1 00:00:03,320 --> 00:00:06,380 Hello, everyone, and welcome to the Oxford Martin School. 2 00:00:06,410 --> 00:00:14,120 My name's Charles Godfrey, the director. Uh, I'm going to hand over in a moment to our master of ceremonies this afternoon, Ricardo Suarez. 3 00:00:14,480 --> 00:00:18,080 Uh, Ricardo runs, uh, program in African governance. 4 00:00:18,410 --> 00:00:22,640 But just before doing that, I'd like to add, um, my. Welcome to the minister. 5 00:00:23,180 --> 00:00:30,590 Um, the Right Honourable Andrew Andrew Mitchell, who's managed to find time to come up today on Budget day, which we are very grateful for. 6 00:00:30,890 --> 00:00:33,709 And actually, I think it's, uh, Andrew's second visit here. 7 00:00:33,710 --> 00:00:42,770 We had a wonderful program in which Andrew and Margaret Hodge, uh, discussed issues around, uh, uh, money flow and, uh, development. 8 00:00:43,040 --> 00:00:50,660 And I would also very much like to welcome the ambassador of Portugal to the United Kingdom, who's in the audience this afternoon. 9 00:00:51,050 --> 00:00:57,170 So with no more do let me hand over to Ricardo. Thank you, Charles, and, uh, welcome, everyone. 10 00:00:57,860 --> 00:01:04,850 Um, in November 2023, the foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office launched an international development white paper 11 00:01:05,360 --> 00:01:11,210 setting out areas for action across a broad range of development themes and policy areas. 12 00:01:11,750 --> 00:01:18,410 The White Paper does not include new spending commitments, but it is the first UK White paper in 14 years. 13 00:01:19,910 --> 00:01:26,450 It marks a turning point after the turmoil created by the 2021 aid cuts and the 14 00:01:26,450 --> 00:01:31,530 earlier Foreign Office Department for International Development merger two, 15 00:01:31,580 --> 00:01:34,790 we still call it a merger, is that the technical expression, 16 00:01:35,480 --> 00:01:40,700 in particular the papers, provides a meticulous diagnostic of current challenges, 17 00:01:41,210 --> 00:01:47,510 especially in regard to climate change and the way in which geopolitical rivalry threatens to prevent coordination. 18 00:01:47,510 --> 00:01:50,090 To address this and other pressing agendas, 19 00:01:50,870 --> 00:01:57,560 the White Paper recognises the increasingly contested world we face with a more complicated and fractured environment, 20 00:01:57,890 --> 00:02:01,670 as well as the imperative of learning to navigate these challenges. 21 00:02:02,420 --> 00:02:08,059 Today's discussion will consider how to mobilise additional resources for impact when 22 00:02:08,060 --> 00:02:14,330 fiscal and political conditions in the UK and traditional donor partners are unfavourable, 23 00:02:15,050 --> 00:02:22,550 how to work with new and emerging donors and balance the need for more funds against the UK's commitment to its values. 24 00:02:23,180 --> 00:02:30,680 We will also discuss how to manoeuvre in the context of the wide choices of finance now available to most recipient countries, 25 00:02:31,010 --> 00:02:35,540 often with very different terms and conditions than those put forward by the UK. 26 00:02:35,750 --> 00:02:40,190 And finally, we will look at how to balance a focus on climate mitigation, 27 00:02:40,550 --> 00:02:47,570 which is primarily concerned for middle income countries with finance to tackle extreme poverty and climate adaptation, 28 00:02:48,170 --> 00:02:51,860 which is primarily the focus of the least developed countries. 29 00:02:52,310 --> 00:02:59,150 Uh, in order to do so, we are delighted to welcome Andrew Mitchell, the Minister for Saint for Development in Africa, 30 00:02:59,150 --> 00:03:06,470 to the Oxford Martin School to discuss the best way to address these challenges as well as seizing new opportunities. 31 00:03:06,800 --> 00:03:11,600 Andrew Mitchell was appointed to his present role in October 2022. 32 00:03:12,080 --> 00:03:16,970 He was previously Secretary of State for International Development from 2010 to 2012. 33 00:03:17,360 --> 00:03:24,919 He was elected conservative MP for Sutton Coldfield in 2001, and had a long and distinguished career in Parliament and government. 34 00:03:24,920 --> 00:03:34,820 Before that. He is joined on the panel by two distinguished Oxford academics, both of whom have vast experience in the development policy arena. 35 00:03:35,450 --> 00:03:43,850 Emily Jones is associate professor of public policy at the Blavatnik School of Government and the director of Global Economic Governance Programme. 36 00:03:44,480 --> 00:03:51,350 Her research examines the political economy of global trade and finance, and she's currently leading a research project on digital trade. 37 00:03:51,980 --> 00:03:55,820 She is a co-founder and co-director of the Trade and Public Policy Network, 38 00:03:55,820 --> 00:04:00,620 which seeks to foster engagement between academics and UK policymakers on trade, 39 00:04:00,920 --> 00:04:07,910 and recently served as a special of the specialist adviser to the Trade Select Committee in the UK Parliament. 40 00:04:08,360 --> 00:04:14,839 And further to the right, Stefan Derrick is co-director of the Oxford Martin Programme on African Governance, 41 00:04:14,840 --> 00:04:18,889 as well as of the Oxford Martin Programme on Systemic Resilience. 42 00:04:18,890 --> 00:04:24,410 He is Professor of Economic Policy at the School of Government and Economics Department, 43 00:04:24,410 --> 00:04:28,250 and director of the centre for African for the Study of African Economies. 44 00:04:28,250 --> 00:04:34,190 Between 2011 and 2017 he was Chief Economist at the Department of International Development. 45 00:04:34,190 --> 00:04:39,110 He has also served as Development Advisor to the Foreign Secretary. 46 00:04:39,290 --> 00:04:44,900 So without further ado, I would ask the Minister to come to the lecture to deliver his remarks. 47 00:04:48,620 --> 00:04:49,739 Well, thank you very much indeed. 48 00:04:49,740 --> 00:04:59,360 And that's, uh, wonderful to be back, uh, at this great school, uh, in the heart of the second greatest university in the world. 49 00:04:59,660 --> 00:05:08,399 Um, I, I love. Coming to Oxford and I've been I've spoken in this hall before and I've spoken with Stephen and his hall. 50 00:05:08,400 --> 00:05:12,360 I helped launch his brilliant book, which, if any of you haven't read it, 51 00:05:12,710 --> 00:05:17,100 it tells you that the most important single ingredient in development is leadership. 52 00:05:17,460 --> 00:05:23,940 Um, and it's a great, uh, read. Uh, also a great read is the white paper, um, and I, I can ask, 53 00:05:24,270 --> 00:05:29,220 can I ask how many people in this room put up your hand if you have seen the white paper or read it. 54 00:05:31,170 --> 00:05:32,340 Not not bad, not bad. 55 00:05:32,490 --> 00:05:42,180 I mean, I'm obviously very biased, but I think that the 143 pages of the white paper, uh, a real page turner, I think it's impossible to put down. 56 00:05:42,180 --> 00:05:49,680 But for those who do find it possible to put down, there's a Richard Curtis inspired, uh, 17 page which sets it all out. 57 00:05:49,680 --> 00:05:54,209 And the great thing about the white paper, it's been unbelievably well received. 58 00:05:54,210 --> 00:06:01,140 We never in our wildest expectations, as we were flat out for four months, um, to try and put it together. 59 00:06:01,140 --> 00:06:04,709 We never in our wildest dreams believed that it would get the reception. 60 00:06:04,710 --> 00:06:15,780 It got nearly 500 people in church House for the launch in London, and also the strong endorsement by 20 heads of government and heads of agencies, 61 00:06:16,080 --> 00:06:24,630 and also very considerable endorsement by the sector and and those of you who are part of who know the sector well, 62 00:06:24,960 --> 00:06:28,260 we know that that of itself is pretty unprecedented. 63 00:06:28,590 --> 00:06:36,630 Not an easy group to please. Um, and the strength of the white paper I submit to you is that it is all party. 64 00:06:36,660 --> 00:06:44,850 It has got the endorsement of the, uh, Labour Party and indeed of the SNP and of most of the liberals. 65 00:06:45,420 --> 00:06:51,600 Uh, not there are very many liberals, but it's got the endorsement of at least some of that people on the, on the front bench. 66 00:06:52,080 --> 00:06:57,300 Um, so, so it's all party. And of course that really matters because if it hadn't been an all party paper, 67 00:06:57,540 --> 00:07:01,950 firstly, these brilliant officials across Whitehall would not have engaged with us. 68 00:07:02,310 --> 00:07:10,980 Um, and secondly, it wouldn't have endured. So I think this is a, this is a, a paper that takes us to the to 2030. 69 00:07:11,220 --> 00:07:17,280 It will, at least in theory, survive the unlikely event of a change of government when the general election comes. 70 00:07:17,640 --> 00:07:26,250 Um, and, and, uh, I think that, uh, it's very helpful to get a bit of stability because as everyone in this room knows, development is long term. 71 00:07:26,700 --> 00:07:32,219 And the problem with the merger and the, uh, cuts in finance, um, 72 00:07:32,220 --> 00:07:39,030 is that those are short term measures which lead to short term effects and means that the taxpayer actually does not get value for money for, 73 00:07:39,390 --> 00:07:47,340 uh, development in the white Paper. Um, there is the, uh, at its heart, it's how do you get the SDGs back on track? 74 00:07:47,730 --> 00:07:50,550 Uh, at this halfway point, they're way off track to 2030. 75 00:07:50,730 --> 00:07:58,620 And secondly, the subject of this, uh, meeting, which is basically how you ramp up very significantly the amount of finance, 76 00:07:58,860 --> 00:08:04,740 uh, going into, uh, climate change addressing climate change and in particular, adaptation. 77 00:08:05,070 --> 00:08:09,600 Uh, and it talks very much, very easy to do mitigation projects in India. 78 00:08:09,600 --> 00:08:15,479 You can get the finance for that. It is the adaptation in poor countries which is really required. 79 00:08:15,480 --> 00:08:20,340 And, uh, Britain has taken up the co-chair of the Green Climate Fund, 80 00:08:20,340 --> 00:08:25,620 our prime Minister announced a $2 billion replenishment for the Green Climate Fund. 81 00:08:25,890 --> 00:08:30,720 And part of that is we want to support the new executive director, and we want to make sure, 82 00:08:30,990 --> 00:08:38,879 as I as I told her when I first met her, that, uh, we see adaptation projects going ahead in Somalia because that is the acid test. 83 00:08:38,880 --> 00:08:45,660 How do we do that? And also it launches the white paper has a strong section on humanitarianism. 84 00:08:45,660 --> 00:08:51,240 Where next financial year we will spend £1 billion, but also a new fund, 85 00:08:51,390 --> 00:08:56,790 the Resilience and Adaptation Fund, which I very much hope will be, uh, copied by others, 86 00:08:57,030 --> 00:09:03,690 which says this when you are dealing with a disaster, whether it's, uh, an earthquake or drought or famine, 87 00:09:04,080 --> 00:09:08,190 um, you want to try and make sure that these awful events next time they hit, 88 00:09:08,190 --> 00:09:17,519 which sadly they will, that there there's more resilience built into the system so that if you're moving water to an area by lorry, 89 00:09:17,520 --> 00:09:20,520 by water, but the next time you want to ensure that there's, 90 00:09:20,550 --> 00:09:29,550 uh, more irrigation, there's more, uh, water retention, more reservoir capacity, um, and of course, when humanitarians deploy, they won't do that. 91 00:09:29,550 --> 00:09:36,330 They will seek to use whatever funds and support they've got to ensure that, uh, they meet the need. 92 00:09:36,540 --> 00:09:42,600 The Resilience and Adaptation Fund is 15% of anything that is spent in a humanitarian disaster. 93 00:09:43,050 --> 00:09:48,900 Um, and, uh, allows for that separate process of resilience and adaptation to be built in. 94 00:09:48,930 --> 00:09:52,950 No, to the key points of this afternoon's, uh, discussion. 95 00:09:52,950 --> 00:09:57,150 I think, um, we we are trying to, uh, 96 00:09:57,420 --> 00:10:03,510 find the holy grail of the holy grail of climate finance turning billions and trillions is 97 00:10:03,510 --> 00:10:09,510 this you need to take the statist money that is the Multilateral development bank money, 98 00:10:09,720 --> 00:10:17,520 the, uh, DFI, uh, in Britain's case, by undoubtedly now the leading, uh, DFI in the world. 99 00:10:17,520 --> 00:10:22,259 You take the statist money and you link it with the private sector money, 100 00:10:22,260 --> 00:10:29,490 and in particular the $60 trillion of pension fund money, which, uh, if it understood the. 101 00:10:29,650 --> 00:10:35,680 Risk. If the risk could be alleviated or quantified very clearly. 