1
00:00:10,400 --> 00:00:16,640
Hello and welcome to the OHP African and South Asian music series.

2
00:00:16,640 --> 00:00:20,870
Please join us to let everyone think is right about the bodies of these African

3
00:00:20,870 --> 00:00:27,640
and South Asian recipes and the values and education of our government.

4
00:00:27,640 --> 00:00:32,420
The ones in 10 to 11 May 2021, together,

5
00:00:32,420 --> 00:00:39,840
we as students begin to acquire our traditions and studied engineering your in this institutions

6
00:00:39,840 --> 00:00:47,660
by investigating institutions and the way our traditions present these philosophies and beyond,

7
00:00:47,660 --> 00:00:55,910
we intend to participate ameliorating deficits in representation and resources required to transform our lives.

8
00:00:55,910 --> 00:01:09,240
Obsession was snatched at ethically. Hi, I'm Scarlett.

9
00:01:09,240 --> 00:01:13,790
A future Afghan study student here at the University of Oxford.

10
00:01:13,790 --> 00:01:18,750
And today I'm joined by my co-host, Cate, who's a fan of philosophy graduate.

11
00:01:18,750 --> 00:01:25,740
And our two guests, said Honourable C. and Professor Frederick A. Jan Hamblin.

12
00:01:25,740 --> 00:01:33,180
So this episode is here to introduce listeners to some of the themes of our book on the philosophy.

13
00:01:33,180 --> 00:01:39,840
And also to prepare them for engagement with Oxford public philosophies second time.

14
00:01:39,840 --> 00:01:43,380
So as an introduction to the discipline,

15
00:01:43,380 --> 00:01:55,410
we first want to raise and ultimately dispel some common metaphor philosophical concerns about Afrikaner discourses.

16
00:01:55,410 --> 00:02:03,180
And also consider some epistemic differences between the African and the European traditions.

17
00:02:03,180 --> 00:02:09,630
And then diving into some approaches to particular philosophical traditions.

18
00:02:09,630 --> 00:02:15,610
Professor Ochieng talks to us about Kenyan philosopher. Two Ruka.

19
00:02:15,610 --> 00:02:26,640
So that's his concept of philosophic sagacity and also his broader aim of developing a truly authentic national culture,

20
00:02:26,640 --> 00:02:35,490
which he saw as operating to protect Kenya from harmful foreign practises and ideas.

21
00:02:35,490 --> 00:02:49,140
And to unpack this idea of authentic national culture, we then bring a report into conversation with cultural philosopher Amica Bro.

22
00:02:49,140 --> 00:03:02,220
So Cabral rudely endorsed an empty essentialist, historic sized conception of culture, and he saw cultural liberation.

23
00:03:02,220 --> 00:03:12,320
I'm very much in terms of cultural autonomy as opposed to the preservation of indigenous cultures.

24
00:03:12,320 --> 00:03:21,020
That provides us with a really useful distinction between cultural influence and cultural domination,

25
00:03:21,020 --> 00:03:30,560
which we then apply to some common discussions about tradition and also cultural development in Africa.

26
00:03:30,560 --> 00:03:37,290
I'd like to thank Ziad and Professor Ochieng for joining us today, and I hope you enjoy.

27
00:03:37,290 --> 00:03:42,350
So Frederick and Z, could each of you introduce yourselves, please?

28
00:03:42,350 --> 00:03:56,840
All right. If I may go first. All right. So I'm a Kenyan by ancestry, born a couple of years before Kenya gained its political independence.

29
00:03:56,840 --> 00:04:04,280
I earned my Ph.D. in philosophy from the University of Nairobi in Kenya,

30
00:04:04,280 --> 00:04:15,980
having undertaken research and written a thesis in the area of African philosophy with focus on philosophic sagacity.

31
00:04:15,980 --> 00:04:23,330
Now, the main supervisor of my thesis was Professor Henry Ordera Roca,

32
00:04:23,330 --> 00:04:31,670
a renowned scholar in African philosophy and considered to be the father of sage philosophy.

33
00:04:31,670 --> 00:04:36,830
I was employed as a graduate assistant in the Department of Philosophy,

34
00:04:36,830 --> 00:04:47,270
University of Nairobi in 1985 and rose through the ranks of a tutorial, fellow lecturer,

35
00:04:47,270 --> 00:05:01,130
senior lecturer in the same institution in the year 2010, or I relocated to the southern African nation of Lesotho,

36
00:05:01,130 --> 00:05:07,910
joining the Department of Philosophy there at the National University of Listento.

37
00:05:07,910 --> 00:05:20,280
In 20 03, I moved over to the Caribbean island of Barbados and joined the Department of History and Philosophy at the Kenyan campus,

38
00:05:20,280 --> 00:05:26,090
the University of the West Indies in 20 or nine.

39
00:05:26,090 --> 00:05:35,540
I was appointed head of the department, a position I held until 2015.

40
00:05:35,540 --> 00:05:46,580
I served as deputy dean planning in 2015, 2016 and 2016 2017 academic year.

41
00:05:46,580 --> 00:05:53,460
Currently, the dean of the faculty, having been appointed in 2019.

42
00:05:53,460 --> 00:06:04,700
Now, besides African philosophy, my other research interests include social and moral philosophy, as well as logic.

43
00:06:04,700 --> 00:06:16,460
These are areas in which I have numerous publications, which consist of texts, essays, book chapters and book reviews.

44
00:06:16,460 --> 00:06:27,380
I think that more or less captures who I am. Ziad, yeah, so I just want to begin by thanking us, thanking you for inviting us,

45
00:06:27,380 --> 00:06:31,670
and it's a great honour to be on the same panel with professor watching.

46
00:06:31,670 --> 00:06:38,120
And obviously, I don't have the illustrious pedigree that professor I think has.

47
00:06:38,120 --> 00:06:47,780
So I'm a student working on modern African philosophy at Cornell University in the Department of Africana Studies.

48
00:06:47,780 --> 00:06:55,970
So my main areas of interest are the history of modern African philosophy.

49
00:06:55,970 --> 00:07:05,430
Specifically, I'm interested in philosophy of culture and also questions about the place of science and wonder in African cultures.

50
00:07:05,430 --> 00:07:13,770
I'm also interested in the place of North African philosophy in African philosophy because I'm originally from Egypt,

51
00:07:13,770 --> 00:07:19,140
so I have a personal interest in that and obviously also an ancient Egyptian

52
00:07:19,140 --> 00:07:26,280
philosophy and the way it gets deployed in and we can call modern African philosophy.

53
00:07:26,280 --> 00:07:31,660
Yeah, yeah. So I think that suffices as well. Thank you.

54
00:07:31,660 --> 00:07:37,000
Thank you. It is a pleasure to be with you. Before I hand over to Scarlett,

55
00:07:37,000 --> 00:07:43,810
I wonder if watching could you give us a short introduction into the sort of

56
00:07:43,810 --> 00:07:48,910
movements of African philosophy as this trio that often comes up ethno philosophy,

57
00:07:48,910 --> 00:08:02,010
professional and philosophic sagacity? And then maybe Z, I might ask you to give us a short introduction on Kabras work because in a way or Cheng,

58
00:08:02,010 --> 00:08:11,090
you're partly representing or they're a Ruka, and that you are representing Kimbrough, though you're both philosophers in your own right.

59
00:08:11,090 --> 00:08:15,200
Yes, all right, thank you. Right? Oh, actually, no.

60
00:08:15,200 --> 00:08:27,470
In the area of African philosophy, I think Professor Henry de Rocha, who, as I said, was my main supervisor of my thesis, right?

61
00:08:27,470 --> 00:08:43,850
Sometime in the 1970s, late seventies actually identified four trends or if you like four approaches to African philosophy and these were,

62
00:08:43,850 --> 00:08:56,510
if not philosophy, nationalist ideological philosophy, professional philosophy and then philosophic sagacity.

63
00:08:56,510 --> 00:09:06,490
In his view, he said that any discourse in African philosophy could locate in either one of those four categories.

64
00:09:06,490 --> 00:09:16,640
What now? Of course, prior to that, the debate had been whether African philosophy exists or not, right?

65
00:09:16,640 --> 00:09:23,390
Prior to that, I think right up to. Well, one can say right up to 1945,

66
00:09:23,390 --> 00:09:30,530
the publication of Placid Tempo's book Born to Philosophy is the one which changed the whole

67
00:09:30,530 --> 00:09:38,570
scenario because he came up and said that there is what you may call African philosophy.

68
00:09:38,570 --> 00:09:49,880
It exists, right? So therefore, after 1945, several scholars started interrogating what temple's that said,

69
00:09:49,880 --> 00:09:57,470
all right and out of that interrogation, emerge the school of if no philosophy.

70
00:09:57,470 --> 00:10:09,650
All right. Well, it's Paulinho and Tunji, another professional African philosopher who in a way popularised the terminology of ethical philosophy.

71
00:10:09,650 --> 00:10:13,190
Some people credit for having coined it,

72
00:10:13,190 --> 00:10:23,930
but it's not really true because Kwame Nkrumah actually in the 1940s and 50s, had used that term ethical philosophy.

73
00:10:23,930 --> 00:10:32,000
Right. So in essence, the philosophy of the position is that African philosophy is a lived philosophy.

74
00:10:32,000 --> 00:10:36,860
It is a communal philosophy. It's a philosophy of everyone.

75
00:10:36,860 --> 00:10:51,320
What a professional school does not quite agree with that right for them, for anything to pass as philosophy, whether African or oriental or western.

76
00:10:51,320 --> 00:11:00,230
It must be critical. It must involve critical, independent, objective analysis.

77
00:11:00,230 --> 00:11:04,700
So they do not think highly of the philosophy.

78
00:11:04,700 --> 00:11:13,250
All right. And then there are those who saw philosophy from the political standpoint.

79
00:11:13,250 --> 00:11:17,540
So hence the nationalist ideological philosophy.

80
00:11:17,540 --> 00:11:23,780
All right. So here you have, you know, the founding fathers, political fathers of Africa, right?

81
00:11:23,780 --> 00:11:27,680
Kwame Nkrumah, Julius Nyerere, etc., etc.

82
00:11:27,680 --> 00:11:31,520
Look it very well in that trend now.

83
00:11:31,520 --> 00:11:39,140
The basic essence of that trend is that Africa.

84
00:11:39,140 --> 00:11:51,800
Liberation of the African nation state will not be truly rehabilitated unless they revert back to the communal spirit of traditional Africa.

85
00:11:51,800 --> 00:11:58,850
All right, word for them was the route which one would take, though of course there are differences amongst themselves.

86
00:11:58,850 --> 00:12:04,400
Kwame Nkrumah in your area, there are differences, but generally that was the position.

87
00:12:04,400 --> 00:12:12,020
And then there was philosophic sagacity, which is generally attributed to Adero Ruka.

88
00:12:12,020 --> 00:12:17,930
His position was that you see the professional school, for instance,

89
00:12:17,930 --> 00:12:28,730
seem to ignore traditional Africa because for them, the rubbish, so to speak, if not philosophy and traditional Africa.

90
00:12:28,730 --> 00:12:33,380
They thought that traditional Africa was too communal stick.

91
00:12:33,380 --> 00:12:37,580
It could not be philosophical, but daring.

92
00:12:37,580 --> 00:12:40,820
Is transit, not even in traditional Africa.

93
00:12:40,820 --> 00:12:53,750
We have these sages, right, who are capable of critical independent thinking, despite the fact that they are not schooled in the Western tradition,

94
00:12:53,750 --> 00:12:59,070
despite the fact that they are not professionally trained philosophers,

95
00:12:59,070 --> 00:13:06,890
but they are just as critical in the report as the professionally trained philosophers.

96
00:13:06,890 --> 00:13:16,970
So those were the four approaches which Odetta identified, and according to him, all of them fall within African philosophy.

97
00:13:16,970 --> 00:13:23,840
So if so, you can approach Africa in philosophy as philosophically through sage philosophy,

98
00:13:23,840 --> 00:13:28,520
through nationalist ideological philosophy or through professional philosophy.

99
00:13:28,520 --> 00:13:44,140
So in other words, he did not discriminate. All right. You said all those are approaches which one could approach the study of African philosophy.

100
00:13:44,140 --> 00:13:57,070
So with respect to spectacle, so to to to connect it to the kind of taxonomy that Professor Cheng has just provided, stroke is sometimes subsumed,

101
00:13:57,070 --> 00:14:04,960
subsumed under the category of nationalist ideological philosophy because of course he is, you know, a political figure.

102
00:14:04,960 --> 00:14:10,870
So to give people a kind of brief overview of the girls life.

103
00:14:10,870 --> 00:14:19,030
So Amilcar Cabral was born in 1924 and he was assassinated in 1973.

104
00:14:19,030 --> 00:14:21,250
He was the leader of the liberation struggle,

105
00:14:21,250 --> 00:14:29,410
which culminated in the overthrow of Portuguese colonialism and the independence and unification of Guinea-Bissau and Cape Verde,

106
00:14:29,410 --> 00:14:37,150
which were Portuguese colonies. So Cabral was was a key figure in founding the IGC,

107
00:14:37,150 --> 00:14:43,330
the party which which led the liberation struggle in 1956 and essentially led this

108
00:14:43,330 --> 00:14:51,190
party until his assassination by agents associate with the Portuguese colonial state.

109
00:14:51,190 --> 00:15:02,190
Sukumaran This is interesting precisely because if you look at the context of the Portuguese colonies, the Portuguese colonies.

110
00:15:02,190 --> 00:15:06,060
The struggle for independence takes place fairly late,

111
00:15:06,060 --> 00:15:16,370
so there is a sense in which people like Amilcar Cabral are reacting to what they think to be the limitations of earlier independence struggle.

112
00:15:16,370 --> 00:15:24,510
So Cabral has this speech, for example, in the aftermath of the overthrow of the overthrowing of communism in 1965.

