1 00:00:00,060 --> 00:00:07,790 They're not going to be an Oriel College. Constitutions before constitutional is a discussion of the Congress. 2 00:00:08,550 --> 00:00:13,230 I think that was it. No. That's up to me. 3 00:00:13,260 --> 00:00:19,559 Then we can move on to today's proceedings. We are very honoured to have Professor Anthony Page from War College give today's 4 00:00:19,560 --> 00:00:24,090 lecture entitled The Decision Point Military Command in the 21st Century. 5 00:00:24,600 --> 00:00:30,300 Professor King has written two pertinent books on related subjects from the Combat Soldier, Infantry Tactics, 6 00:00:30,510 --> 00:00:37,049 Confusion in the 2020 and 21st century, and the other on front line combat in the 21st century. 7 00:00:37,050 --> 00:00:42,300 Both of Oxford and I understand this stuff is part of an ongoing very soon to be finished book project. 8 00:00:43,680 --> 00:00:46,980 Yeah, well, the talk is called Command the 21st Century General. 9 00:00:47,300 --> 00:00:52,240 Okay. Right. And then without further ado, let me get this to work. 10 00:00:52,830 --> 00:00:56,430 Oh, yes. So before we have this going on. 11 00:00:57,330 --> 00:01:03,480 Okay. And as I said, the debriefing of. 12 00:01:13,590 --> 00:01:20,820 Okay. Thanks, Kit. Well, thanks for the for the nice introduction and thanks. 13 00:01:21,510 --> 00:01:23,860 Thanks for being here on a beautiful winter's afternoon. 14 00:01:23,860 --> 00:01:27,870 You know, in life we have preferential things to do at Oxford itself on an afternoon such as this. 15 00:01:27,870 --> 00:01:30,930 But anyway, I appreciate you. I appreciate being here. 16 00:01:31,500 --> 00:01:36,030 I got to say, I didn't talk here my first two. I had to see, first of all, also few years back. 17 00:01:36,180 --> 00:01:39,379 And the first thing to have to talk to here in this very room, 18 00:01:39,380 --> 00:01:47,400 I was actually assaulted by a fellow a fellow fellow from all the cells who attacked the military fashion. 19 00:01:47,820 --> 00:01:53,309 So I see what PTSD from my experience, but hopefully we'll have a lot of I'm getting hammered afterwards, 20 00:01:53,310 --> 00:01:57,120 but hopefully we'll have a slightly more gentle, gentle experience. 21 00:01:57,120 --> 00:01:59,519 Well, as he says, what I'm trying to do today, 22 00:01:59,520 --> 00:02:09,299 what I'm going to do today is just give you a little insight in some work I've been doing on on command in the 21st century, 23 00:02:09,300 --> 00:02:13,920 particularly what I'm working on the last few years is the issue of divisional 24 00:02:14,220 --> 00:02:18,100 command and the book that I've just hopefully we're going to like a final part. 25 00:02:18,100 --> 00:02:26,490 Please come back to and I have to keep revising it. But the book that I've just written is about divisional command in the 20th and 21st century. 26 00:02:26,730 --> 00:02:32,639 Obviously reviews trying to isolate and analyse the distinctive character of command 27 00:02:32,640 --> 00:02:38,160 at that level and then footnote about every level in the in the 21st century. 28 00:02:38,160 --> 00:02:44,370 And essentially, this this talk is really a chapter out of that book. 29 00:02:45,540 --> 00:02:52,409 And hopefully what I want to try trying to do is to choose to give you a sort of accelerated version of the 30 00:02:52,410 --> 00:02:59,970 thesis about command transformation with that on which I've been working over the last over the last four years. 31 00:03:00,660 --> 00:03:07,320 So what I'm going to do is hope to talk in quite detailed way about command and methods of of command. 32 00:03:08,970 --> 00:03:13,830 But I just need to, to, to make a few points in terms of setting, setting the talk up. 33 00:03:14,310 --> 00:03:19,950 And in particular, obviously, I need to start by defining what I mean by command. 34 00:03:19,950 --> 00:03:26,729 We command is one of those words which, you know, it's almost a word you put any meaning or you would like to put and it's adequate. 35 00:03:26,730 --> 00:03:35,610 So it's worth it's worth just confirming what I mean by command before we go into the kind of anthropological, anthropological, sociological analysis. 36 00:03:35,610 --> 00:03:38,639 And but what I mean, nothing special. 37 00:03:38,640 --> 00:03:43,580 I didn't have any technical thing to offer you in terms of a definition command of me. 38 00:03:43,590 --> 00:03:48,600 Come on. The first means decision making. I'm not trying to be clever in any way about it. 39 00:03:48,600 --> 00:03:53,400 And the concept I use in the book is not is not trying to be clever, but there is there's some, 40 00:03:53,760 --> 00:03:58,980 I think, interesting points about that once we define command decision making, 41 00:03:59,700 --> 00:04:03,540 you know, because there are also interesting organisational questions of why you have 42 00:04:03,540 --> 00:04:07,620 commanders and why you have such an institutional practice as command itself. 43 00:04:08,550 --> 00:04:15,360 At this point I think things start to get a little bit more interesting and why do military organisations have commanders? 44 00:04:15,360 --> 00:04:25,050 Why does command always exist in miniaturisation? And they all seem to be this in order to coordinate large forces, large organisations, 45 00:04:25,290 --> 00:04:34,559 it is essential for human organisations to invest decision making authority in a particular role and actually in practical terms, 46 00:04:34,560 --> 00:04:38,490 in a particular person. In other words, decision making. 47 00:04:38,970 --> 00:04:44,129 Command is decision making, but it has this important organisational element. 48 00:04:44,130 --> 00:04:48,300 The purpose of that decision making is not deciding random events. 49 00:04:48,570 --> 00:05:01,800 It's specifically a function designed to enjoin totally cohesion, to generate large scale coordination and coherence in an organisation, 50 00:05:02,820 --> 00:05:09,750 especially in an organisation where the people in it, the troops, the forces, the soldiers in it don't actually know each other. 51 00:05:09,750 --> 00:05:15,960 And what does size command is essentially a solution to an organisational problem. 52 00:05:16,170 --> 00:05:25,319 You invest decision making authority in the role in the person in order to generate large, large scale levels of cohesion and coordination. 53 00:05:25,320 --> 00:05:35,490 Now, when we get into this, this kind of debate, I think think sentence, interesting literature is interesting questions start to start to be raised. 54 00:05:35,490 --> 00:05:43,050 And there are many here. But the one I think all the work I think is particularly interesting is March analysis, famous work on garbage can thinking. 55 00:05:43,440 --> 00:05:52,090 I mean, what Martin Olson famously showed in that work was that, you know, organisations are great, you know that you put an organisation together. 56 00:05:52,120 --> 00:05:57,629 The idea of minimisation and the structure of the executive is designed to create 57 00:05:57,630 --> 00:06:03,000 rational decisions to promote and create efficiency in that organisation. 58 00:06:03,870 --> 00:06:09,180 While marching on some pretty official shows is that organisations are almost pathologically. 59 00:06:09,420 --> 00:06:13,900 Incapable of creating a decent decision and making a rational decision. 60 00:06:13,920 --> 00:06:20,040 They call this garbage can decision making and the outcome is this the chance to make a good decision? 61 00:06:20,040 --> 00:06:22,019 You need to isolate for months. 62 00:06:22,020 --> 00:06:29,970 You have your problems, your solutions, the participants who have expertise to make the judgements about the solutions. 63 00:06:30,120 --> 00:06:36,360 And then you have choice opportunities moments in time where the solution is the right one for the problem. 64 00:06:37,020 --> 00:06:43,800 That's the ideal. That's rational decision making. And one would have thought the organisations which have existed as long as humans exist, 65 00:06:43,980 --> 00:06:51,209 it would be good at this system, of this system of sequential decision making wrong what marginals and shows. 66 00:06:51,210 --> 00:07:02,610 Basically every single organisation is constantly, almost ubiquitously and universally handicapped by garbage decision making. 67 00:07:02,620 --> 00:07:07,349 Essentially, whenever it comes to decision, the sequence of problems, 68 00:07:07,350 --> 00:07:12,510 solution participants, choice opportunities gets mixed up and thrown into a garbage can. 69 00:07:12,780 --> 00:07:19,379 And you get a random decision in which there is not a sequence of problems, people, solutions, 70 00:07:19,380 --> 00:07:25,830 etc., etc., but simply random decisions, essentially for random, for random reasons. 71 00:07:25,830 --> 00:07:33,750 And you know, we're in a university now. Anyone who sat on a university appointment panel will know exactly what Marsh and Olson make. 72 00:07:33,750 --> 00:07:38,730 It's you start off with this rational process by the end, by the fourth hour of deciding who's going to get the appointment. 73 00:07:38,970 --> 00:07:42,810 We're in a totally different world of insanity and irrationality. 74 00:07:42,810 --> 00:07:50,850 And this is the world that Marsh Nelson talks about. Now, if this is a problem of civilian relations, it's even more so for military organisations. 75 00:07:51,060 --> 00:07:59,250 Yes, we invest power authority, decision making authority in the general to make decisions in order to hopefully create cohesion. 76 00:07:59,670 --> 00:08:08,940 But actually the decision making function is fundamentally compromised by garbage carrying decision making at every single moment. 77 00:08:09,210 --> 00:08:18,300 So the military, the armed forces generals have a potentially very significant problem. 78 00:08:18,300 --> 00:08:25,230 If we if we believe March Nelson we might say this in the 21st century, at the divisional level, 79 00:08:25,230 --> 00:08:35,070 at the level of the sort of basic unit of land warfare 20,000 soldiers are, the problem has become more profound. 80 00:08:35,400 --> 00:08:41,400 The problem of command has become accentuated and even more difficult, 20th century. 81 00:08:41,610 --> 00:08:44,400 Now, let me just give you a brief a brief overview here. 82 00:08:45,120 --> 00:08:50,080 If we look at divisional operations in the 20th century, they're eventually essentially very simple. 83 00:08:50,100 --> 00:08:57,930 They were conducted over extremely small fronts and with relatively small debt. 84 00:08:57,960 --> 00:09:01,860 So if you look at the First World War, so you've got centenary, but you look at the First World War, 85 00:09:02,370 --> 00:09:09,560 the average divisional front on the Western Front was a maximum of about 300 yards straightaway, 86 00:09:09,840 --> 00:09:17,280 3000 yards, a normal, lot short if we said an average of 2000 to 2500 yards, I'll be pretty accurate. 87 00:09:17,280 --> 00:09:24,419 And so the actual problem the divisional command was dealing with was a deeply critical problem. 88 00:09:24,420 --> 00:09:24,569 I mean, 89 00:09:24,570 --> 00:09:30,330 the division back divisional commander and unlucky division commander could lose entire command in an afternoon without any problems whatsoever. 90 00:09:30,480 --> 00:09:35,940 But the actual organisational problem was one bounded in time and space and function. 91 00:09:36,210 --> 00:09:37,710 For most of 21st century. 