1 00:00:00,820 --> 00:00:04,480 I can. 2 00:00:08,790 --> 00:00:14,460 Thank you all for joining. Welcome to everyone for one of the Oxford Middle East Centre's Book Review Sessions. 3 00:00:14,520 --> 00:00:23,470 It's really a pleasure for me to welcome back one of our alumni and a colleague of mine from my doctoral days at Princeton. 4 00:00:23,490 --> 00:00:33,600 So Aaron Roxann, who is an Intel graduate from over a decade ago at this point at Oxford in the modern Middle Eastern studies program, 5 00:00:33,900 --> 00:00:43,800 and afterwards joined Princeton, which is where we met for the first time and completed his Ph.D. and his first book, Under Normal Zimmer. 6 00:00:44,490 --> 00:00:46,440 And we actually attended some of the same classes. 7 00:00:46,440 --> 00:00:52,950 There's really a wonderful opportunity to have you back, Aaron, and really would like to welcome you to talk about your second book. 8 00:00:53,550 --> 00:00:59,250 So Aaron has a young scholar who has been remarkably prolific at this point in his career, 9 00:00:59,670 --> 00:01:05,219 has published two books and I guess over a dozen articles at this point, perhaps only ten. 10 00:01:05,220 --> 00:01:09,540 But I understand that there's inflation these days, so I see how we get the 12th. 11 00:01:09,930 --> 00:01:18,300 Right? Right. And and so your work has been particularly focussed on Egypt's modern Egypt and the movement currently known as Salafism. 12 00:01:18,660 --> 00:01:21,479 In many respects, your interlocutors are people like only those yet. 13 00:01:21,480 --> 00:01:28,410 And I guess to a certain extent, someone like Walter Armbrust, who would have been one of the early introduces for you to Egypt, so to speak. 14 00:01:28,920 --> 00:01:33,750 And your first book was Practising Islam in Egypt, Print Media and the Islamic Revival. 15 00:01:33,840 --> 00:01:39,419 And I think it's a very significant contribution that complicates the sort of the generic picture of 16 00:01:39,420 --> 00:01:44,250 the Islamic revival that is seen as suddenly emerging out of out of the blue almost in the 1970s. 17 00:01:44,520 --> 00:01:51,120 And you really sort of do wonderful digging and looking at exactly sort of the context in which various 18 00:01:51,120 --> 00:01:56,849 actors are engaging that in that process and not just sort of it's not a uniform process by any means. 19 00:01:56,850 --> 00:02:01,680 So I think that that was a wonderful sort of contribution to the literature on contemporary Islam. 20 00:02:02,040 --> 00:02:08,910 And now you've given us another one within four years of your first book, as far as I can see, which is a really impressive achievement. 21 00:02:09,300 --> 00:02:15,000 And this one is once again, you had you had the screen just on the page a moment ago. 22 00:02:15,300 --> 00:02:18,209 So I unfortunately cannot recall the name off the top of my head. 23 00:02:18,210 --> 00:02:23,370 So in the shade of the sudden stylistic piety of the 20th century Middle East, I'll put it up. 24 00:02:23,820 --> 00:02:26,910 Thank you. Thank you. I was going to depend on that as a crutch. 25 00:02:27,300 --> 00:02:35,040 And I've started reading the text really sort of brilliantly written and always wonderful to see you engage the sort of 26 00:02:35,040 --> 00:02:41,699 literature so consequently and thoughtfully and really looking forward to your presentation for the next 40 or so minutes, 27 00:02:41,700 --> 00:02:49,200 and then we'll open the floor up for questions. I just want to remind participants that if you have any questions, you can put them in the chat. 28 00:02:49,530 --> 00:02:53,360 But if anyone wants to, since there's a relatively manageable number of participants, 29 00:02:53,910 --> 00:02:58,860 if you'd like to ask your question orally, Ayaan and I are happy to sort of welcome you to do that. 30 00:02:59,310 --> 00:03:03,629 So without further ado, I'd like to welcome you here and to go ahead and present. 31 00:03:03,630 --> 00:03:07,050 Thank you for Sam. It's wonderful to be here virtually. 32 00:03:07,140 --> 00:03:11,400 It'd be even more lovely to be in person, but that would be a very long journey. 33 00:03:12,030 --> 00:03:17,340 I obviously have very, very fond memories of my days at centre at this college. 34 00:03:17,970 --> 00:03:22,170 You noted that I had worked with Walter Armbrust when I was a grad student at Oxford, 35 00:03:22,530 --> 00:03:26,579 and in many respects working with Walter was really formative in terms of asking the 36 00:03:26,580 --> 00:03:32,880 kinds of questions of social practice and performance that lie at the heart of this book. 37 00:03:33,180 --> 00:03:37,530 I later went down the Islamic Studies rabbit hole, but this was really before. 38 00:03:37,530 --> 00:03:44,250 And I sometimes joke that insofar as I studied with Walter first, I wasn't socialised as a pharmacist, 39 00:03:44,490 --> 00:03:51,540 but I think that actually that different socialisation has real benefits in terms of thinking through some of the questions of Islamic studies. 40 00:03:52,080 --> 00:03:59,400 I want to thank also Michael Willis for inviting me and also to Caroline for taking care of all the details of this talk. 41 00:03:59,880 --> 00:04:04,620 And yes, I think back very fondly to our days as grad students at Princeton did at some two classes, 42 00:04:05,160 --> 00:04:10,870 and also to kind of see the work that you and other of our classmates have produced since that. 43 00:04:11,220 --> 00:04:18,299 So we give this talk by noting a moment about 12 years ago, in the early 20 tens, 44 00:04:18,300 --> 00:04:27,330 when I first came across the term gender mixing classes and same as I was doing my dissertation on the rise of the Islamic revival in 1970s Egypt. 45 00:04:27,870 --> 00:04:33,360 I assume that this came from social issues and in some sense as a caution, 46 00:04:33,840 --> 00:04:40,800 decided to verify that it actually came from Salafis and to establish when Salafis came to express this concern. 47 00:04:41,670 --> 00:04:49,290 What I just discovered in the process that the cell is to call for gender segregation as a non-negotiable principle, only emerged in the 1970s. 48 00:04:49,440 --> 00:04:56,490 It was ultimately to serve as the basis for this for not just an article that was published in Islamic law and society, 49 00:04:56,760 --> 00:05:03,510 but also for this book project more broadly on the emergence of distinctly Salafi social practices. 50 00:05:03,930 --> 00:05:08,160 Now on the screen you can see the cover of my book, which itself is based on. 51 00:05:08,260 --> 00:05:12,610 A 1980 pamphlet that features prominently in Chapter four of the book. 52 00:05:13,210 --> 00:05:18,100 This is a pamphlet entitled Floating and the Danger of Women Joining Men in the Workplace. 53 00:05:18,340 --> 00:05:23,409 It's published by a leading Salafi scholar from Saudi Arabia by the name of 54 00:05:23,410 --> 00:05:28,720 Abdulaziz if in bars or says for short and if in basketball re-occur in the story. 55 00:05:29,320 --> 00:05:33,910 Now that this particular pamphlet was published by a now defunct Egyptian publishing house, 56 00:05:33,910 --> 00:05:39,850 Max about the sultan and is unusual among depictions among editions excuse me of this text 57 00:05:40,060 --> 00:05:46,570 and so is the text more broadly in its very visceral depiction of the issue at hand. 58 00:05:46,900 --> 00:05:51,879 On the cover of this text, we have an image of an allegedly flaunting woman. 59 00:05:51,880 --> 00:05:56,560 We have her brown hair flowing out from under her blue cloak. 60 00:05:56,830 --> 00:06:01,960 Her blue cloak has a tear on the front bent to suggest a plunging neckline. 61 00:06:02,320 --> 00:06:08,590 And she has a bottle of wine, a glass of wine, and a deck of cards on the table. 62 00:06:09,070 --> 00:06:14,170 Now, this image offers a vivid depiction of Salafism concerned with visibility, 63 00:06:14,260 --> 00:06:19,360 which is a key theme of today's talk and its focus on regulating public behaviours. 64 00:06:19,690 --> 00:06:28,210 And it summons a variety of effective responses, enthusiastic agreement for people who are on board with the Salafi project and for those who are not. 65 00:06:28,420 --> 00:06:32,920 A range of others reactions. Now, if a picture is worth a thousand words, 66 00:06:32,920 --> 00:06:42,489 this illustration reflects how Salafis claim to articulate a vision of public piety premised on the linkage between ethics and visibility. 67 00:06:42,490 --> 00:06:46,690 And this is going to be a theme that I come back to frequently. 68 00:06:47,810 --> 00:06:54,710 Today, however, I'm going to be telling a story not of gender segregation, but of the emergence of a distinctly Salafi fear. 69 00:06:55,520 --> 00:06:57,440 I want to begin with the basics of our story. 70 00:06:57,680 --> 00:07:05,810 In the 1980s, Egyptian Salafi, at least in conversation with like minded scholars from across the Levant to the Persian Gulf, 71 00:07:06,140 --> 00:07:12,740 came to a consensus regarding a seemingly secondary question the required length of the beard. 72 00:07:13,460 --> 00:07:21,200 Now, in the process, as they cited the precedent of the first three generations of the Muslim community known as the pious ancestors. 73 00:07:22,760 --> 00:07:33,320 They agreed that the proper Islamic beard was a minimum of a fist of the cup, and it was to be paired with a trimmed moustache. 74 00:07:34,040 --> 00:07:39,070 The question is how we understand the emergence of the Salafi beard now. 75 00:07:39,390 --> 00:07:45,290 Well, understanding Salafism as a project is to understand it as a literalist interpretive project, 76 00:07:45,560 --> 00:07:48,530 and that in some respects is how Salafis portray themselves. 77 00:07:48,560 --> 00:07:55,250 The argument is that the meaning of the Koran and the Hadith corpus, the authenticated corpus, is self-explanatory. 78 00:07:55,790 --> 00:08:00,860 But the literalism explanation doesn't do much for us here because we have a time gap. 79 00:08:01,460 --> 00:08:11,750 Salafism in Egypt emerges in the 1920s and thirties, but the beard doesn't emerge as a consensus issue until the 1980s. 80 00:08:11,780 --> 00:08:18,990 So we essentially have a 50 year time gap. And so the explanation of literalism there doesn't make a ton of sense. 81 00:08:19,010 --> 00:08:25,819 Or if we are to take literalism as an explanation, we need to actually consider literalism as a highly complex, 82 00:08:25,820 --> 00:08:29,880 interpretive project that doesn't necessarily offer clear answers. 83 00:08:29,930 --> 00:08:35,460 From the get go. No. In talking about the minimum of the fist for the beard, 84 00:08:35,640 --> 00:08:40,610 we've also might reference the premodern fifth tradition in which this minimum appears quite regularly. 85 00:08:40,620 --> 00:08:43,649 This is an easily visible measurement. 86 00:08:43,650 --> 00:08:51,479 It's accessible to all men. You simply need to hold up your fist and to say that there is precedent for the minimum of the fist. 87 00:08:51,480 --> 00:08:57,969 In the pre-modern, stoic tradition, it's clear. But what's interesting here is not the fact that there's precedent, 88 00:08:57,970 --> 00:09:05,590 but how that precedent is utilised in a distinctly 20th century project of religio political mobilisation and change. 89 00:09:06,340 --> 00:09:11,499 And finally, we might come to the discursive Islamic ethical tradition approach, 90 00:09:11,500 --> 00:09:17,470 most popular in the works of Mahmud and Charles Hurston, inspired by Assads work, 91 00:09:17,950 --> 00:09:26,769 which sees Islamic piety in contemporary Egypt generally Salafi piety in particular as reflective of a 92 00:09:26,770 --> 00:09:33,460 longstanding ethical project in which visible signs are secondary and reflective of internal states, 93 00:09:33,760 --> 00:09:37,730 but they are not central to those internal state. 94 00:09:37,750 --> 00:09:47,080 And part of the argument for the linkage between ethics and visibility that I'm making today is for the centrality of visible performance to piety. 95 00:09:47,440 --> 00:09:56,140 And this brings me to a quote that I have at the bottom of the slide regarding the novel function of the beard in some circles in the 1980s. 96 00:09:56,410 --> 00:10:05,469 And this is from a an article published in 1988 by the leading Egyptian Salafi organisation Ansar Jihad. 