113
00:15:24,510 --> 00:15:31,070
Cabral gives the speech what he tries to sort of analyse, OK, or what's that to this?

114
00:15:31,070 --> 00:15:43,220
What led to this development? And he he seems to think that it has to do with a problem of ideological inadequacy or underdevelopment.

115
00:15:43,220 --> 00:15:47,600
And obviously, Cabral never thought of himself as a professional philosopher.

116
00:15:47,600 --> 00:15:55,010
So that's really important. I mean, he never calls himself a philosopher, but it doesn't follow from this that we cannot extract as a word,

117
00:15:55,010 --> 00:16:02,360
you know, a clear philosophical orientation in his writing, which is sort of what I've been trying to do.

118
00:16:02,360 --> 00:16:08,450
And the other thing to note is with respect to the question of communalism.

119
00:16:08,450 --> 00:16:19,760
Cabral, for example, unlike Julius Nyerere, he interned in Tanzania or unlike Leopold single or coming across as well.

120
00:16:19,760 --> 00:16:27,770
He he he was sort of, you don't really see him make references to communalism, so he's interesting and differing in that manner.

121
00:16:27,770 --> 00:16:34,490
When Cabral, one characteristic think about his thought is that he was sort of averse to being labelled.

122
00:16:34,490 --> 00:16:38,990
You know, there is definitely a clear, for example, Marxist influence on his writings.

123
00:16:38,990 --> 00:16:45,860
But yet he does not really call himself a Marxist, so he's obviously influenced by Kwame Nkrumah.

124
00:16:45,860 --> 00:16:47,750
And even when he criticises, you don't see.

125
00:16:47,750 --> 00:16:54,260
So he sometimes indirectly criticises people like saying he never mentions them by name because he's also a diplomat or he needs.

126
00:16:54,260 --> 00:16:58,670
He needs support, and he doesn't want to antagonise people unnecessarily.

127
00:16:58,670 --> 00:17:05,030
And one of the things that Cabral is really interested in thinking about is what kind of cultural

128
00:17:05,030 --> 00:17:11,060
elements contribute to the success of the liberation struggle and to the building of just,

129
00:17:11,060 --> 00:17:16,100
you know, post-colonial society, independent post-colonial society.

130
00:17:16,100 --> 00:17:21,470
So I leave it at the. Thank you.

131
00:17:21,470 --> 00:17:29,090
I'd like to pass over to Scarlett, sort of raise and dispel some concerns about whether African philosophy is an oxymoron.

132
00:17:29,090 --> 00:17:34,910
Or rather tell us why it is now. Hello. Thank you so much, guys, for being here.

133
00:17:34,910 --> 00:17:39,740
And as Cage said, we're almost going backwards a little now.

134
00:17:39,740 --> 00:17:45,270
This podcast series is supposed to be an introduction to the Philosophy Journal.

135
00:17:45,270 --> 00:17:49,340
Oxford Public Philosophy. And then you issue coming out.

136
00:17:49,340 --> 00:17:56,390
So lots of people listening to this podcast might necessarily not necessarily know that much about African philosophy,

137
00:17:56,390 --> 00:18:02,480
and that's what we want to meet them where they are at right now.

138
00:18:02,480 --> 00:18:07,250
So I am just starting my academic journey.

139
00:18:07,250 --> 00:18:17,690
I'm doing a master's in African Studies at Oxford next year, and all my tutors talked about undergrad was the danger of a centralising Africa.

140
00:18:17,690 --> 00:18:18,920
They slammed it down our throats.

141
00:18:18,920 --> 00:18:30,160
And this is, I think, led to the potentially rather crude metal philosophical question of whether we can even talk about an Afrikaner philosophy.

142
00:18:30,160 --> 00:18:35,300
I've watched lots of other podcasts and tends to be the question which is up first.

143
00:18:35,300 --> 00:18:38,000
And the concern, I guess, is, you know,

144
00:18:38,000 --> 00:18:46,340
are there enough similarities between the philosophical ideas that have just been spelled out in your great productions and enough

145
00:18:46,340 --> 00:18:53,540
similarities between these cultural practises across the continent to meaningfully talk about distinctly African philosophy?

146
00:18:53,540 --> 00:18:58,430
And obviously had this concern dispelled in quite a few different ways.

147
00:18:58,430 --> 00:19:05,600
But I was wondering how you two would go about it and thought maybe we could start with Professor Young broadly,

148
00:19:05,600 --> 00:19:08,930
you know, why are we generally concerned about this centralisation of Africa?

149
00:19:08,930 --> 00:19:19,580
Why is that a concern that we have and how do we stop this concern leading us into questioning the existence of an African philosophy itself?

150
00:19:19,580 --> 00:19:23,840
All right, thank you. Thank you. That's really broad.

151
00:19:23,840 --> 00:19:27,530
OK, but I'll try my best and address it. All right.

152
00:19:27,530 --> 00:19:32,390
So a quick word about essentialism right now.

153
00:19:32,390 --> 00:19:38,390
Essentialism is the view that objects have a set.

154
00:19:38,390 --> 00:19:50,260
Of attributes that are necessary. For the identity, in other words, it is the view that some properties of objects are essential to them, right?

155
00:19:50,260 --> 00:19:58,210
So the concept of an essential property is closely related to the concept of necessity.

156
00:19:58,210 --> 00:20:09,850
Seems to assert that a property is essential to an object is to say that the object necessarily holds that property.

157
00:20:09,850 --> 00:20:13,480
The property is essential in a way.

158
00:20:13,480 --> 00:20:21,670
Properties of an object that are not essential in this sense are said to be accidental.

159
00:20:21,670 --> 00:20:37,450
No, the question of essentials in Africa has been a dominant theme in the Western anthropological circles, though not unique to those circles.

160
00:20:37,450 --> 00:20:50,920
You say Africa has been portrayed as a different other, not just other, but a different other Western philosophy or European philosophy.

161
00:20:50,920 --> 00:20:55,030
According to historian,

162
00:20:55,030 --> 00:21:01,840
he was a historian from Democratic Republic of Congo by the name of one by de Wamba

163
00:21:01,840 --> 00:21:12,530
argued that you see European philosophy essentially theorises that a difference,

164
00:21:12,530 --> 00:21:18,040
right? But not a positive, either.

165
00:21:18,040 --> 00:21:22,180
But Africa is seen as a different either.

166
00:21:22,180 --> 00:21:27,020
It is seen as a target coloniser with target.

167
00:21:27,020 --> 00:21:31,420
All right. So according to one idea, one by European philosophy.

168
00:21:31,420 --> 00:21:39,490
From that point of view has been a philosophy of peripheral vision that is terminology.

169
00:21:39,490 --> 00:21:43,540
And according to him, that has been the tragedy.

170
00:21:43,540 --> 00:21:51,340
It has been most unfortunate. No. In response to that, right?

171
00:21:51,340 --> 00:21:59,560
Some Africans and African scholars also have ended up essentially using Africa.

172
00:21:59,560 --> 00:22:04,330
All right. Ironically, right, they've ended up socialising Africa.

173
00:22:04,330 --> 00:22:17,440
We ended up portraying Africa as having some essential attribute that are unique to it and punctuates it from Europe.

174
00:22:17,440 --> 00:22:29,440
This was basically a position that was advanced by the ethnological, if not philosophical, approach to African philosophy.

175
00:22:29,440 --> 00:22:41,650
All right. The professional school that is the professional trend in African philosophy was actually opposed to ethno philosophical standpoint.

176
00:22:41,650 --> 00:22:49,420
The professional school is basically against Assange, essentially saying Africa.

177
00:22:49,420 --> 00:22:59,140
They do not want to draw a deep and clear line of divide between European philosophy and African philosophy.

178
00:22:59,140 --> 00:23:07,030
The difference between the two philosophies, according to them, is accidental is not essential.

179
00:23:07,030 --> 00:23:14,980
So essential ization of Africa has in a way led to the view or given the impression

180
00:23:14,980 --> 00:23:23,290
that Africa is unitary in terms of its cultural and political practises.

181
00:23:23,290 --> 00:23:27,400
But nothing could be further from the truth.

182
00:23:27,400 --> 00:23:33,460
Some would say Africa is actually a land of diversity.

183
00:23:33,460 --> 00:23:44,080
In fact, in some quarters, Africa is arguably regarded as the most diverse continent in the world,

184
00:23:44,080 --> 00:23:52,610
not just in terms of topography, but also linguistically, culturally and even politically.

185
00:23:52,610 --> 00:24:05,530
So, and in fact, even recent studies also have it that the African continent has the highest level of genetic diversity in the world right now.

186
00:24:05,530 --> 00:24:16,360
However, despite the diversity, there is something I think which runs through Africa, at least in traditional Africa.

187
00:24:16,360 --> 00:24:27,520
This, in my view, is often argued, is the communal spirit or reflection most practises in traditional Africa.

188
00:24:27,520 --> 00:24:35,680
Cultural, political, economic could be explained in terms of the communal spirit.

189
00:24:35,680 --> 00:24:40,270
They are a reflection, one would say, of the communal spirit.

190
00:24:40,270 --> 00:24:51,760
This is, for instance, what is called Oborne two in southern Africa or two in Kiswahili in central East Africa.

191
00:24:51,760 --> 00:24:59,860
John Beattie condenses the communal spirit very admirably well in a catch phrase.

192
00:24:59,860 --> 00:25:08,530
He says the underpinning of it is I am because we are unseen since we are.

193
00:25:08,530 --> 00:25:16,270
Therefore, I am saying now that it is the we which gives meaning to the I.

194
00:25:16,270 --> 00:25:16,990
All right.

195
00:25:16,990 --> 00:25:30,620
So some scholars have decried the fact that the communal spirit rampant in traditional Africa seemed to have given very little consideration.

196
00:25:30,620 --> 00:25:38,750
Given very little consideration in modern Africa, you know, that modern Africa has embraced,

197
00:25:38,750 --> 00:25:46,520
you know, the individualistic spirit I've experienced of the criminalistics spirit.

198
00:25:46,520 --> 00:26:00,440
So when you read professor of African philosophers like quasi well-to-do and Polycarp Equiano, that is the position they take.

199
00:26:00,440 --> 00:26:15,290
No, despite what I'm saying about colonialism in traditional Africa, I never wish to be seen as essentially in Africa.

200
00:26:15,290 --> 00:26:26,720
But the communal spirit isn't that the communal spirit is essential and a unique characteristic to Africa and Africa alone.

201
00:26:26,720 --> 00:26:36,560
No. In fact, there are some good pieces writings which made efforts to ensure that some African practises,

202
00:26:36,560 --> 00:26:41,060
even in traditional Africa, were not communistic, right?

203
00:26:41,060 --> 00:26:52,850
So, for example, that explains the true faces, so to speak of the faults in, for instance, Kwame Nkrumah or Julius Nyerere, right?

204
00:26:52,850 --> 00:27:01,250
At some point, they realise that no communalism is not a unique characteristic of Africa.

205
00:27:01,250 --> 00:27:05,180
In fact, there is also another call I think the name is Henry.

206
00:27:05,180 --> 00:27:14,900
Maria actually argues the same, but no, no actually flushes of individualism, even in traditional Africa.

207
00:27:14,900 --> 00:27:27,260
So I always try to move away. Despite the fact that I emphasise on the communal spirit in Africa, I never want to see it as uniquely Africa.

208
00:27:27,260 --> 00:27:32,420
That traditional Africa is all and all.

209
00:27:32,420 --> 00:27:42,770
There are places or individuals. I'll stop there for Ziad to add or subtract.

210
00:27:42,770 --> 00:27:47,700
Thank you so much. Yeah. Do you have any additions to that?

211
00:27:47,700 --> 00:27:54,450
Would you say that this kind of communal spirit is allows us to talk about an kind philosophy?

212
00:27:54,450 --> 00:28:01,370
Is that something which, you know, runs across all these different philosophical traditions?

213
00:28:01,370 --> 00:28:07,790
Yes. Thank you so much. So to follow up on what Professor Cheng was saying, so I think, yeah,

214
00:28:07,790 --> 00:28:13,370
the point I'll reiterate is I think he drew a very important distinction between the

215
00:28:13,370 --> 00:28:17,660
question of the existence of an African philosophy and the question of uniqueness,

216
00:28:17,660 --> 00:28:19,520
because I think that's really important.

217
00:28:19,520 --> 00:28:28,690
And you see people who who really emphasise this, like the Ghanaian philosopher who was close to Nkrumah William Abraham.

218
00:28:28,690 --> 00:28:34,600
Who who writes, I think, you know this this sort of also captures what a professor was saying.

219
00:28:34,600 --> 00:28:41,320
You know, the question of the existence of an African philosophy is there's not a uniqueness question because

220
00:28:41,320 --> 00:28:49,960
you could think even if one takes communalism to be predominant element in African philosophy,

221
00:28:49,960 --> 00:28:56,710
we could also think of examples in other parts of the world, or communalism is very significant.

222
00:28:56,710 --> 00:29:01,090
So you could think of, you know, maybe. And I don't know. I don't know about this context.

223
00:29:01,090 --> 00:29:07,730
But just to give an example in sort of Thailand or any any other place, right?

224
00:29:07,730 --> 00:29:13,580
That could be that. Again, communalism is significant there.

225
00:29:13,580 --> 00:29:16,190
And the question I'm interested in is,

226
00:29:16,190 --> 00:29:23,930
how do we because professor watching me the really important point about how do we identify this as a significant trend while also understanding

227
00:29:23,930 --> 00:29:33,320
that we don't we don't mean to essentially and I think one way to do this is to look at the conditions which know the kind of historical,

228
00:29:33,320 --> 00:29:42,350
social, political and economic conditions. Would you give rise to communalism as a kind of intellectual orientation and to see how what sort of

229
00:29:42,350 --> 00:29:50,990
changes in these conditions lead to changes in the philosophical orientations of different peoples?