102 00:10:35,890 --> 00:10:42,670 If they can see that they're going to get a return, many of the people whose pensions are managed want them to spend money, uh, 103 00:10:42,670 --> 00:10:48,490 in this area of climate finance, but they want to ensure that they don't lose their money and that they get a reasonable return. 104 00:10:48,640 --> 00:10:56,379 And that is why the marriage of the status money, which could do this to the private sector pension fund money is so very important. 105 00:10:56,380 --> 00:11:04,150 And we've been working closely through the brilliant team at the world Bank that we have the young and very dedicated who, 106 00:11:04,150 --> 00:11:09,629 um, who the president of the world Bank uses, I think, quite a lot as, uh, 107 00:11:09,630 --> 00:11:15,590 as sort of cabinet and a think tank using through them to try and find devices, which means that the, uh, 108 00:11:15,610 --> 00:11:19,540 financial engineering and knowledge which exists across the multilateral banks 109 00:11:19,750 --> 00:11:24,490 is brought together to maximise what they can do with their own balance sheets. 110 00:11:24,520 --> 00:11:31,419 Uh, my favourite example is that if you cut the capital adequacy for the ibid, uh, balance sheet, 111 00:11:31,420 --> 00:11:38,739 if you cut the capital adequacy from 20 to 19, that means they can lend an extra $4 billion, uh, every year. 112 00:11:38,740 --> 00:11:41,920 And if you take it down to 18, that's $8 billion. 113 00:11:41,920 --> 00:11:45,459 You can't obviously continue that process all the way or it would work. 114 00:11:45,460 --> 00:11:49,420 The ratings agencies wouldn't be happy. But but there are lots of things they could do. 115 00:11:49,420 --> 00:11:51,040 And we are seeking to make them do it. 116 00:11:51,370 --> 00:12:01,180 And once they've done it, the Prime Minister made clear at the Indian, uh, G20 that we would be happy to, uh, be part of a capital increase. 117 00:12:01,420 --> 00:12:05,380 We want to see hybrid capital deploy. We want to see more guarantees used. 118 00:12:05,800 --> 00:12:09,520 Um, and we want to see disaster risk finance, uh, used. 119 00:12:09,850 --> 00:12:13,479 All of these things will help the MDB scale up. 120 00:12:13,480 --> 00:12:22,430 And, uh, if you look at, uh, before to move on to the DFI, VII of course, investing, uh, risk capital, no loan involved. 121 00:12:22,450 --> 00:12:28,210 Our risk capital last year, £750 million in, uh, Africa. 122 00:12:28,390 --> 00:12:34,030 We want them to do more in the least, uh, the least developed states. 123 00:12:34,390 --> 00:12:42,970 Um, so they are charts in the white paper to go up from 37% to 50% investment in the least well-off countries. 124 00:12:43,240 --> 00:12:49,990 Um, and the Foreign Office is deploying, uh, through, um, a whole range of different mechanisms. 125 00:12:49,990 --> 00:12:58,389 My favourite is FSD Africa, which is helping to build, uh, core capital market infrastructure in Africa. 126 00:12:58,390 --> 00:13:06,190 There's Excel, there's, uh, mobile assets, which is producing a listed, uh, pipeline, which Stefan will remember, uh, very well. 127 00:13:06,190 --> 00:13:15,250 We're trying to find ways of lowering the cost of the exchange risk, deepening local capital markets and mobilising domestic savings. 128 00:13:15,700 --> 00:13:21,549 Um, and if you look at the flow of remittances across Africa, which dwarfs the flow of, uh, 129 00:13:21,550 --> 00:13:27,790 of aid and also, uh, direct financial investment, you can, I hope, uh, see what I mean? 130 00:13:27,790 --> 00:13:36,729 So that is I think my contribution, my only contribution is about my time is about up, I think now, um, uh, but just let me add a couple of things. 131 00:13:36,730 --> 00:13:46,299 We are very clear in the white paper about the need to, uh, address debt issues in the aftermath of, uh, 132 00:13:46,300 --> 00:13:54,040 Gleneagles and, um, hepatic, uh, we don't want, um, we don't want to add moral jeopardy and all of that. 133 00:13:54,160 --> 00:14:01,059 So we're very keen to make sure that the G20 mechanisms and other mechanisms are enhanced to address debt issues. 134 00:14:01,060 --> 00:14:09,790 Britain has, uh, pioneered and marketed, uh, these, uh, special debt clauses, um, uh, debt resilient, 135 00:14:09,820 --> 00:14:14,440 uh, resilient to climate resilient debt clauses, which we launched in Paris last year, 136 00:14:14,440 --> 00:14:19,360 which give people a two year break when there's one of these awful events in terms of repaying, 137 00:14:19,780 --> 00:14:24,550 uh, capital and interest, they need to use their liquidity for their own, uh, people. 138 00:14:24,850 --> 00:14:30,759 And we need also to attack, uh, the flows of illicit finance, which, uh, alas, 139 00:14:30,760 --> 00:14:39,790 London and the overseas territories and Crown dependencies are all too often complicit in and to champion the Lusaka agenda, 140 00:14:40,180 --> 00:14:48,370 um, and the agenda on, uh, localism, which my colleague Samantha Powers and USAID has said, uh, so many wise things about. 141 00:14:48,370 --> 00:14:58,509 We understand that for development to work really well partnership, uh, localism, the Lusaka Accord principles are vital to get effect. 142 00:14:58,510 --> 00:15:09,390 Thank you very much indeed. Thank you for your opening remarks, Minister. 143 00:15:09,480 --> 00:15:13,730 Uh, Emily, thank you very much. And it's lovely to be with you all today. 144 00:15:14,150 --> 00:15:19,160 Um, my background's very much in trade, in economics, so I'm going to speak to that. But I'm also going to speak mainly about the ways of working. 145 00:15:19,850 --> 00:15:22,880 Um, and I wanted to focus on, uh, 146 00:15:23,030 --> 00:15:28,669 the phrase that you use in the white paper of patron and mutually respectful partnerships, which is absolutely vital. 147 00:15:28,670 --> 00:15:32,840 And I really fully underscore that. Um, and actually, I started my first job. 148 00:15:32,930 --> 00:15:37,340 Um, was actually in it in the early 2000, working on partnerships in Brazil. 149 00:15:37,700 --> 00:15:42,500 Um, with the whole notion that actually partnerships and genuine partnership needed to underpin development. 150 00:15:42,830 --> 00:15:44,360 Um, and it's, it's it's hard. 151 00:15:44,360 --> 00:15:50,540 It's hard when you're in a donor recipient relationship to actually have relationships create those partnerships that are genuinely, 152 00:15:50,540 --> 00:15:55,309 long term, uh, genuinely respectful. Um, so I had a few few comments. 153 00:15:55,310 --> 00:15:58,820 I wanted to actually take us into some terrain I think is not always the most comfortable, 154 00:15:58,820 --> 00:16:02,660 but actually is where we need to think about working collaboratively together. 155 00:16:02,660 --> 00:16:05,660 And here I really commend your cross-party, um, 156 00:16:05,660 --> 00:16:11,300 initiatives to really think about how do we situate the UK 20 years out so that actually these long term, 157 00:16:11,420 --> 00:16:15,110 mutually respectful partnerships are absolutely, um, the foundation. 158 00:16:15,440 --> 00:16:23,980 And I think, paradoxically, here, what we see globally is a huge shift in global economic power, in the global order, in much more contested terrain. 159 00:16:24,050 --> 00:16:27,470 We see the rise of China. New development partners have come up. 160 00:16:27,890 --> 00:16:31,799 Um, so, you know, if you're a developing country, you're looking out for development partners. 161 00:16:31,800 --> 00:16:39,500 There's a there's a there's a will, um, choice to, um, a much more choice, which means that then for us, we do need to have a really good offer. 162 00:16:39,500 --> 00:16:44,629 We need to be there to make sure that we are, um, you know, go to a go to partner, um, which actually creates, 163 00:16:44,630 --> 00:16:51,380 I think, some nimble ness and creativity and some opportunity, um, for us, what might that look like? 164 00:16:51,410 --> 00:16:51,860 Um, 165 00:16:52,370 --> 00:16:59,389 I think there's a few things I think on the and here I want to just think about where are there opportunities for mutual interest and actually really, 166 00:16:59,390 --> 00:17:06,500 genuinely working in a collaborative way with developing country governments because the UK and those governments have got a shared interest. 167 00:17:06,950 --> 00:17:15,739 And here I think at this particular juncture in the global system, when multilateralism is really under threat, really building that system, 168 00:17:15,740 --> 00:17:24,649 and I think to some extent we're re envisaging that system for a multipolar world with a lot of disparate tensions, um, is a really important one. 169 00:17:24,650 --> 00:17:32,330 So I commend very much leaning into that multilateralism and helping to bring and make sure that the larger players in the global economy are also, 170 00:17:32,780 --> 00:17:38,769 um, you know, doing that their part. So I think absolutely leading in the, um, perhaps the, the, 171 00:17:38,770 --> 00:17:44,290 the bit that's been a bit of a pinch point for us in the UK is making sure that then we're upholding that commitment, 172 00:17:44,310 --> 00:17:47,680 international law and sort of principled base approach right across the piece. 173 00:17:47,690 --> 00:17:54,710 And I think here, um, we can perhaps open up the discussion, but it's it's making sure that that cuts right across in all that we do, 174 00:17:55,250 --> 00:17:58,190 whether that sort of respect for international law, human rights, etc. 175 00:17:58,190 --> 00:18:05,240 So again, making sure we're making the case, I think domestically for that values based, principle based international engagement. 176 00:18:05,960 --> 00:18:11,750 Um, which is the second thing I wanted to mention, um, within this, I was thinking about those pinch points. 177 00:18:11,750 --> 00:18:18,860 So I know any partnership, it's making sure that both partners are prepared to adjust, um, where there are frictions and tensions. 178 00:18:19,340 --> 00:18:23,090 Um, and here I think we've done it. We've done a huge amount. 179 00:18:23,420 --> 00:18:28,399 Um, historically, I think some of the points you made just been about illicit financial flows and 180 00:18:28,400 --> 00:18:32,389 acknowledging London's role there and actually being prepared to then act. 181 00:18:32,390 --> 00:18:36,770 I really commend you on raising that right across the board, because again, 182 00:18:36,770 --> 00:18:40,339 it's thinking about what can we do at home that actually is not always easy, 183 00:18:40,340 --> 00:18:44,510 but really, again, shows that we're prepared to be in a genuine partnership, um, 184 00:18:44,510 --> 00:18:51,260 in the trade space, I think again, which is the portfolio I follow most closely at the moment, there's quite a disconnect between, 185 00:18:51,470 --> 00:18:56,870 uh, our trade portfolio, which tends to be a little bit more thinking about short term opportunities. 186 00:18:57,050 --> 00:19:02,410 And actually some of the very important conversations that are happening in Fcdo about diversifying that, 187 00:19:02,420 --> 00:19:06,010 that trading relationship that we've got and building it for the long term. 188 00:19:06,020 --> 00:19:11,899 So again, joining up and I think the trade offer and the development offer um becomes quite important. 189 00:19:11,900 --> 00:19:15,830 So making sure we're making the case across the piece for um development. 190 00:19:16,430 --> 00:19:18,740 Um, the third point I want to make is around the respect. 191 00:19:19,160 --> 00:19:23,840 Um, and here I think it's really interesting question about how do we build respectful partnerships. 192 00:19:24,200 --> 00:19:33,589 Um, the huge value that we have in the UK of having a large number of people from developing country, the diaspora here living and working in the UK. 193 00:19:33,590 --> 00:19:39,770 And as you've said, it's they're the ones sending all the remittance flows that actually massively then outnumber and outweigh our, 194 00:19:39,950 --> 00:19:42,919 um, Oda spend or our foreign direct investment. 195 00:19:42,920 --> 00:19:51,620 So they are the de facto ambassadors of the UK, if you like, that the channel and the mechanism through which that support flows. 196 00:19:52,010 --> 00:19:59,690 Um, so what can we and we've got a huge amount of expertise in long term relationships, not least in this room as well. 197 00:19:59,900 --> 00:20:05,790 So how do we capitalise on that? Not not only within government to making sure those people are really in, um, Fcdo but. 198 00:20:06,090 --> 00:20:08,510 Celebrating those those day today and again here. 199 00:20:08,510 --> 00:20:17,839 I think making the case for the contribution of migrant workers and remittances, um, within the UK, um, domestically as well. 200 00:20:17,840 --> 00:20:21,079 I think it's not again, in the easy moment to do that, 201 00:20:21,080 --> 00:20:27,590 but I think we're making that case and showing that respect again, super important again, that cross-party, um, area. 202 00:20:28,010 --> 00:20:29,959 And finally was just the patient the long time. 203 00:20:29,960 --> 00:20:34,220 And here I really wanted to commend the cross-party nature of the White Paper and all the work that you've done. 204 00:20:34,640 --> 00:20:39,590 Um, because I think the the risk is the sort of short term politics driving the day 205 00:20:39,590 --> 00:20:43,040 and undercutting some of that long term planning and that long term focus. 