visual echo in Julius Caesar serves something of the same purpose.

269
00:29:31,420 --> 00:29:42,670
It mocks or undermines. There's a humour in this scene as well as or perhaps in conjunction with its abrupt or or absurd horror.

270
00:29:42,670 --> 00:29:47,140
The plebeians fire a sequence of questions that Cinner. What is your name?

271
00:29:47,140 --> 00:29:51,250
Where are you going? Why do you dwell? And then most random neval, perhaps.

272
00:29:51,250 --> 00:29:56,740
Are you a married man or a bachelor? I'm sure every month, directly I am briefly eyeing wisely.

273
00:29:56,740 --> 00:30:03,940
I am truly your best. The repetition here is clearly ridiculous.

274
00:30:03,940 --> 00:30:10,240
So many questions. Not time for to answer. No gap for his answers to the questions.

275
00:30:10,240 --> 00:30:18,730
He then answers the questions all in one speak, repeating them to answer every man directly and briefly.

276
00:30:18,730 --> 00:30:26,290
So there's a kind of comedy or farce about the way the speeches unfold here.

277
00:30:26,290 --> 00:30:31,420
Perhaps Marx's dictum on repeating history might work here.

278
00:30:31,420 --> 00:30:41,130
Writing about the coup of Louis Napoleon in France in 1851, KOOCH, quite interestingly, is related to Julius Caesar.

279
00:30:41,130 --> 00:30:46,960
It's codenamed Ruby County, which is part of Caesar's own moved to power.

280
00:30:46,960 --> 00:30:52,150
But Marx cites Heikal as a brilliant subcultural kind of way.

281
00:30:52,150 --> 00:30:58,090
Hegel remarked somewhat. But all the great wealth, historical facts and personages appear, so to speak.

282
00:30:58,090 --> 00:31:02,950
Twice, he forgot to argue the first time as tragedy.

283
00:31:02,950 --> 00:31:12,130
The second time, as far as Hegel remarked somewhere, that all the great world historic facts and personages appear, so to speak.

284
00:31:12,130 --> 00:31:19,510
Twice, he forgot to add the first time as tragedy, the second time as farce.

285
00:31:19,510 --> 00:31:26,050
So does Sydnor, the poet, represent the repetition as farce of the tragic Caesar?

286
00:31:26,050 --> 00:31:31,000
Is the humour of this scene intended as a kind of relief after the extended stress?

287
00:31:31,000 --> 00:31:37,660
What has gone before? What does it establish? The jesting savagery of mob rule?

288
00:31:37,660 --> 00:31:44,390
Is it. That's to say a contrast with or a clarification of what has gone before?

289
00:31:44,390 --> 00:31:51,940
Our Brutus and his co-conspirators more likely to look like sacrifices when they're compared to the butchers of Cinner?

290
00:31:51,940 --> 00:32:05,130
Or are both acts of violence seem to be the same CINNER The poet's death is cued by the previous interpretive act as a symbol or a Maten,

291
00:32:05,130 --> 00:32:11,910
and perhaps in military terms, the part for the whole some kind of snapshot of something larger than itself,

292
00:32:11,910 --> 00:32:16,300
but is missing that analysis that elsewhere. The play carefully elaborates.

293
00:32:16,300 --> 00:32:27,040
No one has time to interpret it. So it's left hanging. It's an emblem without its motto or a parable without the gloss.

294
00:32:27,040 --> 00:32:27,700
Now, in large part,

295
00:32:27,700 --> 00:32:35,510
the scene makes clear that it is because Cinner has the misfortune to share his name with one of the conspirators that he is killed.

296
00:32:35,510 --> 00:32:41,290
The plebeians are perhaps unwittingly carrying out an act of dramatic hygiene.

297
00:32:41,290 --> 00:32:46,060
It is not good for a player to have two characters with the same name.

298
00:32:46,060 --> 00:32:54,850
Something similar happens at the end of a contemporaneous play with which Julius Caesar may seem to have almost nothing in common as you'd like it.

299
00:32:54,850 --> 00:32:58,210
The dominant theme as you like it is the quarrel between brothers.

300
00:32:58,210 --> 00:33:08,530
Maybe there is something similarly fraternal in the relationship between the as of Caesar Brutus and Mark Antony in as you like it, Oliver.