230
00:29:50,990 --> 00:29:57,720
Because obviously, if we look at Professor Cheng was just talking about the diversity of the African continent,

231
00:29:57,720 --> 00:30:04,280
we could also note, you know, the the the kind of diversity at the level of history.

232
00:30:04,280 --> 00:30:13,660
Even so, according to to to some economic and social historians, if you look at.

233
00:30:13,660 --> 00:30:19,720
The sort of big West African empires in the mediaeval period, so Mali and so on.

234
00:30:19,720 --> 00:30:24,610
There were processes there and this is something that Gabriel hadn't. Hence, you know,

235
00:30:24,610 --> 00:30:29,620
the kind of village community was subjected to tremendous pressure because there

236
00:30:29,620 --> 00:30:35,860
was this sort of tributary state power that was imposing certain pressures on it,

237
00:30:35,860 --> 00:30:45,310
which led to a process of change and transformation. So I think we have to also look at different social dynamics that would be a way,

238
00:30:45,310 --> 00:30:53,620
I think that allows us to identify certain properties while also keeping in mind the history and the fact that there are these social processes.

239
00:30:53,620 --> 00:31:04,480
And to return to very quickly about Scarlett's point, about, OK, so why are we worrying about the question of the sense essentialism?

240
00:31:04,480 --> 00:31:09,100
Because I think if you look at that from a political standpoint,

241
00:31:09,100 --> 00:31:15,340
and this was the clear motivation as well and the kind of the critique of the professor in the school of ethno philosophers,

242
00:31:15,340 --> 00:31:18,940
especially in parliament, on this critical, he had political bodies, he said.

243
00:31:18,940 --> 00:31:25,900
Look, if you see, having this sort of views is necessary, for example, to be an African philosopher,

244
00:31:25,900 --> 00:31:35,770
then you can see how this could be used to sort of pressure different people to prevent them from expressing their views and so on.

245
00:31:35,770 --> 00:31:41,000
I'll stop there. Thank you. Thank you so much, both of you.

246
00:31:41,000 --> 00:31:42,860
That was, um yeah, I think,

247
00:31:42,860 --> 00:31:51,170
a really nice introduction to some of the problems and really grounded in the kind of things you want to be speaking about.

248
00:31:51,170 --> 00:32:00,860
Yeah. So obviously we started off there talking a little bit about how essentialism has been utilised against against the continent.

249
00:32:00,860 --> 00:32:10,070
And a rather interesting parallel that I saw in NZ paper on the Lotus is the question of another question of kind of isolationism.

250
00:32:10,070 --> 00:32:17,060
So on the one hand, we have essentialism. We have this kind of tool saying Africans are all the same.

251
00:32:17,060 --> 00:32:20,090
And the other hand, you have this seemingly contradictory at all,

252
00:32:20,090 --> 00:32:25,010
saying African nations are all very different and all have a distinctive national culture.

253
00:32:25,010 --> 00:32:37,070
And so therefore can't meaningfully support each other. And this has been another tool kind of supported by by the West against Africa and NZ paper.

254
00:32:37,070 --> 00:32:42,200
See you talk about this understanding of nationalism as internationalism,

255
00:32:42,200 --> 00:32:49,340
so to be to belong to a particular African nation is to stand is to stand in solidarity with the oppressed peoples.

256
00:32:49,340 --> 00:32:57,650
And I was wondering if you could speak a little bit more about this and maybe speculate on how it is that the the West is so well managed

257
00:32:57,650 --> 00:33:12,430
to use these two very contradictory perspectives so well to kind of fight down the political insurgence and stuff in African states.

258
00:33:12,430 --> 00:33:21,610
Yes. Very briefly, I actually think that the question of difference is related to the question of othering of the African continent,

259
00:33:21,610 --> 00:33:28,120
because think of the way, for example, the discourse of tribalism was used.

260
00:33:28,120 --> 00:33:38,320
So the discourse of tribalism was used precisely to to sort of posit these divisions make it seem as if, you know,

261
00:33:38,320 --> 00:33:44,290
creating a sort of independent state would be difficult, would lead to a civil war and so on,

262
00:33:44,290 --> 00:33:48,250
but also that the different states would not support each other.

263
00:33:48,250 --> 00:33:57,480
But I mean, really, if this is sort of a critique that was developed by a lot of people, but specifically by asking the Fiji.

264
00:33:57,480 --> 00:34:06,690
Who, who who wrote about the ideology of tribalism in a critical week critiquing Western anthropological thinking along these lines.

265
00:34:06,690 --> 00:34:15,540
Because many of many of the traits that Western anthropologists have been using to refer to specific tribes,

266
00:34:15,540 --> 00:34:19,740
for instance, could also, you know, we could describe them in terms of the nation, right?

267
00:34:19,740 --> 00:34:23,700
So nobody talks about Belgium, for example, having different tribes, they talk,

268
00:34:23,700 --> 00:34:27,900
you know, I kind of that is a kind of French speaking national population.

269
00:34:27,900 --> 00:34:34,350
If we're thinking of language as a sort of the designated and then there is the Flemish or the Dutch speaking element,

270
00:34:34,350 --> 00:34:38,010
but nobody will talk about sort of, you know, tribalism in Belgium.

271
00:34:38,010 --> 00:34:44,220
So there is a sense in which this othering of the African continent has led to the utilisation of this discourse,

272
00:34:44,220 --> 00:34:49,530
where instead of talking about nations, people talk about tribes.

273
00:34:49,530 --> 00:34:53,340
And if you talk about nations, then a lot of these problems,

274
00:34:53,340 --> 00:34:58,200
they don't seem so intractable because almost every state in the world is a multinational state.

275
00:34:58,200 --> 00:35:04,890
I mean, that's just what it is to build a modern state. This is to build a multinational state.

276
00:35:04,890 --> 00:35:11,490
Yes. So with respect to notice, very, very briefly, I mean, what I found, and obviously I have to see that, you know,

277
00:35:11,490 --> 00:35:17,280
I'm only speaking about very specific intellectuals who contributed to Lotus who were contributing in

278
00:35:17,280 --> 00:35:24,430
this moment of the development of Afro-Asian ism in the aftermath of the Bandung Conference in 1955.

279
00:35:24,430 --> 00:35:33,880
So I don't want to, you know, generalise it. But you are people African intellectuals like Joseph Kaiser, Alex Oligomer.

280
00:35:33,880 --> 00:35:39,190
People who are really interested in thinking, OK, this is all nationalism, a form of chauvinism,

281
00:35:39,190 --> 00:35:46,450
because that's the question I was interested in and I found in the thought of those people that they were thinking of nationalism,

282
00:35:46,450 --> 00:35:56,230
not in terms of, you know, a kind of chauvinist blood and soil discourse, but really as to be a kind of nationalist in this context.

283
00:35:56,230 --> 00:36:01,310
And this particular historical moment is to participate in a kind of progressive political project.

284
00:36:01,310 --> 00:36:06,370
That's that's the that's really the kind of necessary condition on some of them thought it was sufficient,

285
00:36:06,370 --> 00:36:10,960
even if it didn't really matter if you were born somewhere else and move to that state.

286
00:36:10,960 --> 00:36:15,490
So, so I'll stop there because I don't want to speak for too long. But that's an excellent question.

287
00:36:15,490 --> 00:36:20,180
Thank you. Thank you, thank you very much.

288
00:36:20,180 --> 00:36:26,690
Yes, so I think we're going to move on a little bit now to another kind of matter philosophical question,

289
00:36:26,690 --> 00:36:32,330
which got touched on a little bit earlier by by professor.

290
00:36:32,330 --> 00:36:37,910
Kind of. So a common kind of layman criticism of much Western philosophy is that it's

291
00:36:37,910 --> 00:36:42,260
very divorced from reality and not very applicable at the practical level.

292
00:36:42,260 --> 00:36:46,940
And obviously, as Professor Jiang said earlier, it's often been African.

293
00:36:46,940 --> 00:36:54,230
African philosophy has often been conceived of something which is much more interested in practise kind of embedded in practise.

294
00:36:54,230 --> 00:36:59,810
And this criticism, I was reading broadly across some of professor publications,

295
00:36:59,810 --> 00:37:06,800
and it reminds me of some discussions about different conceptions of reason and in Singapore.

296
00:37:06,800 --> 00:37:10,230
And so the claim is that in the pursuit of knowledge,

297
00:37:10,230 --> 00:37:17,240
the European tradition kind of alienates itself from the object of knowledge and treats it as another.

298
00:37:17,240 --> 00:37:25,950
And so the subject theory, the European is then free to kind of conquer the object and use the object of knowledge to its own interests.

299
00:37:25,950 --> 00:37:32,030
And conversely, says single, in the African tradition, reason is most emphatic.

300
00:37:32,030 --> 00:37:39,680
It's not antagonistic. The goal is to, he says, to intermingle with the object, with the hope that it kind of discloses its being.

301
00:37:39,680 --> 00:37:44,480
And I was just wondering if you think this is a useful way of conceptualising some of the problems with

302
00:37:44,480 --> 00:37:50,090
Western philosophical methodology and highlighting the benefits of a more practical approach to philosophy?

303
00:37:50,090 --> 00:37:56,000
And you know, whether you think that we should be speaking about African philosophy as this more practical approach?

304
00:37:56,000 --> 00:38:02,040
Yes. So that brings us to the question of the nature or philosophy.

305
00:38:02,040 --> 00:38:11,630
What philosophy is? Well, of course you see, we are often told and I am also guilty of that.

306
00:38:11,630 --> 00:38:22,490
I used to tell my first year students, you know, that philosophy is a discipline where human reason is at its highest RFI.

307
00:38:22,490 --> 00:38:26,450
You know where you you are critical of everything.

308
00:38:26,450 --> 00:38:31,550
You don't take anything for granted. You don't assume you ask questions, right?

309
00:38:31,550 --> 00:38:35,390
When you see something, you ask questions, keep asking questions.

310
00:38:35,390 --> 00:38:41,540
You're supposed to be critical. In other words, it's worth thinking of is at its highest.

311
00:38:41,540 --> 00:38:47,990
And perhaps that's why they call this highest degree a degree in philosophy,

312
00:38:47,990 --> 00:38:56,120
partly because they believe that you know you've identified a problem in whichever area it is,

313
00:38:56,120 --> 00:39:08,660
whether it's medicine, law, whatever you've identified, a problem you've undertaken research or throw it at and arrive at a conclusion at a thesis.

314
00:39:08,660 --> 00:39:12,760
So they give you a degree in philosophy. Ph.D.

315
00:39:12,760 --> 00:39:17,120
Right. So in other words, the emphasis is on thinking, you know.

316
00:39:17,120 --> 00:39:28,430
And I've often argued that because of that emphasis, you know, I think philosophers, at least some seem to have lost their way.

317
00:39:28,430 --> 00:39:32,540
They tend to think for the sake of thinking.

318
00:39:32,540 --> 00:39:40,670
So in other words, they are more focussed on this criticality, you know, thinking critically being logical, right?

319
00:39:40,670 --> 00:39:48,320
So that you see your conclusion should follow from the premises you give premises which lead to the conclusion.

320
00:39:48,320 --> 00:40:02,630
In other words, in philosophy, emphasis for some of us seem to be on the validity of your reasoning of your argument rather than the sound miss.

321
00:40:02,630 --> 00:40:10,040
Right? So in other words, the concern is not that whether the conclusion is actually true, all right,

322
00:40:10,040 --> 00:40:20,060
but that concerned with the hypothetical truth that if the premises are true, if not that they are true, if they are true, then they would lead.

323
00:40:20,060 --> 00:40:26,390
The conclusion would also be true. So the emphasis is on validity, rather on soundness.

324
00:40:26,390 --> 00:40:32,660
And you see, that's why I've often said, I don't know if any of you have encountered it.

325
00:40:32,660 --> 00:40:40,250
Usually at times when I introduce myself and say I teach philosophy, no look at me and say,

326
00:40:40,250 --> 00:40:47,000
Well, you are different, you don't because they see philosophers as troublemakers, right?

327
00:40:47,000 --> 00:40:54,200
You can't say anything. When you say anything, you start questioning, you start asking you and you see, that's how some of us operate.

328
00:40:54,200 --> 00:41:03,650
You know, whenever somebody says anything, you ask. So they see you as a troublemaker, you know, and people who live in an ivory tower,

329
00:41:03,650 --> 00:41:10,160
you know, people who are very theoretical, not concerned with the practical,

330
00:41:10,160 --> 00:41:16,280
pragmatic aspect of things, which is really unfortunate because in truth,

331
00:41:16,280 --> 00:41:23,030
as Odetta emphasises in this book, In truth, philosophy should be about life.

332
00:41:23,030 --> 00:41:29,210
Good living, not just you shouldn't just leave it up to a theoretical level.

333
00:41:29,210 --> 00:41:36,860
And you see, that's why in a sense, therefore, given his the notion of philosophic sagacity,

334
00:41:36,860 --> 00:41:46,310
you know, he's he's emphasising more on the practicality of reasoning, the wisdom part of it.

335
00:41:46,310 --> 00:41:56,210
You don't just a reason for the sake of reasoning, but it should be focussed towards some kind of utility.

336
00:41:56,210 --> 00:42:02,980
And you see, essentially that's what even single. Phase one is making that distinction.

337
00:42:02,980 --> 00:42:15,390
But you see. In Western philosophy, the thinking is, you know, you distinguish yourself, you separate yourself the subject from the object, right?

338
00:42:15,390 --> 00:42:23,160
And then you put it at a distance and dissect it, cutting it whatnot as a way of understanding it.

339
00:42:23,160 --> 00:42:29,490
All right. There's a distance as opposed to the African worldview.

340
00:42:29,490 --> 00:42:34,260
Well, the subject is part and parcel of the object.

