1 00:00:03,710 --> 00:00:07,130 Hi, everybody. Welcome to this week's broadcast. 2 00:00:07,130 --> 00:00:12,170 And I'm delighted to welcome as my guest, Valeria Longo. 3 00:00:12,170 --> 00:00:15,440 Lozano Valeria. Welcome to the cast. Thank you. 4 00:00:15,440 --> 00:00:22,159 Thank you for having me here. It's my great pleasure. And for those of you who don't know Valeria, 5 00:00:22,160 --> 00:00:31,640 Valeria is just completing her Winfield Hofmann Trust sponsored graduate course at Worcester in 6 00:00:32,090 --> 00:00:36,860 Global Governance and Governance and Diplomacy at the Department of International Development. 7 00:00:36,890 --> 00:00:48,950 Thank you for filling me in on that. And before we get into what you've been doing and what you might be doing next there, you're from Mexico. 8 00:00:49,040 --> 00:00:53,300 Tell us about where you studied before you arrived in Oxford. 9 00:00:53,750 --> 00:00:56,660 That's a great question. So hello, everyone. My name is Valeria. 10 00:00:56,690 --> 00:01:04,700 I'm 22 and I actually began my work in social justice through the specific lens of gender equality. 11 00:01:05,180 --> 00:01:15,049 And I began when I was 16. So when I was back in Mexico, I went to a Catholic private school where I made amazing friendships. 12 00:01:15,050 --> 00:01:20,150 But also I feel like there was a lot of, like, status quo that I had to deal with. 13 00:01:20,540 --> 00:01:24,139 And it was an amazing experience growing up in Mexico. 14 00:01:24,140 --> 00:01:30,080 But of course, I feel like as someone that grew up with a lot of interactions on the Internet, 15 00:01:30,080 --> 00:01:37,550 I was always intrigued and interested in why there were certain conversations that were more difficult to have in my home country and in my hometown, 16 00:01:37,940 --> 00:01:41,780 and that really inspired me to look to have an education abroad. 17 00:01:42,230 --> 00:01:48,770 So I was really interested in international relations when I was really young, specifically sustainable development focussed on young women and girls. 18 00:01:48,770 --> 00:01:51,770 And I decided to go to the University of Texas at Austin. 19 00:01:52,340 --> 00:01:56,000 Right. All majoring in international relations and Latin American studies. 20 00:01:56,030 --> 00:01:58,790 I mean, I'm incredibly passionate about international relations, 21 00:01:58,790 --> 00:02:08,059 but I think that complementing this perspective with the realities in Latin America and the realities of historically marginalised groups, 22 00:02:08,060 --> 00:02:13,850 I think that really allowed me to widen my understanding of what's happening out there. 23 00:02:14,390 --> 00:02:24,110 And I finished my undergrad studies in three years, and it was just in 2022 and the pandemic was ending, you know, 24 00:02:24,530 --> 00:02:31,810 and because I had graduated one year early, I had this wide young people called Quarter Life crisis aerosols. 25 00:02:32,270 --> 00:02:35,630 My friends and I were asking ourselves, What's next for us? What should you doing? 26 00:02:36,200 --> 00:02:43,550 And after much thinking, I decided that it was really important to continue with my education now that I continue to have the opportunity. 27 00:02:44,030 --> 00:02:50,360 So I decided to apply for Oxford, and I found this amazing global governance, and I thought it was a perfect fit. 28 00:02:50,930 --> 00:02:56,840 But then and I think I have discussed this with you before. My first question was, Well, how am I going to go all the way to Oxford? 29 00:02:57,290 --> 00:02:59,600 Who is going to help me get there, financially speaking? 30 00:02:59,930 --> 00:03:07,520 And that's when I heard about the Ph.D. And there'll be some people listening who don't really know about it and feel. 31 00:03:07,520 --> 00:03:11,030 Hofmann trust. It transforms the lives of many people. 32 00:03:11,030 --> 00:03:16,070 And, you know, I'm a great supporter. Tell us very briefly about it. 33 00:03:16,580 --> 00:03:24,680 Well, I think what involvement trust is one of those I would like to go to almost like a jewel that you don't know except someone you discover. 