So welcome everybody.
And we are very fortunate today to host a presentation from the remarkable critical history of the Northern Treasures Research Project.
This is a research project of six persons funded by the French National Research Agency,
whose purpose is to document the history of the junk or northern treasures, traditions of neem oil Buddhism.
Their prolific output so far includes two special editions of the leading to better logical journal
Authority and numerous entries in a highly recommended academic blog called Northern Treasures Histories.
You can find it online quite easily.
The main goal is a complete, critical, annotated study of the large young to children or history of the northern treasures by chewing.
Uh, Stefan Aguiar is a scientific coordinator and will be the main speaker today.
Stefan. The great top ten most unusual kid at the age of 17 and began studying Tibetan.
He won the prestigious Agassi on the philosophy in 1992, and then taught philosophy in high schools for some years.
He defended a PhD on long tenure in 22, followed by I believe in 2009.
Stefan has written a number of well-known books in French,
including translations of Midtum and Grampa, A Study of Longchamp, and Talking to Those Going to.
I believe an English version of the Longchamp book will come soon.
Stefan is currently full professor and associate vice president at in Elko in Paris.
It's Finnish. I'm not associate vice president anymore. Oh yeah.
I'm good. And I finished. A second pillar of the project is doctor Jean-Luc.
Jean-Luc is researcher at the National Centre for Scientific Research, and well known to all of us as the editor of authority Data to Bitcoin.
He specialises in blockchain, both new and born, and is currently working on a blockchain wiki as well as a dictionary.
Adoption terminology. And of course we all know him from numerous publications.
A third pillar is Jay Valentine, associate professor of philosophy and religion at Troy University in Alabama, USA.
Most of his research has been on the history of the Northern Traces tradition,
and he is currently working on a translation of the biography of Greeks in Good Time, whose tenures form its basis.
He too has many publications. The project also has three junior members.
She did her PhD at the year in Paris on the history of the morphic cashew lineage.
Tempered. Sharing. But son graduated from the Central Institute for Higher Tibetan Studies in Varanasi and
from 2019 to 21 was lecturer in Tibetan language and Literature at the University of Bonn.
Since 2021, he has taught Tibetan language in Elko and joined this project in 2022.
He is currently pursuing a PhD in alcohol on the Northern Treasures Masters 20 Drug resistant pyramid.
Trinity. Simon is a research assistant on the project and has published an article about the tragic tobacco sorcery in authority.
So thank you for coming and, uh, very excited to hear your work.
Please. Uh, over to you, Stefan. Thank you very much, Robert, for your nice introduction.
And thank you, everybody for coming. Um, I'm not sure we will, uh, present very new perspectives, but let's try.
So, um. I think it's no use to insist on the project, as it was very well presented, except that you you'll find here the, uh, the, um,
link for the, um, the academic blog that that we've set on the northern treasures histories, which I can actually communicate to you later.
And, uh, so let's let's start. Uh, so, uh, um, uh, the.
Well, we will not be discussing the juncture as such as all but only, uh, one of its two Georgian cycles.
The most famous one, the composition or consumption presented, which was, uh, rightly presented by, uh, Qatar in that opinion as, um, an anthology.
Um, and uh, its special feature, uh, I mean, from a Tibetan perspective is that it is a combination or two.
It is viewed as a combination of the, the tradition of the three with other masters.
That would be Padma samba, VA VA Malami, Transvaal, China.
Uh, so that's interesting as such because, uh, um, the composition title was supposedly reviewed in 1366.
In fact, we can discuss that later. But there is a an issue about the deciphering of the contradict.
Uh, that can be scripts, uh, which um,
which is interesting as such because it means that the terms should not always be dated of the year in which it is said to have been discovered,
because in many cases we see the the corpus. I will discuss that for the community being sort of, uh.
Put down into intelligible writing. Uh, years after it was discovered.
So the the the thing, the thing of the reason, um, some is very important because we are, in fact.