341
00:42:34,260 --> 00:42:43,560
The subject does not tie himself away from the object. So the subject actually gets to understand the object, not by dissecting it,

342
00:42:43,560 --> 00:42:51,150
not by putting a distance between him or her and the object and dissecting it as a wolf, understanding it.

343
00:42:51,150 --> 00:42:59,310
But since you are part and parcel of everything, you get to know it through feeling it, through touching it.

344
00:42:59,310 --> 00:43:05,580
You know, that's how cognition takes place, because that distinction is not.

345
00:43:05,580 --> 00:43:13,380
So there's some element of practical utility to it, but as opposed to those of us who,

346
00:43:13,380 --> 00:43:22,800
you know, theorise too much and operate at a real fight level, which is very unfortunate.

347
00:43:22,800 --> 00:43:28,390
And you see, that's generally what the lay person thinks of a philosopher.

348
00:43:28,390 --> 00:43:32,220
That's when you stop any at all. That person is a philosopher.

349
00:43:32,220 --> 00:43:39,120
They see you as somebody different is the thinking is is a bit different from the way other people think.

350
00:43:39,120 --> 00:43:45,920
All right. I'll talk about that. Can add.

351
00:43:45,920 --> 00:43:55,820
Yes. Yeah. I mean, I, uh, in terms of this distinction of the practical and the theoretical.

352
00:43:55,820 --> 00:44:04,280
Yes, I mean, I think there is also the the specific historical context because if you look at,

353
00:44:04,280 --> 00:44:07,460
you know, and professor watching knows much more about this than I do,

354
00:44:07,460 --> 00:44:14,000
but I'll just mention if you look at sort of the historical context of the emergence of

355
00:44:14,000 --> 00:44:19,610
if you want to call it modern professional academic philosophy on the African continent,

356
00:44:19,610 --> 00:44:25,510
it's obviously taking place in the context of either the post-independence struggles, you know,

357
00:44:25,510 --> 00:44:31,880
a kind of development, development programmes and debates about the best path to development and all of that.

358
00:44:31,880 --> 00:44:38,510
So there was also a demand on not just philosophers, but on intellectuals in general to show to people,

359
00:44:38,510 --> 00:44:46,550
OK, this is why this is relevant, which which which isn't, which isn't something that we can describe.

360
00:44:46,550 --> 00:44:49,160
But I think there's good and bad independent of context,

361
00:44:49,160 --> 00:44:57,260
because obviously under some circumstances it could be used to to to stifle certain lines of thinking.

362
00:44:57,260 --> 00:45:06,590
The other thing is, I mean, I think it's interesting that when we do this comparative analysis of Western and African philosophy,

363
00:45:06,590 --> 00:45:13,430
I think it's important that we don't also um, that we also question the self-image of Western philosophy as well, right?

364
00:45:13,430 --> 00:45:17,360
We don't take it as something free given that's already there because obviously you had this,

365
00:45:17,360 --> 00:45:21,530
you have historical processes that explain canon formation.

366
00:45:21,530 --> 00:45:29,520
So you also have, you know, tremendous diversity right in Western philosophy.

367
00:45:29,520 --> 00:45:32,930
So think of like and I'm going to do very crude things,

368
00:45:32,930 --> 00:45:40,160
but but just to to to illustrate the point or think of historical versus historical philosophers or like Cargill versus Spinoza,

369
00:45:40,160 --> 00:45:44,810
for example, struggles over what counts as knowledge and early modern England.

370
00:45:44,810 --> 00:45:50,900
So I had like the experimental philosopher to sort of boil an opposition to Hobbes,

371
00:45:50,900 --> 00:45:57,520
who who sort of demonstrative knowledge as sort of the paradigmatic knowledge geometry was his model.

372
00:45:57,520 --> 00:46:01,880
And then you also have like, you know, enlightenment philosophers and then counter enlightenment philosophers.

373
00:46:01,880 --> 00:46:04,600
You have you have also like philosophical romantics, right,

374
00:46:04,600 --> 00:46:13,550
who who also took issue with this idea that we should sort of dissect the world and assume that there is this sort

375
00:46:13,550 --> 00:46:20,480
of schism between subject and object and that we have to manipulate nature in a certain way to understand it.

376
00:46:20,480 --> 00:46:22,790
Mm hmm. So there is this tremendous diversity,

377
00:46:22,790 --> 00:46:31,870
and I think this is why it's also important to to give room to diversity in African philosophy because, you know, maybe.

378
00:46:31,870 --> 00:46:36,190
Some, some some some African philosophers only want to do philosophy of logic,

379
00:46:36,190 --> 00:46:41,350
and already Professor Jiang mentioned that he works on philosophy of logic as well.

380
00:46:41,350 --> 00:46:47,110
So I think we should definitely, you know, allow room for people with different interests,

381
00:46:47,110 --> 00:46:52,540
people who don't necessarily want to or to think that they don't have anything to contribute to ethical discourse.

382
00:46:52,540 --> 00:47:02,670
For example, I think that's fine. You know, not everybody has this proclivity or or the ability to to intervene in practical debates.

383
00:47:02,670 --> 00:47:09,460
And I'll stop there. Thank you. I want to add something to that, right?

384
00:47:09,460 --> 00:47:16,180
OK. We just want to throw some caution right in that.

385
00:47:16,180 --> 00:47:17,160
From what I said,

386
00:47:17,160 --> 00:47:30,730
it should not be interpreted to mean that I'm saying that Western philosophy is all critical and does not concern itself with the practical,

387
00:47:30,730 --> 00:47:36,610
whereas African philosophy is concerned with the practical. No, not as subtle.

388
00:47:36,610 --> 00:47:42,460
Well, even in the west, in western philosophy, there are various theories of knowledge, right?

389
00:47:42,460 --> 00:47:50,350
So for instance, there's a broad category between analytics called analytics call of Philosophy.

390
00:47:50,350 --> 00:48:03,850
Well, to emphasise a lot on this thinking, but also within still western philosophy, you have those who fall in love with hermeneutics existentialism.

391
00:48:03,850 --> 00:48:07,600
Those are very pragmatic and practical, so to speak.

392
00:48:07,600 --> 00:48:17,590
Just as much as also, I think in Africa, you'll find some persons who are very theoretical and verified in their thinking.

393
00:48:17,590 --> 00:48:21,400
So it's not a question of one. Is this one?

394
00:48:21,400 --> 00:48:28,150
Is that not simply a question of emphasis? I just wanted to question that.

395
00:48:28,150 --> 00:48:38,500
Yeah, absolutely. Thank you so much, both of you. It's a really brilliant and pretty in-depth introduction to some of the ideas.

396
00:48:38,500 --> 00:48:42,490
So I think we're going to move over to case first section sectional,

397
00:48:42,490 --> 00:48:52,000
which is going a little bit more in-depth into some of the ideas which you guys have brought up over.

398
00:48:52,000 --> 00:48:59,280
Thank you, Scarlett. Now we're going to take a closer look at each of your scholarly work, beginning with Henry Odoro,

399
00:48:59,280 --> 00:49:05,260
a ruckus idea of philosophical sagacity which watching you mentioned earlier.

400
00:49:05,260 --> 00:49:10,540
So please, could you start us off by outlining a Rukus concept of sagacity?

401
00:49:10,540 --> 00:49:15,020
And what does it mean to be a philosophical sage? Right?

402
00:49:15,020 --> 00:49:25,430
Thank you. Thank you, dear. Oh no. You see, odorous concern was that some philosophers, right?

403
00:49:25,430 --> 00:49:33,520
Seem to be very theoretical in their thinking, and that's why he came up with this concept of.

404
00:49:33,520 --> 00:49:45,910
Philosophic sagacity or sage philosophy, as some people would put it, right, because within that trend of philosophic sagacity,

405
00:49:45,910 --> 00:49:57,070
the position is that philosophy does not start and end in modern Africa, traditional Africa.

406
00:49:57,070 --> 00:50:06,970
Also, there are thinkers in traditional Africa, but those thinkers are not professionally trained philosophers.

407
00:50:06,970 --> 00:50:14,950
They are not like their oracle. They're not like quasi they. They're a lot like Colin Ontology.

408
00:50:14,950 --> 00:50:28,420
They're not like, you know, the trained philosophers. No, but they are nevertheless critical independent thinkers or most precisely, the sages.

409
00:50:28,420 --> 00:50:37,590
And of course, initially, or Deira or Ruka defined sage as a person.

410
00:50:37,590 --> 00:50:41,370
Could be man or woman. Not limited to one.

411
00:50:41,370 --> 00:50:44,370
The way some people think.

412
00:50:44,370 --> 00:51:05,130
It's either man or woman who is grounded in the wisdoms and customs of his or her people, and therefore he or she acts as a mirror of first society.

413
00:51:05,130 --> 00:51:18,570
That if you want to know any aspect of the customs or cultures of the people, then this age would be able to tell you that this is how it is.

414
00:51:18,570 --> 00:51:24,930
All right. OK, so that's the sage or more accurately, a fork sage sage.

415
00:51:24,930 --> 00:51:34,530
That's the fork sage. All right. But there are other sages who besides being grounded in the wisdom.

416
00:51:34,530 --> 00:51:42,300
Of the community, they are nevertheless critical independent thinkers.

417
00:51:42,300 --> 00:51:54,930
They go beyond sagacity, in other words, they have this capability of interrogating and discussing issues pertaining to their customers.

418
00:51:54,930 --> 00:52:09,120
And in some cases, the philosophic sages actually reject some aspects of their customers, especially those which do not satisfy the rational scrutiny.

419
00:52:09,120 --> 00:52:17,810
So, in other words, being a sage? Does not make you philosophical and being philosophical does not make your seat.

420
00:52:17,810 --> 00:52:22,190
But the ideal is to combine the two.

421
00:52:22,190 --> 00:52:27,440
Now his concern as well was that you see, Oh, of course,

422
00:52:27,440 --> 00:52:40,760
I have written a paper several papers trying to explain the rationale or the aims of sagacity, and I've often categorised them as three.

423
00:52:40,760 --> 00:52:52,250
Right? I usually call it the epistemic. There's the epistemic aim, the academic aid and the cultural literalist.

424
00:52:52,250 --> 00:52:56,960
But I'm more interested now in the epistemic aim.

425
00:52:56,960 --> 00:53:08,510
You see, the problem is that in Africa now, though, I think I'll have an opportunity to say a lot more in some minutes to come later on.

426
00:53:08,510 --> 00:53:19,160
You know, most persons in Africa today do not know much about their customs and cultures because they've actually adopted the foreign cultures,

427
00:53:19,160 --> 00:53:24,590
so they are more grounded in foreign cultures rather than their own culture.

428
00:53:24,590 --> 00:53:29,000
And you see, there is worry in a way was that no,

429
00:53:29,000 --> 00:53:40,370
these aspects need to be documented and put down on paper so that they could be discussed even at the academic level.

430
00:53:40,370 --> 00:53:45,680
All right. So that was one of the aims or data Oracle had in mind.

431
00:53:45,680 --> 00:53:53,060
Besides, the culture is one which was supposed to bring this national culture so.

432
00:53:53,060 --> 00:54:03,160
So that in a nutshell, was auditors concerned with sage philosophy.

433
00:54:03,160 --> 00:54:07,060
OK. Thank you for that. A summary of what it is to be a sage,

434
00:54:07,060 --> 00:54:12,730
and I think we should zoom in on what we say you're most interested in at the moment, which is that epistemic aim.

435
00:54:12,730 --> 00:54:23,800
So it sounds as though a took in this case, various Kenyan beliefs and practises to be a world view or to have a worldview underpinning them.

436
00:54:23,800 --> 00:54:32,230
And he saw sages almost as taps as individuals who could give him access to this worldview through dialogue.

437
00:54:32,230 --> 00:54:43,000
So firstly, is that right? And secondly, what is it for a philosophy to underpin a worldview or a set of practises?

438
00:54:43,000 --> 00:54:48,010
OK, all right, thank you, thank you for that. OK, you see.

439
00:54:48,010 --> 00:54:55,810
So for instance, Kenya. Kenya is, as I said, actually earlier, you know, Africa is a land of diversity.

440
00:54:55,810 --> 00:55:08,140
So for instance, in Kenya, there are 44 plus ethnic groups and different ethnic groups, or some would call them tribes.

441
00:55:08,140 --> 00:55:13,180
But I never like using the word tribes and surprising ethnic groups.

442
00:55:13,180 --> 00:55:24,460
So they are about 44 plus ethnic groups. Some books have put it on 40, some 42, some 44, some 45 or to six bodies over 40.

443
00:55:24,460 --> 00:55:29,320
And their customs and cultures are in no way quite distinct in a way.

444
00:55:29,320 --> 00:55:33,460
There are some distinctions here and there that you see, for instance,

445
00:55:33,460 --> 00:55:41,650
or there belong to the ethnic group, just the same ethnic group that I come from.

446
00:55:41,650 --> 00:55:50,080
Right? So you find that if I want to know something about another ethnic group, for instance, the Kikuyu, for instance,

447
00:55:50,080 --> 00:56:03,640
or the Kalimah or even the Maasai, you see, I would have to go to someone who knows it and this someone would be the sage in that community.

448
00:56:03,640 --> 00:56:10,870
He's the one who would be able to explain to me what their customs, their culture is.

449
00:56:10,870 --> 00:56:22,750
But if the sage is philosophical as well, right, he would be able not just to tell me what the customs are, but the reasons underlying the customs.

450
00:56:22,750 --> 00:56:29,020
That is why the customs are the way they are and not otherwise.

451
00:56:29,020 --> 00:56:38,020
I philosophic sage would be able to rationalise over that give you the reason why it is that right?

452
00:56:38,020 --> 00:56:46,780
So for instance, you see amongst, for instance, the ethnic community, which I come from, right?

453
00:56:46,780 --> 00:56:56,290
You'll find that we usually remove the six lower teeth, the six lower teeth, the cut,

454
00:56:56,290 --> 00:57:05,050
the call, the incisors, six of them as a rite of passage from initiation into adulthood.