301
00:33:08,530 --> 00:33:15,220
The bad brother and Orlando's a good one are prominent characters who we meet extensively in the play.

302
00:33:15,220 --> 00:33:19,250
But early on there is mention of a third brother, Jake Kreis.

303
00:33:19,250 --> 00:33:26,290
Now something has gone wrong here for the play already has an apparently entirely unrelated character who is already called Jake Rhys,

304
00:33:26,290 --> 00:33:29,050
the melancholic courtier who is part of Duke seniors.

305
00:33:29,050 --> 00:33:37,120
Robin Hood is caught in the forest when Jaquie is the brother of Orlando and Oliver finally enters at the end of the play.

306
00:33:37,120 --> 00:33:41,680
It's a very funny momentary standoff between him and melancholic Jaquiss.

307
00:33:41,680 --> 00:33:49,180
The messages that he's breaking, the rules, why does he come somewhere where there's already somebody who's got this name, one character,

308
00:33:49,180 --> 00:33:55,960
one name, whether it's two characters with the same name, it's clear that one must see that in some way the structure of the play.

309
00:33:55,960 --> 00:33:59,780
That's why Prince Harry's got to kill Hotspur at the end of end, the fourth one.

310
00:33:59,780 --> 00:34:04,480
There just isn't room in the plan for another Henry. It's also why he's got to kill his father.

311
00:34:04,480 --> 00:34:11,920
You've got to be the only Henry in the play. No names in Shakespeare are really interesting properties.

312
00:34:11,920 --> 00:34:18,010
Often they're much more evident to us as readers of protection than they would be in the theatre.

313
00:34:18,010 --> 00:34:24,760
My favourite example is out of Vialet in Twelfth Night. When we read the play, we absolutely know where she is because we're always reading her name.

314
00:34:24,760 --> 00:34:30,370
In fact, in the play, her name is never spoken until she and Sebastian meet right at the end.

315
00:34:30,370 --> 00:34:35,290
Nobody in the play and the play itself. It doesn't seem to know what her name is.

316
00:34:35,290 --> 00:34:41,290
It's worth doing a search of the actual speeches in a play to see how emphatically a character is named in the play world.

317
00:34:41,290 --> 00:34:45,190
Lots of people who play as we know what they're called, but the reason to during the purpose for their name,

318
00:34:45,190 --> 00:34:54,010
in that in the actual story and they never mentioned by name five will announce if we do that search for the sinners in Julius Caesar.

319
00:34:54,010 --> 00:34:58,360
There's obviously something going on about what sin sounds like. Not quite sure what that is.

320
00:34:58,360 --> 00:35:00,520
But if you do a search for the sinners in Julius Caesar,

321
00:35:00,520 --> 00:35:07,720
we can see there are eight references to sinner by name in the spoken words of the play before the second sinner enters into the frame.

322
00:35:07,720 --> 00:35:13,090
So we're quite conscious that this is a name which has already been taken up in the fraternity as the conspirators.

323
00:35:13,090 --> 00:35:17,170
In fact, this is a play in which names proper names are very, very emphatic.

324
00:35:17,170 --> 00:35:22,320
It's part of the monumental lighting, already known quality, with which these great figures resonate,

325
00:35:22,320 --> 00:35:28,810
that they often talk about themselves in the third person as if they are already their own reputations and legends.

326
00:35:28,810 --> 00:35:38,490
Perhaps that idea of notorious identity. So sin in the poet thus emerges into onomatopoeic territory that is already occupied.

327
00:35:38,490 --> 00:35:43,870
The plebeians work quickly to eradicate the USA. Perhaps they do their work too well.

328
00:35:43,870 --> 00:35:48,500
Sydnor, the first then conspirator never reappears after this point either.

329
00:35:48,500 --> 00:35:53,080
Perhaps, perhaps the two figures weren't so distinct. So it's his name then?

330
00:35:53,080 --> 00:35:57,280
That's the headline reason for the attack on Cinner.

331
00:35:57,280 --> 00:36:03,850
But the other reason that I want to just spend a bit of time before we finish is, of course, the fact that he's a poet.

