1 00:00:08,900 --> 00:00:14,560 Welcome to the Future of Journalism, a podcast from the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. 2 00:00:14,560 --> 00:00:23,460 Amir Silva, deputy director of the institute and director of the Journalists Fellowship Programme on 3rd of May. 3 00:00:23,460 --> 00:00:23,960 Each year, 4 00:00:23,960 --> 00:00:32,330 the World Monks Press Freedom Day to show support for journalists whose ability to report freely is curtailed through harassment and intimidation. 5 00:00:32,330 --> 00:00:41,060 Online security threats, financial pressures, legal threats, as well as physical threats and the stark dangers of reporting from conflict zones. 6 00:00:41,060 --> 00:00:46,460 The most recent Press Freedom Index by Reporters Without Borders found that in almost three quarters of countries, 7 00:00:46,460 --> 00:00:52,040 journalism is constrained, seriously impeded or blocked outright. 8 00:00:52,040 --> 00:00:57,200 The day is also an opportunity to remember those journalists who have lost their lives due to them their work. 9 00:00:57,200 --> 00:01:00,530 The Committee to Protect Journalists has confirmed that this year alone, 10 00:01:00,530 --> 00:01:05,150 15 journalists have been killed in the nature of their work through covering the war in Ukraine. 11 00:01:05,150 --> 00:01:10,410 Narco trafficking in Mexico. And civil unrest in Haiti and elsewhere. 12 00:01:10,410 --> 00:01:15,210 We run the on this fellowship programme at the Reuters Institute, highlights some of these issues and crucially, 13 00:01:15,210 --> 00:01:18,720 to bring journalists from around the world reporting incredibly difficult, 14 00:01:18,720 --> 00:01:24,930 incredibly fast changing situations to talk to each other and to us about what can be done. 15 00:01:24,930 --> 00:01:33,000 And today, I'm really pleased to have two of our current fellows with us, Paula Molina Tapia from Chile and Maurice Onyango from Kenya. 16 00:01:33,000 --> 00:01:37,080 Hello, Mira. Welcome. And Maurice, welcome. Hello. 17 00:01:37,080 --> 00:01:40,460 Thank you so much for having us today. You're very welcome. 18 00:01:40,460 --> 00:01:46,740 Paula co-founded the News Chat Bot The Bot, which received the Journalism Award for Digital Excellence UAH, 19 00:01:46,740 --> 00:01:48,690 one of the country's top journalism prises, 20 00:01:48,690 --> 00:01:59,100 and she hosts a weekly Chilean female only political primetime TV programme and has worked as a BBC News Mundo contributor since 2014 as well. 21 00:01:59,100 --> 00:02:05,310 And Burrows is an Award-Winning freelance multimedia journalist and documentary filmmaker based in Nairobi. 22 00:02:05,310 --> 00:02:10,320 He's written for National Geographic, Global Investigative Journalism Network and Africa.com, amongst others, 23 00:02:10,320 --> 00:02:16,200 and he's produced documentaries for a wide range of outlets, including the National Geographic Africa Uncensored and in TV World. 24 00:02:16,200 --> 00:02:21,900 We're very, very lucky to have them with us. Paula, let me start with you. 25 00:02:21,900 --> 00:02:31,290 Chile experienced a very deep social unrest in 2019, and today it's writing a new constitution that's quite extraordinary to watch from the outside. 26 00:02:31,290 --> 00:02:41,910 What role do you think the freedom of press plays in this debate? Well, a freedom of express and the debate around a free press. 27 00:02:41,910 --> 00:02:46,680 It's one of the important topics in debate in the constitutional process. 28 00:02:46,680 --> 00:02:54,300 And I think this has highlighted some of the ongoing debate in Chile about 29 00:02:54,300 --> 00:02:59,550 how much do we need and how much do we need to protect freedom of expression. 30 00:02:59,550 --> 00:03:08,790 But at the same time, to which extent we as journalists, we who value journalism should be addressed. 31 00:03:08,790 --> 00:03:19,740 So the some of our flaws as communicators, some of those barriers that have impetus to fulfil our mission, 32 00:03:19,740 --> 00:03:24,450 I mean, in terms of diversity, in terms of exclusion, 33 00:03:24,450 --> 00:03:35,220 in terms of being able to really read the needs of Chilean society and to express them in a way that can really inform the public debate. 34 00:03:35,220 --> 00:03:39,930 So I think those two or aspects are in the debate today. 