455
00:57:05,050 --> 00:57:09,550
All right. OK. It's more or less like circumcision us.

456
00:57:09,550 --> 00:57:14,380
Right? You get the last six teeth removed.

457
00:57:14,380 --> 00:57:22,780
Of course, the custom is dying. No. Right? But 50, 100 years back, it was in pain.

458
00:57:22,780 --> 00:57:34,560
OK, so that's the custom. But you see, a sage will tell you all that, but a philosophic sage will give you the reason why.

459
00:57:34,560 --> 00:57:43,200
The laws do that right. Most people don't know because, no, you know, interestingly, with customs, when something becomes customary,

460
00:57:43,200 --> 00:57:49,920
so to speak, people just do it, do it, but they forget the reason behind it.

461
00:57:49,920 --> 00:57:52,710
But the sages, the philosophic sages, would know.

462
00:57:52,710 --> 00:58:00,450
So for instance, the reason why laws did that was that I think about one hundred and fifty years ago,

463
00:58:00,450 --> 00:58:12,360
about a century and a half ago amongst the law there was this disease, lockjaw disease, Lockjaw, where you just look cannot open.

464
00:58:12,360 --> 00:58:16,920
And of course, so many people were dying because of that cause.

465
00:58:16,920 --> 00:58:28,710
You can't be fed. Not is when they say that, oh, what we can do is remove this exploitive and then serve the person porridge.

466
00:58:28,710 --> 00:58:32,820
And they survived. And with time, they said, All right, no.

467
00:58:32,820 --> 00:58:36,780
It became a custom that, OK, there's initiation into adulthood.

468
00:58:36,780 --> 00:58:44,370
You remove the 16th so that in case this disease comes again, then we are safe.

469
00:58:44,370 --> 00:58:51,300
So you see said you'd tell you all that philosophically, but you see the ordinary loser would not know that.

470
00:58:51,300 --> 00:58:59,280
So the sages would actually go beyond the practise and try to give you the reason

471
00:58:59,280 --> 00:59:09,360
why it is the way it is and hence the need and importance of philosophic sages,

472
00:59:09,360 --> 00:59:22,670
so to speak. And of course, as also the other aim of philosophic sagacity, especially, well, there was 1976 project, right?

473
00:59:22,670 --> 00:59:30,540
The aim was to come up with a national culture, Kenyan national culture to unify the Kenyans.

474
00:59:30,540 --> 00:59:38,430
So the idea was that we would undertake researchers in all the communities and then get

475
00:59:38,430 --> 00:59:47,220
the philosophic sages sit down and try to harmonise those aspects which are in conflict.

476
00:59:47,220 --> 00:59:54,150
And based on that, harmonisation and national culture would be constructed.

477
00:59:54,150 --> 00:59:58,740
Of course, we are still very far away from that.

478
00:59:58,740 --> 01:00:03,660
All right. I'll talk there. Maybe there are questions. I have an interesting question.

479
01:00:03,660 --> 01:00:14,820
If? So to sort of reflect back, you've given us this example of the practise of removing the insides of the lower incisors.

480
01:00:14,820 --> 01:00:23,190
And I think you mentioned a Ruka in the first project and the second project, he he interviewed sages and philosophical sages.

481
01:00:23,190 --> 01:00:33,600
And so you've given us a definition of what it is for a philosophy to underlie a practise, which is to contain the reasons for that practise.

482
01:00:33,600 --> 01:00:38,220
So. The interviews he conducted were.

483
01:00:38,220 --> 01:00:44,220
A way of accessing the reasons for a particular practise.

484
01:00:44,220 --> 01:00:51,310
One thing I think is interesting about this also in relation to sort of modernity.

485
01:00:51,310 --> 01:00:57,460
Is is the emphasis that it places on critical thought and critical thought as

486
01:00:57,460 --> 01:01:06,860
a as a practise of evaluating and keeping alive the reasons for traditions.

487
01:01:06,860 --> 01:01:12,990
You mentioned the 1976 project. So I think we'll move on to another question about that.

488
01:01:12,990 --> 01:01:18,800
And so I have a quotation here from one of your papers,

489
01:01:18,800 --> 01:01:27,290
but you say a Ruka intended his project of interviewing philosophical sages to remedy philosophical naivete,

490
01:01:27,290 --> 01:01:36,130
which he saw as a major threat and danger to the development of authentic national culture in modern Kenya.

491
01:01:36,130 --> 01:01:42,550
So could we please unpack together this quotation?

492
01:01:42,550 --> 01:01:48,510
And I think a starting point would be. What does he mean by philosophical naivete?

493
01:01:48,510 --> 01:01:56,200
Because superficially, it could refer to a sort of a state of Africa or a belief about African philosophy.

494
01:01:56,200 --> 01:02:01,590
All right, thank you. Thank you for that. No philosophical naivete.

495
01:02:01,590 --> 01:02:13,800
Yes. Right now, you see philosophy is sometimes taken as the heritage of Greeks, right?

496
01:02:13,800 --> 01:02:20,640
And thus, some of us treat it as a typical European activity.

497
01:02:20,640 --> 01:02:32,610
All right. So the so-called what I refer to as the Western discourse on Africa not only give birth to that attitude.

498
01:02:32,610 --> 01:02:42,920
But it has continued to perpetuate that belief, despite African responses.

499
01:02:42,920 --> 01:02:44,810
To the contrary,

500
01:02:44,810 --> 01:02:56,390
the Western discourse on Africa has outlined it in my text trends and issues in Africa and Philosophy and Masondo also it is, I think,

501
01:02:56,390 --> 01:03:01,370
African philosophy in search of identity, you know, portrays, you know,

502
01:03:01,370 --> 01:03:09,140
that Western discourse in Africa portrays Africa as a continent innocent of philosophical thought.

503
01:03:09,140 --> 01:03:22,070
And because of that attitude, that philosophy in the proper sense is European that is autochthonous to Europe and alien to Africa.

504
01:03:22,070 --> 01:03:36,710
A good number of people who have hard to say or write anything about or own African philosophy have done so with remarkable naivete,

505
01:03:36,710 --> 01:03:40,880
but with a lot of innocence and ignorance.

506
01:03:40,880 --> 01:03:53,270
Salt within philosophical circles, those who embraced the western discourse of Africa were, according to their Aurukun, misguided.

507
01:03:53,270 --> 01:04:04,370
They were misguided. They exhibited naivety by denying philosophical mode of thought to Africans.

508
01:04:04,370 --> 01:04:14,730
That is what he refers to as philosophical naivety that is thinking about philosophy.

509
01:04:14,730 --> 01:04:24,110
The philosophical world of thought is a reserve of Europe not to be found in Africa.

510
01:04:24,110 --> 01:04:34,060
So the question then becomes how is it a threat to the development of national culture?

511
01:04:34,060 --> 01:04:43,970
In Kenya, that would be question or other nation states in Africa right now.

512
01:04:43,970 --> 01:04:49,130
Culture Otero Ruka argued culture has two sides to it.

513
01:04:49,130 --> 01:04:54,740
Two facets a theoretical and practical right.

514
01:04:54,740 --> 01:05:00,950
The practical. Is the visible aspect of culture.

515
01:05:00,950 --> 01:05:10,490
It includes music, things like music, dance, fashion, you know, and various other visible aspects of culture.

516
01:05:10,490 --> 01:05:20,540
The theoretical the theoretical consists of the reasons that justify the various practical aspects of culture,

517
01:05:20,540 --> 01:05:25,650
and the two theoretical and practical are inseparable.

518
01:05:25,650 --> 01:05:37,640
Well, data and rightfully argue in some sense, one can say that the theoretical is the pedestal upon which the practical is conquered.

519
01:05:37,640 --> 01:05:48,290
Or stated slightly differently. The theoretical is the metaphysical anchor of the practical,

520
01:05:48,290 --> 01:06:04,660
philosophical naivete separates the theoretical and practical aspects of culture with respect to Africa in that it denies Africa the theoretical.

521
01:06:04,660 --> 01:06:07,660
One could say, oh, say, therefore,

522
01:06:07,660 --> 01:06:21,580
that the persons who operate within the confines of philosophical naivete sees African culture and its philosophy as a lived experience,

523
01:06:21,580 --> 01:06:30,700
not a myriad of concepts to be pictured and rationalised by the mind.

524
01:06:30,700 --> 01:06:39,490
Such a person sees the loss of in Africa as an inseparable part of the concrete of

525
01:06:39,490 --> 01:06:49,300
culture of Africans feel and leave it and not an entity to be isolated and discussed.

526
01:06:49,300 --> 01:07:01,930
So as a detailed mental activity and exercise philosophy has, according to this position, no place in African culture.

527
01:07:01,930 --> 01:07:05,190
And therein lies the danger. Right?

528
01:07:05,190 --> 01:07:20,500
A culture without a clear philosophy is actually incomplete and vulnerable to every foreign Islam or value, no matter how disgusting they may be.

529
01:07:20,500 --> 01:07:29,140
All right. And according to Ruka, that was one of the biggest threat to the various African cultures.

530
01:07:29,140 --> 01:07:41,860
And he believed that one sure way to avoid the invasion of foreign invasion by foreign ideas is for a

531
01:07:41,860 --> 01:07:51,670
nation to develop and articulate the philosophy of its culture so that when these foreign isms come in,

532
01:07:51,670 --> 01:07:57,000
they have to contend with a theoretical aspect of.

533
01:07:57,000 --> 01:08:07,560
The culture, but in the absence of that theoretical, when these things come, they find a vacuum and they just fit in very easily.

534
01:08:07,560 --> 01:08:18,640
So philosophical naivete, you know, their view was dangerous to African cultures in that sense.

535
01:08:18,640 --> 01:08:21,010
Thank you. So to reiterate then,

536
01:08:21,010 --> 01:08:28,990
philosophical naivete is a mistaken belief that African philosophy does not exist or that traditional cultures do not have a philosophy,

537
01:08:28,990 --> 01:08:39,220
and Erika wants to defend against people believing that. So is it fair to say that he's is he perhaps most concerned with philosophical naivete as a

538
01:08:39,220 --> 01:08:47,310
reflexive belief that Africans would have about their own supposed lack of a theoretical basis?

539
01:08:47,310 --> 01:08:56,590
Yeah, there's there's that, too. There's that too, because you see this Western discourse on Africa was what it was and still is quite

540
01:08:56,590 --> 01:09:02,890
true to an extent that even Africans from Africans have actually assimilated it.

541
01:09:02,890 --> 01:09:13,860
Believe in it. So. And that even is now doubly dangerous to African customs and cultures.

542
01:09:13,860 --> 01:09:18,480
So to finish unpacking this quotation, now that we know what philosophical naivete is,

543
01:09:18,480 --> 01:09:22,740
I'd like to turn to how he saw it as a threat and how he hoped to combat it.

544
01:09:22,740 --> 01:09:30,510
So there's this phrase. What he thinks is threatened is the development of authentic national culture in modern Kenya.

545
01:09:30,510 --> 01:09:34,920
It seems clear to me why America thought he had and left and authentically Kenyan

546
01:09:34,920 --> 01:09:38,930
philosophy because he had been interviewing Kenyan sages about their own practises.

547
01:09:38,930 --> 01:09:47,230
So there's the authenticity is clear. But the word authentic sort of might suggest essentialism and to return to a

548
01:09:47,230 --> 01:09:52,210
theme we flagged up earlier as the occupation with the danger of essentialism.

549
01:09:52,210 --> 01:09:55,980
So I'd like to sort of dispel that here.

550
01:09:55,980 --> 01:10:04,910
So how would you respond to someone who reads this and dismisses it or leave as an essentialist this let me come in first before the articles.

551
01:10:04,910 --> 01:10:21,420
Yeah, oh well, it is when you read or closely that the idea of this concept being essentialist, you know,

552
01:10:21,420 --> 01:10:35,040
is relegated me to backstage because really, all that he's saying is that you see these customs, these practises have a philosophical basis.

553
01:10:35,040 --> 01:10:46,860
So what he wants to do is have these on Earth, you know, brought out in the fall because a good number of them are just implicit or underground.

554
01:10:46,860 --> 01:10:51,630
So the idea is to ask them have been explicated.

555
01:10:51,630 --> 01:10:58,050
What have the sages? Of course, some of them would be in conflict.

556
01:10:58,050 --> 01:11:02,610
Right? Of course, there are 44 ethnic groups. Some of them would be in conflict.

557
01:11:02,610 --> 01:11:06,090
But after they've been on Earth, the sages,

558
01:11:06,090 --> 01:11:16,740
the sages from the various communities would sit down to harmonise those aspects, which are in conflict, right?

559
01:11:16,740 --> 01:11:21,900
But then, even as they do that, the idea is not.

560
01:11:21,900 --> 01:11:23,700
And this is very important.

561
01:11:23,700 --> 01:11:36,150
Well, there is no saying that there is no space for foreign values or foreign customs is not saying that is simply saying that, OK,

562
01:11:36,150 --> 01:11:49,530
let's have the Africans, these Africa aspects of it and anything we've come from outside, we add to it or is consistent with, then that's fine.

563
01:11:49,530 --> 01:11:59,670
His concern was that you see, there are some aspects with foreign aspects we just come in which are distasteful,

564
01:11:59,670 --> 01:12:05,460
but we find space because the theoretical aspect is missing.

565
01:12:05,460 --> 01:12:15,870
So I think he gave examples such as basically within medicine, for instance, he says, you know, there are so many things like,

566
01:12:15,870 --> 01:12:26,310
well, OK, but technological morality that he gives you see this idea of sagging pants, you know, the pants sagging.

567
01:12:26,310 --> 01:12:33,030
You see that the young ones, you know, like, especially the men, young teenagers,

568
01:12:33,030 --> 01:12:41,280
they walk around with their pants sagging very low with, you know, you can see their underwear as you know, wearers and whatnot.