206 00:20:43,040 --> 00:20:51,109 The more that we can embed a longer term planning within Parliament and across parties and sort of embed that, 207 00:20:51,110 --> 00:20:55,219 I think we're then able to look to the long term and have those relationships 208 00:20:55,220 --> 00:20:59,180 that span and the projects that span to 20 years and aren't sort of hijacked, 209 00:21:00,350 --> 00:21:03,620 um, vulnerable, if you like, to the political moment. 210 00:21:03,980 --> 00:21:11,910 Um, and changes that, that brings. Thank you. Emily. Minister, would you like to address some of those points or would you want to? 211 00:21:11,930 --> 00:21:15,920 I think we should have Stefan first. Okay. He's an expert on this stuff. 212 00:21:16,910 --> 00:21:21,830 Are you sure? Yeah. Yeah, yeah. Okay. Well, okay. Well. Thank you. 213 00:21:22,760 --> 00:21:34,370 First and foremost, um, I, um, having left and CEO, uh, before the minister came back, um, I very much welcome, 214 00:21:34,370 --> 00:21:40,459 you know, all the work that's been put in and the idea of trying to bring a vision around development back together, 215 00:21:40,460 --> 00:21:45,320 you know, it's maybe very appropriate that it's Richard Curtis who writes the summary because, 216 00:21:45,920 --> 00:21:49,730 you know, maybe when it comes to development in the UK, it is love Actually, after all. 217 00:21:50,030 --> 00:21:53,780 Um, and an attempt to actually do a bit of that, um, 218 00:21:53,780 --> 00:22:00,109 because it was difficult times and a real concern that people that were working in the development sector, 219 00:22:00,110 --> 00:22:05,749 but not least inside your organisation, working through the merger, the cuts, I mean, these were difficult times. 220 00:22:05,750 --> 00:22:11,030 So, so and I do know and I will want to compliment the minister definitely for it is that, 221 00:22:11,420 --> 00:22:15,310 you know, it is a change of mood inside the organisation relative to us. 222 00:22:15,320 --> 00:22:22,100 It was before that actually there is a sense of, okay, there is a there's a role for the UK in development and to play, 223 00:22:22,100 --> 00:22:27,589 you know, and there's lots of other things still there. And of course budgets are, are tied, but there is at least somehow. 224 00:22:27,590 --> 00:22:33,800 And I definitely know from my former colleagues that there is a bit of a motivation, again, of trying to actually build this. 225 00:22:34,460 --> 00:22:35,420 There are challenges. 226 00:22:35,420 --> 00:22:45,290 And so let me put, put a couple of things about, well, where I think the proof will be in the pudding about the, the, the white paper. 227 00:22:45,290 --> 00:22:50,540 And a lot to do with how it will be implemented rather than what the ambition is. 228 00:22:50,780 --> 00:22:57,379 Okay. And so and of course, it's going to be over time and it's going to take time to put it on and, and just to, just to make sure. 229 00:22:57,380 --> 00:23:02,990 And I and my comments are very much to be seen in the context of the, the time, for example, 230 00:23:02,990 --> 00:23:07,190 that I worked in different and afterwards in nphcda over definitely the different time. 231 00:23:07,190 --> 00:23:14,510 And I will go back say maybe even to to 2000. So even in the 1990s, there were rather benign times for development. 232 00:23:14,570 --> 00:23:17,750 Okay. So there was a relatively simple world order. 233 00:23:18,380 --> 00:23:26,060 There is not a big multiple parity. There is clearly, uh, a beginnings of progress in the world, but also, you know, 234 00:23:26,060 --> 00:23:30,680 things like MDGs and then as the GS, a kind of a commitment to do things. 235 00:23:31,190 --> 00:23:38,830 Um, and actually, we should just recognise it that a lot of the time, the last few decades have seen this quite dramatic progress in, 236 00:23:39,050 --> 00:23:46,370 in, in, in extreme poverty and the reductions of deprivation of its health deprivations or extreme poverty since 1990. 237 00:23:46,370 --> 00:23:50,359 It's two thirds time down and it's combined with actually, 238 00:23:50,360 --> 00:23:57,370 for the first time in history since the I think it's the 17th century where developing countries are beginning to in their economies back, 239 00:23:57,380 --> 00:24:04,730 converging to living standards very still, slowly, but on average, converging back, growing faster than Western economies. 240 00:24:05,060 --> 00:24:07,490 So call it a benign period. And a lot was achieved. 241 00:24:08,180 --> 00:24:13,579 So we now getting here now and I would say, you know, some people say 2015 now this would say 2020, 242 00:24:13,580 --> 00:24:19,090 but definitely in that latter part of the 20 tens, a change in the world structures. 243 00:24:19,100 --> 00:24:26,390 Okay, first of all, you know, um, we have multiple priority emerging different forces playing. 244 00:24:26,630 --> 00:24:31,820 And of course the battlegrounds are these typically or geopolitical forces this in the developing world. 245 00:24:31,820 --> 00:24:33,530 And it's definitely in lots of poor places. 246 00:24:34,040 --> 00:24:42,169 Uh, we can scramble for natural resources again, and not just from one party that used to be called by the last minister. 247 00:24:42,170 --> 00:24:44,420 I had to serve malign forces. 248 00:24:44,750 --> 00:24:55,790 But, um, uh, but there is an element of, you know, there is something there going on and, and but arguably we need terrorist materials as well. 249 00:24:55,790 --> 00:25:04,460 We need the materials for climate change. We need to pay attention to, to natural resources in a way that maybe in different ways, we didn't have. 250 00:25:05,030 --> 00:25:08,319 Um, so there's a. Altered polarity there is. That's part of it. 251 00:25:08,320 --> 00:25:15,760 And of course, there's the climate crisis that actually in a lot of the progress in development somehow or another, that was not a big part. 252 00:25:15,790 --> 00:25:23,020 And I would say these two things, and I want to just for a moment on on make three points down substantively in terms of, 253 00:25:23,320 --> 00:25:27,320 you know, where will the proof be in the pudding, so to speak, for the for the things. 254 00:25:27,320 --> 00:25:30,580 There's many more areas that I'm sure some of you will want to talk about. 255 00:25:30,580 --> 00:25:34,450 So the first of all this, let's speak for a moment up on the climate crisis. 256 00:25:34,460 --> 00:25:38,680 Okay. So clearly, you know, we know the developing world hasn't caused it, 257 00:25:38,680 --> 00:25:46,630 but we need to therefore be part of the movement that tries to help them for the transition and make it make it very just. 258 00:25:47,290 --> 00:25:54,400 But of course, one of the problems is I'm sorry, and I should have added the need for finance that the ministry is alluding to in a big way. 259 00:25:54,760 --> 00:25:58,149 Uh, of course, comes also on the back of this, you know, 260 00:25:58,150 --> 00:26:04,750 the massive finance that will be needed for the transition and to putting countries on a path that is sustainable. 261 00:26:05,620 --> 00:26:13,089 Now, it has one problem, and the problem is as follows that if you think of the urgency of where we need to work on, 262 00:26:13,090 --> 00:26:21,490 this is in the fastest growing economies, because if basically, as Nick stern tends to say, uh, you know, it's in Asia, 263 00:26:21,910 --> 00:26:25,569 that the future of the planet will be determined, they're growing very fast. 264 00:26:25,570 --> 00:26:31,330 And if we don't get the right infrastructure with its energy infrastructure or other infrastructure, they're in place. 265 00:26:31,570 --> 00:26:36,880 And it's fun. Find a way of partnering with them on doing this. And indeed, finance will play a big role in it. 266 00:26:37,150 --> 00:26:38,230 It needs to happen that. 267 00:26:39,110 --> 00:26:46,190 Of course, I'm somewhat and I will fully admit to it, that comes entirely out of work around poverty and as a poverty economist. 268 00:26:46,730 --> 00:26:48,830 The concentration of extreme poverty in Africa. 269 00:26:49,130 --> 00:26:57,800 And so the geographical challenge of where the focus has to be is very different now because the multiple objective we have, which is, you know, 270 00:26:57,800 --> 00:27:04,250 partnering with Asia so that at least we can use and find the way that they go fast enough in the transition 271 00:27:04,520 --> 00:27:09,310 relative to where the extreme poverty is and where I need to work is definitely going to be there. 272 00:27:09,590 --> 00:27:13,360 And so we need to have an answer of how are we going to handle this? 273 00:27:13,370 --> 00:27:19,730 And I don't believe, as some people have said, I think that Mr. Banga has set it as the world Bank. 274 00:27:20,060 --> 00:27:23,560 You know, there are no trade offs between poverty and climate. 275 00:27:23,570 --> 00:27:29,000 No, this is the one that I describe. The concentration of poverty is not in the first place, 276 00:27:29,000 --> 00:27:34,100 is where we need to make sure that the climate, where the climate is not going to destroy the planet. 277 00:27:35,030 --> 00:27:39,260 Of course we can do adaptation, but then we may have to move resources away from mitigation. 278 00:27:39,530 --> 00:27:42,709 And so they are trade offs. You know, I'm an economist. They're all trade offs. 279 00:27:42,710 --> 00:27:45,260 We can't deny it. And we'll need to think through it. 280 00:27:45,260 --> 00:27:51,890 And I just wonder and it's I think the white paper needs to find a way and its implementation in that sense. 281 00:27:52,310 --> 00:27:59,900 The second thing is very quickly is that what does it look like, a white paper like this from a poor developing country? 282 00:28:00,380 --> 00:28:04,610 Okay. I typically have, say maybe African countries in mind, but it could be Bangladesh. 283 00:28:04,610 --> 00:28:07,970 It could be Nepal as well. What does it look like when you see this? 284 00:28:08,000 --> 00:28:12,830 Okay. And now the main thing is that it looks quite all right. 285 00:28:13,070 --> 00:28:18,980 But if I'm sitting in Lusaka or in Accra or in Addis Ababa, 286 00:28:19,820 --> 00:28:27,230 I actually it's a different situation that many of the ideas that were involved and emerged it than it was 15, 20 years ago. 287 00:28:27,260 --> 00:28:31,730 I have a choice. I don't have to look at you. I can look somewhere else. 288 00:28:32,030 --> 00:28:40,850 So the whole idea of of of something that want to be, you know, an element of value driven, of normative aspects of how you do development. 289 00:28:41,240 --> 00:28:42,950 You're facing a world where there is choice. 290 00:28:43,460 --> 00:28:49,070 And to be honest, if I was a minister in a government in Accra or not, this job, I would welcome the choice I have. 291 00:28:49,400 --> 00:28:51,200 I would welcome that. I have a choice. 292 00:28:51,530 --> 00:29:00,500 And so this is actually in a bit like, okay, how do we make the offer we have beyond finance really attractive enough in terms of what we can offer. 293 00:29:01,130 --> 00:29:04,910 And that does mean something different from what I experienced. 294 00:29:05,210 --> 00:29:13,640 Also working inside the system, where maybe it is the interest of the country maybe has to have a bigger weights and the kinds 295 00:29:13,640 --> 00:29:18,290 of mutual benefits you need to be willing to offer enough that actually it's really beneficial. 296 00:29:18,590 --> 00:29:24,790 And that actually this idea and which I worry about. I was recently in Brussels, for example, language around the global gateway. 297 00:29:24,800 --> 00:29:31,760 I'm not saying the white paper does this, but around the global gateway, it's all about driven by national politics. 298 00:29:31,760 --> 00:29:38,630 In the end, in Europe as well, we are going to do partnerships, but clearly because it's in the interest of, of of firms in Europe and so on. 299 00:29:38,690 --> 00:29:41,870 Now it's possible, but you have to work it through very carefully. 300 00:29:42,020 --> 00:29:46,430 And the balance between I might go into the short term, promoting your own national interest, 301 00:29:46,760 --> 00:29:51,260 whether it's from security or prosperity point of view or from votes in the Security Council, 302 00:29:51,260 --> 00:29:56,270 or am I generally going to offer something is a hard job and you need to work through. 303 00:29:56,270 --> 00:29:59,810 And I have the final point. I'm for the moderates. I'm looking at me. Very stunning. 304 00:30:00,200 --> 00:30:06,080 Um, is is the final thing. Remember where the concentration of poor people is? 305 00:30:07,150 --> 00:30:11,100 Who are the partners there? Okay. Fragile states. 