So say, uh, 20 something years after, uh, long jump as a large synthesis of, of the, the two niantic's.
And now we have a third one. I mean, there's a not only a Vimla mitra tradition, the demanding punishment ever tradition, the communistic.
But no, there is something more, which is a bit wasn't, uh, tradition is a bit.
It's another translator, of course.
So anyway, the implicit idea is that of a complete tradition, but a more complete tradition because it has the origin on some,
uh, that the, the, um, the ninja, the oral transmissions from the, the three others.
So from, from this point, traditional point of view through the anthology, because it's a combination of different corpora and,
uh, and it is also one from the point of view of a modern, uh, philologist reader, because it feels, um, pretty composites.
Um, and even not I mean, I'm not including in the anthology.
We can discuss that later with Katharina. We did in her dissertation.
Uh, I'm not including the grand share with to which to me, something altogether different.
Mhm. So, uh.
So I will cast the female ammeter and vote on the traditions.
Aside from this presentation. We could discuss them, but, uh, the female led me to a tradition.
Female led me to a corpus is basically one very large text called the image of the junta masters called image.
It's not the title in the in the book, plus several entries.
What is interesting and we could discuss and, uh,
that's mostly George could discuss that is that things that are presented in the demanding as the manga.
Uh, reappear really in the nearly the same form in the, uh, in the composition as tantrums.
That's something I will not discuss. And then as for the vital channel corpus, there are at least four new images.
Um, which I will also not discuss.
Uh, which, uh, interesting. I mean, they really have a style. I mean, these corpora are not just literary fictions.
They they, for any reason, could be very skilful pastiche, I don't know, but they don't have the same characteristics.
Uh, for example, as pointed by some commentators, there are differences in the, uh, the presentation of the full visions of the,
the the time when you pass from the one to the next according to the five millimetre or the Padma,
some other corpus that was noted by Longchamp, and this is found also inside the composition.
So it didn't go then, did not make it consistent. And, uh, so in the corpus, you don't have these elaborate discussions on the luminous visions.
It's more about the distinction of semantic the, the, uh, bardo states and things like that.
Okay. So I just guess this aside. So. Sorry.
Um. Now, as for the biomass and beverage tradition in the.
So a remark that that is a bit amusing or puzzling is that there is no.
It seems to me that there is no consistent narrative. On how these the traditions of the three we are masters got compiled and uh, um, sort of.
Yeah. Uh, against as a,
as a one were called the comparison tell the main narrative that you find in the term is mostly about the pants and other tradition and um.
And in fact, the points to the starting point of all this presentation is that if we cast the v millimetre and vital channel materials aside,
what remains of the total is pretty similar to the communicating.
So I will present in two parts. Uh, I would summarise because of course it's only the details that are interesting and we don't have time for details,
but I will, uh, present things from the hotel to the condo and then from the condo linked to the hotel.
So first, something, uh, interesting is that the massively or mainly, uh, centrally describes itself as a muslim tradition,
although it contains also these elements ascribed to Vimla mitra, or later channel.
And in fact, it even describes itself as a larger version of the community.
So this is a not so not self obvious even for the followers of that tradition.
But here is a prophecy, uh, that is uh, in in the title.
Uh, that, uh, actually shows that, uh, well, that in reading good times understanding basically the,
the, the sorry, the component that is the condoning uh, the same thing.
Well, what it can mean is open to discussion. So, but the, the idea is there.
So. I've presented the Tibet Index because it's quite puzzling, so it's worth having it.
For those who can read it, and under your eyes while I discuss the well on the basis of the translation.
So says the great. The last fully complete version was hidden at the lone Rock in London.
Boomtown. So that's puzzling because, uh.
Uh, what what what was found in Boomtown, which is connected to the condo.
Niantic. So it could be various things. Of course, it cannot be linked, but because it's much anterior, it's much prior to a permalink this time.
But it it might be that it might show that, uh,
it didn't go them was aware of what Longchamp had been doing about that would be the condo that would be launched in that scandal, possibly.