569
01:12:41,280 --> 01:12:47,010
And you see it's no very fashionable even in Africa, amongst the other ones.

570
01:12:47,010 --> 01:12:53,610
But you see well, there, I see what's the benefit of something like this, you see?

571
01:12:53,610 --> 01:13:01,230
But you see it is finding space and very popular because there's the theoretical

572
01:13:01,230 --> 01:13:06,510
aspect is not well established because if the theoretical are well established,

573
01:13:06,510 --> 01:13:13,980
then it would check such undesirable elements, but desirable ones, which would add would come in.

574
01:13:13,980 --> 01:13:18,600
So in other words, he's not socialising, so to speak.

575
01:13:18,600 --> 01:13:24,240
It's only that. And he again, maybe I'll go back to Nkrumah.

576
01:13:24,240 --> 01:13:28,020
You see, when you read Nkrumah in his conscience ism,

577
01:13:28,020 --> 01:13:38,580
I think one of the chapters he says that you see Africa Modern Africa has three segments Europe, Christian, Traditional Africa and Islamic.

578
01:13:38,580 --> 01:13:45,450
All right. And those three are competing. I call them competing ideologies in modern Africa,

579
01:13:45,450 --> 01:13:52,800
and it's making life very difficult in Africa because those three ideologies are complete competing.

580
01:13:52,800 --> 01:13:58,700
Each wants to be the dominant one right is Islamic, one which wants to dominate.

581
01:13:58,700 --> 01:14:03,270
But then there's the Europe Christian, one also, which wants to be the dominant one.

582
01:14:03,270 --> 01:14:07,500
Then there's the traditional African one, which is also wants to be dominant.

583
01:14:07,500 --> 01:14:16,920
So Nkrumah argued that no, the ideal is to get the best or the good from all these three.

584
01:14:16,920 --> 01:14:20,820
It doesn't matter. All right. Get the good from all the three.

585
01:14:20,820 --> 01:14:29,880
Harmonise them. But of course, he also emphasised that the pedestal should be African traditions.

586
01:14:29,880 --> 01:14:38,970
In other words, the African personality. So as he puts it, but he does not say that you discard everything.

587
01:14:38,970 --> 01:14:53,970
You grow Christian. So this is that's the way in which order is seeing sage philosophy as a vehicle to national deconstructing national culture.

588
01:14:53,970 --> 01:14:59,930
If that makes sense. It certainly does.

589
01:14:59,930 --> 01:15:05,120
I think you're right about this at the end of your article that we're in the notes that he envisage this discursive

590
01:15:05,120 --> 01:15:13,590
process would suggest from different ethnic groups would rationally discuss their philosophies and try to harmonise them.

591
01:15:13,590 --> 01:15:20,960
And I suppose you could extrapolate from that and say that in this fear of politics or education,

592
01:15:20,960 --> 01:15:27,290
having an articulated philosophy and knowing the reasons for that traditional practises would make it possible

593
01:15:27,290 --> 01:15:34,910
to have debates and to evaluate them and cultivate a society that meets the needs of the people living in it.

594
01:15:34,910 --> 01:15:43,070
Whereas if you don't have that, you don't have the words to to discuss. Dad, did you have something to add?

595
01:15:43,070 --> 01:15:53,000
Yeah, yeah, it's so, so so yeah, I think there is an overlap again with too connected to sort of the the overlaps between,

596
01:15:53,000 --> 01:15:58,970
for example, Luca's understanding of culture that become adults understanding of culture.

597
01:15:58,970 --> 01:16:09,020
Again, I mean, so so the thing that Gabriel is concerned with is being able to assess the relative utility or this utility of foreign foreign ideas,

598
01:16:09,020 --> 01:16:17,180
foreign institutions and so on. So. So again, it's not really a question of rejecting something that's foreign, but understanding that,

599
01:16:17,180 --> 01:16:23,810
you know, the mere fact that it's associated with, you know, a kind of prestigious power centre.

600
01:16:23,810 --> 01:16:31,460
So if it comes from like the former metropolis or you're like an informal French colonised from Paris or something or,

601
01:16:31,460 --> 01:16:36,110
you know, you're in greater Nairobi than it's London or something,

602
01:16:36,110 --> 01:16:42,230
that this idea that just because it comes from a certain place that's associated with prestige because

603
01:16:42,230 --> 01:16:49,790
of of these historical relations of colonialism that we have to be able to sort of discriminate.

604
01:16:49,790 --> 01:16:54,080
And so to that extent, I think the two approaches are not essential.

605
01:16:54,080 --> 01:17:05,090
It's also a reaction, I think, to the manner in which, especially after independence of some of the elite ruling groups took on this foreign.

606
01:17:05,090 --> 01:17:10,190
So almost all these foreign elements without critical assessment and sort of

607
01:17:10,190 --> 01:17:16,150
propagated them as cultural elements that should be just assimilated by by everybody.

608
01:17:16,150 --> 01:17:23,420
And so in a sense, it's really a kind of the basic demand of philosophy, right, articulated in a specific historical context,

609
01:17:23,420 --> 01:17:29,780
which is OK, we have to be able to give justifications for our acceptance or rejection of some elements.

610
01:17:29,780 --> 01:17:36,410
We cannot simply accept it or reject it, you know, just because everybody is doing it or something like that.

611
01:17:36,410 --> 01:17:38,690
So to that extent, it's really, you know,

612
01:17:38,690 --> 01:17:47,830
the expression of what people would think of as just like the regular classical philosophic spirit in a specific historical context.

613
01:17:47,830 --> 01:17:57,040
Yes, if I may add something right to what they are said, I agree with what the others say 100 percent, that's true.

614
01:17:57,040 --> 01:18:05,060
And I also want to bring to our attention that you seem.

615
01:18:05,060 --> 01:18:18,290
In Africa, the colonialists, you know, especially the British, used to divide and rule policy quite well during the colonial times.

616
01:18:18,290 --> 01:18:25,190
So for instance, in Africa, Kenya, for instance, you know, they played those ethnic groups against each other.

617
01:18:25,190 --> 01:18:35,060
Those 44 ethnic groups, the Britons played them against each other, played the key coups against the laws and laws against the lawyers,

618
01:18:35,060 --> 01:18:42,470
the lawyers against the Mercedes, so as to perpetuate their rule, so to speak, right?

619
01:18:42,470 --> 01:18:47,600
So their policy of divide and rule worked very, very well.

620
01:18:47,600 --> 01:18:53,480
And it is still reflected even up to today.

621
01:18:53,480 --> 01:18:58,130
Kenya is over as hard as political independence for over 50 years.

622
01:18:58,130 --> 01:19:05,320
It was in 1963. But that ethnicity, you know, tribalism is still there.

623
01:19:05,320 --> 01:19:12,920
And because of that, what the Britain did during the colonial rule that you find that in Kenya,

624
01:19:12,920 --> 01:19:19,250
for instance, with the introduction of multiparty, which is something nice.

625
01:19:19,250 --> 01:19:23,540
All right. OK. It served democracy very well.

626
01:19:23,540 --> 01:19:34,880
But you find the introduction of multiparty in Kenya, for instance, because there are several parties, but those parties are ethnic based.

627
01:19:34,880 --> 01:19:40,280
You find that the this particular ethnic group has their party.

628
01:19:40,280 --> 01:19:47,960
This other one has theirs so that you see, when it comes to elections, you realise in Kenya, for instance,

629
01:19:47,960 --> 01:19:54,650
elections are usually a very difficult period because that's when the tension, you know,

630
01:19:54,650 --> 01:20:01,080
these parties, you know, you know, they fight, you know, they kill each other or whatnot.

631
01:20:01,080 --> 01:20:04,850
And even after elections, they never accept the results.

632
01:20:04,850 --> 01:20:11,810
They fight and whatnot because of that ethnicity, you know, which was instilled during the colonial days.

633
01:20:11,810 --> 01:20:16,830
And you see, that was one thing which really troubles Odetta.

634
01:20:16,830 --> 01:20:27,800
Ruka know that each time Kenya gets round elections, there would always be tension amongst the because there's nothing unifying Kenyans.

635
01:20:27,800 --> 01:20:35,270
And you see even the way the boundaries in Africans in Africa was made left a lot to be desired.

636
01:20:35,270 --> 01:20:44,150
So for instance, in Kenya, I come I belong to the ethnic group, but you find that the laws are in Kenya.

637
01:20:44,150 --> 01:20:52,340
Some are in Uganda, somewhere in Tanzania. Some are found in Sudan, even if you appear OK.

638
01:20:52,340 --> 01:21:05,530
But you see, so in Kenya, you find that the law in Kenya feels closer to the law in Uganda than to a Kikuyu who is a Kenyan like him.

639
01:21:05,530 --> 01:21:17,860
All right. Or actually in Uganda feels closer to a law in Kenya than to buy your window in Uganda.

640
01:21:17,860 --> 01:21:31,910
So the aim of philosophic the sagacity was to unify bring some kind of unity within African nations states.

641
01:21:31,910 --> 01:21:43,850
Well, this is a perfect Segway, I think, into now focus, turning to focus on Cobra and there on your work on him because as you mentioned earlier,

642
01:21:43,850 --> 01:21:48,140
Cobra like Haruka and probably like most philosophers, if we're honest,

643
01:21:48,140 --> 01:21:57,170
developed theoretical ideas in response to a concrete situation and one strand that relates very closely to what we've been looking at,

644
01:21:57,170 --> 01:22:02,960
a Rucker's work is his conception of authenticity and his theory of culture.

645
01:22:02,960 --> 01:22:13,790
So said, could you please speak for a few minutes about first of all, what is this discourse of culture and modernism that you reference from Taiwo?

646
01:22:13,790 --> 01:22:19,160
And then why do you think Cabral is a cultural modernist, right?

647
01:22:19,160 --> 01:22:28,870
Thank you so much. So in terms of the kind of framing philosophical structures.

648
01:22:28,870 --> 01:22:33,020
So if we take the philosophical discourse of modernity and hit them following

649
01:22:33,020 --> 01:22:38,420
all of Amitai was accounting his how colonialism came to modernity in Africa,

650
01:22:38,420 --> 01:22:47,390
which I think was published in 2010. So, so Taiwo identifies three elements of the philosophical discourse of modernity.

651
01:22:47,390 --> 01:22:52,610
And my argument in the in the in the paper, which was published on capitalist philosophy of culture,

652
01:22:52,610 --> 01:22:59,270
was precisely that we find those three principles instantiated and Cameron's thinking.

653
01:22:59,270 --> 01:23:06,970
So the three principles, very. Very succinctly, also the principle of subjectivity,

654
01:23:06,970 --> 01:23:13,270
so so there is this idea that what distinguishes modernity as a historical epoch and as a philosophical

655
01:23:13,270 --> 01:23:20,270
discourse is the archaeological importance assigned to an individual's ability to choose to do with it,

656
01:23:20,270 --> 01:23:23,080
to choose what to do with their lives.

657
01:23:23,080 --> 01:23:34,390
So this idea of self-determination, some people, you know, if that sort of cantons, they speak about it in terms of self legislation.

658
01:23:34,390 --> 01:23:40,990
And I argue, if you look at comparable sort of directives in the context of the party,

659
01:23:40,990 --> 01:23:49,930
he thinks of the party's role as basically helping people set up structures that would enable them to govern themselves.

660
01:23:49,930 --> 01:23:54,920
And the second element is that they will call it the central city of reason.

661
01:23:54,920 --> 01:24:03,250
So by that, I mean that for the subject of modernity, any given, you know, a set of institutions,

662
01:24:03,250 --> 01:24:11,240
webs of beliefs or practises can be regarded as legitimate only if and only one can produce reasons good reasons then justify its existence.

663
01:24:11,240 --> 01:24:17,410
So think about it this way. The fact that an institutional belief has always existed.

664
01:24:17,410 --> 01:24:22,750
It's inhabited, for example, is not regarded as sufficient for its justification.

665
01:24:22,750 --> 01:24:32,290
Now, of course, a consequence of this idea is that modern science, insofar as it embodies human rationality, is an important evaluative standard.

666
01:24:32,290 --> 01:24:38,200
You know, when it comes to assessing beliefs that you know, seek or purport to describe the natural world.

667
01:24:38,200 --> 01:24:43,630
And the third element is, is the belief in progress or. And by that,

668
01:24:43,630 --> 01:24:50,920
I just mean that individuals and societies that believe in progress as a kind of normative ideal or future are

669
01:24:50,920 --> 01:24:59,770
primarily future oriented in the sense that they consciously seek to change their social and vitamins for the better.

670
01:24:59,770 --> 01:25:07,510
So this means that the orientation towards existing institutions is not primarily one of preservation.

671
01:25:07,510 --> 01:25:15,430
It's not the destruction of preservation, but it's almost this attempt to always seek to improve existing social arrangements.

672
01:25:15,430 --> 01:25:21,760
And basically, I argue that income wc all these three elements in his thought, he doesn't set out explicitly.

673
01:25:21,760 --> 01:25:27,790
But when you read through his various concrete pronouncements and analysis of specific situations,

674
01:25:27,790 --> 01:25:33,460
you'll find that he more or less adheres to these views. So what does that mean for culture?

675
01:25:33,460 --> 01:25:45,790
Briefly. So, so that means I think for the that he has this historical view of culture, he sees it as something that changes as a function of time.

676
01:25:45,790 --> 01:25:53,320
And he sees it as something that can be changed based on collective goals that people agree upon.

677
01:25:53,320 --> 01:25:57,730
And to this extent, he's sort of tying it to a specific political project.

678
01:25:57,730 --> 01:26:01,600
I mean, obviously, his specific context was a war of national liberation.