35 00:03:39,930 --> 00:03:45,930 Freedom of the press and freedom of expression, of course, has an important role in our constitutional process. 36 00:03:45,930 --> 00:03:54,000 And I think it has opened a debate about the need for a stronger freedom of 37 00:03:54,000 --> 00:04:00,810 press to protect freedom of press as the basis for other rights in our society. 38 00:04:00,810 --> 00:04:04,980 But at the same time, it has opened a conversation and it should be. 39 00:04:04,980 --> 00:04:12,570 I think it should be an ongoing conversation about which are our flaws as media, 40 00:04:12,570 --> 00:04:20,160 which our what are our problems in terms of diversity, in terms of women leadership, 41 00:04:20,160 --> 00:04:26,670 in terms of being able to read the needs of our society and to be able to express them 42 00:04:26,670 --> 00:04:35,040 in the public debate in order to have a more healthy political democratic debate. 43 00:04:35,040 --> 00:04:41,340 So I think those two aspects are playing a role in our constitutional debate. 44 00:04:41,340 --> 00:04:46,470 And what understanding do you think there is in the public and those playing the key roles in writing the 45 00:04:46,470 --> 00:04:56,010 Constitution on how important the media can be should be because Chile has gone from an authoritarian regime with, 46 00:04:56,010 --> 00:05:02,280 you know, kind of incredibly strict controls on press freedom to one that's emerging and is now really 47 00:05:02,280 --> 00:05:06,840 quite vibrant in this kind of big civil society in a protest movements across the country. 48 00:05:06,840 --> 00:05:10,980 I'm just wondering where you see journalism fitting in that? Yeah, 49 00:05:10,980 --> 00:05:21,990 that's a that's a very interesting question because I think one of the of the problems for Chile was our our our own lack of awareness about 50 00:05:21,990 --> 00:05:38,760 about the enormous amounts of a lot of problems that the society was dealing with and the need for a better and more secure health system, 51 00:05:38,760 --> 00:05:46,980 a more egalitarian educational system, a better provision of some basic securities, 52 00:05:46,980 --> 00:05:53,430 and that the fact that the media was not capable to see that coming. 53 00:05:53,430 --> 00:06:00,180 That points, in my opinion, to a flaw in our practises that we need to address that we can address. 54 00:06:00,180 --> 00:06:05,670 I think with complete respect to freedom of the press. 55 00:06:05,670 --> 00:06:10,000 But I think we also need to understand that. 56 00:06:10,000 --> 00:06:16,480 People may not feel or some people may need to be reassured to understand better, 57 00:06:16,480 --> 00:06:21,670 which is the role of the media, which is the role of the press and why it is important. 58 00:06:21,670 --> 00:06:29,020 A free press in the country because in order to understand that, I think we will have a better support for press freedom. 59 00:06:29,020 --> 00:06:37,480 And I'm seeing this in the context of a of a constitutional process that is trying to to better balance the the, 60 00:06:37,480 --> 00:06:49,870 of course, the freedom that is available for us as a society, but also a stronger public provision of some basic needs. 61 00:06:49,870 --> 00:06:59,530 I'm talking about again health, education and retirement and retirement system that doesn't rely so much on private and market and free market. 62 00:06:59,530 --> 00:07:09,580 So in this balance between how much the estate can secure for TV and society to be a democratic and a stable nation, 63 00:07:09,580 --> 00:07:18,730 and how important is to value democracy? I think this is the the place where our more important discussions are taking place. 64 00:07:18,730 --> 00:07:23,920 And of course, freedom of press is at the centre or is part of that conversation. 65 00:07:23,920 --> 00:07:31,930 That's really interesting to hear. Thank you. Lawrence, I'm going to go to you and to Kenya, which is coming at this issue from a very different way. 66 00:07:31,930 --> 00:07:37,480 You could Article 34 of the 2010 Constitution that guarantees freedom of the press. 67 00:07:37,480 --> 00:07:42,160 But is that the reality on the ground? What's going on? 68 00:07:42,160 --> 00:07:43,300 Thanks a lot. 69 00:07:43,300 --> 00:07:56,860 Maybe if you allow me, I'd just like to make a comment about about Chile's constitutional process and what they can learn from our from Kenya. 