92 00:09:37,860 --> 00:09:49,559 The division has morphed into a quite different organisational type and what we see is a multiplication and stretching of its range and functions. 93 00:09:49,560 --> 00:09:52,650 And these are a couple of quotes from, from, from the work that I've been doing. 94 00:09:52,800 --> 00:10:02,100 But if we look, if we look at division operations day, what we see is an extensive I show on three or four axes. 95 00:10:02,250 --> 00:10:09,390 First of all, a range of divisional operations has increased dramatically from fronts of a few thousand yards. 96 00:10:09,630 --> 00:10:15,990 Divisional operations now are conducted over over tens and indeed potentially hundreds of miles. 97 00:10:15,990 --> 00:10:20,760 We can see that in the Iraq invasion, the divisional divisional for I'm going to say divisional fronts. 98 00:10:20,760 --> 00:10:27,989 The divisional fights were conducted over depths of 80, 90 miles during that, during that, during that. 99 00:10:27,990 --> 00:10:37,770 So at the same time, the old line division of three brigades and small territories making up 20 thousands of homogeneous soldiers, 100 00:10:37,770 --> 00:10:46,200 all essentially all army personnel, all orientated to essentially saying functions, has been replaced by heterogeneous formation, 101 00:10:46,200 --> 00:10:51,450 which is not just consist of this element of land, war, land warfare which still exists, 102 00:10:51,630 --> 00:11:01,650 but actually it's been overlaid with a series of other assets and functions and obviously airpower, aviation, UAV, drones, forced air above that. 103 00:11:01,650 --> 00:11:08,490 So the division has grown from a small information functional a little front to this large extended. 104 00:11:09,760 --> 00:11:14,050 Which actually reaches up to about 2025, 25,000 foot. 105 00:11:14,320 --> 00:11:24,360 And at the same time, there's new domains of of air of of operation which have become critical to division operations, namely informational debate, 106 00:11:24,400 --> 00:11:26,320 cyber electronic domains, 107 00:11:26,530 --> 00:11:35,320 and also critically political and civil engagement has been become utterly critical to the division as a as a system of of of operating. 108 00:11:35,350 --> 00:11:42,370 So what we see with the division is the actual the the division is organisation, the character of division operations. 109 00:11:42,370 --> 00:11:47,600 And therefore the problem of divisional command has has actually changed. 110 00:11:47,630 --> 00:11:54,820 If I wish to summarise this in a sense, I say this this 20th century divisional command was a problem of scale. 111 00:11:55,120 --> 00:12:01,720 It was a problem of organising homogenous force over a small area for mass industrial warfare. 112 00:12:01,960 --> 00:12:06,220 21st Century. The problem of division of command is one of scope. 113 00:12:06,460 --> 00:12:14,680 It is the coordination of a heterogeneity of assets over large spans of time and space. 114 00:12:14,860 --> 00:12:21,759 In other words, the problem which command has been created is the solution or is trying to be creative. 115 00:12:21,760 --> 00:12:25,030 Solution has become much more complex. So what is what M Division has done? 116 00:12:25,030 --> 00:12:33,310 What a Western division has tried to do over the last 20, 25 years, especially since the millennium, especially since 2001, 2003. 117 00:12:33,910 --> 00:12:38,350 What are they sought to do? Well, the thesis of the Book of Just Hope, which is finished, 118 00:12:38,590 --> 00:12:46,479 is that in response to this increasing complexity of operations and essentially an individualised system, 119 00:12:46,480 --> 00:12:50,799 an individualised regime of command which characterised mass industrial warfare, 120 00:12:50,800 --> 00:12:58,450 the divisional level has been superseded, increasingly superseded by professionalised collective model of command, 121 00:12:58,450 --> 00:13:02,860 in which the individual division alone is still is absolutely critical. 122 00:13:03,340 --> 00:13:13,450 But the individual divisional command is now part of a command team, executive team, where the decision making authority, 123 00:13:13,690 --> 00:13:21,040 not responsibility, but authority is actually distributed across a team of subordinate deputy commanders. 124 00:13:21,280 --> 00:13:24,220 And in fact, staff in the headquarters as well. 125 00:13:25,000 --> 00:13:32,739 Essentially, virtual security individuals have been replaced by highly professional teams of decision makers. 126 00:13:32,740 --> 00:13:36,820 And that's what I essentially want to talk about. And that what I want to give you a insight. 127 00:13:36,940 --> 00:13:44,259 Insight into this is world of the collective command is by just looking at one example, namely the example of of the decision point, 128 00:13:44,260 --> 00:13:53,410 which is a small, apparently mundane and insignificant artefact which has been adopted in the divisional headquarters. 129 00:13:53,560 --> 00:14:00,380 And I would suggest you become a really important element of contemporary 21st century command decision making, 130 00:14:00,400 --> 00:14:08,980 particularly a means of actually coordinating and executing decisions within these emergent command collectives. 131 00:14:09,010 --> 00:14:16,600 Now, for the that what I'm going to do now is just go into all the sort of empirical material which I've been working on, 132 00:14:16,600 --> 00:14:22,870 hopefully, hopefully working totally, you know, stuff like is pretty boring actually, but hopefully it won't be totally tedious. 133 00:14:22,870 --> 00:14:29,199 But let me just make one qualification that every, every time I'm going to solve this, the same question comes up. 134 00:14:29,200 --> 00:14:38,830 And it's a very good question. And the decision point is for a particular kind of decision making, what I call normal or routine decision making. 135 00:14:39,280 --> 00:14:45,250 So what I'm going to talk about the rest of the talk is not crisis decision making, critical decision making under pressure, 136 00:14:45,430 --> 00:14:51,310 but regionalised decision making essentially when the plans are going according to plan. 137 00:14:51,320 --> 00:14:54,040 And I'm happy to talk about what happens in a crisis. 138 00:14:54,040 --> 00:15:01,300 But the decision point is really for regionalised normal decision making in normalised situations. 139 00:15:01,480 --> 00:15:07,540 Okay. And what is the decision point? Well, at this point, again, it's it's not to be different on some decision point is exactly what it says. 140 00:15:07,810 --> 00:15:17,700 It is a moment in the future I projected or anticipated moment in the future when a commander is going to have to make a decision, 141 00:15:17,750 --> 00:15:26,889 is likely to have to make a decision. And the decision point refers to a to the anticipation of that future decision. 142 00:15:26,890 --> 00:15:30,880 And as I to show, it's become an important element. The staff work at the divisional level. 143 00:15:30,890 --> 00:15:35,590 Now this is the research project as a whole and I'm not I'm happy to talk about any of this in question. 144 00:15:35,590 --> 00:15:38,950 But what I'm actually going to talk about today is hit down here, 145 00:15:39,160 --> 00:15:49,880 sets up my work with three UK division and then second a little bit of first Marines and at a little bit 101st Airborne. 146 00:15:49,900 --> 00:15:53,690 So it's this is what this is what I'm going to talk to you today. 147 00:15:53,710 --> 00:15:56,320 Now, I think looking around this this audience, 148 00:15:56,320 --> 00:16:05,010 I know this some colleagues from justice movement within the Navy with the S and a couple other friends who are very familiar with this world. 149 00:16:05,040 --> 00:16:08,980 But what what I want to try and talk to here the world. 150 00:16:09,380 --> 00:16:14,270 I'm trying to enter the life of which I'm trying to describe here is is this is the lifeboat. 151 00:16:14,270 --> 00:16:17,810 It's the lifeworld of the divisional headquarters. 152 00:16:18,560 --> 00:16:26,690 And this is, you know, 82nd Airborne divisional tactical command post set up in Fort Bragg a few years ago. 153 00:16:26,690 --> 00:16:33,140 But essentially all divisional headquarters have different from but they typically assume a form like this, 154 00:16:33,290 --> 00:16:37,520 a load of tents very highly connect with digital communication. 155 00:16:37,700 --> 00:16:45,290 And this space in them that I'm particularly interested in is these spaces called the current operations centre or war room situation. 156 00:16:45,460 --> 00:16:51,710 Call it what you will, but this is the kind of hub of the divisional headquarters where current operations, 157 00:16:51,950 --> 00:17:00,439 the battle is actually fought in real time with reference to real time computer screens, 158 00:17:00,440 --> 00:17:07,310 digital eyes, situation maps and real time electronic communications from various echelons of command, 159 00:17:07,940 --> 00:17:11,930 giving information to the divisional headquarters about current operations. 160 00:17:12,080 --> 00:17:18,230 And it is in this environment the current operations centre where command decisions are made, 161 00:17:18,620 --> 00:17:22,310 and it's here by this staff and the commanders with them, 162 00:17:22,550 --> 00:17:29,870 that the decision point as a bureaucratic artefact is utilised and comes to inform decision making. 163 00:17:29,870 --> 00:17:35,449 So everything I try to say in the next half an hour or so is related to this world of 164 00:17:35,450 --> 00:17:39,560 the of the divisional headquarters and particularly to its current operations centre. 165 00:17:40,550 --> 00:17:44,300 Okay. So what I'm wondering for a little bit, and this is, you know, 166 00:17:45,680 --> 00:17:55,159 it's very descriptive what I'm about to do in order in order to understand the decision point and its significance for contemporary decision making, 167 00:17:55,160 --> 00:18:02,570 I just have to take a little sort of tribute tree, a descriptive tribute of tell you how staff actually creates a plan. 168 00:18:02,720 --> 00:18:09,320 And so if you just forgive me for 10 minutes, I'm just gonna go read through how staff makes a plan. 169 00:18:10,070 --> 00:18:13,040 Because it's only then that you understand where the decision point comes from. 170 00:18:13,040 --> 00:18:19,040 And then we can actually start to analytically, you know, I can show you what the decision point is doing now. 171 00:18:19,220 --> 00:18:23,210 What is the plan start? Well, I'll cut I'll make a little bit of information here, 172 00:18:23,670 --> 00:18:30,620 but a plan starts with commands and tell a commander these days write an intent statement, you know, 173 00:18:30,620 --> 00:18:36,529 we should be sending you guys your mission statement, which is a which is a statement, a descriptive statement, 174 00:18:36,530 --> 00:18:43,580 a narrative of what the command wants to happen when and where in a particular operation. 175 00:18:44,090 --> 00:18:48,050 And this is this is the doctrinal thing. Let me just give you a quick example of this. 176 00:18:48,260 --> 00:18:53,120 So this is as far as I know, you will know, this is Asbjorn, 177 00:18:53,510 --> 00:19:06,200 one of a diagram showing up because currently the UK in the US use Azerbaijan as their basic sort of scenario for contemporary exercise. 