679
01:26:01,600 --> 01:26:09,790
I mean, we should keep that in mind. But but he doesn't see it as the kind of interesting historical context or Isaiah Brown sort

680
01:26:09,790 --> 01:26:17,230
of emphasising that culture can change and that we shouldn't have these essentialist views.

681
01:26:17,230 --> 01:26:26,350
Because if you look at what the Portuguese were doing, so a lot of the people leading people in the IGC were from Cape Verde and there was already.

682
01:26:26,350 --> 01:26:32,230
Professor Chang mentioned this colonial ploy of attempting to divide and rule essentially.

683
01:26:32,230 --> 01:26:38,920
So the Portuguese government had sort of presented the Cape Verdeans as relatively

684
01:26:38,920 --> 01:26:44,140
privileged relative to other people who live in the mainland in Guinea-Bissau.

685
01:26:44,140 --> 01:26:46,720
Hmm. And Cabral was of Cape Verde in the sense.

686
01:26:46,720 --> 01:26:56,890
And so so as most of the leadership, but also the Portuguese would essentially claim that, you know, Cabral is not ideal misogyny,

687
01:26:56,890 --> 01:27:03,420
and he's not really an ideal member of that community because, for example, he doesn't speak land, for example.

688
01:27:03,420 --> 01:27:08,740
Then they say, Look, you know, he's he's just he's speaking in either Creole or Portuguese.

689
01:27:08,740 --> 01:27:13,600
And Cabral says, Look, well, what's significant in our context isn't the language that they speak.

690
01:27:13,600 --> 01:27:22,030
What's significant is OK, the kind of contribution that you're making you know, to to to free people from under colonial rule.

691
01:27:22,030 --> 01:27:28,390
In this specific context, because there were the Portuguese with essentially have these counter political organisations that

692
01:27:28,390 --> 01:27:36,630
they would foster who would sort of use the banner of authenticity to undermine the PR agency.

693
01:27:36,630 --> 01:27:42,610
So, so that's sort of like a very brief overview of the historical context.

694
01:27:42,610 --> 01:27:52,250
Is it fair to say then, that Kabras conception of what it is to be authentic is linked to rationality and to national autonomy?

695
01:27:52,250 --> 01:27:57,930
Yes, yes. I would say so, I mean, doesn't really use the discourse of authenticity.

696
01:27:57,930 --> 01:28:07,130
So he talks about returning to the roots, which which is in which I don't think is necessarily the same thing as a question of authenticity.

697
01:28:07,130 --> 01:28:14,510
But definitely there is this idea that to be really, you know, so he makes okay.

698
01:28:14,510 --> 01:28:20,630
I'll give you an example. He makes this distinction between somebody who belongs to the population and somebody who belongs to the people.

699
01:28:20,630 --> 01:28:26,570
So for him, you belong to a population if you're born in Guinea-Bissau. OK, that's just that's a fact.

700
01:28:26,570 --> 01:28:30,770
You know, it's part of the population. And that's the fact that you have no control over.

701
01:28:30,770 --> 01:28:34,160
It was a smaller but belonging to the people, he said.

702
01:28:34,160 --> 01:28:41,000
Is sort of when you participate in this collective struggle for liberation.

703
01:28:41,000 --> 01:28:46,460
So you could conceivably be a member of the population and not be a member of the people.

704
01:28:46,460 --> 01:28:51,890
According to that distinction and vice versa, you could be a member of a, you know,

705
01:28:51,890 --> 01:28:56,030
you could belong to the people by participating in the struggle even though you were born somewhere else.

706
01:28:56,030 --> 01:29:01,960
Maybe you wouldn't in Senegal and you'd be born and whatever, you know.

707
01:29:01,960 --> 01:29:08,890
OK, thank you. There's one more distinction, actually, that we'd like you to explain before we move on to the next section,

708
01:29:08,890 --> 01:29:15,730
which is this distinction you find in combat between cultural influence and cultural domination.

709
01:29:15,730 --> 01:29:24,790
And I think there's a there's a nice comparison to be made with the idea of defending culture against foreign values before you before it comes in.

710
01:29:24,790 --> 01:29:32,020
If I may make a comment, I like that distinction between being a member of a population and being a member of the people.

711
01:29:32,020 --> 01:29:39,670
It's a nice distinction. It has made me thinking in the sense that you see, I was born in Uganda,

712
01:29:39,670 --> 01:29:48,640
so it means I'm a member of the Ugandan population, but actually I'm a member of the Kenyan people.

713
01:29:48,640 --> 01:29:58,150
I just thought I wanted to share that. Yeah, yeah, that's that's that's sort of precisely what the distinction is supposed to draw,

714
01:29:58,150 --> 01:30:04,150
yeah, I'm happy that it resonates and that it makes sense, of course.

715
01:30:04,150 --> 01:30:11,020
So so the question was about cultural domination. And it's the distinction from cultural influence, correct?

716
01:30:11,020 --> 01:30:18,370
So, so, so okay. So here's the thing so Cabral wants to social and cultural thinking.

717
01:30:18,370 --> 01:30:23,930
There is always this idea of idea of a return to history.

718
01:30:23,930 --> 01:30:31,790
And and so for Cabral, having one's own history doesn't mean that one doesn't adopt safe techniques, practises and beliefs from other peoples.

719
01:30:31,790 --> 01:30:39,500
It means that one is free as much as possible to decide if and when to adopt techniques, practises and beliefs from other peoples.

720
01:30:39,500 --> 01:30:46,220
Whereas when you think about cultural domination, obviously it involves a kind of undermining of one's autonomy.

721
01:30:46,220 --> 01:30:53,150
I mean, it's in the need to dominate somebody is to impose your will upon them and so on through coercion,

722
01:30:53,150 --> 01:31:03,290
but maybe through, you know, less directly coercive means. So a relationship of cultural domination is one in which the dominated party doesn't really

723
01:31:03,290 --> 01:31:08,430
have any choice over whether or not to accept the cultural elements that are imposed upon it.

724
01:31:08,430 --> 01:31:12,300
So think about, you know, the acquisition of a language, other people, they don't really have a choice.

725
01:31:12,300 --> 01:31:18,630
You know, you just say, Look, you're going to whatever speak Portuguese, French, and that's it.

726
01:31:18,630 --> 01:31:22,700
Whereas cultural influence, of course. You know, if you look at human history, humans have always, you know,

727
01:31:22,700 --> 01:31:29,000
humans living in different cultures have always been influenced with one by one another and not necessarily through domination,

728
01:31:29,000 --> 01:31:34,520
you know, so people see some invention, some technique that they think, OK, this could be useful for us.

729
01:31:34,520 --> 01:31:40,370
And they borrow it so heated the element of coercion and of inequalities absinthe.

730
01:31:40,370 --> 01:31:44,120
So essentially, Cabral wants to see this is right for Cabral.

731
01:31:44,120 --> 01:31:51,950
It's interesting to think about it this way. You know, the struggle for independence is actually one that gets you to a situation where you can

732
01:31:51,950 --> 01:31:56,390
have these relations of cultural influence instead of traditions of cultural domination.

733
01:31:56,390 --> 01:32:02,960
So it's not about closing in upon itself, it's about being in a position where now we can talk as equal interlocutors.

734
01:32:02,960 --> 01:32:10,790
And I could freely, freely bottle or not borrow from you. Depends on whether I find it convincing or not useful or not.

735
01:32:10,790 --> 01:32:16,400
Yes. So that, in a nutshell, is the distinction. OK, great.

736
01:32:16,400 --> 01:32:21,260
One reason we've brought these two strands together is that Cabal and Oracle both have this

737
01:32:21,260 --> 01:32:28,280
project of cultivating a national culture that is either authentic or truly autonomous.

738
01:32:28,280 --> 01:32:33,590
So this is an open question for either of you, but we might start with Z.

739
01:32:33,590 --> 01:32:40,250
What do you think Cobra would have thought about a Rukus project of uncovering a national

740
01:32:40,250 --> 01:32:48,980
philosophy because they both have this interest in enabling critical dialogue and evaluation?

741
01:32:48,980 --> 01:32:54,030
But what about this idea of an implicit philosophy? Yes.

742
01:32:54,030 --> 01:32:57,930
Very briefly, so I don't know if I have much to say about what corporal would have thought

743
01:32:57,930 --> 01:33:03,480
about that simply because so corporal doesn't really speak explicitly about,

744
01:33:03,480 --> 01:33:08,430
you know, a national philosophy, but he's definitely interested in national culture, right?

745
01:33:08,430 --> 01:33:10,740
As so so in creating a national culture as well.

746
01:33:10,740 --> 01:33:17,370
Because in Guinea-Bissau, of course, there are also there was also a multiplicity of ethnic groups who will have different modes of life,

747
01:33:17,370 --> 01:33:24,290
who had different relations with the Portuguese colonial administration and.

748
01:33:24,290 --> 01:33:31,500
And so to the extent that you look as interested in developing this, this unifying cultural project,

749
01:33:31,500 --> 01:33:37,770
of course, this would be something that would have been interested in.

750
01:33:37,770 --> 01:33:47,700
And specifically also the kind of the political project or social project and the background of Lucas as a project.

751
01:33:47,700 --> 01:33:53,310
I think that would also be something that you can find similarities between it and capitalism project.

752
01:33:53,310 --> 01:34:01,450
Yeah, I I'll just leave it at that. Thank. What did you have any thoughts?

753
01:34:01,450 --> 01:34:13,360
Not really, but what I would just emphasise is that you see, for Deborah Ruka, culture and philosophy go together to have this national culture.

754
01:34:13,360 --> 01:34:18,100
You need this philosophy behind it to strengthen it.

755
01:34:18,100 --> 01:34:28,860
So but of course, he was a trained philosopher, so one would understand why he's emphasising on the philosophy.

756
01:34:28,860 --> 01:34:32,460
OK, that I think I'll pass over to Scarlett.

757
01:34:32,460 --> 01:34:39,750
We'd like to finish with seeing where the conversation takes you, but to begin by comparing their approaches to serving culture.

758
01:34:39,750 --> 01:34:44,070
Yeah. So as previously discussed, Erica, you know,

759
01:34:44,070 --> 01:34:54,200
he hoped that national projects on philosophic sagacity would protect African nations from kind of I'm reflectively adopting harmful foreign values.

760
01:34:54,200 --> 01:35:01,410
And as I think of projects that area, he believes that, you know,

761
01:35:01,410 --> 01:35:08,640
today that is that is the case that lots of Africans have adopted these kind of foreign values.

762
01:35:08,640 --> 01:35:16,080
And BresaGen gives technological morality as an example of a firm value that is potentially dangerous to African societies.

763
01:35:16,080 --> 01:35:21,330
I guess the concern is this kind of assumption that because something is, you know,

764
01:35:21,330 --> 01:35:27,090
more to give answers better and we want to look at the real content of the thank in stats.

765
01:35:27,090 --> 01:35:33,960
Yes. So just briefly in terms of the question of technological morality.

766
01:35:33,960 --> 01:35:43,290
So with respect to Cabral, you know, because I think this happens quite a bit and some of the secondary literature on cultural world

767
01:35:43,290 --> 01:35:49,410
modernity as a kind of philosophical discourse and gets associated with modernisation theory.

768
01:35:49,410 --> 01:35:54,990
So people think that, you know, some things when I'm seeing that Cabral was a cultural modernist or a modernist in the

769
01:35:54,990 --> 01:36:00,590
realm of philosophy of culture that he was also an adherent to modernisation theory.

770
01:36:00,590 --> 01:36:13,740
So modernisation theory, of course, was a theory of development or beach that sort of the kind of poster book for it, as well as those rosters.

771
01:36:13,740 --> 01:36:22,860
1960 book the stages of Economic Growth A Non Communist Manifesto, so you could see like the Cold War context and the subtitle.

772
01:36:22,860 --> 01:36:24,450
And according to this theory, I mean,

773
01:36:24,450 --> 01:36:34,830
one of the themes that the developing foetus so adopted this account advanced is this idea that, you know, you know,

774
01:36:34,830 --> 01:36:44,400
having a modern society means that you have to start sort of reinvesting surplus from the agricultural sphere into industry located in urban centres.

775
01:36:44,400 --> 01:36:51,330
So that's, for example, something that are rejected. I mean, he thought that for the foreseeable future,

776
01:36:51,330 --> 01:36:59,850
it just it was more practical and more equitable to focus on development in rural areas and Guinea-Bissau.

777
01:36:59,850 --> 01:37:03,280
So, so there is also capital, for example,

778
01:37:03,280 --> 01:37:11,100
was very close to what we today call agro ecology saw this idea that our agricultural practises shouldn't be sort of directed against nature,

779
01:37:11,100 --> 01:37:15,690
but rather to work with it in order to prevent things like soil degradation.

780
01:37:15,690 --> 01:37:20,010
You could see that in his writings because he was trained as an agronomist,

781
01:37:20,010 --> 01:37:25,770
and he was really he was actually interested in how sort of colonial monoculture, for example, degrades the soil.

782
01:37:25,770 --> 01:37:32,040
So there is definitely a sense in which he's not some kind of Promethean technological modernist when he says,

783
01:37:32,040 --> 01:37:36,660
Okay, any kind of technological development is OK.

784
01:37:36,660 --> 01:37:41,610
You know, we should go ahead and adopt it or implement it.

785
01:37:41,610 --> 01:37:48,950
Yeah, yeah. So so so that that's that's I think the distinction to be made there with else.

786
01:37:48,950 --> 01:37:57,980
Yeah, absolutely. That reminds me of I've got a quote here from Carol, which I think it's quite nicely with this idea that logical morality, which is,

787
01:37:57,980 --> 01:38:04,100
you know, the most important thing for the liberation movement is not to test the uniqueness and not not uniqueness of the popular culture,

788
01:38:04,100 --> 01:38:10,970
but to undertake its critical analysis as a function of the needs of the state of struggle and progress,

789
01:38:10,970 --> 01:38:16,820
rather than just assuming something is better because it is unique or because it is new.

