1
00:00:05,840 --> 00:00:11,360
Good evening and welcome to our third Oxford Political Thoughts seminar for this term.

2
00:00:11,930 --> 00:00:14,330
This is coming to you from St Anthony's College, Oxford,

3
00:00:14,780 --> 00:00:20,210
and specifically at the Middle East Centre under the Islamic Contemporary Climate Studies Program.

4
00:00:20,900 --> 00:00:25,190
My name is Osama Azami and I am the co-convenor along with my colleague.

5
00:00:25,280 --> 00:00:31,249
If I select a special that she will be joining in just a short while and it really gives me immense

6
00:00:31,250 --> 00:00:39,440
pleasure to welcome you to a Oxford Political Thought seminar discussion on the notion of friendship.

7
00:00:39,950 --> 00:00:46,940
And we're delighted to be able to welcome two scholars from often situated in different parts of the world.

8
00:00:46,970 --> 00:00:51,110
But right now, Nuha is joining us from London,

9
00:00:51,440 --> 00:00:58,909
where he is associated with the Institute for Society Studies and also spends time at the

10
00:00:58,910 --> 00:01:05,630
American University of Sharjah and from across the Atlantic at Franklin and Marshall College,

11
00:01:05,900 --> 00:01:13,220
we have sheer alliteration. And as I have mentioned, both of them will be addressing the theme of friendship,

12
00:01:14,210 --> 00:01:23,330
specifically know how Charlotte will be talking about friendship in Islamic ethical, political thought, foundations and modern implications.

13
00:01:23,780 --> 00:01:31,430
And I'll start by giving a brief introduction to yourself, and therefore I'll ask you to take things away.

14
00:01:32,300 --> 00:01:36,890
Nuha is an associate professor at the American University of Sharjah and,

15
00:01:37,130 --> 00:01:42,050
as already mentioned, a scholar based at the Institute of Ismaili Studies in London as well.

16
00:01:42,380 --> 00:01:52,130
She completed her Ph.D. at the University of Cambridge and has taught and engaged in research in a number of institutions,

17
00:01:52,130 --> 00:01:59,480
from Cambridge to the School of Oriental and African Studies in London to the International Studies Centre at Queen's University in Canada.

18
00:02:01,730 --> 00:02:06,710
You've also taught has also taught at the Institute for Spanish Studies in London, continues to do so,

19
00:02:06,980 --> 00:02:13,310
and her main interests are in Islamic ethical and political thought and classical Arabic literature,

20
00:02:14,030 --> 00:02:18,200
as well as ethics and the Koran and the reception of the Qur'an in classical literary studies.

21
00:02:19,040 --> 00:02:25,340
I think most notably for this particular talk from your numerous publications and you have quite a collection,

22
00:02:26,090 --> 00:02:36,590
is your 2015 book Ethics in Islam, Friendship and Political Thought A Tahiti and His Contemporaries, published by Routledge.

23
00:02:37,070 --> 00:02:41,720
So with that brief introduction, I'd like to welcome you to give you a presentation.

24
00:02:42,020 --> 00:02:49,220
Thank you. Thank you so much, Osama. And thank you all for inviting me in to present in this series.

25
00:02:49,430 --> 00:02:57,020
Surely it's very nice to meet you and I look forward to connecting with you and engaging with your work.

26
00:02:57,020 --> 00:03:00,080
As we go forward, I'll start my presentation.

27
00:03:00,110 --> 00:03:03,260
I will try to keep the time as well.

28
00:03:03,830 --> 00:03:11,360
In head analysis of friendship and social networks in post-revolution a revolutionary fringe society,

29
00:03:11,630 --> 00:03:21,860
Sarah Horowitz reveals the extent to which politics and the friendship interacted in times of shifting political alliances here.

30
00:03:21,860 --> 00:03:31,550
The study also explains how French society responded to and recovered from the upheaval of the French Revolution,

31
00:03:32,780 --> 00:03:38,240
including that the sense of distrust and the division of society and on

32
00:03:38,360 --> 00:03:44,209
ideological lines friendship is presented as one bond that could restore trust,

33
00:03:44,210 --> 00:03:54,410
connection and cohesion among people. Trust and cohesion where we sit with the Society for the Functioning of the parliamentary life there.

34
00:03:54,740 --> 00:03:59,120
Therefore, many politicians turned to friends for help.

35
00:04:00,710 --> 00:04:10,130
In my talk, I will present a similar story about friendship in this context, but from very modern Islamic perspective.

36
00:04:10,910 --> 00:04:20,600
My aim is to use the 14th century Muslim think that any Aborigine he and his concept of Sadat of friendship into

37
00:04:20,600 --> 00:04:28,130
the broader development of friendship and its importance in the context of politics of his time and beyond.

38
00:04:29,600 --> 00:04:35,209
I want to begin by defining some of the points that shaped my thinking while exploring

39
00:04:35,210 --> 00:04:39,680
the subject of friendship in political thought in the 10th century Islamic context.

40
00:04:40,220 --> 00:04:49,490
My starting point was challenging the receiver and his argument that limits of secular approach on Islamic political thought.

41
00:04:50,090 --> 00:04:56,360
Modern concepts such as humanism and political philosophy as applied to authors like Haiti.

42
00:04:56,570 --> 00:05:05,420
And the texts, in my opinion, were not faithful to the social and intellectual context in which these sort were produced.

43
00:05:06,260 --> 00:05:11,270
These approaches impose certain assumed dichotomies,

44
00:05:11,270 --> 00:05:16,909
including the religious secular divide which overlooked the encyclopaedic system of

45
00:05:16,910 --> 00:05:23,210
knowledge that shaped their source and the interdisciplinary nature of their work.

46
00:05:23,540 --> 00:05:31,850
Where religious, philosophical and literary elements are intertwined, as I will show in my in the course of this book,

47
00:05:32,330 --> 00:05:42,920
another area of concern at the time was the contentious debate in earlier scholarship over whether the introduction of political,

48
00:05:42,920 --> 00:05:49,400
ethical concepts in Islamic thought was the product of the Greek or Arabic renaissance.

49
00:05:49,610 --> 00:05:55,280
As suggested by scholars such as Maus and Jeb and Judy Cramer,

50
00:05:55,280 --> 00:06:03,620
or largely an indigenous product of Muslim thinker in response to the adverse effects of political

51
00:06:03,620 --> 00:06:13,099
and social and social changes and the increasing polarisation of Islamic culture and cultures.

52
00:06:13,100 --> 00:06:16,850
And so this reminds me also of what Matthew Arnold,

53
00:06:17,120 --> 00:06:28,700
the great Victorian social and literary critic who offers a valuable context in which to interpret much, much of premodern Islamic philosophy.

54
00:06:29,450 --> 00:06:36,350
In 19. In 1869, he wrote a hippie ism and Hellenism.

55
00:06:36,590 --> 00:06:42,410
Between these two points, the influence moves our our world.

56
00:06:43,760 --> 00:06:55,610
So it was important to rethink these categories as a way of helping me understand the Islamic past and why certain concepts.

57
00:06:56,800 --> 00:07:03,250
Where proposed and applied in their own social and historical contexts.

58
00:07:03,910 --> 00:07:08,590
Thus, rather than applying the preset categories to.

59
00:07:09,890 --> 00:07:16,970
To these thinkers and their concepts, or assuming that they are reproduction of previous ones.

60
00:07:18,100 --> 00:07:24,459
I analysed the complexity of the system of knowledge that shaped the formation of important concepts and terms,

61
00:07:24,460 --> 00:07:34,210
including friendship that Attache D and his contemporaries employed in their historical context.

62
00:07:35,020 --> 00:07:41,530
And I also tried to identify the moral conceptual changes that thought the

63
00:07:41,530 --> 00:07:47,680
introduced to the concept of friendship and the ways in which they were applied.

64
00:07:48,970 --> 00:07:56,200
And their significance in relation to the unique historical context of Bullitt society.

65
00:07:56,860 --> 00:08:03,550
Furthermore, in order to make sense. Of what also is like a dossier that you were doing.

66
00:08:04,020 --> 00:08:16,499
I looked at these the scores on on friendship in relation or in the intellectual contexts of his contemporaries,

67
00:08:16,500 --> 00:08:20,670
who also proposed similar concepts and vocabulary,

68
00:08:20,670 --> 00:08:26,030
like the brother of ability who spoke about the concept of Brother Good Hua or like you have

69
00:08:26,040 --> 00:08:33,030
an idea who spoke about also about the concept of insanity and humanity and also Moscow.

70
00:08:33,150 --> 00:08:42,270
He Ahmedinejad been the way he also spoke about the idea and the brother and also spoke about the idea of love and the idea of friendship and justice,

71
00:08:42,270 --> 00:08:46,270
etc. So it was a,

72
00:08:46,680 --> 00:08:55,680
it was important to contextualise the whole to study or to understand the whole intellectual minutia of the time and

73
00:08:55,680 --> 00:09:03,030
to appreciate what the 14th century also wanted to say through their introduction of concepts such as friendship,

74
00:09:03,030 --> 00:09:09,480
brotherhood and love, as I just mentioned, or whatever types of knowledge they wanted to communicate.

75
00:09:11,250 --> 00:09:15,390
We should judge them by considering their perspective,

76
00:09:15,840 --> 00:09:22,650
perspectives and the range of issues that they aim to address within the context of their society.

77
00:09:23,880 --> 00:09:33,010
Which was. At the time, burdened by substantial social strife, political struggle and shifting political alliances,

78
00:09:33,010 --> 00:09:40,330
as well as division and heated debate on the nature and form of knowledge that could save society.

79
00:09:42,810 --> 00:09:54,090
Given the encyclopaedic nature, given the encyclopaedic nature of writing in the first ten century anthology, the armour begins to go.

80
00:09:54,210 --> 00:10:00,660
He and the Brethren ability to produce and produce exhibits, produce, exhibits,

81
00:10:01,320 --> 00:10:09,299
expositions of ideas to reflect on the nature of political matters and the morality of their

82
00:10:09,300 --> 00:10:16,110
society and current believe beliefs and practices invented in various places of their works,

83
00:10:16,110 --> 00:10:19,710
rather than in one specific study devoted to the subject.

84
00:10:20,220 --> 00:10:29,580
For example, Doshi discusses a number of intellectual themes and political ideas concerning the tensions between different bullied visitors.

85
00:10:30,150 --> 00:10:36,930
Namely, even then, they've been at bed as well as how best to rule the to rule the community.

86
00:10:37,170 --> 00:10:43,350
These ideas are scattered in his books and especially found in his books.

87
00:10:43,350 --> 00:10:49,049
And in fact, on a set, the book of the light and conviviality was needed.

88
00:10:49,050 --> 00:10:54,630
I am the moral of the two visitors, as well as a study of a study of friendship and dissent,

89
00:10:55,140 --> 00:11:04,350
which is a lengthy emphasis on the theme of the friendship, which, though he did, composed at the request of the boy, a visit of Baghdad.

90
00:11:04,440 --> 00:11:16,290
Then I bet a and then them who seemed to have heard about associated discourse on the friendship from and then the

91
00:11:16,320 --> 00:11:26,190
famous Zaid been the father who is supposed to be a member of the brethren of the group of the brethren of purity.

92
00:11:26,670 --> 00:11:33,090
This epistle was based on the lectures that he though hardly seems to have delivered

93
00:11:33,090 --> 00:11:37,830
on friendship and related matters in the philosophical circles of Baghdad.

