1 00:00:00,430 --> 00:00:16,150 I think it's sort of like. 2 00:00:16,150 --> 00:00:21,490 Welcome, everybody, I'm Simon Jackman, outlets across the university with the spice sector, 3 00:00:21,490 --> 00:00:27,520 and I'm very pleased to introduce and say the head of our physics department and 4 00:00:27,520 --> 00:00:32,260 Phil Diamond is going to say a few words of welcome and then we'll get on on. 5 00:00:32,260 --> 00:00:38,160 Find out about the aliens, sir. Sir. 6 00:00:38,160 --> 00:00:45,160 So I'd like to introduce a speaker tonight and start by making a remark that this talk, of course, 7 00:00:45,160 --> 00:00:52,430 about a question that we care about finding as the search for life in the universe is fundamentally important question. 8 00:00:52,430 --> 00:00:56,470 I realise we must look at the cool does. 9 00:00:56,470 --> 00:00:59,800 It doesn't do that, but we're doing our part here tonight as well. 10 00:00:59,800 --> 00:01:08,230 As you enter this room, we were unaware of what we did and not in place of the night sky and what was not to determine with probability. 11 00:01:08,230 --> 00:01:13,990 Ninety nine point nine ninety seven is another aliens in this room. 12 00:01:13,990 --> 00:01:19,090 There are a lot of persistence. I am that point no. One. That's right. 13 00:01:19,090 --> 00:01:29,170 So so go that as the president and Chief Executive Officer and Centre Institute, which he joined in 2015. 14 00:01:29,170 --> 00:01:35,560 It's what predominantly applied technologies with over 20 years of experience over the products and up 15 00:01:35,560 --> 00:01:43,240 to three great occasions and more than a decade in X-ray and semiconductor processing technologies. 16 00:01:43,240 --> 00:01:54,610 His corporate background spans the spectrum from venture backed start-ups to Fortune 100 multinationals responsibilities ranging from R&D, 17 00:01:54,610 --> 00:02:02,140 engineering and operations to sales, marketing, product management and CEO positions. 18 00:02:02,140 --> 00:02:09,010 Most recently, he was the vice president of sales for the Colour of Inc. right hand that the company's 19 00:02:09,010 --> 00:02:16,060 penetration into optical networking of the rapidly evolving went to data centre market prices. 20 00:02:16,060 --> 00:02:23,300 That he was vice president of product management for optical fibre broadband hybrid right modules. 21 00:02:23,300 --> 00:02:28,870 Microsoft has had a variety of senior positions prior to that. 22 00:02:28,870 --> 00:02:38,530 Also waits for the technologies that select Semiconductor and X Ray to Inc., which is not quite as nice as the 10X. 23 00:02:38,530 --> 00:02:44,680 Contract also includes Sections Transit, AT&T and Bell Labs Alternate Products Business Unit, 24 00:02:44,680 --> 00:02:50,810 and he served as president at the U.S. operations and the service company Public Energy. 25 00:02:50,810 --> 00:02:58,910 It's going to be a physics from Holy Cross College and a master's in business administration from Georgetown University, 26 00:02:58,910 --> 00:03:05,960 is plus member of the Advisory Board for the Middle School of Business Administration at Georgetown 27 00:03:05,960 --> 00:03:11,630 and as a current member of the Octopus to the American and the International Astronomical Congress. 28 00:03:11,630 --> 00:03:24,770 Please join me in welcoming. OK, I believe I'm muted working. 29 00:03:24,770 --> 00:03:31,010 And let me start with a spoiler alert, there will not be an announcement tonight about any discovery. 30 00:03:31,010 --> 00:03:35,900 I'm sorry to disappoint anybody who was expecting or hoping to hear the the contrary, 31 00:03:35,900 --> 00:03:45,620 but but I do hope to have some engaging and compelling and fun information for you about the search for intelligent life, actually. 32 00:03:45,620 --> 00:03:50,270 Indeed. More broadly, the search for life in the universe and the work we do at the City Institute. 33 00:03:50,270 --> 00:04:00,140 So I hope to introduce you to the City Institute, to the research, education and outreach programmes of the institute and most importantly, 34 00:04:00,140 --> 00:04:08,420 about the power we find in interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary science, science and also the power of partnership and collaboration, 35 00:04:08,420 --> 00:04:18,170 including a collaboration we have with Oxford University and a machine learning AI programme applied to space science and also the power, if you will, 36 00:04:18,170 --> 00:04:27,050 of space and space exploration as a foundation and a platform on which to engage the public and to get the public excited about science, 37 00:04:27,050 --> 00:04:32,720 about STEM, to improve science literacy, etc. So that's the journey I hope to take you on tonight. 38 00:04:32,720 --> 00:04:37,190 I do want to start. Let's see, I guess a with with a nod to where I am. 39 00:04:37,190 --> 00:04:43,640 I mean, for me, it's such a great honour to be here at Oxford University in the Department of Physics, 40 00:04:43,640 --> 00:04:47,930 to be here at a university with such an incredible history. 41 00:04:47,930 --> 00:04:58,220 And here are just four of the hundreds or maybe thousands of incredible and amazing brains and intellects and 42 00:04:58,220 --> 00:05:05,300 individuals and personalities who have walked through the the the grounds of this incredible campus and institution. 43 00:05:05,300 --> 00:05:08,960 What's interesting here amongst this particular group of scientists, 44 00:05:08,960 --> 00:05:14,630 I did notice when kind of perusing the history of Oxford and some of the noteworthy 45 00:05:14,630 --> 00:05:19,070 graduates or attendees of the university that in the sciences in particular, 46 00:05:19,070 --> 00:05:23,000 last names beginning with H were somewhat disproportionately represented. 47 00:05:23,000 --> 00:05:29,330 So I would like to point out that if you are studying physics or the sciences at Oxford and your last name begins with H, 48 00:05:29,330 --> 00:05:34,430 we have high expectations, so please keep that in mind. 49 00:05:34,430 --> 00:05:41,000 But of course, there have been great minds, not just in the sciences. We have people like J.R.R. Tolkien, C.S. Lewis. 50 00:05:41,000 --> 00:05:47,300 I managed to sit and have a pint with with Simon at the Eagle and Child Right, 51 00:05:47,300 --> 00:05:53,300 where they sat and and discussed their their science fiction or their fantasy literature. 52 00:05:53,300 --> 00:05:59,630 And of course, Oscar Wilde is another one. Oscar Wilde studied this field called classical motivations. 53 00:05:59,630 --> 00:06:04,580 I have no idea what that means. Somebody here in the audience probably does and can enlighten me. 54 00:06:04,580 --> 00:06:11,720 But I will say that what he. We can get even with him a little bit because he had never heard of astrobiology. 55 00:06:11,720 --> 00:06:20,090 I'm quite sure. So with that, let me launch into a story about the City Institute and what we're all about. 56 00:06:20,090 --> 00:06:22,850 And it starts with a question. This is a good way to start. 57 00:06:22,850 --> 00:06:29,870 I think any discussion and the question is, do there exist many worlds or is there but a single world? 58 00:06:29,870 --> 00:06:34,280 This is one of the most noble and exalted questions in the study of nature. 59 00:06:34,280 --> 00:06:40,370 Now, this is not a quote from Stephen Hawking. It's not a quote from Carl Sagan or David Attenborough. 60 00:06:40,370 --> 00:06:44,810 It's actually a quote from this gentleman, Alberto's Magnus, who is a Jesuit priest, 61 00:06:44,810 --> 00:06:50,660 educator and philosopher in Germany Air and the in the 12th and 13th centuries. 62 00:06:50,660 --> 00:06:55,730 And so it's just an indication that this question is not new. 63 00:06:55,730 --> 00:07:04,190 This question probably dates back to the time that humans first gazed up into the sky and looked at the stars and wondered What else is out there? 64 00:07:04,190 --> 00:07:12,200 And are we alone here? And of course, it was Carl Sagan who famously said, If we're all there is what a waste of space. 65 00:07:12,200 --> 00:07:18,440 So in any case, that is really the underlying science question behind the institute. 66 00:07:18,440 --> 00:07:25,700 We're trying to find out are we alone? So a brief history of study is maybe interesting. 67 00:07:25,700 --> 00:07:30,320 It starts really the and I guess to get back to that question. 68 00:07:30,320 --> 00:07:41,630 The exciting difference between now and the time of Alberta smugness or almost any other time in history is that unlike those past times right now, 69 00:07:41,630 --> 00:07:46,370 we actually have the tools and technology to answer those questions. We've never had that before. 70 00:07:46,370 --> 00:07:54,740 So that makes a compelling case for for this work. It starts really in a publication in Nature in nineteen fifty nine from a couple of physicists at 71 00:07:54,740 --> 00:08:00,320 Cornell University who put out this paper said called searching for interstellar communication. 72 00:08:00,320 --> 00:08:05,450 So this was by Kerkorian Morrison. And it really put forth the idea. 73 00:08:05,450 --> 00:08:10,850 For the first time of it was let's be honest and anthropocentric idea, 74 00:08:10,850 --> 00:08:16,580 because it sort of put human motivations and behavioural characteristics on the part of alien intelligence. 75 00:08:16,580 --> 00:08:20,150 But it said that if there are alien intelligence out there, 76 00:08:20,150 --> 00:08:25,550 if they have developed technologies that include the ability to manipulate the electromagnetic 77 00:08:25,550 --> 00:08:29,570 spectrum and make their presence known either intentionally or unintentionally, 78 00:08:29,570 --> 00:08:34,410 maybe we can listen in and find them. So it's really an exciting and interesting. 79 00:08:34,410 --> 00:08:43,220 And as you can probably imagine, somewhat controversial paper at the time of publication, but it really is the birth of all city endeavours. 80 00:08:43,220 --> 00:08:47,750 And then in 1959, just a couple of months later, 81 00:08:47,750 --> 00:08:57,060 Harlow Shapely from Harvard University actually speculated that as many as 100 million worlds might exist where life has been forged by evolution. 82 00:08:57,060 --> 00:09:04,970 That's a pretty bold statement. Now, turns out that Harvard, if you if you look at Avi Loeb and the muumuu of incidents we had recently in his paper, 83 00:09:04,970 --> 00:09:12,890 speculating that it's possible that could be an alien spacecraft. Harvard is maybe not unfamiliar with putting out this sort of speculative ideas, 84 00:09:12,890 --> 00:09:20,030 but but this was a really interesting proposition on the part of this astronomer at Harvard. 85 00:09:20,030 --> 00:09:25,730 And then in July of 1960, from actually from April to July of 1960, 86 00:09:25,730 --> 00:09:29,930 Frank Drake of Drake Equation famous everybody here familiar with the Drake Equation. 