178 00:19:06,230 --> 00:19:11,270 We don't know. All the data in from our squadron is actually accurate data. 179 00:19:11,390 --> 00:19:16,100 Now three UK division on which some have been following this request was based, 180 00:19:16,100 --> 00:19:23,000 has been spending quite a lot of time this mission over the last three years during recurrent exercise and the exercise is essentially started. 181 00:19:24,080 --> 00:19:31,820 They started here three division in the first exercise in 2015, 2014 attacked up here and a nasty enemy that had come from, 182 00:19:32,660 --> 00:19:36,320 well, a country that was all media but had been recorded, an area or something. 183 00:19:36,980 --> 00:19:42,170 And in the next operation, in the next exercise, what happened is that the three UK division, 184 00:19:42,170 --> 00:19:47,690 having successfully defeated the enemy here, ended up investing this city of major here. 185 00:19:47,690 --> 00:19:56,820 And the exercise that the key no divisional exercise in 2015 exercise RS of 50 involved and so on message. 186 00:19:56,910 --> 00:20:01,580 I mean not real or fictional. It didn't actually happen, but a fictional, so on. 187 00:20:01,880 --> 00:20:13,580 You take an industrial hydroelectric powered city and centre in this area of of of of Azerbaijan and 188 00:20:13,580 --> 00:20:18,680 the the whole exercise involved the invest investment of this city and then an attack into the city. 189 00:20:18,680 --> 00:20:19,639 Now, why do I give you this? 190 00:20:19,640 --> 00:20:27,960 DEJA Because what was interesting in terms of extracting out of this decision point has you can see the very clear development, 191 00:20:28,010 --> 00:20:36,830 the extraction of decision point. Now, this was the divisional commander's intent for exit the launch on Resolve 15, 192 00:20:38,480 --> 00:20:45,320 referring to the operation of the exercise of fighting in this city and defeating the enemy. 193 00:20:45,320 --> 00:20:48,220 In that now what you'll see here, you don't need to read the whole thing by any stage. 194 00:20:48,260 --> 00:20:55,730 All I've done what the statement talks about essentially is about the defeat, the isolation defeat of the enemy brigade in the city. 195 00:20:57,020 --> 00:21:06,020 The important point for us is this the as you'll see here, the command's intent consists of a series of effects. 196 00:21:06,020 --> 00:21:14,300 Woods was in effect. It's back here at a. That will affect refers to the outcome that a commander wants. 197 00:21:14,570 --> 00:21:20,510 What is an intent and intent really is a list of facts that a commander wants. 198 00:21:21,050 --> 00:21:29,300 In other words, in the intent, the commander lists the outcomes and brackets the effect that that commander wants in the operation in order to, 199 00:21:29,300 --> 00:21:32,570 quote, communicate that to his staff and his subordinates. 200 00:21:32,600 --> 00:21:39,919 You'll see here those two main effects are outcomes they want to offset to the enemy and involved various other other things that have to happen. 201 00:21:39,920 --> 00:21:43,580 All the effects, all the outcomes, all the tasks that have to be achieved to do that. 202 00:21:43,730 --> 00:21:48,350 Now what then happens? Well, the mission statement is very important. 203 00:21:48,710 --> 00:21:54,080 The commander's extended mission statements are very important moment in the in the planning process. 204 00:21:54,080 --> 00:22:00,170 But the staff then take the mission statement and start to actually deconstruct. 205 00:22:00,350 --> 00:22:05,690 And this is when things start to become interesting and when the decision point starts to be extracted. 206 00:22:05,870 --> 00:22:12,079 Basically, the staff take the mission statement and they isolate all those effects words. 207 00:22:12,080 --> 00:22:21,170 You've seen all those outcomes the general wants, and they simply put the effects down on a map of the operating area. 208 00:22:21,350 --> 00:22:24,530 And so you can say, we want to do it any way. 209 00:22:24,530 --> 00:22:25,780 I'm going off time, but you'll see. 210 00:22:25,790 --> 00:22:33,829 So if we look at Vanity Fair, you will see that all of the effects that the commander want are in a box and ops box around an operations box, 211 00:22:33,830 --> 00:22:38,770 around military coerce, compel, isolate, and then obviously defeat in the some other ones here. 212 00:22:38,780 --> 00:22:46,370 So the staff take the mission to take the commands inside and they disaggregated into a load of effects 213 00:22:46,370 --> 00:22:54,110 which they actually put down on the map and work out where certain outcomes are going to have to happen now. 214 00:22:54,620 --> 00:23:03,710 It then becomes even more interesting for you because you then move to a stage where from this map the decision support matrix is called. 215 00:23:04,040 --> 00:23:14,550 They then develop a the set of decision points which triangulate structure the subsequent operational plan. 216 00:23:14,660 --> 00:23:18,650 What then happens? Well, they check the map on the staff. 217 00:23:18,890 --> 00:23:29,030 If one of the cells begins to produce a sync matrix, a synchronisation matrix of the entire operation, synchronisation, which is nothing clever. 218 00:23:29,270 --> 00:23:39,640 It is typically I would excel sheet to spreadsheet or would excel which the staffs do two things on the x axis of the chart. 219 00:23:39,660 --> 00:23:50,569 They put the days and the times running along and then on the y axis they list every single formation, every single unit, 220 00:23:50,570 --> 00:23:59,090 every single element of which the divisional operation consists the organic divisional assets and assigned attached divisional assets. 221 00:23:59,330 --> 00:24:02,210 And they put it out down the left hand axes. 222 00:24:02,570 --> 00:24:13,070 And then they have the fascinating job of putting in all the tasks that every single unit is going to have to do over the whole operation. 223 00:24:13,280 --> 00:24:21,050 So what you end up with is a sink matrix with hundreds and actually sometimes potentially thousands 224 00:24:21,170 --> 00:24:29,150 of tasks of actions which are designated to particular units and assigned to particular times. 225 00:24:29,360 --> 00:24:34,230 And if you go into divisional headquarters, the segments is pretty produced, 226 00:24:34,390 --> 00:24:39,170 it's on a computer but is then always printed up wherever you have divisional course sources always been printed out, 227 00:24:39,170 --> 00:24:49,720 and what you end up with is a sink matrix that's about a metre and a half wide and runs from about that great pillar here to about this signpost here. 228 00:24:49,730 --> 00:24:56,090 And it's a pen, you know, it's actually appended to the wall of the current operations centre and actually to other cells as well. 229 00:24:57,170 --> 00:25:08,180 It is a bewildering and intimidating document which, you know, you need a microscope to read at most times, but it disaggregated the entire operation. 230 00:25:08,390 --> 00:25:17,629 Now, once the staff has the Sync Matrix, they then produce decision points and they locate decision points on to the Sync Matrix. 231 00:25:17,630 --> 00:25:26,240 And you can see this is actually this is a sort of simplified signal from exercise arm resolve 15 232 00:25:26,420 --> 00:25:34,640 with just the actual decision points marks on it that were on the same matrix in that exercise. 233 00:25:34,670 --> 00:25:42,740 Now, how did it how does this got started? Just simple stuff go through the same matrix and there's a thousand tasks, hundreds of tasks. 234 00:25:43,760 --> 00:25:50,989 But if you think about operation, the certain tasks that are really critical, you know, so one is attacking, you know, what is attacking an enemy. 235 00:25:50,990 --> 00:25:57,830 And then on the other side, the bridge, when you go to take the bridge first in terms of the operational minutiae, 236 00:25:57,830 --> 00:26:00,890 there were some really decisive elements that had to happen, 237 00:26:01,400 --> 00:26:08,950 very decisive tasks that had to be achieved if the operation investment, the city, you know, the attack in the city was going to be able to. 238 00:26:09,560 --> 00:26:14,960 You know, various logistics things had to be sorted out. Humanitarian camps had to be sold, etc., etc. 239 00:26:15,380 --> 00:26:21,320 But it came to a point where obviously there's one critical task where there's going to come a point at some point in 240 00:26:21,320 --> 00:26:27,650 the future where the division is going to have to actually make the decision to launch the assault into the city, 241 00:26:27,680 --> 00:26:30,409 defeat the enemy brigade in that city. 242 00:26:30,410 --> 00:26:38,180 And no, I'm reasonably the staff decided they'd like they identified a series of other actually five preceding decision points. 243 00:26:38,510 --> 00:26:42,770 Then they got to this moment of launching the attack and they recognise that in my view, 244 00:26:42,770 --> 00:26:48,169 absolutely rightly this was a decision for the general was going to have to make a decision of 245 00:26:48,170 --> 00:26:53,120 whether to actually launch the decisive phase of the operation in which large numbers of civilians, 246 00:26:53,400 --> 00:26:56,570 large number enemy and large of his own troops could be killed. 247 00:26:56,630 --> 00:27:01,880 So absolutely the decision to launch the attack was a decision point. 248 00:27:01,880 --> 00:27:10,510 It required a decision point. It required decision a permission from the general to actually launch this attack and they located it. 249 00:27:10,800 --> 00:27:17,000 Decision point on this on this on this on the safe matrix where, you know, 250 00:27:17,000 --> 00:27:22,340 on the things about halfway along down the call on that day there's actually a point now I want 251 00:27:22,340 --> 00:27:26,990 ethnographic be incorrect that this yellow there was three three different ways used see other ones. 252 00:27:27,260 --> 00:27:33,230 I mean I don't know if that's doctrine but it was know the correct decision point what then happens. 253 00:27:33,410 --> 00:27:39,280 Even more interesting my view the decision point. No it's when the decision is going to have to be made or likely made. 254 00:27:39,560 --> 00:27:42,740 The staff then go one step further and they go right. 255 00:27:43,730 --> 00:27:51,650 What are the decision? What are the criteria? What are the factors which inform a sensible piece of decision making at that point? 256 00:27:51,860 --> 00:27:59,030 And they produce a decision criteria table which actually lists what they regard as 257 00:27:59,030 --> 00:28:05,530 the decisive factors which would justify a decision to launch an attack into Japan. 258 00:28:05,720 --> 00:28:11,330 And this was the decision criteria table that three div used on this exercise. 259 00:28:11,540 --> 00:28:14,209 And you'll know we'd have to go with this through this in any detail. 260 00:28:14,210 --> 00:28:21,500 But what they effectively did is they had essentially they essentially identified three basic conditions that pertain to the decision. 261 00:28:21,710 --> 00:28:26,840 What was the state of the enemy force? Basically, was the enemy force weak enough? 262 00:28:26,840 --> 00:28:31,040 Had it been treated far off that an attack was sensible? 263 00:28:31,400 --> 00:28:35,350 Was there was the you know, there was was there a humanitarian crisis? 