70 00:07:56,860 --> 00:08:08,590 Of course, the freedom of the press in Kenya is not that the place where we want it to be, but one thing that they can learn from our processes. 71 00:08:08,590 --> 00:08:15,250 Because when you talk about the constitutional process, they might forget that the media, 72 00:08:15,250 --> 00:08:21,860 the media freedom being included into that constitution itself. 73 00:08:21,860 --> 00:08:32,660 Would play a very big role because in the Kenyan context, freedom of the media is included enshrined in the Constitution, 74 00:08:32,660 --> 00:08:41,750 that helps a lot in securing some of the freedoms that we now enjoy and of having a vibrant media. 75 00:08:41,750 --> 00:08:50,130 And just to respond to your question. The reality on the ground is not what is enshrined in the Constitution, 76 00:08:50,130 --> 00:09:02,280 because we we face some challenges as the media in the country and some of these challenges that we face that now bring a problem to our freedoms 77 00:09:02,280 --> 00:09:14,560 include political influence on both private and state media because we have political interests in ownership of the media companies and all that. 78 00:09:14,560 --> 00:09:27,240 We also have business interests and marketing interests that make it this some sort of self-censorship by media organisations and in some journalists, 79 00:09:27,240 --> 00:09:34,080 because they don't want to brush off some of the jeopardise their income because of 80 00:09:34,080 --> 00:09:39,520 advertisers or to let some people in government angry or some political people angry. 81 00:09:39,520 --> 00:09:50,750 So those are some of the challenges and also. This very slow or literally investigations that have been happening. 82 00:09:50,750 --> 00:09:55,520 With regards to journalists who have been attacked or persecuted, 83 00:09:55,520 --> 00:10:01,880 so we haven't seen much investigations going into that or anyone being charged with that. 84 00:10:01,880 --> 00:10:09,790 Also this issue of police and security forces. 85 00:10:09,790 --> 00:10:15,340 Confiscating equipment from journalists or beating up journalists, we've seen that happen, 86 00:10:15,340 --> 00:10:19,330 especially during the pandemic period, the current pandemic period. 87 00:10:19,330 --> 00:10:25,150 We saw videos of police beating journalists and pushing them away from stopping them from doing their work, 88 00:10:25,150 --> 00:10:35,440 and we didn't see much happening with regards to them being prosecuted or taken to court because they were stopping journalists from doing their work, 89 00:10:35,440 --> 00:10:38,710 which is a protected right, according to our constitution. 90 00:10:38,710 --> 00:10:47,590 So yes, we have the Article 34 that protects the freedom of the media of freedom of the press. 91 00:10:47,590 --> 00:10:51,790 But the reality on the ground, we are not where we are supposed to be. 92 00:10:51,790 --> 00:10:59,110 And why do you think there's such a gap between what's written down and what happens on the street? 93 00:10:59,110 --> 00:11:04,960 I think I think the biggest challenge maybe would be interests. 94 00:11:04,960 --> 00:11:08,530 And for me, 95 00:11:08,530 --> 00:11:14,440 it's political interest in business interests because most of the media companies and the ownership 96 00:11:14,440 --> 00:11:21,670 of the media companies plays a big role in how we exercise our our duties as journalists. 97 00:11:21,670 --> 00:11:31,450 So if you do, for instance, you're doing an investigation and then it touches on someone who has a particular political inclination 98 00:11:31,450 --> 00:11:39,610 that favours the owner of that media you see going to press with that is not something that happens. 99 00:11:39,610 --> 00:11:46,860 So one of the biggest problems that we face is interests of ownership. 100 00:11:46,860 --> 00:11:54,880 And Paula, you touched on this really the kind of the pact between the the journalists and the public has got to be clear and transparent, 101 00:11:54,880 --> 00:11:58,540 and it hasn't been and it isn't done in many countries. 102 00:11:58,540 --> 00:12:09,370 Listening to Moritz, what do you think you would like to see in Chile to make sure these kind of freedoms are protected and of all, be upheld? 