87 00:09:29,930 --> 00:09:34,790 Anybody not familiar with Drake Equation. The doors are over here. If that's the case now. 88 00:09:34,790 --> 00:09:39,500 So Frank Drake launched Project Osma at the 25 metre dish, 89 00:09:39,500 --> 00:09:45,830 which at the time was the large dish at the National Astronomy Radio Observatory in Green Bank, West Virginia. 90 00:09:45,830 --> 00:09:56,420 So that was the first ever city endeavour using radio astronomy or radio telescopes to listen for signals in in deep space. 91 00:09:56,420 --> 00:10:04,880 The a year later, in 1961, a meeting was held at Green Bank that was called for by NASA. 92 00:10:04,880 --> 00:10:13,010 So Nasser brought together a bunch of scientists, including Frank Drake, Carl Sagan and about a dozen others to address the question. 93 00:10:13,010 --> 00:10:21,800 From a scientific point of view, is there scientific merit to the idea of looking or searching for extraterrestrial intelligence? 94 00:10:21,800 --> 00:10:26,060 Is there legitimacy in such an endeavour and undertaking? 95 00:10:26,060 --> 00:10:29,960 So Frank, the group that gathered, 96 00:10:29,960 --> 00:10:39,260 called themselves the order of the dolphin and the attendees included this this kind of interesting range and cross-section of individuals. 97 00:10:39,260 --> 00:10:48,080 But the result of as a result of that meeting, Frank decided, like anybody who knows how to run a meeting, we need an agenda. 98 00:10:48,080 --> 00:10:51,410 I hate going to meetings where there's no agenda, Frank said. 99 00:10:51,410 --> 00:10:55,880 We need an agenda if we're going to have this discussion. And as a result of thinking that through. 100 00:10:55,880 --> 00:10:59,840 He started writing down the agenda items that he thought should be discussed. 101 00:10:59,840 --> 00:11:03,120 Things like, Well, what are the what's the rate of star formation? 102 00:11:03,120 --> 00:11:08,270 How many stars have planets, how many planets might be in the habitable zone of their star, 103 00:11:08,270 --> 00:11:12,980 how many planets that are in the habitable zone might go on to develop life and so on? 104 00:11:12,980 --> 00:11:18,050 And he realised as he started putting these things together, he had a relationship that was unfolding. 105 00:11:18,050 --> 00:11:24,140 He had a formula or an equation which is now known as the Drake Equation, and that is here. 106 00:11:24,140 --> 00:11:34,130 So again, as as a quick review, we have end, which might be the number of detectable civilisations where technology has evolved, 107 00:11:34,130 --> 00:11:42,300 is a function of the rate of star formation or star birth at times the fraction of those stars that might have planets around them. 108 00:11:42,300 --> 00:11:45,380 Back in 1961, we didn't know the answer to that question. 109 00:11:45,380 --> 00:11:53,510 The number or portion of those planets that might be rocky Earth like planets in the habitable zone of their host star, 110 00:11:53,510 --> 00:11:58,400 the fraction of those planets that might go on to develop life sabel, 111 00:11:58,400 --> 00:12:05,240 those that go on to develop life, the fraction of those where the conditions are right for evolutionary forces and processes to take hold, 112 00:12:05,240 --> 00:12:12,950 such that that intelligence evolves and emerges times the fraction of those planets where intelligence and 113 00:12:12,950 --> 00:12:19,550 complexity evolves and emerges that might have communications capability or might have developed technology, 114 00:12:19,550 --> 00:12:25,680 essentially the ability to manipulate the electoral map. That spectrum in a way that might be detectable from great distances. 115 00:12:25,680 --> 00:12:31,770 That's if subsea time's the last. And my favourite variable in the Drake Equation L. 116 00:12:31,770 --> 00:12:40,260 How long do technological civilisations last? And that is not just a matter of how long do they survive. 117 00:12:40,260 --> 00:12:48,120 It's not necessarily that the endpoint might be the extinction of the civilisation, but rather how long might a civilisation remain detectable? 118 00:12:48,120 --> 00:12:54,570 Our own civilisation on this planet is arguably going a little bit dark over time as more of our communications, 119 00:12:54,570 --> 00:12:57,390 including things like television and music, 120 00:12:57,390 --> 00:13:05,670 et cetera, is done over the internet, which is in turn done over optical fibres, which do not emit signals that could be seen from from space. 121 00:13:05,670 --> 00:13:11,850 So we're going dark. We're going to need a little bit quieter. There's also the issue that as a result of the gift of technology, 122 00:13:11,850 --> 00:13:17,880 we've imposed upon ourselves some interesting challenges that we need to overcome if we're going to survive long term. 123 00:13:17,880 --> 00:13:25,770 And so it may be as well that civilisations could get to a point where they emerge into a 124 00:13:25,770 --> 00:13:30,210 state or evolve into a state where they are no longer deploying or dependent on technology. 125 00:13:30,210 --> 00:13:34,440 They're perhaps back into a more symbiotic relationship with their environment, 126 00:13:34,440 --> 00:13:39,090 balance with the ability of that environment to generate resources, etc. so they go dark. 127 00:13:39,090 --> 00:13:45,660 In any case, L is is kind of an appealing and intriguing variable in its own right. 128 00:13:45,660 --> 00:13:49,560 There are some noteworthy anniversaries happening just this year, as it turns out. 129 00:13:49,560 --> 00:13:58,770 So July 1969, of course, the Apollo 11 moon landing 50 years ago, coming up very soon in September 1959, so 60 years ago, 130 00:13:58,770 --> 00:14:08,460 was that Gakonis and Morrison paper, which is really something of of, ah, an important anniversary for the institute and for the science we do. 131 00:14:08,460 --> 00:14:15,090 In June of nineteen forty years ago or so, in 1949 or 70 years ago, 132 00:14:15,090 --> 00:14:21,780 George Orwell published his famous book 1984, saying, OK, well, what is 1984 have to do with any of this? 133 00:14:21,780 --> 00:14:30,720 Well, 1984 was the birth of the said.He Institute. So Big Brother, as predicted by George Orwell in 1984, didn't quite emerge, 134 00:14:30,720 --> 00:14:35,670 although it looks like it's coming along now in terms of cameras everywhere watching what we're doing. 135 00:14:35,670 --> 00:14:43,920 But the City Institute was founded in 1984. Thirty five years ago this year, so an introduction to the City Institute. 136 00:14:43,920 --> 00:14:46,680 Our mission statement, quite simply, is to explore, 137 00:14:46,680 --> 00:14:52,650 understand and explain the nature and origins of life in the universe and the evolution of intelligence. 138 00:14:52,650 --> 00:14:59,460 And that last statement is really important because it differentiates us from NASA, whose interest in astrobiology, 139 00:14:59,460 --> 00:15:04,290 while legitimate, sort of terminate at the discovery of microbes and microbial life. 140 00:15:04,290 --> 00:15:11,490 So we're interested in. So what happens next and what are the conditions under which microbial or very basic life might evolve 141 00:15:11,490 --> 00:15:15,780 into something a little bit more interesting that we might theoretically have a conversation with? 142 00:15:15,780 --> 00:15:20,580 For example, so in a sense, we're boldly going where no other institute goes before. 143 00:15:20,580 --> 00:15:23,100 We're the only institute in the world, to my knowledge, 144 00:15:23,100 --> 00:15:30,180 whose singular mission and purpose is this search for extraterrestrial life from the microbial level on up. 145 00:15:30,180 --> 00:15:35,100 So that's the sole purpose and science mission of the institute. 146 00:15:35,100 --> 00:15:40,770 We're all here simply to answer this question Are we alone? 147 00:15:40,770 --> 00:15:47,820 So what do we do at the institute? Fundamentally, we're working to understand the origins of life starting at its most basic level from the 148 00:15:47,820 --> 00:15:53,220 formation of molecules and prebiotic chemistry to the evolution of more complex organisms, 149 00:15:53,220 --> 00:15:55,230 sentient beings and ultimately intelligence. 150 00:15:55,230 --> 00:16:07,890 So we're really on a journey to try to understand how we went from the pre biological sort of current galactically structured universe. 151 00:16:07,890 --> 00:16:12,690 How did we go from the early cosmology following the Big Bang through to the onset of 152 00:16:12,690 --> 00:16:18,330 chemistry and this transition from chemistry and prebiotic chemistry into biology? 153 00:16:18,330 --> 00:16:23,280 And ultimately, how did biology evolve, at least on this planet, to give us philosophy? 154 00:16:23,280 --> 00:16:30,150 That's the journey and mission of the institute. We have our own sort of giants that we we stand on the shoulders of at the institute. 155 00:16:30,150 --> 00:16:35,160 Frank Drake himself was one of the founders. Frank is now 88 years old. 156 00:16:35,160 --> 00:16:40,320 He's still around. He still comes out of the institute about once a week, and it's always fun for him to come into the institute. 157 00:16:40,320 --> 00:16:44,190 When I happen to be giving a tour and happening to be standing by the Drake Equation, 158 00:16:44,190 --> 00:16:49,500 which is in the front lobby and happened to be describing it and somebody asks me, was frank still around? 159 00:16:49,500 --> 00:16:52,800 And he walks through the door at that moment, and that's really good. 160 00:16:52,800 --> 00:16:57,750 I've told him that that happened once and I've told him I want to have him sitting at a desk outside the 161 00:16:57,750 --> 00:17:03,060 door where I push a button and he comes in on cue because it was it was so brilliant when that happened. 162 00:17:03,060 --> 00:17:07,500 Carl Sagan was another one of the original founders of the institute, as was Charles Townes. 163 00:17:07,500 --> 00:17:11,340 Charles Townes is a Nobel laureate who was the inventor of the laser and the laser. 164 00:17:11,340 --> 00:17:17,340 So everything that has to do with lasers, whether it's surgery or communications or supermarket scanners, 165 00:17:17,340 --> 00:17:21,840 ultimately traces back to the work of Charlie Townes and then Jill Tarter, 166 00:17:21,840 --> 00:17:26,370 who is a woman astronomer at a time when women weren't even allowed in observatories. 167 00:17:26,370 --> 00:17:31,740 So talk about a strong character and a brave character and a brilliant, brilliant mind. 168 00:17:31,740 --> 00:17:35,430 Anybody see the movie? Contact most everybody or a lot of people? 169 00:17:35,430 --> 00:17:45,270 If you haven't, I recommend it. It's still as as interesting and fascinating today as it was 25 years ago, or 20, at least when it first came out. 170 00:17:45,270 --> 00:17:50,070 But Jill, being a colleague and contemporary of Carl Sagan's from Cornell, as was Frank. 171 00:17:50,070 --> 00:17:54,600 So Frank and Carl and Jill all came out of Cornell Astronomy and Astrophysics. 172 00:17:54,600 --> 00:17:58,770 Jill was the inspiration for the character played by Jodie Foster in that movie. 173 00:17:58,770 --> 00:18:02,550 I like to point out that she is, you know, the movie. 