264 00:28:35,360 --> 00:28:39,589 In other words, what three you didn't want to be doing is rolling tanks down a road and there's 265 00:28:39,590 --> 00:28:43,850 a thousand refugees coming towards and they crushed on their train tracks. 266 00:28:43,850 --> 00:28:47,750 That would be a very bad situation. So the humanitarian situation was another factor. 267 00:28:47,960 --> 00:28:52,460 And the five or so factors related to friendly force reinforce that to be in position, 268 00:28:52,850 --> 00:28:56,959 sufficient combat effectiveness to make a sensible decision for general to launch so well. 269 00:28:56,960 --> 00:29:02,660 The start is they broke down the decision of launching into a series of criteria 270 00:29:02,870 --> 00:29:09,140 and then they had an assessment of whether those criteria were actually met. 271 00:29:09,170 --> 00:29:14,149 Now the diagram they used this part was really complicated because what it should all be is you go green, 272 00:29:14,150 --> 00:29:18,110 green, green, green, and then you go to this general conditions of green. 273 00:29:18,110 --> 00:29:23,749 We recommend you launch the attack. But actually the way they set up the conditions was very complicated. 274 00:29:23,750 --> 00:29:31,469 So then they had some roads that it was. We will continue to questions, but they realise that it was too complicated. 275 00:29:31,470 --> 00:29:35,060 So the following year when they went on a major exercise. 276 00:29:35,420 --> 00:29:38,780 Actually two years later when the MEMORISING exercises in the US last year, 277 00:29:39,410 --> 00:29:45,050 they changed the way they did the decision criteria tactical instead of a complicated conditional table. 278 00:29:45,290 --> 00:29:49,690 They just simply had a series of questions, simple, affirmative questions. 279 00:29:49,940 --> 00:29:53,000 Yeah. All the enemy are treated to the level we require. 280 00:29:53,210 --> 00:29:58,040 Yes. No. And essentially what the idea was, it had these ten questions. 281 00:29:58,700 --> 00:30:03,679 Every single one would be answered. Yes, you would get the general in your column on the right hand side. 282 00:30:03,680 --> 00:30:08,420 Right. We reached page six B decision criteria have been met. 283 00:30:08,570 --> 00:30:13,550 We have, yes. On every single decision criteria. General, we are asking you for a decision. 284 00:30:13,910 --> 00:30:23,840 Our recommendation is you launched the attack. So what we see is the decision criteria actually simplified the decision not just to link back to God. 285 00:30:23,840 --> 00:30:30,050 Which kind of thinking? Of course, the idea here is that you basically front end be front load you analytical work. 286 00:30:30,200 --> 00:30:33,230 So when you're actually in the whole operation and things are going wrong, 287 00:30:33,650 --> 00:30:38,870 you don't have to start doing the deep work cogitation working out criteria on the basis of which your decision should be made. 288 00:30:39,020 --> 00:30:46,099 It's already been done and the decision is absolutely a binary decision of go, no go, because it's already it's already been done. 289 00:30:46,100 --> 00:30:56,959 Now, just to say, look, you may say, oh, this is all nonsense and a fragment of, you know, figment of exercise, imagination, but actually reality. 290 00:30:56,960 --> 00:31:01,570 When, when, when, when you on operations this kind of complexity never works in decision points 291 00:31:02,240 --> 00:31:07,480 the come around actually if we look at the evidence from Iraq particularly 292 00:31:07,490 --> 00:31:11,330 because of manoeuvre warfare certainly from the counter-insurgency campaigns 293 00:31:11,540 --> 00:31:16,729 actually divisions use these techniques of decision making on actual operations. 294 00:31:16,730 --> 00:31:20,690 And I just point you to David Petraeus experience, the 101st Airborne. 295 00:31:20,870 --> 00:31:27,420 Now, that's pretty tall. Let me let me try and give you a quick analysis of what I think is going on here, 296 00:31:27,460 --> 00:31:33,650 why I think this is an example of collective command, of a distribution of command authority. 297 00:31:33,740 --> 00:31:41,660 So let's let's see what the you know, let me let me TRUMP before knowing what I think decision decision points do are the seems to be 298 00:31:41,720 --> 00:31:52,160 four basic functions that are decision point and specially decision criteria for orientation, 299 00:31:52,880 --> 00:31:58,640 delegation acceleration and accuracy can get the right one for the last one. 300 00:31:58,640 --> 00:32:04,620 But but before focus of anticipation, how do they help anticipation with the staff. 301 00:32:04,620 --> 00:32:05,389 Well, what is. 302 00:32:05,390 --> 00:32:15,709 Yes is this the current operation centre is a very busy working environment on the staff, you know, working 24 hours a day in this centre, 303 00:32:15,710 --> 00:32:25,790 running the current battle which involves, as I suggested to you, an extraordinary multiplicity of actions extended over time in space. 304 00:32:26,450 --> 00:32:32,840 It's very complicated to maintain cohesion and coordination within the headquarters, 305 00:32:33,230 --> 00:32:38,330 and it's very difficult for the staff, you know, as they work in their specialist area, 306 00:32:38,330 --> 00:32:48,320 but also try and coordinate with each other to ensure that the current operation is actually according with the plan and what the scope. 307 00:32:48,350 --> 00:32:52,610 Therefore, the staff in the current operations have developed a technique basically to try and 308 00:32:52,610 --> 00:32:58,429 ensure that they are linked to the plan in terms of in terms of its coordination. 309 00:32:58,430 --> 00:33:03,799 Essentially, as the battle is running on in the current operations from this staff and 310 00:33:03,800 --> 00:33:08,360 especially the chief of the operations room is essentially constantly referring 311 00:33:08,540 --> 00:33:19,849 to the sink matrix on the wall and in particular referring to the decision points and indeed specifically normally to the next decision points. 312 00:33:19,850 --> 00:33:27,679 So the staff actually, you know, in their discussions verbally, are constantly referencing decision points. 313 00:33:27,680 --> 00:33:29,170 And of course, the next decision point, 314 00:33:29,180 --> 00:33:38,509 all of us that consciously sort of collectively orientated to where the operation has to go in the immediate future from where it is now. 315 00:33:38,510 --> 00:33:46,730 So as the there's some chaos going on here, the staff collectively are still thinking forward to the next decision points, in other words. 316 00:33:47,060 --> 00:33:51,580 And in fact, I saw a very comical version of this. So they went on, say this three day, 317 00:33:51,580 --> 00:33:55,129 if we're doing a really tough exercise and America last year war fighter and they were 318 00:33:55,130 --> 00:34:00,110 approaching river line one of the deepings was to be cross the river to attack the enemy. 319 00:34:00,110 --> 00:34:04,340 The major object was on the other side of the river and Odyssey hours. 320 00:34:05,240 --> 00:34:11,450 The exercise opened up in the morning, 7:00 in the morning after seven three did no longer be completely destroyed. 321 00:34:11,810 --> 00:34:16,340 About 4 hours later, about 11:00, the staff was still going on about DP 12, 322 00:34:16,490 --> 00:34:19,610 which was the DP for the command to make a decision about crossing the river. 323 00:34:20,060 --> 00:34:24,080 There was no forces to cross the river. They were open, destroyed hours before. 324 00:34:24,200 --> 00:34:28,550 So the DP is a way of. The staff to coordinate forward. 325 00:34:28,800 --> 00:34:35,870 And what it allows him to do is to essentially slightly be creative and to necessary 326 00:34:35,870 --> 00:34:41,480 balance the operation and make innovations and adaptations as events occur, 327 00:34:41,660 --> 00:34:51,110 but still maintain maintain the line on it now. That's an important function, but we then get into the real element of command and decision making, 328 00:34:51,110 --> 00:34:59,540 and that anticipatory staff is the way the staff ensure that they're still aligned so that they can help help the commander. 329 00:34:59,540 --> 00:35:08,540 But then we move into other areas. And one of the key things here is the decision point allows a divisional headquarters to delegate authority. 330 00:35:08,780 --> 00:35:12,769 So initially, you know, a division operation starts. There's huge complexities. 331 00:35:12,770 --> 00:35:17,180 There's always unforeseen events. There's always some kind of disaster or crisis going on. 332 00:35:17,600 --> 00:35:25,010 The problem is, once you've invested command in in the person of a particular individual like the divisional general, 333 00:35:25,970 --> 00:35:31,940 it is important that the authority of the general is aligned to the correct place. 334 00:35:32,150 --> 00:35:36,110 The general has very limited amount of time to make decisions. 335 00:35:36,130 --> 00:35:42,020 The the pressure on a contemporary divisional commander is, is, is, is prodigious. 336 00:35:42,170 --> 00:35:46,610 And they have very limited amounts of time, energy, space, 337 00:35:46,610 --> 00:35:54,770 emotional bandwidth to actually make decisions into and to have to have to bear the responsibility of actually making things so. 338 00:35:55,010 --> 00:36:00,919 The key point, one of the key points in terms of of of running a divisional operation and maintaining 339 00:36:00,920 --> 00:36:06,620 cohesion is ensuring that decisions are aligned to the right fit of command. 340 00:36:06,620 --> 00:36:11,000 And this is just one example from the exercise if something of something small happens. 341 00:36:11,240 --> 00:36:18,170 You do not want your division of command being sucked into an irrelevant tactical decision when actually in 6 hours time, 342 00:36:18,380 --> 00:36:22,310 they're going to have to coordinate and make a very serious decision about the operation. 343 00:36:22,320 --> 00:36:28,969 So what the decision points do and their criteria is to assign rigorously assign 344 00:36:28,970 --> 00:36:36,140 and discipline command decisions to particular and appropriate command echelons. 345 00:36:36,140 --> 00:36:42,110 And I don't trust very useful about this. You know, it actually was something quite interesting. 346 00:36:42,470 --> 00:36:47,360 Namely, once the decision criteria have been signed off by the commander and the commanders. 347 00:36:47,360 --> 00:36:53,150 Great. You know, once they've got a GPS on that box is essentially, why do you need me? 348 00:36:53,900 --> 00:36:57,740 I made this decision six weeks ago. I'm not actually now required. 349 00:36:57,740 --> 00:37:06,350 And what actually allows is a genuine devolution of decision making authority to actually potentially quite junior levels. 350 00:37:06,350 --> 00:37:12,530 Yeah, sure. Deputy commanders often make decisions for a commanding general. 351 00:37:12,770 --> 00:37:16,190 Actually, under the system of decision criteria, 352 00:37:16,370 --> 00:37:24,559 there are frequent cases where a current operations centre on the chief of the current operations centre, who will be a lieutenant colonel, 353 00:37:24,560 --> 00:37:30,620 colonel actually makes divisional command decisions because the criteria have been fulfilled 354 00:37:30,620 --> 00:37:36,530 and the he that he or she has been temporarily empowered to make that decision at that point. 