94
00:11:38,130 --> 00:11:51,240
At the end of 370 980, which included members of the School of the Christian philosopher Adi and the Muslim philosopher Abu Suleyman, said Gisenyi.

95
00:11:51,810 --> 00:12:01,220
And so in order to to set his epistle within the wider genre of intellectual inquiry and to often,

96
00:12:01,590 --> 00:12:08,280
if inside then guidance that he be drew not a boon previous ideas on friendship.

97
00:12:09,290 --> 00:12:16,190
Be they religious or philosophical, as though he and his contemporaries seem to be more.

98
00:12:16,940 --> 00:12:18,469
When we look at these ideas,

99
00:12:18,470 --> 00:12:27,320
they seem to be more concerned with methods actually related to everyday experience of Boyd's social and political situations,

100
00:12:27,530 --> 00:12:32,900
rather than with a coherent analysis of the theory of friendship or polity.

101
00:12:34,370 --> 00:12:43,280
And it is worth. It is noteworthy that these two scholars shared a consent for collective harmonious living,

102
00:12:43,520 --> 00:12:49,940
which could be it which could explain their interest in an exclusive in an inclusive approach to knowledge.

103
00:12:50,690 --> 00:13:00,470
These scholars thought that people need to be reminded of the of the actions and moral context which enable people to live together.

104
00:13:00,680 --> 00:13:09,770
They propose the questions including why do human need to live in a social framework and what forms of affiliation,

105
00:13:09,980 --> 00:13:15,110
affiliations or sociability should exist in order for people to exist harmoniously and

106
00:13:15,110 --> 00:13:23,480
maintain salvation and the good life to explain humanity's need for social cooperation.

107
00:13:23,510 --> 00:13:33,920
These philosophers obviously brought forward several arguments for the need of the one or cooperation.

108
00:13:34,160 --> 00:13:42,980
One of these arguments is the is that they said that the inability of humans to viewed all their needs alone.

109
00:13:44,090 --> 00:13:47,780
Is what? Mississippi friendship and cooperation.

110
00:13:47,780 --> 00:13:53,200
And they cite Aristotle's concept of man as a social animal incident.

111
00:13:53,210 --> 00:14:04,430
And in some in Elmer Almaden or and Haven Madani, the inability also to reach moral perfection on the earth,

112
00:14:04,430 --> 00:14:11,330
to beautify their soul alone, and therefore concepts like brotherhood,

113
00:14:12,230 --> 00:14:25,520
humanity, friendship were seen as both to achieve the true happiness and thus a better time to cultivate morality, social behaviours and cooperation.

114
00:14:27,200 --> 00:14:31,400
In his Edison and Sadak, a study the friendship and the friends.

115
00:14:32,520 --> 00:14:35,910
At the hip it. From the outset.

116
00:14:40,260 --> 00:14:50,720
He. It introduces friendship as the highest moral value that links religion.

117
00:14:50,900 --> 00:14:56,120
Reason. Morals in theory and practice.

118
00:14:58,310 --> 00:15:05,629
It is also useful to note that in deciding who requested the who requested the

119
00:15:05,630 --> 00:15:12,470
composition of the of the Epistle was faced by external and internal threats,

120
00:15:12,530 --> 00:15:16,070
as well as shifting political alliances at the time.

121
00:15:16,640 --> 00:15:20,480
In this context, the subject of a friendship was a beating.

122
00:15:21,630 --> 00:15:29,459
Especially the unavoidable friendship with an enemy, which was a major theme running through the epistle of it,

123
00:15:29,460 --> 00:15:37,470
though he viewed the friendship with an enemy and instead and in order to help keep the danger under control.

124
00:15:37,980 --> 00:15:47,460
And this theme was a very important theme in the episode itself and in circumstances of conspiracy and shifting political alliances.

125
00:15:47,760 --> 00:15:57,510
The practice of defending an enemy. Build one self built on self interest and was common actually in the period.

126
00:15:58,570 --> 00:16:03,240
I'm going to share with you my my PowerPoint because I would like to read this.

127
00:16:04,340 --> 00:16:10,170
This one of the citation that says this is the definition I would like to look at.

128
00:16:10,220 --> 00:16:13,360
Very this is a beautiful definition of a friendship.

129
00:16:14,060 --> 00:16:25,630
So start the epistle by introducing this very unique friendship between a philosopher and the judge and the religious judge.

130
00:16:26,080 --> 00:16:35,080
And so it's it's he's a he introduces this a friendship between the philosopher Ibn Abbasid Salim that Gisenyi and Ibn Salah.

131
00:16:35,500 --> 00:16:45,010
And he says, you can read it. So we can see from this quotation that though he just seems to offer the example of the true

132
00:16:45,010 --> 00:16:50,770
friendship between assiduous study and who is a master of logic and the Greek philosophy.

133
00:16:51,070 --> 00:16:59,590
And the judge, Ibn say Yahoo! Is a learned man in religious law as a model of effective polity,

134
00:16:59,890 --> 00:17:12,330
since he is actually addressing of a zeal that replaces the baton of competing political military commanders or kinship this person,

135
00:17:12,910 --> 00:17:20,110
the person centred approach to the ruling. We can also see that it is a model that seek it.

136
00:17:20,110 --> 00:17:29,260
Then we can also see that he does attempt to seek patronage and to promote the role of intellectuals in society.

137
00:17:29,530 --> 00:17:41,860
He also seems to be offering a theory and practice of a friendship based on religion and the reason to reform and to reform the political domain.

138
00:17:43,960 --> 00:17:49,460
And these last things highlight the transcendent character.

139
00:17:49,810 --> 00:17:57,650
Though he does this interest. A concept of friendship between the philosopher and the judge or a ruler,

140
00:17:57,890 --> 00:18:07,820
since it exceeds the limitations of a specific categories and combines religion and philosophy in an ideal political framework.

141
00:18:10,340 --> 00:18:18,850
At the at the time of adoption, these two disciplines were seen as separate and as two disciplines that cannot be combined.

142
00:18:18,860 --> 00:18:28,610
And it was a very clever attempt to bring them together through this sort of this through this framework of friendship.

143
00:18:29,780 --> 00:18:34,730
It seems to be establishing here a balance between the role of knowledge.

144
00:18:35,840 --> 00:18:42,740
By introducing the scholars to study and law in reforming and organising society.

145
00:18:42,980 --> 00:18:49,280
It also seems that the friendship between the man of knowledge and the men of religion and

146
00:18:49,280 --> 00:18:56,090
authority remains essential in Haiti's theory of the connection between knowledge and politics.

147
00:18:57,500 --> 00:19:03,770
Thus this the inescapable relationship between Haiti's concept of friendship and politics

148
00:19:03,770 --> 00:19:11,060
can be seen also in the role of human companionship as a necessary means for ruling with.

149
00:19:12,030 --> 00:19:21,840
But by promoting the example of the rule, our friend and the need for a ruler to turn to friends for advice.

150
00:19:21,870 --> 00:19:33,239
He offers insights concerning the bond of political affiliations and addresses the importance of adopting friendship as a political practice,

151
00:19:33,240 --> 00:19:36,630
especially in times of trouble and shifting political alliances.

152
00:19:36,870 --> 00:19:45,240
Which takes us to, in some ways, the work of Sarah House that I started with and his views.

153
00:19:48,490 --> 00:20:04,860
On them can also be related to the wider project to persuade people in an authority of the indispensability of a wise and just ruler.

154
00:20:05,430 --> 00:20:16,560
And just to a certain extent, I can see a reference to the notion of the platonic notion of a philosopher king and that as the best model for ruling.

155
00:20:18,040 --> 00:20:26,110
And at that point that the air that is noteworthy here is if you can look at my and the words that I thought that I highlighted in red,

156
00:20:26,650 --> 00:20:37,570
and you can see that here he is offering in like four key elements to his concept of Sadako, which is so.

157
00:20:38,580 --> 00:20:42,570
Intellect, nature and morals. And these feelings.

158
00:20:42,600 --> 00:20:51,839
These were very important philosophical concepts that were discussed greatly and in the schools of Abu Salim and said,

159
00:20:51,840 --> 00:20:55,180
just Danny, if not the and the brethren of impurity.

160
00:20:55,200 --> 00:21:04,349
So when we look at these four key components of so that we can see he does attempts to introduce

161
00:21:04,350 --> 00:21:12,270
a darker and to make it imply epidemiological conception to secure a person's perfection

162
00:21:12,270 --> 00:21:19,469
and happiness since it consists of the soul that determines a person's moral equality and

163
00:21:19,470 --> 00:21:29,490
control and havoc and and has a control over the body and direct it directs it to goodness.

164
00:21:30,870 --> 00:21:35,270
So we can see also reason and nature and mortars.

165
00:21:35,280 --> 00:21:39,140
The friendship can be seen here then as a framework as both.

166
00:21:39,150 --> 00:21:47,760
The more we in order to address social and political challenges in society and to produce alternative,

167
00:21:47,760 --> 00:22:01,110
moral and intellectual responses to social disintegration and to the decline in morality which were characteristic of society at the time.

168
00:22:01,770 --> 00:22:09,000
I would like you now to look at the other quotation, which is Who can be a friend?

169
00:22:09,300 --> 00:22:18,330
This was another important point. In Italy, this episode is like and the theme of what is a friend?

170
00:22:19,890 --> 00:22:25,230
What should a friend do? Who can be a friend or who cannot be a friend.

171
00:22:25,830 --> 00:22:29,970
So you can see here a very interesting and lengthy quote he says.

172
00:22:31,750 --> 00:22:38,400
And these are questions that they they are both normative and action guiding ethical questions.

173
00:22:38,790 --> 00:22:48,210
And and they define also and they also these questions also define the nature of this virtual friendship,

174
00:22:48,780 --> 00:22:53,819
which is the place of places at the heart of an alternative moral order.

175
00:22:53,820 --> 00:23:03,900
And if you look at the court, you can see that things according to authority cannot difference, cannot enter the realm of friendship.

176
00:23:04,500 --> 00:23:10,890
And he excludes them from friendship because of their oppression, passion,

177
00:23:11,190 --> 00:23:16,440
and because of their and unjust character at times and aggressive character.

178
00:23:16,440 --> 00:23:22,200
So you can see here also an attempt to link the concept of friendship with the concept of justice,

179
00:23:22,650 --> 00:23:29,850
which was also extremely important in Hades and conceptualisation of his framework.

180
00:23:30,930 --> 00:23:45,390
And so we can see here also that there are other people excluded from being able to be friends like the and the lonely in society,

181
00:23:45,410 --> 00:23:52,680
like because of their also lonely characters and lack of ambition, etc.

182
00:23:53,040 --> 00:24:01,559
And I think something that is of interest to us as scholars, when he say also when writers and put them and who they were,

183
00:24:01,560 --> 00:24:06,840
I think they were the academic they were the academic group of the time, he says.

184
00:24:06,840 --> 00:24:16,620
When writers and could them and the people acknowledge have withdrawn themselves from competition, jealousy, hypocrisy and duplicity,

185
00:24:16,920 --> 00:24:28,190
sometimes friendship with them may be maybe becomes sound, and they may show the fidelity, though that is a scarcity.

186
00:24:28,230 --> 00:24:32,760
And this scarcity is due to a scarcity in its origins.