174 00:18:02,550 --> 00:18:06,810 The first half of the movie is based on Jill's life, not the second half, but in any case. 175 00:18:06,810 --> 00:18:10,560 So Jill is is another one of our our founders. 176 00:18:10,560 --> 00:18:15,960 In 1984, when the institute was founded, there was four trustees, one principal investigator that was Jill. 177 00:18:15,960 --> 00:18:23,880 And as of 2019, we have 16 trustees. We also have a science advisory board that includes, amongst others, Brother Guy console.log. 178 00:18:23,880 --> 00:18:29,100 Now, who's the astronomer for the Vatican? And a lot of other notables on the science board. 179 00:18:29,100 --> 00:18:35,700 We have 90 scientists and and principal investigators. They represent 23 different academic research disciplines. 180 00:18:35,700 --> 00:18:44,460 We have them organised into six research divisions. We also have 70 affiliates or affiliates are individuals who write grant proposals under the. 181 00:18:44,460 --> 00:18:50,310 And through the Senate Study Institute to submit to NASA or other funding agencies. 182 00:18:50,310 --> 00:18:54,420 We have three primary activity centres, which I'll describe in a moment. 183 00:18:54,420 --> 00:19:01,920 And in addition to the research, which is our primary function, we do have 28 of the other staff who are involved in things like education programmes, 184 00:19:01,920 --> 00:19:06,420 outreach and communications, grant proposal writing and the middle and, of course, 185 00:19:06,420 --> 00:19:10,560 administrative and support staff who are equally important members of the team. 186 00:19:10,560 --> 00:19:15,510 So our primary structure around these three centres that I mentioned before is research, 187 00:19:15,510 --> 00:19:22,380 which we say is to explore it's education to inspire and its outreach to engage. 188 00:19:22,380 --> 00:19:27,990 And the engagement of the public is something we take very seriously as serious as our science. 189 00:19:27,990 --> 00:19:33,090 We are a principal science partner to NASA, where one of the top 100 contractors to NASA. 190 00:19:33,090 --> 00:19:38,370 I will point out that the difference between sort of the bottom part of the 100 and the top part is really big. 191 00:19:38,370 --> 00:19:45,180 So we're nowhere near the size of Northrop Grumman or or Boeing, but but we are at least in that top 100. 192 00:19:45,180 --> 00:19:50,280 We also get funding from U.S. Geological Survey from the National Science Foundation, 193 00:19:50,280 --> 00:19:56,430 Space Telescope Institute, National Institute of Health, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 194 00:19:56,430 --> 00:20:05,370 But the bulk of our of our funding comes from NASA. As such, we are, by definition, a publicly funded, taxpayer funded enterprise. 195 00:20:05,370 --> 00:20:13,050 And as a result, we have a responsibility and a duty to give back and share with the public the work and the science we do at the institute. 196 00:20:13,050 --> 00:20:16,170 So that's why outreach and public engagement is so important. 197 00:20:16,170 --> 00:20:25,770 I think in addition to its opportunity to hopefully inspire and engage the public, it's it's a it's an actual duty and responsibility. 198 00:20:25,770 --> 00:20:31,530 The Carl Sagan Centre for Outreach, sorry for research, is structured into six areas six domains, 199 00:20:31,530 --> 00:20:40,100 so astronomy and astrophysics, exoplanets, climate and geoscience, planetary exploration, which is really about. 200 00:20:40,100 --> 00:20:46,640 A study of our own solar system and how do we explore the planets and moons of our own solar system? 201 00:20:46,640 --> 00:20:53,690 Astrobiology, which is, on the one hand, an envelope expression which could be used to describe all of the work of the institute. 202 00:20:53,690 --> 00:21:00,530 But in this case, I'm referring to astrobiology in terms of the study of what we call extremophiles or extreme biology life in extreme 203 00:21:00,530 --> 00:21:08,150 environments and how that research informs us in terms of the science we undertake for study endeavours more broadly. 204 00:21:08,150 --> 00:21:10,040 And then last but certainly not least, 205 00:21:10,040 --> 00:21:18,050 the namesake activity our study programmes in which we leverage both the optical and the radio domain to do steady work. 206 00:21:18,050 --> 00:21:23,360 I will say that in the area of exoplanets in particular, we've had a lot of engagement. 207 00:21:23,360 --> 00:21:29,570 We had members of the science team of a programme called the PI, the Gemini Planetary Imager, 208 00:21:29,570 --> 00:21:33,920 which was using the eight metre telescope Gemini Telescope in Chile, 209 00:21:33,920 --> 00:21:40,670 which took the first ever photograph actual image of a planet around another star. 210 00:21:40,670 --> 00:21:44,900 And that was done in 2015, and that was done using technology called adaptive optics, 211 00:21:44,900 --> 00:21:50,420 which compensated for the Earth's distortion of the atmosphere and also a coronagraph 212 00:21:50,420 --> 00:21:55,460 which blocked the light of the star so that you could image something close to that star. 213 00:21:55,460 --> 00:22:02,060 A very important technology. So leveraging those two technologies, we took the first ever photograph of a planet around another star, 214 00:22:02,060 --> 00:22:08,600 and it's actually quite a moving thing to see when you realise what it is you're looking at, because we didn't even know they existed. 215 00:22:08,600 --> 00:22:11,270 Not too many years ago. 216 00:22:11,270 --> 00:22:18,530 We also were very active in exoplanets, and I'm going to talk a little bit more about this particular area in terms of the Kepler mission, 217 00:22:18,530 --> 00:22:23,510 which was the Planet Hunter Space Telescope that NASA launched some years ago. 218 00:22:23,510 --> 00:22:29,210 The mission just came to an end, although the science continues. So we'll talk a little bit more about that in a moment. 219 00:22:29,210 --> 00:22:36,310 In the meantime, back to the Drake Equation, I think one of the things that the Drake Equation evolved to represent, 220 00:22:36,310 --> 00:22:43,100 in addition to this interesting way of perhaps speculating on the number of intelligent and technological species, 221 00:22:43,100 --> 00:22:50,180 it's actually a roadmap for astrobiology that wasn't necessarily what Frank had in mind when he put this together. 222 00:22:50,180 --> 00:22:57,500 But in a way, this really takes all the elements of science that we need to consider when we're considering the question of life in the universe. 223 00:22:57,500 --> 00:23:04,670 And so we actually map the research of the institute and the divisions of research to the various variables of the Drake Equation. 224 00:23:04,670 --> 00:23:09,800 So we have astronomy and astrophysics which address things like star formation and planet formation. 225 00:23:09,800 --> 00:23:15,770 We have exoplanets which address things like what fraction of stars have planets and how does that happen? 226 00:23:15,770 --> 00:23:21,500 And then what portion of those planets might be in the habitable zone might be Earth like planets. 227 00:23:21,500 --> 00:23:29,990 And then there is planetary exploration, which addresses both of those same variables, as well as f sabel what fraction of planets might have life? 228 00:23:29,990 --> 00:23:35,240 We still think, and I think there's a reasonable case to be made for the idea that Mars may, 229 00:23:35,240 --> 00:23:40,160 may harbour life, not on the surface, almost certainly, but maybe even a metre below. 230 00:23:40,160 --> 00:23:46,490 Lots of good evidence to suggest that there is climate in geoscience, climate and geology. 231 00:23:46,490 --> 00:23:53,900 I mean, biology and climate and geology of things like volcanology, earthquakes. 232 00:23:53,900 --> 00:24:00,230 All of these mechanisms are intertwined and interrelated in terms of what does habitability mean? 233 00:24:00,230 --> 00:24:06,170 How does life start? How do nutrients and life and prebiotics get distributed in a planetary environment, et cetera? 234 00:24:06,170 --> 00:24:12,320 So climate and geoscience are quite interesting. Climate is another area where we can look at to say, 235 00:24:12,320 --> 00:24:18,890 Is it possible that biology creates a signature in climate atmospheres that we could detect from a great distance? 236 00:24:18,890 --> 00:24:21,350 And we're about to embark on a mission. 237 00:24:21,350 --> 00:24:28,880 The James Webb Space Telescope, everybody, please cross your fingers that that's going to launch when they say it is, but that is going to, I think, 238 00:24:28,880 --> 00:24:35,090 transform space science and exploration and questions like that that we are pursuing 239 00:24:35,090 --> 00:24:39,920 in a similar manner to the way that Hubble transformed astronomy and astrophysics. 240 00:24:39,920 --> 00:24:46,790 I think it's going to be an order of magnitude more profound in terms of what we learn and observe from James Webb once that gets up there. 241 00:24:46,790 --> 00:24:52,520 But climate again, is is an important ingredient in this question of life in the universe. 242 00:24:52,520 --> 00:25:01,400 Astrobiology again addressing the questions of habitable zone planets, indeed the evolution or the development of life on those planets. 243 00:25:01,400 --> 00:25:07,040 That's where those two solid lines are kind of where NASA's interest in astrobiology comes to an end. 244 00:25:07,040 --> 00:25:12,320 At the institute, we extend that study of astrobiology to include how does intelligence happen, 245 00:25:12,320 --> 00:25:17,930 how does complexity take place, and what are the conditions under which that might happen? 246 00:25:17,930 --> 00:25:25,820 And ultimately, what what are the odds of technological civilisations emerging from those evolutionary processes? 247 00:25:25,820 --> 00:25:29,990 And then, of course, our sweaty work is focussed on f sub C, 248 00:25:29,990 --> 00:25:40,160 that fraction of life bearing planets where technology does emerge and also that that interesting variable L and I will say as well that. 249 00:25:40,160 --> 00:25:49,880 When we talk about the emergence of technology and humankind's own position along that spectra, we're only 100 years into our technology phase, 250 00:25:49,880 --> 00:25:56,120 so we kind of defined technology as the onset of the manipulation of the electromagnetic spectrum, 251 00:25:56,120 --> 00:26:00,200 specifically the invention of the radio, which is, you know, more or less 100 years ago. 252 00:26:00,200 --> 00:26:06,290 So humankind is really 100 years into our technology phase, which means we're in our infancy. 253 00:26:06,290 --> 00:26:11,840 I think it's extraordinary to look back and think what's been achieved and learnt and understood it in 100 years. 254 00:26:11,840 --> 00:26:14,510 What are the next hundred years hold in store for us? 255 00:26:14,510 --> 00:26:20,720 I think, you know, it's a it's a nonlinear function of knowledge and information that will just continue. 