306 00:30:11,110 --> 00:30:15,130 Yes. That's a very euphemistic state. I would say there's a lot of extreme poverty. 307 00:30:15,340 --> 00:30:20,020 Typically in countries where those in power don't really care about poverty. 308 00:30:20,990 --> 00:30:24,770 Where we have elites that actually have very different objectives and largely staying in power. 309 00:30:24,980 --> 00:30:30,050 Look at many West African countries. I don't think it's just in itself benign. 310 00:30:30,770 --> 00:30:38,300 Now, who are the partners and how you do it? If you need to go and partner for natural resources, if you need to go and partner for geopolitics, 311 00:30:38,690 --> 00:30:42,500 or are going to need to partner because of poverty and the and it may contradict. 312 00:30:42,950 --> 00:30:48,320 And I do think there's work to be done by the department to really think in this context. 313 00:30:48,560 --> 00:30:55,010 How do you work in these fragile places where actually maybe the objectives of those in power is not necessarily aligned to it? 314 00:30:55,040 --> 00:30:58,729 How do you partner? How do you work? Are you working around it? 315 00:30:58,730 --> 00:31:06,200 But no, you need partners. You need to have ownership there as well. And how can you encourage the generally the group that actually, you know, 316 00:31:06,200 --> 00:31:11,930 you can support those who want to actually positive change in their places without patronising, without imposing. 317 00:31:12,170 --> 00:31:17,210 And how do you actually do partnership in this kind of maybe not so benign places? 318 00:31:17,840 --> 00:31:24,469 Thank you. Um, and I've counted at least seven very interesting questions that both of you asked the minister. 319 00:31:24,470 --> 00:31:30,650 So you may not be able to address all of them in one go, but I'm sure they'll recur with with this audience as well. 320 00:31:31,220 --> 00:31:35,090 When we open up the conversation. So history but. 321 00:31:35,110 --> 00:31:42,020 Well let me. Can you hear? Can you hear me? All right. Uh, let me have a crack at some of at least some of those those points. 322 00:31:42,470 --> 00:31:48,200 I mean, you know, the the, uh, uh, I commented on the merger. 323 00:31:48,350 --> 00:31:52,100 Uh, of course, I'm now a poacher turned gamekeeper. 324 00:31:52,580 --> 00:32:00,020 Uh, many of the things I said about the merger when it took place are not repeatable in a family audience, but the the the, um, uh, my job. 325 00:32:00,020 --> 00:32:02,929 The Prime Minister said to me, can you see if you can make things work? 326 00:32:02,930 --> 00:32:13,969 And what what we've been trying to do is to have a, uh, within the Foreign Office, an entity which can deliver global public goods into the 2030. 327 00:32:13,970 --> 00:32:22,040 That's a sort of, ehm, to see if you can build something which which has the strengths of deferred and also gains in the Foreign Office. 328 00:32:22,040 --> 00:32:28,849 And of course, I remember very well it differed. There were issues we wanted to do, and I had to go and see the Foreign Secretary and say, 329 00:32:28,850 --> 00:32:34,040 you know, will you allow your brilliant network all around the world to champion this? 330 00:32:34,430 --> 00:32:44,030 And one of the things that the Foreign Office really has internalised, very impressive, is the importance of girls and women in development policy. 331 00:32:44,040 --> 00:32:50,350 I've always argued that you cannot understand international development unless you see it through the eyes of girls and women. 332 00:32:50,360 --> 00:32:55,610 Everyone here will know what I what I mean by the Foreign Office really have internalised that point. 333 00:32:55,610 --> 00:32:59,299 But equally, you know, when I got back there, I discovered, uh, 334 00:32:59,300 --> 00:33:03,170 two things in particular, one of which was I may have said this when I was here before, 335 00:33:03,170 --> 00:33:09,799 but it was like meeting people who had coming out from the rubble of a nuclear explosion and who was very, 336 00:33:09,800 --> 00:33:17,990 very disenchanted indeed, and who, you know, remembered that it had been able to make the weather, you know, when David, 337 00:33:18,320 --> 00:33:26,390 it was had such good connections all around the world we could really do things and that the merger had damaged that very, very gravely. 338 00:33:26,690 --> 00:33:32,140 Um, and of course, there's no such thing as a merger. One side always wins and one side always loses. 339 00:33:32,150 --> 00:33:35,600 I learnt that many years ago as a young banker in the city. 340 00:33:35,930 --> 00:33:40,280 So. So, you know, there are real issues that I tried to address. 341 00:33:40,280 --> 00:33:47,510 A lot of them in the Chatham House speech I made, uh, in April last year, where I sort of tried to deal with the structural stuff. 342 00:33:47,840 --> 00:33:52,399 And the white paper seeks to deal with the policy side and of course, 343 00:33:52,400 --> 00:33:58,910 the white the process of the white paper was very beneficial because the development of people who I mean, 344 00:33:58,910 --> 00:34:03,500 some of the key there were 13 people who wrote the white paper with me. 345 00:34:03,830 --> 00:34:08,720 And a lot of us, you know, we worked for 7 or 8 weekends on the trot to try and get it right. 346 00:34:08,990 --> 00:34:13,610 So it lifted the spirits of the development, uh, silo within the Foreign Office. 347 00:34:13,880 --> 00:34:18,770 But it also intellectually engaged these Foreign Office officials and officials across 348 00:34:18,770 --> 00:34:23,780 Whitehall who saw what the development people could do and engaged with it intellectually. 349 00:34:23,780 --> 00:34:27,349 So that itself was a very good, uh, process. 350 00:34:27,350 --> 00:34:35,989 But we've seen a very stark diminution in capacity, uh, within development, wherever you look, whether that was a humanitarian, 351 00:34:35,990 --> 00:34:42,890 where there were enormous number of vacancies, I mean, about half a team of 80 were down to below 40 in that. 352 00:34:43,340 --> 00:34:48,290 And then, you know, the results which we championed so strongly in the earlier phase of this government, 353 00:34:48,590 --> 00:34:51,919 you know, there was no one at all doing results for no one at all. 354 00:34:51,920 --> 00:34:59,190 So the key thing you have to show the British people, if you want them to support a big development program, is that they're getting value for money. 355 00:34:59,190 --> 00:35:02,960 If you haven't got people doing results, you simply can't do that. 356 00:35:03,590 --> 00:35:10,550 Then the whole thing is compounded by the point that you made, uh, which was that for the first time in my lifetime, 357 00:35:10,760 --> 00:35:14,960 the international system is short the rules based system because the Russians, 358 00:35:15,170 --> 00:35:20,480 a member of one of the P5 at the UN, invaded, uh, its neighbour, um, bombed and. 359 00:35:20,570 --> 00:35:28,460 Destroyed its infrastructure. Slaughtered its citizens. This is a P5 member doing something which we thought we could assign to the history books. 360 00:35:28,910 --> 00:35:37,040 It is the era of narrow nationalism now, and it's the era where you badly need all the sinews of the international system, 361 00:35:37,040 --> 00:35:43,580 whether you're dealing with pandemics or protectionism or terrorism or climate change. 362 00:35:44,060 --> 00:35:52,700 Um, as another one, I've missed out. Uh, but but, you know, these are things which really need to have the international system pulling together. 363 00:35:53,030 --> 00:35:59,749 And, you know, whether you look at Trump or Modi or Ji or Putin or Boris Johnson or whatever you've got, 364 00:35:59,750 --> 00:36:02,870 you've got you've got the era of narrow nationalism. 365 00:36:03,080 --> 00:36:07,159 This is the very thing that the our forefathers after the war, 366 00:36:07,160 --> 00:36:12,880 who'd seen the slaughter on the Western Front in the First World War and the carnage of the Second World War. 367 00:36:12,890 --> 00:36:18,260 They wanted an international system, Bretton Woods and all these other things to bind people in. 368 00:36:18,260 --> 00:36:25,440 And and so that that was the next point I wanted to make. I thought you made a very interesting point indeed about, um, development and trade. 369 00:36:25,460 --> 00:36:32,210 Of course, they go absolutely hand in hand this, uh, developing countries trading scheme, which is the best in the world now. 370 00:36:32,420 --> 00:36:37,490 It's better than anything but arms or a, um, very, very strong, better than the EPAs. 371 00:36:37,700 --> 00:36:44,479 Is Britain saying to poor countries, we want to make it easy for you to sell what you can to our country, 372 00:36:44,480 --> 00:36:47,720 and we want you to have the value added in your country. 373 00:36:47,930 --> 00:36:56,120 And we're prepared to, uh, forget about, uh, rules of origin, which in other areas have been very, uh, damaging. 374 00:36:56,210 --> 00:37:00,680 And, um, it's fermented mentioned the importance of the poverty focus. 375 00:37:01,100 --> 00:37:07,430 I thought the big battle in the Foreign Office would be getting poverty into the title of the White Paper. 376 00:37:07,500 --> 00:37:11,809 Very anyone who's operating in the developed world knows that unless you 377 00:37:11,810 --> 00:37:16,580 understand that that is the purpose of British international development policy, 378 00:37:16,580 --> 00:37:22,430 you're completely missing the point. And actually, it's quite easy. There weren't that many people who resist the word, people who resisted it. 379 00:37:22,490 --> 00:37:25,460 And, uh, but there weren't that, uh, that many. 380 00:37:25,880 --> 00:37:32,060 Um, and also, you made the point about not being too pessimistic because we have decreased the levels of, 381 00:37:32,390 --> 00:37:35,959 of, uh, egregious poverty as defined by two thirds. 382 00:37:35,960 --> 00:37:44,600 I thought that was a very good point. Um, on the, um, climate crisis and the anger in the developing world. 383 00:37:45,080 --> 00:37:52,490 Um, and the concern, um, for example, about loss and damage in the, in the developed world. 384 00:37:52,820 --> 00:37:58,490 Um, I would say we put £60 million into loss damage. 385 00:37:59,000 --> 00:38:03,650 Um, we did it because the, uh, you looking at me in a second, a while. 386 00:38:04,520 --> 00:38:05,780 We did it, we did it, we did it. 387 00:38:05,780 --> 00:38:14,510 Uh, I don't over overuse, but, um, we did it because, um, the UAE put in $100 million, um, alongside Germany, I think. 388 00:38:14,990 --> 00:38:18,170 Um, uh, but our point about loss and damage. 389 00:38:18,530 --> 00:38:21,259 I don't particularly like the finger pointing nature of the title, 390 00:38:21,260 --> 00:38:28,310 but that's a that's a minor point is that it has to, uh, bring in non-traditional donors. 391 00:38:28,640 --> 00:38:32,260 You can't just rely upon the classic OECD DAC. 392 00:38:32,330 --> 00:38:36,410 You've got to have the Saudis in that other countries, in the UAE, the Gulf, 393 00:38:36,710 --> 00:38:40,400 you've got to have Russia, China, you've got to have these other countries in there. 394 00:38:40,850 --> 00:38:45,290 If it's to work, um, and you've got to find different sources of finance. 395 00:38:45,290 --> 00:38:53,839 Otherwise it's just Peter robbing Paul. Uh, we put in Oda money, but you've got to find other mechanisms for funding and other people to fund. 396 00:38:53,840 --> 00:38:58,910 So, you know, maybe it's some sort of maritime fuel levy or something like that. 397 00:38:59,270 --> 00:39:04,700 But but that is, that is obviously very much work in, uh, progress. 398 00:39:04,700 --> 00:39:08,719 And finally, how do you work in difficult places? I mean, there's a matrix, isn't there? 399 00:39:08,720 --> 00:39:14,660 Ideally, you want to do as much as possible with the government, but you can't countenance corruption. 400 00:39:14,660 --> 00:39:19,910 You must have a zero tolerance of of corruption because it's a cancer of development, poisons everything. 401 00:39:20,210 --> 00:39:23,240 So so ideally you do as much as possible with a government. 402 00:39:23,240 --> 00:39:27,890 If you can't, you do it with local NGOs. If you can't do that, you do with international NGOs. 403 00:39:28,310 --> 00:39:36,709 Um, and uh, remembering always that we work with people and countries, leaderships like Britain, British Foreign Office recognition. 404 00:39:36,710 --> 00:39:41,160 We don't recognise leaders because otherwise we get into a mess when there are coups. 405 00:39:41,160 --> 00:39:47,300 That's when we recognise countries and, uh, is an important part of development that we, 406 00:39:47,480 --> 00:39:53,630 that we work, uh, on issues which affect the poor people in those countries, of the people whose, 407 00:39:53,930 --> 00:40:01,850 whose standard of living and whose, um, appreciation of the importance of economic development and prosperity, 408 00:40:01,850 --> 00:40:09,440 whose fear of conflict, we are on their side in tapping and driving forward the answers to those things. 