103 00:12:09,370 --> 00:12:18,880 Yeah, I think us, as Marissa points out in Cannes and Constitution, the inclusion of press freedom in Chilean constitution, 104 00:12:18,880 --> 00:12:25,090 which is which is something that was that has been discussed and that has been approved 105 00:12:25,090 --> 00:12:28,810 in the conventional constitution that is writing the new constitution in Chile. 106 00:12:28,810 --> 00:12:31,030 It is a it is very important. 107 00:12:31,030 --> 00:12:45,430 I think the debate today is in terms of to what extent and if the state should have a role in ensuring diversity and plurality in, 108 00:12:45,430 --> 00:12:54,380 for example, media ownership. And I think there are problems, there are challenges in media ownership and there are everywhere in the world now. 109 00:12:54,380 --> 00:12:58,990 And in the case of Tillet, the National Journalism Award, Maria La Mancha, 110 00:12:58,990 --> 00:13:06,280 that she has describe it, the media system and Televisa as a room with closed curtains. 111 00:13:06,280 --> 00:13:08,860 There is a lack of transparency. 112 00:13:08,860 --> 00:13:22,180 We will benefit for, you know, more information just in terms of how do we practise journalism and how is in which way the ownership, 113 00:13:22,180 --> 00:13:28,690 the interests of the media owners and the journalists is effectively separated. 114 00:13:28,690 --> 00:13:30,730 For example, that could be something interesting. 115 00:13:30,730 --> 00:13:42,470 But having said so, the idea of the state taking a more active part in the media system, as we have seen all around the world, is is a tricky one. 116 00:13:42,470 --> 00:13:54,430 No, it and it can lead to the suppress of press freedom because the state and again, we have seen it in so many places in the world. 117 00:13:54,430 --> 00:14:04,600 It may take this measures that have been approved with maybe the best of intentions, but end up being used to crush the press now. 118 00:14:04,600 --> 00:14:15,410 And I think the same thing happens in order to those measures that try to stop the fake news, for example, the so-called misinformation. 119 00:14:15,410 --> 00:14:17,980 So I would think we need to be very, very careful. 120 00:14:17,980 --> 00:14:29,200 But but again, I think the the protection, a strong protection of press freedom needs to also address our our force and its acts. 121 00:14:29,200 --> 00:14:40,750 I think too expressed a public commitment to really serve this society that is securing that freedom of the press. 122 00:14:40,750 --> 00:14:45,820 Because one thing I can say on the Journalists Fellowship programme and to journalists generally is you have to advocate for yourselves. 123 00:14:45,820 --> 00:14:51,340 And that's not the same as campaigning of advocacy, but being clear about why you do what you do, 124 00:14:51,340 --> 00:15:00,280 how you do it and how the system works and how the process works and how important it is for the kind of functioning of a healthy society. 125 00:15:00,280 --> 00:15:06,250 It's something that needs to be said outright, quite often where it's just kind of addressed, Paulus points. 126 00:15:06,250 --> 00:15:08,380 The two things I think are really interesting is. 127 00:15:08,380 --> 00:15:18,910 The role of the public in helping protect press freedom because they value it, and then also, as very rightly pointed out, 128 00:15:18,910 --> 00:15:28,000 journalists also need to be truly honest about themselves and take a critical look at their own practises because if they don't, 129 00:15:28,000 --> 00:15:34,450 they can't ask other people to defend their work if they can't defend it themselves. 130 00:15:34,450 --> 00:15:44,680 Yes, that's very true because we've seen the times that journalists have been attacked or anything has happened to a journalist, 131 00:15:44,680 --> 00:15:53,920 we've seen public outcry that people came out and spoke in numbers and see that we need to protect journalists 132 00:15:53,920 --> 00:15:59,800 because they are the people who give us information about what's happening and this is a constitutional right. 133 00:15:59,800 --> 00:16:09,820 They should be left to be doing their job. So we have a good we enjoy a relatively good backing from the public, 134 00:16:09,820 --> 00:16:17,020 which helps a lot in the protection of our freedoms to practise as journalists in the country. 