34 00:03:24,680 --> 00:03:28,280 It's like, why is no one talking about that? Good way to describe it. 35 00:03:28,640 --> 00:03:35,719 And the first thing that ignited my curiosity about the trust is how important 36 00:03:35,720 --> 00:03:40,670 the social impact is and also how important the community aspect of it is. 37 00:03:41,120 --> 00:03:47,989 And I feel like that was a main thing that I was looking for because I knew that going to a master's degree in the UK would 38 00:03:47,990 --> 00:03:56,580 be a completely different experience because the international student body in Oxford is just much more international. 39 00:03:57,050 --> 00:04:05,510 Huge, isn't it? Exactly. So I just knew that I wanted to have a community that I could rely on and that once I stepped foot on at Oxford, 40 00:04:05,510 --> 00:04:08,840 I would have like people that I would know and that I could have a conversation with. 41 00:04:08,870 --> 00:04:18,349 I think what provided for me when I first arrived to Oxford was not only like an eye opening experience of 42 00:04:18,350 --> 00:04:24,290 knowing the type of impactful work that people are doing and that it's possible for other people to do, 43 00:04:24,740 --> 00:04:30,469 but also to understand how that social impact activities that people are really executing 44 00:04:30,470 --> 00:04:37,760 in the world have a academic aspect to it and what that means for a university like Oxford. 45 00:04:38,150 --> 00:04:44,809 So it was just an incredibly exciting experience to be looking forward to be part of when I was applying. 46 00:04:44,810 --> 00:04:47,270 And then when I actually got the scholarship, 47 00:04:47,270 --> 00:04:52,190 it was just something that I knew it was going to change my experience here because it's a small community. 48 00:04:52,220 --> 00:04:55,370 How many scholars are there every year? 28 and 30. 49 00:04:55,370 --> 00:05:03,080 Do I think it's a small cohort? You immediately become part of the Tea family as well as then. 50 00:05:03,260 --> 00:05:11,300 Being part of college life. And WHCA scholars are situated in a number of colleges right across the university. 51 00:05:11,400 --> 00:05:17,600 Yeah, I mean, I think I have had the opportunity to know other colleges precisely because of my W friends. 52 00:05:17,700 --> 00:05:22,820 Yeah, but also, I think being able to have that international community that you're really close with. 53 00:05:22,840 --> 00:05:32,510 Yeah, I think that has also really as an Irish person really helped me form my understandings of social impact in other places in the world, 54 00:05:32,900 --> 00:05:34,790 which I think it's something that, 55 00:05:34,790 --> 00:05:41,089 I mean we have access to online, but like actually getting to hear those stories from the people that experience them, 56 00:05:41,090 --> 00:05:43,300 I think that's something that really changes your life. 57 00:05:43,310 --> 00:05:50,150 So not only do you get a great address book and friendships and the Friendship Network all over the world, 58 00:05:50,150 --> 00:05:54,980 but you get the opportunity to test things in real time and to hear about real experiences. 59 00:05:55,340 --> 00:06:02,989 But let's move on to the global governance work that you've been doing because we've talked about this before. 60 00:06:02,990 --> 00:06:13,070 I'm from Wales. One of the really inspired pieces of legislation that applies in Wales but not elsewhere in the UK is the future generations. 61 00:06:13,120 --> 00:06:18,530 I know it's something that you as a young leader really care passionately about. 62 00:06:18,650 --> 00:06:24,350 Yes, I actually I think that was also one of the reasons why I was kind of like so 63 00:06:24,350 --> 00:06:29,719 insistent when myself in coming to Oxford because I actually wrote my capstone, 64 00:06:29,720 --> 00:06:36,080 which is like a small dissertation when I was an undergrad about Wales and commissioner for future generations. 65 00:06:36,680 --> 00:06:43,460 I think when I look back because now I have already submitted my dissertation and I'm just like waiting, waiting to hear back. 66 00:06:44,540 --> 00:06:49,040 When I think back of the work that I did when I was an undergrad and now the work that I have done in Oxford, 67 00:06:49,550 --> 00:06:58,340 it feels really fulfilling to be able to relate those two things because when I was an undergrad I was doing this research on why are countries and, 68 00:06:58,340 --> 00:07:01,940 and governments like that of Wales have been doing for future generations. 