187
00:24:33,180 --> 00:24:44,700
I'm afraid it's a bit of a gloomy image, but again, what he is trying to say is like trying to say that everything that distracts,

188
00:24:45,030 --> 00:24:51,330
everything that distracts social harmony cannot be included in friendship,

189
00:24:51,690 --> 00:24:59,070
cannot be included in what he sees or what he imagines as the framework of friendship.

190
00:24:59,080 --> 00:25:07,230
So so through the framework of who can be included in friendship and who should be excluded at the links,

191
00:25:07,620 --> 00:25:13,260
the virtue of friendship to justice, and in his view, for the friendship to exist.

192
00:25:14,360 --> 00:25:19,790
I wrote, a ruler should maintain justice and should protect people,

193
00:25:20,900 --> 00:25:29,090
while the lack of friendship brings a deteriorating political, economic and social climate.

194
00:25:30,080 --> 00:25:39,440
This defines a modern form of ruling as that which preserves the community and establishes social harmony,

195
00:25:39,770 --> 00:25:45,410
reason and action, and in opposition to passion and religious zing.

196
00:25:45,650 --> 00:25:51,310
How much time do I still have? Unfortunately, if you see this.

197
00:25:51,880 --> 00:25:55,780
Yes, slightly. So if you can knock on the alarm,

198
00:25:56,080 --> 00:26:02,350
I'm just very quickly just mentioned that the also a very important distinction in the he within

199
00:26:02,350 --> 00:26:11,440
the framework of friendship is the distinction between friendship and other forms of emotions.

200
00:26:11,890 --> 00:26:21,129
So for him, friendship is higher than other forms of familial love because it is suited for the purpose of reason.

201
00:26:21,130 --> 00:26:27,490
And also, I would like very briefly to mention that although it may be like there is a

202
00:26:27,490 --> 00:26:32,560
difference between this concept of friendship and that of the Aristotelian philia,

203
00:26:33,580 --> 00:26:43,300
though he doesn't exist, and his as well as his teachers suggest that they both don't accept the friendship that is based on passion and pleasure.

204
00:26:43,660 --> 00:26:47,380
They only accept this interest, the interest of the friendship.

205
00:26:47,830 --> 00:26:58,630
And so we can see that that he does not take over the Aristotelian understanding of philia,

206
00:26:59,020 --> 00:27:12,999
but he actually excludes certain elements that he doesn't agree with, and he brings other elements from other religious sources.

207
00:27:13,000 --> 00:27:26,150
And citing read a bow, it's like a challenge, etc. In order to offer a more harmonious form of friendship that is able to bring it,

208
00:27:26,660 --> 00:27:33,010
to enable people not just to exist, but actually to exist in a harmonious way in society.

209
00:27:33,340 --> 00:27:36,969
I'll stop here and I'm sorry that I exceeded that.

210
00:27:36,970 --> 00:27:47,800
So thank you so much. That was really a wonderful sort of overview and in many respects a compatibility of tahiti's interpretation

211
00:27:48,310 --> 00:27:57,610
or conception of the notion of friendship across sort of his own contextual and his own context,

212
00:27:57,610 --> 00:27:59,709
but also looking at the in some respects,

213
00:27:59,710 --> 00:28:09,010
the philosophical genealogy of his ideas, because it's fascinating to think about a figure who is in that, of course,

214
00:28:09,010 --> 00:28:12,760
in some respects the centre of the world at the time, but at the centre of the Muslim world,

215
00:28:12,760 --> 00:28:18,760
certainly who is grappling with these divergent traditions.

216
00:28:19,150 --> 00:28:25,479
But there's also the anecdote that you mentioned about the jurist and the I guess,

217
00:28:25,480 --> 00:28:30,790
the philosopher and the jurist when they are meeting, when those minds are meeting.

218
00:28:31,090 --> 00:28:37,360
That's two very noteworthy competitors to the intellectual space as well.

219
00:28:37,780 --> 00:28:42,759
And so I'm sure in the course of the discussion and I'd like to welcome Faisal because he was

220
00:28:42,760 --> 00:28:50,890
able to join mid-stream and will be able to inquire into those aspects of your fascinating talk.

221
00:28:51,190 --> 00:28:58,720
So thank you very much. It's really been beneficial to do something, you know, and you've done all the hard work.

222
00:29:00,550 --> 00:29:08,410
Thank you so much. And I also want to remind audience members, if you'd like to put in any questions to any of our panellists,

223
00:29:09,040 --> 00:29:16,810
please feel free to sort of write those in the Q&A and we will take them up in the Q&A portion.

224
00:29:17,200 --> 00:29:18,880
So let me first introduce you.

225
00:29:19,180 --> 00:29:28,780
Sharon Schiraldi is a currently associate professor of Religious Studies and department chair of Religious Studies at Franklin and Marshall College.

226
00:29:29,830 --> 00:29:39,100
He's been there since 2012, and he's he received his Ph.D. in 2012 from Duke University study under Ibrahim Moussa and

227
00:29:39,640 --> 00:29:45,100
researches Muslim intellectual traditions and debates in early modern and modern South Asia.

228
00:29:46,360 --> 00:29:51,339
His fantastic and remarkably long book, Defending Mohammed in Modernity,

229
00:29:51,340 --> 00:29:57,010
is published by University of Notre Dame Press in 2020 and received the American Institute for Pakistan

230
00:29:57,010 --> 00:30:03,670
Studies 2020 Book Prize and was selected as a finalist in the 2021 American Academy of Religion Book Award.

231
00:30:04,090 --> 00:30:09,909
So you're now my understanding is working more squarely in a second book project.

232
00:30:09,910 --> 00:30:18,880
On a second book project. And you have a, I think, a working title, Perilous Intimacies Debate, Debating Hindu, Muslim, Friendship after Empire.

233
00:30:19,300 --> 00:30:29,620
And so very much squarely both of your books ask in your case, Shirley, your second book squarely in the realm of this week's theme.

234
00:30:29,630 --> 00:30:32,620
So I really look forward to your presentation,

235
00:30:32,620 --> 00:30:40,430
which is entitled I'll just read the title words Debating Muslim Hindu Friendship After Empire, and I'll leave it to you.

236
00:30:40,810 --> 00:30:45,740
Thank you. Thank you so much to Professor Linda Summer for this invitation.

237
00:30:45,740 --> 00:30:49,549
It really is an honour to be here. Thank you so much. No help for you. Really wonderful talk.

238
00:30:49,550 --> 00:30:50,540
I learned so much from it.

239
00:30:51,020 --> 00:30:59,540
I really am honoured to be here, so I just prepared some comments to stay within my 20 minutes and my comments to come from my second book,

240
00:30:59,870 --> 00:31:04,160
which I've just finished and is forthcoming next October from Columbia University Press.

241
00:31:04,170 --> 00:31:09,410
As Osama mentioned, it's titled Perilous into the Seas Debating Hindu-Muslim Friendship After Empire.

242
00:31:10,190 --> 00:31:15,980
The six chapters of this book look at very discursive and political theatres of intra Muslim scholarly contestations,

243
00:31:16,460 --> 00:31:23,150
primarily focusing on the thought of prominent, early, modern and modern South Asian or traditionally cleaned Muslim scholars on the

244
00:31:23,150 --> 00:31:28,100
boundaries of Hindu-Muslim friendships from the late 18th to the mid 20th century.

245
00:31:28,940 --> 00:31:32,990
Since the theme of this seminar is Friendship and Politics, this is what I will focus on as well,

246
00:31:33,680 --> 00:31:37,880
which also forms an important element of the conceptual constitution of this book.

247
00:31:38,660 --> 00:31:44,030
And in this regard, I am interested in exploring ways in which friendship, especially interreligious friendship,

248
00:31:44,810 --> 00:31:51,950
emerges as a promise as well as imperative for different stripes of South Asian Ottoman in modern South Asia.

249
00:31:52,340 --> 00:31:56,480
So this idea of friendship as a promise and a peril will be key to my comments today.

250
00:31:57,260 --> 00:32:00,350
But before I give you a couple of examples to elaborate on this point,

251
00:32:00,500 --> 00:32:05,059
we offered a very quick theoretical comparison between discourses on friendship

252
00:32:05,060 --> 00:32:09,320
and politics in Western philosophical and Islamic intellectual thought,

253
00:32:09,800 --> 00:32:14,730
broadly speaking. Contemporary philosopher Alexander Demas,

254
00:32:14,730 --> 00:32:21,629
in a probing survey of the idea of friendship in Western philosophical thought, argued that from Aristotle onwards,

255
00:32:21,630 --> 00:32:27,390
friendship has represented what he called a double face that promises the highest bonds of virtue,

256
00:32:27,990 --> 00:32:33,780
while also threatening to morally corrupt someone blindly, blindingly bound to a harmful friend.

257
00:32:34,710 --> 00:32:41,250
Friendship, in other words, is both a promise as well as a parable on a somewhat similar note friendship as Jacques Derrida

258
00:32:41,250 --> 00:32:46,380
in his classic The Politics of Friendship had elaborated is intimately entwined with enmity.

259
00:32:47,070 --> 00:32:51,690
While describing German theorist and lawyer Carl Schmidt's thought that it offered

260
00:32:51,690 --> 00:32:55,530
a set of brief and brilliant comments that captured the key conceptual order.

261
00:32:55,530 --> 00:33:02,700
What I'm After. Once the enemy had disappeared, Derrida writes, the friend would disappear at once.

262
00:33:03,450 --> 00:33:10,799
The possibility, the meaning and phenomenon of friendship would never appear unless the figure of the enemy had already called upon them.

263
00:33:10,800 --> 00:33:17,220
To call upon them in advance, had indeed put to them the question or the objection of the friend.

264
00:33:17,730 --> 00:33:21,600
A wounding question, a question of rules and of good.

265
00:33:22,380 --> 00:33:29,470
They did a famously continued with this pithily evocative sentence No friend without the possible wound.

266
00:33:30,300 --> 00:33:35,280
Friendship and Derrida's words is only possible alone alongside the wound of enmity.

267
00:33:35,970 --> 00:33:39,990
Friendship requires enmity, and it's doomed as a condition of its possibility.

268
00:33:40,470 --> 00:33:45,240
No friendship without enmity. No friend without the possible good.

269
00:33:46,380 --> 00:33:52,590
In another essay, cryptically but productively titled Hostile Vitality Hospitality,

270
00:33:53,370 --> 00:34:03,540
Derrida showed that the ideas of hospitality and hostility share a troubling common origin between Hostess as host and hostess as enemy.

271
00:34:04,200 --> 00:34:11,790
Hospitality. The lynchpin of friendship is always vulnerable to be parasitised by its opposite hostility,

272
00:34:12,510 --> 00:34:18,360
the undesirable guest which it harbours as the self-contradiction in its own body.

273
00:34:18,900 --> 00:34:22,680
Back to friendship, though. What then, do I mean by the category of friendship?

274
00:34:24,090 --> 00:34:27,090
I want to experiment by approaching friendship, and here I would share screen.

275
00:34:27,090 --> 00:34:29,940
So it's easy for you to follow my my comments.

276
00:34:30,990 --> 00:34:40,350
As attractive as a relationship or encounter of intimacy, collaboration, cooperation or hospitality with the other.

277
00:34:41,300 --> 00:34:47,420
That viable affording particular benefits, opportunities and forms of power and pleasure.