It could also be, well, that's what I wrote, that it was it should be noted that it could also be the,
in fact, the long sell tantra that was said to be hidden and found in Boomtown.
So the long sale for those who are not specialists is the 18th century, the 17th centuries of the 19th.
Plus the normal tumour as the 18th. But the other 18th is the long cell.
So which is the supposedly the basis of the community in complement to the 17th centuries.
So then it was abbreviated and its summary is hidden at the very gated rock in the country of the poor.
So this is the, uh, uh, findings of the community proper.
The complete version that focuses on the meaning is hidden in some sort of ladder, so that's obviously driven by something.
It doesn't allow dogs the place where it's in good and found all his treasures, but it could possibly also be the wrong answer.
But there are no affinities between the organisation and the community.
In my perception, the one in which contemplation is the main thing,
which conforms to the effortless aspect of the practice is in the belly of the Naga demon, uh, at the southern rock.
Sorry, there's at missing in maybe so I cannot discuss that, but it's, um,
plain from the context that it's a term about your intending to build the attitude of a teacher.
So I was just mentioned in passing. The importance is a chain link.
That is the person who gave the, uh, the key and uh, maybe key and cajon of the,
of the Tama to primarily jail cell and then received it from payment itself.
And he was a contemporary of Longchamp and survived in by a few years.
Uh, he was from the previous generation is contemporary of Gelson JLC but he had a long life.
He lived for eight years, so he outlived, uh, long temper.
And the complete method for liberating one single individual is hidden in the best in in show.
So this is also referring to, uh, returning back.
Uh, it's described in his biography that he, he had a vision of, uh, um, uh, Pamela Jensen after Pamela Anderson, uh, had had passed away.
And, uh, and this is in that place, and then that's how he was told where he would find the text,
uh, that it where it would be brought, the text that had been revealed by him.
So that's a summary of the. That's my deciphering of the prophecy.
So it's in my original paper. If you want all the arguments to prove that it's, uh, it's the it's the case.
So I'm just a bit perplexed about the first one and the,
the I it would be the only trace I know in good times revelations that he was aware of of, uh, of Longchamp as discoveries, uh, writings.
Uh, but as I said, it could be also the country itself.
It would make sense if it would be the nominal barometer. And also it could be link back.
That's another hypothesis, but we're not.
Uh, the interest is that some of those best terms are put in the same category in the region of which I would discuss later,
and I think some were found in Boomtown, but I'm not very good at dodging.
So that's that's something that is for us to research in the future.
So, uh, maybe Katarina will not agree, but, uh, the, um, the.
For me, the boundaries of the Pima section of the hotel is not clearly marked in the corpus.
Uh, so it would seem to me to include everything that is not explicitly bima or bero and, uh, so, uh,
except, uh, some large tensions in the comparison are, um, very akin to materials found in the B mining.
So, no, I would present shortly because it would be too long to do it.
But the things the other way round from the from the community to the until.
So I made a provisional table. It's also in my region in the paper.
Uh, but, uh, I mean, it's very provisional and I think, uh,
only because since that time we compared the text more carefully and surely found many, I mean, more precise and relevant things.
On the question and important point I just say in passing is that the, um, the Compass Centre does not quote extensively the Long Self Tantra.
In fact, it's just quoted maybe twice or three times in passage that may even have been added later.
I mean, it's it's not as if didn't go them had was very familiar to the this tantra which is
supposed to be the background of the community and that's as such an argument against,
uh, against myself, against what I'm trying to to show.
So in, in this table, I tried to, um, to show what is parallel between the two.
And I put so on the, the column on the left, you have, uh, the containing as we have, it's appended to long chambers writings,
which as such is a bit strange because it's not that common that a corpus that is not supposed to be, uh, master's term is found in his writings.
On the second column, they put, uh, a catalogue of what I call lunatic 1984.