409 00:40:10,230 --> 00:40:15,389 Thank you. Minister. Um, we have about 35 minutes left to our event. 410 00:40:15,390 --> 00:40:22,500 And because of, um, very interesting, um, audience we have here with lots of accumulated experience, 411 00:40:22,500 --> 00:40:28,890 I will somewhat abbreviate our our conversation here, but I have just two very brief questions for you. 412 00:40:29,250 --> 00:40:32,610 One of them is, uh, concerns domestic politics. 413 00:40:32,610 --> 00:40:40,530 And I thank you for being so candid about, um, you know, differed and relationship with the Foreign Office in the recent years. 414 00:40:40,890 --> 00:40:46,710 Uh, we much appreciated. Uh, the point is, something seems to have changed in the last two years. 415 00:40:47,100 --> 00:40:51,750 Um, you brought a lot of, uh, you brought a strong tradition of bipartisanship. 416 00:40:52,140 --> 00:40:59,490 Um, Charles already mentioned your, uh, remarkable work with Margaret Hodge, uh, on illicit finance over the years. 417 00:40:59,820 --> 00:41:03,660 Um, and this seems to have affected the way the conversation about the white paper wind. 418 00:41:03,900 --> 00:41:06,780 You consulted very extensively. You involved? 419 00:41:07,110 --> 00:41:16,820 Um, not just Margaret, but people like, uh, David Davis, Liam Byrne, a lot of individuals across the bench who are who were part of the conversation. 420 00:41:16,830 --> 00:41:26,190 Can you tell us a little bit about how that went, that process of, uh, de politicising the development conversation and your hopes for the future? 421 00:41:26,200 --> 00:41:32,069 Do you think that this this is the new normal and we're not going to go back to the way development was, 422 00:41:32,070 --> 00:41:36,420 was politicised, that became so polarising over last 7 or 8 years in the UK. 423 00:41:37,350 --> 00:41:48,510 So. So um, yes, I can I mean, the, the what I always used to say when we were in opposition before 2010 excuse to antagonise, 424 00:41:48,540 --> 00:41:56,609 uh, my then opposition, my good friend Douglas Alexander was I to says is the Labour policy or Tory policy. 425 00:41:56,610 --> 00:41:59,950 It's a British policy and I believe that, if you will. 426 00:41:59,970 --> 00:42:09,690 And we were working very well until Boris came along to embed into Britain the sense that it wasn't charity. 427 00:42:10,080 --> 00:42:14,760 And people continue to say to me, Charity begins at home. To which I always say, but it doesn't stop there. 428 00:42:15,270 --> 00:42:18,300 Um, but it wasn't charity. It was about British interests. 429 00:42:18,390 --> 00:42:24,080 I would argue every penny that we spend on international development is in Britain's interests that we do, 430 00:42:24,120 --> 00:42:31,709 because these egregious, uh, uh, huge differences of wealth and opportunity disfigure our world. 431 00:42:31,710 --> 00:42:38,530 And, and they, they create very unhappy people who are often prey to the terrorist recruiter. 432 00:42:38,550 --> 00:42:46,650 So, so, you know, I would argue that and it's a British policy and we I, I don't I took out all the word leadership in the white paper. 433 00:42:46,650 --> 00:42:50,730 I think, um, along with the word tool, which appeared so often, I thought we should say that. 434 00:42:51,000 --> 00:42:58,230 But the, the, the point is that the more that it is a British approach, the more likely it is to be successful. 435 00:42:58,270 --> 00:43:00,989 And, uh, I hope very much that is the case. 436 00:43:00,990 --> 00:43:11,560 I mean, I talk often to, uh, David Lammy and Lisa Nandy, um, you know, and David very helpfully said that the view on the structure of David, 437 00:43:11,580 --> 00:43:16,800 Foreign Office, they were going to look and see how far I quote, how far Andrew got. 438 00:43:17,310 --> 00:43:23,160 So, you know, that's quite that's quite old to me in trying to negotiate change ahead of the Chatham House speech. 439 00:43:23,490 --> 00:43:29,670 Also, the whole thing is, to be blunt with you, the whole thing is much easier now that David Cameron is back as a foreign secretary, 440 00:43:29,670 --> 00:43:33,090 cause, I mean, I've worked with him and before him for the last 20 years. 441 00:43:33,090 --> 00:43:36,990 And, you know, and on any subject that comes before the Foreign Office, 442 00:43:37,230 --> 00:43:41,760 his views often surprise Foreign Office officials, and they mean they make for change. 443 00:43:42,210 --> 00:43:44,820 I know, and exactly what he's got to think about these days, 444 00:43:44,820 --> 00:43:49,830 because I've worked with him for so long and he's, uh, having him there, particularly as a foreign secretary. 445 00:43:49,830 --> 00:43:55,500 Being a prime minister gives the position of foreign secretary an enormous heft and power. 446 00:43:55,500 --> 00:44:02,850 And I know point about, um, Margaret Hodge and what what happened there is quite instructive because we were both on the backbenches. 447 00:44:02,850 --> 00:44:07,070 She was running the pack and she followed David Davis. 448 00:44:07,080 --> 00:44:09,930 And none of our politics are the same, of course. 449 00:44:10,170 --> 00:44:18,780 But, um, uh, you know, and so she was after dirty money because she was off people evading tax and businesses evading tax. 450 00:44:19,440 --> 00:44:23,700 I didn't come at it from that angle. I think the revenue has as much power as they need. 451 00:44:23,700 --> 00:44:33,480 Probably. But but, uh, I came at the point of view that I wanted to stop, uh, bent, uh, warlords, politicians and corrupt businessmen, 452 00:44:34,230 --> 00:44:42,810 ministers, um, in Africa from corrupt police stealing wealth, which belonged to those, uh, those countries. 453 00:44:43,350 --> 00:44:48,239 And, uh, I wanted to support things like the Extractive Industry Transparency Initiative, 454 00:44:48,240 --> 00:44:53,730 which and in our time, Britain joined to try and make sure that the stuff was more difficult. 455 00:44:53,740 --> 00:45:02,490 And of course, what Margaret and I joined up on that basis and we we once paid state visit stage to the three Crown dependencies. 456 00:45:02,490 --> 00:45:07,410 And I don't think till at this point today they recovered from Margaret Hodge's visit. 457 00:45:07,770 --> 00:45:15,020 As we as we as we you know, we. To tell them that their perception of themselves was not shared outside of those Crown dependencies. 458 00:45:15,020 --> 00:45:22,819 They needed to make change, and they needed open registers of beneficial ownership, which, in spite of clear commitments given to Margaret and me, 459 00:45:22,820 --> 00:45:29,120 and the threat of the threat of defeating the government as well on the issue, because we had the people to do so. 460 00:45:29,570 --> 00:45:35,390 Um, in spite of all of that, they still haven't fully signed up to any of this, and they've got to do so. 461 00:45:35,720 --> 00:45:40,280 Um, so, so I think it's an example of quite a good cross-party initiative. 462 00:45:40,310 --> 00:45:46,070 It didn't start from let's do something together, which I don't think is a good basis for all party initiatives. 463 00:45:46,340 --> 00:45:49,459 It starts from the basis. Well, I want to achieve this. You want to achieve that. 464 00:45:49,460 --> 00:45:56,780 So we join forces and that that's that's really, uh, how, um, how we tried to, uh, to do it. 465 00:45:57,050 --> 00:46:03,920 Thank you. And my final question before opening the floor, uh, you mentioned, uh, when we're talking about green transition and, 466 00:46:04,070 --> 00:46:10,160 uh, hybrid financing, I think it was in that context, you you mentioned and I quote, the Saudis should be in there. 467 00:46:10,700 --> 00:46:19,510 Um, and this opens up the question of values versus interests, because what you describe in the white paper is clearly an expansion, uh, 468 00:46:19,520 --> 00:46:25,190 not away from the traditional OECD states, but as you made the point just just a little while ago, 469 00:46:25,430 --> 00:46:28,610 that if it's just the usual suspects, it's no longer enough. Right? 470 00:46:29,580 --> 00:46:36,770 The other hand, there are there are serious issues on which all the UK is not like minded in regard to these states. 471 00:46:36,770 --> 00:46:40,429 And I'll just give you, uh, you don't necessarily have to comment on that in particular, 472 00:46:40,430 --> 00:46:45,590 but I'll give you an example recently from the illicit finance front, the United Arab Emirates, 473 00:46:45,890 --> 00:46:49,370 which is an ally of the UK in many respects, 474 00:46:49,370 --> 00:46:56,420 has just been removed from the grey list of the Financial Action Task Force after having been on that green list for under two years. 475 00:46:56,810 --> 00:47:02,810 It is broadly agreed between experts that the UAE didn't do much in order to get out of that grey list. 476 00:47:03,260 --> 00:47:10,790 Uh, but geopolitically, the imperative is that states such as the UK have a strong relationship with that Middle Eastern state. 477 00:47:11,060 --> 00:47:14,959 So where do values meet interests in practice? 478 00:47:14,960 --> 00:47:16,250 That's my my question. 479 00:47:16,250 --> 00:47:25,310 Well, I off the top of my head, I think it was slightly unfairly characterising the Fatf and the way Britain works with with Fatf. 480 00:47:25,760 --> 00:47:32,389 I think you see we, we, we do try and get our friends of the greatest. 481 00:47:32,390 --> 00:47:38,299 We do try to we work with them to satisfy the authorities so that they can come up further. 482 00:47:38,300 --> 00:47:43,879 But equally, there are others who who go on to it where, where reasons of national interest would dictate. 483 00:47:43,880 --> 00:47:49,900 We might try and stop it. We don't do that. We try and work with them to put right the things that that got them underfed often. 484 00:47:50,450 --> 00:48:01,250 And, um, I can't, uh, remember why the UAE cleared the hurdle, but I think you may be putting a pejorative, uh, reflection on it. 485 00:48:01,520 --> 00:48:03,950 I mean, you know, the the. We are working. 486 00:48:03,950 --> 00:48:15,169 When I came back and saw the, uh, the lack of, uh, funding, um, I what I wanted to try and do was to find ways of multiplying the funding. 487 00:48:15,170 --> 00:48:22,249 And so, for example, the use of guarantees, I mean, Britain has produced £6 billion of guarantees, 488 00:48:22,250 --> 00:48:29,180 all of which has meant people the World Bank's got the African Development Bank particularly, which is very inventive in this space. 489 00:48:29,690 --> 00:48:36,530 These guarantees they they are sometimes serious multipliers are multipliers for us because this does not score as Oda. 490 00:48:37,100 --> 00:48:39,049 Uh, so it's way above the Oda limits. 491 00:48:39,050 --> 00:48:46,370 But but uh, what it what it means is that if you give these guarantees, they can lend and sometimes they can lend to multiple of the guarantee. 492 00:48:47,030 --> 00:48:50,570 The reason why we put so much effort into this in these insurance pools, 493 00:48:50,780 --> 00:48:56,210 which are now paying out both in the Caribbean and in East Africa, is because that is a multiplier. 494 00:48:56,600 --> 00:49:04,759 Um, and, uh, you know, the, the stars, the 4 billion stars, which Jeremy agreed could go and fund the two, 495 00:49:04,760 --> 00:49:12,889 uh, anti-poverty funds of the IMF, so worth £5.3 billion, none of that schools out of. 496 00:49:12,890 --> 00:49:16,810 But it's all multipliers getting more money into the international system and 497 00:49:17,060 --> 00:49:23,780 and we're also doing it we're doing joint financing on issues where we agree. 498 00:49:23,780 --> 00:49:33,630 So this is part of the answer to your question. So with with with Gulf states, with with the UAE, with uh, Kate, uh, with uh, Saudi, uh, 499 00:49:33,650 --> 00:49:38,750 we're doing uh, these deal with there are geographies where we both want to do things together, 500 00:49:39,020 --> 00:49:45,590 and there are issues of climate or humanitarian relief or, or, uh, green finance or whatever else we want to do together. 501 00:49:45,890 --> 00:49:50,660 We put our money alongside their money and we pursue a joint objective. 502 00:49:50,660 --> 00:49:54,530 So, you know, it's a sort of bog off arrangement for British taxpayers. 503 00:49:54,530 --> 00:49:58,280 Buy one, get one free. Um, and it's the same thing for the Saudis. 504 00:49:58,280 --> 00:50:00,680 So, you know, I think that's a very good thing to do. 505 00:50:00,740 --> 00:50:09,080 Uh, I am conscious that, uh, um, and I, uh, we all remember Jamal Khashoggi and all these things, but the point is. 506 00:50:09,520 --> 00:50:15,340 Here we are working in a targeted way to do good and to pursue British objectives. 