135 00:16:17,020 --> 00:16:20,650 And where do you think the dangers might lie there, 136 00:16:20,650 --> 00:16:25,600 which I suppose the question want to ask both of you is you both hype right and 137 00:16:25,600 --> 00:16:31,390 different ways journalism as a system can be undermined and that's true police actions, 138 00:16:31,390 --> 00:16:35,890 legal actions. But I would like to know which journalism, 139 00:16:35,890 --> 00:16:43,210 which kind of journalists in your countries do you feel are under threat if you do come on kind of physical and 140 00:16:43,210 --> 00:16:51,840 legal and and online pressures that are deliberate that that are done deliberately to try and stop them reporting. 141 00:16:51,840 --> 00:16:58,380 Yes, so in our context, the journalist that I see being attacked most of the time, 142 00:16:58,380 --> 00:17:06,740 people who cover politics and also journalists will do investigations. 143 00:17:06,740 --> 00:17:09,820 We've seen journalists being. 144 00:17:09,820 --> 00:17:17,850 Beaten by politicians, sometimes being slapped by politicians, being beaten by the politicians themselves, not the security guards. 145 00:17:17,850 --> 00:17:27,070 Yes, and being pushed shoved away by the guards, or sometimes even a journalist being beaten by by supporters of a political party. 146 00:17:27,070 --> 00:17:32,560 We've seen instances in Kenya especially and now it's it's a political party. 147 00:17:32,560 --> 00:17:38,830 It's a campaign season. We've seen journalists being pushed a kiss have been like, I think, 148 00:17:38,830 --> 00:17:48,370 less than four weeks ago where some journalists were kicked out of the Office of Political Party because 149 00:17:48,370 --> 00:17:56,740 they're perceived to be from a media that supposedly supports the other political presidential candidate. 150 00:17:56,740 --> 00:18:05,740 So we see this happening as well in Kenya, and the good thing is people come out to defend the journalist when it happens. 151 00:18:05,740 --> 00:18:10,600 So there's that awareness that we need to leave these people to do their jobs. 152 00:18:10,600 --> 00:18:16,870 I think that's quite that's impressive that that people do defend the journalists in these situations, 153 00:18:16,870 --> 00:18:24,990 but also quite extraordinary that the politicians themselves are slapping the reporters. 154 00:18:24,990 --> 00:18:37,240 There's one, there's one one one one, one very prominent case of the time, one of the presidential candidates. 155 00:18:37,240 --> 00:18:42,880 In a press conference, a journalist asked a question and then when he asked him, what's your name? 156 00:18:42,880 --> 00:18:46,840 And then he said his name and he said, I know why you asked that question, 157 00:18:46,840 --> 00:18:51,110 because there's a perception that people from that region support this other candidate. 158 00:18:51,110 --> 00:18:58,990 So this journalist was not the answer. The politician did not respond to the question because he assumed that he's asking that question 159 00:18:58,990 --> 00:19:05,740 because he comes from the tribe of the present from the presidential candidate was crazy. 160 00:19:05,740 --> 00:19:12,670 Wow. OK, yes. Think this is the kind of thing of, you know, journalism can be undermined from the top very effectively, 161 00:19:12,670 --> 00:19:16,720 and that's one of the most dangerous situations to get into. Paula? 162 00:19:16,720 --> 00:19:29,680 Yes. Yeah. I would like to do well besides to condemn all these practises that that abuse or present a threat to journalism. 163 00:19:29,680 --> 00:19:32,620 In the case of Chile, the country experienced, as you said, 164 00:19:32,620 --> 00:19:42,490 mere decades of abuses and restrictions on freedom of expression and journalistic work could I mean, 165 00:19:42,490 --> 00:19:46,120 that could put people's safety and lives at risk, you know, 166 00:19:46,120 --> 00:19:54,310 like journalists who lost their lives trying to to inform and some who risk a lot in the poses? 167 00:19:54,310 --> 00:19:59,560 And I think that as a Chilean media, we need to take responsibility for that history. 168 00:19:59,560 --> 00:20:08,800 We need to make an explicit commitment, as I said before, to the values that the globe ran over then that were captured by the military dictatorship. 169 00:20:08,800 --> 00:20:13,740 And at the same time, I think we need to keep our eyes open about. 170 00:20:13,740 --> 00:20:21,450 How are human rights? Of course, in general and embrace prudent should be protected. 