So that's, uh, a little book, I mean, a little manuscript that I,
I randomly bought when I was in Nepal long ago and which in fact is, uh, uh, very, very interesting manuscript.
It's, uh, maybe you know, it. It's a small volume. I have it somewhere.
I'll show you after I think I put a picture of it, that at some point, uh, it's a small volume and it's,
it's presented as, uh, of from a and maybe incomplete and disordered manuscript from the Library of Lima, so on.
So and in fact, it's an extremely interesting version of the kind of trick because, uh,
it's easy when you read the manuscript to, to see that it comes from original link, better engineering per tradition.
And it does not go further than like 1 or 2 generations of the original link.
So it means it was. Copied from an 15th century original, and it retains some,
surely some aspects of the contradicting before being edited by Longchamp or independently of what Longchamp may have added or subtracted and all.
That's why it's pretty interesting. So, um, what do we have that can be compared?
We have some, uh, narratives, but the narrative is quite different.
Like that is not in the composition until this famous story of the Princess Marcel, you know,
who dies and is revived by some other just to receive the community and then re dies to be later reborn
as permanently in the discovery of the kind of something that is common is also the third world cycle.
So this is, you know, the tensions that, uh, liberates through being worn on your body normally or under your armpits, basically.
But that's not super specific. I mean, this could be found as well to.
You know, because I mean, it's in fact, we've been discussing that very much with, uh, Jean-Luc.
And the problem is that many to incorporate a sort of overlapping.
So you cannot very easily identify, uh, one branch, uh, from the main bulk of the, of the enigmatic listening type of doctrine context.
And, uh, it's like many corpora of parts of others,
but you cannot easily set them into families that would the one family would have this feature and not not not the others,
I mean, in a very distinctive way. But that's what I'm trying to do.
In fact, it's trying to say, is there a sort of continuity family within the, uh, the structure in the literature?
So the Dugdale cycle is not also very specific feature.
What is more specific is a five implement system. Uh in the in the be mining take basically you have four and Parliament's.
Uh it means that the Capital One is included in the fourth or is is presented as a sub division of the fourth,
but it's sort of aligned on the general high attentions or empowerment system.
While in the condoning tech you clearly have five and this feature is also found in the composition.
That means the the repeats element is made a fifth uh, empowerment and not confused with the fourth.
So then you have this cycle of the Testaments, the. But this also is not a very specific, uh, feature.
Now, what is more specific is this, uh, practice of the five families, the ringer.
So, in fact, in the communistic system of practice, uh, you have this, uh, practice for the first empowerment, uh,
corresponding to the boom on the vows, initiation or atonement, uh, which is connected to the so-called, uh, ringer.
So there is tied up and up and in the conversations that you would find a sound group also.
But, uh, uh, this is, uh, what, to put it simply, is like the peaceful and wrathful deities, but it's the manual of the five, the Buddhas and and all.
And that's that's that seems to be, um.
Yeah. I mean, it's very homogeneous between the, uh, the, the going percentile and the, um.
Uh, I'm going to. Well, that's just more on the same stuff.
Well, yeah. That's for example, you have a good example that you text with exactly the same title.
This. This number is infecting, uh, and when the 114 something, it it means that it's, uh, number 14 in volume one in the asm dupa edition.
So I've not made the work, but in fact, plenty of the, the common texts are either in volume one or in volume for, for any reason.
But not all this. For example, this is in volume three talks about the signs of accomplishment.
So this is also not that specific.
I mean, it would be only a further comparison that would show whether basically it comes from the demanding but through the comparison,
sorry, through the condoning or not. So that that's the issue in fact.
Spider teachings also can be compared but do not have to be identical.
Tulane practice appears in both corpora, but in the in the current intake is, uh, you want to do insulin while in the, uh, the, uh, uh, composite.
It's two Tulane practice. Tulane with a just you are fasting, just taking water and nothing else.
Protectors are not the same. Exactly. Guru yoga is not, in that case, the same.