97 00:10:05,470 --> 00:10:09,190 And this is the organisation that this project really centres on. 98 00:10:09,550 --> 00:10:15,879 It centres on its publication specifically, and it's by a leading preacher within the organisation during this period, 99 00:10:15,880 --> 00:10:26,500 a man named Ahmed Taha Nasser, and he declared in 1988, the beard serves as a noble announcement to introduce society to what it means to be Sunni. 100 00:10:26,980 --> 00:10:33,010 Now, we first might note that Sunni here is a claim by Salafis to the Salafi 101 00:10:33,010 --> 00:10:37,660 understanding of Islam being the what should be the Sunni understanding of Islam. 102 00:10:37,990 --> 00:10:45,670 But in some sense, I'm more interested in the first part of this quote, a noble announcement to introduce society. 103 00:10:46,750 --> 00:10:53,770 We have a concern with visibility here. We have a concern with a social body known as society here. 104 00:10:54,040 --> 00:11:01,060 The relationship implied here between one's visible practices and the broader social hall. 105 00:11:01,240 --> 00:11:04,600 And this is going to be something we get into in greater detail in the talk. 106 00:11:04,750 --> 00:11:14,650 So in some when we look at arm's time Masters invocation of the function of the beard in the 1980s, it raises as many questions as it answers. 107 00:11:15,220 --> 00:11:22,150 And I'm going to seek to provide some answers to the question of where this understanding of the beard comes from, 108 00:11:22,420 --> 00:11:28,210 how it links between ethics and visibility, and what that can tell us about some of Islam's development as a movement. 109 00:11:29,720 --> 00:11:30,080 Now. 110 00:11:30,200 --> 00:11:41,959 This project began out of a series of debates over the definition of solipsism that really were occurring in the early 2000 through the early 20 tens, 111 00:11:41,960 --> 00:11:47,240 and in some sense culminated in unrelated the 2016 book The Making of Salafism, 112 00:11:47,450 --> 00:11:50,270 which was a conceptual history of the terms of the CIA, 113 00:11:50,540 --> 00:11:59,120 and argued that it came by the 1920s and thirties to refer to a commitment, on the one hand to a neo theology. 114 00:11:59,300 --> 00:12:03,020 And on the other hand, to deriving all loss from the Koran and the sinner. 115 00:12:03,530 --> 00:12:08,899 And I really build off of those years, work here with a crucial addition, 116 00:12:08,900 --> 00:12:15,920 which is that if we want to understand the conceptual history of what it means to be Salafi, it's not enough to note, rightly, 117 00:12:15,920 --> 00:12:22,729 as Lozier does, that to be Salafi is to be defined by these two intellectual characteristics by one, 118 00:12:22,730 --> 00:12:28,670 a theological approach and the other a legal approach that these approaches actually are manifested in practice. 119 00:12:28,850 --> 00:12:35,030 And if we want to understand Salafi approaches to theology and law, we also have to understand Salafi practice, 120 00:12:35,210 --> 00:12:41,210 because it is precisely in the realm of practice that questions of theology and law often play out. 121 00:12:41,960 --> 00:12:49,490 Now, I've distinguished myself a little bit among folks who study Salafism as the guy who focuses on beards and pants. 122 00:12:50,480 --> 00:12:58,070 And I take this with sort of some amusement, because I actually think that understanding beards and pants, 123 00:12:58,220 --> 00:13:04,130 which is to say understanding Salafism as a social movement, is really crucial to understanding how this movement develops. 124 00:13:04,370 --> 00:13:11,060 It's not secondary or separate questions in theology of law or even politics, but intimately linked to that. 125 00:13:11,690 --> 00:13:18,839 You're also intervening in a broader conversation in which Salafis who engage in politics are sometimes known as Islamist, 126 00:13:18,840 --> 00:13:24,320 Salafi, sometimes known as political Salafis or Salafis who engage in political violence. 127 00:13:24,680 --> 00:13:31,970 Salafi jihadis or of utilities are disproportionately represented in the literature and in the news coverage of Salafism. 128 00:13:32,270 --> 00:13:38,630 Even though the vast majority of Salafis are actually quiet, they don't engage in political contestation. 129 00:13:39,200 --> 00:13:43,490 The extent that they engage in politics, we might say they engage in the politics of everyday life. 130 00:13:44,570 --> 00:13:51,770 I'm also very interested here to intervene in a conversation about the reproduction of the prophetic paradigm in the 20th century. 131 00:13:52,100 --> 00:13:56,120 And by that, I mean there's no question that throughout time and space, 132 00:13:56,120 --> 00:14:00,020 since the rise of Islam, Muslims have been seeking to emulate the Prophet Muhammad. 133 00:14:00,680 --> 00:14:09,620 And there we can absolutely identify a continuity. I'm not arguing that this impulse towards emulation is in any way unique to the 20th century, 134 00:14:09,950 --> 00:14:17,389 but what is distinct to the 20th century is this linkage between ethics and visibility in emulating the Prophet Muhammad. 135 00:14:17,390 --> 00:14:24,410 And I'm going to get into where I think that linkage comes from or what it can tell us about the development of Salafism as a movement. 136 00:14:25,250 --> 00:14:32,720 Finally, this book touches on a series of debates in the Anthropology of Islam about the nature and roots of Islamic piety, 137 00:14:33,230 --> 00:14:37,700 in particularly engages with the work, as I noted, of Muhammad and Charles Fishkin. 138 00:14:37,910 --> 00:14:43,600 And here I want to note something in particular about the work of some of us, which has in some sense been overlooked. 139 00:14:43,740 --> 00:14:46,160 And to be clear, I think this is a really important book. 140 00:14:46,760 --> 00:14:55,550 But Mahmood studies a series of four mosques, and she doesn't really identify who those mosques are affiliated with. 141 00:14:55,580 --> 00:14:59,030 Ideologically speaking, she identifies the groups that they're affiliated with. 142 00:14:59,720 --> 00:15:05,630 Now, one of those groups that they're affiliated with is the first mosque is Ansar Mohammed, 143 00:15:05,930 --> 00:15:11,470 Egypt's oldest Salafi organisation, and a second is affiliated with Jamaat Dallas. 144 00:15:11,480 --> 00:15:18,290 Ansar, another Salafi organisation and a third of these mosques is affiliated with the as Sharia, 145 00:15:18,290 --> 00:15:22,639 the lawful society for those who cooperate to work according to the Crown Centre, 146 00:15:22,640 --> 00:15:30,200 which, while not necessarily Salafi as an organisational philosophy, has significant Salafi influences within it. 147 00:15:30,380 --> 00:15:34,540 And this is actually a dynamic that is acknowledged by figures such as even vets 148 00:15:35,780 --> 00:15:40,549 that feel occasionally this is one of the rare groups that's not strictly Salafi, 149 00:15:40,550 --> 00:15:43,910 that gets a compliment from him that they get some of that right. 150 00:15:44,750 --> 00:15:53,780 So looking at Mahmud's story as a disproportionately Salafi story, I have a particular focus on how she understands piety and visibility, 151 00:15:54,140 --> 00:15:58,670 namely for Muhammad in the story that she tells and also the story that her skin tells. 152 00:15:59,180 --> 00:16:01,640 Piety is primarily the internal state. 153 00:16:01,940 --> 00:16:10,940 The visible is secondary, if not tertiary, whereas for Muhammad it is the Islamists who are concerned with visible performance. 154 00:16:11,300 --> 00:16:17,450 And what I argue in this book is that this is not representative of Salafism during this period. 155 00:16:17,930 --> 00:16:27,080 And more broadly, she argues that the regulative logic of the women's mass movement is derived from the pre-modern Islamic theological tradition. 156 00:16:27,380 --> 00:16:31,140 And I offer. Challenge to that approach as well. 157 00:16:31,800 --> 00:16:36,820 Now to tell the story, I had to go a bit far afield in terms of sources, 158 00:16:37,380 --> 00:16:42,180 a lot of scholarship and challenges and draws on these major theological legal compendia. 159 00:16:42,360 --> 00:16:44,340 These are obviously really important sources. 160 00:16:44,820 --> 00:16:51,840 But what I would say is equally important in the understanding of the development of ideas and practices over time. 161 00:16:52,020 --> 00:16:56,969 And here I make an argument not just for the consideration of these kinds of sources in social history, 162 00:16:56,970 --> 00:17:03,150 but also intellectual history is the form of periodicals, magazines, journals, pamphlets. 163 00:17:03,510 --> 00:17:10,650 Because these give us a sense of the granular process by which ideas and practices emerge over time. 164 00:17:10,890 --> 00:17:13,260 And indeed, looking at periodicals in particular, 165 00:17:13,320 --> 00:17:23,280 help us understand how it comes to be that certain positions are canonised or made orthodox in the form of pamphlets that we get to process. 166 00:17:23,400 --> 00:17:30,480 We also can trace when Salafis are not talking about these issues in the clear ways that they later discuss them. 167 00:17:31,140 --> 00:17:33,180 Now, to tell the story, I focus on Egypt. 168 00:17:33,450 --> 00:17:40,920 But this is a story that draws heavily on sources from elsewhere in the Middle East, particularly from Syria, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. 169 00:17:41,190 --> 00:17:48,810 And in line with the fact that Solar Citizen is a transnational project defined not merely by what is going on locally, 170 00:17:48,990 --> 00:17:56,190 but also by a set of intellectual networks that are transnational networks of migration as well, particularly between Egypt and Saudi Arabia. 171 00:17:56,610 --> 00:17:59,640 So too does the book follow those paths of migration. 172 00:18:00,180 --> 00:18:08,550 And in the book, I make an argument about the origin of 40 Salafi practices one inches the second, the beard, 173 00:18:09,240 --> 00:18:15,630 the third gender segregation, and the fourth, the prohibition against letting one's robes hang down or expelled. 174 00:18:16,470 --> 00:18:27,480 And these four practices give us a story of the differing trajectories of production of prophetic practice and in the case of praying in shoes. 175 00:18:27,750 --> 00:18:31,860 In some respects is the most surprising trajectory we have, 176 00:18:31,860 --> 00:18:38,660 because this is a practice that in the forties and fifties is really valorised by leading members of Ansar Ahmadiyya. 177 00:18:38,940 --> 00:18:44,970 But in the face of political repression and social opprobrium, by the end of the 20th century, 178 00:18:45,390 --> 00:18:51,900 as soon as leaders are making arguments for why one should avoid engaging in this praiseworthy practice rather than performing it, 179 00:18:51,900 --> 00:18:58,950 which is not what one expects from Salafis. So the question then is how should we understand Salafism as a project? 180 00:18:58,980 --> 00:19:06,950 Where does it come from? Now, the Salafi self-understanding in this respect is that Salafism comes from the crown, but it directly derived from it. 181 00:19:07,350 --> 00:19:13,890 And we should take that self-understanding seriously. So we are deeply committed to these two textual purposes. 182 00:19:14,880 --> 00:19:16,080 But that's not enough. 183 00:19:16,620 --> 00:19:24,599 And in the book, I offer an argument that the linkage between ethics and visibility that I argue is at the centre of Salafi piety. 184 00:19:24,600 --> 00:19:34,170 In the 20th century, Middle East actually emerges from the 19th century modernising states and the role of uniforms and dress within that. 185 00:19:35,360 --> 00:19:45,920 And particularly here, I'm going to focus on Egypt and note the emergence in the 19th century of uniforms for both soldiers and students. 186 00:19:46,490 --> 00:19:50,690 And this is really indebted to the work of Khalid Fahmy in particular. 187 00:19:50,930 --> 00:19:55,610 And the point here is that in the mid-19th century, under the Ottoman and Egyptian state, 188 00:19:56,030 --> 00:20:01,460 it increasingly became the case that to participate in these state institutions when needed to dress in a certain way, 189 00:20:01,730 --> 00:20:08,840 and that dressing in that way was not merely a form of regulating individual practice. 