332
00:36:03,850 --> 00:36:08,260
Gary Taylor points out that of the two mentions of the death of Cinner in

333
00:36:08,260 --> 00:36:12,580
North's translation of Plutarch's lives within a noble Grecians and Romanov's,

334
00:36:12,580 --> 00:36:15,530
the source for Julius Caesar as it was.

335
00:36:15,530 --> 00:36:22,110
We had a couple of weeks go for Coriolanus with only one of those two mentions, identifies him as a poet only in passing.

336
00:36:22,110 --> 00:36:26,530
Look important to Plutarch that this murdered singer is a poet.

337
00:36:26,530 --> 00:36:30,740
And in fact, it's more important to Plutarch that that singer is a friend of Caesar's.

338
00:36:30,740 --> 00:36:36,050
Which we don't we don't get quite so strongly when Zinner says, I didn't I.

339
00:36:36,050 --> 00:36:39,830
I could feast with Caesar here and Shakespeare's playing. That's because it's likely.

340
00:36:39,830 --> 00:36:44,310
Because it's completely unlikely. It is somebody time don't doubt about.

341
00:36:44,310 --> 00:36:48,230
With a famous person laugh last night.

342
00:36:48,230 --> 00:36:54,410
So Shakespeare. That's to say. Brings out the poet ness of sinner and emphasises it.

343
00:36:54,410 --> 00:37:00,140
He keeps saying I'm a sinner. The poet. I knew that I am sinner.

344
00:37:00,140 --> 00:37:06,370
The poet. I'm sinner. The poet. One of the prevailing says take him for his bad verses, hat and face.

345
00:37:06,370 --> 00:37:12,240
But first, this is another point which must be kind of funny, I think, in some way.

346
00:37:12,240 --> 00:37:13,980
So Taylor suggests, therefore,

347
00:37:13,980 --> 00:37:20,580
that it's significant that Shakespeare brings the poet to the fore in this scene of mindless cultural violence in Julius Caesar.

348
00:37:20,580 --> 00:37:23,170
It seems as if the poet is innocent.

349
00:37:23,170 --> 00:37:29,040
There is no suggestion that he himself has been involved in politics, just that he shares the name of somebody who has.

350
00:37:29,040 --> 00:37:35,200
We don't know anything about what his poems are like, although the campaigns assume that they're not very good.

351
00:37:35,200 --> 00:37:41,310
It does appear to be a poet is by definition to be a political.

352
00:37:41,310 --> 00:37:52,980
To be a poet is to be the mistaken, mistaken target of mob violence in a scene where clearly he could not have been the real.

353
00:37:52,980 --> 00:38:04,050
He comes with being the kind of person who they really are ready to go for if somehow, like vigilantes targeting paediatrician's playing to pieces,

354
00:38:04,050 --> 00:38:13,470
putting the pieces scene of the poet, because perhaps one of the Renaissance is clearest pieces of iconography about poetry.

355
00:38:13,470 --> 00:38:19,380
The myth of Orpheus Orpheus, the musician poet figure mentioned by Shakespeare on lots of occasions,

356
00:38:19,380 --> 00:38:26,850
who was himself torn apart by a baying mobs and something about poets and being pulled to pieces, which maybe is important.

357
00:38:26,850 --> 00:38:35,130
Perhaps we're supposed to think of Cinner as the ultimate scapegoat. The poet gets it, even though he's done nothing to deserve it.

358
00:38:35,130 --> 00:38:40,050
So he becomes the figure who's more obviously identified usually with the central tragic

359
00:38:40,050 --> 00:38:46,720
protagonist to figure out to whom social and to some extent ritualistically are projected.

360
00:38:46,720 --> 00:38:52,620
But then the poet seems like the play's ultimate innocent bystander in the wrong place at the wrong time.

361
00:38:52,620 --> 00:39:03,810
Caught up in events with which he has nothing to do. And how far, I wonder, should we see his vocation as poet a significant in that representation?

362
00:39:03,810 --> 00:39:08,880
Now, poets in Shakespeare's plays tend to be objects of fun, mostly because that amateurs,

363
00:39:08,880 --> 00:39:15,570
that people who turned to poetry usually badly and usually as a source of humour.

364
00:39:15,570 --> 00:39:25,230
And that's particularly true in these plays around 50 99 with which I began, lovers in particular, are susceptible to become very bad poets.

