1 00:00:00,270 --> 00:00:02,840 [Auto-generated transcript. Edits may have been applied for clarity.] Hello. I'm the Caroline Harrington, uh, 2 00:00:02,880 --> 00:00:12,480 an emeritus professor of medieval European literature here at the University of Oxford and also an emeritus research fellow at Saint John's College. 3 00:00:18,660 --> 00:00:28,440 I think fantasy is quite a hard thing to define, but what it probably means to me personally is a definition that we had this morning. 4 00:00:28,470 --> 00:00:36,030 It's a world in which impossible things can happen, and that might be magical things, 5 00:00:36,030 --> 00:00:45,840 or it might be the suspension of a particular set of natural laws, or it might just be some strange powers that somebody has. 6 00:00:46,230 --> 00:00:52,770 But it's a world within which when that thing happens, you know, are we not in the normal world? 7 00:00:59,080 --> 00:01:09,459 I think we have to always point to Tolkien here and from Tolkien as a kind of filter for his forerunners. 8 00:01:09,460 --> 00:01:12,820 So a filter through which nobody reads William Morris today. 9 00:01:12,820 --> 00:01:16,960 But people think about Morris because Tolkien liked Morris. 10 00:01:17,500 --> 00:01:22,990 Um, the same is probably too true of George MacDonald, except his children's stories. 11 00:01:23,320 --> 00:01:30,580 So it's Tolkien. And then I think going forward from Tolkien, you get this branching into all kinds of different subgenres. 12 00:01:31,180 --> 00:01:43,540 And so after Tolkien and Lewis, to some extent, we have the, the kind of work of someone like George Martin or we have China, marvel's urban fantasy, 13 00:01:43,840 --> 00:01:55,060 or we have the kind of Angela Carter feminist fairy tales, um, we have aspires very thoughtful meditation on fairy tale in, um, possession. 14 00:01:55,810 --> 00:02:05,770 So I think that's a kind of spectres from the fairy tale and fantasy world that comes in some ways out of medieval romance, 15 00:02:05,770 --> 00:02:10,300 and Tolkien is certainly a kind of passage through that, 16 00:02:10,570 --> 00:02:21,100 but also these darker kinds of fantasy which are linked both to dystopia and come out of of that kind of 17 00:02:21,280 --> 00:02:28,120 early 20th century Orwellian thinking about how much worse that the state of the world could become. 18 00:02:28,720 --> 00:02:34,959 And before that, I think chronicle in the medieval period where what happens, 19 00:02:34,960 --> 00:02:40,510 what's related is a series of terrible events, deaths, the fates of kings, and so on. 20 00:02:46,120 --> 00:02:52,930 I have recently been reading Samantha Shannon's, Um, The Priory, The Orange Tree, which I very much enjoyed. 21 00:02:52,960 --> 00:03:00,220 I've been writing a book about dragons, and this has both eastern and Western dragons in it, so that was quite exciting. 22 00:03:00,550 --> 00:03:11,560 But something I found myself returning to again and again is Sylvia Townsend Warner's Tales of Elphin, which are wonderfully funny. 23 00:03:12,040 --> 00:03:16,239 Also, in some ways they have a satirical edge to them. 24 00:03:16,240 --> 00:03:19,840 They tell us a lot about human nature, even though they're about fairies, 25 00:03:20,440 --> 00:03:30,580 and they're absolutely steeped in fairy law and the ways in which Warner writes in the 1970s and 80s, 26 00:03:30,970 --> 00:03:34,630 these tales, which are kind of timeless and their implications. 27 00:03:35,200 --> 00:03:41,590 It means I keep it on my phone so I can always read this in an emergency, and if I have nothing else on me to read. 28 00:03:47,170 --> 00:03:55,569 I think originally and by originally, I think perhaps we mean the 19th century here when we have people like Morris, 29 00:03:55,570 --> 00:04:01,480 we have our theory and literature, and we have the speculative stuff that people like George MacDonald were writing. 30 00:04:02,350 --> 00:04:10,690 That was, in a way, an attempt to keep fantasy adult in the face of fairies, for example, 31 00:04:10,690 --> 00:04:18,310 becoming the stuff of children's stories because they were little and pretty and cute and rather like little girls. 32 00:04:18,910 --> 00:04:27,750 Ideal Victorian little girl, sort of unthreatening. And so fairy tales and stories about fairies became the province of children. 33 00:04:27,750 --> 00:04:31,629 And I think this has to do with ideas about disenchantment, 34 00:04:31,630 --> 00:04:39,130 that grownups couldn't believe in fairies anymore and couldn't believe in this sort of hidden, unseen world. 35 00:04:40,060 --> 00:04:50,590 And then somehow, in the 20s, we have, perhaps in the wake of the the First World War, a recurrence of the idea that there may be other possibilities. 