507 00:50:15,790 --> 00:50:23,070 We are working with them on issues where we have a common view, and in geographies where we both want to help. 508 00:50:23,080 --> 00:50:28,790 And, you know, I will be going to China shortly to talk to people and development in China. 509 00:50:28,810 --> 00:50:33,660 We did a lot more of this back in 2010. Uh, 2011, 2012 indeed. 510 00:50:33,670 --> 00:50:37,600 We before the Busan Aid Effectiveness Conference, 511 00:50:37,600 --> 00:50:44,409 we got both China and India into the outer ring of the OECD DAC in the teeth of American opposition to. 512 00:50:44,410 --> 00:50:47,020 But Britain managed to agree that negotiated. 513 00:50:47,410 --> 00:50:52,960 So I'm going there to see what we could do together on China in a very hostile environment politically at the moment. 514 00:50:53,410 --> 00:50:58,989 And, you know, people say, why do we uniquely have an embassy in Tehran when other countries, 515 00:50:58,990 --> 00:51:03,130 when other Western countries don't have the answer to all those questions is the same? 516 00:51:03,140 --> 00:51:06,700 You know, we have to do business with these countries if we refuse it. 517 00:51:06,720 --> 00:51:13,660 Some of my parliamentary colleagues want us to have anything to do with China, you know, how do we negotiate serious climate agreements? 518 00:51:13,870 --> 00:51:18,430 How do we make progress on things that we and they want to progress? 519 00:51:18,730 --> 00:51:21,760 How do we make the international system what's left of it work at all? 520 00:51:22,120 --> 00:51:29,920 And that my answer is, you know, you have to have links and drive forward on issues which, 521 00:51:30,070 --> 00:51:33,700 uh, matter to them and matter to us and where we need to speak. 522 00:51:33,700 --> 00:51:38,350 And, you know, the intelligence services of all these countries always have back channels to each other. 523 00:51:38,530 --> 00:51:42,490 Let's be sensible and pragmatic. Thank you Minister. 524 00:51:42,610 --> 00:51:45,960 And on that note, we're going to open the floor to questions. 525 00:51:45,970 --> 00:51:52,030 I would ask the members of the audience to raise your your arm, uh, your hand, uh, please, uh, 526 00:51:52,030 --> 00:51:59,500 identify yourself and keep your question as brief as you can, uh, so that we can get as many questions as possible. 527 00:51:59,580 --> 00:52:03,130 Larry. Sorry. Someone's coming. 528 00:52:03,280 --> 00:52:08,070 Just a second. All right. 529 00:52:08,830 --> 00:52:12,450 Natalie Woods, thanks a lot. Uh, great. Uh, panel discussion. 530 00:52:12,750 --> 00:52:19,110 Uh, quick question. Um, the emphasis on sweating the balance sheets at the multilateral is terrific. 531 00:52:19,410 --> 00:52:26,550 Expanding the SDGs, etc. Which powerful countries most need persuading of that case? 532 00:52:27,150 --> 00:52:37,170 Who's in the way in the SDGs have still not made their way into the, um, poverty fund at the at the IMF and the the traditionally, 533 00:52:37,170 --> 00:52:43,880 some big shareholders in the bank have resisted the fantastic measures that you were talking about. 534 00:52:43,890 --> 00:52:47,430 So where is it? We should put our efforts in persuading other governments. 535 00:52:47,730 --> 00:52:53,260 Which ones do you think we should be trying to persuade? Okay, so so that's to me, is it? 536 00:52:54,060 --> 00:52:58,470 So yes. Yes yes yes. Good, good. 537 00:52:58,960 --> 00:53:02,160 Nick any question? I thank you, Nick Westcott. 538 00:53:02,190 --> 00:53:13,200 Uh, so now, um, you hinted yourself many that, um, conflict is the one thing that hinders development, increases poverty faster than anything else. 539 00:53:13,720 --> 00:53:18,450 Uh, how much of our aid budget is going to continue to be devoted to conflict prevention? 540 00:53:18,630 --> 00:53:26,160 And how are we going to do it now? As you said, the multilateral system is decaying, and that was the instrument we tended to use in the past. 541 00:53:26,340 --> 00:53:30,980 How are we going to do it now? Thank you, thank you. And we have two questions here Peter Leone. 542 00:53:30,990 --> 00:53:34,660 And then someone there. Oh, that one here. Thanks. 543 00:53:34,680 --> 00:53:38,700 Uh, Peter Leone, question for the minister then a very quick one for Steffen, 544 00:53:38,730 --> 00:53:45,570 which you find very easy, I think, um, to the minister, uh, you talked about the G20. 545 00:53:45,580 --> 00:53:52,950 Uh, and I just want to ask you about Zambia, because that seems to me to epitomise the problems with the G20 debt arrangement, 546 00:53:52,950 --> 00:53:56,490 where China has not really come to the party properly. 547 00:53:56,790 --> 00:54:06,540 Sam has got $13 billion of debt, spending 39% of its budget on debt servicing as a result of what happened under the Lugar administration. 548 00:54:07,050 --> 00:54:12,810 Uh, so my question is, is the model working satisfactorily and where do you see it headed? 549 00:54:13,500 --> 00:54:17,580 Uh, my question, Steffen, is you talk about fragile states in West Africa. 550 00:54:17,910 --> 00:54:23,880 How does one address the issue of Bognor and wants no replace it and Russia. 551 00:54:24,930 --> 00:54:28,410 In the West region. Thank you. And the question of. 552 00:54:33,470 --> 00:54:37,340 Hi, I'm Peter Evans, a freelancer and part of the Brain drain, I guess. 553 00:54:37,960 --> 00:54:42,440 I hope, I hope I can say brain. I just wanted to ask you about the pecking order. 554 00:54:43,400 --> 00:54:50,480 Thank you. The pecking order of issues in the white paper, and the mention of David Cameron and the reassurance of having him working with them again, 555 00:54:50,960 --> 00:54:54,940 and open societies and democratic governance and the sort of the valued, 556 00:54:55,040 --> 00:54:56,420 um focussed offer, 557 00:54:57,230 --> 00:55:03,590 because the kind of compromises that Stefan mentioned about having to work with very difficult partners who don't necessarily share our values, 558 00:55:03,860 --> 00:55:06,650 it does put a strain on on that part of our package. 559 00:55:06,710 --> 00:55:14,000 I just wondered how you how you sort of circle the square or square the circle in terms of all those things and, um, open societies. 560 00:55:14,300 --> 00:55:17,030 Thank you. Emerson. Thank you. 561 00:55:17,570 --> 00:55:27,830 So, um, first of all, to, uh, Larry, who very generously agreed to be part of my, uh, advisory team and the white paper is an awful lot. 562 00:55:27,860 --> 00:55:33,890 Uh, the first meeting of the advisory team, which helped us to frame it, the sort of chapter headings. 563 00:55:33,950 --> 00:55:37,910 A lot of them came out of that. So thank you very much indeed for that. 564 00:55:38,330 --> 00:55:46,670 Um, the, the I had a meeting with the governor of the bank, but the stars, because stars affect different economies in different ways. 565 00:55:46,670 --> 00:55:50,420 So so our use of the stars, I have to be careful. 566 00:55:50,420 --> 00:55:58,430 I get this right. Affects the sort of contingent liability on the national balance sheet for which the Bank of England are responsible. 567 00:55:58,430 --> 00:56:00,979 And so we've asked him and actually, he, you know, 568 00:56:00,980 --> 00:56:05,660 he was kind enough to say that he wasn't on top of this to go and do some more work on it and come back to us. 569 00:56:05,660 --> 00:56:10,100 But we are trying to press for much greater use of the stars. 570 00:56:10,490 --> 00:56:13,910 And Jeremy Hunt has engaged seriously with us on this. 571 00:56:14,200 --> 00:56:24,589 Try and get better, use them. And you know, the the French also the French say that they want to use 40% of their stars, and we've used 20% of ours. 572 00:56:24,590 --> 00:56:29,180 And it would be very good if we could get some more to the African Development Bank and other countries, 573 00:56:29,180 --> 00:56:33,200 uh, and try and do that would be very good for that financing system. 574 00:56:33,530 --> 00:56:37,160 But, you know, I haven't actually done it uh, yet. 575 00:56:37,700 --> 00:56:43,759 Uh, and so there are technical difficulties and we're working to try and, uh, deal with that. 576 00:56:43,760 --> 00:56:48,510 In your question about which countries need to do more. 577 00:56:48,530 --> 00:56:53,540 I mean, I think all countries need to there's a problem with the states, which is their electoral cycle. 578 00:56:53,780 --> 00:57:02,630 And Congress, of course. Um, uh, but but everyone needs to pull together in the international system and play that part. 579 00:57:03,020 --> 00:57:08,209 And it is much more difficult now for the reasons that I, uh, set out, uh, 580 00:57:08,210 --> 00:57:15,710 Nick and so as a conflict, I mean, uh, conflict is development in reverse as a very great, 581 00:57:16,310 --> 00:57:25,370 um, professor at this university once said, um, and so what we're trying to do is to stop and policy is directed at all three of these things. 582 00:57:25,700 --> 00:57:33,710 Stop conflict starting once it started, bring it to a conclusion, and once it's over, try and reconcile people. 583 00:57:34,280 --> 00:57:37,009 Um, and it is unbelievably difficult. There's the white paper. 584 00:57:37,010 --> 00:57:45,620 There are the tools for doing some of this, one of which is the Resilience and Adaptation Fund, which I talked about in my opening remarks. 585 00:57:45,920 --> 00:57:55,970 Uh, Billy is specifically charged to do more in the smaller, poorer countries and conflict affected countries. 586 00:57:56,390 --> 00:58:02,570 It is very, very difficult. And of course, they need a bit of scale in order to wash their face. 587 00:58:02,960 --> 00:58:09,170 So, you know, sometimes there are funds which can be in different countries, one fund, one big fund, 588 00:58:09,170 --> 00:58:15,590 and it can operate in a number of different ways with a local manager with an overall, um, number of projects. 589 00:58:15,590 --> 00:58:20,890 So, you know, they are very inventive and we are looking, um, very carefully at the, 590 00:58:20,900 --> 00:58:29,090 on the, uh, the refusenik from DfID, uh, whose return we are very much one um, uh, 591 00:58:29,660 --> 00:58:35,210 you know, I mean, I was quite, I was in, uh, Zambia and was, uh, you know, 592 00:58:35,720 --> 00:58:40,100 at the time when they were on the cusp and then they sort of got what they needed from the IMF. 593 00:58:41,000 --> 00:58:45,709 Um, and since when, as you rightly say, it's gone backwards. I mean, the problem here is that the debt we are dealing with, 594 00:58:45,710 --> 00:58:54,200 we don't want to get into a position where all the enthusiasm for the debt forgiveness and hyping, which drove big change. 595 00:58:54,620 --> 00:59:00,919 And then, uh, opponents of development cynically say, well, you know, you've done all that now they've all borrowed again and they're indebted again. 596 00:59:00,920 --> 00:59:07,640 And, and we're going back to square one would be very damaging for the aims that all of us in this room share. 597 00:59:07,850 --> 00:59:12,860 Uh, so, so I think it's important to recognise that the debt is different this time. 598 00:59:13,400 --> 00:59:17,450 You know, it's not, uh, debt like it was before. It's debt to China. 599 00:59:17,450 --> 00:59:23,750 It's debt to Middle Eastern countries, particularly. Um, and the G20 is not sufficient. 600 00:59:24,140 --> 00:59:29,990 But I think there are ways of enhancing the, uh, G20, uh, mechanisms. 601 00:59:31,000 --> 00:59:32,530 And we have to do more. 602 00:59:32,560 --> 00:59:39,490 We are fortunately aided by the fact that this is the reason why markets around the world have gone up in the last couple of months. 603 00:59:39,980 --> 00:59:45,700 That it looks as though we got on top of inflation. A channel six check announced today that in the second quarter of this year, 604 00:59:45,700 --> 00:59:51,760 we will be back below 2% inflation and pretty much a very, very significant achievement. 605 00:59:52,150 --> 00:59:55,930 So so that makes the whole business slightly more benign that we're not. 606 00:59:56,140 --> 01:00:03,990 Because we've seen we've seen countries in Africa, uh, paying four times as much in interest and sometimes more than that, 607 01:00:04,000 --> 01:00:12,650 I think, um, in interest um, over recent months, um, as a result, final question about values that you, you, you made. 608 01:00:12,670 --> 01:00:22,060 I mean, you know, it's it's I was in Ethiopia where there is a real danger of a famine 40 years on from, 609 01:00:22,750 --> 01:00:28,059 you know, Live Aid and, uh, Michael Berg and Bob Geldof and so on, there's a real danger. 610 01:00:28,060 --> 01:00:32,030 I managed to go up and see for myself. I've looked through the records and health centres. 611 01:00:32,050 --> 01:00:37,030 I could see what the trend was on the ground. Very, very frightening indeed. 612 01:00:37,030 --> 01:00:46,210 And of course, um, we don't have the ability, which we had back to 40 years ago, to bring relief through Sudan because Sudan is up in flames. 