365
00:39:25,230 --> 00:39:30,320
When Orlando writes his lame poetry on the trees of the forest, Avadon in as you like it.

366
00:39:30,320 --> 00:39:34,010
Touchstone bemoans the very false gallop verses.

367
00:39:34,010 --> 00:39:47,130
And if that was lost in as you like it about what is poetry, what's good poetry touchdown in order to have a sort of rural rustic guide softs.

368
00:39:47,130 --> 00:39:53,100
What's that thing called? Sydney's defensive poetry. Somehow they go through Obledo poetry, pretending and all that stuff.

369
00:39:53,100 --> 00:39:57,990
So they have this. This is a discussion about what poetry is as a reference to Marleau.

370
00:39:57,990 --> 00:40:04,860
So as you like, it is a play very kind of preoccupied with the idea of the poetic.

371
00:40:04,860 --> 00:40:06,630
In Much Ado about Nothing.

372
00:40:06,630 --> 00:40:15,800
A halting sonnet of his own pure brain fashion to Beatrice is the last nail in the coffin of Benedict's claims to be a perpetual bachelor.

373
00:40:15,800 --> 00:40:21,120
It's triumphantly produced by the match makers at the end of the play in Henry the Fifth,

374
00:40:21,120 --> 00:40:29,850
an extravagant and foppish French nobleman is characterised by his desire to write a sonnet to his horse.

375
00:40:29,850 --> 00:40:38,080
So these are all kind of these are all stupid. How laughable attempts at poetry, amateur poetry by people who do something else, really?

376
00:40:38,080 --> 00:40:41,560
What about the actual poet? The poet is vocation, master of sin, assassin.

377
00:40:41,560 --> 00:40:48,120
A sinner doesn't. I write poetry? He says I'm a sinner. The poet we are against the conjunction of the lunatic,

378
00:40:48,120 --> 00:40:53,780
the lover and the poet with which to Theseus Greeks the mechanicals play in Midsummer Night's Dream.

379
00:40:53,780 --> 00:40:55,140
And maybe more promisingly,

380
00:40:55,140 --> 00:41:03,700
a poet is amongst the parasites and hangers on who are looking for philanthropic patronage at time and at the beginning of time in Athens.

381
00:41:03,700 --> 00:41:12,360
And I guess we get the rock. The so-called Leibel poet that one of the more overwrought, imaginary dramatis personae of the sonnets.

382
00:41:12,360 --> 00:41:16,870
So again, searching a good online text like falta digital text.

383
00:41:16,870 --> 00:41:20,460
Stop or throw up this broader context. Give you an idea.

384
00:41:20,460 --> 00:41:29,010
Maybe it works. Look, look. Next, poets and poetry that are not heroic figures in Shakespeare's works are usually, I think, set up for ridicule,

385
00:41:29,010 --> 00:41:37,320
even while the Sonics are explicit and other works are implicit about the power of poetry to move onto memorialised.

386
00:41:37,320 --> 00:41:41,700
But poet figures must be in some way self reflexive.

387
00:41:41,700 --> 00:41:45,930
It's hard to imagine putting the figure of a poet into a written,

388
00:41:45,930 --> 00:41:53,190
dramatic poetry without using it as some kind of commentary, positive or negative, on writing or poetic identity.

389
00:41:53,190 --> 00:42:00,600
How might this broader context help us think about why the victim of the mob is a poet?

390
00:42:00,600 --> 00:42:06,060
If the role of the poet had ever been to be an innocent bystander on the political scene,

391
00:42:06,060 --> 00:42:13,380
it was very hard in 15 nine to maintain that fiction of disengagement.

392
00:42:13,380 --> 00:42:17,820
In my lifetime, as you like it, I talk about the fifteen ninety nine bishops ban.

393
00:42:17,820 --> 00:42:24,570
The bishops found a new piece of Elizabethan legislation that imposed much more fierce and stringent

394
00:42:24,570 --> 00:42:31,800
censorship on printed material and on printed material across some interesting categories.

395
00:42:31,800 --> 00:42:34,930
On history plays and satires in particular,

396
00:42:34,930 --> 00:42:42,780
the bishop finds a fascinating piece of legislation to think about how Licia works were conceived in this period.