278
00:34:48,410 --> 00:34:54,260
Also renders untenable exclusive claims to the purity and sovereign ownership of the self.

279
00:34:55,400 --> 00:35:00,410
Friendship is an invitation that cannot be embraced without forgoing the claim to sovereign mastery.

280
00:35:01,340 --> 00:35:04,940
Friendship frustrates sovereignty and is a reminder of its impossibility.

281
00:35:05,570 --> 00:35:11,000
Friendship, especially interreligious friendship, while holding the promise of engaging in access into the other,

282
00:35:11,000 --> 00:35:16,970
also invites peril by signalling the inextricable entanglement of the self with the contingencies of the other.

283
00:35:18,180 --> 00:35:25,350
Friendship offers the possibility of enrichment and expansion, but also carries the threat of influence, corruption or even erasure.

284
00:35:26,370 --> 00:35:32,310
It is this underlying tension and friction between friendship and sovereignty that most interests me.

285
00:35:33,150 --> 00:35:40,740
How does the moment of encounter between religious identity and difference present itself as both a promise as well as a threat?

286
00:35:41,460 --> 00:35:44,910
And what sorts of intra religious negotiations in this case,

287
00:35:44,910 --> 00:35:52,380
intra Muslim negotiations and forms and modes of politics, does that encounter foster and ferment?

288
00:35:52,860 --> 00:35:58,200
This is a foundational question that I'm interested in and want to open up for discussion.

289
00:35:59,600 --> 00:36:05,059
Now the Muslim discursive category corresponding to the idea of friendship most frequently invoked by the

290
00:36:05,060 --> 00:36:09,980
South Asian actors I focussed on in my book was not so much that of savarkar that we had talked about,

291
00:36:10,370 --> 00:36:15,800
but is that of mobile, not an Arabic term that carries the dual meaning of relationship, of friendship,

292
00:36:16,160 --> 00:36:23,000
intimacy and loyalty, or that of client and patronage, as in that between the state and its subjects.

293
00:36:23,660 --> 00:36:28,550
It logically carries that excuse me, it etymological shares the roots.

294
00:36:28,910 --> 00:36:33,160
One idea of mystically infused terms like the friend of God Valley,

295
00:36:33,230 --> 00:36:39,740
usually meaning a Sufi master and will air or sainthood now curiously will air and its Siamese twin.

296
00:36:39,740 --> 00:36:44,330
While air can also mean sovereignty, sovereign power and sovereign authority,

297
00:36:44,780 --> 00:36:49,100
reinforcing the conceptual and linguistic intimacy between friendship and sovereignty.

298
00:36:49,550 --> 00:36:55,280
For instance, the 11th century Qur'an executed theologian and author of the famous Dictionary of Koranic

299
00:36:55,280 --> 00:37:00,769
Terms Alma afraid that we thought evil could Undruggable is the honey died 11 to 8 defined

300
00:37:00,770 --> 00:37:06,559
and voila as the authority of command the one legal number while capturing the semantic frame

301
00:37:06,560 --> 00:37:11,720
of the roots one the with the following description and I quoting here Intimacy of space,

302
00:37:12,080 --> 00:37:17,270
lineage, religion, friendship, loyalty and beliefs, end of quote.

303
00:37:25,320 --> 00:37:32,129
Only prudent aliyah carries the meaning of a friend, an intimate as a friend of God or Sufi saint, but also that of a protector,

304
00:37:32,130 --> 00:37:39,150
master or person with power and authority who can lay claim to the guardianship or alliance layer of the community.

305
00:37:40,070 --> 00:37:43,430
For instance, God described himself as the legal guardian of the faithful.

306
00:37:43,430 --> 00:37:49,100
In verse 2 to 57 of the Koran, the party reads, God is the guardian of those who established feet.

307
00:37:50,210 --> 00:37:56,240
Now, the expert of the Arab beat, Michel Djokovic, has succinctly described the etymological duality of this category.

308
00:37:56,240 --> 00:38:02,510
When he writes, and I'm quoting here, the primary meaning of value is proximity or contiguity.

309
00:38:02,900 --> 00:38:12,200
And this, in turn, gives rise to two further meanings. One of these is to be a friend, and the other is to direct, to govern, to take in charge.

310
00:38:12,770 --> 00:38:16,250
Thus, the wealthy, properly speaking, is the friend who is close.

311
00:38:17,060 --> 00:38:21,709
But as the famous 13th century lexicographer Ibn Manzo put died in 11,

312
00:38:21,710 --> 00:38:30,170
emphasises in the lesson of the speech of Arabs, the holy is also the Nossiter who assists and the he who disposes.

313
00:38:30,590 --> 00:38:36,780
So the point is this. In this formulation, friendship is fraught with power.

314
00:38:37,800 --> 00:38:44,790
If cultivated in a salutary fashion, friendship promises the gift of sovereign power and authority.

315
00:38:45,270 --> 00:38:50,690
Pastoral or territorial, extended by the most absolute of all sovereigns.

316
00:38:50,700 --> 00:38:51,570
The Divine sovereign.

317
00:38:52,620 --> 00:39:02,219
But friendship with an undesirable, the other that portends perilous and harmful consequences eviscerates the integrity of the self, and by extension,

318
00:39:02,220 --> 00:39:11,100
that of the community, unleashing spiritual and political ruin friendship, as does the prize promise, as well as a potentially dire peril.

319
00:39:11,820 --> 00:39:12,500
Moreover,

320
00:39:12,510 --> 00:39:20,579
and this is the crucial point the idea of friendship or Moala and connected categories like and voila rely and rely on in Muslim intellectual

321
00:39:20,580 --> 00:39:29,340
thought include but go much beyond the commonplace notion of congeniality or good relations that one associates with the English word friendship.

322
00:39:29,490 --> 00:39:36,990
Today, rather, mobile art encompasses and brings together theological, political and everyday intimacies.

323
00:39:37,710 --> 00:39:46,440
It is a category that connects to political theology, eager to guard a muslim sovereign power with the desired choreography of the everyday

324
00:39:46,440 --> 00:39:51,510
anxiously invested in preserving Muslim distinction over its various others.

325
00:39:52,530 --> 00:39:59,280
How is this normative mandate an architecture of interreligious friendship negotiated

326
00:39:59,280 --> 00:40:05,400
and debated in the context marked by the aftermath of Muslim political assault?

327
00:40:06,510 --> 00:40:11,999
In other words, how is the promise and peril of interreligious friendship and intimacy, especially in India?

328
00:40:12,000 --> 00:40:19,079
Muslim friendship and intimacy debated after Muslim imperial sovereignty in contexts like modern South Asia,

329
00:40:19,080 --> 00:40:22,500
defined by the absence of Muslim political sovereignty.

330
00:40:22,890 --> 00:40:30,270
These questions are at the heart of my interest. Let me give two interconnected examples for purposes of illustration.

331
00:40:31,870 --> 00:40:38,560
One of the main arguments I make in my book is that from the late 18th century onwards, the increasingly colonised minority,

332
00:40:39,340 --> 00:40:45,430
the interpretive galleries that informed South Muslim scholarly engagements with the question of Islam

333
00:40:45,430 --> 00:40:52,420
indifference were often deeply anchored in a pre-modern context of Muslim imperial sovereignty.

334
00:40:53,470 --> 00:40:59,680
This did not mean, of course, that television Muslim scholars were somehow stuck in the pre-modern word to the exact contrary.

335
00:41:00,490 --> 00:41:05,469
The persistence of an imperial Muslim political theology was intimately bound to the conditions,

336
00:41:05,470 --> 00:41:11,560
expectations and pressures of colonial modernity for a deracinated, colonised minority.

337
00:41:12,010 --> 00:41:15,430
This moment was saturated with these anxieties of recovering the distant,

338
00:41:15,430 --> 00:41:22,900
yet urgently attractive fantasy of sovereign problem and with the impossibility of its own sovereignty.

339
00:41:23,080 --> 00:41:28,270
And this is a crucial point for me with the impossibility of political sovereignty.

340
00:41:29,050 --> 00:41:36,940
This desire for sovereign power was increasingly exercised in the realm of everyday ritual,

341
00:41:37,240 --> 00:41:43,809
like through the drive to preserve and maintain markers of Muslim distinction,

342
00:41:43,810 --> 00:41:49,690
what are called Shia Islam or Shia order Islam, the singular meaning,

343
00:41:49,690 --> 00:41:57,220
ritual practices and affective visions of everyday life that distinguish religious identity and difference in the public sphere.

344
00:41:58,030 --> 00:42:04,300
How is this sort of just rubric examples? One of the most fascinating moments.

345
00:42:06,390 --> 00:42:14,940
Of intra Muslim contest on the boundaries of Hindu-Muslim relations concern the context of the philosopher movement in the early 20th century.

346
00:42:15,360 --> 00:42:18,809
That, of course, Professor David Yu has written extensively and brilliantly about introverts.

347
00:42:18,810 --> 00:42:20,430
But I have benefited tremendously from.

348
00:42:21,150 --> 00:42:28,560
So one of the classic movement's most famous protagonists, the renowned Muslim scholar Abu Mazen, died in 1958, was among Gandhi's major allies.

349
00:42:28,890 --> 00:42:34,170
And later, a key intellectual architect of the Indian constitution had called on Indian Muslims to

350
00:42:34,170 --> 00:42:38,730
actively collaborate with Gandhi and the Indian National Congress non-cooperation movement.

351
00:42:39,120 --> 00:42:45,269
But severing all civic ties with the colonial state in a detailed text peppered with Arabic

352
00:42:45,270 --> 00:42:50,640
references pointedly titled The Arabian Peninsula scheduled an Arab composed in 1920,

353
00:42:51,300 --> 00:42:54,990
Azhar drew on two intensely contested verses in the Koran,

354
00:42:55,560 --> 00:43:03,629
verses eight and nine of Chapter 60 album of relevant parts of which read as follows God does not

355
00:43:03,630 --> 00:43:09,000
submit you from showing kindness to those unbelievers who do not fight you on account of good faith,

356
00:43:09,390 --> 00:43:16,500
and neither drive you forward from your homes. God only forbids you to stand in friendship towards those unbeliever,

357
00:43:16,500 --> 00:43:23,250
to go fight against you because of your faith and drive you forth from your homes or eat others in driving the fort.

358
00:43:23,430 --> 00:43:30,870
And of course, now, in the context of colonial India that argued Hindus represented the first category of non-Muslims mentioned in these verses since

359
00:43:30,870 --> 00:43:37,050
they had never attacked Muslim countries for them in religion or been the cause of the expulsion of Muslims from their lands.

360
00:43:37,560 --> 00:43:42,420
In stark contrast, the British with the designs to colonise Arabia and destroy the Ottoman Caliphate,

361
00:43:42,780 --> 00:43:47,729
exemplified non-Muslims of the second ability those who fought Muslims into religion and expelled them from their

362
00:43:47,730 --> 00:43:54,540
homes as arts program of marrying inter-religious hospitality with anti-colonial activism met stiff resistance.

363
00:43:54,540 --> 00:44:02,790
However, for instance, the towering late 19th and early 20th century traditionalist scholar Ahmad Reza Horn, founder of the school in South Asia,

364
00:44:03,090 --> 00:44:09,480
was furious with Assad and his with movement colleagues and their push for Hindu-Muslim friendship and collaboration.