190 00:20:09,050 --> 00:20:14,450 But it suggested you were on board with this project, that you were signalling with your clothing, 191 00:20:14,450 --> 00:20:17,660 your allegiance to a particular state, to a particular project. 192 00:20:18,410 --> 00:20:27,560 And this is something that we see persists under British colonial rule beginning in 1882 and then under colonial rule beginning in 1922. 193 00:20:27,920 --> 00:20:36,409 And here I just want to note a point that Tim Mitchell, it is classical colonising Egypt makes about the models of subject formation under 194 00:20:36,410 --> 00:20:40,330 colonial rule and specifically refers to something known as the politics of the self. 195 00:20:40,730 --> 00:20:48,320 So that this idea that Egyptians need to self-regulate in the service of a broader social whole about what they look like. 196 00:20:49,400 --> 00:20:54,740 Is it actually reflective or is assumed to be reflective of what they stand for? 197 00:20:55,040 --> 00:21:01,400 And part of what's so striking is that these understandings of the linkage between 198 00:21:01,640 --> 00:21:05,960 the allegiance or ethics and visibility carry over into the interwar period. 199 00:21:06,200 --> 00:21:08,180 And here I'll just give a very short example. 200 00:21:08,660 --> 00:21:17,780 In the 1930 in Egypt, we have a battle between various shirts movements, the blue shirts of the West, the green shirts of Young Egypt. 201 00:21:18,380 --> 00:21:26,030 We also have the broader emergence of India as a cultural category this middle class cultural, this middle cultural stratum. 202 00:21:26,720 --> 00:21:29,690 And to be an ascending is to wear a suit. 203 00:21:30,140 --> 00:21:38,810 And the Turkish and there's a great deal of discussion spilt over what it means to be an Efendi what it means to perform one's Efendi heard. 204 00:21:39,560 --> 00:21:43,220 Lucy Resolvers book is particularly fantastic in this regard. 205 00:21:44,330 --> 00:21:51,290 The point here is that we have this linkage between commitment to a particular cultural ideal and how one dresses, 206 00:21:51,590 --> 00:21:58,690 and indeed an assumption that how one dresses really brings home one's ideological commitment. 207 00:21:58,700 --> 00:22:03,320 So you're all note an episode from 1936 between young Egypt in the West. 208 00:22:03,440 --> 00:22:07,370 They were at this point had a pretty contentious relationship. 209 00:22:07,880 --> 00:22:11,840 The blue shirts and the green shirts were essentially their paramilitary organisations. 210 00:22:12,020 --> 00:22:19,310 And at some point in 1936, both was leadership says to its rank and file in the blue shirts, take off your shirts. 211 00:22:19,520 --> 00:22:25,069 We don't want to provoke Egypt at this point, which underscores the things, 212 00:22:25,070 --> 00:22:31,190 the symbolic centrality of wearing the blue shirts to ideological contestations during this period. 213 00:22:31,460 --> 00:22:38,990 It underscores this assumed linkage not only within the war, but between the West and Egypt of the linkage between ethics and visibility. 214 00:22:41,290 --> 00:22:44,919 So now we get to the topic that you actually were expecting to hear about. 215 00:22:44,920 --> 00:22:51,850 The Salafi fears, the origins of sort of the beginning of this talk are really, you know, walls around a fault. 216 00:22:52,690 --> 00:22:58,540 Now, part of what's interesting about the thirties and forties, this is a point that unrelated theory has made, 217 00:22:58,930 --> 00:23:05,410 is that under colonial rule, the dividing line is still between colonised and colonised, 218 00:23:05,440 --> 00:23:11,409 which overlaps but is not identical to a divide between Christians and Muslims because there are, 219 00:23:11,410 --> 00:23:14,140 of course, Coptic Christians in Egypt who are indigenous to Egypt. 220 00:23:14,410 --> 00:23:20,800 But in many ways this line between Muslim and Christian is a dividing line of the colonial project. 221 00:23:21,310 --> 00:23:26,490 And that's what's so interesting about the thirties and forties among Salafis is 222 00:23:26,500 --> 00:23:30,580 that there's very little discussion of what a distinctly Salafi period looks like. 223 00:23:30,790 --> 00:23:34,180 Instead, there's simply a discussion of the importance of growing a beard. 224 00:23:34,510 --> 00:23:38,380 And in 1948, the founder of On Social Media, Mohammad Hamida, 225 00:23:38,750 --> 00:23:44,470 is asked this question and essentially responds, You should grow the beer and let it become legible. 226 00:23:45,160 --> 00:23:49,690 That's his advice on what a proper Islamic period looks like growing. 227 00:23:49,860 --> 00:23:56,919 Let it become plentiful. You then expand on the fact that it serves not merely to distinguish Muslim men from Muslim women, 228 00:23:56,920 --> 00:24:01,120 but to distinguish Muslim men from their non-Muslim counterparts. 229 00:24:02,150 --> 00:24:06,260 So on the one hand, he's conscious of visible distinction, 230 00:24:06,770 --> 00:24:12,320 but he isn't yet concerned with making a linkage between necessarily between ethics and visibility. 231 00:24:12,530 --> 00:24:16,839 And he certainly hasn't specified the required length. Now, 232 00:24:16,840 --> 00:24:23,499 part of what makes this lack of specificity so interesting during this period is 233 00:24:23,500 --> 00:24:27,370 that the Muslim Brotherhood has a clear definition of the period at this time. 234 00:24:27,580 --> 00:24:30,640 And here I just want to show you three a picture of three men. 235 00:24:31,210 --> 00:24:40,630 First, Mohamed Hamza, the founder of the second Abdul Rahman al killed a leading figure with an unsustainable eventually becomes head. 236 00:24:41,020 --> 00:24:45,550 And the third one, I'm going to simply note something. Their beards are different. 237 00:24:45,730 --> 00:24:50,350 They look pretty similar. You couldn't tell one of the Salafi and one as an Islamist. 238 00:24:50,590 --> 00:24:56,190 This will soon change. Neither of us, typically or luckily, have anything close to the vest. 239 00:24:57,620 --> 00:25:04,610 Now, there's two reasons why this is interesting. The first is the process by which the Brotherhood articulate this model facial hair. 240 00:25:04,970 --> 00:25:13,310 And this comes from a 1944 article published in the Brotherhood's Journal When a muslim on a scholar by the name of say, 241 00:25:13,310 --> 00:25:20,150 etc., who later a couple of years later publishes the casino, which is this key legal text for the Brotherhood. 242 00:25:20,690 --> 00:25:26,390 And a setback makes the argument that men should grow their beard but not let it become excessive, 243 00:25:26,690 --> 00:25:31,400 that the moderation that was that was a is the best in all matters. 244 00:25:32,030 --> 00:25:35,090 Now, this is clearly adopted by the business, 245 00:25:35,510 --> 00:25:42,800 but part of what's so interesting here is not simply that acerbic takes this particular view, but the source that he uses to justify it. 246 00:25:43,490 --> 00:25:53,389 So so if he claims to the fist as a peer, as the minimum length for a beard, contrary to ideas about even Omar going, there hasn't been. 247 00:25:53,390 --> 00:25:58,130 Omar used to trim his beard to a minimum of this before going on his own. 248 00:25:58,580 --> 00:25:59,780 Okay. That's right. 249 00:26:00,260 --> 00:26:07,850 Now, what's fascinating is this is later used by Salafis, but here it's used by say it's there to argue that one can trim the beard. 250 00:26:08,060 --> 00:26:13,610 He completely ignores the fitness measurements and he focuses on the practice of trimming the beard, 251 00:26:13,850 --> 00:26:19,729 which again, further underscores the limits of literalism as an approach to the corpus generally, 252 00:26:19,730 --> 00:26:26,990 to Salafism in particular, because here we have two radically different understandings of this particular Hadith report. 253 00:26:27,890 --> 00:26:33,740 Now, we also might note that it is during the subsequent period that the cost of growing a beard increased substantially. 254 00:26:34,220 --> 00:26:44,000 And here we might move from the thirties and forties to the post 1952 period, particularly the point after 1954 when Gamal Abdel Nasser is in power. 255 00:26:44,450 --> 00:26:54,470 Unequivocally, before that it was him then Mohammed Libya, in which we see the emergence of a major crackdown of serious repression of the Brotherhood 256 00:26:54,770 --> 00:27:00,570 after an attempted assassination of Abdel Nasser by a couple of members of the organisation. 257 00:27:00,590 --> 00:27:06,680 And this is essentially used as a pretext for cracking down on the organisation more broadly. 258 00:27:07,280 --> 00:27:12,250 And it's during this period that the beard becomes a target of repression, 259 00:27:12,830 --> 00:27:18,920 that we have these memoirs of the Muslim Brothers from this period who describe how when they were in prison, 260 00:27:18,920 --> 00:27:25,010 particularly in the military prison, the society, their beards were shaved off in the top of their head. 261 00:27:25,010 --> 00:27:35,110 Hair was off, their head was shaved off. And there's also a speech that Abdel Nasser gave in 1966 in the Delta textile town of the mahalla, 262 00:27:35,120 --> 00:27:41,600 a cobra in which he identified those who grow beards with the enemies of Egypt. 263 00:27:41,630 --> 00:27:50,420 And here I want to read this particular quote. Someone who grows out his beard comes to you and says that socialism is disbelieving. 264 00:27:51,470 --> 00:27:57,530 Someone who claims that socialism opposes religion is the person who will take the country's wealth for themselves. 265 00:27:58,040 --> 00:28:03,710 Now, this claim was clearly directed at the Muslim Brotherhood, but it certainly wasn't limited to them. 266 00:28:04,040 --> 00:28:10,400 So it's unsurprising in this context that we don't see the development of a distinctly Salafi conception of the beard. 267 00:28:10,640 --> 00:28:16,910 These social consequences during this period are too high, the cost of repression is too high. 268 00:28:17,030 --> 00:28:22,040 The risk of repression of being even associated with the Brotherhood is significant. 269 00:28:22,430 --> 00:28:28,150 And this challenge of association is something that will come up also in the 1980s. 270 00:28:29,280 --> 00:28:35,420 All right. So this brings us to the 1970s, to the rise of Abdel Nasser successor, Mohamed Al Gore. 271 00:28:35,620 --> 00:28:40,020 So that's the rise of a broader Islamic revival in Egypt during this period, 272 00:28:40,260 --> 00:28:49,620 which involved not just Islamist movements such as the Brotherhood, the Jamal Sharia or Ansar al-Sunna, not just the Islamic student movement, 273 00:28:49,620 --> 00:28:54,329 the Jamaat e Islami, but also state institutions such as the Ministry of Endowments, 274 00:28:54,330 --> 00:29:01,470 particularly the Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs, as well as the Islamic Research Academy at Al-Azhar University. 275 00:29:01,710 --> 00:29:08,040 But what I want to focus on here is a particular aspect of activism during this period, namely that of the Jamaat e Islami. 276 00:29:08,220 --> 00:29:15,270 And here you can see an image of Jamaat e Islami aid celebrations from the late 1970s or early 1980s. 277 00:29:15,690 --> 00:29:21,750 And here I simply wanted to note two things. One is that many, but not all of these men have bushy beards. 278 00:29:23,000 --> 00:29:30,500 The second is that many of them are wearing the Jedediah, which is a longstanding feature of Egyptian dress in the countryside, 279 00:29:30,740 --> 00:29:36,290 but was repurposed in the 1970s as a neo traditional marker of authenticity. 280 00:29:36,590 --> 00:29:43,610 But really, I want you to focus on something in particular about the gender, namely that these gender beards do not appear. 281 00:29:43,730 --> 00:29:49,250 The men wearing these jobs do not appear to be observing the prohibition against letting one's robes hang down, 282 00:29:49,700 --> 00:29:53,180 which would require that the other be a cease and the ankle. 283 00:29:53,570 --> 00:30:02,750 It doesn't for the most part. So here we have further hints that the prohibition against Isobel has not quite been revived yet. 284 00:30:02,780 --> 00:30:06,020 No, some members of the Jamaat e Islami end up joining the Brotherhood. 