69 00:07:01,940 --> 00:07:09,530 And now I'm looking beyond the country level aspect and asking these bigger questions when it comes to the global governance level, 70 00:07:09,860 --> 00:07:14,930 which of course my degree here in Oxford has really for me to think about it in different ways. 71 00:07:15,080 --> 00:07:23,960 So pausing there because there's so much we we can talk about, can you give us an example of the kind of initiatives that you've been thinking about? 72 00:07:24,170 --> 00:07:31,760 So when I worked with the information, we created this report called Our Future Agenda, and it had several pillars to it. 73 00:07:31,760 --> 00:07:36,799 We talked about education, we talked about environment, we talk about the future of work. 74 00:07:36,800 --> 00:07:39,830 We also talked about the future of multilateralism. 75 00:07:40,220 --> 00:07:46,040 And I remember, of course, my generation and just future generations are incredibly interested in the climate crisis. 76 00:07:46,550 --> 00:07:50,300 And when we were working on this document, we were asking ourselves, 77 00:07:50,300 --> 00:07:58,670 how can we redefine or rethink the social contract for young generations now that COVID is happening? 78 00:07:58,700 --> 00:08:04,969 Right. And something that came up when we were writing this report was realising that although all these governments 79 00:08:04,970 --> 00:08:09,890 were not only promising that they were going to do better when it came to climate change and renewables, 80 00:08:10,640 --> 00:08:16,910 but also, you know, making these big promises and and saying that we're going to do better whenever COVID happened, of course, 81 00:08:16,910 --> 00:08:22,649 the economy had a huge breakdown and instead of complying with those promises, 82 00:08:22,650 --> 00:08:26,240 they started reinvesting on fossil fuels and all these different things. 83 00:08:26,690 --> 00:08:31,549 And it was so interesting doing research for this report, because the more that we research, 84 00:08:31,550 --> 00:08:35,480 the more more that we realise that it really didn't make a lot of sense. 85 00:08:35,480 --> 00:08:40,549 It was kind of like a Band-Aid to the bigger problem, because if we look at research, 86 00:08:40,550 --> 00:08:45,860 we see that young people are less interested in less likely on engaging in those industries. 87 00:08:46,220 --> 00:08:50,720 So what we did with this report is that we proposed this idea of a Green New Deal, 88 00:08:50,720 --> 00:08:54,620 which was inspired on some policy work that was happening in the US. 89 00:08:55,160 --> 00:09:03,650 And basically our entire claim is it research shows that the next generation of workers are less likely to want to engage with those industries. 90 00:09:03,920 --> 00:09:11,990 Then why are we trying to revamp the economy through those industries that us young workers are less likely to be involved with? 91 00:09:12,070 --> 00:09:15,740 And that goes to really important points, doesn't it? 92 00:09:15,740 --> 00:09:27,350 About short termism? Yes. Yes, because this is why anticipating the needs of future generations is so fundamentally challenging because politics all 93 00:09:27,350 --> 00:09:33,980 over the world and the way that the political system and political leadership works is that it's all about short term. 94 00:09:34,010 --> 00:09:39,500 Yes. Decision making. I mean, how do we learn how to be short termist? 95 00:09:39,650 --> 00:09:44,090 What I after thinking for many, many months and what I should be writing my dissertation on, 96 00:09:44,870 --> 00:09:51,109 I decided to look at the philosophical aspect of your two generations because it was interesting to me 97 00:09:51,110 --> 00:09:57,050 how when I talk to decision makers or just people that work in the UN or in different governments, 98 00:09:57,200 --> 00:10:02,900 they were all interested in working future generations. But it appeared to me that it wasn't clear what was the end. 99 00:10:03,000 --> 00:10:13,650 Goal. And when I say the end goal is if we were to try to imagine the future that we want for ourselves and our children and our grandchildren, 100 00:10:14,250 --> 00:10:18,960 everyone had a different understanding and vision for it. 101 00:10:19,320 --> 00:10:26,430 So what I tried to do for my dissertation was put into context for different frameworks for philosophy. 102 00:10:26,440 --> 00:10:30,749 I looked at utilitarianism, rawlsian justice, intergenerational equity, 103 00:10:30,750 --> 00:10:34,940 environmental justice, and I was just trying to learn and unlearn what this meant. 