Because in the in the until you would find a guru yoga with, uh, the millimetre which is more typical of the of the demonic to.
Now that's more interesting. And maybe that's that's what we're finally.
There's more on the actual cycle, but this is not very specific.
But then the practices of the virtual variety and I agree were corresponding to the third and fourth sorry, second and third mistake and performance.
Uh, these are really common. These are almost identical.
And I will not have time to develop. But there is an appendix to written Good and Revelations by Tenney.
Link back and master was active at this beginning of the 16th century.
And the idea which in fact is in very large development,
and something that is already present in the kind of tech is the sort of inner yoga practices of the community.
So this is clearly, uh, in that I mean, that that's nearly what inspired this idea.
Um, to me, I mean, that the, the, the, um, the composition and the controlling goals are so closely connected.
So, I mean, that was just very superficial overview, but, uh, it shows at least what should be compared carefully.
And then it's only the very precise philological comparison that will show whether, um, and it didn't go them is sort of producing a hyper term to,
uh, in fact, in the, um, the, uh, transcending the paper I was mentioning, I think I more or less proof that link po was written.
Good instruction, master. So it means that there was a human link between the and itself.
The treasure discoverer.
Uh, the treasure was found in 1313, and then the the time when the good them himself revealed this is that this is very important because, uh,
we have many clues that the community texts were very rare, uh, even rench, and had difficulties to get the complete copy and later Longchamp.
It's well known that is only his disciple said a good show brought him a complete copy.
I mean, it was not something very, very easily available.
So we can suppose that even in, uh. But he didn't give them time to get a complete copy of the community.
It was not something that easy. Um, well, first objection.
So I'm making the objections to to myself so that you don't have to bother to, to do them.
His first objection is, as I was saying, that these corpora are very much overlapping.
So it's difficult to say that something is specifically from the condoning stick in the tent,
because it can already be more or less there in the morning.
So it's only a very careful theological examination that will prove it or disprove it.
Uh, and my idea generally is not. It's purely.
It's it has gone through the condo intake before arriving to the present, and that would be that.
Um, so. Um, yeah.
When he said on that. So now to generalise generalise generalise a little bit.
So the idea of the working hypothesis that we would like to propose as uh,
I mean just to try to experiment, I mean we, we are not fully convinced that it would work.
Um, it requires being tested. It could be phrased like that other and long term literature cycles or parts of cycles
that could be isolated and treated as successive rewriting of one and the same texts.
So, of course, I was very much, uh, inspired by Kathy cancelled, uh,
book on on the Aquila literatures and the editions of determining which of the magical, uh, literary.
Sorry. Uh, but if for those it's slightly maybe more difficult because it's it's, uh, it's clear that it's, um,
a family of families or, or there are sub families in families, and it's not as easy to identify as a date.
I mean, like tantric cycles, they generally work with the data.
And when the data is very similar iconography, it's very likely that the practice is also similar.
Uh, I so like when I was working on the Nehemiah cycles that there was subfamilies like for example,
Nagar Raksha is not the same as uh, uh, Yamanaka in the Haruka form, uh, as commonly found in the general term in Australia.
Literature. So the of this was inspired by a reflection on the taxonomy of the enchanter.
The, uh, what does control mean when you put the composition in a section called Permanent Office collection?
So does it only mean which is the primary meaning?
Of course, the action hot essence stemming from Padma.
Other. Incidentally, the discussion of a month ago is interesting because as for Yamanaka,
you were in the jump into that cycle and maybe Dylan could discuss also this point.
We clearly have, uh, the, the system stemming from nutrients, energy and charter systems stemming from bad medicine, for example.
So maybe that's the archetype of this duality.
Maybe this is the oldest case in which we have two very parallel, uh,
traditions of the same thing, one ascribed to understanding and one ascribed to another master.
Okay. So of course we we we we cannot suppose that the masters assume that terms are the works of their discoverers and they are not,
um, and then that they are not always there necessarily.