285 00:30:06,470 --> 00:30:11,750 So the question of Isobel wouldn't be an issue here, but many of them end up joining Ansar Mohammed here. 286 00:30:12,350 --> 00:30:17,120 And what's so striking is that Isobel doesn't seem to be in effect here yet either. 287 00:30:18,530 --> 00:30:22,790 Now in this period, there's this broader challenge for some elephants, 288 00:30:23,000 --> 00:30:28,280 namely the association of these bushy, bearded men with violence both within and beyond Egypt. 289 00:30:28,850 --> 00:30:38,479 In the case of within Egypt. We have the example of the upper Egyptian branches of the Jamaat e Islami engaging in 290 00:30:38,480 --> 00:30:43,790 coercive enforcement of the Islamic obligation of commanding right and forbidding wrong. 291 00:30:43,790 --> 00:30:49,040 Do three levels to this obligation by, you know, in one's heart, by tongue and by hand. 292 00:30:49,340 --> 00:30:52,010 And they are choosing to engage in the first, 293 00:30:52,430 --> 00:30:59,330 which is in many respects actually not really reflective of how this duty has been understood historically. 294 00:30:59,960 --> 00:31:06,260 Because if we were to look at Michael Cook's magisterial work and the duty to command right and forbidden wrong, 295 00:31:06,470 --> 00:31:14,480 we very much see that the coercive enforcement of this duty in Islamic history almost exclusively is identified with state authorities, 296 00:31:14,720 --> 00:31:20,750 in part because it is such a double edged sword, powerful mode of social regulation. 297 00:31:20,990 --> 00:31:23,930 But it can also lead to incredible infighting. 298 00:31:26,150 --> 00:31:31,610 It's also the case, though, that there's the association of bushy, bearded men with violence outside of Egypt. 299 00:31:31,610 --> 00:31:41,640 And here we come to 1979 to the attack on the Grand Mosque of Mecca by the Jamal or the Salafi group that commands right and wrong. 300 00:31:41,660 --> 00:31:53,270 It does happen. And part of what's so striking about the attack on the Grand Mosque, the Mecca, is not simply that they were wearing bushy beards now. 301 00:31:53,270 --> 00:31:57,649 It's simply that some of them actually appeared to have properly Salafi beards that 302 00:31:57,650 --> 00:32:02,300 we can see trimmed moustaches among some many of the men who have been arrested. 303 00:32:02,630 --> 00:32:06,070 But also the fact of how they are then understood. 304 00:32:06,140 --> 00:32:14,630 And here I'm quoting from a newspaper interview with Salman bin Abdulaziz in a Saudi newspaper from 1980. 305 00:32:14,840 --> 00:32:17,960 Now, so men bin Abdulaziz is the current king at this point. 306 00:32:18,200 --> 00:32:22,970 He was the governor of Riyadh, is, of course, the father of Mohammed bin Salman. 307 00:32:23,450 --> 00:32:30,290 And he explained at this time in this interview in a Saudi newspaper, I spent a lot of time reading Saudi newspapers from this period. 308 00:32:30,860 --> 00:32:37,670 He explains that the problem with the JAMA Festival was not simply that they were present there, 309 00:32:38,410 --> 00:32:43,670 that it was also that they were hiding under the name of Salafism. 310 00:32:44,540 --> 00:32:52,610 Some associate that the issue was not simply their engagement in violence and that they resemble herders, 311 00:32:52,940 --> 00:32:55,940 but that they were laying claim to the mantle of Salafism. 312 00:32:57,000 --> 00:33:03,900 So this brings us to the late 1970s, and particularly to Saudi Arabia, 313 00:33:04,140 --> 00:33:11,610 but to the role of a certain Egyptian in Saudi Arabia by a man named Ahmed Ali Taha, the man who actually passed away recently. 314 00:33:11,790 --> 00:33:19,200 Now, the man had received his Ph.D. at Eisenhart in 1973 and had gone to Imam to teach. 315 00:33:19,470 --> 00:33:24,660 From 77 to 81 at the Islamic University in Virginia was in some sense this fascinating 316 00:33:24,660 --> 00:33:30,030 intellectual meeting point of activists and thinkers throughout the Middle East and South Asia. 317 00:33:30,870 --> 00:33:34,589 It had many South Asian Muslim scholars and activists. 318 00:33:34,590 --> 00:33:38,100 There had many Arab Muslim scholars and activists there. 319 00:33:39,260 --> 00:33:40,850 Now, what I'm interested in, though, 320 00:33:41,030 --> 00:33:49,760 is a series of articles that Ryan wrote in the Official Journal of the Islamic University of Medina in the late 1970s. 321 00:33:50,150 --> 00:33:58,040 And in the first of these two articles, he laid out the Hadith narrations regarding the necessity of growing the beards, 322 00:33:58,370 --> 00:34:06,240 and specifically here stating that these narrations about the practices that orient one to God is not the sin of the situation. 323 00:34:06,410 --> 00:34:12,860 And one of the Hadith approaches he cited included both growing the beard and trimming the moustache. 324 00:34:13,220 --> 00:34:15,320 Okay, so he's foregrounding the beard. Great. 325 00:34:15,350 --> 00:34:22,400 But what he also does, which is so interesting to us, is he introduces in Salafi circles or as a solo scholar. 326 00:34:22,800 --> 00:34:27,920 The first time I could find a real discussion of the question of the minimum length of the beard, 327 00:34:28,340 --> 00:34:32,730 and he asks the question, Should the beard be a minimum of one cup an hour to cover a cup of the type? 328 00:34:33,200 --> 00:34:39,709 And he argues that it should be one contribute to a minimum of a fist to the extent that it 329 00:34:39,710 --> 00:34:46,910 serves a man's distinguished bearing and that those who reject any form of trimming the. 330 00:34:47,980 --> 00:34:56,080 They really risk it becoming frightening and that there's a real concern that this will look uncouth, that it will look frightening, 331 00:34:56,920 --> 00:35:04,930 and that the proper beard allows Muslim men to not just represent their party, but to represent their masculinity. 332 00:35:05,350 --> 00:35:12,580 So we here have the fist as a measurement. We also have a real concern with visibility of what it looks like. 333 00:35:13,000 --> 00:35:16,570 It's not simply a question of reflection of internal state. 334 00:35:16,900 --> 00:35:20,620 There's a real social performance aspect here to. 335 00:35:21,750 --> 00:35:27,930 But part of what's so striking about Adrian is how much of a minority voice he is during this period. 336 00:35:28,320 --> 00:35:35,310 We have a series of pamphlets written by Salafi scholars from the late seventies through mid 1980s, 337 00:35:35,700 --> 00:35:40,350 and we have no evidence here of a consensus on the fist as a minimal measure. 338 00:35:41,040 --> 00:35:49,170 We have a 1982 pamphlet by a serious Salafi Osman bin Abdelkader or something that says nothing about the length of the period. 339 00:35:49,830 --> 00:35:56,940 We have a 1984 work by a Jordanian, Salafi and student of Muhammad Nasr, Beni Ali al-Harbi, 340 00:35:57,180 --> 00:36:03,270 that states that the beard stretches, quote, from the hair below the lower lip to the hair that grows under the chin. 341 00:36:04,610 --> 00:36:06,890 This trend also extends to Saudi Arabia. 342 00:36:07,190 --> 00:36:14,870 In a 1985 pamphlet, the Saudi scholar Hamoud al-Zawahiri notes that the Prophet Mohammed had a thick spear, that he was cut. 343 00:36:16,190 --> 00:36:21,810 Indeed, even Abdulaziz even best doesn't mention a minimal length of the beard. 344 00:36:21,830 --> 00:36:25,940 In a 1983 ruling in the Kuwaiti Islamist magazine. 345 00:36:26,210 --> 00:36:34,640 Mr. So the fist is not yet standard among Salafis across the Middle East and indeed in of 1986. 346 00:36:34,640 --> 00:36:40,310 But whether the then head of Ansar al-Sunna, Mohammed Zia mohammed, Ali Abdul Rahim. 347 00:36:40,340 --> 00:36:47,420 Note that it's forbidden to shave the beard, yet doesn't specify whether one can commit and if so, to what extent. 348 00:36:48,320 --> 00:36:55,630 There is, however, an Egyptian Salafi during this period that makes it clear statement about the fist and that is Mohammed bin Ismail. 349 00:36:56,750 --> 00:37:01,210 What this point is a second tier figure in the Egyptian society. 350 00:37:01,460 --> 00:37:08,750 He later becomes much more important owing to his founding role in the CIA or some of the court in Alexandria. 351 00:37:09,020 --> 00:37:10,370 But in the mid 1980s, 352 00:37:10,490 --> 00:37:19,580 he is very much in the second tier and argues that the question is whether one should trim the beard to a minimum of a fist or two fists, 353 00:37:19,970 --> 00:37:26,390 and that the most appropriate solution is that the beard not exceed this in order to avoid excess. 354 00:37:27,140 --> 00:37:34,600 But what's really striking here is that apart from a look at them, we have no evidence that the beard is the standard measurement, 355 00:37:34,610 --> 00:37:39,650 while a decade later it will very clearly be the standard measurements. 356 00:37:41,080 --> 00:37:47,560 So the question then becomes what happens? What happens between the 1980s and the 1990? 357 00:37:48,980 --> 00:37:55,340 And to understand this, we need to think about the religio political scene in Egypt in the second half of the eighties, 358 00:37:55,610 --> 00:37:58,340 namely the role of jihadi groups, 359 00:37:58,700 --> 00:38:08,540 most of whom were not so fussy in targeting civilian populations and state institutions, in assassinating ministers and journalists alike. 360 00:38:09,620 --> 00:38:18,440 Now the problem here is the bushy bearded man problem, namely that you have Salafis with their bushy beard as you have. 361 00:38:18,710 --> 00:38:24,440 You had the jihadi groups whose members support bushy beard, and they're hard to distinguish. 362 00:38:24,710 --> 00:38:32,990 And so what we start to hear from Saleh from this period is this problem of getting hauled in with the jihadis because they look like them. 363 00:38:33,050 --> 00:38:41,470 This is the problem of state security services. And here we have a 1987 article, an editorial in Ansar Assuntos mouthpiece Tawhid, 364 00:38:41,750 --> 00:38:49,340 in which the journal the editor events his frustration that in the aftermath of incidents of terror and violence in Cairo and he uses those terms, 365 00:38:49,610 --> 00:38:50,659 writers have, quote, 366 00:38:50,660 --> 00:39:00,110 sought to make people fear every bearded man accusing those who wear the beard and the long road robe or that the beb of terrorism. 367 00:39:00,830 --> 00:39:08,870 This is also echoed in Saudi publications, particularly in a band which is affiliated with the Saudi Sahwa or Awakening movement. 368 00:39:09,260 --> 00:39:15,140 And in a 1987 article in that journal and author wrote an article titled Where Is Egypt Going? 369 00:39:15,560 --> 00:39:19,760 And noted the increasing popularity of the beard and the long road in Egypt. 370 00:39:20,210 --> 00:39:25,130 And he complained that proponents of jihad in Egypt were not necessarily Salafi. 371 00:39:26,190 --> 00:39:36,690 So to come back to the anecdote that I opened with of Ahmed Nasser and announcing what it means to be Sunni, we have got a visibility problem. 372 00:39:37,410 --> 00:39:43,649 We've got a problem that Salafis are not visibly distinct from their non Salafi counterparts. 373 00:39:43,650 --> 00:39:48,780 And that happens to be the case that those counterparts are coming in for significant repression from 374 00:39:48,780 --> 00:39:55,499 state security agencies and that quite a few Salafis are not terribly happy about being dragged along, 375 00:39:55,500 --> 00:40:03,659 and understandably so. It's also during this period that we see the emergence of the third as a condition of being a Salafi. 376 00:40:03,660 --> 00:40:06,810 And here there's two fatwas that I want to bring to the story. 377 00:40:07,230 --> 00:40:15,150 One is a fatwa that was issued in response to a letter from a student at the School of Maritime Transportation in Egypt. 378 00:40:16,350 --> 00:40:17,520 And it's to Abdulaziz Aziz. 379 00:40:17,520 --> 00:40:25,920 And it basically explains that the School of Maritime Transportation requires that student say, what should this student do? 380 00:40:26,700 --> 00:40:33,989 The beard is obligatory. So what should you do? Is in the school, he is facing the coercive power of the Egyptian state, 381 00:40:33,990 --> 00:40:41,820 particularly of a set of regulations that also apply for the military and says, listen, we're going to try to sidestep the problem. 