104 00:10:34,950 --> 00:10:39,929 I was like, Are we trying to maximise the amount of people that we're saving in the future or 105 00:10:39,930 --> 00:10:43,830 are we trying to provide an environment that is liveable for future generations? 106 00:10:44,490 --> 00:10:51,960 So where did you end up? Because those are all in a completely foreseeable outcomes, but we need to make some tough choices that. 107 00:10:52,320 --> 00:10:58,500 I think the biggest takeaway was realising that this question that I had put forward, 108 00:10:58,500 --> 00:11:06,360 which is what does the future that we want looks like or what should it look like according to us as present generations, 109 00:11:06,720 --> 00:11:11,220 is not even a question that is being asked right now in the multilateral system. 110 00:11:11,340 --> 00:11:16,889 I think the main priority, if we look at because I focussed on the U.N. documents when I was writing my 111 00:11:16,890 --> 00:11:21,900 dissertation and we look at the work of the U.N. up until the last two or three years, 112 00:11:22,290 --> 00:11:28,380 it has been focussed on making sure that humanity continues to live on. 113 00:11:28,830 --> 00:11:32,220 It has a lot of focus on our quality of life in the future. 114 00:11:32,550 --> 00:11:37,110 It has not focussed on the environment that we need to have a liveable life. 115 00:11:37,560 --> 00:11:42,390 It has simply focussed on us as a human race and making sure that we continue to exist. 116 00:11:42,780 --> 00:11:48,720 And I deeply believe from the work that I have done and from talking to other experts, that we are at a point, 117 00:11:48,750 --> 00:11:53,040 given the climate crisis, where we need to rethink whether that is our ultimate goal, 118 00:11:53,040 --> 00:11:57,509 just to make sure that we live on or whether we should be thinking about what 119 00:11:57,510 --> 00:12:01,620 makes life worth living and why should that look like for the future of humanity. 120 00:12:01,630 --> 00:12:04,980 And as a future leader, what's your view? 121 00:12:05,160 --> 00:12:11,310 I think I'm kind of biased because I have said before that I started working as an activist when I was 16. 122 00:12:11,850 --> 00:12:17,340 So definitely I think I side more to the grassroots approach to this. 123 00:12:17,730 --> 00:12:28,740 And I think there is so much value in questioning the work we're doing from the environmental justice perspective, because at the end of the day, 124 00:12:28,980 --> 00:12:38,220 I truly believe personally that without a liveable and durable environment, then there is a lot to question about whether our life is worth living. 125 00:12:38,730 --> 00:12:41,219 And I think that after writing my dissertation, 126 00:12:41,220 --> 00:12:48,200 I kept realising that we are all so proud of thinking of people centred approaches, which makes sense, right? 127 00:12:48,210 --> 00:12:54,690 Because of after the very difficult history we have had in recent years, it makes sense that we want to put people in the centre, 128 00:12:55,080 --> 00:13:01,750 but I think that we are a point where we need to question ourselves whether we can continue to afford putting people at the centre. 129 00:13:02,400 --> 00:13:09,960 So I think that reassessing things from an environmental justice perspective should be highly considered by decision makers. 130 00:13:09,990 --> 00:13:16,650 Why don't policymakers and politicians listen more to young leaders and future generations? 131 00:13:16,890 --> 00:13:23,879 Why do you think that is? I think there are two levels to it. The first one is, of course, tokenism, which is that in many cultures, 132 00:13:23,880 --> 00:13:29,970 the idea that older people or people with more experience are wiser and hence they have the last decision. 133 00:13:29,970 --> 00:13:37,110 That is something that is just part of certain cultures. In others it just comes down to for certain politicians or decision makers, 134 00:13:37,110 --> 00:13:41,879 it looks good to have us in the picture as young decision makers or young leaders. 135 00:13:41,880 --> 00:13:45,900 But like when it really comes down to negotiation, we kind of like get put on the side. 136 00:13:46,530 --> 00:13:51,480 And I think the second aspect to it is how structurally young people are disadvantaged. 