256 00:26:20,720 --> 00:26:24,110 We're science partner to to NASA on a variety of missions. 257 00:26:24,110 --> 00:26:31,670 We've been involved in almost every non manned or personal mission that NASA has ever flown since the institute came into being, 258 00:26:31,670 --> 00:26:33,650 including the Cassini mission. 259 00:26:33,650 --> 00:26:45,680 We had scientists who using the the Cassini data, wrote the first papers on driving the geology and structure of the moon of Saturn Enceladus, 260 00:26:45,680 --> 00:26:52,850 which is compelling and interesting as a possible harbour of life below its icy outer surface. 261 00:26:52,850 --> 00:26:57,290 That particular moon has an odd wobble as it goes around Saturn. 262 00:26:57,290 --> 00:27:06,620 And scientists had been trying to derive the geological structure that would would result in that funny orbital dynamic. 263 00:27:06,620 --> 00:27:13,640 And so our team looked at the data and modelled a moon in which you have an icy outer crust and a global 264 00:27:13,640 --> 00:27:19,520 ocean underneath that and a solid core and no physical contact between the solid core and the outer crust. 265 00:27:19,520 --> 00:27:27,410 And they then applied that model, and it absolutely nailed the observed data and behaviour of the planet. 266 00:27:27,410 --> 00:27:30,230 So or the Moon rather? So interesting work there. 267 00:27:30,230 --> 00:27:38,630 We've had scientists at the institute studying so-called propellers or proto moons sort of getting born, if you will, 268 00:27:38,630 --> 00:27:46,670 in the ring system of Saturn and the propellers refers to sort of the way that material leaves behind as it begins to retreat in Saturn's rings. 269 00:27:46,670 --> 00:27:55,790 And another scientists looked at the Cassini data and came to the conclusion that the rings of Saturn may only be about 150 million years old, 270 00:27:55,790 --> 00:28:03,170 which is an interesting finding and discovery on a on a planetary system that's, you know, four point two to five billion years old. 271 00:28:03,170 --> 00:28:12,620 So some interesting aspects of that Kepler and K2 mission I'll talk about in a little bit more detail and come back to that New Horizons. 272 00:28:12,620 --> 00:28:20,390 The scientists from the City Institute, Mark Showalter, was part of the New Horizons team, leading what's called the Hazard Avoidance Team. 273 00:28:20,390 --> 00:28:24,440 The Hazard Avoidance team has the important responsibility of making sure there's nothing in the way, 274 00:28:24,440 --> 00:28:32,450 as the spacecraft hurtles at forty thousand miles an hour towards Pluto and now more recently towards the Kuiper Belt object MU69. 275 00:28:32,450 --> 00:28:42,170 And as a result of the work that they were doing in in that preparation for the flyby back in July of 2015, 276 00:28:42,170 --> 00:28:49,370 they started by using the Hubble Space Telescope, and then they began to be able to use the onboard cameras and systems of the spacecraft. 277 00:28:49,370 --> 00:28:57,290 And as a result of that, two new moons of Pluto were discovered that had been never known before, which became known as Kerberos and Styx. 278 00:28:57,290 --> 00:29:02,480 And so they are attributed to Mark Showalter from the institute. And to to the team. 279 00:29:02,480 --> 00:29:07,790 A funny side story is that the band sticks for the young folks who may not have heard of them. 280 00:29:07,790 --> 00:29:15,170 But my generation, we've heard of that, that band, they thought, Oh, well, they the NASA has just named a moon after our band. 281 00:29:15,170 --> 00:29:24,080 How cool. Let's go show up. And so they came to the Applied Physics Lab at Johns Hopkins University, where that the New Horizons team was based, 282 00:29:24,080 --> 00:29:28,190 and they wanted to get their picture taken with the guy who discovered their moon. 283 00:29:28,190 --> 00:29:30,830 And so for about two weeks on the NASA's homepage, 284 00:29:30,830 --> 00:29:36,320 there was a picture Mark Showalter with the band Styx on either side, if you could still find it online. 285 00:29:36,320 --> 00:29:42,890 It's really quite cute, and Mark keeps a copy of it in his office, and he likes to hold it up and show people and ask them to spot the one. 286 00:29:42,890 --> 00:29:50,600 That's different. So it's good fun. But in any case, so, so the The New Horizons mission was interesting. 287 00:29:50,600 --> 00:29:59,570 I also like to remind people how amazing some of these missions are when you talk about the investment of personal capital and time as a scientist. 288 00:29:59,570 --> 00:30:05,240 So New Horizons launched in 2006. 289 00:30:05,240 --> 00:30:09,500 I don't know how many years, but probably at least a decade had gone by in terms of mission, 290 00:30:09,500 --> 00:30:14,360 concept and planning, spacecraft design, development, manufacture, cetera. 291 00:30:14,360 --> 00:30:23,540 And then the launch 2006. It takes nine years for that spacecraft to reach Pluto, and the science took place in seven minutes. 292 00:30:23,540 --> 00:30:33,500 So it's a seven minute flyby after nine years and billions of miles of space travel at forty thousand miles an hour and then seven months of data. 293 00:30:33,500 --> 00:30:39,620 Download a data transfer because it takes that long to transfer all the data back to Earth because the data pipeline is rather. 294 00:30:39,620 --> 00:30:42,440 Ltd. They're not using fibre optics, needless to say. 295 00:30:42,440 --> 00:30:50,780 So a little bit of constraint there, but I just think that's representative of sort of the scientific bravery of some of these missions. 296 00:30:50,780 --> 00:30:56,990 Staking your career on a seven minute flyby while waiting about 15 years for it to happen is pretty interesting stuff. 297 00:30:56,990 --> 00:31:00,980 OSIRIS-REx is an interesting mission. This is a capture and return mission. 298 00:31:00,980 --> 00:31:08,660 It's the first such mission for NASA, other than the first trips to the Moon, where they brought back lunar samples. 299 00:31:08,660 --> 00:31:15,950 But it's the first robotic mission to an object in space where the idea is to capture material and bring it back. 300 00:31:15,950 --> 00:31:22,430 It is not the first time for humankind to do this. The Japanese have done this with an asteroid already once. 301 00:31:22,430 --> 00:31:28,520 But where we've gone to OSIRIS-REx, that spacecraft arrived in December of last year. 302 00:31:28,520 --> 00:31:38,180 It will orbit this about five hundred metre spheroid asteroid called Bennu for a couple of years, mapping it and analysing it and studying it. 303 00:31:38,180 --> 00:31:46,730 And then it will go down to the surface. You can see in this photograph or not a photograph of this animation or cartoon, 304 00:31:46,730 --> 00:31:55,520 a picture of the spacecraft and you see this harm called the TAGSAM or the Touch-And-Go Sample ARM Sample Retrieval ARM coming down. 305 00:31:55,520 --> 00:32:02,120 So the spacecraft will hover very close to the surface of the asteroid. Get closer and closer until that arm can touch down. 306 00:32:02,120 --> 00:32:09,380 Kind of an old fashioned sort of like a car filter, air filter and a carburettor will actually be on the surface. 307 00:32:09,380 --> 00:32:15,680 They'll suck regolith and material through that filter captured in the filter that will then get popped into a backpack, 308 00:32:15,680 --> 00:32:24,890 which you can sort of see as that little dome on the top of the spacecraft. The spacecraft will then return to Earth in 2023 and in September of 2023. 309 00:32:24,890 --> 00:32:29,240 If all goes well, I think around about the 14th and possibly around 2:00 in the afternoon, 310 00:32:29,240 --> 00:32:35,210 it will eject that backpack and it will be parachuted down into Utah for retrieval. 311 00:32:35,210 --> 00:32:42,170 We have two scientists on that team, one who's waiting for the material to arrive in 2023 to analyse it, 312 00:32:42,170 --> 00:32:46,760 and we have another one who was called upon because Bennu is doing something interesting. 313 00:32:46,760 --> 00:32:52,430 It's ejecting material into space and scientists don't know how that's happening or why that's happening, necessarily. 314 00:32:52,430 --> 00:32:58,610 And so this particular scientist has a global camera system that is actually able 315 00:32:58,610 --> 00:33:04,160 to look at at meteorites and trace them back to their origin of space object, 316 00:33:04,160 --> 00:33:10,640 which could be a comet in this case, because the orbit of Bennu and the orbit of Earth overlap and intersect. 317 00:33:10,640 --> 00:33:18,230 The idea is if this object is putting material out on a regular basis at those times where our orbital paths cross, 318 00:33:18,230 --> 00:33:23,060 we might be able to capture some of that material and and learn some interesting things about it. 319 00:33:23,060 --> 00:33:31,190 So and understand how and why it's happening in the first place. Back to Kepler, just briefly, that one launched in March of 2009. 320 00:33:31,190 --> 00:33:39,140 Bill Borucki from NASA Ames was the principal investigator on that took him five tries at NASA to get that project funded. 321 00:33:39,140 --> 00:33:44,990 I personally believe that this is one of the most profound missions in NASA's history in terms of science. 322 00:33:44,990 --> 00:33:51,260 And the reason I say that is because, unlike other NASA programmes and spacecraft which have done amazing science, 323 00:33:51,260 --> 00:33:55,010 captured incredible images, taught us all kinds of interesting things. 324 00:33:55,010 --> 00:34:01,040 The Kepler mission has hurt permanently and profoundly transformed our understanding 325 00:34:01,040 --> 00:34:05,450 of our place in the universe because it taught us that planets are everywhere. 326 00:34:05,450 --> 00:34:11,090 And until Kepler came along, we didn't know that although many in the scientific community, I think, 327 00:34:11,090 --> 00:34:19,550 had a pretty good and accurate understanding of planet formation and a pretty good idea that probably planets are more common than we might think. 328 00:34:19,550 --> 00:34:23,990 The Kepler mission taught us that essentially every star in the sky, statistically speaking, 329 00:34:23,990 --> 00:34:27,320 has one or more planets around it, and it taught us more than that. 330 00:34:27,320 --> 00:34:32,900 We're able to look at the orbital periods. We're able to see how far those planets are from the Sun, 331 00:34:32,900 --> 00:34:38,150 from their star and therefore which what portion of them might be in the habitable zone of that star. 332 00:34:38,150 --> 00:34:47,480 We were able to kind of determine their size, and what we realised as a result is the number of planets in the habitable zone of their host star. 333 00:34:47,480 --> 00:34:54,440 Just in our galaxy that are rocky sort of Earth like planets is estimated to be between 10 and 60 billion. 334 00:34:54,440 --> 00:35:01,730 So that's a lot of candidate possibilities for something interesting, like life to have happened or to have taken place. 