382 00:40:43,210 --> 00:40:50,260 Get me a letter certifying your religious commitment as a skier from the head of our son, Mohammed Ali Abdul Rahim. 383 00:40:50,470 --> 00:40:55,240 And we will help you transfer to a Saudi university such as the Islamic University. 384 00:40:56,290 --> 00:41:04,150 By contrast, there's another such request from 1988 as well to stymie another major Saudi summit. 385 00:41:04,930 --> 00:41:11,800 You've been able to say me in takes, what one might say says the less accommodationist approach. 386 00:41:12,460 --> 00:41:17,980 His first request you get is from a conscript in the Egyptian army asking what should he do? 387 00:41:18,580 --> 00:41:28,629 And instructs him that the entirety of the army's lower ranks should disobey their superiors and should instruct them that, 388 00:41:28,630 --> 00:41:35,320 quote, This sin is the reason for the failure and defeat of Arab armies here to Israel. 389 00:41:36,290 --> 00:41:47,660 So this time is not providing a workaround, let's say, and is, you know, potentially exposing the folks who listen to him to significant consequences. 390 00:41:48,350 --> 00:41:54,290 Now, in this context, once our son has had Muhammad Ali Abdul Rahim offer something of an offering, 391 00:41:54,710 --> 00:42:02,030 and he argues that while growing the beard is indeed obligatory, such an obligation is not absolute. 392 00:42:02,360 --> 00:42:08,479 And in those instances in which the, quote, discord caused by growing a beard is greater than that from shaving it, 393 00:42:08,480 --> 00:42:12,110 the invocation of fitna here in shaving is permissible. 394 00:42:12,440 --> 00:42:17,580 So there are extenuating circumstances that can justify shaping the beard. 395 00:42:18,170 --> 00:42:24,530 But even this argument for extenuating circumstances underscores this broader shift that the 396 00:42:24,530 --> 00:42:32,000 beard has become a crucial aspect of what it means to be absolutely a non-negotiable condition. 397 00:42:32,360 --> 00:42:37,640 So that then to negotiate an exception, you need to create extenuating circumstances. 398 00:42:38,870 --> 00:42:41,480 So by the mid 1990s, 399 00:42:41,840 --> 00:42:52,670 the consensus that a Salafi beard was distinguished by a fist length at a minimum and a trimmed moustache was the norm, not the exception. 400 00:42:53,940 --> 00:43:01,169 But in 1995, we find a heated debate on the topic of the beard between Ibn Bez and Mohammed Nasreddin, 401 00:43:01,170 --> 00:43:06,390 although many said two of the three heavyweights of cell to have both beating scholars. 402 00:43:07,260 --> 00:43:10,200 The issue at hand is whether one can trim the beard. 403 00:43:10,830 --> 00:43:19,530 IBN does argues that the obligation to grow the period is absolute, whereas al-Banna argues that it is permissible to trim it up to exist, 404 00:43:19,680 --> 00:43:28,259 and that claiming that it's impermissible to trim it is constitutes bizarre idiocy or additional innovation, 405 00:43:28,260 --> 00:43:38,070 which is to say a requirement added on to a legitimate act of worship that is not actually based in legitimate texts, 406 00:43:38,280 --> 00:43:42,120 that the act of worship is required, but the additional requirement is illegitimate. 407 00:43:42,300 --> 00:43:48,780 Now, needless to say, lobbing a charge of bid of any form in Salafi circles is really. 408 00:43:49,860 --> 00:43:56,879 Those are fighting words. But leaving that fight aside, what we can know is that despite their differences, 409 00:43:56,880 --> 00:44:02,670 if in bed and other than to agree that the fist is the minimal measure, the fist is the reference point. 410 00:44:02,970 --> 00:44:08,990 Whereas. Just a decade prior, there was no such consensus. 411 00:44:09,010 --> 00:44:16,070 It was just Mohammed bin Ismail. So what's the significance of this story? 412 00:44:16,100 --> 00:44:24,530 How are we to understand self instead of his claim to replicate the golden model of the Prophet Muhammad's community in seventh century Arabia? 413 00:44:24,920 --> 00:44:33,560 Put differently, what does it mean to cite the past? How does citation involve a process of textual and social reconstruction? 414 00:44:34,070 --> 00:44:37,730 And what are the assumptions that undergird this project now? 415 00:44:37,850 --> 00:44:43,460 So is it claims to continuity with the seventh century casts light on this movement so understanding. 416 00:44:44,300 --> 00:44:47,930 But they tell us very little about its origins or development. 417 00:44:48,650 --> 00:44:50,810 In this talk and in the book more broadly, 418 00:44:51,200 --> 00:44:58,910 I show not only that Salafism is a project best understood in terms of the ideological contestation of the 20th century, 419 00:44:59,120 --> 00:45:02,810 but also that its defining logic of its social practices. 420 00:45:03,140 --> 00:45:03,799 Specifically, 421 00:45:03,800 --> 00:45:14,570 this linkage between ethics and visible self regulation are inextricably linked to the emergence of powerful states and modern mass societies. 422 00:45:15,110 --> 00:45:25,280 Far from politicising daily life. So this is a response to the politicisation of daily life by offering a distinctly modern ethics of communication. 423 00:45:26,030 --> 00:45:32,960 At the same time, though, such projects are often incomplete or ambiguous, as I argue in the book, more broadly, 424 00:45:33,380 --> 00:45:42,560 multiple practices must be performed simultaneously, precisely because of concern with individual practices of facial hair, store pretence or gender. 425 00:45:42,560 --> 00:45:45,410 Segregation is not exclusive to Salafism, 426 00:45:45,740 --> 00:45:51,650 and because practices that distinguish Salafis in one country may not serve that function in another country. 427 00:45:52,780 --> 00:46:01,960 No. An emphasis on practice also reveals the material and perceptual conditions that have transformed Islamic scholarly reasoning in the 20th century, 428 00:46:02,320 --> 00:46:08,830 building on previous scholarship that dissects the subtle yet significant transformations of longstanding tools. 429 00:46:09,700 --> 00:46:19,180 And here, I think, for example, Ginette Kadri's wonderful recent book on Sheikh Mohammed and of course, Customs A Man's Series of works. 430 00:46:19,960 --> 00:46:30,190 This book explores practices of citation as they are transmitted through Islamic print media and embodied by men and women in daily practices. 431 00:46:30,670 --> 00:46:35,440 My emphasis on Salafism as a project of social reconstruction and textual 432 00:46:35,440 --> 00:46:41,139 reconstruction your own ostensibly straightforward textual approach also challenged. 433 00:46:41,140 --> 00:46:46,390 This challenges the assumption, sometimes implicit, other times explicit that. 434 00:46:47,430 --> 00:46:57,090 Contemporary Islamic movements rely on a model of embodied practice that is continuous in its CoreLogic with a premodern Islamic ethical tradition. 435 00:46:57,630 --> 00:47:05,430 This approach was prominent in the scholarship on the Anthropology of Islam valuably cast light on engagement with pre-modern religious texts. 436 00:47:05,820 --> 00:47:12,690 Yet the story of Salafi piety generally in social practice in particular reveals how 437 00:47:12,690 --> 00:47:18,420 the citation of past authorities is not necessarily a historically continuous act. 438 00:47:18,870 --> 00:47:24,959 As such, I argue that contemporary forms of Islamic piety are shaped primarily by the 439 00:47:24,960 --> 00:47:29,370 communicative conditions of modernity and the social world of the participants, 440 00:47:29,610 --> 00:47:33,630 and only secondarily by this discursive Islamic ethical tradition. 441 00:47:35,360 --> 00:47:35,749 Finally, 442 00:47:35,750 --> 00:47:43,880 this is the story of Islamic law that relies on media sources that are generally considered secondary to understanding the development of Islamic law. 443 00:47:44,750 --> 00:47:53,240 Now, previous studies that foreground such landmark religious texts valuably illustrate the end point of religious debates. 444 00:47:53,630 --> 00:47:59,090 But they don't necessarily tell us as much about the granular process, the ideological contestation, 445 00:47:59,090 --> 00:48:06,320 not merely within a given movement, but among movements that periodicals and pamphlets allow us to reveal. 446 00:48:07,310 --> 00:48:14,180 Some of my focus here is on the power of tracing the process by which legal rulings emerge through periodicals 447 00:48:14,180 --> 00:48:21,530 and pamphlets to understanding some of these what are perceived to be more highbrow questions of Islamic law. 448 00:48:22,010 --> 00:48:28,700 Now, I've covered a lot here, so I'm going to leave it at that. I want to thank Osama again for hosting and moderating. 449 00:48:28,700 --> 00:48:32,330 And I look forward to the questions and conversation that will follow. 450 00:48:33,200 --> 00:48:40,609 Thank you so much, Aaron. That was really sort of a wonderful and broad overview of actually in some respects, 451 00:48:40,610 --> 00:48:45,620 one main theme of your book, because there are so many of the themes you listed for at the beginning. 452 00:48:45,620 --> 00:48:50,360 So I guess it's a message to all the attendees that if you want to get the full picture, 453 00:48:50,430 --> 00:48:53,870 get your hands on the book, and I'm certainly going to be reading the rest of it. 454 00:48:54,770 --> 00:48:59,420 I've got so many questions for you, Aaron, but I'm just going to ask you one to start off with. 455 00:49:00,230 --> 00:49:09,620 You refer to Jeannette Kadri's fantastic recent work and the contrast that he presents between sort of the ruptures of modernity, 456 00:49:09,860 --> 00:49:11,089 transformations of tradition, 457 00:49:11,090 --> 00:49:19,160 as it were, verses the Zaydi and Mahmoud in school of basically saying, Well, there's this continuity and that's what we want to focus on. 458 00:49:19,580 --> 00:49:25,780 And I, I haven't sort of read Jeanette's work carefully enough to really come to a conclusion, 459 00:49:26,540 --> 00:49:32,479 but my initial impulse is to say that at what point is something a break with 460 00:49:32,480 --> 00:49:37,910 tradition that is so distinctive that it really deserves that sort of name. 461 00:49:38,240 --> 00:49:46,280 And I look at the way in which we're thinking about groups like Salafism, which I think you very helpfully identify, have these social dimensions. 462 00:49:46,430 --> 00:49:52,820 There are group dynamics that arise from wider social forces and indeed political forces, the emergence of the nation state and so on. 463 00:49:53,810 --> 00:49:59,150 To what extent is that different, for example, in the pre-modern world to the emergence of the hub as a phenomenon? 464 00:49:59,450 --> 00:50:02,719 Right. That's such a radical transformation. 465 00:50:02,720 --> 00:50:09,049 One could argue that we're no longer really referring to sort of the Koran. 466 00:50:09,050 --> 00:50:15,500 And sooner or as we sort of might know in the early period about the transformation 467 00:50:15,500 --> 00:50:22,010 from the localised sinners of various states with a canonisation of Islamic law, 468 00:50:22,010 --> 00:50:25,460 as Shamsi is nicely put it. 469 00:50:25,880 --> 00:50:33,100 And so yeah, I kind of that's one of the things that makes me wonder is it a case of processions, 470 00:50:33,410 --> 00:50:38,570 so to speak, like things are actually just happening the way they always have been on some level? 471 00:50:39,360 --> 00:50:51,290 Well, so I think actually the example of this transition to the mass system and the adoption of the method of the paucity of a whole Hadiths critique 472 00:50:51,890 --> 00:51:02,030 of local rulings and this but this real reliance on the Hadith corpus as the basis for decision making is a really interesting parallel. 473 00:51:02,300 --> 00:51:09,140 Now, in some sense, I think this transformation we're seeing in the context of modernity is as momentous as that. 474 00:51:10,040 --> 00:51:14,450 Right now, the question of whether the more things change, the more they stay the same. 475 00:51:15,530 --> 00:51:21,470 It's certainly the case that we have these kinds of developments in pre-modern Islamic history. 476 00:51:22,000 --> 00:51:22,110 I mean, 477 00:51:22,160 --> 00:51:34,459 I think works such as tonight is a really helpful helping of a think of almost a post must have world or a world in which methods continue to exist. 