355 00:37:36,770 --> 00:37:42,620 Now, a couple last points about decision make. What what what else does the decision point to? 356 00:37:42,710 --> 00:37:50,540 Well, once you've got the criteria in place and you establish when the decision points off conditions on which they're going to be executed, 357 00:37:51,020 --> 00:37:56,959 basically in some sense when the actual action happens, no serious decision has to be made. 358 00:37:56,960 --> 00:38:00,950 The decision to be put to a decision has essentially been automated, 359 00:38:01,780 --> 00:38:09,679 that once the criteria have been mapped, the decision is automatic and can be instantly executed. 360 00:38:09,680 --> 00:38:13,069 And what you know, this is an example from First Marine Division, 361 00:38:13,070 --> 00:38:19,390 but it's a it's a piece of evidence replicated many times in the research that essentially 362 00:38:19,400 --> 00:38:26,690 decision points or short short circuits the requirement for decision making in the action. 363 00:38:26,900 --> 00:38:33,950 If we go back to the military example, when they actually got to a point where the advice to the city and the conditions were met, 364 00:38:34,220 --> 00:38:42,530 essentially the decision the decision was was was kind of made by three division, a division of command. 365 00:38:42,530 --> 00:38:45,859 But actually it was it was almost automatic the conditions to be met. 366 00:38:45,860 --> 00:38:51,169 And it simply completely accelerated that process of consultation and discussion and communication. 367 00:38:51,170 --> 00:38:55,440 Officer Downes decision was taken almost automatically. 368 00:38:55,700 --> 00:39:01,080 Finally, the final element of this, which I think potentially is it this is the most, you know, 369 00:39:01,130 --> 00:39:07,130 most interesting topic is the accuracy of decision point here is that what are 370 00:39:07,170 --> 00:39:13,670 decision criteria are charging decision criteria by isolating the key factors, 371 00:39:13,670 --> 00:39:20,329 the conditions under which any sensible condition would be made and isolate those factors 372 00:39:20,330 --> 00:39:26,930 before the pressure of decision making comes up is is brought to bear on command of the star. 373 00:39:27,000 --> 00:39:34,290 Of the insurers. It's meant to, you know, certainly mitigates the risk of a catalyst kind of thing, 374 00:39:34,350 --> 00:39:39,270 but it's actually meant to ensure that the decision making is accurate and appropriate. 375 00:39:39,270 --> 00:39:42,640 In other words, it tries to refine the decision making. 376 00:39:42,660 --> 00:39:50,530 Let me just give you a quick example. This an example of Petraeus time to try us again to try electronics blindness. 377 00:39:50,740 --> 00:39:59,500 This example, let me just talk this through this what he's referring to here, he's totally talking through the 101st Airborne Airborne divisions. 378 00:39:59,580 --> 00:40:07,200 So in Iraq in 2003 and basically which involved a series of very large air operations, 379 00:40:07,200 --> 00:40:12,150 it was a very serious large series, split series, whether, you know, two things sort of. 380 00:40:12,540 --> 00:40:15,059 Yes, I think sort of the problems are huge. 381 00:40:15,060 --> 00:40:23,400 And the air invasion lifts, you know, over 400 helicopters move the entire division 200 miles off land in a desert, and then they do it again. 382 00:40:23,400 --> 00:40:28,440 And that's effectively 101st Airborne dead during the six weeks of the of the operation. 383 00:40:28,440 --> 00:40:35,759 Now very complicated activity but what what was in discussions with General Petraeus was interesting 384 00:40:35,760 --> 00:40:41,850 is how how this very complicated process gets broken down into quite simple procedures. 385 00:40:41,850 --> 00:40:45,149 Now what he was saying, fault is not so set up. It's no good. 386 00:40:45,150 --> 00:40:51,900 What's a fault? Fault, this forward air refuelling point, essentially erroneous operations look absolutely great. 387 00:40:52,290 --> 00:40:55,980 Yeah, but actually they just relied and they need a lot of fuel. 388 00:40:56,070 --> 00:41:03,300 You just need a load of petrol. Otherwise they otherwise the helicopters just turn to pumps, battle on the desert or on the desert floor. 389 00:41:03,420 --> 00:41:11,670 So essentially the whole of the 101st Airborne, this extraordinary kind of swarm of bees that would lift off and then move forward to under bombs, 390 00:41:11,910 --> 00:41:24,690 which rely on really boring stuff, namely huge bladders of aviation fuel that would be driven forward into the desert to form these false fuel, 391 00:41:24,780 --> 00:41:27,479 fuel forward air refuelling points. 392 00:41:27,480 --> 00:41:34,430 And they'd have ball by round protection for settlements columns to get to get everything, some communications systems get everything ready. 393 00:41:34,590 --> 00:41:43,650 And the point here is what progress process. Look here you all the division of cars, this unbelievable machine, you know, 394 00:41:43,790 --> 00:41:50,670 100,000 of them, an incredible machine, a three dimensional entity, war making machine up. 395 00:41:51,250 --> 00:41:57,000 And the divisional decision comes back to simple this or if the fuel wasn't there if there's a fault not set, 396 00:41:57,000 --> 00:42:00,990 there's no fuel station stuck in the desert. There's not widdop. 397 00:42:01,140 --> 00:42:05,700 I have no idea. Brilliant, General. Obviously I have no decision to make now. 398 00:42:05,910 --> 00:42:11,639 So if the thoughts not say it's no good, I just. I just let's just contemplate, in other words, know what's happening here. 399 00:42:11,640 --> 00:42:15,959 But the of this is a very simple example where you have one condition. 400 00:42:15,960 --> 00:42:20,070 Is the fault set? Yes. Go. No, don't go. 401 00:42:20,280 --> 00:42:23,550 But you can actually just disagree. It's the staff has to consider a few other things. 402 00:42:23,790 --> 00:42:27,629 Is the fuel in the plant is enough? Is a column communications there? 403 00:42:27,630 --> 00:42:32,360 Is there a protection force there? So there's three couple of subordinate things the staff to it. 404 00:42:32,550 --> 00:42:36,660 Once the staff actually worked out, the fault is set, not what's happening. 405 00:42:36,660 --> 00:42:46,260 Here you go. General patrols, you know. Yeah, certainly the most famous one of the finest generals of the of this generation. 406 00:42:46,260 --> 00:42:53,790 And he's reduced basically to being a disciple, his staff, who tell him whether the criteria set for his fuel, 407 00:42:53,790 --> 00:42:57,929 you know, his petrol stations, his free will, air refuelling points in the desert, 408 00:42:57,930 --> 00:43:05,370 that effectively his decision making is he's leached out appropriate and colonised by 409 00:43:05,370 --> 00:43:11,279 the staff through the method of the decision point in especially centuries criteria. 410 00:43:11,280 --> 00:43:18,000 In other words, the staff begin to against all doctrine through the system of the decision point, 411 00:43:18,010 --> 00:43:21,330 through the decision system of the decision criteria, 412 00:43:21,570 --> 00:43:29,639 the staff actually begin de facto to take, you know, an element of jurisdiction over decision making. 413 00:43:29,640 --> 00:43:36,030 They actually start to structure and limit the decisions that a commander can take. 414 00:43:36,570 --> 00:43:43,620 What's the point? The point here is that, look, in a highly complicated organisation like 21st Century Division, 415 00:43:44,040 --> 00:43:50,099 the management of operations has become so complicated that it's no longer adequate 416 00:43:50,100 --> 00:43:55,709 to invest monopolising authority and a single commander who can heroically go, 417 00:43:55,710 --> 00:43:58,450 right, we're going to go left line. KING All right, fine. 418 00:43:58,470 --> 00:44:07,980 KING You actually have a whole three dimensional system that needs to be orientated and worked and to be managed and coordinated. 419 00:44:08,580 --> 00:44:19,230 And so the decision making cannot be one of individual instinct has to be predigested prior to an anticipated systems of decision making. 420 00:44:19,320 --> 00:44:26,910 So what are essentially arguing with a disparate decision point is this is that what we see is a really Monday this is. 421 00:44:27,150 --> 00:44:35,490 It's really, you know, trivial artefacts of the divisional divisional headquarters of division operations in the 21st century. 422 00:44:35,760 --> 00:44:45,120 But implications for command, I would suggest you're really profound that what it denotes is a systematised and professional means of sharing and 423 00:44:45,120 --> 00:44:53,940 distributing the authority for decision making with a view to actually improving decision making on operations. 424 00:44:53,970 --> 00:44:58,049 Now, let me just finish one last point. Is this joining the military? 425 00:44:58,050 --> 00:44:59,250 Do this in the 21st century? 426 00:44:59,250 --> 00:45:10,350 Is this a unique military practice of distributing decision making among a collective into a highly collectivised and highly professional body? 427 00:45:10,380 --> 00:45:14,850 I'll say, no, it's not at all. We can support it across all the professions very clearly. 428 00:45:14,850 --> 00:45:21,360 And a point to you, to Gawande's book, The Checklist Manifesto, which I mean, it's got I mean, of course, The Checklist Manifesto. 429 00:45:21,390 --> 00:45:26,040 I mean, I think it's interesting. It's got two interesting pages. And then the rest of it is whatever, you know. 430 00:45:26,040 --> 00:45:31,199 But the two interesting papers are good. They are really good pages because I mean, you know, no, no, no, no disrespect. 431 00:45:31,200 --> 00:45:37,020 But they all put pages. What does he say? Look, this is really interesting talking about himself as consultant. 432 00:45:37,290 --> 00:45:41,100 He's talking about surgery. And you get the optimistic bit here. 433 00:45:41,110 --> 00:45:46,200 Yeah. But generals do operations in theatres, surgeons do operations in theatres. 434 00:45:46,200 --> 00:45:49,350 But, you know, so there's an opportunistic bit here. But but no. 435 00:45:49,580 --> 00:45:57,450 What do you say? Basically, it's look look up surgical practice in the post-war era, up to about the 1970s, 1980s. 436 00:45:57,690 --> 00:46:00,690 Basically, the procedures are pretty simple and normal. 437 00:46:00,690 --> 00:46:03,780 If it's anything complicated, the patient dies, unfortunately. 438 00:46:04,380 --> 00:46:09,450 So what happens in from the 1980s? Well, procedures become really complicated. 439 00:46:09,750 --> 00:46:14,580 And you can't have a single heroic surgeon digging around in your brain. 440 00:46:14,760 --> 00:46:21,239 You need team of specialists who coalesce and you see a specialist on a series 441 00:46:21,240 --> 00:46:25,760 of different functions to ensure that your brain actually is working after all. 442 00:46:26,070 --> 00:46:33,360 Right. What has become critical to coordinating operate this surgical team is the checklist, 443 00:46:33,510 --> 00:46:38,910 a series of procedures which the team actually just simply checks off. 444 00:46:39,270 --> 00:46:44,460 So what I suggest is we see in the in the in surgical procedure, 445 00:46:44,670 --> 00:46:52,980 something which is akin to transformations in the military to conclude and to confirm everything I said essentially. 