365
00:44:10,110 --> 00:44:11,549
He counter argued that to begin,

366
00:44:11,550 --> 00:44:16,680
the Ottoman state cannot be understood as a legitimate caliphate since it lacked prophetic lineage or more specifically,

367
00:44:16,920 --> 00:44:19,950
the lineage of the Prophet's tribe, the Kurdish.

368
00:44:20,760 --> 00:44:23,880
But most critically, most relevant to the argument I've been trying to develop here.

369
00:44:24,510 --> 00:44:32,040
Can't disagree with what you called and saw as the encouragement of Hindu-Muslim intimacy and friendship in the public sphere.

370
00:44:32,910 --> 00:44:37,049
Not only was that wrong in characterising Hindus as a community that had never attacked

371
00:44:37,050 --> 00:44:41,010
Muslims for the certainly had done so during multiple episodes of communal violence,

372
00:44:41,400 --> 00:44:46,680
but most significantly, legitimating Hindu-Muslim friendship left vulnerable to erasure.

373
00:44:47,310 --> 00:44:52,240
Public markers of Muslim distinction in Islam era.

374
00:44:52,320 --> 00:44:56,479
Islam in Urdu. Persian. Kohn was especially limited, for instance,

375
00:44:56,480 --> 00:45:03,559
when leaders of the climate movement once invited Gandhi to a mosque on a certain Friday to address the congregants handing over to a Hindu leader.

376
00:45:03,560 --> 00:45:08,060
The elevated and coveted site of the summit exemplified an attitude of disregard

377
00:45:08,060 --> 00:45:12,800
for markers of Muslim distinction that in the absence of political sovereignty,

378
00:45:13,070 --> 00:45:19,670
indexed sovereign power and the promise of preserving religious identity against the threat of competing ideas.

379
00:45:20,300 --> 00:45:21,830
So in contrast to Azad,

380
00:45:22,250 --> 00:45:29,000
who had connected interreligious friendship with a political horizon that exceeded the nation state in the figure of the caliphate,

381
00:45:29,750 --> 00:45:37,970
Khan located Muslim sovereign power squarely in the realm of ritual practice and the choreography of the everyday.

382
00:45:38,660 --> 00:45:44,720
For the latter, it was not the resurrection of any notion of a muslim state, colourful or otherwise,

383
00:45:45,050 --> 00:45:50,510
but the cultivation of embodied markers of Muslim distinction in the public sphere

384
00:45:50,840 --> 00:45:56,420
that enshrined the imperial fantasy of sovereignty in the ruins of Empire.

385
00:45:57,200 --> 00:46:00,740
So the point being this for both deep thinkers, friendship,

386
00:46:01,220 --> 00:46:07,880
its promise in the case of Azhar or its better in the case of Khan was saturated with power.

387
00:46:08,630 --> 00:46:15,470
But how to imagine the interaction between friendship, power and politics was diametrically opposed.

388
00:46:16,340 --> 00:46:23,090
Example two And then I will close another issue of contention that best crystallised this point was that of Gul sacrifice,

389
00:46:23,090 --> 00:46:29,990
arguably the most vexatious subject of dispute among the Indian Muslim scholarly elite in the early 20th century, exactly one century ago.

390
00:46:30,500 --> 00:46:32,569
For that matter, recently,

391
00:46:32,570 --> 00:46:40,670
Hindu nationalists discourses in majority Indian violence directed against minorities like Muslims and Dalits as part of the protection movement,

392
00:46:40,670 --> 00:46:45,200
have attracted tremendous scholarly and journalistic attention as well as alarm.

393
00:46:46,220 --> 00:46:50,280
But investing, affective and political attachment in the body of the cult as an index and

394
00:46:50,290 --> 00:46:54,260
marker of religious purity and superiority is not a solely Hindu phenomenon.

395
00:46:54,890 --> 00:47:02,510
The couple has represented a site of tremendous anxiety and opportunity for competing groups of prominent South Asian Muslim scholars as well.

396
00:47:02,870 --> 00:47:05,330
For at least a century, for instance,

397
00:47:06,080 --> 00:47:14,390
the leaders of the Khilafat movement surged extension from cow sacrifice as a gesture of inter-religious hospitality towards the Hindu community.

398
00:47:15,500 --> 00:47:21,320
This gesture of obedience, they argued, was crucial for forging a robust political alliance with the Hindus against the British,

399
00:47:22,190 --> 00:47:31,370
though their argument was based not on some abstract appeal to pluralism, but on a specific reading of the Islamic legal tradition.

400
00:47:32,030 --> 00:47:40,550
Drawing on the observation that real sacrifice is not an obligatory rajib, but only if permissible mobile practice in Islamic law.

401
00:47:41,000 --> 00:47:43,850
Hence refraining from exposed nor normative pitfalls,

402
00:47:44,330 --> 00:47:52,520
Indian Muslims can easily substitute cows with goats and sheep for adequate sacrifice in both everyday life and on devotional occasions like eat.

403
00:47:53,480 --> 00:47:58,070
This proposal, however, left opposing scholars like Mohammad Reza aghast again.

404
00:47:58,100 --> 00:48:05,959
Of particular interest is the reasoning that went into his protest abstaining from power sacrifice a ritual known to be a distinguishing

405
00:48:05,960 --> 00:48:16,070
marker of Muslim identity in colonial India under the coercion or pressure of Hindus amounted to the shame and humiliation of Muslims,

406
00:48:16,550 --> 00:48:25,430
an outcome that was and people due to the underlying motif of the Sharia establishing Muslim dominance over non-Muslims.

407
00:48:26,240 --> 00:48:32,600
Yet I must avert a potential misreading while articulating and presuming an imperial Muslim political theology.

408
00:48:33,200 --> 00:48:39,740
It is not as if Reza Khan was some unhinged, exclusivist, oblivious to the reality of British colonial power either.

409
00:48:40,550 --> 00:48:46,130
Exactly. To the contrary, he was not only keenly aware of British colonial power,

410
00:48:46,850 --> 00:48:51,830
but all too closely attuned to the opportunities and benefits afforded by that power.

411
00:48:52,220 --> 00:48:58,490
So, for instance, when arguing for the preservation of Muslim markers of distinction Shahida Islam,

412
00:48:59,450 --> 00:49:05,530
Khan frequently invoked the colonial promise of tolerance and policy of tolerance towards individual

413
00:49:05,540 --> 00:49:12,200
religious communities and of the commitment of the colonial state to ensuring the freedom of religion.

414
00:49:13,070 --> 00:49:16,610
Pressuring Indian Muslims to abstain from cow sacrifice, he often proclaimed,

415
00:49:16,630 --> 00:49:22,370
and I'm quoting him, represented an abomination that the colonial authorities should never allow.

416
00:49:23,520 --> 00:49:30,749
Similarly, on the other hand, it is not as if scholars attached to the synoptic movement who argued for Hindu-Muslim

417
00:49:30,750 --> 00:49:35,489
collaboration and friendship were some open ended plural lives unavailable

418
00:49:35,490 --> 00:49:40,080
for uninterested or uninterested in the normative potency of traditionalist

419
00:49:40,500 --> 00:49:45,270
hermeneutical logics anchored in the assumption and context of Muslim empire.

420
00:49:45,990 --> 00:49:51,330
Take, for instance, the position of arguably the most intellectually formidable protagonist.

421
00:49:51,900 --> 00:49:58,770
Maulvi Abdul Bodhi died in 1926 who was associated with the famous Ferengi School of Muslim Traditionalism in South Asia,

422
00:49:59,130 --> 00:50:03,600
known for its emphasis on rationalist disciplines like logic and philosophy.

423
00:50:05,010 --> 00:50:08,370
Even by urging abstinence from cow sacrifice,

424
00:50:08,970 --> 00:50:19,440
Abdul body was at pains to emphasise that such abstention should not issue forth under the pressure or coercion of any non-Muslim community.

425
00:50:19,890 --> 00:50:29,340
Why? Because suppressing a public marker of Muslim distinction involuntarily under any pressure or coercion

426
00:50:30,000 --> 00:50:36,750
contravened the imperial political theology in forming the normative ethos and parameters of Sharia,

427
00:50:37,800 --> 00:50:47,460
but no normative landmines included. If, for purposes of sacrifice, one replaced cows with other animals like sheep and goats of one's own volition.

428
00:50:48,420 --> 00:50:54,400
The most interesting thing here was that Bodhi anchored his whole case for refraining from cow

429
00:50:54,420 --> 00:51:01,860
sacrifice on the very category of public markers of Muslim distinction that the opponents of this view,

430
00:51:01,860 --> 00:51:07,650
like Ahmed Rajan, had mobilised to argue for the necessity of sacrifice, including India.

431
00:51:07,920 --> 00:51:18,150
How? By claiming that the caliphate represented a far more critical and monumental marker of Muslim distinction than cow sacrifice.

432
00:51:18,870 --> 00:51:22,320
As he bitterly and cunningly put it and I quoting here.

433
00:51:23,010 --> 00:51:26,190
What is the cow when put next to the cattle?

434
00:51:27,480 --> 00:51:32,520
Both these examples I have briefly described highlight a vexing conundrum on which I will end.

435
00:51:33,120 --> 00:51:41,579
That conundrum is this How should one imagine and engage the legacy of dominant, pre-modern,

436
00:51:41,580 --> 00:51:49,770
normative attitudes on Muslim non-Muslim relations and friendship in a world in which the very

437
00:51:49,770 --> 00:51:58,830
political context of Muslim imperial sovereignty that informed those attitudes is no longer available.

438
00:51:59,850 --> 00:52:08,639
But paradoxically, what I've tried to show today is that despite or perhaps because of the absence of Muslim political

439
00:52:08,640 --> 00:52:14,610
sovereignty at stake and work in these interpretive contestations over Hindu-Muslim friendship,

440
00:52:15,180 --> 00:52:22,380
what precisely the logic and promise of an imperial Muslim political commission?

441
00:52:22,940 --> 00:52:26,970
And indeed, thank you for your patience. But thank you so much, Shirley.

442
00:52:27,000 --> 00:52:40,319
And, you know, like, this has really been a sort of vista into a series of debates on the theme of today's seminar that I mean,

443
00:52:40,320 --> 00:52:52,320
it really is a fascinating insight of goings on in the Indian subcontinent in the last 150 years or so in ways that really illuminate,

444
00:52:52,320 --> 00:52:57,750
I think, the the as you put it, the promise and the perils of friendship, as it were.

445
00:52:58,650 --> 00:53:03,000
And I want to open up the floor for any questions.

446
00:53:03,000 --> 00:53:07,140
I just want to remind the audience members, if you have any queries, please feel free to ask.

447
00:53:08,040 --> 00:53:11,580
But Fazal, with yourself sort of here,

448
00:53:11,850 --> 00:53:20,700
I may actually start off by asking if you have any comments that you want to put to either or sharada on their wonderful presentations.

449
00:53:21,610 --> 00:53:25,190
Well, thanks very much and thank you both generally.

450
00:53:25,830 --> 00:53:34,500
I'm sorry I missed a bit of nuance talk because I was detained in London by a panel that started late and ended late,

451
00:53:35,940 --> 00:53:40,980
but I made it for the substance of it and a really wonderful quality.

452
00:53:41,640 --> 00:53:45,120
I've got both presentations on reading.