478 00:51:34,460 --> 00:51:39,680 I mean he calls this uses the term the trans regional method in which they continue to exist, 479 00:51:39,680 --> 00:51:45,080 but they don't have the same social, political and institutional weight. 480 00:51:46,350 --> 00:51:56,220 And I think the scholarship in some sense is still trying to figure out how to make sense of how that has shaped Islamic thought in practice. 481 00:51:56,820 --> 00:52:01,590 I think another really important shift is the nationalisation of religious authority. 482 00:52:02,040 --> 00:52:05,699 The fact that we have, for example, in 1895, the richest in Egypt of a state, 483 00:52:05,700 --> 00:52:12,450 we'll see the emergence of expertise as the model for authority and so forth. 484 00:52:12,870 --> 00:52:19,500 We've got this really momentous intellectual and social shifts of modernity and also political shifts, of course. 485 00:52:19,710 --> 00:52:27,940 And the question then is how do we make sense of what are the stakes of making sense of them in terms of this longer Islamic tradition? 486 00:52:27,960 --> 00:52:33,270 Because, look, I went down the Islamic studies rabbit hole precisely so I could ask the question not merely of what's different, 487 00:52:33,270 --> 00:52:40,080 but also what is simpler. And what's so striking about the Salafis when we think about their project of reconstruction, 488 00:52:40,830 --> 00:52:46,680 is that they cite a series of Hadith reports in talking about social distinction. 489 00:52:47,730 --> 00:52:52,950 They cite a series of have these reports that are primarily premised on distinguishing Muslims from non-Muslim. 490 00:52:52,950 --> 00:52:57,990 And in some countries, it's about distinguishing yourself from the Jews, the Christians, the Zoroastrians. 491 00:52:58,560 --> 00:53:05,880 Now, the challenge in the post-colonial period is not Muslim non-Muslim distinction, it's Muslim Muslims, it's internal self differentiation. 492 00:53:06,210 --> 00:53:14,760 And in some respects, that makes the Hadith corpus a starting point, but only a starting point for these practices of social distinction, 493 00:53:15,180 --> 00:53:23,760 that the question of internal Muslim distinction are really not present in the corpus in a way that is accessible to Salafis. 494 00:53:24,300 --> 00:53:28,440 So we can draw out the continuity of the pre-modern tradition, probably construct. 495 00:53:28,800 --> 00:53:34,140 We can even draw out the ways in which aspects of the Salafi project draw on that. 496 00:53:34,830 --> 00:53:46,379 What I would say, though, is that there's a danger in making too great a claim to continuity, because the danger is not merely that. 497 00:53:46,380 --> 00:53:53,550 It obscures the extent to which to which Salafis are doing things in very different ways. 498 00:53:53,880 --> 00:54:04,490 And the internal M.O. of Salafism as a project is that they are similar to their ideological adversaries, such as secular nationalists or Islamists. 499 00:54:04,770 --> 00:54:09,089 So the fact that all of them are concerned with visible visibility, 500 00:54:09,090 --> 00:54:13,770 that they're all concerned with beards, they all have the claim about facial hair is not a coincidence. 501 00:54:14,070 --> 00:54:18,360 It's a reflection that they are all emerging in the shadow of the modernising Egyptian state. 502 00:54:19,260 --> 00:54:23,339 But I also think that one of the benefits of foregrounding the ruptures of the 20th 503 00:54:23,340 --> 00:54:27,000 century is it allows us to think comparatively without the religious traditions. 504 00:54:27,330 --> 00:54:34,530 And here and this is something I talk about in the book, I really think with a 1994 article by Soloveitchik, 505 00:54:34,560 --> 00:54:43,110 who is a scholar at Yeshiva University in New York City, which is the flagship the academic flagship of modern Orthodox Judaism. 506 00:54:43,740 --> 00:54:47,590 He's also the son of Joseph Stalin, who, along with ROUDEBUSH, 507 00:54:47,610 --> 00:54:54,300 a place seen as one of the two sort of towering figures of modern Orthodox Judaism in the 20th century red states. 508 00:54:54,480 --> 00:55:00,030 Now there's this article that the younger self wrote in the Jewish tradition in 1984, 509 00:55:00,270 --> 00:55:10,230 in which he identifies the increasing stringency of Orthodox and ultra-Orthodox Haredim Jewish communities over the course of the 20th century. 510 00:55:10,680 --> 00:55:18,150 And he does it through a particular legal question of the requisite amount of food required to perform certain commandments, 511 00:55:18,870 --> 00:55:20,550 perform certain religious obligations. 512 00:55:20,760 --> 00:55:30,810 But essentially what he shows is that the religious the stringency accepted by pious orthodox and ultra orthodox Jews by the end of the 20th century, 513 00:55:31,650 --> 00:55:43,020 would have made their predecessors, their pious predecessors, as it were, in the early 20th century, lacks to take the tradition seriously. 514 00:55:43,590 --> 00:55:44,760 The question is why? 515 00:55:45,030 --> 00:55:57,180 And here we can discover some real parallels with some in the he identifies the spread of print and the normative power of modern science. 516 00:55:57,390 --> 00:56:00,450 And so we think about why it's so important to be precise. 517 00:56:00,780 --> 00:56:03,860 First of all, Salafis aren't the only Muslims who care about being precise. 518 00:56:03,870 --> 00:56:11,610 It's worth stating that. It is also the case that this debate over precision among all Muslims, especially Salafis, 519 00:56:11,850 --> 00:56:19,530 is crucially inflected by the idea that it's precise practice that is most legitimate and that comes from the norm, 520 00:56:19,650 --> 00:56:23,070 the emergence of the normative documents of modern science. 521 00:56:23,460 --> 00:56:33,480 We also might say that while the rupture of Soloveitchik story is a rupture in some sense of migration to the United States and the Holocaust, 522 00:56:33,840 --> 00:56:39,840 the rupture of the Salafi story of the Egyptian story is the fall of the caliphate, 523 00:56:40,200 --> 00:56:45,630 the decline of the modern system, and a new set of questions that come to be. 524 00:56:46,360 --> 00:56:48,670 In the context of a post-colonial state. 525 00:56:49,180 --> 00:56:58,930 And so part of the reason I argue for thinking about the 20th century isn't simply because that's where the material left me, 526 00:56:59,110 --> 00:57:04,510 but mostly because it really opens up, analytically speaking, so exciting comparative angles, 527 00:57:04,750 --> 00:57:10,360 because then some of these are taken out of this box where Salafism is explanatory in terms of 528 00:57:10,360 --> 00:57:17,110 Salafism or even a boxed of this exceptional Middle East or Islam to a broader global perspective. 529 00:57:17,380 --> 00:57:20,650 Right. Fantastic. Thank you. A really comprehensive answer. 530 00:57:20,660 --> 00:57:25,360 And it's sort of also generated actually a question. 531 00:57:25,360 --> 00:57:30,549 And I hope the sort of earlier question is, well, indulge me if I go to the second question, 532 00:57:30,550 --> 00:57:36,430 because actually directly responds to or sort of asks you to expand your analogy, 533 00:57:36,440 --> 00:57:44,860 you did an interesting analogy with Orthodox Judaism and the Heretic movement in in I guess, North America, but it probably extends beyond that. 534 00:57:45,460 --> 00:57:49,810 And someone is asking you to maybe test the limits of your knowledge by asking 535 00:57:49,810 --> 00:57:53,720 is there a parallel or similarity with Christian sects in Europe to Salafism? 536 00:57:53,740 --> 00:58:01,180 What is your opinion? I you know, one of the important things I have learned in doing a few things, you know, 537 00:58:01,180 --> 00:58:05,680 about the things you don't know about and you don't claim to know about things you don't know about. 538 00:58:05,890 --> 00:58:10,780 So I I'm going to acknowledge that that's not a parallel that I can draw. 539 00:58:11,290 --> 00:58:13,750 This is I think why is for people like yourself and myself, 540 00:58:15,100 --> 00:58:21,309 though I did want to ask though and you kind of talked about the normative power of science. 541 00:58:21,310 --> 00:58:24,490 Does that come up in the book? Yes. Okay. Fantastic. 542 00:58:25,510 --> 00:58:28,930 So it particularly comes up in the discussion of pressing issues, 543 00:58:29,230 --> 00:58:36,400 because the essential question, legally speaking of the praying and shoes in the Hadith corpus, 544 00:58:36,400 --> 00:58:45,610 then in the motherhood tradition, is one of ritual cleanliness, of purifying the shoes so that they don't have the jester. 545 00:58:45,910 --> 00:58:49,360 Right now in the 20th century. 546 00:58:49,900 --> 00:58:57,310 So first of all, sort of to kind of say what is that inches drops off with the exception of the high school among Muslims more broadly. 547 00:58:57,610 --> 00:59:04,540 In part because we have this transition from Islam as a desert project to Islam as an urban project, 548 00:59:04,540 --> 00:59:09,520 and you have the development of these ornate mosques, often with very nice carpets. 549 00:59:10,120 --> 00:59:17,620 And we had the emergence of this norm against wearing shoes in mosques then and then tell us this in the mid 20th century. 550 00:59:17,920 --> 00:59:21,970 Now, the other thing I would note, though, and this is sort of striking to the 20th century, is that. 551 00:59:23,090 --> 00:59:27,320 When somebody is need to explain why they're not praying and choose. 552 00:59:27,830 --> 00:59:37,970 Right. They conflate in fascinating ways between the purity laws of the Islamic tradition and modern hygiene. 553 00:59:38,240 --> 00:59:44,450 So they one of the claims that's made is that Islam is the religion of cleanliness and 554 00:59:44,450 --> 00:59:50,150 will do and to Yemen are given as examples of Islam being the religion of cleanliness. 555 00:59:50,450 --> 00:59:56,960 But cleanliness and modern hygiene are not the same as. 556 00:59:58,390 --> 01:00:03,370 Ritual purity, right? It's not that they're inconsistent with them, but they're simply not the same. 557 01:00:03,730 --> 01:00:06,430 And that's the argument against praying and shoes. 558 01:00:07,120 --> 01:00:16,120 Increasingly, it becomes it would be to a it would be rude, it would muck up the carpet even if you were ritually pure and so forth, 559 01:00:16,300 --> 01:00:21,520 which is to say it's employing a logic that is essentially second tier. 560 01:00:21,520 --> 01:00:25,419 I mean, the other logic that is employed is it will cause fitna in your mosque. 561 01:00:25,420 --> 01:00:27,090 So you shouldn't do it. Right. 562 01:00:27,910 --> 01:00:38,070 But in the forties and fifties, when serious leaders were arguing for the importance of pagans, Jews didn't care that it caused a commotion. 563 01:00:38,080 --> 01:00:46,780 That was the whole darn point. It was this incredibly provocative move to distinguish Salafis from their not Salafi counterparts. 564 01:00:47,140 --> 01:00:52,630 And part of the move here was, you know, part of what we're doing here is that Salafis are often praying and not policy, 565 01:00:53,030 --> 01:00:58,630 and they really want to be able to distinguish themselves. And training issues is a real way to distinguish yourself. 566 01:00:58,840 --> 01:01:05,050 It's also a way to drive other folks absolutely crazy because, you know, what are you doing? 567 01:01:05,100 --> 01:01:06,790 You know, the response, right, is, what are you doing? 568 01:01:07,120 --> 01:01:15,159 And so the fact that by the late 20th century, fitna was being in a dove is being invoked is really, 569 01:01:15,160 --> 01:01:21,520 really interesting because the point from the beginning, not the whole point, but that was one of the points. 570 01:01:21,520 --> 01:01:25,570 It was emulating the prophet in a way that was also socially provocative. 