Then they are not always very creative writings of all the materials.
But we can suppose that they are more aware than we can be of topological affinities,
and that when they construct a category like permanent tic, it does not merely refer to an ascribed narrative or common historical origin.
Origin story that some other teachings origin artisans in the imperial period, but that they also have the feeling that these are all so to say,
various versions of one and the same teaching and not cycles that were originally independent when I said to have told them.
So now the question is. That's the image classification.
Can we use some such emic classification devices as starting points.
Sorry for the starting points for historical critical research.
Uh, I mean, the point is, can we shift from a topological approach like, suppose demanding permanently with not only, uh, sort of, um,
a class based on the assumption that these all were taught by Padma somebody,
but would also mean cycles that have content affinities or structure affinities.
And can we shift from that to a genetic, uh, approach, uh,
like placing these text in chronological series and analysing them as one and the same
text that gradually grows or shrinks or gets bent into one or another direction.
So that's just the in fact, the purpose of our presentation tonight is just to present this, uh, hypothesis for discussion.
So another group of interesting points is that the community is a corpus that was not fully finished in the very year when it was revealed,
so we know it was revealed. I mean, the Yellow Scrolls were found out by Pamela Jensen, uh, in 1313.
The murderer still dies quickly, so either 1315 or 1319.
Um, well, that's the other detail details.
So, um, let's shift that. But the point is that when he dies.
Uh, we have clues that the tech is not in its final form.
Um, there are three, uh, direct has to be managed.
Revelation one is about something dodgy, maybe.
Well, it depends on the accounts, but there is an obscure intermediary figure called Lotte intangible,
who would be a physical terror, like a treasure finding servant.
Sort of, uh, of, uh, permanent jail cell. But in some narratives, it's, uh, um, permanent.
It's told directly to wrongdoing. Dodgy. So his successor is young, topological because he dies in, uh, 1339.
I think, uh, there is also permanent. It's his most famous direct disciple, Jose Legba, the one who finally taught Longchamp.
Uh, the and forgave. And I can normalise known temp as a situation by giving him the transmission.
And plus there is also remaining path, uh,
whose posterity was pretty unknown until I suggested and quite I think solid grounds that he may have been reading good instance of Jane Master,
and thus the human link between the condoning tick and, uh, the comparison to what my, my main point is that.
Uh uh, from changing past biographies.
We understand that you got a full textual corpus only around 1321.
So then my implementation was dead already.
And then when he gets the text, I don't give you all the details, but he is then correcting, uh, the, uh, the deciphering of the dialogue.
So it means the text did not have his final version, had not read.
And then we also know from DOJ's biographies that in 1331.
So he had the text recompiled and verified before he passed the lineage to five of his disciples.
Uh, especially young people. And that's important that it's the time just before he leaves to Mongolia and not to return,
I mean, not to return for a long time in intimate and long time, but gets the text around 1339.
Well, I can justify this, these dates, but, uh, and, uh, and then he immediately sets on writing the code to a young tech,
but, uh, it's probable that he did some additions on the training itself.
Well, what we what? No, we seem to be sure of is that at least you removed his first name from the colophon.
Pretty mean, but it seems to be the case.
So my idea is, my meaning is that, uh, we are no sort of, uh, 28 years of 23, 26 years after the text was originally found.
And it just only then acquires its final form.
So I think that's a discussion that is very interesting for this, uh, treasure seminar.
I mean, it's all the I mean, beside the the concern from the other specific point I'm trying to to.
Uh, to develop here. So, uh, so we can assume that the corp has got its more or less final form only with Longchamp as editing video editing work,
which must have occurred between 1339 and 1343.
As we know, it was mostly finished when Kumar Aziz, Master Kumar died.
Of course, we don't know much how the corpus got edited again after luncheon, but there is, uh, a cheek by, uh, um, uh, the duckling bear found in it.
So it can have can have been edited again, more or less by the duckling.
But but I think, I think longevity lived it in a form that was preserved by later tradition, although I'm not absolutely sure.