453
00:53:45,550 --> 00:53:52,090
Well, no, I just let me start with you and I'll move to you.

454
00:53:53,520 --> 00:53:57,360
I love this idea of Siddartha as defining friendship because, of course.

455
00:53:59,940 --> 00:54:03,720
In its form. It's a gift. It's voluntary. It's discretionary.

456
00:54:03,960 --> 00:54:06,210
And yet it's also necessary at the same time.

457
00:54:06,210 --> 00:54:13,710
And I want to ask you about the relationship between what is discretionary and voluntarily and voluntarily given on the one hand,

458
00:54:13,710 --> 00:54:21,960
and the necessity that it implies on the other, because friendship, as you laid out, involves a necessity for society.

459
00:54:21,960 --> 00:54:25,560
And this seems to be mirrored in what you're saying about the figure of the king.

460
00:54:25,570 --> 00:54:32,050
So the king. Cannot be a friend, and yet he must exist in order for friendship to exist.

461
00:54:32,350 --> 00:54:39,220
And the King guarantees the possibility of friendship, but is removed from it in some ways at the same time.

462
00:54:39,670 --> 00:54:46,420
And I wanted to ask you whether this removal is also.

463
00:54:48,680 --> 00:54:58,670
One of the things it does is just to towards the king sovereignty, you know, something that Johnny was talking about in a different time and place.

464
00:54:59,990 --> 00:55:04,940
And the king really needs to be an external force as a sovereign figure.

465
00:55:06,650 --> 00:55:09,860
So he is inside and out at the same time.

466
00:55:10,640 --> 00:55:17,420
But doesn't the king also perhaps not have Bobby or need friends?

467
00:55:17,420 --> 00:55:28,430
Because as far as I can tell, in the kind of medieval tradition of political theory saying the mayors of princes literature,

468
00:55:28,760 --> 00:55:31,790
it's not something I know anything about in my research.

469
00:55:31,880 --> 00:55:36,740
I'm just parroting what I read. The figure of the boon companion, the king's friend.

470
00:55:37,220 --> 00:55:38,930
His friends are very, very important.

471
00:55:38,930 --> 00:55:47,509
And I'm just wondering whether these friends are also and were friends of a different variety than the kind of friendship you were talking about.

472
00:55:47,510 --> 00:55:52,940
Your friendship with the king is premised upon something other first.

473
00:55:52,940 --> 00:56:00,620
Of course, it's a problem in its own right. How can you be a friend of the King's if you're unequal and it's a problem for the King because of

474
00:56:00,620 --> 00:56:09,530
the king's possible loss of his own sovereignty by depending on the love of or for his friends.

475
00:56:10,430 --> 00:56:15,110
But it just made me think of that when you think about it as your writing about the king and friendship,

476
00:56:15,650 --> 00:56:23,360
whether that kind of friendship that he's talking about is necessarily outside the normative conception of virtue,

477
00:56:23,930 --> 00:56:29,390
that you describe the totality of that, because after all, it requires.

478
00:56:30,880 --> 00:56:37,940
War, wine, drinking, women, all of the things which are not part of the two categories of friendship here.

479
00:56:37,960 --> 00:56:42,070
What's. And you may have talked about it before I arrived.

480
00:56:43,450 --> 00:56:47,070
Could you just say some more about it and then I'll come to John? Sure.

481
00:56:47,840 --> 00:56:52,479
And thank you so much for this fantastic question.

482
00:56:52,480 --> 00:56:56,590
And this is exactly what I was on with, though.

483
00:56:56,590 --> 00:57:04,990
He did try to distinguish between what he what he calls as real friendship or just interest in interesting friendship and companionship.

484
00:57:05,590 --> 00:57:10,360
And then so or a being a acquaintance.

485
00:57:10,690 --> 00:57:18,330
So what he was trying to do is like obviously there was an explicit criticism to the institution of kinship.

486
00:57:18,980 --> 00:57:29,260
That that became a new institution during the pre and the brief period that we saw a change in the concept of polity,

487
00:57:29,770 --> 00:57:42,669
a change of the structure of polity in the period the Abbasid caliphate became weakened and the boyhood which and who were and Shia minority,

488
00:57:42,670 --> 00:57:47,350
they came from the Salem area and Iran and they ruled the Islamic caliphate.

489
00:57:47,830 --> 00:57:55,900
But these boys are the rulers. They couldn't claim their kinship on the basis of prophetic succession.

490
00:57:56,320 --> 00:58:00,850
And they were actually also not very welcomed by the Sunni majority of society.

491
00:58:01,060 --> 00:58:10,000
So they were seen in somewhat as outsiders to the rest of the population or to the rest of the society in Baghdad.

492
00:58:10,540 --> 00:58:13,599
In addition to that, they were not interested themselves.

493
00:58:13,600 --> 00:58:20,110
The kinship, the king or the institute, the institution of kinship in itself.

494
00:58:20,560 --> 00:58:25,000
Kings were not interested in making the friendship with the rest of society.

495
00:58:25,300 --> 00:58:26,620
They wanted to be always.

496
00:58:26,620 --> 00:58:36,640
That outsider is the institution that can control and manipulate all the other groups and all the other competing groups in society.

497
00:58:37,120 --> 00:58:45,340
So what was that, though he did? Trying to say is like these things we're only interested in their own self-interest

498
00:58:45,670 --> 00:58:53,490
in the in the in well in combining wealth in their own desires in them.

499
00:58:54,400 --> 00:58:58,840
It like aggression, a power it says.

500
00:58:59,170 --> 00:59:02,530
So for that they are not suitable to be friends.

501
00:59:02,560 --> 00:59:08,770
No one can be friends with them because the one important element in his understanding of friendship,

502
00:59:08,770 --> 00:59:13,240
in addition to social intellect, nature and morals, is the trust.

503
00:59:13,690 --> 00:59:24,849
You cannot trust them. You can't have a relationship of intimacy because it's you should be able to reveal your inner self with your friend.

504
00:59:24,850 --> 00:59:31,060
And this is missing from this friendship with these and with these things.

505
00:59:31,300 --> 00:59:37,000
Obviously, they can have companions, they can have acquaintances, but they can't.

506
00:59:37,280 --> 00:59:46,990
They are they are they cannot be qualified or morally elevated to be to reach the rank of friendship that he was talking about.

507
00:59:47,410 --> 01:00:00,040
But he actually and was also promoting his own his own intellectual works, meaning he was trying to argue for the place of intellectuals in society.

508
01:00:00,310 --> 01:00:05,230
So what he was trying to say that if these things like the vizier had been said,

509
01:00:05,230 --> 01:00:11,500
then where to become interested in knowledge and where to embrace the people of

510
01:00:11,500 --> 01:00:17,710
knowledge and ask for their advice and welcome them and and select the right companion.

511
01:00:18,280 --> 01:00:24,250
They will be able to purify themselves through knowledge and they will get the right advice.

512
01:00:24,430 --> 01:00:31,920
And then they become a ruler of friends. Also there is a possibility there is a road down.

513
01:00:32,110 --> 01:00:46,379
That's why yes, there is a possibility. But the responsibility is somewhat confined or conditioned and on their willingness to control their

514
01:00:46,380 --> 01:00:54,600
passion and to control their self interest and to to yet to control their self interest and passion.

515
01:00:55,670 --> 01:01:05,120
Thanks very much. So turning now to security again, the discussion of sovereignty in that very rich paper.

516
01:01:06,050 --> 01:01:09,680
I was wondering what you were saying.

517
01:01:12,530 --> 01:01:17,090
I mean, you're describing the socialisation of celebrity in the absence of empire.

518
01:01:18,740 --> 01:01:23,080
But do you think something else is happening there as well, in addition to being socialised?

519
01:01:23,090 --> 01:01:26,140
It is, as it were, islamised in a certain way.

520
01:01:26,150 --> 01:01:34,660
So it might have been part of the language of siesta earlier, and now it is made to fit in the language of Judea.

521
01:01:36,320 --> 01:01:41,270
I'm not drawing an absolute distinction between those two categories, but I think it's important nevertheless,

522
01:01:42,200 --> 01:01:49,520
because of the authorities who are making this pronouncements, their authority is not based on anything that a principal thought it would be based on.

523
01:01:50,120 --> 01:02:02,330
So I wonder if that is also happening and if that is the case, then, you know, you have a new imperium of the faith who created so.

524
01:02:04,820 --> 01:02:12,840
If you could elaborate on that. On the issue of the conflict.

525
01:02:12,890 --> 01:02:22,580
I just found it fascinating that the standard Urdu translation of non-cooperation is stuck in Malala, as you know,

526
01:02:23,900 --> 01:02:34,280
and yet it's used completely differently from the English non-cooperation or any other Indian term, because cooperation is certainly not friendship.

527
01:02:35,660 --> 01:02:38,420
And when Gandhi talks about non-cooperation,

528
01:02:39,140 --> 01:02:44,840
he thinks that to not cooperate with the British actually involves the greatest amount of friendship for the British,

529
01:02:45,470 --> 01:02:51,650
that in refusing cooperation with them, you are performing a sacrifice for yourself.

530
01:02:51,800 --> 01:02:59,360
I mean, you lose, you lose out. And in doing so, you offer the hand of friendship to your opponent.

531
01:03:00,500 --> 01:03:07,639
So you give them the opportunity to to claim friendship, but the friendship that you're offering.

532
01:03:07,640 --> 01:03:11,690
So in a way, the refusal to cooperate and friendship go together.

533
01:03:11,870 --> 01:03:22,759
For Gandhi. And I suppose you can read that as another way in which sovereignty gets to be linked and be linked with friendship.

534
01:03:22,760 --> 01:03:24,590
And yet, as I am still close to going.

535
01:03:25,610 --> 01:03:36,350
Use this knuckleball wallop in your and your telling of it in a completely different way in which this issue of refusal to cooperate,

536
01:03:36,740 --> 01:03:41,240
leading to friendship does not seem to be that available.

537
01:03:41,240 --> 01:03:44,900
And I wonder why why that might be the case.

538
01:03:45,230 --> 01:03:57,290
On on the caliph in Macao, of course, there's that Gandhi, too, as that wonderful saying where he says that the caliph is the most.

539
01:03:57,710 --> 01:04:03,620
So the caliph is the Muslim cow. So he actually makes a comparison between the holy cow.

540
01:04:04,040 --> 01:04:08,900
They sound sort of like the same kind of sound in English anyway.

541
01:04:09,320 --> 01:04:17,870
And he's not suggesting that the same thing or the equivalents that could be exchanged, the commodity exchanges,

542
01:04:19,100 --> 01:04:22,740
but precisely because they are unlike each other and an equal,

543
01:04:23,090 --> 01:04:28,070
they can enter into a relationship and that one can be literally exchange for the other.

544
01:04:28,100 --> 01:04:33,770
So again, what strikes me is that I'm a Christian and others of your being fighting.

545
01:04:34,680 --> 01:04:43,320
I refuse to look at that kind of reasoning or it seems not to have any weight on them so that they are reading the kind of,

546
01:04:43,530 --> 01:04:47,610
say, Gandhi was the most prominent advocate for this kind of thing.

547
01:04:49,140 --> 01:04:53,940
They are reading him in terms of their own categories, but.

548
01:04:55,360 --> 01:04:59,980
In such a way as not to read him at all. And it's that refusal that I.