571 01:01:25,870 --> 01:01:31,810 Right. I mean, your sort of comments about praying in shoes and I've not read that chapter yet, 572 01:01:32,200 --> 01:01:39,010 but it's a reminder to me, actually growing up in Manchester in the 1990 and 2000, 573 01:01:39,460 --> 01:01:45,370 that there were people in Manchester who called themselves Salafis who would actually create 574 01:01:45,370 --> 01:01:49,000 commotion in mosques by coming in with their shoes and insisting on praying in them. 575 01:01:49,300 --> 01:01:53,680 And so, I mean, these sorts of things have their afterlives and in Europe as well. 576 01:01:54,490 --> 01:02:02,140 So I want to go to the to another question from the audience, and I want to remind the audience, you know, please feel free to put in your questions. 577 01:02:02,860 --> 01:02:09,220 So, Nafisa, he asks, I think that the discussion has been overwhelmingly about the Arab world. 578 01:02:10,030 --> 01:02:13,959 This might again stretch your knowledge a bit, but you are a student of classism. 579 01:02:13,960 --> 01:02:16,520 And so I think it's the right question. 580 01:02:17,230 --> 01:02:22,630 Do you want to say something about the Salafis and India, Pakistan and Malaysia and other parts of the Muslim world, perhaps. 581 01:02:23,200 --> 01:02:28,849 So this is a transnational story of Salafism that's focussed on the Arab world and in particular in Egypt, 582 01:02:28,850 --> 01:02:36,810 that one could write a history of Salafism in South Asia, say, with a group such as al-Qaida. 583 01:02:37,030 --> 01:02:44,630 And one of the interesting things that we see among scholars in, of course, 584 01:02:44,650 --> 01:02:53,830 the 20th century is the increasing adoption of the lock up book, the sort of name of the scholars, name of these. 585 01:02:54,370 --> 01:02:59,830 So it's interesting. So it's clear that Salafism is also a project in South Asia. 586 01:03:00,870 --> 01:03:09,330 Now I chose to focus the project on the Arab world, on Egypt in particular, because every transnational project needs a geographic centre. 587 01:03:09,870 --> 01:03:13,080 What I would argue is twofold. One is that. 588 01:03:14,320 --> 01:03:19,990 Arabs Salafis have been have very much shaped this discourse must very much shape practice. 589 01:03:20,020 --> 01:03:28,630 I'd also say, though, that there's some really interesting intersections between South Asian scholars and Arab scholars on this matter. 590 01:03:29,110 --> 01:03:32,649 And something I bring up in the book, but it didn't mention the talk. 591 01:03:32,650 --> 01:03:37,590 Today is actually a pamphlet that was edited by Abdel Aziz Ibn. 592 01:03:38,470 --> 01:03:46,480 And it was originally written by Muhammad Zakaria Alawi, so a leading Deobandi scholar from this period. 593 01:03:46,840 --> 01:03:56,440 It was a pamphlet on the. This was before any of these pamphlets on the beard had started coming out, and it was discussing the idea. 594 01:03:56,800 --> 01:04:00,040 But this was a Deobandi scholar. This is not a salacious issue scholar. 595 01:04:00,400 --> 01:04:06,970 And this happened to be a Deobandi scholar who in the mid 1970s had migrated to Saudi Arabia. 596 01:04:07,210 --> 01:04:11,680 It had originally been published in Urdu and here it was being translated in Arabic. 597 01:04:12,160 --> 01:04:22,810 And so this is in some sense, there's a story to be told that after my story about the interaction between these understandings 598 01:04:23,080 --> 01:04:28,570 of the beard between the Middle East and South Asia or between the Middle East and Southeast Asia. 599 01:04:28,780 --> 01:04:30,700 So I started so in writing this book, 600 01:04:31,120 --> 01:04:39,280 I certainly wouldn't say that my ambition or what I achieved was to tell a comprehensive story of some of the practice throughout the world. 601 01:04:39,640 --> 01:04:49,360 Well, I would say that my goal was to tell a new and in-depth the North story of the emergence of Salafi practice in the Arab world, a key centre, 602 01:04:50,320 --> 01:04:59,440 and to reveal the logic that drove the emergence of that story to tell us something about the emergence of Salafism as a social project. 603 01:05:00,100 --> 01:05:09,160 And I would say that were I to focus this on another where this book to be written about Salafism in another part of the world, 604 01:05:09,550 --> 01:05:14,380 the trajectory in terms of the local specifics might look somewhat different, 605 01:05:14,770 --> 01:05:18,340 but I strongly suspect that the ultimate end result would be pretty similar. 606 01:05:18,880 --> 01:05:27,670 Right. Thank you. So I wanted to actually ask you specifically about the point that you make midway in the presentation about, I mean, 607 01:05:27,670 --> 01:05:37,720 really wonderful sort of set of three photos, right, where the bids from each other so hasn't been the hum of the city and Abdurrahman with him. 608 01:05:37,820 --> 01:05:46,299 And in some respects in a sense the couple that hasn't really come of age in the modern era yet in the Egyptian debate, incidentally, 609 01:05:46,300 --> 01:05:52,420 I mean Mohammed's victory and then the way that the position in the capital is pretty normative when the end of the month, as far as I understand. 610 01:05:52,420 --> 01:05:59,590 So I mean, they're. Yeah. I mean, that's my sense within the kind of humour that it's like it's supposed to be a hub. 611 01:05:59,710 --> 01:06:05,410 And so the event is a visually sort of when it comes to facial hair indistinguishable in my view, from Salafis. 612 01:06:06,130 --> 01:06:14,980 But in the middle of the 20th century in Egypt, you have a number of very prominent figures who don't really seem to have beards. 613 01:06:16,300 --> 01:06:19,150 You know what we would recognise as beards today? Right. 614 01:06:19,540 --> 01:06:26,650 And I wonder if you could perhaps explain a little I mean, I think I've even seen Chloe, you know, clean shaven. 615 01:06:26,980 --> 01:06:28,750 He, of course, born in 1926. 616 01:06:28,750 --> 01:06:37,780 You have people like Ahmad Shakir, who is, you know, a towering figure in in Hadith studies and highly respected by the onset of Sana mohammed. 617 01:06:37,780 --> 01:06:42,910 That was so the sort of like all who are associated with the US have very often just clean shaven. 618 01:06:43,180 --> 01:06:46,890 You think about all of the famous artists like Corey Abdel Basset, right? 619 01:06:47,350 --> 01:06:54,070 And so I wonder, like and so I've got the I mean, comes from a literature background, so maybe that's to be expected. 620 01:06:54,670 --> 01:06:58,450 But actually I kind of wonder, it's one thing to say you have to have it this link. 621 01:06:58,450 --> 01:07:01,750 It's another thing to say it's perfectly fine to be clean shaven. 622 01:07:02,260 --> 01:07:06,790 And I if you look at that debate in the book at all that, you know, 623 01:07:06,880 --> 01:07:11,110 people are being clean shaven because there's obviously a range between those two positions. 624 01:07:11,530 --> 01:07:18,550 Yeah. So I think this is a really interesting question because the print button. 625 01:07:19,560 --> 01:07:23,850 Model of an Islamic masculinity is a bearded man. 626 01:07:24,300 --> 01:07:28,800 But this is what distinguishes a mature man from a boy. 627 01:07:29,800 --> 01:07:40,320 But this is in some sense the mark of having completed puberty, and his work on this is particularly helpful then fascinating. 628 01:07:40,560 --> 01:07:46,890 And also a Sunday night to my body. And so the question then is, well, what changes in the 20th century? 629 01:07:47,130 --> 01:07:56,280 And here, I really think it's the model of secular nationalism, the clean shaven man, the clean shaven man as representative of progress, 630 01:07:56,280 --> 01:08:02,440 of a future for Egypt, of the intellectual and social and cultural pressures that that put on us. 631 01:08:03,420 --> 01:08:08,760 We already know that they were in a position where they had to really reformulate their claims 632 01:08:08,760 --> 01:08:14,579 to intellectual authority to respond not merely to this radically new intellectual terrain, 633 01:08:14,580 --> 01:08:17,790 but also to the fact that. 634 01:08:19,210 --> 01:08:29,800 The position of the AMA within the system is a mediator between ruler and ruled was really being established by the rise of mass politics. 635 01:08:30,280 --> 01:08:40,989 That this is part of the reason why people like Mohammed Panofsky and the second head of Ansar Abdulrazaq of ICP are 636 01:08:40,990 --> 01:08:49,900 educated us higher than leave because they're ultimately interested in playing a role in politics and society broadly. 637 01:08:50,200 --> 01:08:53,860 And it just doesn't appear to offer opportunities for that. 638 01:08:54,400 --> 01:08:56,980 So we have kind of this massive dislocation. 639 01:08:57,220 --> 01:09:05,980 And in the context of this mass dislocation, we have a model of the offending of the clean shaven men with a moustache. 640 01:09:06,340 --> 01:09:10,000 And this is something of a cultural ideal. 641 01:09:10,510 --> 01:09:17,890 And it's sort of one of these fascinating cultural ideals, because while it's linked to folks who are middle class, 642 01:09:18,010 --> 01:09:21,970 it's also performed by those who will fit that category economically. 643 01:09:22,120 --> 01:09:24,640 And it's a real question for us, 644 01:09:25,210 --> 01:09:35,550 because one of the real challenges of this period for us scholars is that as far as essentially a ladder of social mobility declines precipitously, 645 01:09:35,650 --> 01:09:46,300 that it still works for an elite but and is still remarkably accepting of folks who are blind, such as Abdul Hamid Kish. 646 01:09:46,990 --> 01:09:52,330 And this is out now. So there are still aspects of this old tradition that one can succeed in. 647 01:09:52,510 --> 01:10:00,450 But these are exceptional cases. And that the. For a lot of folks who are considering an education or for that matter, 648 01:10:00,810 --> 01:10:07,320 as another Oxford grad Hillary complex button on Darling shows are considering. 649 01:10:07,650 --> 01:10:11,400 Well, can I split the difference and go to the loom? 54? 650 01:10:12,550 --> 01:10:13,890 Well, yeah. Yeah, exactly. 651 01:10:14,700 --> 01:10:23,939 The question of how to navigate, not just questions of facial hair, but the broader questions of socio economic mobility and identity. 652 01:10:23,940 --> 01:10:33,030 That facial hair index are really challenging ones, so I find it altogether unsurprising that summer scholars often don't have beards. 653 01:10:33,270 --> 01:10:40,680 I will also say this is one of the critiques that some of these makers assert that, you know, the scholars don't have beards anymore. 654 01:10:40,740 --> 01:10:46,830 So this is the evidence that Utsav has declined, that it's an embodied visual evidence. 655 01:10:47,400 --> 01:10:53,970 But this is what tells you they're not really committed anymore, that they're really not the ears of the prophet anymore. 656 01:10:54,360 --> 01:11:02,730 They can't even keep a beard anymore. And so here we might think of the Salafi claim to the beard as in some sense. 657 01:11:03,830 --> 01:11:10,370 You know, we have this premodern Islamic tradition of the period as a marker of masculinity, generally Islamic masculine in particular. 658 01:11:10,610 --> 01:11:15,079 Then we go to the secular nationalist project and then we can see Islamic movements, 659 01:11:15,080 --> 01:11:20,659 and in their emphasis on the period as reacting and drawing on the pre-modern Islamic traditions, 660 01:11:20,660 --> 01:11:25,310 but fundamentally and unmistakeably reacting to the secular nationalist challenge. 661 01:11:25,570 --> 01:11:36,500 All right. Fascinating. I wanted to ask you about and perhaps just a reflection on the the I guess, 662 01:11:36,860 --> 01:11:42,020 the sort of ongoing debate in some respects about what is it to be a Salafi. 663 01:11:42,380 --> 01:11:47,870 So I think this is a very wide ranging debate, to be honest, that there is the genetic genealogy question, 664 01:11:47,870 --> 01:11:53,420 which you kind of allude to in your introduction with, I think, both here and Francophile and so on. 665 01:11:54,170 --> 01:11:58,010 But at the same time, there's also the question of typologies. 666 01:11:58,010 --> 01:12:02,300 And this is something I kind of struggle with as a scholar. I talk about this a little bit in my book. 667 01:12:02,660 --> 01:12:06,139 What does it mean even to categorise these people? These are useful typologies. 