171 00:20:21,450 --> 00:20:27,720 And journalists need some securities and securities to to fulfil their job. 172 00:20:27,720 --> 00:20:42,360 And in that time it was very disturbing what happened during the 2019 protests because we had so many complaints of mistreatment of journalists. 173 00:20:42,360 --> 00:20:49,710 So cases that are that were highlighted by the National Institute of Human Rights in 174 00:20:49,710 --> 00:20:55,740 Chile and that in many cases affected journalists who were there doing their job. 175 00:20:55,740 --> 00:21:07,170 We have some very concerning denounces of spying on journalists who have been investigated in the military forces and that needed to be addressed. 176 00:21:07,170 --> 00:21:19,890 And those are things also create a like all the the the the the the worry of of Chilean society. 177 00:21:19,890 --> 00:21:28,350 But I think we need to be more very well aware of those threats because there is no 178 00:21:28,350 --> 00:21:37,680 such place where sadly human rights abuses are left really lessons that last forever. 179 00:21:37,680 --> 00:21:45,210 I think that the commitment around human rights, it needs to be a permanent fund, a daily wound, 180 00:21:45,210 --> 00:21:55,410 because if not even the worst and most tragic moments of history may be repeated. 181 00:21:55,410 --> 00:22:04,050 Thank you. The need for absolutely constant vigilance, which we've seen in many countries around the world. 182 00:22:04,050 --> 00:22:09,810 Let me kind of end with a kind of question about going forward. What do we do going forward, Paula? 183 00:22:09,810 --> 00:22:13,680 You talk about innovation and you you believe that innovation can play a role in 184 00:22:13,680 --> 00:22:18,450 strengthening press freedom that I really want to ask you about in markets in particular. 185 00:22:18,450 --> 00:22:22,560 Where do you see the younger generations relationship with the media? 186 00:22:22,560 --> 00:22:26,010 Do you think again they will be willing to stand up for it? 187 00:22:26,010 --> 00:22:28,320 Do they value it? Do they use it? 188 00:22:28,320 --> 00:22:36,240 And what do journalists need to do to make sure the kind of the needs and interests of this younger generation are met through journalism as well? 189 00:22:36,240 --> 00:22:43,950 But Paula, can I start with you? An innovation? Yes, I think innovation should be our primary attitude. 190 00:22:43,950 --> 00:23:00,240 It should be like the way that we, as journalists, should wake up every day and to think, how, how do I how can I make my work a better quality work, 191 00:23:00,240 --> 00:23:09,330 a more useful work, a world that can really contribute to the public debate and to inform citizens to a strong democracy? 192 00:23:09,330 --> 00:23:14,880 And that takes a lot of effort that takes a lot of imagination. 193 00:23:14,880 --> 00:23:19,260 Sometimes the need to find new solutions for all problems. 194 00:23:19,260 --> 00:23:24,900 You need to try to find new ways to reach your audience to think, Where is the audience? 195 00:23:24,900 --> 00:23:31,890 What can I reach the people that I think that I believe will benefit from my work, 196 00:23:31,890 --> 00:23:39,330 from the information I'm collecting and I need, and I need new ways to collect information to to make my our work worthy. 197 00:23:39,330 --> 00:23:48,270 I think that's that important innovation takes such an important role and that I think we need to have a more innovative attitude. 198 00:23:48,270 --> 00:24:00,540 We need more innovation in media. And we have seen that in many cases when there is innovation, there is also a better address of gender issues. 199 00:24:00,540 --> 00:24:09,030 For example, when there is innovation, there is a better address of social inequalities, which is such a huge part of me. 200 00:24:09,030 --> 00:24:15,660 So I think my my hope is that old media go on that and that direction. 201 00:24:15,660 --> 00:24:24,630 And I think it's it's been important in the case of what the next chapter that that we founded with journalists and fans, 202 00:24:24,630 --> 00:24:29,130 these guys need to end and reinforce that I'm not part of the board anymore, 203 00:24:29,130 --> 00:24:34,410 but it's doing such a great job in, for example, 204 00:24:34,410 --> 00:24:41,280 informing about the way the constitutional process is taking place and trying to simplify 205 00:24:41,280 --> 00:24:48,000 and to better convey and express the complexities of writing a new constitution. 