549
01:05:01,230 --> 01:05:07,740
Is it? I'm standing on both sides. FARZAD Who should have known better and did know better.

550
01:05:08,130 --> 01:05:17,760
And for Assad's own opponents, there's a kind of unwillingness or an inability or a refusal to actually accept.

551
01:05:18,660 --> 01:05:26,690
The terms of the argument, even though they are constantly arguing with each other in the most sophisticated and nuanced rate,

552
01:05:26,730 --> 01:05:30,150
as you describe them both very, very fast.

553
01:05:30,440 --> 01:05:34,200
Thank you so much for that sense. You know, in the first point, you know,

554
01:05:34,200 --> 01:05:42,029
one of the things that I've been interested in is precisely this question of these seemingly illiberal actors like Amadeus Han

555
01:05:42,030 --> 01:05:48,359
and other sort of scholars contemporaneous to him who might be in opposing camps like the pioneers of the Deoband movement,

556
01:05:48,360 --> 01:05:56,610
who are so invested in these questions of the everyday. Why does everyday life become so charged by the late 19th century?

557
01:05:56,610 --> 01:06:05,579
And these questions of the celebration of the Prophet's birthday or the question of, you know, distributing food on the third day of the deceased,

558
01:06:05,580 --> 01:06:13,200
and these questions of intimacies between different religions in the public sphere and this whole question of preserving the markers of Muslim

559
01:06:13,200 --> 01:06:21,120
distinction in everyday life to not see this kind of preoccupation as apolitical or to retreat to the private sphere or to retreat from politics,

560
01:06:21,120 --> 01:06:24,780
but rather as deeply political, but rather exactly as you put it,

561
01:06:25,110 --> 01:06:30,750
compensating for that lost political sovereignty precisely in a different domain of politics.

562
01:06:30,960 --> 01:06:38,130
That is, in some ways, Islamism sovereignty. The nice way of putting it in that precisely the everyday becomes a sphere saturated

563
01:06:38,130 --> 01:06:43,740
with the promise of sovereign power in the absence of political sovereignty.

564
01:06:44,910 --> 01:06:51,030
And as you have pointed out in your book on the climate movement, that for many of the political protagonists,

565
01:06:51,420 --> 01:06:55,110
you know, this was not a movement to live under the Ottoman caliphate.

566
01:06:55,410 --> 01:06:59,520
I think that's a very interesting point, that this was not a movement that we want to live under the Ottoman caliphate,

567
01:06:59,520 --> 01:07:07,860
but rather it represented a form of politics that exceeds the nation state and that also exceeds the actual Ottoman caliphate itself.

568
01:07:07,890 --> 01:07:21,000
So these are horizons of politics that that emerged in the in after political sovereignty and the competing articulations of sovereignty,

569
01:07:21,000 --> 01:07:25,900
but nonetheless, both grappling with the aftermath of sovereign power on the question.

570
01:07:25,950 --> 01:07:30,479
The second question that you that you raised is very interesting on on a lot and

571
01:07:30,480 --> 01:07:34,860
how it is collapsed with friendship and the thought of some other than others.

572
01:07:35,670 --> 01:07:41,760
The interesting thing here is that on this particular point, someone like Gandhi and some others are contractually exploiting the agreement.

573
01:07:42,420 --> 01:07:53,549
And that someone it is also precisely the problem that he has is with this point of collapsing more a lot with friendship with the British,

574
01:07:53,550 --> 01:07:59,100
to the point that he makes is that we ought to make a distinction between friendship or substantive friendship.

575
01:08:00,090 --> 01:08:06,549
And mere transactional relations. And you ought to continue mere transactional relations with the British,

576
01:08:06,550 --> 01:08:11,470
taking funding for our schools and all those kinds of things that ought to through which we

577
01:08:11,470 --> 01:08:16,390
ought to maintain our everyday life and our existence as a functioning community of Muslims.

578
01:08:16,840 --> 01:08:19,630
But we don't need to engage in substantive friendship with them.

579
01:08:20,260 --> 01:08:26,499
So when you collapse while out with substantive friendship and start giving away a lot what you're basically is doing,

580
01:08:26,500 --> 01:08:31,479
what basically you're doing is you're inviting catastrophe and socioeconomic hardship on your own self,

581
01:08:31,480 --> 01:08:34,830
which will eventually benefit the, quote unquote Hindu community and Gandhi.

582
01:08:34,840 --> 01:08:41,530
So this basically, he argues, is a catastrophic ruse that has been planted by Gandhi in the minds of people like us, all that others.

583
01:08:42,070 --> 01:08:49,670
So he makes an interesting point that we should, in fact engage in a practice of masked French, a masked friendship with the British,

584
01:08:49,670 --> 01:08:53,920
and that you're not actually showing substantive friendship and militarily mere transactional relations,

585
01:08:54,310 --> 01:09:00,760
but mask a certain kind of friendship that is not apparent, but is but you keep it masked in some ways.

586
01:09:00,760 --> 01:09:05,170
It's close to the idea of a certain kind of a Sunni Turkey of friendship with the British.

587
01:09:06,190 --> 01:09:12,250
So but this is precisely the kind of collapse of this category with substantive friendship that is also bothering someone like Ahmed.

588
01:09:13,450 --> 01:09:22,960
And this kind of slipperiness of these categories is precisely what makes them ambiguous and productive, but also threatening to the different actors.

589
01:09:23,980 --> 01:09:29,200
But I just the last point I want to make is that even within the climate movement, I think, you know, as you have explored,

590
01:09:29,680 --> 01:09:34,660
there is this interesting shades of nuance between a figure like Assad and a figure like Abdul Mahdi,

591
01:09:34,990 --> 01:09:43,210
in the opinion of the body, is much more attentive to addressing the kind of normative sensibilities of a Hanafi traditionalist.

592
01:09:43,540 --> 01:09:50,380
And to make sure that those sensibilities are not traded on and are addressed in a more deliberate fashion,

593
01:09:50,860 --> 01:09:55,000
but are somewhat like other reports of Azhar Ali and all those kinds of pre-modern figures.

594
01:09:55,360 --> 01:10:00,190
He can take certain leaps in certain kinds of licenses.

595
01:10:00,760 --> 01:10:05,680
For example, on the whole question of does the Caliph need to be of, then you're very open by saying,

596
01:10:05,680 --> 01:10:08,140
no, he doesn't need to be, because this started as a kind of choice.

597
01:10:08,380 --> 01:10:12,430
Many of the killings have not had that lineage, and that is something that does not have historical precedents.

598
01:10:12,910 --> 01:10:21,010
That is something the body would not argue. So within the movement, that is interesting temperaments that we find those sort of beautiful nuances,

599
01:10:21,340 --> 01:10:30,700
but also need to be kept in mind as I just just an ending comment that which is icons

600
01:10:30,700 --> 01:10:36,730
argument in many ways gets to be the most to me argument in the Pakistan movement,

601
01:10:37,420 --> 01:10:44,620
which views this movement as precisely a ruse to impoverish Muslims.

602
01:10:46,180 --> 01:10:49,509
You know, they quit the assembly. They quit colleges and schools.

603
01:10:49,510 --> 01:10:52,900
They quit their law practices, and they moved down in the world.

604
01:10:53,380 --> 01:10:55,840
And then they become slaves of the looks of it.

605
01:10:57,550 --> 01:11:05,320
But the Muslim League, it's not about the [INAUDIBLE] out of Islam or whatever, but it's about a conspiracy.

606
01:11:05,710 --> 01:11:08,860
Exactly. In which they lose, they lose power.

607
01:11:09,190 --> 01:11:14,490
And I think it's. Should I take the opportunity to ask?

608
01:11:15,020 --> 01:11:19,999
So I had my own set of questions. Now we have about 15 minutes left.

609
01:11:20,000 --> 01:11:27,829
So unfortunately we can't address all of our curiosity, but I'm sure these conversations will keep on going through well beyond this evening.

610
01:11:27,830 --> 01:11:32,120
I wanted to start with a question for her, which I you know,

611
01:11:32,120 --> 01:11:38,540
I found an amusing sort of moment in your lecture where you were talking about friendship with enemies.

612
01:11:39,020 --> 01:11:49,940
And it made me go back to a line in The Godfather, which is attributed to I think this is typically a segment of Don Corleone or something like this.

613
01:11:49,940 --> 01:11:53,090
You know, keep your friends close and your enemies closer.

614
01:11:53,510 --> 01:11:58,820
And I was kind of wondering, like, what does friendship with enemies mean in this sort of a context in particular?

615
01:12:00,500 --> 01:12:10,219
Because I assume it's in the context you were speaking about to do with recognising that you need to have relations with people,

616
01:12:10,220 --> 01:12:17,330
with you need to maintain some diplomatic relations, perhaps with people who are potential threats to you ultimately.

617
01:12:18,830 --> 01:12:25,880
But it also kind of hearken back in my mind, obviously, to Haiti is earlier than a figure like Machiavelli,

618
01:12:26,360 --> 01:12:36,050
but to the kind of, I guess the Renaissance post renaissance never for princes literature,

619
01:12:36,380 --> 01:12:43,100
because I think I kind of associate with the sort of person who is hanging out with the court

620
01:12:43,220 --> 01:12:50,180
and in a sense providing as well as entertaining discourse advice of a sort for the court.

621
01:12:50,900 --> 01:12:52,250
So that was one dimension of the question.

622
01:12:52,250 --> 01:13:02,510
And the other dimension is, is there any conception into Haiti that there can be friendship with members of the opposite sex?

623
01:13:03,350 --> 01:13:10,159
And whether there could be friendship with it is one's relation with one spouse too hierarchical in that context,

624
01:13:10,160 --> 01:13:13,550
with one's wife going to be a relationship of friendship.

625
01:13:15,080 --> 01:13:21,400
So in a sense, three questions, but thank you. Thank you for these very interesting questions.

626
01:13:21,410 --> 01:13:25,220
I'm going to start with the last question, actually, which I also find them.

627
01:13:26,600 --> 01:13:35,809
Yeah, very, very creative. And I think he doesn't address the friendship between a man and a woman in the sense that you're talking about,

628
01:13:35,810 --> 01:13:38,890
that he actually talks about a relationship.

629
01:13:39,380 --> 01:13:42,740
He talks about romantic love. And he says that.

630
01:13:43,310 --> 01:13:50,360
And he talks about it in a in a quote that I don't remember exactly, but I remember the context.

631
01:13:50,360 --> 01:13:58,729
He talks about the Bedouin and a Bedouin love for a woman and that for his wife and this love for his wife should.

632
01:13:58,730 --> 01:14:09,330
And if there is if there is a if if you are faced with a choice between between a choosing romantic love, your love for the wife and your French,

633
01:14:09,380 --> 01:14:15,920
your friend, you have to choose your friend because your relationship with your wife is based on passion.

634
01:14:16,640 --> 01:14:27,410
And while the relationship with with the friend is actually based on reason and based on choice.

635
01:14:27,830 --> 01:14:33,050
So you have made the choice and you have duties towards your friends.

636
01:14:34,070 --> 01:14:40,280
And you have to maintain a friendship. Therefore, you have to choose your friend over your life.

637
01:14:41,630 --> 01:14:44,930
Very counter to what exactly.

638
01:14:45,170 --> 01:14:52,340
And that is actually it is a very interesting view because it reminds me of a story in Khalilah within the Bible,

639
01:14:52,340 --> 01:14:55,730
a thought if you know the story, the monkey and the turtle.