137 00:13:51,630 --> 00:13:56,820 And I know we want to talk about this in our conversation, but in the work that I have done for the Y20, 138 00:13:56,820 --> 00:14:03,000 because I work as a white 20 delegate for Mexico, I think I have had really interesting conversations about structural change, 139 00:14:03,300 --> 00:14:07,830 specifically when it comes, for example, to reducing the age of voters, 140 00:14:07,830 --> 00:14:16,170 because in many countries it ranges from being 21 years old or 18 years old and 18 is normally like the common starting age for voting. 141 00:14:16,530 --> 00:14:25,560 But if we look at research from the OECD, most senior members would agree that the ideal voting age should be 16. 142 00:14:25,770 --> 00:14:30,420 It pushes us to start asking questions. And why is that not the rule already? 143 00:14:31,170 --> 00:14:41,130 And I also think and I think this has been one of the other big takeaways from engaging in the Y20, which is the Y20 is happening in India this year. 144 00:14:41,400 --> 00:14:47,040 And in India they have this concept of self evolution, which I had never heard about, 145 00:14:47,040 --> 00:14:50,370 which I think is so interesting from the intergenerational justice perspective. 146 00:14:50,910 --> 00:14:59,190 And basically what they say is there's this concept that self evolution is this idea that older people in, 147 00:14:59,190 --> 00:15:02,610 in decision making spaces need to like actively. 148 00:15:02,740 --> 00:15:07,060 Start giving the decision, making opportunities to younger people. 149 00:15:07,630 --> 00:15:15,600 And apparently from the work that I have been doing, this has been like a very kind of like big conversation that has been happening in South Asia. 150 00:15:15,610 --> 00:15:21,370 And I think it's so interesting because I have had conversations with other people that tell me, well, 16 is too young. 151 00:15:21,370 --> 00:15:27,099 And I'm like, Well, yeah, but if you look at it, there is no limits on when you stop voting. 152 00:15:27,100 --> 00:15:30,850 And we can also move the focus on the other side, which is not really what I do. 153 00:15:30,850 --> 00:15:34,120 I'm not really asking questions on when should people voting. 154 00:15:34,120 --> 00:15:40,540 But I think we need to also understand that young people are engaging more and more in politics. 155 00:15:40,890 --> 00:15:47,860 Yes, because voting age isn't the only consideration, but it's a really important and powerful one. 156 00:15:48,070 --> 00:15:52,629 So you mentioned zero in 120 in a couple of times. 157 00:15:52,630 --> 00:15:59,530 And so it's one of the reasons that I was determined to invite you along to the podcast. 158 00:15:59,530 --> 00:16:04,240 But tell us what it is and what you were doing on behalf of Mexico. 159 00:16:04,450 --> 00:16:09,159 So the Y20, which is a youth drug from the G20, 160 00:16:09,160 --> 00:16:14,709 it's basically the side of the organisation that works precisely on understanding 161 00:16:14,710 --> 00:16:20,350 what are the interests of young people in the G20 member countries and my country, 162 00:16:20,350 --> 00:16:25,360 Mexico, as part of the G20. And there was an open call this year to participate as a delegate. 163 00:16:25,360 --> 00:16:31,989 And I went through the national call, which was conducted by the Office of Foreign Relations and other entities in the Mexican government, 164 00:16:31,990 --> 00:16:36,430 and I am very happy to share that I was selected. Yeah, which I'm very thankful for it. 165 00:16:37,120 --> 00:16:42,760 And I work as a delegate for the track of shared future governance and democracy. 166 00:16:43,150 --> 00:16:48,549 And the work that I do in the Y20 is focussed on, as I said before, 167 00:16:48,550 --> 00:16:54,850 asking these very difficult questions on what governance and democracy mean for our young people. 168 00:16:54,850 --> 00:16:55,319 So, 169 00:16:55,320 --> 00:17:04,120 so give us a flavour of the kind of things that you were considering as you went off to India and I know had a really interesting and exciting time. 170 00:17:04,120 --> 00:17:10,780 But tell us because there'll be a lot of people listening in who won't necessarily know too much about the detail of Y20. 171 00:17:10,810 --> 00:17:13,570 How did it work and what were you considering? 172 00:17:13,750 --> 00:17:24,850 So we had a pre-summit which happened in March, and so we're meeting in August in VR in India, where we're having our final summit. 