397
00:42:42,780 --> 00:42:51,450
So part of the bishop's banter about particular authors Nash, Thomas Nash and Gabriel Harvey's work was banned in toto.

398
00:42:51,450 --> 00:42:56,070
So so the author figure there is the most important thing to be censored.

399
00:42:56,070 --> 00:43:05,100
Particular works named works by satirists including Marston, Gilpin and Hall were were named and English history.

400
00:43:05,100 --> 00:43:09,960
The genre, whether in print or performance, became a genre subject.

401
00:43:09,960 --> 00:43:20,970
Critic Direk Privy Council control to the Bishop's barn, which results in a number of titles being publicly burned in London in June 15.

402
00:43:20,970 --> 00:43:28,470
Ninety nine gives an interesting and much more fraught context for what poetry might do in the political world.

403
00:43:28,470 --> 00:43:35,700
At the point when Shakespeare's writing, Julius Caesar would not only conjecture that the Bishop's band has an impact on Shakespeare's work.

404
00:43:35,700 --> 00:43:43,620
The move to Roman history after a series of nine plays based on English history seems to be a direct response to the

405
00:43:43,620 --> 00:43:50,940
increased surveillance of representations of the mediaeval English past and seems unusually for a Shakespeare play.

406
00:43:50,940 --> 00:43:56,400
They have a pretty close idea of when Julius Caesar was performed. We know that it comes after the bishop's farm.

407
00:43:56,400 --> 00:44:06,390
A Swiss tourist called Thomas Plata saw Julius Caesar at the newly built Globe Theatre towards the end of September 15, 99.

408
00:44:06,390 --> 00:44:08,520
He has disappointingly little to say about it,

409
00:44:08,520 --> 00:44:15,270
except that it was pleasingly performed and that at the end they danced together admirably and exceedingly gracefully,

410
00:44:15,270 --> 00:44:21,190
according to their customs to in each group dressed in men's unto immunity parody.

411
00:44:21,190 --> 00:44:25,890
What's interesting to remember that the apparently final solemnity as the victorious Mark

412
00:44:25,890 --> 00:44:32,930
Antony and Octavius magnanimously arranged the funeral of the Nobilis Roman of the Moor Brutus,

413
00:44:32,930 --> 00:44:36,960
they all just jump up and stop dancing a jig.

414
00:44:36,960 --> 00:44:43,200
The point of Pather assessment is that really what I'm talking about now is that it puts the planned performance after the date of the bishop's ban,

415
00:44:43,200 --> 00:44:45,870
which was in the early summer of fifty nine to nine.

416
00:44:45,870 --> 00:44:53,460
So maybe then we should see this cameo of Sin of the Poet as some sort of gesture towards a new climate of poetic censorship.

417
00:44:53,460 --> 00:45:00,030
The first casualty of the post Caesar regime in the play is a poet or poetry itself,

418
00:45:00,030 --> 00:45:09,550
perhaps just as the play has reached its own poetic heights in the rhetoric overseas as fighting.

419
00:45:09,550 --> 00:45:15,550
Poetry and politics are connected here. Even then, a sinner, the poet, disavows that connexion.

420
00:45:15,550 --> 00:45:19,650
And although the ultimate fate of Rome is decided through military action,

421
00:45:19,650 --> 00:45:24,730
Marc Anthony has already effectively won through rhetoric or through poetry.

422
00:45:24,730 --> 00:45:32,110
Poetry is both the agent then and the victim of Roman political conflict.

423
00:45:32,110 --> 00:45:40,560
So even though the Senate scene is so short, it seems burdened with trying to say something about the role of the poet in political life,

424
00:45:40,560 --> 00:45:45,700
the poet as bystander is brought resistent me into politics.

425
00:45:45,700 --> 00:45:49,770
And in case we missed it, the pope, the play has another go.

426
00:45:49,770 --> 00:45:57,790
At this same suggestion, it has another poet, a figure called with a wonderful, unnecessary mess.

427
00:45:57,790 --> 00:46:04,260
Another poet. If you look at the current list of any edition of the Oxford Edition bio, Arthur Humphries.

428
00:46:04,260 --> 00:46:11,290
But any modern edition has another practical. Another poet. We've already had another sinner.

429
00:46:11,290 --> 00:46:15,130
Now we have another poet. Something that's going a bit wrong in the second half of the play.