613 01:00:46,690 --> 01:00:52,930 And I will describe the position there as a football has been kicked towards a plate glass window. 614 01:00:53,470 --> 01:00:57,910 It's in flight. We can deflect it if we take the action now. 615 01:00:58,270 --> 01:01:04,240 And we are, I hope, going to take the action. But if we don't take the action, it will smash the plate glass window. 616 01:01:04,660 --> 01:01:11,740 Um, and, and there's an example of, uh, of a country where we need urgently to provide humanitarian help. 617 01:01:12,190 --> 01:01:15,360 Um, we don't agree, uh, with the. 618 01:01:15,550 --> 01:01:20,110 Ethiopia's a good, uh, friend of Britain and, uh, ally Britain. 619 01:01:20,110 --> 01:01:28,419 In some respects, we don't agree with quite a lot of what they do, but we need to keep our eye focussed on the end game. 620 01:01:28,420 --> 01:01:35,830 And, you know, even in a country like Eritrea, with which we have atrocious relations, we just kicked out their ambassador and they won't have ours. 621 01:01:36,280 --> 01:01:42,040 Uh, you know, there is good stuff happening through the multilateral system and Britain's support, sir. 622 01:01:42,940 --> 01:01:50,320 Thank you. Uh, Emily. And then, Stefan, if we could be relatively brief so we can get another round of questions. 623 01:01:50,830 --> 01:01:53,430 So perhaps that minutes when you come back with the second round of answers, 624 01:01:53,440 --> 01:02:01,840 I was wondering what your advice would be for whichever government gets in in terms of just making the case for development and internationalism, 625 01:02:02,080 --> 01:02:06,610 and where actually the pinch points are more, making sure that we can sustain it at home. 626 01:02:06,610 --> 01:02:14,190 What would you, um, sort of top three pieces of advice be, um, to whoever inherits this mantle, our culture. 627 01:02:14,480 --> 01:02:18,219 Okay, so, you know, I was very emphatic, was asked, you know, 628 01:02:18,220 --> 01:02:22,780 we have a minister for International development and for Africa in the room, Minister of the Crown. 629 01:02:22,780 --> 01:02:24,430 And I should answer what we do with thing. 630 01:02:24,820 --> 01:02:36,190 Uh, but I will want to say to very quickly points and that is, you know, um, taking into account all the things the minister was saying. 631 01:02:36,220 --> 01:02:42,520 Um, you know, marketing doesn't come out simply doesn't appear some simply out of nothing. 632 01:02:43,390 --> 01:02:49,330 And it's something that, um, you know, an obsession with stability, for example, 633 01:02:49,330 --> 01:02:54,070 in West Africa and maybe by another geopolitical power or a couple of them, 634 01:02:54,580 --> 01:02:59,530 uh, obsessed with stability is definitely one of the big sources of the instability now, 635 01:03:00,070 --> 01:03:03,490 kind of an obsession to keep the status quo, to keep it as it is, 636 01:03:03,820 --> 01:03:11,680 maybe doing sometimes eight as well as a process, but actually with a bit of an obsession with the status quo in these countries, 637 01:03:11,980 --> 01:03:17,620 gets us to where where the breeding grounds I see from the UK, I don't think, you know, 638 01:03:17,620 --> 01:03:24,459 we are the ones that will be able to contain it, but I do think that I still worry about that. 639 01:03:24,460 --> 01:03:31,030 We're not learning enough from past episodes where it's happening to us in our spaces, in the places where we were very active. 640 01:03:31,330 --> 01:03:39,550 For example, I do regret, uh, maybe it's happening now, but post Afghanistan, there is no serious learning, not just on the conflict side, 641 01:03:39,880 --> 01:03:43,600 but actually also on the development side of how how it is that places where 642 01:03:43,600 --> 01:03:47,709 billions and billions and billions and billions of wind development is into it, 643 01:03:47,710 --> 01:03:53,110 and there is a need for doing that. We need to learn, not least because the world is a very complicated place now. 644 01:03:53,410 --> 01:04:01,719 And I think there is it is an important thing I think needs to happen internally in Fcdo as well to really take these lessons and think, okay, 645 01:04:01,720 --> 01:04:07,420 but what is it that we don't maybe can do so that actually when we come to Wagner we have not a recipe, 646 01:04:07,420 --> 01:04:11,709 but at least some entry points beyond general things, as long as it's development. 647 01:04:11,710 --> 01:04:15,640 Yes, we know development tends to avoid conflict, but that's not where we are now. 648 01:04:15,850 --> 01:04:22,479 How do we rebuild and get, uh, populations to trust, uh, outsiders and governments and whatever? 649 01:04:22,480 --> 01:04:25,510 And so there's work to be done. And definitely learning is central to it. 650 01:04:26,790 --> 01:04:31,200 Thank you, Stefan. And we're going to open the floor for another final round of questions again. 651 01:04:31,440 --> 01:04:38,250 Please introduce yourself, be very brief, and then we'll come back to the minister for a final, uh, set of answers. 652 01:04:38,610 --> 01:04:44,380 Uh, gentleman over there. Thank you. 653 01:04:44,980 --> 01:04:53,010 My queen. I'm a DPhil student here. Um, I have a question about multilateral body governance, which has a narrow part and a broad part so narrowly. 654 01:04:53,020 --> 01:04:56,919 I was wondering if the minister has any thoughts on the proposal by Brad Setser at the Council on Foreign 655 01:04:56,920 --> 01:05:03,100 Relations for the world Bank to be able to issue SDR denominated bonds to really stretch its balance sheet, 656 01:05:03,370 --> 01:05:08,770 which could lead to much bigger flows than the even like 4 billion that he mentioned with reduced capital requirements. 657 01:05:09,310 --> 01:05:12,610 And secondly, and more broadly, I realise that's quite technical. 658 01:05:13,600 --> 01:05:19,989 If he or anyone on the panel has thoughts about governance changes in the governance of these multilateral bodies, 659 01:05:19,990 --> 01:05:25,180 I'm thinking in particular about the head of the world Bank being American and the IMF being European, 660 01:05:25,180 --> 01:05:28,650 and also voting rights, um, in terms of the shareholders thereof. Thanks very much. 661 01:05:28,660 --> 01:05:33,399 Thank you. That's a good question. In the back. Uh oh. 662 01:05:33,400 --> 01:05:37,090 Sorry. Um, hello. My name is George Jones. 663 01:05:37,090 --> 01:05:41,470 I'm a researcher on the Climate Compatible Growth Program, generously funded by the Fcdo. 664 01:05:41,950 --> 01:05:45,309 Um, I have a question about, um, data, 665 01:05:45,310 --> 01:05:51,040 and I suppose the minister mentioned the the most blind funding is obviously a core aim, but it's something that's very, 666 01:05:51,040 --> 01:05:59,079 very hard to do on the ground without good quality data upon, um, risk and, and projects, um, particularly when it comes to adaptation and resilience. 667 01:05:59,080 --> 01:06:06,910 A lot of these are locally deployed projects where it isn't really the infrastructure for, uh, monitoring and evaluation at the moment. 668 01:06:07,360 --> 01:06:13,450 Um, and that's something that I haven't seen much of in terms of financial sector deepening either through FSD Africa or otherwise. 669 01:06:13,930 --> 01:06:19,390 Um, so I'm wondering if that's something the minister could, I could see being a further priority and how that might happen. 670 01:06:20,410 --> 01:06:23,970 Charles, I have a couple of questions from the online audience. 671 01:06:23,980 --> 01:06:28,210 One relates to the question. Just a second, Charles, and not sure if we can hear you. 672 01:06:28,240 --> 01:06:31,930 Thank you. Uh, a couple of questions from the online audience. 673 01:06:31,930 --> 01:06:34,749 One relates to one we've had already about the, um, 674 01:06:34,750 --> 01:06:40,570 what needs to happen to international organisations and extending it to the UN family of organisations. 675 01:06:41,350 --> 01:06:46,959 Uh, what needs to be done about reforming international organisations beyond the 676 01:06:46,960 --> 01:06:51,790 Bretton Woods organisations to the UN family in a complex multipolar world? 677 01:06:52,630 --> 01:06:57,580 That's remark taken. Francis guy asks um, does the, um, 678 01:06:57,580 --> 01:07:05,770 excellent commitments to um climate finance will inevitably come at the expense of money going into poverty alleviation? 679 01:07:06,310 --> 01:07:12,090 Thank you, Charles. And I should add that our online audience following us is roughly double the one that you see in the room. 680 01:07:12,100 --> 01:07:16,120 So, um, is there a final question or two or. 681 01:07:16,600 --> 01:07:21,980 There's a question here. Again if you could introduce yourself. 682 01:07:22,700 --> 01:07:26,030 Thank you. I'm Adam Sparks. I'm a master's student here at Department of International Development. 683 01:07:26,320 --> 01:07:29,110 Mr. I'm grateful for your comments on the dependencies. 684 01:07:29,600 --> 01:07:34,580 I grew up in Guernsey, and at the time that you, Margaret, uh, visited regarding beneficial ownership, 685 01:07:34,590 --> 01:07:38,750 I remember the destitution, um, in the office that I interned at the States of Guernsey. 686 01:07:39,320 --> 01:07:46,010 Um, but you're entirely right, um, that the Crown dependencies have been very slow to implement beneficial ownership registries. 687 01:07:46,340 --> 01:07:50,149 Um, but do you think that Crown dependency example is representative of the UK? 688 01:07:50,150 --> 01:07:53,960 And I'm thinking in particular at the City of London, um, more broadly. 689 01:07:54,140 --> 01:08:00,650 So over the summer I worked with the Indonesian um, taxation Authority, and they have real trouble in doing domestic revenue mobilisation. 690 01:08:00,950 --> 01:08:07,040 Um, when they try to initiate taxation investigations, um, it's particularly difficult to get information from HMRC. 691 01:08:07,550 --> 01:08:11,060 Um, so I'm wondering what sort of cost is that to the city? 692 01:08:11,420 --> 01:08:15,530 Um, if you did pursue a policy that challenges its pre-eminence as a global financial centre? 693 01:08:16,100 --> 01:08:23,300 Thank you. Thank you very much, Minister. So is there anything that you'd like to address before I give the words, the Minister first words. 694 01:08:23,500 --> 01:08:30,050 Right. Um, is this the last row? Yes. So just looking at the time to check, I think you have to leave in six minutes. 695 01:08:30,410 --> 01:08:34,880 So I just about we were told I was worried about, uh, keeping them too long. 696 01:08:35,720 --> 01:08:42,470 So, look, on the last point, uh, you make, um, I'm pleased that, uh, our visit had an impact in Guernsey. 697 01:08:42,860 --> 01:08:49,110 I mean, the the the. The problem with this whole business. 698 01:08:49,130 --> 01:08:54,690 There's a chap called Oliver Bullock who writes very good books on, and they're well worth reading. 699 01:08:54,710 --> 01:08:58,340 I normally find readers like Stefan's book. I pick it up. 700 01:08:58,340 --> 01:09:04,639 You can't put it down. It's so good. But the point is that, uh, the baddies have all the best tunes. 701 01:09:04,640 --> 01:09:10,610 You see, the baddies can employ the best lawyers, the best accountants, um, the best people. 702 01:09:10,610 --> 01:09:18,920 And and and the the government is like the, you know, the CBI, the poor bloody infantry, they're following behind, trying to keep up and catch up. 703 01:09:19,250 --> 01:09:25,580 And the law when we change the laws, we've had a number of, uh, economic, uh, reform and corruption bills. 704 01:09:26,210 --> 01:09:33,650 The, um, you know, the more we try and we're normally closing things and the new loopholes are found by these clever people who advise. 705 01:09:33,650 --> 01:09:43,070 And it's a it's a very difficult situation. And, um, basically, we we are making some progress and, and open registers where we will get there. 706 01:09:43,070 --> 01:09:46,250 There's been a big change in America actually towards there, not open registers. 707 01:09:46,250 --> 01:09:48,680 There's a big change in terms of transparency. 708 01:09:49,040 --> 01:09:55,040 It's transparency we have to go after, because that is how you, you know, sunlight is the best disinfectant. 709 01:09:55,040 --> 01:10:02,960 And the horrific figure is that 40% of all the money laundering goes through London or overseas territories or CDs, 710 01:10:03,320 --> 01:10:08,090 you know, which means we've we've got questions to answer on this and we must get better. 711 01:10:08,090 --> 01:10:17,239 And I've been I've been winding up the Foreign Secretary to to do more on the list because he was the bloke who did the G8 summit, um, which, which, 712 01:10:17,240 --> 01:10:24,110 which imposed open reticence on Britain and haven't worked as well as they should because of the nature of companies House, 713 01:10:24,110 --> 01:10:28,610 which is a library I'm not investigating, ever, but that we've now changed the law on that. 714 01:10:28,940 --> 01:10:35,540 And there will be due investigations and, uh, you know, the, the when these cases happen, 715 01:10:35,540 --> 01:10:39,080 like the one you described from Indonesia, make sure ministers know because, 716 01:10:39,440 --> 01:10:44,730 you know, the HMRC is we have people around the world, uh, uh, 717 01:10:45,080 --> 01:10:50,719 exporting the HMRC skills to show other countries how to run their revenue, uh services. 