790
01:38:16,820 --> 01:38:25,550
I mean, I may be adopting this wrong, but you know, I have a look at the actual needs of the people and the needs of the the liberation movement.

791
01:38:25,550 --> 01:38:33,500
I was this kind of idea of progress was just tell me a little bit, and I was wondering the question before us urging,

792
01:38:33,500 --> 01:38:39,170
you know, would Haruka have thought in terms of progress, do you think or what he articulated, what he views that time?

793
01:38:39,170 --> 01:38:41,930
Would you have articulated his vision differently?

794
01:38:41,930 --> 01:38:50,450
And the question for both of you, what do you think or what do your respective authors think constituted real social progress?

795
01:38:50,450 --> 01:38:54,150
What was the kind of essence of that? All right.

796
01:38:54,150 --> 01:39:01,020
I'll go first. I wish there was it was like, well, I think so.

797
01:39:01,020 --> 01:39:05,640
But anyway, I'll try and answer it on his behalf right now.

798
01:39:05,640 --> 01:39:13,220
What I would say is that order or Ruka was really not hostile.

799
01:39:13,220 --> 01:39:15,980
To non-African cultures.

800
01:39:15,980 --> 01:39:30,660
Well, to start with and that and that is precisely why, unlike some scholars of African philosophy of his time, he did not join in the bond,

801
01:39:30,660 --> 01:39:39,750
the work of whether African philosophy is professional or was professional or not, whether it was unique or not.

802
01:39:39,750 --> 01:39:42,230
No, he did not go that route.

803
01:39:42,230 --> 01:39:57,830
Most scholars of his time tried fitting themselves in either one of the two solutions offered regarding the nature of African philosophy or order,

804
01:39:57,830 --> 01:40:06,530
or Ruka, on his part, came up, as I've already said, with the four friends in African philosophy.

805
01:40:06,530 --> 01:40:12,510
So, according to him, African philosophy.

806
01:40:12,510 --> 01:40:24,360
Her fortress in that it could be approached in four different ways, in other words, his view accommodates topic themes,

807
01:40:24,360 --> 01:40:40,170
methodologies which others would argue below typically to Western philosophy or dare, or Ruka held African values and cultures in high regard.

808
01:40:40,170 --> 01:40:47,730
There's no doubt about that. But he did not romanticise them.

809
01:40:47,730 --> 01:40:57,410
I would say that his view resembled that of. Kwame Nkrumah, you know, well.

810
01:40:57,410 --> 01:41:03,290
There are three competing ideologies in Africa.

811
01:41:03,290 --> 01:41:10,460
So the idea is to harmonise those three competing ideologies.

812
01:41:10,460 --> 01:41:20,210
However, the emergent emergent ideology should be based on the African way of life in his language.

813
01:41:20,210 --> 01:41:25,680
One African personality in a way.

814
01:41:25,680 --> 01:41:33,780
That is what Auditor Ruka has in mind when it talks about harmonisation.

815
01:41:33,780 --> 01:41:46,260
Of. National cultures into national philosophy when decisions come together so as to harmonise those aspects.

816
01:41:46,260 --> 01:41:53,830
Of their cultures that are in conflict when you take into account as well.

817
01:41:53,830 --> 01:42:01,210
non-African cultures, so long as they are not a threat.

818
01:42:01,210 --> 01:42:05,950
To the African pedestal, so to speak.

819
01:42:05,950 --> 01:42:10,740
So, in other words, he would not. Privilege.

820
01:42:10,740 --> 01:42:26,220
One of the three ideologies over the other, so long as it was projected a projection was towards the benefit of humanity, so to speak.

821
01:42:26,220 --> 01:42:32,540
Yes, I did. You have any comments on this idea of social progress?

822
01:42:32,540 --> 01:42:46,010
Yes. So I think so for for the camera, all the social and social progress basically involves sort of removing as many of the impediments as possible,

823
01:42:46,010 --> 01:42:58,430
impediments to human beings being able to sort of act as a collective makers of their own history to put it in a kind of Marxist terms.

824
01:42:58,430 --> 01:43:05,630
And that obviously involves improving material conditions.

825
01:43:05,630 --> 01:43:14,900
It also involves removing what we can call so there are no material impediments, such as, for example, certain, you know,

826
01:43:14,900 --> 01:43:27,140
false beliefs about, you know, in the natural world or about human relations, which obviously exist in both, you know, in all societies.

827
01:43:27,140 --> 01:43:35,340
Yes. So it is very much geared towards this view that, you know, humans should be able to sort of almost create themselves.

828
01:43:35,340 --> 01:43:42,980
So there's again, a kind of Promethean element, but not necessarily in that kind of ecologically destructive sense.

829
01:43:42,980 --> 01:43:48,870
And I think that's sort of what he understands might be social progress. That's great, thank you.

830
01:43:48,870 --> 01:43:50,490
Thank you so much for the.

831
01:43:50,490 --> 01:44:01,870
Yeah, I think I'm going to move over to OK, now I've got a couple of questions on kind of the institutional pedagogical side that concerns me.

832
01:44:01,870 --> 01:44:12,220
Yes, so to wrap up this discussion, we'd like to link this back to another theme of the journal to which this podcast is an introduction.

833
01:44:12,220 --> 01:44:20,880
This theme is the values of our education. Unfortunately, at this point, we began having problems with Cheng's microphone,

834
01:44:20,880 --> 01:44:27,590
but we hope you listen on to his dad's thoughts and teaching philosophy and making research accessible.

835
01:44:27,590 --> 01:44:36,470
Maybe that you could begin. Do you have specific ideas about how this material should be taught?

836
01:44:36,470 --> 01:44:40,760
Yes, obviously, I don't have the teaching experience of Professor Cheng,

837
01:44:40,760 --> 01:44:49,760
so I'm going to be very brief in terms of what I see because I think you'll have a lot more to say about this.

838
01:44:49,760 --> 01:44:56,120
But yeah, so right now, for example, I'm planning a course on modern African intellectual history.

839
01:44:56,120 --> 01:45:04,610
And I think one problem is a lot of this material, it's not that it doesn't, doesn't get taught and doesn't get thought.

840
01:45:04,610 --> 01:45:14,180
This philosophy, which I think becomes a bit of a problem and becomes a kind of case studies, for example, in anthropology, sort of.

841
01:45:14,180 --> 01:45:16,220
It's the kind of first order discourse.

842
01:45:16,220 --> 01:45:23,030
And then you're supposed to come up with a kind of theoretical discourse that referred us back to it as primary material.

843
01:45:23,030 --> 01:45:32,060
At least that's the case, I think, and in the way it's often thought in North America and in, you know,

844
01:45:32,060 --> 01:45:41,990
African studies and anthropology, which I think becomes a bit of a problem because so people read Cabral,

845
01:45:41,990 --> 01:45:48,720
for example, because they don't learn, they want to learn about sort of the history of Guinea-Bissau with that period in time, which is fine.

846
01:45:48,720 --> 01:45:54,740
Guinea-Bissau and competitive, it's just fine. But then they don't take on the actual ideas, take them seriously.

847
01:45:54,740 --> 01:45:59,330
And of course, but by taking them seriously, we don't mean, you know, we should celebrate them or something.

848
01:45:59,330 --> 01:46:06,420
But obviously critical engagement, actually thinking through the arguments, attempting to reconstruct the arguments and so on.

849
01:46:06,420 --> 01:46:17,020
Can I ask each of you, what are your practises beyond academia and interpret this as broadly as you want to?

850
01:46:17,020 --> 01:46:23,740
Oh, remarkably well. Oh, what I usually do.

851
01:46:23,740 --> 01:46:28,360
Who the [INAUDIBLE] is this?

852
01:46:28,360 --> 01:46:35,140
Well, I usually conduct public lectures.

853
01:46:35,140 --> 01:46:57,970
Yes, I go to schools, primary schools with you telling you how to oh, the it's important for the health of all the school principals as well.

854
01:46:57,970 --> 01:47:08,710
And also whenever I visit to visit, if you are there, you would remove all visit.

855
01:47:08,710 --> 01:47:22,980
How would you like to go to the village in the village and hub because you have told me this and also other places to.

856
01:47:22,980 --> 01:47:29,470
Yes, so in terms of practises outside academia, so.

857
01:47:29,470 --> 01:47:31,450
So I mean, this doesn't really count,

858
01:47:31,450 --> 01:47:39,040
but I suppose it comes in the context I'm in because obviously I study at the North American University and I write mostly in English.

859
01:47:39,040 --> 01:47:47,350
But you know, I have this interest in making sure that contemporary African philosophy from other parts of the African

860
01:47:47,350 --> 01:47:54,550
continent is accessible to to people in North Africa because many people don't don't really study there.

861
01:47:54,550 --> 01:47:59,860
So I try to write in Arabic as well. So for it, for the various outlets.

862
01:47:59,860 --> 01:48:10,060
And recently, actually, we did this, we did the bookshop that in Arabic, on Cambrils thought and philosophy.

863
01:48:10,060 --> 01:48:17,450
So that was a good, you know, the book was published in Cairo, but was distributed in Sudan as well, and in Tunisia and Morocco.

864
01:48:17,450 --> 01:48:25,630
I think it will be distributed this one in terms of non-academic stuff.

865
01:48:25,630 --> 01:48:33,190
So again, you know, I try to make time for as much public engagement as possible.

866
01:48:33,190 --> 01:48:40,310
So, you know, like podcasts like this, for example, because I think it makes the research accessible.

867
01:48:40,310 --> 01:48:46,520
And finally, I think we'll makes these last two questions together, so.

868
01:48:46,520 --> 01:48:55,100
What is your well, what is your main takeaway from the discussion today and an optional question if if there's something you'd like to say on it?

869
01:48:55,100 --> 01:49:01,480
What is the biggest problem facing African philosophy today? Yes.

870
01:49:01,480 --> 01:49:12,900
I mean, I don't really have a lot to add, but I just want to reiterate what professor watching has emphasised the importance to the

871
01:49:12,900 --> 01:49:19,520
importance of making sure that African philosophy is being taught in as many places as possible.

872
01:49:19,520 --> 01:49:28,020
Um, and and you know, it's it's this is sort of a general comment, but you see today that a lot of struggles about,

873
01:49:28,020 --> 01:49:35,040
you know, the structure of syllabi and North American and European universities, the way they sometimes get interpreted.

874
01:49:35,040 --> 01:49:40,260
It's as if, you know, we're telling people, no, you know, think Aristotle of the syllabus or something like that,

875
01:49:40,260 --> 01:49:45,750
but it's really about integrating more elements and reframing pre-existing elements because there is a way in which,

876
01:49:45,750 --> 01:49:52,860
you know, some people seek the kind of decolonising discourse to mean, well, you don't want us to teach grant or something.

877
01:49:52,860 --> 01:50:00,030
But of course, you know, that's that's not the point. It's about context to reframing and drawing these connexions.

878
01:50:00,030 --> 01:50:06,150
So I think, for example, must always work on like Augustine as a North African philosopher of late antiquity.

879
01:50:06,150 --> 01:50:16,890
So I guess that's a kind of reframing of of a pre-existing canonical figure or reason to work on Wilhelm Amo, for example,

880
01:50:16,890 --> 01:50:27,030
early modern philosophers from the Gold Coast who was in Germany and who sort of obviously involved in these in debates

881
01:50:27,030 --> 01:50:33,450
about the relationship between the mind and between the mind and the body in the context of early modern philosophy.

882
01:50:33,450 --> 01:50:40,450
So, so again, it's really this reframing and rethinking of connexions and parallels.

883
01:50:40,450 --> 01:50:48,460
Thank you for that. Finally, is there any main takeaways you have from the discussion today or from the preparation you did?

884
01:50:48,460 --> 01:50:53,640
I start off. In reading Z's essay on some of the Lotus writers,

885
01:50:53,640 --> 01:51:00,470
I was perhaps embarrassingly surprised at the point you made that to be modern is not to be western.

886
01:51:00,470 --> 01:51:04,740
And there's a strong association between those two, but it really doesn't make sense to equate them.

887
01:51:04,740 --> 01:51:11,250
And I was surprised when you said that to realise the extent to which I do equate those things and reflectivity.

888
01:51:11,250 --> 01:51:16,280
So that's the thing that you've taught me the most. Yeah.

889
01:51:16,280 --> 01:51:27,860
I mean, so I learnt a lot from this discussion, from both your questions and from Professor Cheng's interventions and answers.

890
01:51:27,860 --> 01:51:28,570
Yeah, I mean,

891
01:51:28,570 --> 01:51:41,020
the thing I would pick out as something that they've learnt that became very clear to me is the way that Oracle's programme of siege philosophy is,

892
01:51:41,020 --> 01:51:48,050
is an attempt to sort of balance the criticisms that were levelled at the ethno philosopher just by the professional philosophers,

893
01:51:48,050 --> 01:51:56,090
while also not not assuming that the existing African intellectual discourses do not possess individual

894
01:51:56,090 --> 01:52:02,960
thinkers who are able to engage in second order critical thinking about existing beliefs AI.

895
01:52:02,960 --> 01:52:07,250
So that's been very helpful for me in terms of in terms of how we think.

896
01:52:07,250 --> 01:52:31,790
Thank you. Well, you know, the Sochi Olympics before, and this is just one culture in the world where you always be.

897
01:52:31,790 --> 01:52:43,810
Be close to one. One of the most exclusive of mobile.

898
01:52:43,810 --> 01:52:54,840
Well, thank you for watching that and Scott, it. It really was a pleasure to meet and share this conversation.

899
01:52:54,840 --> 01:53:04,200
Thank you for making room for the possibility of strengthening me or contesting in three months and no consideration.

900
01:53:04,200 --> 01:53:17,130
Maybe that's the entire baby nature allows teams to cry with you and you possibly the next.

901
01:53:17,130 --> 01:53:29,726
Pecks you then.