173 00:17:25,240 --> 00:17:28,630 And what we hope to achieve from that summit is to write a communique. 174 00:17:28,960 --> 00:17:37,450 And this communique has policy recommendations that are then shared with the Sherpas and the decision makers at the G20 level. 175 00:17:37,600 --> 00:17:44,680 Basically, the entire idea is that we put forward, as young people from the G20 member states, all of our priorities. 176 00:17:44,950 --> 00:17:50,860 And this year there were certain tracks that were defined as priority tracks for young people. 177 00:17:51,520 --> 00:17:55,809 One of them is the one where I'm participating Shared Future. There's another one focus on health. 178 00:17:55,810 --> 00:18:00,459 There's another one focus on peace. There's another one focus on the future of work. 179 00:18:00,460 --> 00:18:07,960 And last but not least, obviously we have climate change. And when I was in, we went to the union territory of Ladakh in India. 180 00:18:08,140 --> 00:18:15,580 And one of the things that I realised is how different our understanding of both governance and democracy, 181 00:18:15,580 --> 00:18:21,610 which is to try to work on, is throughout the world view of the Member states. 182 00:18:21,610 --> 00:18:30,830 In the G20, we had delegates in our track who were sharing how democracy works differently in their countries and, you know, 183 00:18:30,880 --> 00:18:36,430 asking why would we support the certain way of doing democracy when that's not really how it works in the countries. 184 00:18:37,240 --> 00:18:45,459 In my track, we also work on looking at community governance and what that means, which is it's not only grassroots approach to youth governance, 185 00:18:45,460 --> 00:18:52,330 but also thinking of youth advisory councils and indigenous understandings of governance, which also. 186 00:18:52,450 --> 00:19:02,380 So isn't it? Yes, it's really difficult truly to have these negotiations with what I would say are incredible young leaders around the world, 187 00:19:02,770 --> 00:19:10,060 not because they are difficult people to deal with, but because we have so little space in this communique to express what we want. 188 00:19:10,540 --> 00:19:16,630 And also we're also so conscious that the G20 summit has so many priorities and so many things going on 189 00:19:16,930 --> 00:19:23,110 that we also need to be very precise and specific on what our main message is for the decision makers. 190 00:19:23,110 --> 00:19:26,439 So you've still got to finalise the messages. 191 00:19:26,440 --> 00:19:30,610 Yes, we're still working on. Yeah, yeah. But I guess two questions. 192 00:19:30,730 --> 00:19:36,370 One, do you feel as a group of participants in 120 that you were heard? 193 00:19:36,370 --> 00:19:43,269 That's a great question. I think most of us acknowledge that the spaces we have is already a privileged 194 00:19:43,270 --> 00:19:48,940 space in the sense where we already are one step closer to the decision makers. 195 00:19:48,970 --> 00:19:56,860 Yeah. However, as I mentioned before, we are very self aware of both tokenism and the structural disadvantages that exist, 196 00:19:57,340 --> 00:20:02,500 and I think there has been a lot of work done on reducing tokenism, which I think it's a. 197 00:20:03,350 --> 00:20:06,380 But the main work that I, 198 00:20:06,390 --> 00:20:15,770 valerius and individual have been putting forward as a Y 20 delegate has been on the idea of having youth representative for the future, 199 00:20:15,770 --> 00:20:20,220 which would be a Y20 delegation that is part of the G20. 200 00:20:20,240 --> 00:20:30,200 Okay. So basically what I'm putting forward is idea that structurally we exist as this kind of like parallel entity that is coexisting with the G20, 201 00:20:30,200 --> 00:20:37,010 but not really being either part of the negotiations or even like listening to what the negotiations are saying about our input. 202 00:20:37,400 --> 00:20:42,410 And that really puts us behind in our work because on the next year when different delegates come into the work, 203 00:20:42,410 --> 00:20:45,530 we have no feedback on what we did the previous year. 204 00:20:45,530 --> 00:20:52,910 We have no idea what were the priorities or tables that the decision makers were keen of helping us conduct. 205 00:20:53,420 --> 00:21:00,170 And we also really don't understand how impactful our communicate is and how it could be even more impactful. 