206 00:24:48,000 --> 00:24:54,670 And I think that's a very good example of how innovation can help us as media as a whole. 207 00:24:54,670 --> 00:25:07,150 Brilliant. Thank you very much. And Moritz. I think what gives me hope about our situation and a up press freedom in the country is the 208 00:25:07,150 --> 00:25:16,510 fact that there's a realisation amongst the young people that we need a place that is free. 209 00:25:16,510 --> 00:25:23,890 Press freedom have to be protected for the sake of having stronger institutions full in the country, 210 00:25:23,890 --> 00:25:29,860 for a stronger judiciary, for a stronger and to keep in check government and also parliament. 211 00:25:29,860 --> 00:25:32,680 And this that realisation from the younger people. 212 00:25:32,680 --> 00:25:46,390 So these these these, they they come out in numbers to defend the media space, the journalists, when they're under attack by anyone. 213 00:25:46,390 --> 00:25:48,190 So that is what gives me hope. 214 00:25:48,190 --> 00:25:59,590 And also what gives me hope in our press freedoms is the fact that it is enshrined in the Constitution and also the judiciary upholds that. 215 00:25:59,590 --> 00:26:08,230 Because I remember in 2018, there was a time that for the government shut down four TV channels, 216 00:26:08,230 --> 00:26:14,890 four media stations because they covered an event that was done by the opposition leader. 217 00:26:14,890 --> 00:26:23,890 And after a few days when they went to court, the court suspended the button and the government had to bring back this, 218 00:26:23,890 --> 00:26:28,480 this media stations to continue broadcasting. So that is what gives me hope. 219 00:26:28,480 --> 00:26:38,880 The stronger institutions and the fact that young people realise that press freedom has to be protected for the betterment of the country. 220 00:26:38,880 --> 00:26:44,370 But can I add something to what Morris says about the importance of institutions? 221 00:26:44,370 --> 00:26:49,410 Of course, the importance of an independence and justice? 222 00:26:49,410 --> 00:26:54,240 Please do. It is. It is also so important so, so relevant. 223 00:26:54,240 --> 00:26:58,110 And I think that the fact that in Teyla, 224 00:26:58,110 --> 00:27:10,800 in the cases where journalists have pulled this denounces about either abuse or threat overstaying the justice has taken 225 00:27:10,800 --> 00:27:21,330 care of the denounces and now they need justice needs to to to offer to make people accountable for those threats. 226 00:27:21,330 --> 00:27:27,120 Because, as Mary says, we need that, that institutions to do the work. 227 00:27:27,120 --> 00:27:32,790 And I would also like to add a tiny thing about innovation that I mentioned new media about. 228 00:27:32,790 --> 00:27:37,440 I think traditional legacy media also can benefit a lot from innovation. 229 00:27:37,440 --> 00:27:43,710 I'm thinking about the radio that I work for a rival but a diva and also the podcast area that 230 00:27:43,710 --> 00:27:51,930 that we create there and how podcast has allowed us to include a more diverse diversity of voices, 231 00:27:51,930 --> 00:27:56,250 more women. We are reaching young people. 232 00:27:56,250 --> 00:28:03,690 So there is also this space for innovation, and it's so important all across the media, new media, legacy media, traditional media. 233 00:28:03,690 --> 00:28:09,180 We can all benefit from it. Absolutely. Thank you. Thank you both for joining us today. 234 00:28:09,180 --> 00:28:16,320 Our guest today. But journalists fellows Paola Polina Tapia and Moritz Onyango, thank you for having us. 235 00:28:16,320 --> 00:28:22,080 Thank you. And thank you, Paula. Thank you for the invitation and to the institute, of course. 236 00:28:22,080 --> 00:28:28,410 Thank you. Make sure you follow our podcast channel on Spotify or Apple Podcasts so you don't miss the next episode. 237 00:28:28,410 --> 00:28:30,930 And if you don't want to miss any news from the institute, 238 00:28:30,930 --> 00:28:35,940 subscribe to our weekly newsletter by clicking the link on our Twitter bio or on our homepage. 239 00:28:35,940 --> 00:28:43,944 Thank you for listening to Future of Journalism on Selva. We'll be back soon.