640
01:14:58,220 --> 01:15:09,920
Okay. So it's a very interesting story that there is a monkey that who used to live in an isolated land and like in an oasis and a turtle,

641
01:15:10,640 --> 01:15:20,600
he swam and the monkey every time he would shake the tree and some kind of fruit will fall down and and the turtle will take the food and would eat.

642
01:15:20,600 --> 01:15:26,360
So the turtle assumed that actually the monkey is doing that on purpose to feed him.

643
01:15:26,630 --> 01:15:30,590
So he felt like that the monkey was trying to to have a friendship with the bears.

644
01:15:31,460 --> 01:15:35,510
And then the turtle developed a very strong friendship with the monkey.

645
01:15:35,510 --> 01:15:43,630
And to the extent this distracted distracted the monkey from his wife and the wife became very jealous because of the absence,

646
01:15:43,880 --> 01:15:47,870
the absence of the husband who started to spend a lot of time with the monkey.

647
01:15:48,290 --> 01:15:55,549
And then she should have had anxiety about this relationship between the character and the monkey.

648
01:15:55,550 --> 01:16:05,690
And then the neighbour advised the wife to bring the turtle wife to pretend that she is sick and she will only be cured if she eats a monkeys heart.

649
01:16:07,250 --> 01:16:10,430
And then the turtle was in dilemma.

650
01:16:10,580 --> 01:16:13,580
I mean, what how what does he what would he do?

651
01:16:13,640 --> 01:16:17,580
He's going to lose a good wife. And is he going to deceive his friends?

652
01:16:17,580 --> 01:16:19,520
So what is the right thing to do?

653
01:16:19,940 --> 01:16:30,290
But then after a period of contemplation, the turtle goes back to the monkey, and then he tries to deceive the monkey.

654
01:16:31,070 --> 01:16:35,270
And to tell him that, okay, I want to take you to visit my house.

655
01:16:35,960 --> 01:16:43,940
And then the the monkey jumped on the turtle's back, and then the turtle was going back home with the monkey.

656
01:16:44,120 --> 01:16:47,360
And the idea was to kill the monkey and to make the wife in the hut.

657
01:16:47,720 --> 01:16:53,500
But then in the middle of the journey, like the turtle became a bit said, how would he kill his friend?

658
01:16:53,510 --> 01:17:00,230
So he started like in a way to in order to bend and to ask the monkey for forgiveness.

659
01:17:00,470 --> 01:17:05,780
He told the story to the monkey that what is going to happen. Then the monkey was extremely clever.

660
01:17:05,780 --> 01:17:10,860
And he said, you know, we monkey is when we need our hand, we don't take our heart with us.

661
01:17:10,880 --> 01:17:17,720
We actually needed that. So so the turtle took the monkey back and this is the button.

662
01:17:17,730 --> 01:17:21,110
The soda is like it's it's a dilemma.

663
01:17:21,110 --> 01:17:26,790
Like what? What would you choose? But then someone like a lady would choose a friend over.

664
01:17:27,350 --> 01:17:31,010
Over a romantic love. Back to your second question.

665
01:17:31,070 --> 01:17:39,170
It's just like if you can just remind me again, I was just thinking in terms of like, you know, the notion of keeping one's enemies close.

666
01:17:39,170 --> 01:17:44,690
What does that mean? And it sort of struck me as maybe somewhat Machiavellian as it were.

667
01:17:44,720 --> 01:17:54,950
Yes. It was actually a very this notion was extremely important in the constant in the context of boys, because boys society was bullied.

668
01:17:54,950 --> 01:18:02,570
The governance was divided across courts in different areas, like in very Shiraz like that.

669
01:18:02,780 --> 01:18:09,589
So they were different. Boy, it was years in these course and they were competing relationship and there was a particular was

670
01:18:09,590 --> 01:18:16,520
the visit of the son had been I bet he was in in constant competition with have been saddened

671
01:18:16,520 --> 01:18:21,919
and have been sad then always wanted to know about what's going on at the court not that so and

672
01:18:21,920 --> 01:18:28,340
apparently though he knew the court even saw them inside out and therefore had been stopped.

673
01:18:28,340 --> 01:18:37,159
That had been studied through the he wanted to know about the court of about bed and wanted to send the correspondence.

674
01:18:37,160 --> 01:18:42,320
He was always sending correspondence to the court of about a bed in an attempt to keep.

675
01:18:43,330 --> 01:18:50,310
A kind of diplomatic relationship and friendship with him in order to understand what is the next move by Ibn Abed, etc.

676
01:18:51,290 --> 01:18:56,510
So this kind of type of friendship were necessary at the time?

677
01:18:57,020 --> 01:19:03,710
Absolutely. And I think, yeah, that would that would make a lot of sense to contemporary sensibilities as well, I think.

678
01:19:03,980 --> 01:19:08,360
Just very briefly, surely, and this idea of, you know,

679
01:19:08,360 --> 01:19:13,429
Muslims cannot be humiliated into adopting the abandonment of cow sacrifice is really

680
01:19:13,430 --> 01:19:19,130
fascinating because on what basis of Muslims effectively abandoned slavery in our times?

681
01:19:19,520 --> 01:19:24,960
And I wonder if people like, you know, there was a Han, if they were alive today would be saying that.

682
01:19:25,010 --> 01:19:28,370
But actually we need to re-establish slavery.

683
01:19:29,300 --> 01:19:36,800
And so, yeah, I kind of wonder. And that's more or less my question to yourself, like, how do you think there's an analogy?

684
01:19:36,800 --> 01:19:41,880
Or Am I missing something here in the way that they would have seen this? What's a slave you can actually do?

685
01:19:42,080 --> 01:19:47,800
So, you know, in the sense that, you know, if we're saying, okay, slave account sacrifice is not a word yet.

686
01:19:48,030 --> 01:19:51,120
It's more back in the Shariah. So you can abandon that.

687
01:19:51,660 --> 01:19:58,920
So that is a very common argument against slavery. It's a common against, for example, multiple marriage for men.

688
01:19:59,880 --> 01:20:03,450
And so there are a whole host of areas where you can say, well, this isn't an obligation technically.

689
01:20:03,450 --> 01:20:06,630
So we can abandon it because it's better for us in this context. Right.

690
01:20:08,240 --> 01:20:11,309
So, so so the argument there is that in this particular context,

691
01:20:11,310 --> 01:20:16,120
it's a marker of Muslim distinction that God sacrifice distinguishes Muslims from non-Muslims.

692
01:20:16,170 --> 01:20:21,209
So if you were to abandon it under the coercion or the pressure of a non-Muslim community,

693
01:20:21,210 --> 01:20:26,340
that would be to eliminate that would mean undermining our own position in relation to the other.

694
01:20:27,450 --> 01:20:38,570
So interestingly, even someone like Abdel Bari of the Flashpoint movement, he in fact argued that if Hindus insist that Muslims abandon God,

695
01:20:38,650 --> 01:20:43,410
sacrifice at that point, in fact, it will become obligatory for Muslims to engage in sacrifice.

696
01:20:43,920 --> 01:20:50,250
So, in fact, he tells his compatriots and the Indian National Congress also that don't insist on this point,

697
01:20:50,670 --> 01:20:57,870
because the more you insist, the more I will also become legally obligated to tell my community that you must undertake this practice,

698
01:20:57,870 --> 01:21:05,399
because in terms of a classical legal sort of deem dropping, the insistence will allow me then to tell them that,

699
01:21:05,400 --> 01:21:12,059
okay, at least on everyday matters at this, at least on Eve, you can at least drop down sacrifice.

700
01:21:12,060 --> 01:21:15,420
And I will not engage in sacrifice either on either that at least.

701
01:21:15,750 --> 01:21:21,120
So in order for this to happen. Both sides have to temper their insistence on this matter.

702
01:21:21,750 --> 01:21:29,100
But even someone like Abdel Bari is very insistent that that that the that this should not come from the

703
01:21:29,100 --> 01:21:34,980
pressure or the insistence of the non-Muslim community or else a marker of Muslim distinction will be erased.

704
01:21:35,250 --> 01:21:44,190
So that is the kind of what I'm interested in, how the kind of power relations and assumptions of power dynamics coming from the

705
01:21:44,370 --> 01:21:50,280
pre-modern Muslim imperial framework of law is informing both groups of scholars,

706
01:21:50,520 --> 01:21:56,910
and hence this intra Muslim debate is not really about for or against pluralism or forward against inclusiveness of an exclusive,

707
01:21:57,540 --> 01:22:03,870
but rather it's really a negotiation of a pre-modern framework of law in a radically

708
01:22:04,050 --> 01:22:09,080
new set of conditions and how that negotiation leads to new forms of politics.

709
01:22:09,090 --> 01:22:11,100
And that's all connecting friendship politics.

710
01:22:11,560 --> 01:22:20,820
Just to add a tag on to this, I mean, what's interesting is that some of the Ottoman opponents to European pressure to emancipate slaves.

711
01:22:21,180 --> 01:22:28,200
Right. This was their argument as well, that interesting Western powers are insisting and in some respects undermining our sovereignty,

712
01:22:28,950 --> 01:22:32,160
that that makes it all the more important for us to maintain this practice.

713
01:22:32,650 --> 01:22:37,080
So I guess it's not it's not a salient issue in South Asia, right?

714
01:22:37,440 --> 01:22:40,560
Slavery in particular, but in other parts of the world, it may well be.

715
01:22:42,150 --> 01:22:42,870
That's interesting.

716
01:22:43,950 --> 01:22:55,470
Thank you so much to both of you to thank you for giving so much of your time and really sharing your the latest you've been engaged in.

717
01:22:55,950 --> 01:23:00,540
And it's really been eye opening in so many levels. I wish I always feel this way.

718
01:23:00,620 --> 01:23:03,180
I wish we had so much more time to engage in these conversations.

719
01:23:04,170 --> 01:23:12,270
But I hope that this encourages our listeners and future sort of viewers of the podcast to,

720
01:23:12,930 --> 01:23:20,340
you know, get their hands on your books at least and, you know, benefit from from that experience.

721
01:23:20,940 --> 01:23:27,240
Before we conclude, I just wanted to mention that we do have an A session,

722
01:23:27,450 --> 01:23:32,310
which is our final session for this month, for this term of the Oxford Political Thought Seminar.

723
01:23:32,640 --> 01:23:35,310
And this session will be on secularity.

724
01:23:35,340 --> 01:23:44,400
So on Wednesday, the 30th of November, and we'll be joined by Amanda Salvatore and Winfred Winifred Fuller's Sullivan,

725
01:23:45,150 --> 01:23:48,630
both dealing with the theme of secularity.

726
01:23:49,050 --> 01:23:55,170
So we'd really welcome you to join at that point. But until then, we look forward to seeing you.

727
01:23:55,200 --> 01:23:58,640
I want to thank again Shirley. Thank you so much. Thank you so much.

728
01:23:59,490 --> 01:24:03,720
Thank you so much. Thank you. Thanks. Thank you. It's a true pleasure.

729
01:24:03,800 --> 01:24:09,000
Thank you so much. Great. Nice meeting you, Shirley. Wonderful meeting you as much, Robert Patterson.

730
01:24:09,750 --> 01:24:14,280
Take care. Goodbye. Thank you very much. Good evening to everyone.