718 01:10:50,720 --> 01:10:58,240 Um, uh, and uh, uh, you know, so, so I mean making sure we know so we can have a look at it on the Indonesia desk. 719 01:10:58,250 --> 01:11:02,300 The Foreign Office can have a look and see what we can do to help is very important. 720 01:11:02,750 --> 01:11:07,330 Um, the the person who asked a question about whether or not, uh, 721 01:11:07,370 --> 01:11:12,860 climate finance is at the expense of poverty alleviation, I think that was the the question. 722 01:11:13,160 --> 01:11:18,140 Um, I don't believe it is. And I believe like a Venn diagram, there's an enormous middle business. 723 01:11:18,650 --> 01:11:25,130 Um, and, you know, the Prime Minister knows that from 2019 we would increase, uh, um, 724 01:11:25,280 --> 01:11:32,870 the amount of money we were spending, uh, each year, uh, from 500 billion to 1.5 billion on adaptation. 725 01:11:32,870 --> 01:11:41,240 We have the commitment to 11.6 billion on climate, uh, funding by, uh, 2026. 726 01:11:41,630 --> 01:11:45,770 You know, these there's an awful lot of stuff that's in the middle of the Venn diagram, 727 01:11:45,770 --> 01:11:52,520 which I think prevents us from falling into the trap, which you, uh, identified reforming international organisations. 728 01:11:53,000 --> 01:11:58,940 I mean, this is terribly difficult, of course, because the UN is basically built on the post-World War Two settlement. 729 01:11:59,120 --> 01:12:04,489 Um, Britain has made it clear, we think that the Security Council needs to be expanded. 730 01:12:04,490 --> 01:12:10,460 We think that, uh, Brazil and South Africa, Nigeria, Germany, we think it needs to be expanded. 731 01:12:10,820 --> 01:12:18,469 It's incredibly difficult. And of course, it's something which, uh, Secretary-General will only embrace in the second term of office, 732 01:12:18,470 --> 01:12:24,620 because it's going to create a lot of difficulty. And there are people who've made a lifetime career of the UN blocking change. 733 01:12:24,620 --> 01:12:26,569 So so it is very difficult. 734 01:12:26,570 --> 01:12:35,420 And, uh, uh, you know, I when I was in opposition, I wrote a pamphlet called, uh, The Failure to Protect about the responsibility to protect, 735 01:12:35,420 --> 01:12:40,850 which ought to be one of the easiest things to, uh, change, but it hasn't really changed. 736 01:12:41,360 --> 01:12:45,290 Uh, to be honest, data, uh, I completely agree. 737 01:12:45,290 --> 01:12:50,269 I thought it would be cruel to FSD Africa, which is an absolutely brilliant organisation. 738 01:12:50,270 --> 01:12:57,020 I'm doing real work to transform the financial systems in countries doing very well. 739 01:12:57,020 --> 01:13:01,040 But the point about data is absolutely critical in the white paper. 740 01:13:01,040 --> 01:13:08,449 There's good stuff on digital and, uh, research, the science of data and so on, which, um, if you probably already seen it. 741 01:13:08,450 --> 01:13:11,599 But if you haven't, do look, because I think it's quite powerful. 742 01:13:11,600 --> 01:13:19,100 And if you have, um, uh, uh, uh, ideas of how we can drive that forward, please do, uh, let us, uh, 743 01:13:19,110 --> 01:13:27,230 no, um, multilateral governance esta, uh, uh, denominated bonds and the governance of the world Bank. 744 01:13:27,530 --> 01:13:32,479 I mean, I think all these things, we need to try and drive forward. They are more difficult in the current context. 745 01:13:32,480 --> 01:13:37,740 But the powerful lead of the IMF, the fact we've got a chancellor, uh, 746 01:13:37,790 --> 01:13:42,230 in London who's very interested in this stuff, the Bank of England, you know, everyone needs to do more. 747 01:13:42,560 --> 01:13:48,930 And if we could get an SDR dominated, uh, bond. That would be terrific, but there are difficulties in achieving that. 748 01:13:48,950 --> 01:13:50,840 We are we are looking at all these things. 749 01:13:51,200 --> 01:13:58,130 And because we've got this very brilliant team in Washington, which AJ Bagga uses to some extent as a bit of a think tank. 750 01:13:58,560 --> 01:14:05,570 Um, we are able to drive these things forward on the, um, very good point you made about the governance of the world Bank. 751 01:14:06,170 --> 01:14:10,750 I mean, it is ridiculous, really, that it should have be done on on merit. 752 01:14:10,760 --> 01:14:25,579 And back in 2012, uh, when, uh, Bob Zelnick, uh, left, uh, many of us tried very hard to subvert, uh, uh, the current system, but it survived. 753 01:14:25,580 --> 01:14:32,600 And, uh, you know, it's the Americans don't put money in, uh, which, uh, threatening not to at the moment. 754 01:14:32,600 --> 01:14:35,839 I mean, they're not friend is going to get through Congress, you know, 755 01:14:35,840 --> 01:14:41,920 that will undermine the American hegemony in the world Bank and not just in the world Bank, 756 01:14:41,960 --> 01:14:46,640 because, of course, they always run the World Food Program and, uh, Unicef and so on. 757 01:14:46,970 --> 01:14:50,090 So, so, so, um, I disagree with this. 758 01:14:50,090 --> 01:14:54,500 I think it should be done on merit. You've got to find a comprehensive way of, uh, deciding. 759 01:14:54,710 --> 01:15:00,580 And of course, when the Chinese bank, uh, which is which we, uh, we have a vice presidency of it, 760 01:15:00,620 --> 01:15:04,910 that Alexander is one of the the, um, uh, the vice presidents there. 761 01:15:05,120 --> 01:15:11,779 It's doing very well. It started really because of the failures of governance, which you mentioned on the world Bank is doing very well. 762 01:15:11,780 --> 01:15:17,660 The Americans are furious with us when we when we agreed to be a core, uh, shareholder. 763 01:15:18,110 --> 01:15:24,170 Um, but actually, you know, it's a proper multilateral bank and it's governed in all the right sort of ways. 764 01:15:24,650 --> 01:15:30,560 Um, finally, uh, two things on, on, on Virginia and France and values and so on. 765 01:15:30,890 --> 01:15:37,219 I mean, the it's extraordinary that France, you know, France is in a terrible position in Africa. 766 01:15:37,220 --> 01:15:42,379 And, uh, we've seen the good and often it is because of the relationship, 767 01:15:42,380 --> 01:15:51,800 whether they decolonised they keeping having deals which are out of date on access to mineral wealth and, 768 01:15:51,800 --> 01:15:56,120 uh, in particular the nuclear mineral wealth, um, uh, uranium, 769 01:15:56,120 --> 01:16:05,419 um, uh, you know, and so this relationship has gone badly wrong, not in our interest, in my view, to, you know, when I was in DfID, 770 01:16:05,420 --> 01:16:11,600 we worked against the Russians and the French and the Chinese in Africa, we now have with the French much more. 771 01:16:11,600 --> 01:16:15,200 And I think that's the right thing to do. And it's extraordinary, too, because Macron, I think, 772 01:16:15,620 --> 01:16:22,850 is by far the most friendly to Africa and understands a different generation from the older people. 773 01:16:23,240 --> 01:16:29,720 But, but, but a real understanding, um, uh, when he had his summit and um, uh, uh, 774 01:16:29,780 --> 01:16:35,870 with the Indians in Paris last year, I heard him speak, uh, on two occasions. 775 01:16:35,990 --> 01:16:39,740 And really, um, I thought it was real depth of understanding. 776 01:16:39,740 --> 01:16:46,819 And so it's a tragedy in a sense that it's on his watch that this has, uh, has happened, but but in the end, it's values. 777 01:16:46,820 --> 01:16:49,880 It's working together, it's localism. 778 01:16:50,390 --> 01:16:55,220 Uh, it's showing people that our values are superior to the values of the Russians and the Chinese. 779 01:16:55,670 --> 01:16:59,360 Um, and also doing some of the good things. 780 01:16:59,570 --> 01:17:05,479 There are a few tiny good things that, uh, in theory, asserts that it does. 781 01:17:05,480 --> 01:17:12,559 I mean, everything involved in does is terrible. And the record in Africa of human rights abuse of pillage is absolutely appalling. 782 01:17:12,560 --> 01:17:18,350 But, you know, if if other countries who have better values provide some security. 783 01:17:18,350 --> 01:17:23,000 So things that matter in these countries, that is something which we should do more to explore. 784 01:17:23,390 --> 01:17:29,750 And finally, making the case for development, uh, if it's all party, it's easier. 785 01:17:30,710 --> 01:17:38,060 I mean, we came very close to defeating the government of defeating Johnson on the point seven very close. 786 01:17:38,420 --> 01:17:48,170 If the speaker had called the amendment to the bill, the RBA bill would spend Oda money and the the amendment very simple, but I think rather clever. 787 01:17:48,500 --> 01:17:53,840 It said that if government doesn't spend 2.7 anything between what it spends 80.5 and point seven, 788 01:17:53,840 --> 01:18:00,200 it has to spend through this innovation act, which spent Oda money and the speaker very near record it. 789 01:18:00,230 --> 01:18:06,500 Had he called it, it would have been an it would have been an epic moment because it would have been the 790 01:18:06,500 --> 01:18:11,540 House of Commons members of Parliament banding together and stopping the executive, 791 01:18:11,540 --> 01:18:12,799 cutting the point. 792 01:18:12,800 --> 01:18:20,030 Seven um, and it would have, uh, it would have humiliated the government because it would have been a moral point as commercial banking. 793 01:18:20,240 --> 01:18:22,940 Anyway, he didn't call the amendment, and there we are. 794 01:18:22,940 --> 01:18:29,330 But but the point is that that, uh, that would have been a very, very good sign indeed and would have driven it forward. 795 01:18:29,840 --> 01:18:36,470 And and in the end, you know, uh, we have set up this new platform called active, 796 01:18:36,860 --> 01:18:45,490 which is a which is joint between the government and the, uh, civil society and civil society are putting money into it. 797 01:18:45,620 --> 01:18:52,790 Governments putting money into it. There are rules which have to be, uh, carefully kept because you can't have a government campaigning, 798 01:18:53,480 --> 01:18:57,050 you know, in a way that appears to take electoral advantage, for example. 799 01:18:57,590 --> 01:19:08,300 But, uh, the active of this new platform, as we get it going and it's beginning to move now, the new foreign secretary is very enthusiastic about it. 800 01:19:08,570 --> 01:19:10,770 That is that will be very helpful as well. 801 01:19:10,790 --> 01:19:17,540 But in the end, standing up for it, I say to people, you know, when you're at the bus stop or in the pub, uh, 802 01:19:17,540 --> 01:19:23,540 or indeed at the Heathrow security, one day when I heard someone say behind, that's the geezer that gives all our money to India. 803 01:19:23,900 --> 01:19:27,430 And he said, um, you know, you're not arguing the toss. 804 01:19:27,440 --> 01:19:31,950 And when people say, well, charity begins at home. So yes, it does, but it doesn't end there. 805 01:19:31,970 --> 01:19:35,390 You know, I think I think we have to stand up for this. 806 01:19:35,750 --> 01:19:42,829 Um, and the thing I am most proud about in my, uh, government career is being part of a government that, 807 01:19:42,830 --> 01:19:49,160 in spite of the austerity that was then faced by Britain and the fact that budgets were being cut, 808 01:19:49,490 --> 01:19:53,090 uh, everywhere in 2010, George Osborne, David Cameron, 809 01:19:53,100 --> 01:19:57,979 they stood by the promise to the poorest people in the world, and they brought in the point seven. 810 01:19:57,980 --> 01:20:00,680 It wasn't a Labour government that did it. It was the coalition. 811 01:20:01,010 --> 01:20:06,530 And it was the conservative leadership of David Cameron and George Osborne which honoured that pledge, 812 01:20:06,530 --> 01:20:12,920 something that Archbishop Desmond Tutu, uh, said that a pledge to the poorest people in the world is a sacred thing. 813 01:20:13,400 --> 01:20:21,080 You know, they did it, and I honour them for that. And I'm enormously proud to have been a member of an administration that did that. 814 01:20:21,110 --> 01:20:25,400 I'm very ashamed that it was thrown back some years later. 815 01:20:26,660 --> 01:20:31,910 Thank you. Minister. Um, it's been a privilege to welcome you back to the Oxford Martin School. 816 01:20:32,390 --> 01:20:39,680 Um, thank you to the minister and Emily Jones and Steffan Durcan for this really, really great event. 817 01:20:39,890 --> 01:20:41,930 Please join me in thanking the speaker.