668 01:12:06,140 --> 01:12:11,209 They're heretics for analysis and so on. But what you describe from even I mean, 669 01:12:11,210 --> 01:12:20,510 which doesn't altogether surprise me in terms of what he told all the junior officers of the Army isn't terribly cultist, is it? 670 01:12:21,380 --> 01:12:26,780 And we always categorised as a quietest. So, I mean, I think that. 671 01:12:27,950 --> 01:12:35,270 I mean, these these I think you'll agree that these sort of categories are archetypes that we're using for convenience, 672 01:12:35,390 --> 01:12:38,390 but they're all, you know, sort of breaks of the trend. 673 01:12:38,570 --> 01:12:42,860 How do we understand even what they mean? Because that's an extremely subversive position. 674 01:12:42,890 --> 01:12:50,720 Yeah. Yeah. Well, I think it's not coincidental that it makes the statement about officers in another country. 675 01:12:51,050 --> 01:13:02,480 Right. Right. That we might think of quiet ism as reflecting a relationship to local political authorities rather than a lack of engagement 676 01:13:02,480 --> 01:13:08,990 with questions of politics or lack of ability or interest in engagement with questions of political authority more broadly. 677 01:13:09,770 --> 01:13:20,299 I think we might also say that there is a certain ambiguity between holding these theological and legal commitments and commitments to practice, 678 01:13:20,300 --> 01:13:32,060 mind you, and quiet ism, that there are instances where quiet ism as a project, which I think they do take seriously, normatively speaking. 679 01:13:32,720 --> 01:13:36,200 But there are instances where one really needs to thread it. 680 01:13:36,200 --> 01:13:38,959 And you know, and I'm thinking to use my Christmas book here, 681 01:13:38,960 --> 01:13:47,240 I'm about Muhammad Ali to see where he tells the story of something when he when there's a ruler who's engaged in their culture, 682 01:13:47,270 --> 01:13:51,560 what to do about it and sort of like this is to help you as well. 683 01:13:51,830 --> 01:14:01,380 I would simply say I would not call the Progressive a césaire, but I would simply note that this particular action could be categorised as loose, 684 01:14:01,430 --> 01:14:05,780 sort of very, very careful talk about the action, not the person. 685 01:14:06,230 --> 01:14:16,880 So I think look, I think the real the fundamental tension is about how these scholars understand Tawhid, which of course all Muslims uphold. 686 01:14:17,300 --> 01:14:26,270 But the Salafi understanding of Tawhid is a minoritarian one on a theological level within broader Islamic history. 687 01:14:26,270 --> 01:14:34,670 And also over the course of the 20th century comes to really expand, to involve a set of questions or in this context, 688 01:14:35,000 --> 01:14:41,100 potential sources of conflict that simply weren't an issue 50 years before. 689 01:14:41,330 --> 01:14:49,530 So, you know, for example, this question of the beard. It wouldn't have necessarily been an issue for a Salafi scholar in 1930. 690 01:14:49,560 --> 01:14:52,830 It clearly is by the late 1980s. 691 01:14:53,520 --> 01:14:58,829 And one of the things I actually argue in the book is that this is because Salafi conceptions 692 01:14:58,830 --> 01:15:07,070 of Tawhid have really redefined the relationship between data and other actions. 693 01:15:07,110 --> 01:15:17,580 You have traditionally this distinction between evidence and that you have this broad category of or other custom, which is across time and place. 694 01:15:17,850 --> 01:15:26,280 And one of my arguments is actually that some of these. Draw on custom in a way that is historically discontinuous to the tradition that they are. 695 01:15:26,430 --> 01:15:31,080 They adopt a concept of custom that's actually taken from secular nationalism, 696 01:15:31,380 --> 01:15:38,280 the concept of custom in which custom served as the basis of nations at the basis of communities to say, 697 01:15:38,280 --> 01:15:41,190 you know, this is why a custom is so important to target. 698 01:15:41,340 --> 01:15:47,400 And in doing so, they on the one hand, this means that they can lay claim to authority to regulate the past socially, 699 01:15:47,760 --> 01:15:52,350 because these issues of social practice are no longer matters of local discretion. 700 01:15:52,890 --> 01:15:56,400 They are matters of desire that one can't disagree on. 701 01:15:57,180 --> 01:16:03,450 The problem is that if you found this explicitly stated in this way, or this is your analytical sort of deduction. 702 01:16:03,480 --> 01:16:11,400 So what I am able to do is link between changing the use of the term other and an 703 01:16:11,400 --> 01:16:18,900 article that appeared in the Syrian Salafi periodical Islamic in the early 19 9040s, 704 01:16:19,380 --> 01:16:23,730 which we know leading members of our centre were reading. 705 01:16:23,970 --> 01:16:26,700 This is an article by a non Mohammed bin commander. 706 01:16:28,080 --> 01:16:36,510 But what we see after that point is the slow adoption of precisely the concept that al-Khatib is setting for somebody. 707 01:16:36,980 --> 01:16:40,290 I mean, it's worth noting, you're right, that it's a matter of Islam. 708 01:16:40,290 --> 01:16:44,540 He also hosted Muhammad also on a regular basis. 709 01:16:45,960 --> 01:16:54,540 And so this is a really this is sort of one of the points of the book where I nearly fell out of my chair, said, oh, my gosh, what? 710 01:16:54,720 --> 01:17:01,500 And this is, you know, not just important for understanding how Salafis view theology law, but also this. 711 01:17:02,500 --> 01:17:12,310 Expansion of the domain in Basra is actually essentially the precursor to the emergence of the Salafi manhunt that it's from 1930, 712 01:17:12,430 --> 01:17:21,190 36 through sixties, that we see this adjustment, this expansion of embeds into domains formerly occupied by custom. 713 01:17:21,700 --> 01:17:26,750 And then based on that, we see the emergence of the Salafi franchise. 714 01:17:27,550 --> 01:17:34,510 Fascinating. So, you know, I was right to sort of mention only Lucianne, who shows, of course, in your introduction in the footnotes. 715 01:17:34,510 --> 01:17:42,130 But his book, because your arguments seem to sort of fit quite well with some of what he's argued obviously in a transactional register. 716 01:17:42,520 --> 01:17:47,500 But I guess you're sort of enriching the debate specifically with respect to Egypt. 717 01:17:49,240 --> 01:17:55,480 Yeah, it's been a while since I read his book that I will revisit that as well, giving you lots of reading to do. 718 01:17:55,490 --> 01:18:05,979 I'm sure you have plenty of I'm sure you've lots of time used it. So I we have a couple of more I guess they've been sent in as in the Q&A. 719 01:18:05,980 --> 01:18:12,310 But the more I think like comments. So I guess we close with these just reflections on Ahmed Kandil sort of. 720 01:18:12,730 --> 01:18:17,650 Yeah, that's interesting. In Egypt, Mohammed Abdu wrote an article accepting Darwinian Theory of Evolution. 721 01:18:17,650 --> 01:18:22,620 So this is sort of I think there might have been other people as well around the time doing that. 722 01:18:22,840 --> 01:18:28,180 And then later the Muslim Salafis refused, but refused the theory of evolution. 723 01:18:28,450 --> 01:18:32,919 There seems to be a transition from the 19th 20 century position towards science and modernisation. 724 01:18:32,920 --> 01:18:38,980 Of course, you're keen to point out that Abdou doesn't fit that paradigm, but I'll leave it to you to do, I suppose. 725 01:18:40,120 --> 01:18:43,720 So one of those is argument is actually that of Ginnever himself, 726 01:18:44,400 --> 01:18:59,480 the conceptual history of that he was a proponent of moderate reform of Islam and that there is some case for considering that the category, 727 01:18:59,520 --> 01:19:05,679 some of the fire could encompass some folks to some degree in the period in the interwar period. 728 01:19:05,680 --> 01:19:11,920 But that really post-war post-World War two, this category really significantly narrowed. 729 01:19:12,370 --> 01:19:14,050 And this is also how you explain why, 730 01:19:14,350 --> 01:19:21,820 I suppose the publishing house published a lot of things that totally don't fit theologically, legally with Salafism today. 731 01:19:23,380 --> 01:19:35,140 Now, I think part of what's so interesting here is that this underscores a key driver in the formulation of solipsism. 732 01:19:35,140 --> 01:19:43,390 And this is an argument that there makes that this transition from colonial to post-colonial rule is a really important transition, 733 01:19:43,690 --> 01:19:49,719 that because it means that it's just simply a question of internal distinction, 734 01:19:49,720 --> 01:19:58,000 it's that the Egyptian Muslims for the first time have the opportunity to basically have it out over key issues with other Egyptian Muslims. 735 01:19:58,780 --> 01:20:05,530 And so in this category, you really need in this context, you really need to explain where you fit in, what your appeal is. 736 01:20:05,830 --> 01:20:15,100 And so folks who essentially prior to quote unquote, coming to power were at least in some kind of loose Islamic reformist alliance. 737 01:20:15,310 --> 01:20:19,510 They're different. And we see this in any kind of sort of opposition coalition. 738 01:20:20,200 --> 01:20:31,450 Once you have to really hash out those differences, well, then that coalition becomes increasingly hard to hold together. 739 01:20:32,710 --> 01:20:39,730 And so, yeah, I mean, I think this is part of what I'm doing in this book, though, and I think this is important, as we understand, 740 01:20:39,730 --> 01:20:45,940 some of that is to really situate cells in their broader ideological world, to understand the ways in which they. 741 01:20:48,470 --> 01:20:54,799 While claiming distinction are so fundamentally shaped by other movements. 742 01:20:54,800 --> 01:21:00,050 And here we might also think of the broader point about nationalism always being transnational, 743 01:21:00,650 --> 01:21:08,480 that all claims to national identity are not simply internally oriented, that they are also about contrasting yourself with other nations. 744 01:21:08,510 --> 01:21:15,110 You might also think about the global historian Christopher Bailey's point about the emergence of national dress in the 745 01:21:15,110 --> 01:21:22,040 long 19th century and the way in which the emergence of national dress is about nations performing for other nations, 746 01:21:22,520 --> 01:21:26,870 about the extraction of a particular element of indigenous clothing, 747 01:21:27,110 --> 01:21:32,030 and the positioning of that as a national dress to compare with that of other nations. 748 01:21:32,750 --> 01:21:37,130 And so I think it's precisely this process of clarification of the distinction 749 01:21:37,820 --> 01:21:42,230 that really goes into the sense of really allows us to replace solipsism. 750 01:21:43,190 --> 01:21:52,930 As a movement of the 20th century and avoid falling into the trap of telling a story of of us is primarily in terms of the Koran and some. 751 01:21:54,910 --> 01:22:01,360 Aaron Rock Singer. It's really been a wonderful sort of hour and a half of discussion of your latest book, 752 01:22:01,720 --> 01:22:07,060 In The Shade of the Sun Set of your piety in the 20th Century Middle East, I think. 753 01:22:07,750 --> 01:22:14,620 I encourage all of the audience members to try and get their hands on it and explore the other 754 01:22:14,620 --> 01:22:20,110 dimensions that we didn't really explore in quite so much systematic detail besides the beard. 755 01:22:20,740 --> 01:22:26,650 And really, it's been wonderful just having the opportunity to talk to you about your freshly pressed book. 756 01:22:26,920 --> 01:22:28,900 Well, thanks for having me. This is a lot of fun. 757 01:22:28,930 --> 01:22:35,800 And yeah, you know, you can buy the book on Amazon or from the University of California Press authors say it's easier on Amazon. 758 01:22:36,130 --> 01:22:42,820 But yeah, I'm I'm really excited for this book to kind of be read by folks beyond those who study science specifically, 759 01:22:42,820 --> 01:22:47,530 because I think it's had something to say about modern Islam in the modern Middle East more broadly. 760 01:22:48,430 --> 01:22:53,440 Thank you very much. And we look forward to having you in Oxford in person in the not too distant future. 761 01:22:53,710 --> 01:22:58,570 Kick it out. That sounds great to me. All right. Good evening.