446 00:46:53,250 --> 00:46:57,810 And they of increasingly complex and heterogeneous operations. 447 00:46:58,650 --> 00:47:08,400 The military especially, but not only at the divisional level, have sought to address the multiplication of decisions, the extension of decisions, 448 00:47:08,400 --> 00:47:19,020 the elongation of decision cycles by replacing an individually empowered commander, a heroic commander with a highly professional, his team. 449 00:47:19,260 --> 00:47:22,560 And the decision point is one. 450 00:47:22,950 --> 00:47:31,620 And but one method by which this collective process of decision making has been institutionalised within the armed forces. 451 00:47:31,800 --> 00:47:44,060 Thanks so much. Some questions that he just indicates a million people at once about. 452 00:47:46,380 --> 00:47:52,290 John, thank you very much with your array of interviews. 453 00:47:53,070 --> 00:47:58,210 Did anybody reflect on where this spacecraft from on this planet is going over this? 454 00:47:58,950 --> 00:48:03,870 Oh, yeah. I mean, the it was the interview was a very basic really. 455 00:48:04,060 --> 00:48:08,750 It was it was it was really great. The interviews are really interesting and solitary. 456 00:48:08,790 --> 00:48:18,240 So absolutely most of generals or many of the generals I spoke to were very forceful that I was completely wrong. 457 00:48:19,500 --> 00:48:25,379 And so so when I started the project was was conducted on the ninth called Post the post-Iraq General. 458 00:48:25,380 --> 00:48:30,720 That's what the grant was. And when I talked to sort of David Petraeus and actually James Mattis was the funniest. 459 00:48:30,720 --> 00:48:34,590 I mean, James Mattis was a formidable character. 460 00:48:34,770 --> 00:48:41,880 And in the most, you know, in the in the you know, he in the most polite is but also deeply threatening sort of way. 461 00:48:42,630 --> 00:48:45,120 He basically said, I was talking absolute nonsense. 462 00:48:45,120 --> 00:48:55,320 And the command and the command post Nazi command flat were utterly as relevant as the contemporary, as the as as they were. 463 00:48:55,860 --> 00:49:00,299 And so so I had to think about what I was trying to say and what it says. 464 00:49:00,300 --> 00:49:04,260 This command has three function. 465 00:49:04,290 --> 00:49:08,100 The three elements command, mission definition, mission management, leadership. 466 00:49:08,550 --> 00:49:14,790 And what I continued not to talk to people like Petraeus, Mattis, etc., etc. was that we were talking about different. 467 00:49:14,790 --> 00:49:23,820 When we talking about personality and the extraordinary ethical responsibility of the commander, we were confusing two different functions. 468 00:49:24,120 --> 00:49:29,159 They talked about mission definition and they are absolutely wrong in terms of mission definition. 469 00:49:29,160 --> 00:49:33,420 The responsibility for setting the mission and embodying the mission. 470 00:49:34,410 --> 00:49:36,770 The commander is as important as that. 471 00:49:37,110 --> 00:49:44,880 I would have to say more than this is 24th, because the division operations have morphed up to a kind of operational, even strategic level. 472 00:49:45,210 --> 00:49:53,850 The divisional come on now has way more latitude in terms of setting the mission and actually bears much more responsibility, 473 00:49:53,850 --> 00:49:58,589 which spans across both political and military. You know, it's a political and military responsibility. 474 00:49:58,590 --> 00:50:05,280 So in that to make the commander is much more much more responsive on this point. 475 00:50:05,820 --> 00:50:14,550 Issues of personal flair, you know, personal vision or I think extremely important. 476 00:50:15,060 --> 00:50:18,740 And indeed, the thing about Mattis, which is really interesting, is that Mattis set his own. 477 00:50:18,750 --> 00:50:23,969 He has set his own division's mission for Iraq. He now he didn't get a mission from CENTCOM. 478 00:50:23,970 --> 00:50:27,750 He's quite interesting about the CENTCOM commander of Tommy Franks. 479 00:50:27,750 --> 00:50:32,159 You know, not entirely complimentary, but so absolutely. 480 00:50:32,160 --> 00:50:42,660 There's you know, there's still a great importance for the capabilities, the intuition, the personality of the commander of that kind of level. 481 00:50:43,290 --> 00:50:52,019 But what I would say is that what you see is this the expand the distribution, the Collectivisation command is at the management level. 482 00:50:52,020 --> 00:50:55,200 Once the command is set, the what the mission is, 483 00:50:55,470 --> 00:51:03,180 then there has to be a distribution of authority downwards because the mission has expanded so widely. 484 00:51:03,180 --> 00:51:04,589 And so to emphasise. 485 00:51:04,590 --> 00:51:14,540 Yeah, what I would say is yeah there is absolutely a place for command is flat, but it's, it's, it's located at different functions. 486 00:51:14,550 --> 00:51:22,280 I mean mass is great him because if you look at Mattis was interesting so he both he and all his staff officers that I interviewed said oh, 487 00:51:22,290 --> 00:51:27,810 you're totally crazy. You've never met Mattis. He's a completely dominating, domineering character. 488 00:51:28,110 --> 00:51:37,409 And then the next sentence, they say, Yeah, but Mass is also really brilliant at distributing commands and and being a practitioner of mission, 489 00:51:37,410 --> 00:51:41,250 command and distribution of, of command authority. So you went, why was this so tight? 490 00:51:41,250 --> 00:51:47,069 Paris I could see that was going is like, you know, some kind of Napoleonic figure, you know, Alexandrian figure. 491 00:51:47,070 --> 00:51:51,570 And then this guy is brilliant description I want to say is the it's it's the different functions. 492 00:51:52,320 --> 00:51:57,420 So yeah, there is there is absolute yes. And so that intuition when I'm talking about crisis, 493 00:51:57,420 --> 00:52:02,520 but obviously that intuition and that personal connection with staff officers and commanders 494 00:52:03,090 --> 00:52:08,730 becomes very important when you hit a crisis which transcends the moment of the decision. 495 00:52:08,940 --> 00:52:14,610 So, yeah, I it's what you're saying is I completely agree with you and there's lots of evidence for it. 496 00:52:14,970 --> 00:52:22,010 Yeah. I might just be trying to draw out the crisis examples in which maybe I shouldn't. 497 00:52:22,010 --> 00:52:28,490 But it seems like your discussion of the disaggregation of decision making fit right in with mission command. 498 00:52:28,640 --> 00:52:33,610 That seems like people were pretty well, but then the checklist model seems 100% counter to that. 499 00:52:33,620 --> 00:52:41,610 And so, you know, I'm trying to think about things where let's say the same matrix in advance says and decision point you know options every. 500 00:52:41,630 --> 00:52:44,950 Yeah but then facts on the ground are such that the best thing to do is see. Yeah. 501 00:52:44,990 --> 00:52:48,470 Is that part of the crisis category or is there a place for that? 502 00:52:48,530 --> 00:52:56,120 Well, it's very interesting. You said I mean, in terms of the work that I've done, I would put that down to crises on the. 503 00:52:59,890 --> 00:53:03,220 Yeah. There's a slight. Yeah, there's a slight grave. 504 00:53:03,250 --> 00:53:07,930 What were you saying that you say up to that point everything's going well and that actually there might be a better way of doing it? 505 00:53:08,010 --> 00:53:13,749 Yeah, but I would probably still put that under a series of crisis thinking, 506 00:53:13,750 --> 00:53:18,940 i.e. the the series of tasks that need to be executed, not in anticipating the plan. 507 00:53:19,240 --> 00:53:24,940 And so huge burden is put on the current operations to make a quick response. 508 00:53:25,120 --> 00:53:31,770 Coordinating a quick sort of operation mission, essentially on an ad hoc on the hoof basis, 509 00:53:31,790 --> 00:53:39,350 I probably would say even if it was going well, that that corresponds to to to a crisis situation. 510 00:53:39,370 --> 00:53:47,840 And what I'd say there is that the critical thinking, um, uh, you know, responding to a crisis situation is the, 511 00:53:48,070 --> 00:53:55,479 is the skill of the operation from, in, in, in being able to coordinate horizontally with themselves. 512 00:53:55,480 --> 00:54:04,420 They pulled out the assets and still fulfil the operational requirements overall. 513 00:54:04,470 --> 00:54:08,860 So what's interesting about in the crisis that although physically in a crisis, 514 00:54:08,860 --> 00:54:14,919 the sync matrix becomes less relevant like that staff stuff so busy they're not looking at the steel. 515 00:54:14,920 --> 00:54:18,310 Actually, especially the chief of conversations is still thinking. 516 00:54:18,910 --> 00:54:25,750 We actually still need to get to that point so low does this all suspension of disbelief for babes there is actually still no rotation. 517 00:54:25,850 --> 00:54:29,679 Now your other point about checklist. Yeah, you know what? 518 00:54:29,680 --> 00:54:40,420 We you know, a checklist is a is a simple I agree so checklist that the Q&A is talking about is is a simpler is a simpler process. 519 00:54:40,810 --> 00:54:47,709 Um, but I mean, it just seemed, you know, I mean, it was maybe is opportunistic, but it just seemed a useful thing to, 520 00:54:47,710 --> 00:54:52,960 to, to, to try and put it, I mean, like, say one point about, you know, the sort of the option thing. 521 00:54:52,960 --> 00:54:59,740 I mean, I, you know, you'll see sounds like America and the Americans trying to make decision point system 522 00:54:59,740 --> 00:55:04,000 more flexible to talking about technical decision point tactics and decision more taxes. 523 00:55:04,000 --> 00:55:12,610 Though for every decision point you create, you then put the staff to work and staff basically creates a series of options for the come on. 524 00:55:12,610 --> 00:55:16,059 So you actually get an encyclopaedia sort of repertoire of potential options. 525 00:55:16,060 --> 00:55:22,959 And for every decision point, there should be at least three, you know, branch plans, namely everything's going to plan. 526 00:55:22,960 --> 00:55:25,960 So we'll stick to the plan. Everything's going quite better than the. 527 00:55:26,290 --> 00:55:32,409 So we we need to we need a catastrophic success plan, but we also have a catastrophic failure plan. 528 00:55:32,410 --> 00:55:42,800 So what you end up with instead of one lineal plan with with white markers of decision points you get by CISO power, 529 00:55:42,820 --> 00:55:46,840 it's like a delta, you know, you get the power of the operation goes down here. 530 00:55:47,200 --> 00:55:53,230 There's a Delta decision point here and then you go like that. And then and that's what they're experimenting with. 531 00:55:53,530 --> 00:55:57,670 So so it's I would suggest it's moving quite a long way. 532 00:55:57,850 --> 00:56:08,050 Even within the decision point system, the Western forces led by the US are beginning to move some way from a sort of go Indian. 