335 00:35:01,730 --> 00:35:07,370 So I think Kepler's marvellous instrument, this is kind of how it worked. 336 00:35:07,370 --> 00:35:15,050 This is an animation of of the light curves, which are the type of data that Kepler is is picking up. 337 00:35:15,050 --> 00:35:25,730 So Kepler, first for three years, was staring at a piece of sky in the constellation Cassiopeia if you held up your your fist at about arm's length. 338 00:35:25,730 --> 00:35:30,290 That little circle would be about the size of the section of Sky being stared at. 339 00:35:30,290 --> 00:35:35,420 It's about 200000 stars being looked at for constantly for a three year period. 340 00:35:35,420 --> 00:35:39,640 And what it was doing was looking for these transits or when a planet. 341 00:35:39,640 --> 00:35:47,410 Would go between our point of view and the star and therefore slightly dim the light of that star enough to be measured. 342 00:35:47,410 --> 00:35:56,650 Now this is a great exaggeration in this animation. The light curves do not dip that much, but an Earth like planet around a Sun like star, 343 00:35:56,650 --> 00:36:00,580 for example, might only dim the light of that star by one part in 10000. 344 00:36:00,580 --> 00:36:06,730 And when you're talking about point sources of light on a on a large sensor array, that's a very, very sensitive measurement. 345 00:36:06,730 --> 00:36:11,740 But the instrument was capable of doing that, and it discovered a lot of planets. 346 00:36:11,740 --> 00:36:18,730 So that's the data set as of the end of 2017 of candidate planets coming from the Kepler system. 347 00:36:18,730 --> 00:36:25,240 Those are in yellow. The bluish and greyish planets were discovered by other techniques, such as radial velocity method. 348 00:36:25,240 --> 00:36:29,890 They tend to be good at finding the larger gas giant planets, but not the smaller ones. 349 00:36:29,890 --> 00:36:38,560 The scale on the y axis is the radius of the planet, and the x axis is the orbital period. 350 00:36:38,560 --> 00:36:41,830 So Earth like planets would be in sort of the lower right hand side. 351 00:36:41,830 --> 00:36:50,290 Interestingly, not a lot of Earth like planets with one year orbital periods, although some but but a lot with much shorter periods. 352 00:36:50,290 --> 00:36:54,550 And now we have the TESS mission, which is the follow on mission. 353 00:36:54,550 --> 00:36:59,200 It's the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite and that's mapping the entire sky. 354 00:36:59,200 --> 00:37:02,890 It will be looking at any particular field of view for a much shorter period of time. 355 00:37:02,890 --> 00:37:11,590 But the idea is to map the entire sky to look at stars closer by and to give us more and better information about exoplanets. 356 00:37:11,590 --> 00:37:18,760 And this, in turn, means that now we know where to look in terms of setting. 357 00:37:18,760 --> 00:37:23,950 So Ceti becomes a more purposeful endeavour where you have targets of interest instead 358 00:37:23,950 --> 00:37:28,720 of just random points in the sky to look at a random types of stars to look at. 359 00:37:28,720 --> 00:37:36,640 Interestingly enough, although the Kepler mission came to an end officially last year, the Kepler space telescope is still making news. 360 00:37:36,640 --> 00:37:41,800 So a team at University of Hawaii just published a paper in March, 361 00:37:41,800 --> 00:37:51,010 so a few weeks back confirming the very first exoplanet candidate that was in the Kepler dataset a full 10 years after launch. 362 00:37:51,010 --> 00:37:58,300 So really interesting. And as is so often the case, data collection is one thing, data analysis is another, 363 00:37:58,300 --> 00:38:06,790 and it gets back as well to how we handle all the data we're amassing on an increasing rapid basis. 364 00:38:06,790 --> 00:38:09,730 But but the data is there to still be mined, 365 00:38:09,730 --> 00:38:19,750 and the results so far as a mission update again are 4000 confirmed exoplanets in the Kepler field and over 3000 planetary systems. 366 00:38:19,750 --> 00:38:27,610 And as I mentioned before, between 10 and 60 billion candidate planets in the habitable zone of their host star. 367 00:38:27,610 --> 00:38:32,980 I talked a little bit about New Horizons missions or won't won't go into that again into much detail. 368 00:38:32,980 --> 00:38:37,750 But but they did the flyby of Pluto back in July of 2015, 369 00:38:37,750 --> 00:38:43,750 and also all those stunning images of Pluto that you saw that came as a result of that flyby. 370 00:38:43,750 --> 00:38:47,980 Pluto turned out to be a far more interesting Little Rock than we had thought 371 00:38:47,980 --> 00:38:54,250 has mountains that are made of water frozen as ice that is harder than stone. 372 00:38:54,250 --> 00:39:02,860 So a lot of really interesting features on that planet. And clearly, when you also when you see on planetary systems and moons, you know, 373 00:39:02,860 --> 00:39:07,300 these areas of smooth surface, you know, there's something interesting happening. 374 00:39:07,300 --> 00:39:14,710 There's some kind of tectonic activity or other activity which is able to sort of wipe out in a race things that would otherwise be looking like. 375 00:39:14,710 --> 00:39:21,460 For example, meteor rather impact crater sites that would be on these objects. 376 00:39:21,460 --> 00:39:29,170 OSIRIS-REx, we talked about as well the sample return mission. So this is a picture of the the spacecraft being assembled and the lift off. 377 00:39:29,170 --> 00:39:36,880 I actually got to go and see this launch. If you ever get a chance to go see a launch live, take it, break your date, whatever you have to do. 378 00:39:36,880 --> 00:39:42,460 Go, go see it. It's really quite an extraordinary thing to see a spacecraft take off into space. 379 00:39:42,460 --> 00:39:48,550 I like the fact, however, that OSIRIS-REx is perhaps the most tortured acronym that NACI has ever come up with. 380 00:39:48,550 --> 00:39:54,160 It stands for origins, spectral interpretation, resource identification, security, 381 00:39:54,160 --> 00:39:58,810 Regolith Explorer, and I will decipher that for you in a separate two hour lecture. 382 00:39:58,810 --> 00:40:05,050 Some other time, NASA also has something called the The Astrobiology Institute, 383 00:40:05,050 --> 00:40:10,660 which is a virtual institute where teams of researchers from different academic or research institutes 384 00:40:10,660 --> 00:40:16,840 come together to study astrobiology to help inform the design and development of technologies, 385 00:40:16,840 --> 00:40:21,340 tools and instruments to identify life on other planets and other places. 386 00:40:21,340 --> 00:40:23,860 And we run one of the teams. 387 00:40:23,860 --> 00:40:32,560 It's a 15 person team that has representatives from a wide variety of different universities in the U.S. and other science institutions. 388 00:40:32,560 --> 00:40:39,250 If the audio is working here, I have just a little clip from Natalie Cabral, who is the head of research at the City Institute. 389 00:40:39,250 --> 00:40:45,080 And also the head of our team for NASA. We'll see if this is going to work. 390 00:40:45,080 --> 00:40:54,060 Welcome, ladies, and welcome. My name is Natalie Cabral and the director of the council and Centre for Research at the City Institute. 391 00:40:54,060 --> 00:40:57,980 First, I would have to apologise because I will have to put these glasses on. 392 00:40:57,980 --> 00:41:02,120 The light is extremely bright today and really, this is needed. 393 00:41:02,120 --> 00:41:11,570 We are here today until it is located in the Chilean Altiplano, at an innovation for three hundred metres, so a little over fourteen thousand feet. 394 00:41:11,570 --> 00:41:13,790 And clearly there is a lot of wind today. 395 00:41:13,790 --> 00:41:20,630 The temperature is a little cooler than in buttonless, where we were at thirty five hundred metres and the environment is completely different. 396 00:41:20,630 --> 00:41:23,750 I am here with a very multidisciplinary teams. 397 00:41:23,750 --> 00:41:32,570 We have engineers, roboticists, we have microbiologists, geologists, environmental scientist, planetary geologist and astrobiologist. 398 00:41:32,570 --> 00:41:37,910 This project is under the umbrella of the Astrobiology Research Division at the City Institute, 399 00:41:37,910 --> 00:41:46,130 and it helps us better understand if life has a chance to appear on a different planet in the Solar System here today and for the next three days. 400 00:41:46,130 --> 00:41:51,290 We are here in an environment there where many hydrothermal springs on Mars. 401 00:41:51,290 --> 00:41:54,770 We have the mineral and spectral evidence of that. 402 00:41:54,770 --> 00:42:03,560 Many places like this one right now behind me, where energy, nutrients, water and shelter were present. 403 00:42:03,560 --> 00:42:05,330 So right now we are doing what we did. 404 00:42:05,330 --> 00:42:15,530 In fact, analysis trying to understand how the orbit imagery is informing us about what's happening at a microscopic scale. 405 00:42:15,530 --> 00:42:24,950 Our goal is really by understanding the special scale and spectral resolution and the new methods of approaching biosignature detection. 406 00:42:24,950 --> 00:42:32,390 What we want to do is to create the next generation of astrobiology exploration tools and technologies, 407 00:42:32,390 --> 00:42:36,170 since we know that Mars was habitable in the past. 408 00:42:36,170 --> 00:42:45,170 The next logical step is then to look for biosignatures traces of life on Mars, and obviously they are not clearly exposed at the surface. 409 00:42:45,170 --> 00:42:52,940 So we'll have to do a little forensic. But when I look at the landscape around me and those centres in the hydrothermal springs, 410 00:42:52,940 --> 00:43:01,490 I cannot help but think about our own planet and its beginning and primordial horrors that was pretty much looking like this. 411 00:43:01,490 --> 00:43:06,130 And it's an environment like that where life appeared on this planet. 412 00:43:06,130 --> 00:43:14,810 And now I would like to share with you this flag. 413 00:43:14,810 --> 00:43:18,530 This flag I take with me everywhere where I go. 414 00:43:18,530 --> 00:43:21,980 This is the said institute expedition flag number one. 415 00:43:21,980 --> 00:43:28,070 It was deployed last week still out there, but unless it is here today with a lot of wind, as you can see, 416 00:43:28,070 --> 00:43:41,180 flooding that still as close to forty three hundred metres over 14000 feet and the geyser is giving us a some sort of a fireworks to end this video. 417 00:43:41,180 --> 00:43:45,500 Flag number two is actually a few thousand kilometres south of here, 418 00:43:45,500 --> 00:43:51,230 with Dale Anderson in Antarctica and flight number three flew about a week before 419 00:43:51,230 --> 00:43:58,250 we left on the Sofia aeroplane with teachers and Formula Harmon and Bill Diamond. 420 00:43:58,250 --> 00:44:05,030 I thank you very much for sharing this time with us. And I say on behalf of my team, Thank you. 421 00:44:05,030 --> 00:44:10,040 I have a very nice evening where you are in New York and maybe see you soon at the City Institute. 