So that's about the the, uh, what I call community.
Uh, and, sorry, 1984 at the.
So that's the the the the, um.
The story, the text that is witness to Turing changing version of the of the containing Dick so we can discuss it later.
And I'm just showing that this, this, this little book.
And uh, then so to to go on to go further in the story and in 1366, the then uh, 66 survey reveals a large quantity of DNA from Ensenada,
including the, the comparison, until, as we have seen, the central contains a large part of the condoning cheek in a badly rewritten form.
I mean, I'm not sure it was clear from my table of contents,
but I think if we can see the the kind of stick as being that one, I mean, the short one, the range ending by one.
So it would not be an exaggeration to say that the composite until, uh, includes sort of maybe 40%, between 40 to 60% of it.
So, uh, I mean, and then it should be, uh, uh, it should be, um, checked in to what degree?
It's, uh, rewritten or just taken a search. And plus, uh, we have a text in the community called the Young Yellow Goo.
Uh, which is a witness to the fact that the king of them was regarded as a master of the community,
although it is never said in his biographies that he received it.
So that's another, uh, hint of the fact that he was a student of origin by maybe.
Yeah. And also and Valentine found a text of his, uh, I mean, in the biographies of Gooden's disciples,
there are many cases in which he seemed to have taught them the tuning text.
That would be community. So it's interesting also because it means he really had received it.
I mean, he would not have taught it without receiving it. So my question now, and that's nearly the the conclusion of this presentation,
is would we regard that he didn't them as another editor of the community,
nearly in the same way and to the same degree and in the same sense as we regard Longchamp as being one,
uh, which is interesting because uh, and uh,
Longchamp although the condo young Longchamp scandal is regarded as a counter in mind revelation and still I mean,
we think of Longchamp as a writer, as an author, why do we don't think we don't regard them as such?
And, uh, and the part of the genetic or historical aspect of the puzzle is, of course, connected to the French handling by issue,
like whether it's in Gooding was or not a disciple of French anything, but whether it got or not from him.
Attacks of the communistic and all the transmissions of the community.
And that's the why this, this, uh, um, condoning take uh, um, not um, sorry, 1984 is so important.
So just to conclude, maybe because my original question was, uh, whether the, um, uh, the permanent section of the region would be considered as,
uh, in, you know, as something that, uh, like, uh, like, uh, containing various, like, terms that are various states of just one text, in fact.
So in fact, it does not, uh, work that well because so there is in that, uh, corpus, uh, the so-called, uh, the family justice community.
So of course, sections of Long Chain, buscando young Dick.
So these two are very homogeneous. Good, good dense person which pretty homogeneous.
Good times. Caddo brown sugar rancher is completely different reengineering best it of a teacher uh which is it's interesting because this rich ending
but I find so interesting can say one also found him so interesting that he had a young therapist completely lost at in particular.
But this seems to be also pretty different from the, um.
Uh, the basic training kick. But this would require further research.
Then journaling is often long selling, which is not unconnected.
Permalink based doctrine is surely not unconnected.
And later in more minor side cycles, from menudo, deportation to lengthening pool and scheduling.
But but these are very late things. So.
Yes, this I said already. Yeah.
For example, the engineering teacher is interesting because it's, uh, it's it claims to be young.
He cannot take for example. So this would require for further discussions.
So yeah, this I think I said most mostly internal link up guys also to be included in the in the issue,
although it's not found in the same section of the link because it's uh, it does not contain it's not purely the option thing.
It's, it's more it's one thing. Yeah.
So while that's repeating things I've already said is just I think, you know, my point is pretty clear whether it's correct or not.
So. Yeah, I think I'm done.
Okay. I hope it was of some interest to you.
And. And I hope it can at least start some avenues of research or projects for further research,
whether what I've said is was correct or not, it's really up to further research as to who decides.
Well, thank you, Stefan, for a very, very interesting, stimulating talk.