533 00:56:08,890 --> 00:56:13,490 Right. Make sure we haven't left any swamps inside this guy's head sort of scenario, you know. 534 00:56:13,510 --> 00:56:16,540 So yeah. But it's a very good it's a very good point. Thanks. Yeah. 535 00:56:17,170 --> 00:56:23,260 General in the course a defeat as there was a bit of inevitability about the collective 536 00:56:23,260 --> 00:56:30,639 commands coming from the effects base doctrine that the hopes of Western militaries document. 537 00:56:30,640 --> 00:56:36,910 Because if you as the commander just want you to this, which was the US, we would have joined in a set of orders anyway. 538 00:56:37,270 --> 00:56:43,020 But now it just increase the facts and you say I want to defeat or destroy him. 539 00:56:43,840 --> 00:56:49,420 That's very helpful. I suspect he was going to say that because things that be destroyed, but without saying how, 540 00:56:49,630 --> 00:56:56,210 then that's actually by investigating control and necessarily devote resources goes yeah you that work 541 00:56:56,230 --> 00:57:02,800 up a couple of code and say one or two guys I know we used to be limited to the call to say okay 1.6. 542 00:57:03,010 --> 00:57:06,790 There have been a couple of a bit of code to give me with me in half an hour. 543 00:57:06,940 --> 00:57:11,880 Yeah. And then it also work out there's compliance with 71 levels as well. 544 00:57:11,920 --> 00:57:15,100 So it's a very it naturally fluid. 545 00:57:15,390 --> 00:57:18,430 It's it's a very it's a very interesting point. 546 00:57:20,680 --> 00:57:24,520 I mean, it's a complicated point. 547 00:57:24,820 --> 00:57:28,900 So, you know, let me give you sort of a half answer, which is this. 548 00:57:29,950 --> 00:57:37,870 What I would say is that, yeah, I think that the way so say let's think where space operations came from. 549 00:57:37,870 --> 00:57:44,889 You know, it's from the from base the air forces as munitions become more precise and they get a sweep of different things such as bombing, 550 00:57:44,890 --> 00:57:47,920 you know, doing the aerial bombing, accurate area bombing, which is. Right. 551 00:57:47,920 --> 00:57:53,350 All right. I would love that. That's pretty accurate of the end of the position where they've got a suite of munitions. 552 00:57:53,350 --> 00:57:58,390 So this is 1992, sweep munitions, accurate musicians and measure ignitions that do different things. 553 00:57:58,680 --> 00:58:03,360 And so the original solo effects based Doctor Who effects base operations, 554 00:58:03,360 --> 00:58:07,870 most action was was against any kind of devolution of control because the control, 555 00:58:07,910 --> 00:58:14,190 the centralised and centralised headquarters, you could actually define precisely the mission that should be used now. 556 00:58:15,210 --> 00:58:24,210 You know, use the word naturally has expand I think of as wide a military as the Army and Marine Corps is have taken on the word facts. 557 00:58:24,480 --> 00:58:26,040 I think you were absolutely wrong. 558 00:58:26,070 --> 00:58:36,629 I think that within it has been used to institutionalised the devolution of what I would call managerial responsibility, 559 00:58:36,630 --> 00:58:40,670 i.e. the call to set the parameters of the operation. 560 00:58:40,680 --> 00:58:45,820 The mission has been defined within that mission. That's de facto, I want you to create. 561 00:58:45,840 --> 00:58:49,500 That's the outcome I want you to create. Don't go away. 562 00:58:49,620 --> 00:58:54,569 I do it in any way you want. So I think you're actually right. But note also, this may be more of a British thing. 563 00:58:54,570 --> 00:59:00,990 So if you talk to Americans, Americans go say Americans will go, bloody [INAUDIBLE], you know, the British these effects every way it works. 564 00:59:01,000 --> 00:59:06,180 If you look at 82nd Airborne, when they talk about the fact they're basically in the task an action, 565 00:59:06,390 --> 00:59:16,680 it's much more rigorous and they actually quite interested by the British sort of this much more loose sort of conceptual definition, of course. 566 00:59:16,680 --> 00:59:19,840 And for that it's a different it's different coordinate, which is yeah, 567 00:59:19,860 --> 00:59:27,540 actually the Americans got the weaponry to actually create the effect in real time in space where the British do this sort of legend to man, 568 00:59:27,540 --> 00:59:28,829 we've got we've done this fact. 569 00:59:28,830 --> 00:59:37,889 But that that's a cynical point but yeah so you know but the American the contrast in the American concept, in fact with the British, 570 00:59:37,890 --> 00:59:44,670 what I think does kind of provide evidence for your argument that in Britain 571 00:59:45,060 --> 00:59:51,120 it has been a way of institutionalising a devolution of managerial authority, 572 00:59:52,290 --> 00:59:59,639 but in different organisations. I'll just give an example. The Air Force 80 seconds, 80 seconds definitely is used to devolve, but, you know, 573 00:59:59,640 --> 01:00:03,660 command subordinate commands are you will take that airfield, you will take that building. 574 01:00:03,870 --> 01:00:08,850 The fact I want is that building destroyed, not my wanting to secure the airfield, 575 01:00:08,970 --> 01:00:13,410 you know, as I, you know, in a sort of broad, gentlemanly way the British generals do. 576 01:00:13,410 --> 01:00:18,990 Yeah, but it's a very, very interesting, complicated point by the fact here. 577 01:00:20,280 --> 01:00:26,519 Course, I'm not going to completely agree with say you are doing better than last time. 578 01:00:26,520 --> 01:00:30,660 I mean, by this time last year, it was very difficult. 579 01:00:30,940 --> 01:00:37,200 Now, look, I of course, I agree that you need something to wrestle down complexity, get order out of chaos, 580 01:00:37,620 --> 01:00:45,990 something to anticipate, uh, pre analysis, very worthy devolution management saying all of those things you can't argue against. 581 01:00:46,470 --> 01:00:53,250 But I think that what this has appeared from is our recent experience where we've been fighting counter-insurgency, 582 01:00:53,250 --> 01:00:58,410 counterterrorism, where we've had overwhelming superiority, we've not been fighting general war. 583 01:00:58,920 --> 01:01:04,470 And very often divisions have been fighting independently and not within a core army group structure. 584 01:01:04,800 --> 01:01:13,470 Whether that would ever come back again. And I think the end result is madness because I think Maitlis of course has a position in that, 585 01:01:13,470 --> 01:01:20,250 but it's beginning to mechanised command and if you mechanised command, it means inadequate generals could actually do reasonably well. 586 01:01:20,250 --> 01:01:26,340 And that's the last thing you want. You want the general to be running the show, not the stop you running the general. 587 01:01:27,150 --> 01:01:30,959 And I think it's over optimising an imperfect world. 588 01:01:30,960 --> 01:01:37,920 I mean, would you think matrixes have helped the Americans when they were retreating down the Korean Peninsula 589 01:01:37,920 --> 01:01:43,860 with the southern attack of the of the Chinese completely obliterating everything that was before? 590 01:01:44,120 --> 01:01:47,710 I mean, that required generalship to sort of produce something out of that. 591 01:01:48,130 --> 01:01:54,750 And but most importantly, I think this whole process begins to isolate the general from his command job. 592 01:01:55,170 --> 01:02:01,379 His job is to do all this and to say and to read the map, to read the situation, 593 01:02:01,380 --> 01:02:08,640 try anticipate and then give the ground of all the work out to his own people to get on, do the detail, 594 01:02:09,090 --> 01:02:14,640 not for them to do all the the pre thinking of this because that's taking away his job 595 01:02:15,000 --> 01:02:19,080 and put it up on some matrix which then get some authority which he doesn't deserve. 596 01:02:19,680 --> 01:02:28,670 So I, I think I agree with what Mattis did when he went to Joint Forces Command, where it was, and said IDO and the rest of it, we don't agree with. 597 01:02:30,360 --> 01:02:35,280 I come back with one point there is that. One final point is, is what you're saying new? 598 01:02:35,280 --> 01:02:41,280 And to a certain extent it isn't because I mean, Eisenhower must have had this command board when he was doing D-Day. 599 01:02:41,850 --> 01:02:47,310 He couldn't have done it himself. So he he established areas where he gave things to other people to do. 600 01:02:47,550 --> 01:02:52,050 I know that was the army that but I mean, good generals have always done that. 601 01:02:52,440 --> 01:02:58,470 And Rupert Smith, in particular in the first Gulf War identifies five one star. 602 01:02:58,620 --> 01:03:02,730 Points of command. I dedicated the whole show to the artillery. 603 01:03:02,770 --> 01:03:08,670 Logistically, I and he trusted those people and he ran a command ball system, if you like. 604 01:03:08,970 --> 01:03:14,130 But he retained complete authority himself, so it may be in its best form. 605 01:03:15,030 --> 01:03:25,710 It's always been like that. On the other side, of course, the the poor old Egyptian general who sat in his bunker when in the old poor war, 606 01:03:25,740 --> 01:03:35,690 having a perfect plan with a gigantic sink matrix, no doubt was overwhelmed by the lightning strikes by the Israelis. 607 01:03:35,700 --> 01:03:42,870 He just couldn't keep up with it. And so that illustrated more than anything where you get a sort of mechanisation of war coming in. 608 01:03:43,290 --> 01:03:51,150 But I had a great privilege yesterday to sit next to an American at lunch who'd been a tank company commander in Fallujah. 609 01:03:52,020 --> 01:03:56,100 And he said, I mean, this is his words from yesterday. It was very relevant today. 610 01:03:56,310 --> 01:04:00,180 He said, we were given brilliant orders. We tell you exactly what to do. 611 01:04:00,600 --> 01:04:05,700 We went into the town and it all went wrong. It didn't follow what we would have to do at all. 612 01:04:05,790 --> 01:04:12,149 And so the pre cooking of the situation, which perhaps we'd become used to because we have overwhelming superiority, 613 01:04:12,150 --> 01:04:15,570 is not what's going to happen in the future. Thanks. I mean, thanks. 614 01:04:15,780 --> 01:04:22,110 Very, very kind and perceptive intervention and a lot of a lot of points there, 615 01:04:22,560 --> 01:04:28,750 most of which obviously in this context, I'm I'd love to have more of a chat chat with you on this. 616 01:04:28,770 --> 01:04:34,800 There's definitely this the street two or three reasons. One is the historical thing is this is this new? 617 01:04:36,270 --> 01:04:43,050 And then you're saying, okay, this shouldn't this shouldn't be happening and wouldn't be happening if it wasn't for the coin. 618 01:04:43,230 --> 01:04:47,610 And this is a quote from US Marines officer. It wasn't for coin poisoning. 619 01:04:49,650 --> 01:04:53,460 Yeah. So she should focus on those of this sort of supporting the rebels. 620 01:04:53,820 --> 01:04:56,690 So historically, yeah, 621 01:04:56,910 --> 01:05:02,990 this is something that you got me right there because that is something that been keep me awake at night for a quite a few years and months. 622 01:05:03,000 --> 01:05:13,430 I know I am. I just was describing a current system situation which has a completely commensurate equivalent in the 20th century. 623 01:05:13,440 --> 01:05:19,169 Now, you know, the project deliberately is looking at the 20th century to 21st century, 624 01:05:19,170 --> 01:05:24,569 trying to claw what I think is a transformation, not a revolution, but a transformation. 