422 00:44:10,040 --> 00:44:15,790 Goodbye. But in any case, hopefully that gives you an idea of some of the types of work that is done in the field. 423 00:44:15,790 --> 00:44:19,930 So in addition to being partners on on spacecraft missions, 424 00:44:19,930 --> 00:44:26,680 a lot of the work we do is basically field expeditions all over the planet, the Antarctic, the Arctic, et cetera. 425 00:44:26,680 --> 00:44:30,850 So she mentioned Dale Anderson, a Dale Anderson studies Limnology. 426 00:44:30,850 --> 00:44:35,020 Limnology is the study of of inland water ecosystems. 427 00:44:35,020 --> 00:44:40,150 So lakes and things like that. And he's in particular interested in frozen lakes. 428 00:44:40,150 --> 00:44:46,780 So he's been studying frozen lakes in the Antarctic and the dry valleys of the McMurdo Valley for decades now. 429 00:44:46,780 --> 00:44:52,990 And what he's interested in is biology and extreme by biological systems, 430 00:44:52,990 --> 00:44:57,970 complex biological systems that exist in these ecosystems or in these environments. 431 00:44:57,970 --> 00:45:05,620 The photograph below the text here is actually a photograph of cyanobacterial mounds that he finds under these frozen lakes. 432 00:45:05,620 --> 00:45:10,000 So they they go to these lakes, they clear off the snow on top of the ice. 433 00:45:10,000 --> 00:45:13,210 They drill through three metres of ice, typically to get to the water. 434 00:45:13,210 --> 00:45:18,070 They take heaters and they put them through the hole to melt them wide enough for a person to get through. 435 00:45:18,070 --> 00:45:21,910 And then they scuba dive under the ice, which sounds like a lot of fun to me. 436 00:45:21,910 --> 00:45:30,640 But in any case, they see these incredibly complex and interesting ecosystems where life thrives and exists 437 00:45:30,640 --> 00:45:36,370 in conditions that we would have thought some decades ago was not what was not possible. 438 00:45:36,370 --> 00:45:42,160 We also have people studying the neurology and chemistry Janice Bishop as a planetary scientist and chemist, 439 00:45:42,160 --> 00:45:50,980 and she does a lot of fieldwork on volcanic islands of hydrothermal sites, cold deserts and working also with actual Martian meteorite samples. 440 00:45:50,980 --> 00:45:52,540 There's a picture of her in Hawaii. 441 00:45:52,540 --> 00:46:01,420 He or she gets the tough duty of going to places like Maui, while Dale is in the Antarctic, and she's holding a handheld X-ray diffraction instrument. 442 00:46:01,420 --> 00:46:03,850 She's interested, in particular in clays. 443 00:46:03,850 --> 00:46:10,270 Clays, as are a mineral formation, are interesting because we know that clays only form in warm, wet conditions. 444 00:46:10,270 --> 00:46:17,950 So if you find clays on a place like Mars, which we have done, you can infer that Mars and one point in its past was warm and wet, 445 00:46:17,950 --> 00:46:23,290 which is now pretty well widely accepted in the scientific community that early on in its manifestation, 446 00:46:23,290 --> 00:46:28,120 Mars had a global ocean looked a lot like Earth. It was a blue planet, not a red planet. 447 00:46:28,120 --> 00:46:30,370 There's still a lot of water on Mars. 448 00:46:30,370 --> 00:46:36,670 There's enough water locked up in the ice on the poles that, if at all melted, it would cover the planet in about 20 metres of water. 449 00:46:36,670 --> 00:46:45,010 We see running water on Mars. We've had evidence of that from the orbiting reconnaissance satellite at Mars, 450 00:46:45,010 --> 00:46:52,750 and we've even discovered subterranean lakes or we believe we have, through radar data, discovered subterranean lakes on Mars. 451 00:46:52,750 --> 00:47:01,240 So there's water, there's geothermal heat. There are the conditions that perhaps a metre or more below the surface could still harbour life. 452 00:47:01,240 --> 00:47:07,660 NASA believes enough in this ad that they are launching what's called Mars 2020. Some of you may be familiar with that or even involved in it. 453 00:47:07,660 --> 00:47:11,500 The Mars 2020 mission is another Curiosity like rover. 454 00:47:11,500 --> 00:47:16,990 It looks very much like Curiosity. It has a lot more sophisticated instrumentation and technology on board, 455 00:47:16,990 --> 00:47:24,040 specifically designed to look for extant or extinct life on on the Red Planet. 456 00:47:24,040 --> 00:47:29,620 We also get involved in hardware and technology development. So this is Phillip Sarah Philip Sarrazin. 457 00:47:29,620 --> 00:47:35,140 He works in X-ray systems and design development of X-ray instrumentation. 458 00:47:35,140 --> 00:47:40,600 He and his colleague, David Blake at NASA Ames develop the so-called CheMin system, 459 00:47:40,600 --> 00:47:45,850 which is an X-ray diffraction chemical and minerals analysis instrument onboard the Curiosity rover. 460 00:47:45,850 --> 00:47:53,200 So while we are here speaking to one another, the Curiosity Rover CheMin system is up there on Mars, 461 00:47:53,200 --> 00:47:57,220 doing its thing and analysing the surface composition of the planet. 462 00:47:57,220 --> 00:48:05,590 A very interesting project, from my point of view is is Lawrence Doyle, who is a physicist and astronomer who is studying non-human communication. 463 00:48:05,590 --> 00:48:09,820 So he is for the first time. As far as we know, applying information theory, 464 00:48:09,820 --> 00:48:15,520 which was first developed for the telecommunications industry and applying that to non-human communication. 465 00:48:15,520 --> 00:48:23,560 The idea is to look for perhaps the underlying and fundamental mathematical constructs that constitute information being transmitted. 466 00:48:23,560 --> 00:48:28,270 So whether information or communications might be occurring in the electromagnetic 467 00:48:28,270 --> 00:48:35,320 spectrum or in through optics or through chemicals or acoustics or any other means. 468 00:48:35,320 --> 00:48:39,550 The important thing would be to find out if we pick up some sort of signal. 469 00:48:39,550 --> 00:48:45,130 Is that signal containing does that signal contain information or is it just some sort of random noise? 470 00:48:45,130 --> 00:48:53,350 As Lawrence likes to say, and I love this quote, it would be a shame to pick up a signal and not recognise the fact that it contains information. 471 00:48:53,350 --> 00:48:58,840 So he's got some really groundbreaking work funded by the Templeton Foundation in partnership 472 00:48:58,840 --> 00:49:06,070 with the Alaska Whale Foundation to study the communication patterns of humpback whales, 473 00:49:06,070 --> 00:49:11,050 which are extraordinary. They had a global communication network long before we did. 474 00:49:11,050 --> 00:49:14,170 And to to apply information theory to that, 475 00:49:14,170 --> 00:49:21,550 to understand the basic elements that constitute information and communications from the point of view of our city endeavours, 476 00:49:21,550 --> 00:49:31,030 the actual search for intelligent and technological civilisations, we take advantage of both the optical and the radio domain and the radio domain. 477 00:49:31,030 --> 00:49:33,160 The technology is is improving. 478 00:49:33,160 --> 00:49:46,660 That means more antenna, more dishes, a bigger, more sensitive receivers, broader frequency response, a broader dynamic range or bandwidth. 479 00:49:46,660 --> 00:49:52,330 The technology has the ability to look at at long range, but it's still limited in sensitivity. 480 00:49:52,330 --> 00:49:59,140 So sweaty endeavours could not, for example, pick up the kind of radiation that we emit from our planet, which is not directed. 481 00:49:59,140 --> 00:50:07,660 It's not high energy pointed in any particular way. We call it leakage. It's radio, broadcast, television, airport radar, et cetera. 482 00:50:07,660 --> 00:50:15,340 So if we were to discover an Earth like planet with similar kind of leakage, we wouldn't be able to detect it with today's technology. 483 00:50:15,340 --> 00:50:22,840 Of course, we expect that will will change in the future. And again, with our knowledge of exoplanets, we will be able to make more targeted searches. 484 00:50:22,840 --> 00:50:34,450 But nevertheless, it's it's it's still a compelling technology to deploy and to look for signs of technology as a proxy for intelligence. 485 00:50:34,450 --> 00:50:40,180 In terms of the comparison between radio and optical, it's got lower bandwidth, but more complex propagation. 486 00:50:40,180 --> 00:50:46,930 But I think it's also important to note that our search space at the moment is infinitesimally small, 487 00:50:46,930 --> 00:50:53,680 a good way to think about about how much of the sky we've looked at or how much of the universe we've studied. 488 00:50:53,680 --> 00:50:57,400 Next time you're at the beach, bring a measuring cup, stand at the shore, 489 00:50:57,400 --> 00:51:02,350 walk into the water, maybe go up into your knees and dip the measuring cup in the ocean. 490 00:51:02,350 --> 00:51:06,220 You probably won't find any whales, but you would, of course, be incorrect. 491 00:51:06,220 --> 00:51:12,920 Draw the conclusion that there are no whales in the ocean, but that's about the extent of the universe that we've explored through City and Deborah. 492 00:51:12,920 --> 00:51:17,710 So we're really not even at the tip of the iceberg when it comes to this. 493 00:51:17,710 --> 00:51:27,250 This search in the grand scheme of things, we are also now looking to use optical technology to search for laser pulses, for example. 494 00:51:27,250 --> 00:51:34,990 Lasers might be used for communications. They might be used for propulsion as the Breakthrough Starshot programme proposes to do. 495 00:51:34,990 --> 00:51:40,900 Lasers are quite visible and quite distinct from natural optical emissions. 496 00:51:40,900 --> 00:51:47,970 There tend to be monochromatic. They can be short pulse durations, so they're easy to spot right up the road from the City Institute, 497 00:51:47,970 --> 00:51:53,350 Mountain View is the Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, where the world's most powerful laser is based. 498 00:51:53,350 --> 00:51:57,430 And we know that, for example, if you took the output of that laser, 499 00:51:57,430 --> 00:52:03,160 you coupled it into one of the eight metre class telescopes we have on Earth and you shined it off into space. 500 00:52:03,160 --> 00:52:10,360 It would outshine the Sun by about ten thousand times. So lasers can be easily differentiated and detected from great distances. 501 00:52:10,360 --> 00:52:19,120 So another logical thing to potentially look for. So we're building a system of observatories where we'll put pairs of of four cameras, 502 00:52:19,120 --> 00:52:24,760 sets of four cameras or eight and total on six different locations around the planet three in the northern hemisphere 503 00:52:24,760 --> 00:52:32,830 or three in the southern hemisphere to survey all of the sky all of the time and just look for these optical pulses. 