206 00:21:00,650 --> 00:21:06,950 So the bigger question and the bigger challenge ahead for us now that we continue our work in the Y20 this year, 207 00:21:07,220 --> 00:21:13,880 is how can we ensure that this idea is not lost in words as evidently it has happened before? 208 00:21:14,330 --> 00:21:22,040 Because what we are putting forward is not only obviously working and speaking on behalf of young 209 00:21:22,040 --> 00:21:28,490 generations that are looking for better work opportunities and better climate crisis action, 210 00:21:29,210 --> 00:21:30,860 but also having this long, 211 00:21:30,890 --> 00:21:41,420 long term perspective of what should Sherpas and decision makers in the G20 be prioritising for future generations in the next couple of decades? 212 00:21:41,420 --> 00:21:51,889 That's great. And how optimistic do you feel? I think there's so many people that have great not only will to make it happen, but also interest. 213 00:21:51,890 --> 00:21:59,960 And I think a lot of it comes from people being genuinely interested in making things good and making really valuable change in multilateralism. 214 00:22:00,440 --> 00:22:07,610 I think there is a strong possibility of it happening because as I said before, I think we are now looking at a different approach, 215 00:22:07,610 --> 00:22:13,790 an approach that looks beyond just putting the best looking or best sounding words on the communique, 216 00:22:14,090 --> 00:22:21,950 but actually an approach that taps into the existing interest in the short term that can make it realistic for us to start working in the long term. 217 00:22:22,010 --> 00:22:24,230 Global governance is incredibly important. 218 00:22:24,650 --> 00:22:36,230 Climate change and the climate crisis is really going to drive all sorts of very profound climate and global challenges, whether it's migration, 219 00:22:36,620 --> 00:22:44,030 whether it's equity, you know, how optimistic do do you feel not just about the G20, but, you know, us as a global community? 220 00:22:44,450 --> 00:22:49,040 I think the work that is being conducted right now is, in my opinion, 221 00:22:49,040 --> 00:22:59,660 historical in the sense that we have never before seen the UN and international institutions talk so vividly and so often about future generations. 222 00:23:00,170 --> 00:23:09,350 However, in my opinion, this is given to how impactful and realistic the climate crisis is, 223 00:23:09,800 --> 00:23:16,760 and I think we should not be waiting for it to get worse in order to be more, you know, proactive about this, about this topic. 224 00:23:17,210 --> 00:23:23,360 I think I'm optimistic about the future in the sense where I think that both young people and 225 00:23:23,360 --> 00:23:27,560 just people who simply care about the environment and about having a better future for everyone, 226 00:23:27,920 --> 00:23:37,909 I think they're taking it with a lot of seriousness. However, I think that we need to ask our decision makers specifically national and 227 00:23:37,910 --> 00:23:42,770 international decision making spaces to put it at the priority of their agenda. 228 00:23:42,770 --> 00:23:44,570 And I think that's what we are lacking right now. 229 00:23:45,290 --> 00:23:50,660 The U.N. is set to have a summit of the future next year and also to write a declaration for future generations, 230 00:23:51,080 --> 00:23:56,900 which is set to be a landmark achievement in multilateralism, which is great. 231 00:23:57,320 --> 00:24:05,480 But I think that it should not. Too often we have seen that multilateralism is reactive, and right now we cannot afford that reactivity. 232 00:24:05,600 --> 00:24:12,440 We need to be really proactive and to implement a lot of strategic foresight to what's about to happen in the future. 233 00:24:12,800 --> 00:24:16,850 So sum it up optimistic as long as we're protected. 234 00:24:16,880 --> 00:24:21,440 Yeah, great. And it sounds like an incredible experience. 235 00:24:21,680 --> 00:24:26,600 Why 20 and being on the w t course here at Oxford. 