625 01:05:24,570 --> 01:05:28,890 And what I'd say is, look, let me ask you about the divisional level first, 626 01:05:28,980 --> 01:05:32,219 and then I'll make that point that you said about Eisenhower divisional level. 627 01:05:32,220 --> 01:05:44,940 Look what I got to say to you. So I did work on both counterinsurgency division, soldier operations and warfare operations. 628 01:05:44,940 --> 01:05:51,510 And what I'd say is, look, all the evidence I looked and I looked at the first Marine Division in Chosin, 629 01:05:51,930 --> 01:05:56,730 all the evidence there is the division operation is very simple. I divisional commander, 630 01:05:57,870 --> 01:06:07,320 basically monopolised mission definition and actually mission management as well because the divisions were so this experience was so contiguous, 631 01:06:07,680 --> 01:06:12,360 the division can't actually be on site in the divisional defence. 632 01:06:12,420 --> 01:06:17,129 I don't actually see what his subordinate commanders and troops were doing. 633 01:06:17,130 --> 01:06:21,000 So what do we get from the period 1914 to 1992? 634 01:06:21,540 --> 01:06:25,769 You get to a commander monopolising mission definition was very simple and 635 01:06:25,770 --> 01:06:30,959 actually monopolising most of the decision for decisions in management with very, 636 01:06:30,960 --> 01:06:41,820 very small staffs. Smith Staff in, in, in, in the Gulf was 150, but it stretches off 1944 Western Division. 637 01:06:41,820 --> 01:06:48,510 So it was 40 people. It was tiny times too often commanders used to even use a smaller group. 638 01:06:48,690 --> 01:06:52,409 So the very, very small set of decisions. 639 01:06:52,410 --> 01:07:02,040 So now let's saying if we were going to say a merged collective command, I think you had Montgomery's you really saw an interesting example, 640 01:07:02,040 --> 01:07:07,620 I think, in when he was division commander of third division in the Battle of France. 641 01:07:07,830 --> 01:07:15,900 Actually, something that to me was as close to a collective command system that you get in the 21st century, 642 01:07:16,020 --> 01:07:25,590 in the 20th century, namely, he he he taught his brigade commanders to execute series of trials when you ordered them to do it. 643 01:07:26,130 --> 01:07:29,690 So it was as close as that you could get. But there's this of command commands. 644 01:07:29,700 --> 01:07:36,870 You didn't do that who just took over themselves or in fact, the division disaggregated into these individual finds. 645 01:07:37,950 --> 01:07:43,139 But what it's just is that, you know, what we're talking about here is a transformation, not a revolution. 646 01:07:43,140 --> 01:07:48,090 So there's continuities in procedures, continuities in certain practices. 647 01:07:48,090 --> 01:07:58,290 But the the transformation seems to me the evidence is, you know, pointing that, you know, something has changed in the practice squad, but it is not. 648 01:07:58,510 --> 01:08:06,660 Same, even though in some examples you can see something that presages something that will be thoroughly institutionalised in the 21st century. 649 01:08:06,670 --> 01:08:14,010 But but not this as well. If Montgomery created a small come on collective said it was year five people. 650 01:08:14,490 --> 01:08:18,899 What we're talking about here is five people with a a division that was operating 651 01:08:18,900 --> 01:08:22,690 on very small fronts through a series of manoeuvres forward and then back. 652 01:08:22,860 --> 01:08:33,960 Well, you're talking about the 21st century as these these heterogeneous forces operation across domains and second point manoeuvres coin. 653 01:08:34,140 --> 01:08:41,160 Yeah, I take your point. I'm definitely collective command as most show in terms of counter-insurgency 654 01:08:41,160 --> 01:08:45,540 operations where there's a there's a ridiculous multiplication of functions. 655 01:08:45,540 --> 01:08:50,310 You end up fixing the electrics and the water as division commander and Petraeus did in Mosul. 656 01:08:50,550 --> 01:08:52,310 And then you have to disaggregate out. 657 01:08:52,500 --> 01:08:59,729 But if you look at the key example we've got in the case, of course, the direction of Iraq and the subsequent exercises, 658 01:08:59,730 --> 01:09:04,410 which are all warfighting exercises, you know, they're all deliberately designed for fighting. 659 01:09:05,490 --> 01:09:16,379 I mean, look, I'm open to more evidence, but the evidence that I collected suggests strongly to me that there had been a evolution 660 01:09:16,380 --> 01:09:25,530 transformation in the way that decision making was operationalised at the divisional level. 661 01:09:25,540 --> 01:09:29,100 And let me say this in terms of what does it mean by other stuff? 662 01:09:30,030 --> 01:09:36,030 Well, I think that, you know, even if you go up to the highest levels of command, 20th century, you still get a simplified military. 663 01:09:36,030 --> 01:09:40,319 You know, you don't start to get political elements and you get to the very, very top level. 664 01:09:40,320 --> 01:09:45,120 So where it's just it's just as your scepticism is completely well-founded. 665 01:09:45,900 --> 01:09:52,530 I totally agree with your scepticism, but I'm I'm happy to hear some evidence that disproves what I'm trying to say. 666 01:09:52,530 --> 01:09:57,629 But I've got to say, I mean, I didn't have a universal sample, but I thought a pretty reasonable sample. 667 01:09:57,630 --> 01:10:00,870 And I, I think something has happened. I think something has happened. 668 01:10:01,380 --> 01:10:11,360 All right. We have 2 minutes and three questions left, so please come back to the U.S. six and the gentleman in the front row and then the red. 669 01:10:14,950 --> 01:10:17,590 I spoke to some of my grandparents. And you go through a whole program. 670 01:10:18,220 --> 01:10:24,640 Know I'm finding it a little difficult to reconcile your excessive focus on structures, 671 01:10:24,700 --> 01:10:35,020 processes, team of team concepts and that kind of environment and the the gut general, 672 01:10:35,920 --> 01:10:46,360 the general with flair, the general which relies on experience and knowledge of decades of knowledge based leadership, 673 01:10:46,900 --> 01:10:52,780 where does that all sort of fuse into your hypothesis? 674 01:10:53,200 --> 01:10:59,400 So we're talking together. Yeah, that's right. Two words missing pertinent from some of the question is what is trust? 675 01:10:59,410 --> 01:11:07,240 And the other one we find with trust. In the case of if if you are a good command and you trust your support, you allow them to get along. 676 01:11:07,540 --> 01:11:11,800 I think trust has been eroded by the rate at which some things happen in the senior command. 677 01:11:12,340 --> 01:11:16,060 The second one is family. I'm sure I'm happy with the best way to keep a marriage on that. 678 01:11:16,510 --> 01:11:25,090 I think matrix in whatever form to meet through the whole pie is way, way, way, way, way, way, way too big for divisional headquarters. 679 01:11:25,330 --> 01:11:29,889 It should be when you put on screen. My point being, the cause that Andrew fought is pretty much fingers. 680 01:11:29,890 --> 01:11:38,000 It's too many pies. And that's actually they're not trusting of of us to get it quote within the boundaries of what you give voice. 681 01:11:38,100 --> 01:11:42,060 And let me just say this. Um, no experience is absolutely critical. 682 01:11:42,080 --> 01:11:46,600 I mean, the answer to this question, you know, in one word is matters that matters. 683 01:11:47,100 --> 01:11:51,520 It was evident, you know, the evidence is he was the best division commander. 684 01:11:51,520 --> 01:11:56,170 He is the best commander who has existed in the West in this current generation. 685 01:11:57,370 --> 01:12:04,060 How did you come on? Well, he drew on his extraordinary expertise and knowledge and extensive reading. 686 01:12:04,240 --> 01:12:10,570 He used his incredible, charismatic personality to engender trust in his subordinates and his staff. 687 01:12:10,960 --> 01:12:17,680 But when it actually came to the mechanics of driving first Marine Division 300 miles to Baghdad, 688 01:12:17,920 --> 01:12:24,819 he actually needed a really good current operations centre and a really good set of subordinates who 689 01:12:24,820 --> 01:12:30,580 had prepared and practised the operation time and time again and rehearsed with concept drills, 690 01:12:31,150 --> 01:12:36,010 which whose purpose was explicitly to pre-empt, 691 01:12:36,010 --> 01:12:42,730 presage and anticipate the decisions that Mattis himself and his subordinates commanders would have to take. 692 01:12:42,760 --> 01:12:50,740 So if we check my sources, the classic example, what this doesn't say, oh, the general was just a cipher, right? 693 01:12:50,860 --> 01:12:56,290 This political one is it isn't. The authority and skill goes from the command to the staff. 694 01:12:56,500 --> 01:13:05,200 It is it is collective command, the expertise of the entire collective commander, 695 01:13:05,500 --> 01:13:12,909 deputy commanding generals, subordinate brigade commanders and the staff all become critical to operations. 696 01:13:12,910 --> 01:13:21,100 And what I tried to give these days. One strand of that new system, one element, one artefact, 697 01:13:21,100 --> 01:13:29,500 which is used along with loads of other techniques to tie this extraordinary new organisation together. 698 01:13:30,100 --> 01:13:32,710 To emphasise the human dimension is critical, 699 01:13:32,950 --> 01:13:41,500 is augmented by bureaucratic administrative techniques of the type that we've seen today in order to generate high levels of trust, 700 01:13:41,530 --> 01:13:48,330 not to eliminate trust and turn everything into an algorithm which which then runs in a 701 01:13:48,740 --> 01:13:53,620 in a sort of normal fashion when we know that war is a domain of uncertainty and fear. 702 01:13:53,980 --> 01:13:58,690 So so no space. No space for instinctive decision making. 703 01:13:59,620 --> 01:14:02,920 Yeah. Everything I said about processes yet of course there is space for discipline. 704 01:14:02,930 --> 01:14:08,440 But in order to make an instinctive decision on a contemporary operation, you have to work really hard to be able to do this. 705 01:14:08,440 --> 01:14:11,970 Division Commander Brief Response. Oh, well, yeah. 706 01:14:11,980 --> 01:14:18,220 You know, I mean, the trust. Yes. Is critical. I mean, I'm sort of kind of putting both together and I mean, 707 01:14:18,310 --> 01:14:27,490 what I say is evidentially you may not like the by the provisional staff of lots of people down are working the left by are they using matrix 708 01:14:27,490 --> 01:14:35,139 but the fact is the evidence shows they work with them and they use them and they're professional enough to actually make them work themselves. 709 01:14:35,140 --> 01:14:38,590 So, you know, that's that's what I mean. 710 01:14:38,620 --> 01:14:41,810 So since, you know, as a scientist, that's what's actually happening. 711 01:14:43,390 --> 01:14:47,750 You know, we might not want it to happen, but that's actually what's happening right now. 712 01:14:47,800 --> 01:15:15,520 Thank you so much for coming. Please join me. Production, which was originally supposed to take place.