504 00:52:32,830 --> 00:52:40,180 And that's what we call the Laser City Project. In terms of traditional radio city, we have a lot of activity going on. 505 00:52:40,180 --> 00:52:45,250 Our plan over the next few years is to continue to develop World-Class techno signature 506 00:52:45,250 --> 00:52:50,380 and city capability search capabilities and to conduct World-Class searches. 507 00:52:50,380 --> 00:52:57,760 We have a radio telescope array called the Allen Telescope Array in Northern California, partially funded by Paul Allen from Microsoft. 508 00:52:57,760 --> 00:53:06,400 And we are in the process at the moment of upgrading all of the feeds or the antenna on those dishes to give us more frequency 509 00:53:06,400 --> 00:53:15,760 response out to 15 gigahertz improved sensitivity so we can look further out into space and improve overall system performance. 510 00:53:15,760 --> 00:53:21,490 So we'll be be upgrading all of the dishes over the next couple of years to this second generation technology. 511 00:53:21,490 --> 00:53:25,720 We're also working now in a really interesting programme with the VLA, 512 00:53:25,720 --> 00:53:31,330 which is the very large array operated by the National Radio Astronomy Organisation in the United States 513 00:53:31,330 --> 00:53:37,030 and the VHLAH is the most advanced and sensitive array telescope in the northern hemisphere at this point. 514 00:53:37,030 --> 00:53:41,590 And it's not typically used. It's not ever used for city endeavours. 515 00:53:41,590 --> 00:53:49,750 Although interestingly, if you get a copy of the film, contact the dishes on the cover of that movie poster art the Velar. 516 00:53:49,750 --> 00:53:58,840 But we have reached an agreement with the National Radio Astronomy Observatory to put out 100 517 00:53:58,840 --> 00:54:05,650 gigabit ethernet spigot on the back ends of the VLA and basically siphon off data in real time, 518 00:54:05,650 --> 00:54:09,250 commensal or, in other words, simultaneously with whatever else they're looking at. 519 00:54:09,250 --> 00:54:15,810 And so this is going to give us an update. I think for some extraordinary discoveries that you know, may not just be set, 520 00:54:15,810 --> 00:54:20,670 it here may not be steady at all, but even just some phenomenal radio astronomy could come from that. 521 00:54:20,670 --> 00:54:27,540 So very exciting project. We're also partnering with Caltech to put some different back Intel technology on the 522 00:54:27,540 --> 00:54:34,200 Allen Telescope Array to undertake a wide field survey for FRBs or fast radio bursts. 523 00:54:34,200 --> 00:54:41,700 If you're anything to do with the astronomy community, you know the astronomy community is very excited by these phenomena, which we don't understand. 524 00:54:41,700 --> 00:54:48,450 They're extremely high energy radio bursts from very, very far away in a millisecond pulse of radio burst energy. 525 00:54:48,450 --> 00:54:53,700 These objects have put forth more energy than our Sun does in an entire year. 526 00:54:53,700 --> 00:55:00,030 So a fascinating area of research that we will continue to investigate with our own Allen Telescope array. 527 00:55:00,030 --> 00:55:04,980 There's also interesting questions about indirect observations of technosignatures. 528 00:55:04,980 --> 00:55:10,080 For example, might transit life curve anomalies suggest alien technology? 529 00:55:10,080 --> 00:55:15,420 So ever anybody heard of the Tabby's Star that made the news a few years ago out of the Kepler data? 530 00:55:15,420 --> 00:55:22,800 So this was a star whose light curve, instead of just dipping a slight amount suggesting a planet dipped by 20 percent, 531 00:55:22,800 --> 00:55:29,280 something huge and interesting is going on in this planet. One of the speculations was maybe this is an alien megastructure. 532 00:55:29,280 --> 00:55:35,430 Maybe it's a Dyson sphere or some other kind of of of a technological object or artefact. 533 00:55:35,430 --> 00:55:40,230 I would say that the current theories that I believe are probably the most plausible is that this is dust, 534 00:55:40,230 --> 00:55:44,730 but we don't have any definitive results yet on exactly what is going on. 535 00:55:44,730 --> 00:55:47,520 It remains an interesting mystery, but it does it again. 536 00:55:47,520 --> 00:55:56,640 Just suggest the broader possibility that there are other indirect phenomena we may observe that may in fact be signatures of technology. 537 00:55:56,640 --> 00:55:59,370 Can we detect biosignatures in exoplanet atmospheres? 538 00:55:59,370 --> 00:56:06,780 So when the James Webb telescope launches, we're going to have the ability to probe exoplanet atmospheres and understand their composition. 539 00:56:06,780 --> 00:56:13,440 And it is possible, for example, to look at an atmospheric composition and make a determination that that 540 00:56:13,440 --> 00:56:17,790 composition couldn't exist without the existence of biology or life as we know it, 541 00:56:17,790 --> 00:56:24,510 or it couldn't be stable. So we might be able to infer the presence of biology just by studying exoplanet atmospheres, 542 00:56:24,510 --> 00:56:32,490 we might be able to reveal technology in the survey of of exoplanet atmospheres. 543 00:56:32,490 --> 00:56:35,730 If we look for something interesting, like SF six, for example, 544 00:56:35,730 --> 00:56:40,710 we might discover something that nature actually doesn't produce, but only technology produces. 545 00:56:40,710 --> 00:56:47,280 And that would, of course, at least be another proxy for the presence of technology or intelligence on that planet. 546 00:56:47,280 --> 00:56:55,530 Is it possible to detect something like terraforming? You've heard of the TRAPPIST system, which is a planetary system of seven stars and planets, 547 00:56:55,530 --> 00:56:59,730 rather all of which are about Earth sized planets around an M dwarf star. 548 00:56:59,730 --> 00:57:05,700 Three of those planets are known to be in the so-called habitable zone of that dwarf. 549 00:57:05,700 --> 00:57:14,010 If we were to start looking at the atmospheres of those exoplanets and we found a couple or three with, say, identical atmospheres. 550 00:57:14,010 --> 00:57:16,590 That's probably not something that nature does or would do, 551 00:57:16,590 --> 00:57:22,290 and we might infer from that that somebody's been doing some terraforming and or messing around with those planetary environments. 552 00:57:22,290 --> 00:57:30,570 So lots of interesting ideas and thoughts about indirect observations of phenomena that we might ascribe to technological civilisations. 553 00:57:30,570 --> 00:57:37,350 Just briefly about education and outreach programmes. Again, because I I mentioned how I believe they are, they are so important. 554 00:57:37,350 --> 00:57:45,620 These are eight interesting images that I will ask you for a moment to ponder about what it is they have in common. 555 00:57:45,620 --> 00:57:47,090 And I can see the dynamics there, 556 00:57:47,090 --> 00:57:52,700 thinking about the maths and trying to figure out the orbital dynamics or something else going on, that's common between those. 557 00:57:52,700 --> 00:57:56,210 Well, the answer that I'm looking for has nothing to do with science. 558 00:57:56,210 --> 00:58:02,750 It has to do with the fact that every one of the objects you see was on the front page of the New York Times at one point. 559 00:58:02,750 --> 00:58:08,540 So that's really interesting. There aren't many other branches of science that have the ability so often to make 560 00:58:08,540 --> 00:58:12,620 the front page of the New York Times as space science and space exploration. 561 00:58:12,620 --> 00:58:17,090 And that, I think, gives those of us doing this kind of work a tremendous opportunity, 562 00:58:17,090 --> 00:58:24,020 a tremendous platform for public engagement, for education and outreach, about our science and about science more broadly. 563 00:58:24,020 --> 00:58:27,380 And as you can see sort of from the breadth of research we do at the institute, 564 00:58:27,380 --> 00:58:32,870 there isn't a branch of science that doesn't touch space exploration and steady endeavours. 565 00:58:32,870 --> 00:58:37,730 And so you can use a platform like space exploration to teach all science. 566 00:58:37,730 --> 00:58:41,000 And there are two things that all children love. 567 00:58:41,000 --> 00:58:45,690 Anybody know what they are. Dinosaurs and space. 568 00:58:45,690 --> 00:58:53,430 So the you know, the first group that comes together and makes the blockbuster movie about dinosaurs in space is really going to have a home run. 569 00:58:53,430 --> 00:59:01,290 But in any case, so why not take advantage of things that children find and young people find and humans find inherently 570 00:59:01,290 --> 00:59:08,490 fascinating and use that and leverage that interest to teach science to to help improve science literacy? 571 00:59:08,490 --> 00:59:15,060 We have a huge problem of science literacy in our own country. There could even be problems in certain parts of the leadership in our country. 572 00:59:15,060 --> 00:59:19,650 In that regard, I won't go into details, but it's it's science. 573 00:59:19,650 --> 00:59:26,400 Literacy is extremely important. Having a scientifically literate electorate is extremely important for our future. 574 00:59:26,400 --> 00:59:33,960 So it's it's really important and interesting and so that we believe is an opportunity and a responsibility for us to do this. 575 00:59:33,960 --> 00:59:39,420 Public engagement and outreach. We're very active in terms of telling stories around the work we do. 576 00:59:39,420 --> 00:59:44,670 So when something interesting happens, we try to get it out in the news. So we publish news releases. 577 00:59:44,670 --> 00:59:54,450 We had an interesting one, for example, in mid-March where we were using a drone to map icy lava tubes in Iceland as a precursor for developing those 578 00:59:54,450 --> 01:00:01,230 technologies that will be used on the Moon and on Mars to go into the lava tubes that exist on both of those objects. 579 01:00:01,230 --> 01:00:06,720 And interestingly, we've been going to a place called Devon Island, which is in the high Canadian Arctic. 580 01:00:06,720 --> 01:00:10,500 It's the largest uninhabited island on Earth. It looks like Mars. 581 01:00:10,500 --> 01:00:17,160 If the sky were kind of pinkish, you'd say, OK, I'm on Mars. It's red, it's cold, it's dry. 582 01:00:17,160 --> 01:00:22,110 NASA and the Mars Institute in the City Institute have been collaborating there for 20 years, 583 01:00:22,110 --> 01:00:25,110 doing things like developing the technologies for rovers, 584 01:00:25,110 --> 01:00:32,940 for habitats, for spacesuits, even for human behaviour in these kind of conditions, exploration conditions, et cetera. 585 01:00:32,940 --> 01:00:35,520 Last year, we took Google along with us. 586 01:00:35,520 --> 01:00:43,350 And what Google did there was bring a team to use Google cameras and technologies to take pictures and do mappings and so forth. 