36 00:04:50,590 --> 00:04:58,780 Again, this may be the kind of utopia, dystopia distinction, and suddenly fantasy becomes something that adults. 37 00:04:59,740 --> 00:05:06,190 Are reading again. They're being invited to read by people who are writing in in that particular genre. 38 00:05:06,730 --> 00:05:10,470 So I think now the target audience is no longer children. 39 00:05:10,480 --> 00:05:18,490 It's young adults shading into adults and sometimes very adult indeed. 40 00:05:18,520 --> 00:05:23,139 In some ways that quite a lot of very contemporary fantasy. 41 00:05:23,140 --> 00:05:31,450 You might think of romance, you might think of some of the very cool material is definitely not for the kind of 12 to 14 year old market. 42 00:05:31,900 --> 00:05:36,940 So I think it's it's gone through a phase where it was discussed for children, 43 00:05:37,150 --> 00:05:41,620 but is definitively broken out of that, certainly since the Second World War. 44 00:05:47,380 --> 00:05:58,780 That's a difficult question to answer. I think, um, in some ways, there's something about the classic status of The Hobbit and The Hobbit, 45 00:05:58,780 --> 00:06:04,510 only, I think achieved that in retrospect after the Lord of the rings became so big. 46 00:06:04,930 --> 00:06:10,239 And you can see there's a very different tone in The Hobbit that Tolkien is writing for children. 47 00:06:10,240 --> 00:06:16,180 Writing, writing down, in a sense. Um, so I think it doesn't have to do with authorial intention. 48 00:06:16,180 --> 00:06:24,579 Particularly, the author is imagining a world in which he's explaining sometimes things that children and adults don't mind that, 49 00:06:24,580 --> 00:06:27,700 particularly if there's not too much of it. Um, 50 00:06:27,700 --> 00:06:35,919 so I think fantasy is a genre in which kinds of storytelling can migrate backwards 51 00:06:35,920 --> 00:06:40,659 and forwards between children writing for children and writing for adults. 52 00:06:40,660 --> 00:06:47,380 And sometimes. Yeah, Harry Potter, I think, would be a case in point that JK Rowling was writing for children. 53 00:06:48,330 --> 00:06:51,660 And perhaps it's primarily children who still read for a living. 54 00:06:52,080 --> 00:06:58,440 But they're adults who keep returning to it, and sometimes that's a kind of nostalgia for their own childhood. 55 00:06:59,400 --> 00:07:02,100 So I think it's it's hard to generalise, 56 00:07:02,550 --> 00:07:09,060 but different stories within the genre appeal to different kinds of audiences at different times in their lives. 57 00:07:14,840 --> 00:07:25,760 I think I would like to say something about Arthurian fantasy, maybe because Gabriel talked very interestingly about Once and Future King, 58 00:07:26,360 --> 00:07:37,009 and suggested that in some ways, the playfulness with which it was writing was in contrast to some other Arthurian stories. 59 00:07:37,010 --> 00:07:43,520 And he mentioned Marion Zimmer Bradley, for example, and said that they were more historical and less fantastical. 60 00:07:44,060 --> 00:07:55,280 And in some ways, I think it's true that there's a stronger sense of of historical place and a lot of research in Mists of Babylon, for example. 61 00:07:55,700 --> 00:08:04,790 But there's also quite a lot more the fantastic and the magical and the mystical in particular in, um, The Mists of Babylon. 62 00:08:04,790 --> 00:08:11,869 So I think it's more fantasy adjacent than people maybe thought of at the time. 63 00:08:11,870 --> 00:08:16,010 In 1982, I thought it was a feminist retelling of the story of King Arthur. 64 00:08:16,520 --> 00:08:22,610 And I think now looking at that again, we might see that it have more in common with fantasy, 65 00:08:22,610 --> 00:08:30,110 particularly as a kind of rather startling bit in the middle where it suddenly starts talking about Atlantis and you think, 66 00:08:30,110 --> 00:08:33,590 oh, okay, that's a real generic shift here. 67 00:08:34,340 --> 00:08:45,079 So I think I would I would want to respond to that in the sense that we might think of books as being of a certain type when they're first published, 68 00:08:45,080 --> 00:08:51,080 and we see the reviews, and then when we come back to them after a number of years, we think, oh, well, 69 00:08:51,350 --> 00:08:58,009 maybe, as I said earlier, fantasy is a huge category and it's capacious. 70 00:08:58,010 --> 00:09:01,430 You can get a lot of things into it and its boundaries are fuzzy. 71 00:09:01,640 --> 00:09:04,550 And I think that's something that's going to be important for us to remember.