236 00:24:26,720 --> 00:24:34,730 What's next. I am I am trying as someone who is just basically out of the graduate level studies 237 00:24:34,730 --> 00:24:39,350 and someone who is really passionate about the social justice work that I do. 238 00:24:39,620 --> 00:24:46,850 I'm trying to figure out how I can stay true to the work that I have already conducted and stay impactful, 239 00:24:46,880 --> 00:24:56,060 because I think we need to protect young leaders and young people who have already been conducting such impactful 240 00:24:56,060 --> 00:25:02,450 work and make sure that we create pathways for pipelines for them to continue doing that impactful work. 241 00:25:02,910 --> 00:25:10,890 Because one of the aspects that we have talked about a lot when it comes to the future of work is how we don't perceive young leaders as experts. 242 00:25:10,920 --> 00:25:14,680 We live in a society that values we leave at the end of the day. 243 00:25:14,700 --> 00:25:19,379 And what I would say is an ageing society and a society that values looking at 244 00:25:19,380 --> 00:25:22,410 your résumé and knowing how many years of experience you have been doing A, 245 00:25:22,440 --> 00:25:25,499 B or C, and well, I think that that is true to that. 246 00:25:25,500 --> 00:25:33,420 And we need to make sure that our decision makers and our experts have some sort of tangible experience in the field work. 247 00:25:33,750 --> 00:25:40,020 I think more and more we are understanding that age is not necessarily the main 248 00:25:40,020 --> 00:25:46,800 thing that we should be looking at when it comes to giving space for for expertise. 249 00:25:47,400 --> 00:25:54,420 So basically, I'm really trying really hard to find opportunities that allow me to continue my work as an 250 00:25:54,420 --> 00:25:59,969 intergenerational justice expert and also continue to expand on other interests of mine, 251 00:25:59,970 --> 00:26:05,070 such as gender equality, sustainable development and environmental governance. 252 00:26:05,520 --> 00:26:10,530 Hopefully this will lead to me working in some sort of NGO, 253 00:26:10,620 --> 00:26:14,459 international institution or development bank that allows me to have a better 254 00:26:14,460 --> 00:26:21,840 understanding of how we can connect grassroots initiatives with decision makers. 255 00:26:21,880 --> 00:26:25,190 It sounds like a great ambition. Thank you. Let's see. 256 00:26:25,200 --> 00:26:28,290 I wish you well, as we all do in Worcester. 257 00:26:28,500 --> 00:26:33,660 But if you had one wish to change, you know the way that governance works. 258 00:26:34,380 --> 00:26:37,650 But if I had the power to grant your wish, what would you wish for? 259 00:26:38,280 --> 00:26:45,090 That's a great question. I think that too often, from my experience, 260 00:26:45,570 --> 00:26:52,500 I have seen decision makers take decisions based on and we have talked about it so much 261 00:26:52,500 --> 00:26:59,850 in this focus on immediate needs or immediate crises which are so important to handle. 262 00:27:00,060 --> 00:27:01,290 And I acknowledge that. 263 00:27:01,470 --> 00:27:09,810 But I think when we're responding to this immediate needs or this immediate crises, we do so without really assessing the long term impact. 264 00:27:10,410 --> 00:27:17,280 And I think that if I could change anything in global governance and multilateralism would be kind of 265 00:27:17,280 --> 00:27:24,270 this natural bias that we have in just like looking at things immediately at this short term way. 266 00:27:24,900 --> 00:27:34,240 But I think that the future of humanity as a whole is looking beyond immediacy and looking more into what the future holds for us. 267 00:27:34,260 --> 00:27:43,169 And speaking on behalf of past generations, not that we're over yet, but generations who currently leaders we know. 268 00:27:43,170 --> 00:27:47,219 And the Climate Emergency is a great example of that. We don't have all the answers. 269 00:27:47,220 --> 00:27:51,190 So that was why I was keen to talk to you. Good luck. 270 00:27:51,210 --> 00:27:54,300 Thank you for participating in the broadcast. 271 00:27:54,300 --> 00:28:03,420 But Valeria, really good luck and I really support your ambition for future generations to be actively involved. 272 00:28:03,600 --> 00:28:05,700 My view is that without that support, 273 00:28:05,700 --> 00:28:12,270 we're not going to tackle the very issues that you're raising that really demands different ways of thinking, different perspectives. 274 00:28:12,300 --> 00:28:15,790 And last but not least, the end of short termism. 275 00:28:15,820 --> 00:28:19,110 So, yes. Thank you so much. Thank you so much for the invitation.