587 01:00:43,350 --> 01:00:49,440 The cool thing is right now Devon Island is on Street View, so. 588 01:00:49,440 --> 01:00:56,310 So check it out. So go to Google and go to Street View and you can walk the non-existing streets of Devon Island. 589 01:00:56,310 --> 01:01:03,210 But you get a sense of what this absolutely extraordinary and very otherworldly place right on our own planet looks like. 590 01:01:03,210 --> 01:01:09,570 Lots of fun. Other vehicles for outreach. We have a radio show and podcast podcast called Big Picture Science. 591 01:01:09,570 --> 01:01:13,170 It's a weekly programme. It's not restricted to space science and exploration. 592 01:01:13,170 --> 01:01:21,660 It covers all science. It should come with an FCC warning that says if you don't like puns, don't watch the programme but or listen to it. 593 01:01:21,660 --> 01:01:29,490 But it's really it's quite brilliant. They do an amazing job, and you can listen to past and present episodes from their website. 594 01:01:29,490 --> 01:01:34,530 The Big Picture Science or our own City Dawg, but it's it's a wonderful public engagement tool. 595 01:01:34,530 --> 01:01:43,230 We have monthly lecture series called said. He talks that we deliver at an auditorium operated by at SwRI, just down the road from us. 596 01:01:43,230 --> 01:01:47,430 And these are free and open to the public. And we videotaped them. 597 01:01:47,430 --> 01:01:56,370 We livestream them when we can, and we give scientists from our own institute, from NASA, from around the world. 598 01:01:56,370 --> 01:02:03,990 Opportunity come and speak and talk about their work. And there's a library of over 400 lectures on our YouTube channel, called said. 599 01:02:03,990 --> 01:02:12,570 He talks that you can explore it, covering everything from dark energy and dark matter to matter to advanced propulsion technologies and so forth. 600 01:02:12,570 --> 01:02:15,810 We have an artist in residence programme where artists spend time with our 601 01:02:15,810 --> 01:02:20,970 scientists over a summer period and get inspired for new works of creativity. 602 01:02:20,970 --> 01:02:26,310 And it's a new method of of of kind of understanding and perceiving the science we do. 603 01:02:26,310 --> 01:02:32,700 Some of our scientists get an opportunity to look at their work interpreted by an artist and see something that they never realised was there before. 604 01:02:32,700 --> 01:02:35,610 So it's quite good. We're very active on Twitter and Facebook. 605 01:02:35,610 --> 01:02:41,160 We do weekly Facebook Live presentations where we put one of our scientists or colleagues from other 606 01:02:41,160 --> 01:02:46,440 organisations and institutions in front of the camera and talk to them about their science and their work. 607 01:02:46,440 --> 01:02:50,620 And we let the public watch and ask questions and answer those questions in real time. 608 01:02:50,620 --> 01:02:56,610 So it's good fun. I like to think again, I mentioned this at the very beginning. 609 01:02:56,610 --> 01:03:01,110 One of the so-called one of the powers of the institute or one of the powers that I think we're trying to exploit, 610 01:03:01,110 --> 01:03:03,750 and that's the power of partnerships and collaboration. 611 01:03:03,750 --> 01:03:09,660 These are some of the organisations that we're collaborating with in terms of both funding and partnerships and programmes 612 01:03:09,660 --> 01:03:16,650 like the Frontier Development Lab and and in academic relationships very quickly about the Frontier Development Lab. 613 01:03:16,650 --> 01:03:21,420 So this was a programme conceived of by the Office of the Chief Technologist at NASA headquarters, 614 01:03:21,420 --> 01:03:26,280 and it was really designed to look at and explore three fundamental ideas. 615 01:03:26,280 --> 01:03:31,620 One, the applicability of artificial intelligence and machine learning to basic science 616 01:03:31,620 --> 01:03:37,380 priorities to the efficacy of interdisciplinary teams working on short time horizons. 617 01:03:37,380 --> 01:03:42,720 Three The ability of public private partnership to accelerate NASA's objectives. A better, faster cheaper. 618 01:03:42,720 --> 01:03:49,590 Results in science. It's basically a programme where we bring together early career PhDs and machine learning and artificial intelligence. 619 01:03:49,590 --> 01:03:52,560 We pair them off with their counterparts in science domains, 620 01:03:52,560 --> 01:03:58,710 and they take on projects that are science based of interest to to NASA and other partners. 621 01:03:58,710 --> 01:04:02,460 This initial partnership is from the City Institute and NASA. 622 01:04:02,460 --> 01:04:09,030 This year we have Google Cloud as our premier sponsor partner, providing technology, money, 623 01:04:09,030 --> 01:04:14,700 subject matter experts, cloud compute resources, et cetera that we could otherwise not afford. 624 01:04:14,700 --> 01:04:20,250 And we have, as of last year, a partnership with Oxford University and the European Space Agency, 625 01:04:20,250 --> 01:04:26,760 bringing the FDL programme to Europe to teams that I described earlier were based here at Oxford. 626 01:04:26,760 --> 01:04:32,190 And this year again, we will be having three teams at Oxford University. 627 01:04:32,190 --> 01:04:42,420 Seven teams at the City Institute in the United States. And it's it's evolving into a wonderful example that not only, I think, 628 01:04:42,420 --> 01:04:46,200 proves out the three theses that Nasser was trying to exercise in the first place. 629 01:04:46,200 --> 01:04:54,960 But what interdisciplinary science can achieve? What these teams achieve in an eight week intense workshop is absolutely extraordinary. 630 01:04:54,960 --> 01:05:02,670 Simon Jackman from Oxford here can tell you a lot more about what the the two ESA teams did last year and what they're going to be doing this year. 631 01:05:02,670 --> 01:05:05,730 And if you want to find out more about how you might get involved, 632 01:05:05,730 --> 01:05:11,460 please speak to Simon if you'd like to get more information to get involved in the programmes run in the U.S., you can. 633 01:05:11,460 --> 01:05:18,690 You can speak to me or reach out to me, but it's it's really an interesting and compelling programme, an opportunity. 634 01:05:18,690 --> 01:05:21,300 And we'd love to see it grow and prosper. 635 01:05:21,300 --> 01:05:28,830 I think there's a lot more compelling and amazing work that's going to be done off of this programme in the years ahead. 636 01:05:28,830 --> 01:05:31,320 These are some of the other organisations that are involved. 637 01:05:31,320 --> 01:05:38,160 Companies like Intel and Videla, they're bringing hardware, you know, massive compute resources to bear on the programme. 638 01:05:38,160 --> 01:05:44,740 They're bringing funding IBM, Lockheed Martin, the X-Prize, et cetera. 639 01:05:44,740 --> 01:05:48,870 So this is really what collaboration and partnership is all about. 640 01:05:48,870 --> 01:05:53,790 And an amazing science is, is the result or the output. 641 01:05:53,790 --> 01:06:00,690 Just as a quick example, last year, in twenty 2018, we had seven teams in the US for this eight week workshop. 642 01:06:00,690 --> 01:06:08,010 We had two teams working on astrobiology questions to teams on space weather, to teams on space resources. 643 01:06:08,010 --> 01:06:14,850 And one team studying exoplanets and developing new algorithms for planet data extraction on the TESS mission. 644 01:06:14,850 --> 01:06:18,430 And again, we we've been expanding the partnerships year over year. 645 01:06:18,430 --> 01:06:21,720 We're about to start on our fourth year of the programme. 646 01:06:21,720 --> 01:06:27,510 And what was achieved, for example, last year, we had nine teams, including the two here at Oxford. 647 01:06:27,510 --> 01:06:31,620 They were from studying six domains. We had 12 partner organisations. 648 01:06:31,620 --> 01:06:35,640 Thirty six, sorry. Thirty seven researchers. Forty two mentors. 649 01:06:35,640 --> 01:06:40,470 Fifteen countries were represented. They came from 25 different universities. 650 01:06:40,470 --> 01:06:46,530 We had thirty two speakers interacting with the students and I rather the participants in the programme. 651 01:06:46,530 --> 01:06:52,080 We have a relatively modest support staff of 10 people supporting that programme. 652 01:06:52,080 --> 01:07:00,030 Again, it runs for eight weeks. It starts with a one week bootcamp that both in the UK operation in the US. 653 01:07:00,030 --> 01:07:08,670 It ends with a grand finale last year hosted an intel. This year will be hosted at Google and we we developed a two hundred and sixteen page report. 654 01:07:08,670 --> 01:07:10,650 I assume you can probably just hold it up for everybody, 655 01:07:10,650 --> 01:07:17,340 but it's available on the Frontier Development Board website if you'd like to see the output of the teams and the science that was done. 656 01:07:17,340 --> 01:07:21,870 What's also extraordinary is in this eight week workshop period, a peer reviewed journal. 657 01:07:21,870 --> 01:07:28,320 Articles have been generated by many of the teams, which in an eight week research undertaking, is somewhat extraordinary. 658 01:07:28,320 --> 01:07:37,530 So that's the the programme, I think is an extraordinary opportunity for all of us in terms of research and education and outreach. 659 01:07:37,530 --> 01:07:45,330 And again, I'd like to think that we can build on this model of partnership and cross collaboration and interdisciplinary science, 660 01:07:45,330 --> 01:07:49,800 bringing disparate disciplines together to do extraordinary things. 661 01:07:49,800 --> 01:07:58,330 And with that, I thank you. How? 662 01:07:58,330 --> 01:08:23,760 One last, one last thing. This is just a little bit of 60 second fun. 663 01:08:23,760 --> 01:08:30,120 Finding life beyond Earth is no longer a dream. 664 01:08:30,120 --> 01:08:39,330 It's a discovery that will likely be made during our lifetimes and it will change everything. 665 01:08:39,330 --> 01:08:46,670 We have been here for more than 30 years, at the forefront of a quest that many consider science fiction. 666 01:08:46,670 --> 01:08:51,740 Mars is the closest planet where we might find the possibilities of alien life. 667 01:08:51,740 --> 01:08:56,690 We are home to over nine explorers scientists. This just takes your breath away. 668 01:08:56,690 --> 01:09:00,530 Working towards a singular purpose kind of best to understand what you have in 669 01:09:00,530 --> 01:09:05,040 your own backyard as you're looking up into the cosmos to understand the origin, 670 01:09:05,040 --> 01:09:13,280 prevalence and nature of life in the universe. What we are doing is to try to understand Are we alone in the Solar System? 671 01:09:13,280 --> 01:09:19,760 Why do we pursue our mission? Because the discovery of life beyond Earth will change everything we understand 672 01:09:19,760 --> 01:09:28,180 about the human past and will open a new window into our collective future. 673 01:09:28,180 --> 01:09:57,494 We are trying to understand why we even exist. We are the City Institute.