430
00:46:15,130 --> 00:46:22,120
I think that's actually quite often the case in the second half of Shakespeare's plays, just as it all unravels Brutus and Cassius.

431
00:46:22,120 --> 00:46:26,700
So it unravels a little bit. Shakespeare. We get two versions of Portia's death.

432
00:46:26,700 --> 00:46:34,180
For instance, we get lots of these echoes of repetitions which arrive in mistakes or kind of ghostly repeats,

433
00:46:34,180 --> 00:46:40,750
depending how you want to interpret them. Something about that repetition idea, though, that tragedy becomes farce.

434
00:46:40,750 --> 00:46:51,190
Is unschooling. And inevitably, for what I've been talking about, one of those repetitions is this random poet poet interrupts Brutus and Cassius,

435
00:46:51,190 --> 00:46:56,800
just at the point when they have reconciled their quarrel in at forcing two.

436
00:46:56,800 --> 00:47:07,240
Unlike Cinner, this poet even shows off his vocation. It's wonderful couplet love and befriends as two such men should be, for I have seen more years,

437
00:47:07,240 --> 00:47:12,930
I'm sure, than we have so many of the bad poems that were meant to see that.

438
00:47:12,930 --> 00:47:19,120
But the bad is a bad poetry and the rhyming couplets stands out really in this play where there are no other couplets.

439
00:47:19,120 --> 00:47:23,500
Cassius laughs that you file rhymes. The poet is banished from the stage.

440
00:47:23,500 --> 00:47:27,340
It's even more random than the sin of the poet element.

441
00:47:27,340 --> 00:47:33,800
What is this poet doing? How are you hanging around this old battle tanks of Brutus and Cassius?

442
00:47:33,800 --> 00:47:39,910
And why does he just come to say something so, so pointless in the sources?

443
00:47:39,910 --> 00:47:44,920
He's a philosopher. You can see the poets and philosophers have some relation.

444
00:47:44,920 --> 00:47:48,310
But to take away the character of philosopher and put in poet instead,

445
00:47:48,310 --> 00:47:54,790
I think somehow does something to emphasise the importance of the poet figure in this play.

446
00:47:54,790 --> 00:47:59,890
So if this another poet is so impotent, why bother to put him there at all?

447
00:47:59,890 --> 00:48:03,110
Poets keep pushing at the door of this play, it seems to me,

448
00:48:03,110 --> 00:48:08,440
and that duplication must be saying something about the role of poetry in a political play.

449
00:48:08,440 --> 00:48:17,800
The poets, like the play soothsayers, are marginal figures whose interventions are at once pointless and weighted with significance.

450
00:48:17,800 --> 00:48:22,660
The role of the poet, then, is at once important and anticlimactic.

451
00:48:22,660 --> 00:48:32,470
The two poets are implicated in and witnesses to political max machinations to which they are also constructed are strangers.

452
00:48:32,470 --> 00:48:39,100
So the definition of a poet seems to me a cameo scene in Julius Caesar that we can best think about in terms of the structure of the whole play,

453
00:48:39,100 --> 00:48:45,580
its rhythms, its echoes and its contrasts in a play which is self consciously about interpretation.

454
00:48:45,580 --> 00:48:53,830
This scene figures a sort of interpretive void that it is important that we identify before or instead of rushing to fill it.

455
00:48:53,830 --> 00:49:00,880
It's something not altogether positive, but insistent about the role of the poet in times of political upheaval that might have

456
00:49:00,880 --> 00:49:09,160
resonated strongly in the immediate aftermath of the bishops banned censorship of 15 99.

457
00:49:09,160 --> 00:49:18,460
Next week I'm going to talk about Love's Labour's Lost. I wish I had already wasted what now seems to be the overarching question for this play.

458
00:49:18,460 --> 00:49:24,290
WTS, you wrote a script, but back in Winter's Tale, which now seems to have been out, the sad bit of a waste.

459
00:49:24,290 --> 00:49:28,570
It would have been a perfect focus book. Love's Labour's Lost by going to try and talk. I think about loss.

460
00:49:28,570 --> 00:49:32,090
What's lost in Love's Labour's Lost. Maybe you'll come back then.

461
00:49:32,090 --> 00:49:33,745
Frankie.